Vlans over wan

Is it possible to run a vlan over a wan link on my router ?

Yes, but don't do it......
There shouldn't be any reason for you to 'Bridge' over the WAN. Use Layer-3 and route your traffic.
Andy

Similar Messages

VLANs On WAN Side

I'm looking for a security device that can handle VLANs on the WAN side.
Like virtual WAN interfaces; one for each VLAN
I'm hoping something like the SA540 can do it.
Any suggestions?

Hi,
SA500 today supports only vlan on LAN ports. vlan/sub-interfaces over WAN is not supported.
You may want to check out Cisco IOS 800 router or ASA that should support what you are looking for.
On the other hand, I am interested in understanding what you are trying to accomplish with subinterface support over WAN?
i.e. sub-interface based application service provided by local ISP? or? Feel free to send me through private message if preferred.
Regards,
Richard

NAC HA deployed over WAN

Hi ,
Can CAM/CAS be deployed in HA over WAN?. CAM1/CAS1 in DC1 and CAM2/CAS2 in DC2.
Thanks all

Hi Faisal,
This is what i'm thinking , extending L2 VLANs across WAN with LAN-like latency. But i want to know what are these values (delay, bandwith) between sites so i don't have problems with the HA?. The customer wants to implement HA with one server in one DC and one server in DC(the solution involves NAM HA , NAS HA and Profiler HA) with L2 connection between them over WAN.
Thanks,

CCP / CPO VM Migration over WAN

Hi All,
I've the test environment in location1 (Japan) and production environment in location2(U.S)
After testing completed, want to migrate the CCP / CPO VMs to production environment
what is best approach (VM Migration over WAN ? - with huge file size
or we can go for fresh install in Destination location ? if so, how to migrate the code base from CCP?
(for CPO we can export the process to a shared location and download it - how about CCP)
Any best approach possible?
Thanks,
yoga ..

Hi Eneudenberger, thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it. I have thought of this as a solution and here are my thoughts. This will certainly work with a small number of VLANs. I am trying to serve a large number of VLANs so this solution becomes less desireable as the number of VLANS increase and therefore increases the number of firewall instances required to support the solution. I am also trying to limit the traffic that goes through the firewalls. This would force all off subnet traffic to flow through the firewall which is not a requirement for our solution and would increase the hardware requirements for the firewall itself, forcing us into a very large FW platform. Besides all of that, I have used TCP state bypass to allow failover and failback between geographically disparate sites. TCP state bypass comes with its own set of downsides,
1. (obvious) no TCP state maintenance.
1a. TCP timers need to be tweaked because connections are not removed from the firewall tables on FIN ACK. In some environments with lots of transient short lived connections, this can cause connection count exhaustion.
1b. Service policy inspections for tcp don't work. Loss of FTP inspection will turn your firewall into swiss cheese.
1c. Each firewall rule you may now needs a reverse rule allowing the reverse connection i.e. create a firewall rule on inside interface allowing machines to "any" on tcp destination port 80 and now you need a rule on the outside interface allowing tcp source port 80 from "any" to your machines.
TCP State bypass isn't fun!
All that aside, I have been told by someone on another forum that Cisco is adding the ability to have the VM move detection separated from the xTR function so that we can put the firewalls between the WAN and the Server Distribution, which would be fantastic. I haven't seen anything as of yet but let me know if you come across it or have any other ideas, Thanks!
Carlo

Sharing an iTunes Library over WAN?

Sorry if this question has been asked before but my searching of the forum here has only seemed to turn up questions and anwswers on sharing over a local network. Here is my question.
Is it possible to share an iTunes library over the internet? And if so, how? If it isn't I'd like to know so I can stop trying to track down how to do this.
I have a Titanium G4 at home running iTunes 6.01 using a cable modem and router. The router firewall has been setup with the proper ports for iTunes and FTP (FTP works fine). My work computer is a G5 running iTunes 6.01 connected via a DSL modem/router.
I have no other issues connecting to my home computer from work, but I can't see my shared music at home on my work computer.
Thanks for any info.

Issue solved. Here is what I did. I setup my Mac at home so I could connect at work. Inside the iTunes library on my work Mac I created an alias to the iTunes Music folder on my home Mac. Since my library at home and work are exactly the same iTunes on my work Mac sees a local library file but is streaming the music over WAN from my Mac at home.
The are some stops and starts as the connection is over WAN, but it's pretty smooth. Do not know what will happen if I need to add or subtract from the library on either Mac.
Just bringing this to the front in case anyone is interested in trying it themselves.

Airport Extreme and External Hard Drive. Backup over WAN?

Hi
I'm new to Mac's and just got a macbook air and a airport extreme. I connected my external hard (toshiba) drive to the AE and my computer will recognize it, but when I try to connect to it using Time Machine my external hard drive is not recognized as a device that I can backup to over my WAN. I'm not sure if this is possible, but I would like to be able to backup over the WAN if it is possible. Is it possible to backup using time machine over WAN using an AE and a non apple external hard drive?

Time Machine cannot backup to a hard drive unless it is formatted in Mac OS Extended (Journaled), also known as HFS+.
You have me scratching my head about backing up through the WAN port. Normally, the WAN port would be used for a connection from a modem.....or another router.
However, if you have the AirPort Extreme configured to connect to another router via Ethernet, and the AirPort Extreme is set to operate in Bridge Mode, then you don't have a WAN port, they are all LAN ports, so it would not matter which of the ports that you used.

Time Capsule 2TB missing "Share Disks over WAN" option

I bought a time capsule about a month ago. Setup was no problem. Have a MobileMe account. Successfully setup remote access using MobileMe. Needed to select "Share Disks Over WAN" under the file sharing tab which is under the disk tab in setup in order to make it work.
Bought another time capsule yesterday and trying to setup in another location. This model does not have that "Share Disks Over WAN" option. Am I missing something? Did Apple make a change? I am not able to access this new drive remotely now, even with my MobileMe account active.

"As I write this, I am using my wife's iPad to browse files and folders on the Time Capsule disk. I can switch over to the disk attached to the AirPort Extreme with a single tap."
Awesome! Hopefully I will have the same luck as you!
"I said that Filebrowser will do a very nice job. One of my support policies is that I never offer advice or instructions unless I have done it myself. "
Well that's good to know going forward!
"Make sense?"
Yep - no confusion whatsoever.
Brian

The whole configure over WAN thing is confusing me I don't want anyone to be able to access my airport extreme over the WAN. How can I check to make sure that is the way I have it setup?

I just bought a new airport extreme and I want to make sure that is NOT set up for "configure over WAN". How do I check to make sure that is how I have it set up? I only want access to the base via WPA2 password

Open AirPort Utility, select the AirPort Extreme, and click Manual Setup
Click the Base Station tab located just below the row of icons
Remove any check mark that might be in the box next to Allow Setup over WAN
Click Update to save your settings and the AirPort Extreme will restart in 25-30 seconds
For what it is worth, if you leave the box checked, any computer that tries to access the settings on the Airport Extreme will be asked for the device password....not the wireless network password.

Bonjour & disk sharing over WAN -Expert/Genius help required

*Goal: Learn how to connect to my USB hard disk over WAN, share drive with specific people.*
I'm trying to figure out how to remotely access my data on the external drive via connected via USB to my AEBN.
I've spent several hours dinking around with my router, trying to see if I can access the drive over the WAN. I haven't found any manuals, discussions, or K-Base articles that spell it out for me. Below is a list of things I've done. Please indicate whether they are relevant, and if possible what the procedure is. Thanks:
Conditions: I have a static IP address and through the DHCP tab I have assigned all attached machines a static LAN IP address.
*1. Airport>Base Station: Allow configuration over Ethernet WAN port.* I've checked this box and can remotely admin my AEBN from my PC laptop (XP) via the Airport Utility.
*2. Airport>Access Control: MAC Address Access Control.* I didn't know if this would help or hurt anything so I added the MAC address for all ethernet and wireless ports connected to my network and given unlimited or untimed access. +No noticeable difference.+
*3. Internet>DHCP: DHCP Reservations.* As mentioned above in conditions, I've assigned an internal IP address for each device's ethernet and wireless ports, based on the MAC address. +Seems like this and Access Control are redundant except for the time settings.+
*4. Disks>File Sharing:* Enable file sharing is checked, with accounts (configured), "Share disks over ethernet WAN port" is also checked, as is "Advertise disks globally using Bonjour". Not sure what to put in the bottom two fields (Workgroup and WINS Server) so they're blank.
*5. Advanced>Port Mapping:* I've assigned ports to my iMac for gaming and SSH access but I don't think these would effect the USB disk would they?
*6. Advanced>Bonjour:* "Use a wide-area hostname" is checked. My LAN network name is in the Hostname field, for Domain I just typed my WAN IP address, and I put something in for Name and Password.
I'd love any assistance to figure this out.
Lastly, how does Bonjour help over the WAN? Is there some sort of Bonjour application I open log-in, like FTP client software?

Since this discussion has now been resurrected...
The advice provided by chrisfenix will allow you to access the Airport drive from a PC on your private LAN.
The preceding discussion, however, was on the topic of accessing the Airport drive remotely over the internet. To do that, you could still use the advice provided by chrisfenix but substitute the public IP address of the Base Station. To find that out (and answer a question posed earlier in this discussion as well) just go to http://whatismyip.com/ from any computer on your own network.
To answer a question posed by the originator of this discussion - Bonjour is not at all necessary for remote access of the Airport drive. Those people who know how to use this feature will know what it is for and how to implement it - the rest of us can just pretend this feature doesn't exist.

Where to place files and folder in shared disk over WAN

Hello, I have a new Airport Time Capsule 3TB and I want to share my disk over WAN for remote accessing.
When I log to the server with my MacBook or iPhone, I see "Data" folder, and inside it I see my Time Machine backups.
My question is: where, -in the Time Capsule disk-, do I have to place the files / folders that I want to share over WAN. I am afraid to damage or corrupt my Time Capsule backups.
Thank you in advance.

It is not possible to partition the Time Capsule drive.....unless you.....
Pull the drive from the Time Capsule case....(voids the warranty)
Install the drive in a separate enclosure or caddy
Connect the enclosure directly to your Mac
Use Disk Utility to partition the drive
Reinstall the drive back in the Time Capsule
This is a lot of work....and should best be left to a technician.
All things considered, it would be better if you dedicated the Time Capsule for Time Machine backups only...and added another drive for your shared file needs, but few users seem willing to do this.

Multicast server/client over wan

Ok, first of I am kinda new in programming network stuff.
Then I am gonna try to be clear in the things that I am trying to accomplish.
The environement.
I have a machine A that has 2 interfaces :
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:20:96:CE:96
inet addr:192.168.1.49 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2328871 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:355492 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:178361234 (170.0 Mb) TX bytes:34186479 (32.6 Mb)
Interrupt:11
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:23:45:74:EC
inet addr:192.168.2.2 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:813915 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:7538202 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:53318289 (50.8 Mb) TX bytes:1092719670 (1042.0 Mb)
Interrupt:15 Base address:0x3000 Memory:f7ee0000-f7f00000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:56496 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:56496 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:7952617 (7.5 Mb) TX bytes:7952617 (7.5 Mb)
This machine is connected thru a router
The routers connects to a WAN with MULTICAST enabled
then another router to which the second machine is connected
MACHINE B
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:20:96:0F:94
inet addr:192.168.1.58 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2322957 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:363116 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:177550404 (169.3 Mb) TX bytes:33507499 (31.9 Mb)
Interrupt:30
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:23:45:78:90
inet addr:192.168.3.2 Bcast:192.168.3.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:160838 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:6781 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:11450177 (10.9 Mb) TX bytes:746369 (728.8 Kb)
Interrupt:28 Base address:0x3000 Memory:f7ee0000-f7f00000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:158 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:158 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:23916 (23.3 Kb) TX bytes:23916 (23.3 Kb)
The two machine are on different networks.
My goal is to have Machine A send multicast data thru eth2 to be sent in the wan and to be received by Machine B on eth2 too.
Obviously the two machine are on separated networks.
I have tried everything I could but I cannot get machine B to pickup the messages sent by A. It worked fine when on the same LAN but not over WAN.
The multicast address that I use it 239.55.55.80 and the port 4445.
I think I have a problem to link the interface to my app ( I used setInterface and setNetworkinterface but nithing.) Also I cannot firgure out if the things that I am doing wrong are on the server or the client.
Here is the code for the sever and client.
SERVER
package com.cme.multicastijector.server;
* Title: 
* Description: 
* Copyright: Copyright (c) 2004
* Company: 
* @author not attributable
* @version 1.0
import java.net.*;
import java.util.*;
public class MulticastOutputSocket {
private int m_multicastPort = 0;
private MulticastSocket m_multicastSocket = null;
private InetAddress m_interfaceAddress = null;
private InetAddress m_multicastAddress = null;
private InetSocketAddress m_inetSocketAddress = null;
private int m_bufferSize = 0;
private byte[] m_outputBuffer = null;
private DatagramPacket m_packet = null;
public MulticastOutputSocket(int portNumber,String interfaceAddress,String multicastAddress,int bufferSize) throws Exception{
System.out.println("\nStarting multicast output socket");
m_multicastPort = portNumber;
m_interfaceAddress = InetAddress.getByName(interfaceAddress);
m_multicastAddress = InetAddress.getByName(multicastAddress);
m_bufferSize = bufferSize;
m_inetSocketAddress = new InetSocketAddress(m_multicastAddress,m_multicastPort);
m_multicastSocket = new MulticastSocket (m_multicastPort);
// m_multicastSocket.joinGroup(m_inetSocketAddress,NetworkInterface.getByInetAddress(m_interfaceAddress));
m_multicastSocket.setNetworkInterface(NetworkInterface.getByInetAddress(m_interfaceAddress));
// m_multicastSocket.setLoopbackMode(false);
// m_multicastSocket.setTimeToLive(32);
Enumeration e = NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces();
while (e.hasMoreElements()){
System.out.println(e.nextElement().toString());
System.out.println("Interface Address = " + m_interfaceAddress);
System.out.println("Multicast Address = " + m_multicastAddress);
System.out.println("Port = " + m_multicastPort);
System.out.println("BufferSize = " + m_bufferSize);
System.out.println("MulticastSockect initialized.\n");
public void sendData(String data) throws Exception{
m_outputBuffer = new byte[m_bufferSize];
m_outputBuffer = data.getBytes();
//m_packet = new DatagramPacket(m_outputBuffer, m_outputBuffer.length);
m_packet = new DatagramPacket(m_outputBuffer, m_outputBuffer.length, m_inetSocketAddress);
m_multicastSocket.send(m_packet);
public void closeSocket() throws Exception {
//m_multicastSocket.leaveGroup(m_multicastAddress);
//m_multicastSocket.leaveGroup(m_inetSocketAddress,NetworkInterface.getByInetAddress(m_interfaceAddress));
m_multicastSocket.close();
CLIENT
package com.cme.multicastijector.client;
* Title: 
* Description: 
* Copyright: Copyright (c) 2004
* Company: 
* @author not attributable
* @version 1.0
import java.io.*;
import java.net.*;
import java.util.*;
public class MulticastClient {
private Properties m_prop = null;
private MulticastSocket m_multicastSocket = null;
private InetAddress m_interfaceAddress = null;
private InetAddress m_multicastAddress = null;
private InetSocketAddress m_inetSocketAddress = null;
private int m_multicastPort = 0;
private int m_bufferSize = 0;
private int m_previousSeq = 0;
private boolean m_isFirst = true;
private int m_actualseq = 0;
private int m_msgLost = 0;
private int m_messagesReceived = 0;
private Object m_seqLock = new Object();
private Object m_msgLock = new Object();
public MulticastClient(Properties properties) throws Exception{
m_prop = properties;
init();
new TpsCalculator();
receiveData();
private void init() throws Exception{
m_multicastPort = Integer.parseInt(m_prop.getProperty("MULTICAST_PORT"));
m_multicastAddress = InetAddress.getByName(m_prop.getProperty("MULTICAST_ADDRESS"));
m_interfaceAddress = InetAddress.getByName(m_prop.getProperty("INTERFACE_ADDRESS"));
m_bufferSize = Integer.parseInt(m_prop.getProperty("BUFFER_SIZE"));
m_inetSocketAddress = new InetSocketAddress(m_multicastAddress,m_multicastPort);
m_multicastSocket = new MulticastSocket (m_multicastPort);
// System.out.println("DEFAULT INTERFACE : " + m_multicastSocket.getInterface() );
// System.out.println("DEFAULT INTERFACE : " + m_multicastSocket.getNetworkInterface() );
// m_multicastSocket.setInterface(m_interfaceAddress);
// m_multicastSocket.setNetworkInterface(NetworkInterface.getByInetAddress(m_interfaceAddress));
// System.out.println("DEFAULT INTERFACE : " + m_multicastSocket.getInterface() );
// System.out.println("DEFAULT INTERFACE : " + m_multicastSocket.getNetworkInterface() );
m_multicastSocket.joinGroup(m_inetSocketAddress,NetworkInterface.getByInetAddress(m_interfaceAddress));
// m_multicastSocket.joinGroup(m_multicastAddress);
System.out.println("Interface Address = " + m_interfaceAddress);
System.out.println("Multicast Address = " + m_multicastAddress);
System.out.println("Port = " + m_multicastPort);
System.out.println("BufferSize = " + m_bufferSize);
private void receiveData() throws Exception{
try {
String received = null;
byte[] inputBuffer = null;
DatagramPacket packet = null;
while(true){
inputBuffer = new byte[m_bufferSize];
packet = new DatagramPacket(inputBuffer, inputBuffer.length, m_inetSocketAddress);
m_multicastSocket.receive(packet);
received = new String(packet.getData());
m_messagesReceived++;
synchronized(m_seqLock){
m_actualseq = getSequence(received);
checkSequence(m_actualseq);
catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
m_multicastSocket.close();
private int getSequence(String data){
return Integer.parseInt(data.substring(0,15));
private void checkSequence(int actual){
if(m_isFirst){
m_isFirst = false;
m_previousSeq = actual;
else{
if ( (m_previousSeq + 1) != actual) {
synchronized(m_msgLock){
m_msgLost += (actual - m_previousSeq)-1;
m_previousSeq = actual;
private class TpsCalculator extends TimerTask{
private Timer aTimer;
private int previousSeq = 0;
private int tpsSeq = 0;
private int tpsRec = 0;
private boolean first = true;
private int msglost = 0;
private int previousMsgRec = 0;
private int actualMsgRec = 0;
public TpsCalculator(){
aTimer = new Timer();
aTimer.scheduleAtFixedRate(this,new Date(),1000);
System.out.println("#####################################################");
System.out.println("time,tps from sequences, actual tps,total msg received,msglost");
public void run(){
actualMsgRec = m_messagesReceived;
tpsRec = actualMsgRec - previousMsgRec;
previousMsgRec = actualMsgRec;
if(first){
synchronized(m_seqLock){
previousSeq = m_actualseq;
first = false;
else{
synchronized(m_msgLock){
msglost = m_msgLost;
m_msgLost = 0;
synchronized(m_seqLock){
tpsSeq = m_actualseq - previousSeq;
previousSeq = m_actualseq;
System.out.println(new Date()+","+tpsSeq + "," + tpsRec + "," + m_messagesReceived + "," + msglost);
Thanks for your help.
This is really important for the project I am working on.
Thanks again

never Mind I found the issue
The default value for TTL is 1.
I was going thru multiple routers so I incremented the value and it worked
thanks

Multi-master over WAN ?

When will Multi-Master over WAN being supported ?
Will it be in 5.2, and when will this release
being distributed ?

Yes...it'll be in 5.2 which is scheduled for the end of the calendar year (around December...).
A beta version will probably be available sooner (may be just to selected customers though).
Regards,
Ludovic.

Does turning off DHCP remove option to Share Hardisk over WAN?

I'm a recent Apple convert. I have a new Macbook and have downloaded all recent updates.
I just integrated the Airport Extreme Base Station into my current home network. I have DHCP turned OFF in the AP because I am running a netgear router in my basement that is already connected to my Cable Modem. It needs to stay in the loop because I am using it to feed my XBox360, due to the issues related the Base station/360 interaction.
Here is my question... Does having DHCP turned off in the AP, remove the checkbox option in the "Disks" section of Airport Utility toolbar to "Share disks over Ethernet WAN port"? Its MISSING completely. I've seen many instructions that reference that phrase, but the only checkbox I have on that screen is one for using Bonjour. I want to connect a usb drive so I can have a central storage so my wife and I can share itunes/photos/documents. So could it be that option disappeared due to turning off DHCP or is there some other issue?

If you want to share your disks over WAN then you need to do the following:
1. Assign a manual IP address for your AirPort. You can do this by running AirPort Utility and under Internet you need to change Configure IPv4 from Using DHCP to Manually.
2. You need to port forward TCP port 548 on your main router to the IP address you assigned your AirPort. After doing this you will be able to access your AirPort disks by going to Finder, Connect to Server, and entering afp://<yourgatewayipaddress> You can find your gateway IP address by going to www.whatismyipaddress.com while on your home network.

Guest Wireless access over WAN

Hello Everyone,
We have around 45 remote location , all are connected with GRE Tunnels.
44 location have there own WLC which are managed by NCS and ISE in HQ , All 44 location have Wireless access for Guest and INternal Staff.
Now my Question is :
One location(45th) have only 10 users and I dont want to put a WLC there.
How can I provide the Guest wireless access on this location over WAN from HQ.
We can buy APs.
Please give me some ideas to solve this problem.
Here I am attaching my default plan :
Thanks

You just configure the access point in FlexConnect mode and then on the guest SSID you would central switch the WLAN. Central switching tunnels back traffic to the WLC and local switching drops traffic off at the local site. Here are some guides to look at.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-24082
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11635/products_tech_note09186a0080b7f141.shtml
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Cisco WLC in High Availability over WAN

Hi my name is Ivan i have a trouble perhaps could you help me...
I have two cisco wlc 5508. I wan to install them in two differents site. One WLC in the site A and the another WLC in the site B.
Site B is the WAN of the site A. The site A is the headquarter.
But i need to configure them in High Availability. For example if the Cisco WLC in site A goes down, the ap's have to registered in the WLC of the site B.
Then the traffic LWAPP have to pass over the WAN between site A to site B.
I have to configure two cisco wlc in HA over a WAN . Please could help me to do this?. Is ok configure the roamming L3 intercontroller?
Thanks for your answers
Regards
Ivan,
AP'S - WLC - SITE A ----WAN-----WLC - SITE B - AP'S
WLC SITE A DOWN = AP'S SITE A REGISTERED IN WLC SITE B

Hi Surendra thanks for yoru answer.
Surendra, if the ap in the site B (in the WAN) goes down then the traffic lwapp have to pass over the wan,
what will should i do to ensure access point can register on to the cisco wlc in the WAN, moreover to configure the mobility groups in both wireless lan controllers?
or i only have to configure in the wlc the mobility groups? Could you explain me what things have i to do to ensure this
SITE A - (ACCESS POINT M) - LWAPP -----PASS OVER WAN---- SITE B - CISCO WLC - (ACCESS POINT M)
STATUS: REGISTERED IN SITE B
Thanks for your answer
IVAN
Regards

Vlans over wan

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for