VPN Concentrator/ASA question
I have been trying to find a solution to the following scenario for some time but with no luck.
Is there a way I can restrict the Cisco ASA or Concentrator to only accept client connections where the used certificate key usage is Non-Repudiation (or any other keyusage)only!
I realize that this can be done on the client side using the CertmatchKU setting in the vpnclient.ini file but that does not meet my needs of enforcing this on the server side, giving the client no control over this. The client can simply change the ini file or can install the Cisco VPN client on a different workstation and will be able to authenticate using any other certificate type where the keyusage is other than Non-Repudiation. Our Security Policy requires that this certificate type be enforced for VPN connections.
Any ideas or leads will be greatly appreciated.
Hello,
I have exactly the same problem, I'd like to restrict client authentications to certificates having their extended key usage set to non-repudiation.
Do you have any idea how to do this ?
Thanks for your help,
Valery.
Similar Messages
-
PIX, ASA or VPN concentrator & dynamic VPN
Hi all,
I need help what to use and how to do next.
What we need is to create remote VPN for many users so that every user is member of more than one group and every group is linked to predefined set of rules, for instance you can access this IPs, ports and so on.
How to do that dynamically? Is it possible to do that with one certificate?
Other question is what to use? ..PIX, ASA, VPN concentrator ?
BR
jlThe PIX and VPNC are both end of sale products now and unless you already have them your only choice is IOS or ASA. Of those two the ASA is the Cisco preffered platform for Remote Access VPNs.
You can map users to groups using Active Directory OUs, let them select a group at logon, have different logon URLs per group etc. However as far as I know this is not possible:
"every user is member of more than one group "
Some links:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008089149d.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00808bd83d.shtml
With remote access IPSEC VPNs you can either define the groups on the ASA or externally on the ACS Server.
Pls. rate if helpful.
Regards
Farrukh -
Im in the middle of configuring Ip Phone SSL VPN through ASA, got stuck on authentication.. When I enter username and password on the phone screen, i get "Username and password failed" message on the screen. However, in ASA logs I see the following line
Feb 16 2011 15:12:57 725002 85.132.43.67 52684 Device completed SSL handshake with client vpn:85.132.*.*/52684
Feb 16 2011 15:17:26 725007 85.132.43.67 52745 SSL session with client vpn:85.132.*.*/52745 terminated.
What does it mean? How can I turn on debugging to see what is going on?
Thank you in advance!Hi,
If you're not using certificates in client authentication then the SSL handshake will complete before the user is requested to authenticate with username/password. If this authentication request fails you will see the SSL session terminated immediately following this failure (as in the logs you provided). Notice the 5 seconds between the SSL session establishment and termination, this is most likely when the user is being authenticated against the aaa server. If the phone is failing authentication against an external aaa-server you'll want to investigate the logs on that server to determine the root cause of the failure. The ASA can also provide confirmation of the authentication request/reject with the command 'show aaa-server'. If you want to see what's going on at an authentication protocol level you can enable several debugs including "debug aaa authentication|common|internal' and protocol specific debugs such as 'debug radius user|session|all' or 'debug ldap'.
Did this answer your question? If so, please mark it Answered! -
IP Address Assignment on VPN Concentrator through AD
Is it possible to assign an IP address on a per-user basis using Active Directory as your authentication method for a group within the 3000 series VPN Concentrator?
I know this can be done with ACS/RADIUS, but I do not see any documentation on how this can be accomplished using Active Directory as your external authentication server.Sorry for the thread title it should be : "reserver" not reverse.
I have been advised to read the "admin guide"
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a008026f96c.shtml
under the heading below
Assign a Specific IP Address to a User
In order to assign a static IP address for the remote VPN user every time they connect to the VPN 3000 Series Concentrator, choose: Configuration > User Management > Users > Modify ipsecuser2 > identity.
My question i am using production box (to avoid screw up whole system), does it affect if i want to create a specific group and assign specific ip address to a user
On my PIX (VPN running paralled to the PIX, i.e it is not behind nor inforn of the PIX) what I have got these lines of configurations which are related to the VPN concentrator
nat (inside) 1 10.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 0 0,,,,,,,,ip for VPN pool as seen in figure
nat (inside) 1 172.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 0 0,,,,,,,,,not related to VPN
nat (inside) 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 0 0,,,,,,,,,not related to VPN
global (outside) 1 10.1.1.150-10.1.1.155
global (outside) 1 10.1.1.156
route inside 10.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.55.254 1,,,,,,,,,,,,,192.168.55.254, is the VPN Ethernet 1 ip address.
http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/7306/vpnpooleu1.jpg
What I am thinking to do, are below (please any comment) :
1- I want to modify the current group (see my VPN figure ) to be from range 10.2.2.1-10.2.2.9 instead of 10.2.2.1-10.2.2.10
2- Create another group called : " mobile_users "
3- Create a user called : " commuter "
4- Assign the user " commuter " to the group " mobile_user "
5- Assign ip address 10..2.2.2 to the user " commuter "
6- In the cisco site that I have posted , it syas: tick option for " User address from Authentication Server ",,,,I do not think this will apply to me ?
again since I am using production box, I have to assure that the modification above does not screw up the whole system -
We have two 3005 concentrators that need to be replaced.
Is there anything equivilant that will allow for creation of groups, Cisco VPN client, web VPN and is reasonably priced?
What do people generally do for a plug in replacement to the 3005 VPN concentrator?What is generally done about the cost?
At the moment, the PIX firewalls are not EOL.
If I replace the firewalls, just because the 3005 is EOL, will be a large expense correct?
Also, at the moment, the firewall is passing through the traffic to the concentrator in a DMZ.
What is the alternative in the ASA appliance?
And, does the ASA allow for the creation of groups for access like the concnetrator does? -
Looking for help to set up l2tp Ipsec vpn on asa 5055
I am trying to set up a L2tp Ipsec vpn on asa 5055 and I am using windows 8.1 build in VPN client to connect to it. I got the following error. Anyone has experence please help.
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, All IPSec SA proposals found unacceptable!
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, sending notify message
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, constructing blank hash payload
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, constructing ipsec notify payload for msg id 1
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, constructing qm hash payload
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1]IP = 209.171.88.81, IKE_DECODE SENDING Message (msgid=6a50f8f9) with payloads : HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + NONE (0) total length : 84
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, QM FSM error (P2 struct &0xad6946b8, mess id 0x1)!
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, IKE QM Responder FSM error history (struct &0xad6946b8) <state>, <event>: QM_DONE, EV_ERROR-->QM_BLD_MSG2,
EV_NEGO_SA-->QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_IS_REKEY-->QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_CONFIRM_SA-->QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_PROC_MSG-->QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_HASH_OK-->QM_BLD_MSG2, NullEvent-->QM_BLD_MSG2,
EV_COMP_HASH
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, sending delete/delete with reason message
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, Removing peer from correlator table failed, no match!
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, IKE SA MM:d8870fa5 rcv'd Terminate: state MM_ACTIVE flags 0x00000042, refcnt 1, tuncnt 0
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, IKE SA MM:d8870fa5 terminating: flags 0x01000002, refcnt 0, tuncnt 0
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, sending delete/delete with reason message
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, constructing blank hash payload
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, constructing IKE delete payload
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, constructing qm hash payload
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1]IP = 209.171.88.81, IKE_DECODE SENDING Message (msgid=232654dc) with payloads : HDR + HASH (8) + DELETE (12) + NONE (0) total length : 80
Apr 17 22:48:21 [IKEv1]Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 209.171.88.81, Session is being torn down. Reason: Phase 2 Mismatch
I am new to this so I don't know what I should do next. ThanksHere it is. Thanks.
CL-T179-12IH# show run crypto
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5 esp-aes esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp-des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp-des esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA-TRANS esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA-TRANS mode transport
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA-TRANS esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA-TRANS mode transport
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA-TRANS esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA-TRANS mode transport
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-DES-SHA-TRANS esp-des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-DES-SHA-TRANS mode transport
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA-TRANS esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA-TRANS mode transport
crypto ipsec ikev2 ipsec-proposal DES
protocol esp encryption des
protocol esp integrity sha-1 md5
crypto ipsec ikev2 ipsec-proposal 3DES
protocol esp encryption 3des
protocol esp integrity sha-1 md5
crypto ipsec ikev2 ipsec-proposal AES
protocol esp encryption aes
protocol esp integrity sha-1 md5
crypto ipsec ikev2 ipsec-proposal AES192
protocol esp encryption aes-192
protocol esp integrity sha-1 md5
crypto ipsec ikev2 ipsec-proposal AES256
protocol esp encryption aes-256
protocol esp integrity sha-1 md5
crypto ipsec security-association pmtu-aging infinite
crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set pfs group1
crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-3DES-SHA ESP-DES-SHA ESP-AES-128-SHA-TRANS ESP-AES-192-SHA-TRANS ESP-AES-256-SHA-TRANS ESP-3DES-SHA-TRANS ESP-DES-SHA-TRANS
crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set ikev2 ipsec-proposal AES256 AES192 AES 3DES DES
crypto map outside_map 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP
crypto map outside_map interface outside
crypto ca trustpoint vpn
enrollment self
subject-name CN=174.142.90.17
crl configure
crypto ca trustpool policy
crypto ca certificate chain vpn
certificate 2d181c55
308201ff 30820168 a0030201 0202042d 181c5530 0d06092a 864886f7 0d010105
05003044 31163014 06035504 03130d31 37342e31 34322e39 302e3137 312a3028
06092a86 4886f70d 01090216 1b434c2d 54313739 2d313249 482e7072 69766174
65646e73 2e636f6d 301e170d 31353034 31363033 31393439 5a170d32 35303431
33303331 3934395a 30443116 30140603 55040313 0d313734 2e313432 2e39302e
3137312a 30280609 2a864886 f70d0109 02161b43 4c2d5431 37392d31 3249482e
70726976 61746564 6e732e63 6f6d3081 9f300d06 092a8648 86f70d01 01010500
03818d00 30818902 818100bf 797d1cc1 cfffc634 8c3b2a4b ce27b1c9 3fc3e026
4f6cd8f4 c9675aca b5176cef 7f3df142 35ba4e15 2613d34c 91bb5da3 14b34b6c
71e4ff44 f129046f 7f91e73f 2c9d42f9 93001559 ea6c71c1 1a848073 15da79f7
a41081ee b4cd3cc3 baa7a272 3a5fb32d 66dedee6 5994d4b2 ad9d7489 44ec9eb9
44038a2a 817e935f 1bb7ad02 03010001 300d0609 2a864886 f70d0101 05050003
8181002c 6cee9ae7 a037698a 5690aca1 f01c87db 04d9cbc6 65bda6dc a17fc4b6
b1fd419e 56df108f b06edfe6 ab5a5eb3 5474a7fe 58970da3 23e6bc6e 36ab8f62
d5c442bf 43581eb3 26b8cf26 6a667a8b ddd25a73 a094f0d0 65092ff8 d2a644d8
3d7da7ca efeb9e2f 84807fdf 0cf3d75e bcb65ba4 7b51cb49 f912f516 f95b5d86
da0e01
quit
crypto ikev2 policy 1
encryption aes-256
integrity sha
group 5 2
prf sha
lifetime seconds 86400
crypto ikev2 policy 10
encryption aes-192
integrity sha
group 5 2
prf sha
lifetime seconds 86400
crypto ikev2 policy 30
encryption 3des
integrity sha
group 5 2
prf sha
lifetime seconds 86400
crypto ikev2 policy 40
encryption des
integrity sha
group 5 2
prf sha
lifetime seconds 86400
crypto ikev2 enable outside client-services port 443
crypto ikev2 remote-access trustpoint vpn
crypto ikev1 enable outside
crypto ikev1 policy 10
authentication crack
encryption aes-256
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 20
authentication rsa-sig
encryption aes-256
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 30
authentication pre-share
encryption aes-256
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 40
authentication crack
encryption aes-192
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 50
authentication rsa-sig
encryption aes-192
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 60
authentication pre-share
encryption aes-192
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 70
authentication crack
encryption aes
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 80
authentication rsa-sig
encryption aes
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 90
authentication pre-share
encryption aes
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 100
authentication crack
encryption 3des
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 110
authentication rsa-sig
encryption 3des
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 120
authentication pre-share
encryption 3des
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 130
authentication crack
encryption des
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 140
authentication rsa-sig
encryption des
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto ikev1 policy 150
authentication pre-share
encryption des
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400 -
Hi,
Trying to setup VPNc 3005 for WebVPN.
The VPNc is configured with NTP server so
the clock is fine. I installed SSL vpn
client and SecureDesktop software onto the VPNc. Create a local account and
group. When I perform https://vpnc/admin.html, I can manage the
VPNc from the external interface so the
certificate is good.
When I do http://vpnc from the same XP Service Pack 2 workstation, it attemped
to install both ssl vpn client and secure desktop onto my winXP, I have admin privilege on the XP machine, then
it tells me that the vpn concentrator
has a server certificate error. I've
attached the screen shot. Anyone know
what it is? Thanks.If you connect to a website that loads content (such as images) from a second, previously unauthenticated server, the content might not be rendered correctly. WebVPN clientless mode does not support websites that require authentication for access to content from secondary servers. When using WebVPN with NAT-T, do not set the NAT-T port to 443. We recommend using port 80 for NAT-T, as firewalls should allow this.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/vpn3000/vpn3000_41/configuration/guide/webvpnap.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/vpn3000/vpn3000_41/quick/start/gs3mgr.html#wp1302684 -
Remote access VPN with ASA 5510 using DHCP server
Hi,
Can someone please share your knowledge to help me find why I am not able to receive an IP address on remote access VPN connection while I can get an IP address on local DHCP pool?
I am trying to setup remote access VPN with ASA 5510. It works with local dhcp pool but doesn't seem to work when I tried using an existing DHCP server. It is being tested in an internal network as follows:
ASA Version 8.2(5)
interface Ethernet0/1
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 10.6.0.12 255.255.254.0
ip local pool testpool 10.6.240.150-10.6.240.159 mask 255.255.248.0 !(worked with this)
route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.6.0.1 1
crypto ipsec transform-set FirstSet esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
crypto dynamic-map dyn1 1 set transform-set FirstSet
crypto map mymap 1 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyn1
crypto map mymap interface inside
crypto isakmp enable inside
crypto isakmp policy 1
authentication pre-share
encryption 3des
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 43200
vpn-addr-assign aaa
vpn-addr-assign dhcp
group-policy testgroup internal
group-policy testgroup attributes
dhcp-network-scope 10.6.192.1
ipsec-udp enable
ipsec-udp-port 10000
username testlay password *********** encrypted
tunnel-group testgroup type remote-access
tunnel-group testgroup general-attributes
default-group-policy testgroup
dhcp-server 10.6.20.3
tunnel-group testgroup ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
I got following output when I test connect to ASA with Cisco VPN client 5.0
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIVED Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + KE (4) + NONCE (10) + ID (5) + VENDO
4024 bytesR copied in 3.41 0 secs (1341 by(tes/sec)13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 853
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing SA payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing ke payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing ISA_KE payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing nonce payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing ID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing VID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, Received xauth V6 VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing VID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, Received DPD VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing VID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, Received Fragmentation VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE Peer included IKE fragmentation capability flags: Main Mode: True Aggressive Mode: False
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing VID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, Received NAT-Traversal ver 02 VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing VID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, Received Cisco Unity client VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, Connection landed on tunnel_group testgroup
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing IKE SA payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE SA Proposal # 1, Transform # 9 acceptable Matches global IKE entry # 1
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing ISAKMP SA payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing ke payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing nonce payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, Generating keys for Responder...
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing ID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, Computing hash for ISAKMP
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing Cisco Unity VID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing xauth V6 VID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing dpd vid payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing NAT-Traversal VID ver 02 payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing NAT-Discovery payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, computing NAT Discovery hash
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing NAT-Discovery payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, computing NAT Discovery hash
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing Fragmentation VID + extended capabilities payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing VID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, Send Altiga/Cisco VPN3000/Cisco ASA GW VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + KE (4) + NONCE (10) + ID (5) + HASH (8) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NAT-D (130) + NAT-D (130) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 440
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIVED Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + NAT-D (130) + NAT-D (130) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 168
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, Computing hash for ISAKMP
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing notify payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing NAT-Discovery payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, computing NAT Discovery hash
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing NAT-Discovery payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, computing NAT Discovery hash
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing VID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, Processing IOS/PIX Vendor ID payload (version: 1.0.0, capabilities: 00000408)
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing VID payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, Received Cisco Unity client VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, I
[OK]
kens-mgmt-012# P = 10.15.200.108, Automatic NAT Detection Status: Remote end is NOT behind a NAT device This end is NOT behind a NAT device
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing blank hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing qm hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SENDING Message (msgid=d4ca48e4) with payloads : HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + NONE (0) total length : 72
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIVED Message (msgid=d4ca48e4) with payloads : HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + NONE (0) total length : 87
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): Enter!
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, Processing MODE_CFG Reply attributes.
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: primary DNS = cleared
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: secondary DNS = cleared
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: primary WINS = cleared
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: secondary WINS = cleared
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: IP Compression = disabled
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: Split Tunneling Policy = Disabled
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: Browser Proxy Setting = no-modify
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: Browser Proxy Bypass Local = disable
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, User (testlay) authenticated.
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing blank hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing qm hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SENDING Message (msgid=6b1b471) with payloads : HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + NONE (0) total length : 64
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIVED Message (msgid=6b1b471) with payloads : HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + NONE (0) total length : 60
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): Enter!
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, Processing cfg ACK attributes
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIVED Message (msgid=49ae1bb8) with payloads : HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + NONE (0) total length : 182
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): Enter!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, Processing cfg Request attributes
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for IPV4 address!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for IPV4 net mask!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for DNS server address!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for WINS server address!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, Received unsupported transaction mode attribute: 5
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for Banner!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for Save PW setting!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for Default Domain Name!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for Split Tunnel List!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for Split DNS!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for PFS setting!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for Client Browser Proxy Setting!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for backup ip-sec peer list!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for Client Smartcard Removal Disconnect Setting!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for Application Version!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, Client Type: WinNT Client Application Version: 5.0.07.0440
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for FWTYPE!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for DHCP hostname for DDNS is: DEC20128!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: Received request for UDP Port!
Jan 16 15:39:32 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, Duplicate Phase 2 packet detected. No last packet to retransmit.
Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIVED Message (msgid=b04e830f) with payloads : HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + NONE (0) total length : 84
Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing notify payload
Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, Duplicate Phase 2 packet detected. No last packet to retransmit.
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE received response of type [] to a request from the IP address utility
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, Cannot obtain an IP address for remote peer
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE TM V6 FSM error history (struct &0xd8030048) <state>, <event>: TM_DONE, EV_ERROR-->TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_IP_FAIL-->TM_BLD_REPLY, NullEvent-->TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_GET_IP-->TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_NEED_IP-->TM_WAIT_REQ, EV_PROC_MSG-->TM_WAIT_REQ, EV_HASH_OK-->TM_WAIT_REQ, NullEvent
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE AM Responder FSM error history (struct &0xd82b6740) <state>, <event>: AM_DONE, EV_ERROR-->AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG_V6H, EV_TM_FAIL-->AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG_V6H, NullEvent-->AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG, EV_WAIT-->AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_CHECK_QM_MSG-->AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_TM_XAUTH_OK-->AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, NullEvent-->AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_ACTIVATE_NEW_SA
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE SA AM:bd3a9a4b terminating: flags 0x0945c001, refcnt 0, tuncnt 0
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, sending delete/delete with reason message
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing blank hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing IKE delete payload
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing qm hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SENDING Message (msgid=9de30522) with payloads : HDR + HASH (8) + DELETE (12) + NONE (0) total length : 80
Regards,
LayFor RADIUS you need a aaa-server-definition:
aaa-server NPS-RADIUS protocol radius
aaa-server NPS-RADIUS (inside) host 10.10.18.12
key *****
authentication-port 1812
accounting-port 1813
and tell your tunnel-group to ask that server:
tunnel-group VPN general-attributes
authentication-server-group NPS-RADIUS LOCAL
Don't stop after you've improved your network! Improve the world by lending money to the working poor:
http://www.kiva.org/invitedby/karsteni -
VPN Concentrator authentication with multiple domains
I have a hub and spoke network where a T1 comes in to the hub site A and there is a frame relay connection going over to the spoke site B. We want to add a VPN concentrator to site A for remote access but site A and site B have their own domains that are independant of one another. Can I set up the VPN Concentrator to authenticate users that belong to site A domain using site A's domain controller and authenticate users the belong to site B domain using site B's domain controller? That way we can use a single VPN concentrator and a single internet connection but keep the authentication seperate.
Thanks in advance for any help.To authenticate users that belong to site A domain using site A's domain controller you should authenticate users the belong to site A domain using site A's domain controller
-
how to handle multiple site to site IPsec vpn on ASA, any best practice to to manage multiple ipsec vpn configurations
before ver 8.3 and after version 8.3 ...8.4.. 9 versions..Hi,
To my understanding you should be able to attach the same cryptomap to the other "outside" interface or perhaps alternatively create a new crypto map that you attach only to your new "outside" interface.
Also I think you will probably need to route the remote peer ip of the VPN connection towards the gateway IP address of that new "outside" and also the remote network found behind the VPN connection.
If you attempt to use VPN Client connection instead of L2L VPN connection with the new "outside" interface then you will run into routing problems as naturally you can have 2 default routes active at the sametime (default route would be required on the new "outside" interface if VPN Client was used since you DONT KNOW where the VPN Clients are connecting to your ASA)
Hope this helps
- Jouni -
Hi All,
Our problem is, we have Cisco Works LMS 3.0.1. cannot archieve configuration for cisco 3000 series vpn concentrator.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
SamirMake sure you have filled out all of the HTTP/HTTPS credential data in DCR for these devices. RME will only use HTTPS to fetch VPN concentrator configurations.
-
ACS with VPN Concentrator : IP address attribution
Hello,
I need to know if it is possible for ACS to attribute an IP address to the VPN Clients connected to a VPN Concentrator, with XAUTH, instead of the VPN Concentrator,and if yes : how can I do, what is the procedure ? With the attribute Framed IP Address ? Does it work ?
Thanks !
Patriceyes it can be done at works very well under the radius attributes uses the:
[014] Login-IP-Host
NAS Specifies
User Specifies
Other
Check other and then add the ip address that you want to assigned -
Hi,
I'm in the process of migrating some old IOS IPsec VPN configurations from IOS to ASA.
What immediately becomes a problem is that there is no way to virtualize the routing tables on a single ASA. The original IOS setups uses separate VRF:s for each customers and therefore overlapping LAN networks or even VPN pools aint a problem.
This has been in the past avoided (in other ASAs) by using default route for each customer interface on the ASA (with different metric). With this we can have overlapping LAN networks for the customer. Though the limit for the customer links become = metric value range. So basically even if we had an ASA with support for 1000 Vlans we still couldnt use this setup as we would run out of usable metric values for the default routes pointing to the customer links/networks.
So looking at the above situation it seems we would just need to have a load of ASAs with support for 250 Vlans handling each customer groups and not a single ASA which could handle all the VPNs (if theres more than the mentioned approx. 250)
Another option is I guess using a single link on the ASA for all the customer with a tunneled default route and handling the virtualisation on the core device by using PBR to route the packets to different VRF. This in turn would create alot of more configurations on the core device and a single VPN configuration/connection would become harder to manage.
Has anyone run into a similiar situation and how have you handled it? Have you moved to another device manufacturer or sticked with the IOS perhaps? Its unfortunate that the ASA can't handle this by itself.
- JouniHi,
I've heard from our local Cisco contact that L2L VPN is coming. (Though in his words most people were waiting for Client VPN support, as were we) L2L VPN only provides minimal help to our situation as most connections are Client VPN.
Basically the ultimate goal is to eventually migrate all IPsec Client VPN users to start using AnyConnect.
The goal now is to get the old IPsec Client and L2L VPNs of the current device so we can remove the actual 6509/VPN/FWSM device from the network. (Because of the old hardware)
Even though we have newer IOS devices in our network we would rather keep the Client VPN off the IOS devices. So the idea was to quickly move the Client VPNs to ASA and L2L VPN to another IOS device (by moving the L2L VPN peer IP address to the newer IOS device along with the configurations)
We also started considering hosting the VPN services on a more high end device(s) which could support everything we need. In this case the ASA seemed a natural choice. Then again IOS gives alot more flexibility and the most important to us is the ability to virtualise routing.
I've read that AnyConnect VPN has also come to IOS devices.
Quick Google search gives this Cisco document
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080af314a.shtml#intro
How is the AnyConnect on IOS compared to ASA? Would IOS devices at some point (or already?) become a viable option for hosting all the VPNs? (The use of AnyConnect and Clientless VPN has kept us away from continuing with IOS)
Also on another note, I guess I missed one thing when writing the original post.
I guess you can actually use specific routes on the ASA for the overlapping customer networks with different metrics (instead of the default routes with different metrics) This would enable you to handle the routing for more customer links than when simply using default routes towards each customer link with different metric. As now each network range could overlap on 255 customers.
Heres a small sample of a lab configuration of that kind of situation
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description TRUNK
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.1000
description ASIAKAS-1
vlan 1000
nameif asiakas-1
security-level 100
ip address 172.32.100.2 255.255.255.0
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.2000
description ASIAKAS-2
vlan 2000
nameif asiakas-2
security-level 100
ip address 172.32.200.2 255.255.255.0
route asiakas-1 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.32.100.1 1
route asiakas-2 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.32.200.1 2
group-policy ASIAKAS-1-GP attributes
vlan 1000
group-policy ASIAKAS-2-GP attributes
vlan 2000
Basically to my understanding in the above situation the "vlan xxxx" configuration under group-policy defines the eggress interface of the traffic from the VPN and therefore the route for vlan2000/GigabitEthernet0/0.2000 would apply in the case (and provide the next-hop IP) where the VPN user was connecting with a connection using group-policy ASIAKAS-2-GP
I tested this setup and it seemed to work fine. Though this would naturally be an administrative nightmare to manage. (As would be the PBR solution mentioned in the original post)
I'm not sure if I'm making any sense
- Jouni -
Change MTU for just one Site-to-Site VPN between ASAs?
Hi -
I'm setting up a Site-to-Site Cisco VPN between ASAs. I'm being told by the remote site engineer to set the maximum MTU at 1362.
Is it possible to set the MTU for one specific site-to-site VPN on my ASA 5510 Security Plus to MTU 1362? I see my interfeces are all set at 1500.
If not, would you recommend I setup a subinterface on my inside network router and a subinterface on the ASA with an MTU of 1362 to get around this issue? Then use this subinterface for traffic from my inside network to transverse through prior to hitting the VPN.
Thank you.I would not worry too much about UDP traffics. I rather concentrate on TCP traffics because almost all of the issues will be TCP.
Therefore, I would set the MSS value to 1362 or may be like 1300: sysopt connection tcp-mss 1300
That will solve most of your issues. -
I have a vpn 3015, I want my vpn users to be authenticated and authorized to the vpn 3015 throught my Active directory (LDAP).
For Authentication server, I use Kerberos/Active Ritectory Server and it works when I test it.
but for the Authorization Server, I use LDAP server (the same server as the authentication server), with all the parameters like Login DN, Base DN, naming attributes, but when i test it it doesnt work?????why??
ThanksThe VPN Concentrator supports user authorization on an external LDAP or RADIUS server. Before you configure the VPN Concentrator to use an external server, you must configure the server with the correct VPN Concentrator authorization attributes and, from a subset of these attributes, assign specific permissions to individual users. Follow the instructions given here to configure your external server.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008015ce27.html
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to gather schema stats in 11.5.9
Hi, I am trying to gather schema stats for 11.5.9. But schemaname does not have the list of schemas. can i enter ALL. Regards Taher
-
How to set a Default date format.
I would like to know if it's possible to set a default date format (b.e. dd/mm/yyyy) for new date object and not for the current object? Thanks
-
Printer sends extra blank pages
I have an HP all in one Photosmart C7280. Recently, the printer started sending a blank page after ever printed page. This happens whether I am sending a single page document or a multipage document. It happens whether I am printing from any of my
-
Error -1074117754 thrown when sequence tries to initialize PXI-4070
My customer is reporting that when TestStand attempts to initialize hardware at the start of the product test sequences, the system throws an error -1074117754. He believes that it's associated with the PXI-4070 DMM, as he also cannot talk to the ca
-
Drop the Rules of one table from existing bi directional replication setup
Hi All, I have one small question on bi directional replication setup, Its regarding table add in existing replication setup. What happened ,When we add a new table to existing replication setup if any reason table is not replicating between two data