Vnc = cpu 100%
using vnc in mac, and if your vnc windows is keep repainting, even that windows is not the current screen, the cpu will still 100%
This is very indicitive of a virus. Either that or you are riunning multiple high graphic programs at once or you dont have enough RAM for your needs. My bet is on the virus though.
Verify at: http://verify.CompTIA.org
Daniel Lamory
COMP001005331608 August 18, 2006
KCSLF55DJ3EQ52JB
Similar Messages
-
CPU 100% When Playing Minecraft iMac
Hi There!
As the title says, "CPU 100% When Playing Minecraft". Every time I boot up Minecraft the Fan becomes loud. I have another iMac (Late 2013) Model and it runs Minecraft fine with all the same settings. So I don't really no what to do. But if you could help me try to get the CPU usage down or maybe turn the fan down? Or something like that that would be great!!
My iMac Specs.
Mac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014)
Processor: 4 GHz Intel Core i7
Memory: 32 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
Graphics: AMD Radeon R9 M295X 4096 MB
So Yeah, if you could give me a hand, I would be so much appreciated!
Thanks!Firefox 3.6.6 Windows XP - often goes to 80-100% CPU even with only one tab open (in this case the one I'm writing this message on). When this happens the only cure is to kill it with task manager and start again.
-
Sony mw600 a2dp avrcpagent mac air os 10.8.2 cpu 100%
sony mw600 a2dp avrcpagent (mac air 4,2 2011 mid) os 10.8.2 cpu 100% ? why..?
sony mw600 a2dp avrcpagent (mac air 4,2 2011 mid) os 10.8.2 cpu 100% ? why..?
-
G580(20150) CPU 100%
При добавлении или уменьшении гровкости, а так же яркости экрана с помощью кнорки Fn +нужная стрелочка вылазит сообщение. В заголовке написано "Energy Managment", сообщение внутри окна"CPU 100%" и кнопка "OK". Посмотрев по диспетчеру задач процессор не загружается на 100 процентов, а просто выскакивает окно. Которое мешает постоянно. Как исправить? Спасибо заранее за ответ.
Приветствую
Никаких других идей, кроме удаления и переустановки драйвера Lenovo Energy Management лично у меня нет. Вы не назвали ОС, для win8.1, например, есть два разных релиза, для разных платформ ноутов. Для 20150:
http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/products/laptops-and-netbooks/lenovo-g-series-laptops/lenovo-g580-notebook/20150/downloads/DS037135 -
Hello
I have S10-2 with Windows 7 Home edition. Problem is when I have open 2 or three windows explorer and maybe 2 google chrome windows CPU goes to 100%. Is there some controller problem or something else. Same problem if I copy some files from USB removable disk to my local disk and open internet explorer. Again CPU 100%
Thanks for answers
MarkoHi and welcome...
agreed ... depends on memory, energyprofile, and usage of background tasks (there are a few
Quote "" Same problem if I copy some files from USB removable disk to my local disk""
... USB to HDD transfer is indeed a huge process for our Intel N270/945 combo ...
where a C2D have enough power ... our N270/945 comes to sweat ... if you get him more tasks, while usb transfer to hdd, so give them a bit time
.. its a netbook not a subnote or note .... some times we forgot this..
because all other things is nearly managed with same performance with this small device ...
sincerely KalvinKlein
Thinkies 2x X200s/X301 8GB 256GB SSD @ Win 7 64
Ideas Centre A520 ,Yoga 2 256GB SSD,Yoga 2 tablet @ Win 8.1 -
一个查询语句执行时占用单核CPU资源100%,请帮忙分析原因。
SQL及执行计划如下:
*** 2012-08-29 11:46:25.764
WAIT #9: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 16994971 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660142349078
STAT #7 id=1 cnt=3 pid=0 pos=1 obj=0 op='HASH GROUP BY (cr=8283188 pr=0 pw=0 time=75576024 us)'
STAT #7 id=2 cnt=3 pid=1 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=8283188 pr=0 pw=0 time=22207347 us)'
STAT #7 id=3 cnt=20138 pid=2 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=58213 pr=0 pw=0 time=503569 us)'
STAT #7 id=4 cnt=20138 pid=3 pos=1 obj=16923 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID REAL_XS_BMSDHZ (cr=17935 pr=0 pw=0 time=161196 us)'
STAT #7 id=5 cnt=20138 pid=4 pos=1 obj=16925 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_REAL_XS_BMSDHZ_SP (cr=205 pr=0 pw=0 time=20201 us)'
STAT #7 id=6 cnt=20138 pid=3 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=40278 pr=0 pw=0 time=263247 us)'
STAT #7 id=7 cnt=20138 pid=6 pos=1 obj=16308 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_BM (cr=20140 pr=0 pw=0 time=130059 us)'
STAT #7 id=8 cnt=3 pid=2 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=8224975 pr=0 pw=0 time=75131469 us)'
STAT #7 id=9 cnt=3 pid=8 pos=1 obj=16309 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN BM_BMDM (cr=8224972 pr=0 pw=0 time=75063047 us)'
STAT #7 id=10 cnt=12084 pid=9 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=8204832 pr=0 pw=0 time=74863852 us)'
STAT #7 id=11 cnt=3452523 pid=10 pos=1 obj=16924 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN PK_REAL_XS_BMSDHZ (cr=1287698 pr=0 pw=0 time=34756285 us)'
STAT #7 id=12 cnt=12084 pid=10 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=6917134 pr=0 pw=0 time=36180549 us)'
STAT #7 id=13 cnt=3452523 pid=12 pos=1 obj=16308 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_BM (cr=3464611 pr=0 pw=0 time=17895710 us)'
=====================
PARSING IN CURSOR #5 len=985 dep=0 uid=36 oct=3 lid=36 tim=1314660142349798 hv=3549420567 ad='fb568520'
SELECT C.BMDM,
C.DEPT_NAME,
A.XSSD1,
A.XSSD2,
0 XSJE,
0 XSBS,
0 YHJE,
0 XSJE_BHQ,
SUM (A.XSJE) OLD_XSJE,
SUM (A.YHJE) OLD_YHJE,
SUM (A.XSJE - A.YHJE) OLD_XSJE_BHQ,
SUM (A.XSBS) OLD_XSBS,
0 COMPARE,
0 KDJ,
0 OLD_KDJ,
0 KDJ_BHQ,
0 OLD_KDJ_BHQ
FROM REAL_XS_BMSDHZ A, BM B, BM C
WHERE A.DEPTID = B.DEPTID
AND SUBSTR (B.BMDM, 1, 4) = C.BMDM
AND A.JZRQ = '2012-8-22'
AND NOT EXISTS
(SELECT 1
FROM REAL_XS_BMSDHZ Z1, BM B1
WHERE Z1.XSSD1 = A.XSSD1
AND Z1.DEPTID = B1.DEPTID
AND SUBSTR (B1.BMDM, 1, 4) = C.BMDM
AND Z1.JZRQ = '2012-8-23')
GROUP BY C.BMDM,
C.DEPT_NAME,
A.XSSD1,
A.XSSD2
END OF STMT
PARSE #5:c=0,e=186,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660142349795
EXEC #5:c=0,e=128,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660142350084
WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660142350130
WAIT #5: nam='gc cr block 2-way' ela= 394 p1=129 p2=25709 p3=1 obj#=16923 tim=1314660144811060
*** 2012-08-29 11:47:46.104
FETCH #5:c=80317790,e=78455566,p=0,cr=8283188,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660220805742
WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 3424 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220809320
WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220809468
FETCH #5:c=0,e=78,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=2,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660220809529
WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 12233 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220821911
=====================
在fetch阶段出现耗费大量CPU等待时间,这是为何?
环境:
OS:
lsb_release -d
Description: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 8)
数据库版本:
SQL> select * From v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Productionbf01</oracle/admin/bfdb/udump>$cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 3
siblings : 4
core id : 12
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4270.34
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 8
siblings : 4
core id : 32
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.12
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 4
siblings : 4
core id : 16
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.11
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 15
siblings : 4
core id : 60
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.08
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 4
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 3
siblings : 4
core id : 13
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.00
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 5
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 8
siblings : 4
core id : 33
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.22
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 6
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 4
siblings : 4
core id : 17
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.06
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 7
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 15
siblings : 4
core id : 61
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.10
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 8
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 3
siblings : 4
core id : 14
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.12
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 9
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 8
siblings : 4
core id : 34
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.21
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 10
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 4
siblings : 4
core id : 18
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.08
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 11
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 15
siblings : 4
core id : 62
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.09
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 12
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 3
siblings : 4
core id : 15
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.01
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 13
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 8
siblings : 4
core id : 35
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.07
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 14
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 4
siblings : 4
core id : 19
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.13
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 15
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 15
siblings : 4
core id : 63
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.11
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: -
[GNOME 3.4] gnome-shell overview search + gnome-documents - CPU 100%
Hello
When I type something in the gnome shell overview my CPU goes to 100% for a few seconds even after I left the overview.
The process which is taking my CPU is : gjs-console
With gnome 3.4 you can search for documents via the gnome shell overview, this search is based on gnome-documents. So I tried dis-installing gnome-documents and the problem was solved.
I don't know if it's a bug... but if the gjs-console really is the documents overview search process, it's strange that it doesn't stop when I leave this overview.
What do you think ? Should I report it as a bug ? Arch bug / upstream bug ?
PS : By the way, the gnome-shell extension "tracker-search" is faster and, I think, better for finding documents via the overview.This behaviour is the same in my box but I don't think it's an arch bug but an upstream issue (its not a bug formally speaking)... maybe it should be reported to the gnome-documents team in order they do more polish to it.
Best, -
Slow throughput Ironport S370 Proxy CPU 100%
We have a cluster of 3 x Ironport S370's all running 7.7.0-753
The throughput is really poor we have a 500Mbps Internet connection which at it's peak is only getting to 120Mbps as the Ironports don't seem to be able to handle the traffic.
The Proxy CPU% is always close to 100% but the overall CPU is usually at no more than 30% at times it can take up to 60 seconds to load the initial page particularly if the site is an HTTPS site.
We have
22 Identities
62 Access policies
6 decryption Policies
Our maintainer says that having this number of Identities / policies should not be an issue but I have my doubts.
Can anyone advise as it's really become a major issue, Output from the rate and status commands are below.
%proxy reqs client server %bw disk disk
CPU /sec hits blocks misses kb/sec kb/sec saved wrs rds
99.00 285 373 1293 1193 26484 21838 17.5 550 100
99.00 286 209 1313 1335 28682 24532 14.5 635 80
99.00 285 182 1323 1359 37083 33529 9.6 1351 0
100.00 231 132 1051 1113 34816 34151 1.9 355 0
98.00 253 161 1171 1195 39668 37236 6.1 1363 0
99.00 294 256 1225 1469 51371 43304 15.7 1117 40
96.00 346 525 1166 1763 31882 23300 26.9 1328 0
98.00 302 228 1258 1534 30385 25565 15.9 1302 0
99.00 295 149 1200 1597 26253 22888 12.8 816 0
98.00 275 199 1020 1536 35237 31443 10.8 838 0
99.00 288 184 1131 1574 35019 26688 23.8 1433 0
99.00 262 116 1073 1437 24744 23228 6.1 1306 0
105.00 307 292 1165 1610 24249 20236 16.6 1061 0
Status as of: Thu Oct 16 08:28:10 2014 GMT
Up since: Wed Oct 15 15:21:19 2014 GMT (17h 6m 51s)
System Resource Utilization:
CPU 28.2%
RAM 82.6%
Reporting/Logging Disk 16.0%
Transactions per Second:
Average in last minute 266
Maximum in last hour 296
Average in last hour 118
Maximum since proxy restart 296
Average since proxy restart 9
Bandwidth (Mbps):
Average in last minute 25.461
Maximum in last hour 49.605
Average in last hour 16.400
Maximum since proxy restart 49.605
Average since proxy restart 1.365
Response Time (ms):
Average in last minute 179
Maximum in last hour 526
Average in last hour 192
Maximum since proxy restart 17710
Average since proxy restart 3165
Cache Hit Rate:
Average in last minute 16
Maximum in last hour 25
Average in last hour 7
Maximum since proxy restart 25
Average since proxy restart 0
Connections:
Idle client connections 1276
Idle server connections 1170
Total client connections 1638
Total server connections 1890In the release notes it states...
IMPORTANT: During testing of AsyncOS 7.7.0, Cisco observed performance changes ranging from +
33% to - 16%, depending on the model and configuration. Performance degradation risk is limited to
S160 & S360 models and models S370 and S660 that are running the web proxy without security
services. If you experience performance degradation with AsyncOS 7.7.0, Cisco recommends that you
revert to AsyncOS 7.5.x.
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/security/wsa/wsa7-7/Release_Notes/WSA_7-7-0_Builds_after_725_Release_Notes.pdf -
[linux] 9.0.115.0 causes CPU 100% with firefox
The 9.0.115.0 version of FlashPlayer causes 80-100% CPU
consumption with latest Firefox on linux.
The only solution I found, I get back to the 48... Can you
fix it? Can you help me?I have the same problem with 9.0.115.0 in Linux.
I have posted a bug-report to Adobe support last week - no
reaction yet.
Good site for testing is:
http://www.lanik.us/misc/ff-flash-test.html -
Pages 5.1 Fluctuates between 0.6% CPU & 100% CPU
I have only used Pages a few times. I recently got iWork when I upgraded to Mavericks. I designed a template that looks exactly like a college ruled notebook so I can visualize ruled pages.
There are about 36 objects, which are a set of GROUPED & LOCKED horizontal blue lines and one vertical red line and are not obstructed or moved by text.
Now when I begin to write or type on the page after I've saved as template, I can usually get about 5 words or so in before I get that spinning pinwheel / beach ball. The spinning lasts about 2 minutes.
At this time, I open the Activity Monitor and watch what occurs. The % CPU goes from 0.6 - 100% when this occurs. It also says in the Process name that the application is (Not Responding) while it spins.
I am not sure if this is an autosave thing that is occurring or not. I have saved a file directly on the Desktop as well as iCloud, and it seems that this occurs in both forms of working on Pages.
I have done simple procedures like quit app, restart / shutdown computer, etc to no avail. I would like to continue to use Pages, but this is completely not acceptable.
Any suggestions?
Cheers,
jeffThanks, mate, thought that might be an issue, but didn't want to believe that was the case.
How does one spend any time at all working in Pages if they truly used what it is designed for - adding objects / images, etc. - without feeling like they've timewarped back to 133mHz computers?
It is bizarre, because I set the object as static objects and not to be manipulated by the text. Is it still doing a calculation even though they are fixed vector lines? I would think that the LOCKED option eliminates that factor and sees it sort of as a flattened object in the background, no?
It's truly painful. I can type on my iPhone with much less issues. -
ITunes 10.5 has three processes that hog CPU 100%
Since I updated iTunes to 10.5, there are three proceses that hog the CPU to 100% and everything comes to a screaching slow mode. These are APSDaemon.exe, MDCrashReportTool.exe, and AppleMobileDeviceSerivce.exe. Even when I close iTunes, these processes keep running and continue to hog the CPU.
I am running Window XP on an IBM (Lenovo) Thinkpad T60 machine with 2GB Ram and T2500CPU @ 2.00GHz.
What are these processing doing that takes so much CPU poawer. Before iTunes and iPad updates, they use to function properly.When I called Apple Support to ask about the 100% CPU usage, they wanted to charge me because my Ipod was out of warranty. I insisted on talking to someone and finally got to talk to a software engineer for free. He said that he had never heard of the problem in his three years at Apple. Nonetheless, he sounded really interested and suggested that it might be a conflict with anti-virus software. I deleted the antiviruse and that DID NOT HELP AT ALL.
It seems as if Apple could care less. There is no official response. Their primary response is to look at the Forum. At least you find out that the problem isn't your fault, it really is Apple!!!!
So far the best solution is just to delete iTunes and use Mediamonkey to sync your pod.
Apple, please fix this!!!!! -
ASE freeze with CPU 100% and IO 0%
Hi,
I have a production ASE server using 30 CPU's that's is "freezing" several times in the last week (requiring an machine reboot) and from the last sysmon taken we see that the first 4 cpu are 100% with IO 0%.
Engine Busy Utilization CPU Busy I/O Busy Idle
Engine 0 100.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
Engine 1 100.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
Engine 2 100.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
Engine 3 100.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
Engine 4 100.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
Engine 5 44.5 % 19.7 % 35.8 %
Engine 6 62.4 % 24.7 % 12.9 %
From SysWaits we see that event 29 (waiting for regular buffer read to complete) is high when we experience this problem.
No change was reported and the users and saying the system to be in the overall slower in the last weeks.
The version is the old 12.5.4 with the latest patch available and the OS is HP-UX.The machine has 256Gb of memory.
As anyone experienced a behavior like this?
ThanksHi Ricardo
I have seen this when underlying storage changed from raw SAN devices to NAS file system devices.
tempdb writes after a certain amount of volume queued up in a serial way choking the whole server.
This may or may not be what is happening on your server.
Having said that : If this is not something new then what was the last change in your case ?
Especially related to storage
Wait event 29 is related to storage and I/O.
Avinash -
Hey, I've got this weird problem of cpu random spikes to 100% and computer barely reacts.
few facts - opened the laptop clean the fan and make sure it's functional,
the 100% cpu is not always, but when it is the laptop is not under big pressure,
computer overheated a few (around 2-4) times the past month (probably because I blocked the heatsink),
the most interesting one is that, I can't say for sure, but when I unplug the computer from charging it works better, not sure 100% that's the case, didn't leave it for long in that state as the battery drains rather quickly.
Checked cpu stats.. cpu temp is around 50~70 celcius.(check when plugged in, when plugged out it didnt change right away.. no idea if it did eventually)
Appreciate any helpitayu
Welcome to the HP Community Forum.
You know, it could be anything -- and there are so many, many posts about this...
Grab a search word and search a bit for your favorite.
One of my favorites and one that I have not posted for a while:
You might be plagued with the Indexing service going nuts in the background.
If poorly configured, this service can indeed eat up resources and make you think your computer is processed by gremlins.
Pull open the Task Manager and check to see what is running -- see if the Indexing service is running like crazy in the background.
You can change the parameters on the Index to control when it runs, what it checks, how many folders it runs against.
Change advanced indexing options
Improve Windows searches using the index: frequently asked questions
Click the Kudos Thumbs-Up to say Thank You!
And...Click Accept as Solution when my Answer provides a Fix or Workaround!
I am pleased to provide assistance on behalf of HP. I do not work for HP.
Kind Regards,
Dragon-Fur -
Oracle.exe and java.exe are running my CPU 100% under XP Prof SP3
11gR1
oracle.exe and java.exe are running 100% CPU
I have increased virtual memory to 4 gig
I have defragmented the drive.
I checked the drive for errors.
I am searching the whole drive for viruses
I do not have the problem with Redhat Fedora 12 running 11gR1
I have 1 gig of RAM but cannot install release 2 because the installer expects
1 gig + 1ooops!!! left that off...sorry
XP Prof SP3 32 bit..*.no problem with Redhat Fedora 12 running MySQL and 11gR1*
1 gig RAM Dell precision W/S 1.5 Gig rate 74 GiG SCSI HD 15000 RPM
Don't pass out but I am also running MySQL server 5.1.41 and MS SQL Server Express 2008.
Lucky it didn't catch fire
I installed XP prof months ago but this CPU domination occurred only starting last night!
However slow everything works in 11gR1
sqlplus myname/password and then select rows from table
sqldeveloper
PHP web sites
I've had plenty of trouble with Java running slow and hogging memory!
Edited by: landonmkelsey on May 2, 2010 12:21 PM
Edited by: landonmkelsey on May 2, 2010 12:24 PM
Let me guess...stop services for MySQL and MS SQL Server and see what happens!
Edited by: landonmkelsey on May 2, 2010 12:26 PM -
I have 9 Domain Controllers 2012 (not R2) and one DC 2008R2 in one Domain. Damain has 5 sites. There are some trusted domains. All DCs are VirtualMachines on VmWare. Damain and Forest tevel - 2008R2.
All 2012 DCs have the same problem. WinRM load CPU on 100% and DC doesn't answer on requests, ping works, RDP try connecting but can't sign-in. The problem appear randomly (not simultaneously) on all DCs. DC 2008R2 works good.
I dasabled WinRM on all DCs and users can works but I need WinRM.
Thanks!Hi,
Here is an article below about how to troubleshoot
high CPU usage on a Domain Controller:
Troubleshooting High CPU Usage on a Domain Controller
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727054.aspx
If there are many client computers connecting to the DC when the issue occurs, please apply this hotfix below:
High CPU usage on a Windows Server 2012-based server when many client computers connect to the server
http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2830448
In addition, here is a thread below which has a similar issue, please follow Elad’s reply to see if it works for you:
SVCHOST - DNS Client High CPU Utilization
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/d2a2ad2d-a406-410c-9b7a-e22104fd2e2e/svchost-dns-client-high-cpu-utilization?forum=itprovistanetworking
Best Regards,
Amy
Maybe you are looking for
-
System Center TechNet Guru Announced for June 2014
The Results are in! And the winners of the TechNet Guru Competition June 2014 have been posted on the Wiki Ninjas Blog. Below is a summary, heavily trimmed to fit the size restrictions of forum posting. BizTalk Technical Guru - June 2014 Steef-Jan
-
RV325 Router: Adding a wireless access point for wireless printer
Hi all, I am trying to add a Linksys ea6350 wireless router to the RV 325 router with the goal of having a wireless printer on the network. I can connect wirelessly to the router and access the internet; PC's that are on the wireless router can find
-
I can't see what my edits are doing to the develop module , its shows the filmstrip picture getting edited buts its a 3/4 inch square. The develop module picture show nothing until i switch to a different pic in the filmstrip section and go back to s
-
I followed all the instructions indicated on Note 1292919.1. The form will run and ask to download the latest Java Plug in. So I know it is not pointing to Jinitiator. The Java Plug in was installed as indicated in note 1292919.1 before running the f
-
TO_LOB() function in Forms 6i
Hi there, I'm trying to use the to_lob() function in a form which should convert long datatype to clob datatype. But when trying to compile my coding I get the error message "identifier TO_LOB must be declared". I'm using Forms 6.0.8.12.1 with Oracle