VPN users cannot connect to LAN

I have to users down in australia, they can connect via vpn but cannot ping any of the LAN ip address
PLease help URGENT!

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use thI e posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Are the VPN clients in a different subnet from your LAN? If so, I would suspect a routing issue, either your VPN clients either don't know how to get to the LAN subnet and/or the LAN clients don't know how to get to the VPN client subnet.

Similar Messages

Sharing only users cannot connect to Lion Server

Dear all,
I stumbled across a funny problem, that I tried to resolve all day. I just wanted to add a sharing only user for my girlfriends new MacBook that she could use to connect to a shared Time Machine Volume.
If I add a new standard user, this user can connect to my server via finder (connect as...) and see the shared drives. If the same user tries to connect to the Time Machine Backup Volume via the settings dialog, it receives an error message (OSStatus-error 5).
If I add a sharing only user, this user cannot connect via finder or Time Machine (same error). The clients console states the following error message:
/System/Library/CoreServices/NetAuthAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/NetAuthAgent[2471] AFP error -5018 mapped to EIO
Does anybody have an Idea?

That is my point. Yes, Apple still lets you add users via users and groups in system preferences but that is not how you should be adding users. I've seen nothing but trouble when that option is used to add users and I believe that the Lion server docs say to not use that. If you are using lion server why not use it the way it was meant to be. Just create a account in OD and only give her access to the Time Machine Service and none of the others.

Users cannot connect over SMB 10.10.1 server.app 4.0 and 4.0.3

Hello,
I have an issue where users cannot connect to a server for files sharing over SMB.
Info:
All users on 10.10.1
2 Servers on 10.10.1
Server.app 4.0.3 but issue was also present using 4.0
SMB connection works when connecting to the OD Master
SMB does not work when connecting to the OD Replica ServerBut AFP works fine when connecting to the OD Replica Server.
I have destroyed and re-added the OD replica but that did not seem to help
This is what I see in the logs each time I try to connect(logs have been cleaned to remove client details:
Jan 9 14:37:12 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: label: default
Jan 9 14:37:12 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: dbname: od:/Local/Default
Jan 9 14:37:12 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: mkey_file: /var/db/krb5kdc/m-key
Jan 9 14:37:12 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: acl_file: /var/db/krb5kdc/kadmind.acl
Jan 9 14:37:12 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: uid=0
Jan 9 14:37:12 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: netr probe 0
Jan 9 14:37:12 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init request
Jan 9 14:37:12 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init return domain: SERVER2 server: SERVER2 indomain was: <NULL>
Jan 9 14:37:13 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: uid=0
Jan 9 14:37:13 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init request
Jan 9 14:37:13 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init return domain: SERVER2 server: SERVER2 indomain was: <NULL>
Jan 9 14:37:13 server.pretendco.com kdc[4802]: Got a canonicalize request for a LKDC realm from local-ipc
Jan 9 14:37:13 server.pretendco.com kdc[4802]: Asked for LKDC, but there is none
Jan 9 14:37:13 server.pretendco.com sandboxd[395] ([4802]): kdc(4802) deny file-read-data /private/etc/krb5.conf
Jan 9 14:37:22 server.pretendco.com kdc[4802]: Got a canonicalize request for a LKDC realm from local-ipc
Jan 9 14:37:22 server.pretendco.com kdc[4802]: Asked for LKDC, but there is none
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: uid=0
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init request
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init return domain: SERVER2 server: SERVER2 indomain was: <NULL>
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: uid=0
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init request
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init return domain: SERVER2 server: SERVER2 indomain was: <NULL>
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: uid=0
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: od failed with 2 proto=ntlmv2
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: user=SERVER2\\username
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: kdc failed with 36150275 proto=unknown
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: guest failed with -1561745590 proto=ntlmv2
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: uid=0
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init request
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init return domain: SERVER2 server: SERVER2 indomain was: <NULL>
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: uid=0
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init request
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: init return domain: SERVER2 server: SERVER2 indomain was: <NULL>
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: uid=0
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: od failed with 2 proto=ntlmv2
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: user=SERVER2\\codywood
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: kdc failed with 36150275 proto=unknown
Jan 9 14:37:23 server.pretendco.com digest-service[9961]: digest-request: guest failed with -1561745590 proto=ntlmv2
I suspect the problem is to do with Kerberos and in relation to this server being an OD Replica.
I would really appreciate anyone's insight into this.
Thanks
Morgs

I have the same problem although I upgraded from Lion Server to Mountain Lion Server. The error appears to go hand in hand with this error.
userInit: CFPreferences: user home directory for user kCFPreferencesCurrentUser at /Network/Servers/fullyqualifieddomainname/Users/user is unavailable. User domains will be volatile.
I've read a number of things to try. A lot of people point to DNS being a problem, but I'm confident this is correct in my environment.

User cannot connect to backend system with user J2EE_ADMIN.

I am using Rapid Installer to initiate the second part of the installtion "ERP 6.0 EhP 3 Self-Service Scenarios and Automatic Roles". When I get to the J2EE User section to enter the parameters, the user is defaulted to "Administrator" and I enter my password. I click next and get this message "User cannot connect to backend system with user J2EE_ADMIN." Any ideas?

If this is a double stack installation, you need to enter J2EE_ADMIN as user, NOT administrator.
Markus

VPN Connected Users cannot connect to the internet or send email

I just upgraded to Xserve G5 Dual 2.3 GHz 2GB SDRAM and a 3.5 TB Xserve RAID Running OSX Server 10.4.7.
Used to run G5 Tower running OSX Server 10.3.9.
Running as a Standalone Server.
Everything seems to be running smoothly other that the fact that users connecting through VPN can no longer connect to the internet while connected through VPN nor can they send email. (I assume it's the same issue).
Wondering if password type is the issue. In 10.3.9 Workgroup Manager User password types were Open Directory for my vpn users. Previous Server was Standalone Server with Open Directory running, but not setup (weird I know.) 10.4.7, Open Directory for password is not an option... only shadowed password.
Not running any Open Directory services other than Lookup Server: Running and NetInfo Server: Local Only.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
-Ed

Unless otherwise informed, a connecting client will send ALL traffic via the vpn. Ideally you only want to route traffic applicable to the VPN and for any other traffic (browsing and external email) to go via your local 'normal' router. You can configure the VPN server to inform connecting clients about applicable VPN traffic...
Example: the network you are vpn'ing into is 192.168.0.0/24
In Client Information-> Network Routing Definition, add 2 routes:
Address: 192.168.0.0
Mask: 255.255.255.0
Type: Private
Address: 0.0.0.0
Mask: 0.0.0.0
Type: Public
A connecting client will incorporate this routing information when connecting and thereafter send all traffic for the 192 network through the VPN (private) but send all other traffic (the catchall 0.0.0.0) to their local default router (public). Make sure you have them in that order (catchall at bottom).
-david

User cannot connect through VPN (Windows 2008 R2)

Hello,
TechNet has been a major help for some resent server and network problems our office has been having.
There is one ongoing issue that no matter how much I try to fix, it wants to be stubborn and refuse to work properly.
We have a user who has the necessary permissions to VPN using our router's IP address. Just recently, she found that she was unable to VPN. This was the beginning of our technical issues as after rebooting the router, our main server, and our QuickBooks
server, we lost internet and access to the main server. Those issues have been resolved. However, the user is still unable to VPN.
I have looked up every error code that has been presented when trying to connect to VPN (807 and 800 are the most frequent), and unfortunately, none of the solutions suggested worked. These errors occur when connecting through the WAN Miniport. I am trying
to find out if I am overlooking something.
What has been tried:
Router rebooted
Created new user in Active Directory
Deleting VPN Users group and readding to user
Changing tunneling protocol to L2TP instead of PPTP. Then, created a rule in Windows Advanced Firewall to allow UDP 1701.
Creating new VPN connection.
Confirmed with ISP that there are no issues with router
I am not extremely familiar with Windows 2008 R2 and every fix I see online is extremely in depth with not much walkthrough information.
I greatly appreciate any support anyone might be able to provide.
Thank you!

Hi ,
According to your description, my understanding is that the client can’t access the VPN with error code 800 and 807.
I have noticed that it failed to ping the VPN server form the client. The VPN server should be connected from the client without VPN connection established. I suggest you to turn off firewall temporarily on both sides of client and VPN server, then
try to ping the IP address of the VPN server’s interface which is connected to extranet network.
If ping failed, there might be network connectivity problem. If ping successfully, check to see if the port is open for turning traffic. Detailed troubleshooting steps you may reference the link below:
I received error 800, which says the VPN server is unreachable:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772616(WS.10).aspx#BKMK_1
Troubleshooting commom VPN related errors:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/rrasblog/archive/2009/08/12/troubleshooting-common-vpn-related-errors.aspx
If this problem still exits, does other user successfully access the VPN? Or just specified device can’t access? Would you simply describe the deployment of the VPN, such TCP/IP settings, VPN type.
Best Regards,
Eve Wang

Internal Users cannot connect to SSO

We are in the process of implementing Oracle Application Server SSO with our custom Forms application using Oracle database -- all 10.2.0.1 version. We are using JInitiator 1.3.1.22.
Our development team has been working offsite connecting via a VPN connection. They have no problem accessing the SSO page, logging in and using/testing the application.
Developers that are in the building where the Linux servers are located are using the same address in the IE7 Browsers as the developers, but cannot connect.
--They are getting the Security Certification error, which we are expecting because we installed a fake one for the development system.
-- They click 'Continue to Website'
-- Then they get the error "Internet Explorer cannot display Webpage"
The address they are using is:
https://devsys.abc.com:4444/forms/frmservlet?config=MainForm
We verified that the Domain Name Server is setup correctly.
Any help, direction and/or guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.

Take a look at this thread Test.fmx not running...How to run it
It looks to me that your problem is related to the firewall, you have to get your network team involved so that they can check the traffic flow ...
There should be at least two accesses, one for the SSO server (infrastructure server) and another one for the Forms server ... they can sniff the traffic from one of the PCs where its failing and troubleshoot further...
Just like Michael said (in the thread above there) , just because you can ping to a server does not mean that the port that you need is open or that the traffic to that port is not being blocked...
We had a similar problem, developers in one of building, a specific floor to be exact, were not able to connect to the Forms server but if they connected from another PC located in another floor in the same building they could, developers in another another building did not have problems, this is just to give you an example of how detailed the firewall rules can get ..
In the end the network team detected that one of their firewall rules meant to block something else was also blocking the access to the Forms server for that specific floor ..
Edited by: Rodolfo Ferrari on Sep 4, 2009 4:50 PM

External users cannot connect to RDS Farm (Azure).

Hi Experts,
I hope someone is able to help me with this. I have search high and low, but have not found a solution.
Here we go:
I have setup a RDS Farm in Microsoft Azur, consisting of the following servers:
KRPDC01 (Domain Controler / Active Directory / DNS Server)
KRPSH01 (Remote Session Host #1)
KRPSH02 (Remote Session Host #2)
KRPCB01 (Connection Broker)
I have installed the respective Remote session roles on the above server and added my group of users to the "Remote Desktop Users" group on each Session Host server.
At first glance it seems to work. I seem to be able to connect to the farm with the first user. But most of the times, when a second users tries to connect to the same farm, then login hangs for a time, and the connection is refused with this message:
"Remote Desktop cannot connect to the remote computer for one of the following reasons:
1) Remote Access to the server is not enabled
2) The Remote Computer is turned off
3) The Remote Computer is not available on the network
Make sure that the remote computer is turned on and connected to the network, and that remote access is enabled."
Sometimes not even the first user can connect to the farm at all with the same error message.
I have looked into the logs on the connection broker, and something interesting shows up.
It seems that whenever the connection broker wants to redirect a users connection request to a different server than the one that recieved the connection request, then the connection fails. If however the connection broker grants the connection to the same
server as the request is comming from, then the user is logged in.
Here are the log entries when the connection fails:
"RD Connection Broker received connection request for user xxx\testuser.
Hints in the RDP file (TSV URL) = tsv://MS Terminal Services Plugin.1.KRPCLOUD
Initial Application = NULL
Call came from Redirector Server = KRPSH01.xxx.net
Redirector is configured as Farm member"
Followed by:
"RD Connection Broker successfully processed the connection request for user xxx\testuser. Redirection info:
Target Name = KRPSH02
Target IP Address = 10.4.3.7
Target Netbios = KRPSH02
Target FQDN = KRPSH02.xxx.net
Disconnected Session Found = 0x0"
The a few minutes later this entry is found in the log:
"Remote Desktop Connection Broker Client failed to redirect the user xxx\testuser
Error: NULL"
These are the log entries when the connection is successfull:
"RD Connection Broker received connection request for user xxx\testuser
Hints in the RDP file (TSV URL) = tsv://MS Terminal Services Plugin.1.KRPCLOUD
Initial Application = NULL
Call came from Redirector Server = KRPSH02.xxx.net
Redirector is configured as Farm member"
Followed by:
"RD Connection Broker successfully processed the connection request for user xxx\testuser. Redirection info:
Target Name = KRPSH02
Target IP Address = 10.4.3.7
Target Netbios = KRPSH02
Target FQDN = KRPSH02.xxx.net
Disconnected Session Found = 0x0"
And then:
"Session for user KASSERAPPORTEN\krptest successfully added to RD Connection Broker's database.
Target Name = KRPSH02.kasserapporten.net
Session ID = 2
Farm Name = KRPCLOUD"
And:
"This connection request has resulted in a successful session logon (User successfully logged on to the end point). Remote Desktop Connection Broker will stop monitoring this connection request."
If I connect to one of the other servers on the network - the KRPDC01 - and from there connects to the RDS Farm (internally) then there is no problem recieving the connections. Also connections where the broker has to redirect the connection to a differing
Session Host is completed without problems.
I have noticed than when successfully connection from internally where the connection is redirected by the connection broker, then I actually recieved 2 certificate warnings. One first from the Session Host that have recieved the connection request, and the
shortly after from the second Session Host (when the connection broker is redirecting the connection) and then the connection is established.
When connection from the outside, I never get the second certificate warning.
In Azure I have setup indpoint for Remote Desktop - TCP/3389 on both Session Host servers and on the Connection broker.
As mentioned I am at a total loss, and I hope someone out there is able to help me solve this issue.
Thanks in advance :-)
Regards,
Daniél

Hi,
Seems this issue is related with Windows Azure Virtual Machine, I will move it to Windows Azure Virtual Machine Forum for a better help.
Thank you for your understanding!
Best Regards
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Domain users cannot connect to the network folders when logged in via rds remote apps

Hi,
recently I setup an RDS farm for remote apps on server 2012 r2.
all users can connect to the apps published. no problems there.
but when users connect via rds they cannot connect to the networkfolders and cannot store the resultance of there work (docx and xlsx files)
all users are normally connected to the networkfolders using a small login batch file handing down the unc path needed. when I log in as domain admin, also using a login batch, connections are setup correctly. It seems to me to be an security issue on the
rds session host.
how to alter this?
greetz, Fons
Fons system and network engineer Balie Amsterdam

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
We use WMI to communicate with the RDSH server. Various issues can cause WMI to deny access or return error codes. Here's a few things you can try:
1. Check if the "TS Web Access Computers" security group on the RDSH server has incorrect permissions in DCOM and/or WMI:
For checking DCOM security settings:
1. Start the Component Services MMC snapin
2. Navigate to Component Services -> Computers -> My Computer
3. Right-click on My Computer and select properties
4. Go to the COM Security tab
5. Under Access Permissions, click the Edit Limits button
6. Ensure that TS Web Access Computers is in the list, with all of the permissions set to “allow”.
7. Under Launch and Activation Permissions, click the Edit Limits button
8. Ensure that TS Web Access Computers is in the list, with all of the permissions set to “allow”.
For checking WMI security settings:
1. Start the WMI Control MMC snapin
2. Right-click the WMI Control node and select properties
3. Go to the Security tab
4. Navigate to Root->CIMV2->TerminalServices
5. With TerminalServices selected, click the Security button
6. Ensure that TS Web Access Computers is in the list with Execute Methods, Enable Account, and Remote Enable set to "allow"
2. Verify the RD Session Host server's firewall allows WMI calls.
3. Verify that the RD Connection Broker hasn't lost its trust relationship with the domain.
4. See if non-RDS related WMI calls can be successfully made to the RDSH server. This can help differentiate between a general WMI issue and an issue calling the RDS WMI provider.
(Quoted from following thread.)
RemoteApp Source not working from RDWeb
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/173d4546-e12f-47c1-ac66-8b4f69826892/remoteapp-source-not-working-from-rdweb?forum=winserverTS
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki

Users cannot connect to shares or sync Exchange via company wifi

Hello, I am posting this because my users can connect to the company wifi (guest and private) with no problem. They can use the internet, but nobody can reach network shares, nor can they setup or sync Exchange email via the wifi. Currently, anybody with a smartphone must be on 3g or 4g in order to get their email onsite. Laptops with wifi capability must be connected via ethernet cable in order to get to network shares and email. I've searched and searched, but cannot find anything on this. Anyone have ideas?

Hi Luis,
I am using a Cisco ASA 5510 with two Cisco AP 2600's. After digging in their configuration settings, I was able to see that the AP's IP addresses are completely different than our internal IP's, which would explain why Exchange isn't able to sync. Unless I am misunderstanding how they work, shouldn't they be giving out the same Ip scheme as the ASA? (i.e. ASA IP scheme: 10.0.10.XXX, AP IP scheme: 174.XXX.XXX.XXX)
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Jye

One user cannot connect to safari.

Good morning. We have developed a strange new problem lately that I cannot solve. On our Mac mini running 10.5 we have one user setup for our kids, and one administrator. As of yesterday the kids' account cannot connect to the internet with Safari or Firefox, however, the administrator can. I have tried all the usual routines, trashing cashes/prefs, repairing permissions, etc. I tried this morning creating a guest account to see what happens, and the guest account can also connect to the internet with no problems!
The only thing that changed lately is my Mac Pro asked me to upgrade the airport utility and firmware, so I did.
Any ideas? This is very frustrating and confusing.
Thanks
Josh

josh bosse wrote:
the kids' account cannot connect to the internet with Safari or Firefox
What type of account are they using, managed, standard, or administrator? If they are using a managed account, how are the parental controls set?

Wifi chipset incompatibility issues? 2 users cannot connect

i recently purchased a couple of Airport Extreme (n) WAP's for my office. I ended up only connecting 1 of them in the centre of the office (so-to-speak), and replaced 4 previous WAPs. Very Impressive!!!
i have 2 users who cannot connect though (conversely i have 11-15 who have no problem).
in looking at the log file using the Airport Utility, i see the following error lines:
Mar 14 12:24:05 5 Installed unicast TKIP key for supplicant 00:14:a4:34:cd:19
Mar 14 12:24:07 5 Deauthenticating with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62 (reserved 2).
Mar 14 12:24:07 5 Disassociated with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62
Mar 14 12:24:07 5 Associated with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62
Mar 14 12:24:08 5 Deauthenticating with station 00:14:a4:34:cd:19 (reserved 2).
Mar 14 12:24:08 5 Disassociated with station 00:14:a4:34:cd:19
Mar 14 12:24:10 5 Deauthenticating with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62 (reserved 2).
Mar 14 12:24:10 5 Disassociated with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62
Mar 14 12:24:10 5 Associated with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62
Mar 14 12:24:11 5 Associated with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62
Mar 14 12:24:11 5 Associated with station 00:14:a4:34:cd:19
Mar 14 12:24:11 5 Deauthenticating with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62 (reserved 2).
Mar 14 12:24:11 5 Disassociated with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62
Mar 14 12:24:11 5 Installed unicast TKIP key for supplicant 00:14:a4:34:cd:19
Mar 14 12:24:12 5 Deauthenticating with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62 (reserved 2).
Mar 14 12:24:12 5 Disassociated with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62
Mar 14 12:24:12 5 Associated with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62
Mar 14 12:24:13 5 Deauthenticating with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62 (reserved 2).
Mar 14 12:24:13 5 Disassociated with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62
Mar 14 12:24:13 5 Associated with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62
Mar 14 12:24:14 5 Deauthenticating with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62 (reserved 2).
Mar 14 12:24:14 5 Disassociated with station 00:14:a5:1f:b7:62
Mar 14 12:24:14 5 Deauthenticating with station 00:14:a4:34:cd:19 (reserved 2
it appears to be only these two people, who both have MAC Addresses starting with 00:14, which is an Atheros(?) wireless chipset? is my only option to give these users a pcmcia wifi card? One is a Dell Laptop (Vista), one is an IBM Laptop (XP) - but i suspect this is a compatibility issue with the chipset and the AP...
thoughts or ideas?
<br<br>
Other OS

One more detail. Last school year our Xserve, iMacs and MacBook Pro systems all ran Mac OS 10.8.5.

User cannot connect to exchange server

I have rounded up all of the usual suspects and am at a loss here. A user has been running in offline mode for a while. The ability to uncheck offline mode is greyed out. Pinged my Exchange server by name to see if resolves from this PC. It does. Renamed
.ost so a new one would be generated. No help. I removed the Outlook profile in Control Panel>mail and tried to create a new one. I get the cannot connect to Exchange error. I tried to log in as him on my PC and have the same results. I do not see any issues
with his account on my Exchange server. Any ideas to check on next? Never had one do this before.
Brian Gilmore Lead IT Technician Don-Nan Pump & Supply

This type of error generally occurs when user had disabled Encryption of data between Microsoft
Office Outlook and Microsoft Exchange profile , and default configuration of Exchange requires RPC encryption from Outlook client , which is not available, so this error is displayed.
To solve this issue you may try any of these solutions below:
1. Disable the encryption requirement on all CAS servers.
2. Try to manually update your Outlook profile with RPC encryption.
3.
Expand Group Policy settings to update existing Outlook profiles with RPC encryption
Hope this will work for you !!!

User cannot connect phone to account

I have a single user account that cannot connect devices. I can connect to other accounts from the device with exact settings, but not this users account. I know this is basic, but I am stumped. How can I troubleshoot this?

Hello
tip: http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2579075
and
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd439375%28v=exchg.80%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
sorry my english
The Owner Rights security principal did not have Full Control permissions on the user account that was trying to synchronize the device.

Windows SMB users cannot connect to 10.5.4 server

Hi all,
Have a server running 10.5.4 bound to AD and running an OD to provide management of the Macs. Pretty standard setup and haven't had any problems elsewhere with the same deployment. However we're having a problem with XP users connecting to SMB shares. Mac users can connect over AFP or SMB fine, XP users are getting a "Network path could not be found" error. What's more the errors in the SMB log on the server aren't too descriptive. We're getting a few broken pipe errors, but no indication of what's causing that. XP machines don't appear to be getting to the authentication stage.
Server is an Xserve with a Promise RAID, shares are on a 4TB partition, bound to AD (OD not running Kerberos). SMB setup seems to be correctly aware of the AD.
Anyone any ideas?
Thanks

Is your SMB a Standalone or Domain Member?
I have a similar problem and noticed that if I change SMB from "Domain Member" to Standalone Windows users can connect. Now every so often Leopard Server will change SMB back to a Domain Member (automatically).
I have the Server bound to AD. AFP works for the Macs no matter what. Mac Users authenticate to AD and mount the share. However if they try to use SMB, it fails for the Macs as well if SMB is a Domain Member.
I would like to stop Leopard from not reverting back or fix the "domain member" problem.
The fact that I can connect while it's a Standalone suggests, to me, that it's not a permissions problem. As well the failure carries to the Mac side means it's not a Windows issue.

VPN users cannot connect to LAN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for