Volume levels not being sa

Sound card: Sound Blaster Audigy SE 7.
Software: updated recently
Basically I have my volumes set like this- http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i29/FoZZiESS/volumes.jpg
Now, the side left volume is set at 45%. After I have restarted my computer it changes back to what seems like 00% BUT the volume control still says 45%. Its not until i click on it to change it (Note that i only click, this is before dragging it to change volume) I can clearly hear the side left speaker volume drop down to what is obviously the 45% settting.
Why is this? Its not loosing the volume setting as such because the slider is still at 45%.Message Edited by FoZZiE on 2-29-200609:23 AM

By default, there is a –3dB drop in amplitude when mixing in Multitrack View. You can change this behavior permanently under Preferences > Multitrack > Default Panning Mode by choosing Left/Right Cut (logarithmic)
This is based on the concept of Pan Law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_law) which prevents unintentionally loud volume increases when a signal is panned in the center of a stereo field. The Wikipedia link goes into much more detail.

Similar Messages

Sound check (volume leveling) not working newest ipod

Dear Apple community,
Thank you for your help with this problem.
I am extremely disappointed with my new iPod. I have been using iPods for 15 years. Many years ago I solved the problem with volume leveling by using a fantastic program called iVolume. I have over 25,000 songs (collected over 20 years) in my music library and I have never had a problem with the different sound levels when I play them back through my various Ipods and Iphones over the years.
Unfortunately when I recently purchased the latest generation of iPod I quickly found out that volume leveling no longer works. The discrepancy in the sound playback is most apparent when I use the bluetooth connection but is also present even when I play through the audio jack. I have tried turning sound check on and off, and have done a complete reboot of my ipod, and have not seen any difference.
Any help with this problem would be most appreciated.
Sincerely,
David Rojer
Maplewood, NJ
===
Specs:
I am using a Mac with OS X version 10.9.4.
My Itunes is version 12.0.1.26.
My iVolume is version 3.7.4.
My Ipod is model PD478LL with version 1.0.3 Mac.
===

Nevermind I worked it out. Just had to restart iTunes. Classic IT Crowd: "Have you tried turning off and on again?". Lol.

Adobe Audition Volume Levels Not Matching

Hello everyone. I have a quick question and have been looking the answer for quite a while. I seem to not be able to find it thought.
Every time I export let's say a multi track mix down from audition, the volume seems to be lower than the original track. Mind you I have not compressed to a lower format, I always keep everything same as source (which in my case is 48000 Hz, 32-bit, 320kbps CBR) (sometimes I force the entire project to conform to the settings mentioned above by manually choosing them in the export dialog). However, if I play the mix down version of the exported song next to the actual song itself, the original always sounds much louder than my exported file. why is this? This is very frustrating as I feel my mixes aren't coming out to their full quality potential. There is always degradation in volume. I always make sure that my master volume is set to 0db so that it isn't louder or quieter than the original. I have to up the damn master for the entire mix in order for it to sound as loud as the original. I don't want this thought because it messes with my audio levels for some/most of the transitions.
Should I be exporting the mix down as an uncompressed wav, then compressing to mp3 using a different software?
Any insight would be greatly appreciated. And apologies for the noob question.
Thank you

By default, there is a –3dB drop in amplitude when mixing in Multitrack View. You can change this behavior permanently under Preferences > Multitrack > Default Panning Mode by choosing Left/Right Cut (logarithmic)
This is based on the concept of Pan Law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_law) which prevents unintentionally loud volume increases when a signal is panned in the center of a stereo field. The Wikipedia link goes into much more detail.

EA1 - Optimization level not being respected.

It seems that no matter what I define under Preferences->Database->PL/SQL Compiler->Optimization Level, everything is always compiled against optimization level 2.

Cant reproduce. Steps:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE OPTIM_LEVEL0 AS
BEGIN
NULL;
END OPTIM_LEVEL0;
Set Tools->Preferences->PL/SQLCompiler->Optimization Level=0
Press Compile cogwheel toolbutton.
Go to Details tab, witness PLSQL_OPTIMIZE_LEVEL=0
Repeat these steps for level = 1 and 2.

Volume level not what you think

So I don't have any volume problems when it comes to hearing someone when i'm talking to them on the phone. Or when it comes to listening to music via the speaks or through headphones. What does give me problems is when I'm playing a movie that was purchased from itunes.
The sound from that movie is pitifully low. I can max out the volume slider and volume button but it's still low as ****. So I don't know if it's a movie issue or a phone issue

The movie is easy to fix.
In iTunes, highlight the movie, click Get Info(apple-I), click options, and use the volume adjustment slider. That will change the tag, and give you higher volume. Hope that helps you.

ITunes Sound Check (volume levelling) not working with AirPlay?

Playing music from iTunes. Just changed from cable connection to Airport Express. Now the volume fluctuates between songs. Any ideas?

go to:
iTunes
preferences
advanced
highlight the "general" tab
look at the second to last line
uncheck the box
i think that should do it for you
DY
the box is unchecked thanks for the help though

Total Volume of HU Packaging materials/Containers not being updated

Hello Guys,
I've just noticed that when a pack some materials or sub HU into another HU (packaging materials/containers), its total volume is not being updated. Well I assume that the total volume must be the sum of the volume of its contents right? But in my case, the total volume is not being displayed (it shows a value of "zero").
Then I have observed in the material master record of the HU packaging material, the value for its volume is zero and its unit of measure is empty.
Then I check the HU contents (the one that I packed in the HU containers), they have values for their volume, the unit of measure is present as well.
Do you guys have an idea why these behavior occurs? I'm thinking if I could just enter a unit of measure for the HU containers even if the value for the volume is zero. Well I just need some confirmation/validation from you guys.
Thanks for your help!

We use the UOM "EA" in our packaging material master data and the volume is getting updated in the deliveries.
I believe there are numerous setting that must be maintained but I can tell you that we do use UOM for packaging materials

Sometimes my iphone 5S produces low sound even on full volume level. Then i do restart it. But i am not sure where exactly the problem is? Need help.

Sometimes my iphone 5S produces low sound even on full volume level. Then i do restart it. But i am not sure where exactly the problem is? Need help.

Hi saiyed adil,
Thank you for contributing to the Apple Support Communities.
It appears that your iPhone 5s sometimes produces low sound, but a restart corrects it.
It can take some time to isolate and resolve intermittent issues like this one, and I'd recommend going through the steps in this guide the next time it occurs:
If you hear no sound or distorted sound from your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch speaker - Apple Support
All the best,
Jeremy

Why does Find not see a visible file at Volume level?

I recently searched (Find) my iMac's internal hard drive for a file that I knew I had created ("MAC addresses.doc"), but it found no such file, either by File Name or Contents. I had to try to remember where I filed it, and then I found it in [Macintosh HD] > Library > Documentation > User Guides and Information. Searching (Find) again at the level of any folder within the volume, even Library, finds the file immediately, both by File Name and Content. The file has no unusual properties, and its Permissions allow everyone to at least Read it. This occurs even after repairing permissions of the volume. Why should the OS be unable to Find this file for me when searched on the volume name? Should I change some setting/preference in order to allow that (all files to be found at Volume level)?

Thanks Frank,
SYSTEM_PARAMETER is a table owned by X. If I qualify the select statement by adding the owner it works, but of course I do not want to do that. Here is the DDL for creating SYSTEM_PARAMETER:
create table SYSTEM_PARAMETER
name         VARCHAR2(256) not null,
date_value   DATE,
number_value NUMBER,
string_value VARCHAR2(512),
comments     VARCHAR2(512)
alter table SYSTEM_PARAMETER add constraint PK_SYSTEM_PARAMETER primary key (NAME);
Again, if I rewrite the procedure to the following (only difference is the red X.), it works:
create or replace procedure ztm_get_debug_level is
vc_pkg_name system_parameter.name%TYPE := 'DEBUG_LEVEL_PKG_BASE_KEYS';
vn_error     services.debug_log_level.debug_level_id%TYPE := 30;
v_debugLevel   system_parameter.number_value%TYPE;
function get_owner return varchar2 is
    cursor c1 is
    select owner from all_tables where table_name = 'SYSTEM_PARAMETER';
    v_Ret_Val VARCHAR2(30);
BEGIN
    OPEN C1;
    FETCH C1 INTO v_Ret_Val;
    CLOSE C1;
    RETURN v_Ret_Val;
END;
begin
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('AAAA - ' || get_owner);
select s.number_value
into   v_debugLevel
from   X.system_parameter s
where s.name = vc_pkg_name;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('BBBB');
exception
when no_data_found then
    NULL;
when others then
   DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('p_get_debug_level.WHEN OTHERS');
   raise;
end;
This procedure exists in 4 other environments where there are no issues. It can't be a privileges issue as the table is owned by user X and as you can see by the lookup (which was added for debug) against ALL_TABLES the owner is clearly X. So, why can X not select from it's own table unless we include the owner?
Thanks,
Thomas

Parser Error Message: It is an error to use a section registered as allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level. This error can be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an application in IIS.

I've copied a .NET application from an older 2008 server running IIS 7.0.600.16386 to a newer 2008 R2 server running 7.5.7600.16385. The .NET framework version is 4.0.30319. I've setup an application pool and copied the wwwroot directory.
I've checked for nested web.config files and I've been reading a lot about converting the site to an application. The older server running the application is still up and running and the configurations look identical. If I convert the site to an
application the icon changes and doesn't look like it does on the old server. I'm new and still learning the basics of programming and publishing applications. Can someone point me in the right direction? I've been on google for a few days
to no avail. Thanks.
Description:
An error occurred during the processing of a configuration file required to
service this request. Please review the specific error details below and modify
your configuration file appropriately.
Parser Error Message: It
is an error to use a section registered as
allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level. This error can
be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an application in IIS.
Line 20:       <add path="Telerik.Web.UI.DialogHandler.aspx" type="Telerik.Web.UI.DialogHandler" verb="*" validate="false" />
Line 21:     </httpHandlers>
Line 22:     <authentication mode="Forms">
Line 23:       <forms cookieless="UseCookies" loginUrl="~/AccessDenied.aspx" protection="All" name="TVHRFORMAUTH" timeout="180" slidingExpiration="true" />
Line 24:     </authentication>

Hi,
I agree with Tim that we can ask for better help in the following IIS forum.
IIS.NET forum
http://forums.iis.net/
Best regards,
Frank Shen

Item level changes not being updated.

Hi,
I am implementing BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, method BBP_PO_CHANGE.
The problem that I am facing is that whenever, I change anything at the Item level, after the PO has been created, (say for eg item quantity), it is not being updated to the database. I also noticed one thing. When I click on the order button (after changing the item quantity) the import parameter of the BADI it_item of the is empty. Also I am checking in transaction BBP_PD, whether the update has happened.
Thanks in advance
Pete

Hi Yann,
Below is the code in the BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI.
method IF_EX_BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI~BBP_PO_CHANGE.
CLASS cl_exithandler DEFINITION LOAD.
DATA: LV_CUF_BADI TYPE REF TO IF_EX_BBP_CUF_BADI, "ZCL_IM_SRM_TANDC_BADI, ",
LV_CUF_BADI_ACTIVE.
DATA: IV_MODE   TYPE xfeld,
        IS_CUF_HEADER TYPE BBP_PDS_HEADER,
        IS_GETDET_HEADER TYPE BBP_PDS_PO_HEADER_D,
        ES_UPD_HEADER TYPE BBP_PDS_PO_HEADER_D,
        IS_UPD_HEADER TYPE BBP_PDS_PO_HEADER_U,
        LV_CHANGE TYPE C,
        IS_ITEM TYPE BBP_PDS_ITEM ,
        IS_ACC TYPE BBP_PDS_ACC,
        IV_DOC_TYPE TYPE CRMD_ORDERADM_H-OBJECT_TYPE VALUE 'BUS2201',
        LV_INCLUDE_NAME TYPE DD03P-TABNAME VALUE 'INCL_EEW_PD_HEADER_SSF_PO',
        LT_DDIC TYPE DD03TTYP,
        LV_REPID TYPE SY-REPID,
        LV_DYNNR TYPE SY-DYNNR,
        I_HEADER LIKE IS_CUF_HEADER,
        GV_CLAUSE_ID(256) TYPE C,
        LV_FLAG(1),
        LV_IMP(1),
        LS_COUNTER(1),
        LS_COUNT(1),
        LS_NUMB(1),
        LS_GUID(32),
        LS_GUID_INIT(32),
        LS_GUID_BLANK(32) TYPE C VALUE SPACE,
        LS_NUMB_BLANK(1) TYPE C VALUE SPACE,
        LS_CNT(1),
        LV_UCOMM(4),
        EV_OKCODE TYPE SY-UCOMM.
DATA: WA_PDHSC TYPE BBP_PDHSC,
WA_PDHSC_SEL TYPE BBP_PDHSC,
*wa_it_item type BBPT_PD_PO_ITEM_ICU,
WA_IT_ITEM TYPE BBP_PDS_PO_ITEM_ICU,
wa_et_item TYPE BBP_PO_ITEM_BADI,
WA_HCF TYPE BBP_PDS_HCF_PO.
LS_COUNTER = LS_COUNTER + 1.
IF SY-UCOMM = 'SAVE'.
IMPORT LV_TEXT TO LV_IMP FROM MEMORY ID 'TEXT'.
LV_IMP = LV_IMP + 1.
EXPORT LV_TEXT FROM LV_IMP TO MEMORY ID 'TEXT'.
ENDIF.
IF SY-UCOMM = 'CHEC' OR SY-UCOMM = 'ENT1' OR SY-UCOMM = 'SAVE' OR SY-UCOMM = 'LIST'.
GET PARAMETER ID 'NUMB' FIELD LS_NUMB.
IF LS_NUMB IS INITIAL.
    MOVE IS_HEADER-GUID TO LS_GUID_INIT.
    MOVE LS_COUNTER TO LS_COUNT.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'GUID' FIELD LS_GUID_INIT.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'NUMB' FIELD LS_COUNT.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING IS_HEADER TO I_HEADER.
IMPORT LV_TEXT TO LV_IMP FROM MEMORY ID 'TEXT'.
IF SY-UCOMM = 'SAVE' AND LV_IMP = 2.
CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
EXPORTING
exit_name = 'BBP_CUF_BADI'
IMPORTING
act_imp_existing = LV_CUF_BADI_ACTIVE
CHANGING
instance = LV_CUF_BADI.
MOVE SY-UCOMM TO LV_UCOMM.
LV_REPID = 'SAPLZSRM_CUST_SCREEN'.
LV_DYNNR = '1001'.
GET PARAMETER ID 'GUID' FIELD LS_GUID.
IF LS_GUID NE IS_HEADER-GUID.
I_HEADER-GUID = LS_GUID.
ENDIF.
CALL METHOD LV_CUF_BADI->PUT_DATA
EXPORTING
          is_header             = I_HEADER
          is_item               = IS_ITEM
          is_acc                = IS_ACC
          iv_doc_type           = 'BUS2201'
          iv_include_name       = lv_include_name
          iv_mode               = IV_MODE
          it_dd03p              = lt_ddic
          iv_caller_dynnr       = '1000'
          iv_caller_repid       = SY-REPID
        IMPORTING
          ev_repid              = LV_REPID
          ev_dynnr              = LV_DYNNR.
CALL METHOD LV_CUF_BADI->GET_DATA
    IMPORTING
      ev_okcode = EV_OKCODE
    CHANGING
      es_header = I_HEADER
      es_item   = IS_ITEM
      es_acc    = IS_ACC.
ENDIF.
WA_PDHSC-GUID = IS_HEADER-GUID.
WA_PDHSC-ZZ_OPT_TERM_COND = I_HEADER-ZZ_OPT_TERM_COND.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING IS_HEADER to ES_HEADER.
MOVE IT_PARTNER TO ET_PARTNER.
loop at it_item into wa_it_item.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING wa_it_item to wa_et_item.
append wa_et_item to et_item.
endloop.
MOVE IT_ACC TO ET_ACC.
MOVE IT_HCF TO ET_HCF.
MOVE IT_ICF TO ET_ICF.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING WA_PDHSC TO WA_HCF.
APPEND WA_HCF TO ET_HCF.
IF LV_UCOMM = 'SAVE' AND LV_IMP = 2.
SELECT * INTO WA_PDHSC_SEL FROM BBP_PDHSC WHERE GUID = IS_HEADER-GUID.
ENDSELECT.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    UPDATE BBP_PDHSC SET ZZ_OPT_TERM_COND = WA_PDHSC-ZZ_OPT_TERM_COND WHERE GUID = IS_HEADER-GUID.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'GUID' FIELD SPACE.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'NUMB' FIELD SPACE.
    CLEAR LV_IMP.
    EXPORT LV_TEXT FROM LV_IMP TO MEMORY ID 'TEXT'.
ELSE.
    INSERT INTO BBP_PDHSC VALUES WA_PDHSC.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'GUID' FIELD SPACE.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'NUMB' FIELD SPACE.
    CLEAR LV_IMP.
    EXPORT LV_TEXT FROM LV_IMP TO MEMORY ID 'TEXT'.
ENDIF.
COMMIT WORK.
ENDIF.
endmethod.
Let me know if you need any clarifications.
Thanks,
Pete

Document type with posting level 12 not being carryforward

Hi gurus,
We are now implementing SEM-BCS 6.0 in the BI 7.0 server.
We have a document type u201CMIu201D which properties are:
Posting level: 12
Balance check: 0 error when balance note equal to zero
Application: Other
Posting: Manual posting
Inversion: No automatic inversion
The problem is that when we execute the Balance Carryforward in the subsequent year this is the only document type that is not being carryforward.
Why is this happening?
Thanks for your help.
Best regards.

This is by design
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/0c/ab0240536fe369e10000000a155106/content.htm
"Data records for preparatory postings for consolidation group changes are neither translated nor carried forward."
I'll try an example...
Company A is sold from company 1 to company 2 in June (EoP)
For periods 0 - 6:
BCS reports company A's balance sheet under company 1
BCS reports company A's income statement under company 1
starting period 7
BCS reports company A's balance sheet under company 2
BCS reports company A's 0 - 6 income statement under company 1
BCS reports company A's 7 income statement under company 2
this is managed through the posting level 02 12 and 22 document types, as well as PL30 if using CoI.
Assuming the period of first consolidation and period of divestiture were set correctly in the groups for company 1 and company 2, BCS wants to read all 0 - 6 data under group 1 and all 7 + data under group 2. This is obviously incorrect from an accounting standpoint and the PCC postings correct that.
So BCS books a PL02/12/22 in group 1 to zero out the balance sheet. It then books another set of entries in group 2 to write up the entire balance sheet in the new group.
However, once you get to the end of the year and run your BCF, the entire balance sheet is now sitting in period 0. The system is able to report company A's balance sheet under group 2 withou the aid of the PCC documents. Therefore, the system does not roll these documents forward into the new year.
The PCC documents were only required because of the periodic nature of the BCS data storage vs. the LTD nature of the balance sheet for reporting. Once the full LTD balance is available in a single period, as is the case just after a BCF, the PCC documents are no longer required.
Anyway, hope that made some sense. If not, I'd encourange you to create an Excel sheet replicating how BCS stores the data in the cube, perfrom a divestiture, and see why the system is not carrying forward the documents. This is how I came to understand it.
Now, if you're doing something "non-standard" with the PL12, all bets are off
Good luck,
Chris

HP 4120 Lync Phone Edition - Ringer Volume Level Can Not be controlled when a second call comes in for a workflow

Here is the scenario we are experiencing with our HP 4120 Lync phones running the latest available firmware (4.0.7577.4455)
1) A User has an HP 4120 phone and is a member of a workflow/response group which is setup with attendant routing method.
2) The ringer volume is set to the minimum level by the user
3) When a single call comes in to this user, the ringer volume level works as expected
4) When two calls come in at the same time to this users phone, the ringer volume set by the user is ignored and the ringer plays at Maximum volume.
This is causing disruptions to our office environment as we are unable to reliably control the volume levels of the ringers.
There does not appear to be anything more in the settings/menus of the phones themselves. I am thinking this may be an issue with the firmware, but if anyone else has any suggestions, they would be appreciated.
Thanks!!

Hi,
Did the issue also happen before update to the latest firmware?
Did the issue only happen for Response Group call or also happen for basic calls?
If the issue only happen after updating to the latest firmware, it can be the issue of the firmware.
As there is call delay for Lync IP Phone to be a agent of the Response Group. So you can try to use Lync desktop to instead for better performance.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Can not change the input volume level of a track

I mean the buton for the volume in the track information window, between "Input" (Mono/Stereo) and "Monitor"
It is on the lowest level and not highlighted, so I can't move it.
On my iBook I got an older version of GarageBand 2, there I can change the input volume, but I want to use the iMac because I use an external Microphone.
I don't think its got something to do with the mic, I've tried different settings, with the line in, and the internal mic, but this input volume level bar ist never highlighted.
What's wrong?

http://www.thehangtime.com/gb/gbfaq2.html#volumesliderdimmed

I can not control volume levels with headphones

I tried lot's of models but none of them let me control volume levels. Since the xperia z 3 is a big phone and I carry it in my pocket all the time, sometimes it's really hard to reach the phone to lover or increase the music level. It's a big shame that sony doesn't think of it.... Please help me if u know any headphone models that allows volume control. Thnx

That's a great suggestion @viridis
@suffer666 you might want to consider smartweart, either a SmartWatch2 or SmartBand or SmartBand Talk or SmartWatch 3
http://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/products/smartwear/
"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." Kurt Cobain (1967-1994)

Volume levels not being sa

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for