Volume issues with third-party tele-conference service

A client is requried to join a conference call hosted by third-party Genesys Conferencing (866.436.3797). My client accesses the teleconference through the speakerphone of their Cisco SPA525G2, lcoated in a Board Room.
They have a UC-540 with the next to lates firmware and they have no other volume issues with any call on this or any other speakerphone.
Any ideas?

You could try this link here it will show you how to use the HH off another router as a slave and still be able to use BB talk
(If I have helped you in any way to say "Thank You" please click on the star next to the message. Thank You)
If I have solved your Issue please click the "Mark as accepted solution" button.

Similar Messages

Anyone else having issues with third party changers saying "this accessory not supported". I get it every time I plug my phone. It only started after the iOS 7 updates

Anyone else having issues with third party changers saying "this accessory not supported". I get it every time I plug my phone. It only started after the iOS 7 update?

That's because part of iOS7 had code in it to look for and recognize unsigned cables.
In other words, Apple knew that people used non-signed ones and didn't care....until last month when they decided to care. People with iOS6 and lower should experience no issues (unless Apple patches those iOS versions) but folks with iOS7 will need to deal with it.

Mavericks compatibility issues with third party displays

I just upgraded from mountain lion to os x mavericks v10.9.3. I use a three-year-old macbook pro with two peripheral third-party displays, each of which is connected to a Diamond adapter which I connect to a Belkin hub that connects to the computer. I had no problems with Mountain Lion after I upgraded from Snow Leopard once I downloaded the Diamond adapter drivers lost in the upgrade.
Now that I've upgraded to mavericks, only one of my two peripheral displays is receiving a signal. An apple tech advisor suggested that mavericks might be incompatible with the Belkin hub. I haven't been able to reach Belkin on this as yet.
Anyone experience this issue and have a fix for it?

The [Note 1051764 - GEN: Skip employee for 3PR evaluation|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1051764] may help you.
Regards,
Raymond

Serious Issue with "third party subscriptions" through text messages.

Forgive me for perhaps sounding dramatic. After having this experience I nearly paid the fee to break my contract and quit on cell phones all together. If apple gets the iPhone to a point where no cellular carrier is neccessary I will be the first to join the party. I'm going to start trying this skype thing this weekend. Anyway, I digress, here's what happened. I get my bill from AT&T and there is a charge for download activity for $3.99. Not the end of the world but I call the number to find out what the charge is all about because I thought I had an unlimited data plan. Turns out AT&T calls it a third party subscription fee. I argued that if AT&T is charging it on my bill as far as I'm concerned I'm not concerned about the details, I hold AT&T responsable for what they put on my bill. According to AT&T's rep I recieved a text message asking me if I wished to subscribe to their service. I don't do the text thing so I never read any message like this. HERE'S THE KICKER - BECAUSE I DID NOT RESPOND TO THE TEXT TO SAY NO THANKS I WAS AUTOMATICLY ENTERED INTO AN ILLEGAL CONTRACT TO PAY $3.99 MONTHLY FOR A SERVICE I'M NOT EVEN AWARE OF. I was absolutly irate. The ramifications are astronomical. This means I could get a limitless unexpected bill. I look at it this way: If I had to write a letter, address an envelope, and lick a stamp every time I got an advertisement in my snailmailbox, I would never get out of the house and I would have to get on welfare to afford the stamps. To me there is an obvious legal precidence here. I realize that this has more to do with AT&T than Apple. I simply want to emplore Apple to save us from a world of disintigrating business ethic. Cellular providers have gotten completely out of control. When I feel like I need a lawyer just to call AT&T to discuss the inconsistency of my bill there is a serious problem. I feel like entering into a contract with a cellular provider endangers my financial stability in a fragile era. It just seems rediculous for a business to become so arogant that they can speak nonsense to a customer and we are put in a position to defend against such nonsense. Several of my friends have run into the same issue with text third party subscriptions. Last night at a dinner party three indicated that they finally had all the cellular provider crap they could take and they canceled their iPhone service and put it up on ebay. I love my iPhone, it is the most useful piece of technology I have ever had the pleasure to enjoy. That being said, I cannot justify, as a household provider with a family depending on me, taking the risk of financial ruin (a $3000+ cell phone bill could do just that) initiated by arogant buisiness practaces that resemble the oppression I have witnessed through 12 years of military service in places with an excess of sand. I think it is apauling. I believe the FCC and FTC need to be brought into this. I intend to submit formal complaints to both and would encourage others that feel like I do to do the same.

Not to diss those trying to be helpful, but the do not call list has nothing to do with spam TXT messages sent from a computer, which is where the OP's problem probably began.
If a third party sent this message and then signed the OP up for a service he did not want, this violates any number of consumer laws and can be addressed that way. It's unclear whether this is really an AT&T issue at all, absent any evidence that it is their message or their service. It sounds to me like the CS reps do not understand the problem and are giving the not-helpful generic answer about spam TXTs. A much better solution is to set the SMS filters using AT&T's web site.
Similar scams work on landlines, where you can accidentally end up getting a huge charge on your phone bill for something that has nothing to do with the carrier.
I'd call the state consumer protection department.
-dan

Issue with Third Party Adapter for custom JCA Connector in Oracle 11g.

Hi,
For a proof of concept, I have created my own JCA Connector. I have deployed this connector in Weblogic and it works as expected.
Now I am trying to call the JCA Connecter from the SOA Bus. For this I have create a SCA Composite with a simple Web Service to expose the composite, a Third Party Adaptor to wrap the JCA Connector and a Mediator to wire the Web Service and the Third Party Adapter together. For the Third Party Adapter I have created both the needed *.wsdl and _3P.jca file my self. The problem is that I could not find any documentation about the _3P.jca file, and it looks like it that this file is new for 11g.
After some puzzling and debugging I am able to deploy the SCA Composite with the Third Party Adapter. Though when I test the exposed Web Service with the Enterprise Manager I get errors and a stack trace. The problem is that the Record Converter I have created receives the default XMLRecord implementation (oracle.tip.adapter.fw.record.XMLRecordImpl) and not the implementation of the XMLRecord I have created my self.
So the question is does anybody know how to configure the Third Party Adapter so that it will use my custom implemenation of the XMLRecord interface (oracle.tip.adapter.api.record.XMLRecord) instead of the default implementation of the XMLRecord (oracle.tip.adapter.fw.record.XMLRecordImpl).
I would suspect that it should be configured in the _3P.jca file, though I don't know how. The following is the content of the current _3P.jca file I am using.
<adapter-config name="DiskAdapter" adapter="Disk Adapter" wsdlLocation="JCADiskConnector.wsdl"
                xmlns="http://platform.integration.oracle/blocks/adapter/fw/metadata">
<record-converter className="com.osc.jcaadapter.convert.DiskRecordConverter"/>
<connection-factory location="jndi/diskcf" adapterRef=""/>
<endpoint-interaction operation="Send" portType="Send_ptt">
    <use-record-converter addonNamespace="http://somecomp.com/DiskAdapter"/>
    <interaction-spec className="com.osc.jcaadapter.impl.DiskInteractionSpecImpl">
      <property name="FunctionName" value="do-it"/>
    </interaction-spec>
</endpoint-interaction>
</adapter-config>So I am hoping that some one knows how you should configure the Third Party Adapter so it uses my own implementation of the XMLRecord interface.

Hi Simeon,
That is a good suggestion, and I would certainly try to do that if I was not making a proof of concept. It would solve my problem of not getting the sub class of the XMLRecord.
Though for making my proof of concept I found a 10g example that used sub classes of the XMLRecord, and that is why I wanted to get the same example to work on 11g.
The alternative of passing a parameter through with InteractionSpecs, is an interesting though can not solve this problem. I don't have a problem with the javax.resource.cci.Record, I can determine the implementation of that in the conversion class it self.
The problem is the XMLRecord generated by the Oracle SOA Adapter Framework, some how I need a way to influence that to generate the correct implementation of the XMLRecord.
So your post is certainly helpfull if I was not trying to get this specific problem to work :).
But I am afraid that I will end up in implementing your sugestion.
Regards
Maikel.
Edited by: M. Dierdorp on 13-aug-2010 6:34

IPad photo issues with third party apps

Up until recently I've had no problem with the issue I'm about to describe.
When I download my raw format photos from my camera using the SD card reader I cannot view full photos in any third party apps such as the Photoshop app or any other I've tried. I just get a small thumbnail version, very low res. I can view them fine in the iPad photos app. If I sync my iPad with my computer and put the photos back into the iPad with iTunes they work fine with all my third party photo apps. Any suggestions?

This appears to be a problem that cropped up with iOS 4. Prior to iOS 4, when a third party app would allow a user to browse to a RAW photo, the app would get a jpeg representation that was generally of high resolution.
As of iOS 4, when third party apps get an image from these RAW images through the Photo Library the image that is retuned is of a very low (thumbnail) resolution. In our testing this appears to be limited to RAW images from Nikon cameras. When you sync your iPad the RAW photos are processed and then resync'd as jpegs on your iPad. You'll find these photos will now show up at the expected resolution once they go through the syncing process.
We reported the bug to Apple and have not had any luck in getting any assistance for a work around through Developer Technical Support. They have explained that the iOS always grabs the jpeg preview from a RAW photo's data. Presumably if the particular RAW format does not include a jpeg preview you'd get nothing, but we do not have the data to indicate if there are any formats out there that don't store a jpeg preview as well as the RAW data.
You will find that a couple of third party apps have found some work-around to the issue. To date our only idea has been to access the RAW image directly and parse it for the jpeg preview ourselves. We are hoping the issue is resolved in the next version of the iOS, but don't have any information yet to indicate that it will or will not be.
Good Luck!

BC/Muse syncing issue with third-party code

Hi there, I was hoping someone had a solution to this issue - which is this:
I have used some third party code for a Hotel's 'QuickBook' function on every page. Periodically, this code stops working on some pages, and works on others - mainly when I republish the site via Muse.
I asked the code's developer to look at it and they found this problem:
<form method="post" action="http://fe.avvio.com/convert/site/Clandeboye%20Lodge/index.php" id="c5QuickBook3Fields"></form>
The form effectively begins and ends on the same line.
However, the </form> appears on a completely different line in the code - rather than the wrong place (as indicated above) it appears in excatly the correct place. Does BC 'render' this either in the wrong place, or doesn't recognise it being there at all?
As a temporary fix: When I log into BC and edit the website from the back end, all I have to do is navigate to the offending page where the QuickBook rests, click 'Update' without making any changes at all and it begins working again.
As a workaround this is obvioulsy a bit of a chore, but more importantly it's impossible to tell when, or on what page, this third party code decides not to work!
It's worth pointing out that the third party code seems to be fine - I've had it looked over and it does in fact work continuously on competitor websites I've been checking.
Apologies if it doesn't make sense... honestly, it has me baffled. I might even have to re-word this at a later stage!
Thanks for any help though.

If you have the entire iTunes folder from the old system and have restored this into <User's Music> on the new one then iTunes should treat this as the "home" library for the device. It should sync without removing any content. If not, see Recover your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device.
I suspect the options are greyed out because there are currently no Tones in the iTunes library to sync.
tt2

Issues with Third party program RPURME00

Hi Guys,
SAP has introduced this new program that replaces previous two during third party however on running it saysthat pernr is skipped and nothing gets evaluated and stored.
Any information on this will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Gajanan

The [Note 1051764 - GEN: Skip employee for 3PR evaluation|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1051764] may help you.
Regards,
Raymond

Anyone else having issues with third party routers...

Last week I started having issues with my Asus RT-N66U where certain wireless devices e.g. PS3, Xbox 360, Laptop, etc. have issues connecting to the internet (the PS3 reporting a DNS issue) even after I replaced it with a second rt-n66u.
I then tried using the HH3 I got with BT and have none of these problems.
Back on the Asus I tried a manual DNS (BTs 62.6.40.178 and 62.6.40.162) but these are having issues as well although strangely it will work fine if I use it purely as a wireless access point via the HH3 (With HH3's internal wifi disabled), right now I'm testing it again with Google's DNS but I want to know, is anyone else having any issues?

Is your firmware up to date? http://support.asus.com/Download.aspx?SLanguage=en&m=RT-N66U+%28VER.B1%29&os=8

SGD with Third Party Authentication issue

Hi
I am trying to setup SGD with Third Party Authentication and have done all the requisites for this.
I input the SGD URL and get the Third Party Login page but after I input my credentials, I get redirected to the SGD default login page which should not be the case. I had already set "Tomcat Authentication" as false in server.xml and enabled the Third Party authentication scheme in Array Manger
What else am I missing ?
Kindly advise
SGD ver4.31
Thanks

Every now and then I have found the same. One thing that almost always solved the problem was recreating a new trusted user, you can follow the steps from:
[http://docs.sun.com/source/820-1088/trusted_users.html|http://docs.sun.com/source/820-1088/trusted_users.html]
Especially the step to test the trusted_user is a very good test to see if the trusted user is ok: http://server/axis/services/rpc/externalauth
When prompted, log in as the trusted user.
An other way to test it is via the api-test functionality: http://server/sgd/admin/apitest/
First setup a session: webtopsession->startSession(0)
Then authenticate via externalauth->setSessionIdentity
These steps are the minimal steps to perform 3rdParty Authentication
(There is also an example jsp for 3rd Party Authentication on the wikis.sun: [http://wikis.sun.com/display/SecureGlobalDesktop/Single+sign-on+(before+4.40)|http://wikis.sun.com/display/SecureGlobalDesktop/Single+sign-on+(before+4.40)] )
- Remold

Interface with third party service desk..

Hi,
I am looking into different options to integrate SolMan Service Desk functionality with third party interface.
Scenario includes, <b>sending attachments</b> and <b>receiving attachments</b> through SolMan Service Desk functionality.
Please share/throw some light on the interface. I have already gone through "ServiceDesk_WebServiceAPI" document, but not much info/help in that.
I would really appreciate.
Thanks,
-Mike.

Hi,
This might help you
IDOC/BAPI for SM help desk
Regards
Agasthuri Doss

Third party IP phone services

Any recommendation for third party IP phone services?
I have found two: www.andtek.com and www.berbee.com.
Thanks!

http://web.csma.biz/apps/xml_xmldir.php is another place. It's a phone directory system released under GPL.
It's pretty good, but you'll want to install it in the root of a website and not under a subdirectory. I had issues with the xml output not sending an xml header and had to edit the source to fix this up.

Replace Self-Signed FAST Search Certificate with Third Party Certificate

We are trying to replace the Self-Signed FAST Search Certificate with Third Party Certificate in our SP 2010 environment. And are facing issues while enabling the SSL communication between the FAST servers and the corporate servers.
Our FAST search servers are in a different farm than that of the Corporate Servers.
The details of the certificate we received is as follows:
Issued to : FastSearchCert
Issued By: Issuer Name
Valid From: 4/21/2015 to 4/20/2017
We were able to successfully renew the certificate on the FAST Search Server by following the below steps:
1. Login to the Administrative and the Non-Administrative nodes
of the FAST server. Go to Windows Service and stop the FAST Search for SharePoint and the FAST Search for SharePoint Monitoring services in both the servers.
Follow the below steps in the Administrative Node followed by the Non-Administrative Node
2.
Install the certificate in the following paths in the certificate store:
“Certificates(Local Computer)\Personal”
“Certificates(Local Computer)\Trusted Root Certification Authorities”
3. Ensure that the user account configured for the “FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint” has access to the private key of the certificate.
4. Go the Administrative node of the FAST farm and follow the below steps:
Go to the certificate store.
Expand the Personal folder and then click the Certificates folder. Double-click the third party signed FAST certificate.
Open the Details tab and then click Thumbprint. Note down this thumbprint.
5. Next, open
Microsoft FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint with Administrator
Privileges.
6.
Navigate to the directory, “D:\FASTSearch\installer\scripts” and execute the below command to replace the current certificate with the newly created
third party signed FAST certificate.
.\ReplaceDefaultCertificate.ps1 -thumbprint "certificate thumbprint".
7. The FAST certificate was renewed successfully.
Once the certificate has been renewed successfully in both the nodes, follow the below step:
8. Start the FASTSearch for SharePoint and the FAST Search
for SharePoint Monitoring services in the administrator server.
Next, while enabling the SSL communication between the FAST servers and the other corporate servers, we follow the below steps:
1.
Copy the new certificate from any of the FAST servers to all the web-front end and application servers in the corporate farm, in order to enable SSL communication between these servers and the FAST farm.
2. Also, copy the script
‘SecureFASTSearchConnector.ps1’ from the location “%FASTSearchFolder%\installer\scripts” in the FAST servers
to the web-front end and application servers of the corporate farm.
3. Follow the below steps on each of the servers in the corporate farm:
Open ‘SharePoint 2010 Management Shell’ with administrator privileges and navigate to the directory in which
SecureFASTSearchConnector.ps1’ script is located.
And then, execute the below command:
.\SecureFASTSearchConnector.ps1 -certThumbprint "certificate thumbprint" –ssaName “FASTCibtebtSSA” –username “DOMAIN\SP_Farm”
Where,
-certThumbprint
- Thumbprint of the certificate
-ssaName – FAST Content SSA
-username – The account configured to run the SharePoint
Search Service
On execution of the above command, we receive an error message stating that the "Connection to the Content Distributor servername.corp.abc.org: 14391 could not be validated...instance of FAST search server backend is running"
Please help us resolve this issue. We have not been able to find the cause of the above error for a long time.
Any help is much appreciated.

Your tip on exporting from eDir to locate a missing private key was very helpful. Here are my steps to renew an expired third party certificate when the private key, generated 30 months ago in my case, could not be located.
In iManager, browse the tree and locate the likely certificate object. The Attributes for the object show Subject Name = webmail.acme.com. Selected the certificate and exported to webmailcert.pfx.
Then, the openssl commands in TID 7004039, "How to convert a SSL PFX to a PEM file", were run against the .pfx file to create cert.pem, key.pem and server.key files.
TID 7015500, "How to determine if private key belongs to public key (certificate)", was followed to determine if the public key (downloaded from third party) and private key (just retrieved from iManager) match - they did - that is, the private key converted from webmailcert.pfx matches the downloaded certificate.
TID 7013103, "How to create a .pem File for SSL certificate Installations", was followed to manually create a server.pem file using openssl.
TID 7010584, "How to setup SSL Certificate for Apache", part labeled "Additional Information" was followed to modify /etc/apache2/vhosts.d/vhost-ssl.conf file. Server.pem file created above copied to /etc/apache2/ssl.crt/ and /etc/ssl/servercerts/ directories as specified in vhost-ssl.conf.
Restarted apache2.
www.digicert.com has an SSL Certificate Checker that can be used to verify the installation is successful.

How to integrate single sign on with third party system

we are in the process of implementing istore application. we already have home grown isupport application to contact support personnal for any issues. Now we are wondering how do we integrate oracle applications single sign on with our third pary system. Is there any recommendation provided by oracle to achieve the same.

We too are in the process of implementing iStore with SSO features.
And if you believe me it seems to me as nightmare.
In our scenerio we are intgrating this SSO with Third party access control too (AD and Siteminder). I would request you to please respond me on the following mail id , so we can share our experince which will help us in our implementation
[email protected]
regards and thanks in advance
Vikas Deep

SharePoint 2013 on-premises integration with third party email account

the Email sending issue from SharePoint is causing too much time waste
First let me explain how our SharePoint is deployed
Sharepoint version : 2013
Deployment type : on-premise
Authentication : from Domain controller also hosted locally
domain name ; say domain.com this domain.com is same as our website address hosted on godaddy
SharePoint computer name on local DNS : sharepoint.domain.com
OS and IIS : 2008 r2 , IIS 7.5
Network firewall : 25 26 ports opened for sharepoint , both incoming and outgoing.
Server firewall : turned off
Email configuration Attempts by IIS 6.0
We tried following setting on IIS 6.0 SMTP local server properties
In General tab
qualified name was shown as : sharepoint.dts-solution.com
IP assigned : sharepoint server IP , advanced putted two entries of IP with ports as 25,26
In Access tab
Authentication : selected as Anonymous
Connection : All except below list : empty list
Relay : only the list below , one entry as 127.0.0.1 and other is local static IP of SharePoint server
in Delivery tab
outbound security : Basic authentication : accessed user in AD and given the right password, also checked with annonymous -not working
outbound connection: all default values and port = 25
Advance : fully qualified domain name = sharepoint.domain.com , DNS test showed success, rest every check box unchecked
On sharepoint central management settings
Outbound email = sharepoint.domain.com
from and reply to address = [email protected]
IIS 7.5 SMTP settings
In IIS 7.5 sharepoint application we added SMTP settings as smtp server = godaddy out going smtp , user name as [email protected] , password = godaddy password , port : godaddy outgoing port .
Godaddy account
Our website hosted on godaddy with same name as domain.com
open relay not possible on emails.
Results
After setting alerts on SharePoint sites and assigning tasks with alerts we receive email in queue folder but they never get forwarded. We just wish to use any of our email *.domain.com to send outgoing emails from SharePoint . Its been a while we have no
success.
Tech Learner

Hi,
As I understand, you are using SharePoint 2013 integrating with third party SMTP server which provides email function.
From SharePoint side, I'd suggest you refer to the link below to configure email integration:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee956941(v=office.15).aspx
If you have already confirm that message is sent from SharePoint, while stuck in queue on SMTP server, then the issue might be related to relay on SMTP server. Since the issue is related to third party product, we do not have enough resource here,
I'd recommend you contact their support engineer for more assistance:
https://support.godaddy.com/help/category/154/email
https://support.godaddy.com/help/article/3552/managing-your-email-account-smtp-relays
Thanks for the understanding.
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected] .
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Volume issues with third-party tele-conference service

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for