VPN server claims I have multiple local logins

I have successfully been logging in from my home Linux box to the company VPN using AnyConnect with DuoPush for about a month. As of last night I can no longer log in. The AnyConnect client says somethng like, "AnyConnect profile settings mandate a single local user, but multiple local users are currently logged into your computer. A VPN connection will not be established."
I am the only one on this Linux system. I have rebooted. I have forcibly rotated wtmp and utmp logfiles in case AnyConnect was confused by my not logging out when the system had to be shut down in a hurry due to A/C failure. The "last" command shows only me logged in. The "who" command shows me at the console, and on various ptys connected to xterms; I even killed the xterms at one point just to be sure that wasn't confusing it (this should be unnecessary but I was trying everything I could thnik of).
What is AnyConnect looking at that convinces it there are multiple local logins?
Thanks.

Hi,
You cannot use Windows Server Backup to back up file and folders on volumes that require more than 2040 GB (or 2 TB). However, as long as the data size is less than 2 TB, you can perform a file or folder backup.
If you configure windows server backup to backup this 4TB volume to 8TB every 1 hour for period of 12 hours every day, you will get 12 versions shadow copies. You can now use a single backup to back up both the system state and other data on your server. These
system state backups are now faster and require less space for multiple versions because they use shadow copies for versioning, similar to volume based backups, and not individual folders for each version.
Windows Server Backup does not require user intervention to periodically delete older backups to free up disk space for newer backups—older backups are deleted automatically.
For more detailed information, please refer to the article below:
Windows Server Backup Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772523.aspx
Regards,
Mandy
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Similar Messages

Server Intermittently refuses to display local login window - screen saver

Occasionally the local login window refuses to appear after the screen saver has been activated on my 10.5.8 Server, resulting in my inability to access the interface at all afterwards. Other symptoms of the problem are that remote logins (ssh) are also no longer possible because passwords aren't accepted for any user. The password prompt is simply displayed repeatedly in the remote user's terminal until the tries are used up, and this happens whether or not the password was entered correctly. In other words remote login is no longer possible because no password is accepted. Because of this, the computer must be forcibly restarted to achieve recovery, which has to be done locally, of course, by either holding in the power button or disconnecting power to the computer. The log entries that seem to coincide with the occurrence of the problem appear to refer to a screen saver crash. The next workaround solution I intend to try is to prevent screen saver activation altogether. What are possible causes for this? Thanks.

Removing the following two files and reinstalling the latest server combo update were recommended by the article to which you referred.
~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.desktop.plist
~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.preference.desktopscreeneffect.plist
I performed those steps and am still observing in order to establish whether or not they have provided a complete remedy. I haven't observed any occurrences of the problem since performing these steps, but the problem is quite intermittent, and the server remains configured to restart once every 24 hours. My next step is to remove the scheduled restart configuration so that the server runs continually. If the problem hasn't returned at all after a few weeks of continuous operation, then I'll consider the question answered. Thanks!

RRAS - VPN Server and Client have same subnet

Hello,
We have a VPN server setup in RRAS on our 2008 R2 server. The VPN works fine. Clients can connect and get to resources on our server fine.
The issue is that one client has a subnet of 192.168.1.0/24 and the subnet our server uses is also 192.168.1.0/24.
When the client connects, he can get to resources on our server. However, he needs to be able to get to an IP address of 192.168.1.4 using Remote Desktop that is on his local network. He also needs to get on IP 192.168.1.3 via Remote Desktop on the remote
network.
Is there a way we can accomplish this without changing subnets?

For anyone else who needs an answer to this, this is the batch file I created using these links:
http://pastebin.com/HV2GmDAk
http://superuser.com/questions/788924/is-it-possible-to-automatically-run-a-batch-file-as-administrator
Here is the content of it:
REM --add the following to the top of your bat file--
@echo off
:: BatchGotAdmin
REM --> Check for permissions
>nul 2>&1 "%SYSTEMROOT%\system32\cacls.exe" "%SYSTEMROOT%\system32\config\system"
REM --> If error flag set, we do not have admin.
if '%errorlevel%' NEQ '0' (
    echo Requesting administrative privileges...
    goto UACPrompt
) else ( goto gotAdmin )
:UACPrompt
    echo Set UAC = CreateObject^("Shell.Application"^) > "%temp%\getadmin.vbs"
    set params = %*:"=""
    echo UAC.ShellExecute "cmd.exe", "/c %~s0 %params%", "", "runas", 1 >> "%temp%\getadmin.vbs"
    "%temp%\getadmin.vbs"
    del "%temp%\getadmin.vbs"
    exit /B
:gotAdmin
    pushd "%CD%"
    CD /D "%~dp0"
rem You need to replace:
rem <VPN> with the Name of the VPN connection you created
rem <USER> with the vpn user
rem <PASS> with the vpn pass
rem @echo off
@echo make sure to be disconnected!
rasdial "Your VPN" /d
@echo start to connect to vpn
rasdial "Your VPN" username password
netsh interface ip show config name="Your VPN" | findstr "IP" > ip.dat
set /p ip= < ip.dat
del ip.dat
set ip=%ip:~-13%
@echo VPN IP is %ip%
@echo Delete 192.168.1.0 route
route delete 192.168.1.0
set target=192.168.1.3
@echo Add route for %target%
route add %target% mask 255.255.255.255 %ip%
timeout /T 3 > nul

How do I specify the gmail outgoing server if I have multiple gmail accounts in my mail? I have 2 business accounts and when I send mail from one account, it is sent from the other account and the sending email is not from the correct account.

I love my apple email and do not want to use google mail on safari. However, I have 2 gmail accounts set up on apple mail, but when I send mail from one of my gmail accounts (I choose the specific gmail account in the drop down window), it actually goes out as if it is from the other gmail account. I can't have that happen because one is my job, the other is a personal business account and unfortunately, the mail from both gmail accounts want to send through the personal business account. How do I make it send from a specific gmail account? I even tried deleting the accounts and setting them up again hoping I set it up wrong in the first place, but to no avail, it is still doing the same thing except this time I set the job account up first and then the personal business account and now everything goes from the job account! The only good thing is that the incoming messages work properly and they go into the correct inbox. Somebody please fix my outbox!

In Mail Preferences/Accounts/each GMail account, set up the SMTP Outgoing Server for each account separately, going into SMTP name/edit/Advanced and specify the Username of each account. The Outgoing servers must be two different servers, authenticated by the Username and Password of each.
Otherwise, the GMail SMTP server will change the from address to that of the account where the SMTP server was setup.
Ernie

How to make a SL Mac Mini a VPN server?

I'd like to set up my Mac Mini at home as a VPN server. I have read online that it can be done in non server SL, but I see in network where to add a VPN, but that looks more like a connecting into one rather than setting one up. Is there a way to set up a VPN server on this Mini, and at that, for free?

If you have a new enough Mac mini you could use Mountain Lion and Server.app however for Snow Leopard you can in theory do it also so.
For Snow Leopard (client) you can try following various howto guides on setting up the included VPN server software via the command-line. The user version of OS X has always contained the same basic server software such as DHCP, DNS, http, and in this case VPN but does not include the Apple tools for making it easy to setup.
Here are some links
http://dreaming-artemis.com/2011/07/18/setting-up-vpn-on-the-imac-osx-snow-leopa rd-10-6-8/
http://stormrook.com/2010/05/31/setting-up-a-vpn-server-on-osx/#more-39
There is also the option of buying a relatively cheap GUI utility which does the setting up for you, see
http://macserve.org.uk/projects/ivpn/

Any connect not enabled on vpn server

DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW I CAN ENABLE THE ANYCONNECT ON THE VPN SERVER. I HAVE REGISTERED IT AND IT COMES UP AS APPLICATION IS NOT ENABLED ON VPN

I got after a little time. svc is not enabled in that group thats why it does not come up.

VPN client connect to CISCO 887 VPN Server but I can't ping Local LAN

Hi
my scenario is as follows
SERVER1 on lan (192.168.1.4)
|
|
CISCO-887 (192.168.1.254)
|
|
INTERNET
|
|
VPN Cisco client on windows 7 machine
My connection have public ip address assegned by ISP, after ppp login.
I've just configured (with Cisco Configuration Professional) the ADSL connection and VPN Server (Easy VPN).
All the PC on LAN surf internet and remote PC connect to VPN Cisco server via cisco VPN client.
But all remote PC after connection to Cisco VPN server don't ping SERVER1 in lan and therefore don't see SERVER1 and every other resource in LAN. I can't even ping the gateway 192.168.1.254
I'm using Cisco VPN client (V5.0.07) with "IPSec over UDP NAT/PAT".
What is wrong in my attached configuration? (I've alspo tried to bind Virtual-Template1 both to unnambered Dialer0 and to Loopback0 but without luck)
Perhaps ACL problem?
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 4921 bytes
! Last configuration change at 14:33:06 UTC Sun Jan 26 2014 by NetasTest
version 15.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname TestLab
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
enable secret 4 5ioUNqNjoCPaFZIVNAyYuHFA2e9v8Ivuc7a7UlyQ3Zw
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authentication login ciscocp_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
aaa authentication login ciscocp_vpn_xauth_ml_2 local
aaa authorization exec default local
aaa authorization network ciscocp_vpn_group_ml_1 local
aaa authorization network ciscocp_vpn_group_ml_2 local
aaa session-id common
memory-size iomem 10
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-3013130599
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-3013130599
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-3013130599
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-3013130599
certificate self-signed 01
3082022B 30820194 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 05050030
31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274
69666963 6174652D 33303133 31333035 3939301E 170D3134 30313236 31333333
35305A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649
4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D33 30313331
33303539 3930819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281
8100A873 940DE7B9 112D7C1E CEF53553 ED09B479 24721449 DBD6F559 1B9702B7
9087E94B 50CBB29F 6FE9C3EC A244357F 287E932F 4AB30518 08C2EAC1 1DF0C521
8D0931F7 6E7F7511 7A66FBF1 A355BB2A 26DAD318 5A5A7B0D A261EE22 1FB70FD1
C20F1073 BF055A86 D621F905 E96BD966 A4E87C95 8222F1EE C3627B9A B5963DCE
AE7F0203 010001A3 53305130 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 301F0603
551D2304 18301680 14E37481 4AAFF252 197AC35C A6C1E8E1 E9DF5B35 27301D06
03551D0E 04160414 E374814A AFF25219 7AC35CA6 C1E8E1E9 DF5B3527 300D0609
2A864886 F70D0101 05050003 81810082 FEE61317 43C08637 F840D6F8 E8FA11D5
AA5E49D4 BA720ECB 534D1D6B 1A912547 59FED1B1 2B68296C A28F1CD7 FB697048
B7BF52B8 08827BC6 20B7EA59 E029D785 2E9E11DB 8EAF8FB4 D821C7F5 1AB39B0D
B599ECC1 F38B733A 5E46FFA8 F0920CD8 DBD0984F 2A05B7A0 478A1FC5 952B0DCC
CBB28E7A E91A090D 53DAD1A0 3F66A3
quit
no ip domain lookup
ip cef
no ipv6 cef
license udi pid CISCO887VA-K9 sn ***********
username ******* secret 4 5ioUNqNjoCPaFZIVNAyYuHFA2e9v8Ivuc7a7UlyQ3Zw
username ******* secret 4 Qf/16YMe96arcCpYI46YRa.3.7HcUGTBeJB3ZyRxMtE
controller VDSL 0
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp client configuration group EXTERNALS
key NetasTest
dns 8.8.4.4
pool VPN-Pool
acl 120
crypto isakmp profile ciscocp-ike-profile-1
match identity group EXTERNALS
client authentication list ciscocp_vpn_xauth_ml_2
isakmp authorization list ciscocp_vpn_group_ml_2
client configuration address respond
virtual-template 1
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
mode tunnel
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA1 esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
mode tunnel
crypto ipsec profile CiscoCP_Profile1
set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA1
set isakmp-profile ciscocp-ike-profile-1
interface Ethernet0
no ip address
shutdown
interface ATM0
no ip address
no atm ilmi-keepalive
hold-queue 224 in
pvc 8/35
pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
interface FastEthernet1
no ip address
interface FastEthernet2
no ip address
interface FastEthernet3
no ip address
interface Virtual-Template1 type tunnel
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
tunnel protection ipsec profile CiscoCP_Profile1
interface Vlan1
ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
interface Dialer0
ip address negotiated
ip mtu 1452
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
encapsulation ppp
dialer pool 1
dialer-group 1
ppp authentication chap pap callin
ppp chap hostname ****
ppp chap password 0 *********
ppp pap sent-username ****** password 0 *******
no cdp enable
ip local pool VPN-Pool 192.168.2.210 192.168.2.215
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip http timeout-policy idle 600 life 86400 requests 10000
ip nat inside source list 100 interface Dialer0 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
access-list 100 remark
access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 100 remark
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 120 remark
access-list 120 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
line con 0
exec-timeout 5 30
password ******
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password ******
transport input all
end
Best Regards,

I've updated ios to c870-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T8.bin and tried to ping from rv320 to 871 and vice versa. Ping stil not working.
router#sh crypto session detail
Crypto session current status
Code: C - IKE Configuration mode, D - Dead Peer Detection
K - Keepalives, N - NAT-traversal, T - cTCP encapsulation
X - IKE Extended Authentication, F - IKE Fragmentation
Interface: Dialer0
Uptime: 00:40:37
Session status: UP-ACTIVE
Peer: 93.190.178.205 port 500 fvrf: (none) ivrf: (none)
Phase1_id: 192.168.1.100
Desc: (none)
IKE SA: local 93.190.177.103/500 remote 93.190.178.205/500 Active
Capabilities:(none) connid:2001 lifetime:07:19:22
IPSEC FLOW: permit ip 10.1.1.0/255.255.255.0 10.1.2.0/255.255.255.0
Active SAs: 4, origin: dynamic crypto map
Inbound: #pkts dec'ed 0 drop 30 life (KB/Sec) 4500544/1162
Outbound: #pkts enc'ed 5 drop 0 life (KB/Sec) 4500549/1162

How to mirror between the production server and the multiple local servers.

I am currently looking for the best way to correspond between our production server and the multiple local servers. Because the production server is the only server that holds the latest updating applications, and our local servers are located for each developer’s local machines where the all modifications and creations are done. So when the developer locally makes changes for assets or files, he creates a patch archive first, then accesses to the production side Administration console screen and imports them from Application Management screen.
We tried to find a way to see the imported date before (so we know which one has been imported as new.), but there is no show in the Administration console Application Management screen. There is Creation date but it’s set as we initially imported the full archive files, but not patch files. Since between applications have some types of the dependencies (like fragments or image files), what is the best way to keep mirroring between the production server and local servers? Or we should simply not use patch file for updating server?
Thanks,

Check out this utility : http://blogs.adobe.com/livecycle/2013/03/adobe-livecycle-configuration-migration-utility.h tml
Thanks,
Wasil

OSX 10.8 server Set VPN server in Local net, How to restrict the Local some IP connect to the VPN server?(noob,so need clearly)

the tittle is my question. I am noob , so I hope i can make my question clear. Now i 'd like to tell you more about my question:
My aim is to set a VPN server in Local lan, then ppl can connect to the VPN server, But I dont wanna all of the Local lan IP cant connet to it. So I neet to set a rule to restrick some local Ip to connect failure, just like banning so IP in a rule.such as: just like the "192.168.4.3~192.168.4.20 ; 192.168.7.3~192.168.7.20 " IPs can connect . the IPs which outside the rules can not do.
my step is following:
1) install server app
2)and then i set a VPN server , finally the VPN server can be connected successfully by local lan computer(PC or Mac)
3)But i found no restrict IP founction in Server app panel.
4)then i down load workgroup manager, and found nothing there about such a founction about IP restriction.
so can you tell me how to aproach my aim?
Please tell me in a clear detail,I am noob
thank you

Won't the password restrict everyone from connecting unless they know the password?
I have never worked with a VPN server, so I can't really add any suggestions. Below are links to Apple support articles, but I'm not sure they will help you:
VPN - Set up Connection
VPN - Advanced Setup
VPN - Connect
VPN - Connect Automatically

I have multiple SSID, but want users of a single SSID to be redirected to a HTTP or HTTPS URL (LAN SERVER for authentication)

Hi team,
I have multiple SSID, but want users of a single SSID to be redirected to a HTTP or HTTPS URL (LAN SERVER for authentication)
I am very curious and it is important. I want to see how to achieve this with CISCO WLC !!!

http://10.229.3.99/login.html?switch_url=https://1.1.1.1/login.html&ap_mac=e8:40:40:ad:cc:80&wlan=MO-GUEST&redirect=/login.html?switch_url=https://1.1.1.1/login.html&ap_mac=e8:40:40:ad:cc:80&wlan=MO-GUEST&redirect=/login.html?switch_url=https://1.1.1.1/login.html&ap_mac=e8:40:40:ad:cc:80&wlan=MO-GUEST&redirect=/login.html?switch_url=https://1.1.1.1/login.html&ap_mac=e8:40:40:ad:cc:80&wlan=MO-GUEST&redirect=/login.html?switch_url=https://1.1.1.1/login.html&ap_mac=e8:40:40:ad:cc:80&wlan=MO-GUEST&redirect=/login.html?switch_url=https://1.1.1.1/login.html&ap_mac=e8:40:40:ad:cc:80&wlan=MO-GUEST&redirect=/login.html?switch_url=https://1.1.1.1/login.html&ap_mac=e8:40:40:ad:cc:80&wlan=MO-GUEST&redirect=/login.html?switch_url=https://1.1.1.1/login.html&ap_mac=e8:40:40:ad:cc:80&wlan=MO-GUEST&redirect=10.229.3.99/login.html?switch_url=https://1.1.1.1/login.html&ap_mac=e8:40:40:ad:cc:80&wlan=MO-GUEST&redirect=www.geo.tv/
I wanted if someone connects to WLAN "MO-GUEST" automatically the user should be redirected to http://10.229.3.99/login.html and once authenticated by 10.229.3.99 , he/she should be allowed to access anything as normal. [ actually i just want automatic url redirection for the first time for the user of wlan "MO-GUEST"
waiting expert opinions.

My SCCM 2007 Secondary Site Servers have multiple "SMS_SiteSystemToSiteServerConnection_ SiteCode " and "SMS_SiteToSiteConnection_ SiteCode " local groups

My organization is going through a SCCM 2012 migration and I was asked about our current SCCM 2007 Secondary Sites and when I remoted into my secondary site servers I saw that two of the three servers have multiple "SMS_SiteSystemToSiteServerConnection_<SiteCode>"
and "SMS_SiteToSiteConnection_<SiteCode>" local groups.
This just seemed quite odd and I wanted to know if anyone has dealt with this before.
Thank you

Thanks for your reply Eswar.
One of the SMS_SiteToSiteConnection_<SiteCode>
groups on two of my Secondary Site servers I believe are configured correctly and they both have my Primary Site Server as a member, but the
SMS_SiteSystemToSiteServerConnection_<SiteCode> group is empty. Is the
SMS_SiteSystemToSiteServerConnection_<SiteCode> group supposed to contain my Primary Site server as well? Both the SMS_SiteSystemToSiteServerConnection_<SiteCode>
and the
SMS_SiteToSiteConnection_<SiteCode> groups on my Primary Site Server have my Secondary Site Servers as members.
Is this correct?
I'm wondering now if the strange groups with the odd site codes that don't even exist were created when the secondary sites were initially being created a while back. From the documentation, it looks like the former admin initially configured the secondary
sites using a PowerShell script created by Kaido Jarvemets. According to some of the notes I have read, the admin kept uninstalling and re-installing the sites when they were not showing up in the SCCM 2007 Admin console, but apparently they simply forgot
to configure a Sender and an Address, if that makes any sense to you.
So, perhaps these groups ending with an odd Secondary Site code may have been a typo during one of the installation attempts? If this is the case, can these groups be deleted?
One thing I forgot to mention was that the Secondary Site servers belong to a Global Security AD group and that group is used to add them to both the SMS_SiteSystemToSiteServerConnection_<SiteCode
and the SMS_SiteToSiteConnection_<SiteCode>
groups on the Primary Site server.
Is this allowed?
Thanks

RE: How to have multiple application running under one server

          I have one server
          I have many application
          Question: Is it possible for me to have a weblogic properties file under each
          of this application.


If your question is whether you can run multiple instances of WebLogic
          (or multiple applications) on one server, the answer is yes. The only
          problem is, you must have a unique port for each of the servers to run
          on. I.e., they can not all run under port 80 which has obvious
          internet/network implications.
          This also means you have multiple weblogic.properties files etc. for
          each instance.
          We do this with WL5.1 on a Linux 2.4 kernel in developement to allow
          multiple developers run their own instance on one box.
          Dano
          Mettu Kumar <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
          > No if you are running single instance of wls.
          >
          > Kumar.
          >
          > Sonny wrote:
          >
          > > I have one server
          > > I have many application
          > > Question: Is it possible for me to have a weblogic properties file under each
          > > of this application.

I have problem with login in sql Server give me support .pre login handshake

I have problem with login in sql Server give me support .pre login handshake

The following threads are on the same topic:
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/forum/threads/pre-login-handshake-error-when-connecting-to-db.687/
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12308340/sql-server-2000-connection-error-pre-login-handshake
http://dbaspot.com/sqlserver-server/458011-error-occurred-during-pre-login-handshake-microsoft-sql-server-error-10054-a.html
Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
IPAD SELECT Query Video Tutorial 3.5 Hours
New Book / Kindle: Exam 70-461 Bootcamp: Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012

Can I have multiple/separated secure sites/wikis on one server?

I would like to host several secure wikis on my one iMac running OS X Server (10.8). I've got the hostname for the primary domain and all of the virtual, primary domains good to go. It's serving out a secure wiki on servername.domainname.com, which I am also able to access through https://www.domainname.com and/or https://www.otherdomainname.com. If I replace "domainname" with any of my virtual domains it takes me to the default (hostname) primary domain's secure wiki. But what I'd really like to be able to do is have multiple such wikis, separated by the different domain names. Is this possible and how?
What I've tried, but does not achieve the desired effect is: creating a SSL enabled site. Doing that actually makes it impossible to get into the default (hostname) primary domain's secure wiki.
I do have PHP and Python enabled, if that helps at all.
Thanks in advance.

niocosys wrote:
Mark23 wrote:
You can set the forward to
www.domain.com/wiki/domain/ in the entry for domain.com
and
www.domain2.com/wiki/domain2 in the entry for domain2.com
Mark23,
Thanks for the help. I see what you're saying. As far as I can tell the address would actually have to be:
https://www.domain2.com/wiki/projects/domain2/domain_2.html
That landing page could be treated as a Table of Contents for all pages attached to it. You're right, it's not as elegant, but it is workable. That is, until someone simply clicks on "All Wikis" and is taken to the "Table of Contents" (list of all wikis on SSL site) for domain.com. Still, it's an option.
I'm going to reply to one of the other options you offered.
Actually, this wouldn't work as a redirect though because I'd lose the public website, wouldn't I? The redirect would completely bypass the http: website. Instead, I'd have to just link each of the secure wikis on the public website for each domain. Then just tell people not to go into the wikis for the other domains. Setting up groups and permissions could also take care of that, I guess.

If I have multiple apple devices and use the same iCloud login on them, shouldn't apple give us more iCloud storage for each device

If I have multiple apple devices and use the same iCloud login on them, shouldn't apple give us more iCloud storage for each device

Welcome to Apple Support Communities
No. Apple only offers 5 GB of free iCloud storage for all your devices, no matter how many you have got. If you need more iCloud storage, purchase storage.

VPN server claims I have multiple local logins

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for