VPC consistency check error

I have 2 Nexus 5548 switches. I'm facing issues on VPC status down and consistency check not performed.
Below is the output.
vPC status
id     Port        Status Consistency Reason                     Active vlans
216    Po216       down* Not         Consistency Check Not      -
                          Applicable Performed
C5548SH02(config-if)# sh vpc brief
Legend:
                (*) - local vPC is down, forwarding via vPC peer-link
vPC domain id                   : 100
Peer status                     : peer adjacency formed ok
vPC keep-alive status           : peer is alive
Configuration consistency status: success
Per-vlan consistency status     : success
Type-2 consistency status       : success
vPC role                        : secondary
Number of vPCs configured       : 93
Peer Gateway                    : Enabled
Peer gateway excluded VLANs     : -
Dual-active excluded VLANs      : -
Graceful Consistency Check      : Enabled

Hi Sushil
It seems your vpc peering is perfect but there is some problem with the port channel configuration (po216). It would be nice to share the configuration. The port configuration must be same on both switches part for physcial interface.
sh run interfac po216
sh run inter ethernet "physical port number "
see port configuration on following example
sw01# sh running-config inter po 12
!Command: show running-config interface port-channel12
!Time: Mon Oct 6 12:19:53 2014
version 5.2(1)N1(7)
interface port-channel12
description data
switchport access vlan 2106
spanning-tree port type edge
vpc 12
sw02# sh run inter po 12
!Command: show running-config interface port-channel12
!Time: Mon Oct 6 12:20:46 2014
version 5.2(1)N1(7)
interface port-channel12
description data
switchport access vlan 2106
spanning-tree port type edge
vpc 12

Similar Messages

Global Consistency Check Errors after RPD Merge: 38120 and 38015

Dears
Can anyone of you point me to a documentation explains Global Consistency Check error numbers in details ?
After merging 2 RPDs, it gives me the following errors: 38120 and 38015
Thanks

38120: Dimension xyz is not associated with any table(s)
Comments: I checked this Dim table and did find tables associated with it. Don't know how else to check ?
38015: Physical tables "<ABC>"."Fact - abc" and "<ABC>"."Dim - lmn" have multiple joins. Delete new foreign key object if it is a duplicate of existing foreign key.
Comments: I did check the joins between this Fact and Dim table and found only 1 join.

N5k, vPC consistency check

hi all,
I got a pair of 5548, vPC works great. However the vPC consistency check show the two switch configs are different! I don't know why vPC still works fine. See the below output of the show vpc consistency-parameters global command. it's weird that from output of each switch, the local value is different from peer value, but if you just see the local value from both switch, they are the same. what's going on here?
thanks
ming
N5k-1# show vpc con g
    Legend:
        Type 1 : vPC will be suspended in case of mismatch
Name                        Type Local Value            Peer Value
QoS                         2     ([], [], [], [], [],   ([], [], [], [], [],
Network QoS (MTU)           2     (1538, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) (1538, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Network Qos (Pause)         2     (F, F, F, F, F, F)     (1538, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Input Queuing (Bandwidth)   2     (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)   (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Input Queuing (Absolute     2     (F, F, F, F, F, F)     (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Priority)
Output Queuing (Bandwidth) 2     (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)   (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Output Queuing (Absolute    2     (F, F, F, F, F, F)     (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Priority)
STP Mode                    1     Rapid-PVST             Rapid-PVST
STP Disabled                1     None                   None
STP MST Region Name         1     ""                     ""
STP MST Region Revision     1     0                      0
STP MST Region Instance to 1
VLAN Mapping
STP Loopguard               1     Disabled               Disabled
STP Bridge Assurance        1     Enabled                Enabled
STP Port Type, Edge         1     Normal, Disabled,      Normal, Disabled,
BPDUFilter, Edge BPDUGuard        Disabled               Disabled
STP MST Simulate PVST       1     Enabled                Enabled
VTP domain                  2     PERAT8                 PERAT8
VTP version                 2     2                      2
VTP mode                    2     Transparent            Transparent
VTP password                2
VTP pruning status          2     Disabled               Disabled
Allowed VLANs               -     1,8,801-804 1,8,801-804
Local suspended VLANs       -     -                      -
N5k-1#
=====================
N5k-2# show vpc con g
    Legend:
        Type 1 : vPC will be suspended in case of mismatch
Name                        Type Local Value            Peer Value
QoS                         2     ([], [], [], [], [],   ([], [], [], [], [],
Network QoS (MTU)           2     (1538, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) (1538, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Network Qos (Pause)         2     (F, F, F, F, F, F)     (1538, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Input Queuing (Bandwidth)   2     (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)   (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Input Queuing (Absolute     2     (F, F, F, F, F, F)     (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Priority)
Output Queuing (Bandwidth) 2     (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)   (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Output Queuing (Absolute    2     (F, F, F, F, F, F)     (100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Priority)
STP Mode                    1     Rapid-PVST             Rapid-PVST
STP Disabled                1     None                   None
STP MST Region Name         1     ""                     ""
STP MST Region Revision     1     0                      0
STP MST Region Instance to 1
VLAN Mapping
STP Loopguard               1     Disabled               Disabled
STP Bridge Assurance        1     Enabled                Enabled
STP Port Type, Edge         1     Normal, Disabled,      Normal, Disabled,
BPDUFilter, Edge BPDUGuard        Disabled               Disabled
STP MST Simulate PVST       1     Enabled                Enabled
VTP domain                  2     PERAT8                 PERAT8
VTP version                 2     2                      2
VTP mode                    2     Transparent            Transparent
VTP password                2
VTP pruning status          2     Disabled               Disabled
Allowed VLANs               -     1,8,801-804 1,8,801-804
Local suspended VLANs       -     -                      -
N5k-2#

This is related to the following bug
CSCtl06882 - 'show vpc consistency-parameters global' showing incorrect value for QoS
This defect is currently Assigned State but is Cosmetic in Nature, not service impacting. Hence you will have no problem with vpc.
Thanks, Vinayak
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtl06882

Consistency check error in sender file content conversion

Dear Experts,
I am trying one simple File to File scenario in which i have only fields 1>salesorder_number 2>Description
I created a txt file with line items "100,crudeoil" with file name as salesorder.txt
In the sender file adapter i have configured the file convertion paramenters as follows:
Document name : mt_salesorder_sender
Document namespace : http://se.com.sa/sec-sa-qax "Namespace of message type
Recordset Structure : document,*
document.endSeparator : 'nl'
document.fieldSeparator: ,
document.fieldNames : salesorder_number,Description
So after this if i run the scenario In file adapter i am getting the error like "Conversion initialization failed: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: Error(s) in XML conversion parameters found: Parameter 'document.fieldFixedLengths' or 'document.fieldSeparator' is missing Consistency check: no. of arguments in 'document.fieldFixedLength' does not match 'document.fieldNames' (0 <> 2) "
Please let me know where i am going wrong.
Regards,
Santhosh

Hi,
please maintain the order as
Recordset Structure : document,*
document.fieldNames : salesorder_number,Description
document.fieldSeparator: ,
document.endSeparator : 'nl'
Rgds
joel

Consistency check error in OBIEE 10g

Hi
I have the below error while doing consistency check.
I was trying to join two fact tables by complex join, but getting below error
NQSError:15009 Could not load navigate space for subject area
NQSError: 15009 Multiple paths exist to table Plans.Circular joins schemas not supported
Please suggest

If you have to join fact tables in physical, make sure your logical layer remains a star.
Either add both fact tables to one logical fact table source , or create two logical stars, where both facts are joined to all conformed dimensions.
Note: if both facts are not at exactly same granularity, your reports will show incorrect results most definitely. So avoid fact to fact joins.

TDMS consistency check error

We are having problem at "consistency check for the rules".The
rules have been check and all are in green.i remember that SAP has
asked us to check tables CNVMBTRULEINCL and CNVMBTRULEFIPARS right? im
able to browse table CNVMBTRULEINCL but not CNVMBTRULEFIPARS. the error
message shows this table is not active, and i cant even open the table
in SE11/SE16/sm30.
the error message is as below:
x_ekpo|the rule import paramter im_bstyp will not be available for this object.
the same set of rule was used for first client(miq400), but this time its not working for second client(miq485) ..
the source and destination are the same for the first and second client.
thanks

the issue has been fixed in 0799873 2010

Obiee 11g Global Consistency Check Error

Hello all,
I need guidance regarding an error which pops up after the consistency check. However Admin tool lets the rpd to be saved and uploaded to the server, inspite of this error.
The error is as follows:
"the initialization string in the repository initialization block "NAME" contains the use of USER: or Password:"
Any input is appriciated.
Thank you.

Here, you shud use something like this:
Say ur user column us LOGIN in W_DAY_D table.
Then IB sql should be: SELECT DISTINCT LOGIN FROM W_DAY_D WHERE LOGIN = ':USER'
OR
SELECT DISTINCT LOGIN FROM W_DAY_D WHERE LOGIN = 'VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION.USER)'
and also, for ur default initialized may be you can use ur name say 'xxx'
Hope this helps..

Consistency check Error in Administration Tool

Hi I am Ramana,
When I do a consistency check in OBIEE Administration Tool I get the following error:
[nQSError: 15001] Could not load navigation space for subject area SCOTT
Can anyone Tell what is the error

Is this the only error message you got?

Obiee 11g RPD consistency check error after upgrade

Hi,
got below error in RPD consistency check after upgrading from obiee 10g to obiee 11.1.1.6.
*ERRORS:
Business Model Core:
[38028] Logical column Dim - Contact.Age Range does not have a valid data type.*
logical column Age=
CASE WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 18 THEN 'A: <18' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 25 THEN 'B: 18-25' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 35 THEN 'C: 25-35' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 45 THEN 'D: 35-45' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 55 THEN 'E: 45-55' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 65 THEN 'F: 55-65' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" IS NULL THEN 'Unspecified' ELSE 'G: >65' END
above is formula for logical column "Age" and data type for that is varchar in physical
few more erros similar to above.
how can I fix the issue? appreciate for your help.
Thanks
Jay.

HI,
As I said, Age has valid datatype in physical layer but datatype is showing as "Unknown" in logical layer after upgrade to 11g. many other columns got same issue just for this logical table. I rebuild the logical column mapped to physical sources but it didn't fix the issue.
I hope you understand the issue.
Thanks
Jay.
Edited by: Jay on Jul 23, 2012 11:02 AM

Consistency check error 38011: Logical tables from multiple subject areas..

I received multiple 38011 errors when performing a consistency check after merging repositories:
For example:
Logical tables from multiple subject areas associated, OHRP and Enterprise Warehouse
(OHRP and Enterprise Warehouse refer to different business models)
I'm really not sure what this means, and Metalink and Google aren't turning up anything.
Thoughts?
-John

John,
Does it say anything about Assertion Failure? Also, this is straight up from help regarding import (through file menu) "Use this option when the objects you import are unrelated to objects already in the repository such as when the business model and physical layer objects do not exist. If an object of the same name and type exists, the import process overwrites the existing object with the new object. When you import objects from one repository into another, the repository from which you are importing must be consistent."
Sometimes Merge does bring unexpected (and unwanted results) - especially if there're presentation aliases, duplicate business models, or naming conflicts. If it's not too late, I suggest you use Import,rather than Merge, also, preferably starting with a new RPD file. This would enable you to bring items piece-by-piece and hopefully would allow you to isolate the problem.
Also, depending on the size - it's sometimes preferable to just reproduce missing part(s). I hope this is helpful.
Also, I forgot to say - the Import is deprecated and not supported. They suggest you use Project Extract and Merge. If Merge isn't working out for you and Import isn't an option - maybe you could try Project.
Edited by: wildmight on Mar 9, 2009 7:58 AM

Errors occur during executing consistency checks

Hi all,
During my phase"executing consistency checks", errors occur :
X_STXH| Sender structure S_STXB is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXB.
It happened in PC001_PCL_CHECK sub-activity.
The details as follows:
ubactivity PC001_PCL_CHECK was started on 08.03.2009 at 22:10:02 by user LEEE03 | |
Check COBJ started at 08.03.2009 22:10:30 by LEEE03
Check COBJ finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:04 by LEEE03
Check HIER started at 08.03.2009 22:11:04 by LEEE03
Check HIER finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:04 by LEEE03
Check RELS started at 08.03.2009 22:11:04 by LEEE03
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXB is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXB
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXB is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXB
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXB is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXB
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXL is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXL
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXL is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXL
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXL is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXL
Check RELS finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:20 by LEEE03
Check RULE started at 08.03.2009 22:11:20 by LEEE03
Check RULE finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:29 by LEEE03
Check DICT started at 08.03.2009 22:11:29 by LEEE03
X_STXH
Field TDNAME does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
X_STXH
Field TDOBJECT does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
X_STXH
Field TDID does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
X_STXH
Field TDNAME does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
X_STXH
Field TDOBJECT does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
X_STXH
Field TDID does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
Check DICT finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:29 by LEEE03
Check FIMA started at 08.03.2009 22:11:29 by LEEE03
Check FIMA finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:31 by LEEE03
Check RUMA started at 08.03.2009 22:11:31 by LEEE03
Check RUMA finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:31 by LEEE03
Check SELS started at 08.03.2009 22:11:31 by LEEE03
Check SELS finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:33 by LEEE03
Subactivity PC001_PCL_CHECK was completed on 08.03.2009 at 23:11:40 with status ERR
I have searched in sap marketplace and also google, no results come out.
Could anybody help me out?
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Eric Lee

I've implemented the note 1101544 in the central system
executed the report Z_CNVTDMS_08_FIELD_SET with P_PHASE to 'S'.
and after this, I re-executed the activity "Execute Consistency Checks" from the extended mode of the process tree several times.
But it remains the same issue.
Did I miss anything?

The time characteristic consistency check has produced an error DBMAN 62

Hi
We are getting an error while updating to one target as The time characteristic consistency check has produced an error""
* Checked the respective PSA data field which is fine. Dates are in correct format.
* RSRV ran for the particular target. It had error but the jobs were successful till yesterday.
* Data from 01.05.2014 is having the problem ( Which I got from the record number in PSA )
NB: We are running on HANA database but the respective target is not yet HANA Optimised
Details Figures Attached
Any Idea.. What could have gone wrong
Regards
Reshoi R

Hi
Record Number 2995 is shown in the figures attached.
I have already carried out the deletion and automatic repair mentioned in RSCV061 even before posting this question but of no use ( I have shown that also in the figures attached at the posting time.
Reporting is fine. The problem is while loading the data to the cube. The loading is fine till date 30.04.2014 but from the date 01.05.2014. The record is error while updating.
The cube is partitioned from month 01.2008 to 12.2015.
Regards
Reshoi R

Error during currency conversion and consistency check in a sales order

Hi Experts,
I am facing the below error in the sales order. The sales order is having so many items. The below error is coming for few items only. I have checked the currency exchange rates also. All are maintained properly.
Please advice me how to fix this error or which class,methods are responsible for checking the above details while saving the order.
Thanks,
Sri

Hi Christophe,
FYI
Error during currency conversion frm &1 to &2 (date &3, ref. curr. &4)
Message Class - CRM_CUMULATED_I
Message No     - 013
Error during currency conversion for &1 and &2
Message Class - CRM_CUMULATED_I
Message No     - 008
Consistency check: Logical key does not match
Message Class - CRM_CUMULATED_I
Message No     - 011
Thanks,
Sri

Getting error in DB02 after checking Consistency check Unknown objects in A

Dear All,
I have getting error in DB02 after checking Consistency check.
Please find the details.
I have queries.
How to correct the Unknown objects in ABAP Dictionary and Optional index is also we have to create please suggest step by step process.
Missing in R/3 DDIC      1              11
Consistency check of 07.04.2009 10:14:24
-- Objects missing in the database
Primary indexes                  0
Secondary indexes                0
Tables                           0
Views                            0
-- Unknown objects in ABAP Dictionary
|   |-- DB tables                        1
      |-- DB indexes                      11
     |-- DB views                        12
-- DB tables without unique index   1
-- Optional indexes
Too many indexes created         0
-- Indexes not created            145
Regards,

Hi
Check this may help you
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwmobile71/helpdata/en/45/e4ff3e65b66976e10000000a1553f6/content.htm
Regards
Uday

ERROR consistency check in recordset structure validation

Hi,
I have a file that has the format below. The file is managed with the below content conversion parameters. However, it's not working and the error message that i get is "Conversion of file content to XML failed at position 0: java.lang.Exception: ERROR consistency check in recordset structure validation (line no. 7: missing structure(s) in last recordset". Any idea, what when wrong? Thanks.
Message Type defined:
FileHeader            (occurrence = 1)
ARPostingRecord    (occurrence = 1 to unbounded)
    RecordHeader       (occurrence = 1 to unbounded)
    RecordDetail          (occurrence = 1 to unbounded)
Source file looks like this:
01 Field1 Field2...Field-n
H Field1 Field2...Field-n
L Field1 Field2...Field-n
L Field1 Field2...Field-n
H Field1 Field2...Field-n
L Field1 Field2...Field-n
L Field1 Field2...Field-n
where:
01 is the keyfieldvalue for FileHeader
H is the keyfieldvalue for RecordHeader
L is the keyfieldvalue for RecordDetail
Specified parameters:
FileHeader.fieldSeparator
FileHeader.endSeparator
FileHeader.fieldNames
FileHeader.keyFieldValue
RecordHeader.fieldSeparator
RecordHeader.endSeparator
RecordHeader.fieldNames
RecordHeader.keyFieldValue
RecordHeader.missingLastFields
RecordHeader.keepIncompleteFields
RecordDetail.fieldSeparator
RecordDetail.endSeparator
RecordDetail.fieldNames
RecordDetail.keyFieldValue
RecordDetail.missingLastFields
RecordDetail.keepIncompleteFields
ignoreRecordsetName
Recordset Name:
ARPostingRecord
Recordset Structure:
FileHeader,1,RecordHeader,1000000,RecordDetail,1000000

>ERROR consistency check in recordset structure validation (line no. 7: missing structure(s) in last recordset". Any idea, what when wrong?
When you are not sure about number of records for RecordHeader and RecordDetail, Please specify wildchar character. Dont give max numbers. The errors says expecting the specified number for recordset and since it is missing gives errror.

VPC consistency check error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for