VPRS in the Billing document

Hi,
We have a specific requirement for Russia where the there will be no stock at the plant level and hence the material price is set to Zero and hence the VPRS at the order level is 0 and inactive
Now the plant stock is replenishment from other company plant using the GR and the material value is updated to the sales order stock using MR21
and while doing the delivery the Price of the material is copied from the GR to GI and to billing from GI
VPRS value is appearing similar to GI but the condition status set to Inactive
We have to determine the value in the accounting, since the status is zero, the G/L accounting not determined
Please let me know if any configuration missed or any program to check this
The configuration for VRPS is similar to standard with condition category as G
regards,
santosh

I am not sure, whether you have gone through the following notes which would help you to identify the root cause of the issue.
a)   Note 379895 - Incorrect VPRS and transfer prices
b)   Note 547570 - FAQ: VPRS in pricing
c)   Note 1365939 - VPRS logic and Customizing settings in SD
d)   Note 392111 - Error when determining transfer prices
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

Posting VPRS in the billing document

Hi,
We have a requirement to post VPRS to accounting as well as CO-PA. We find that as long as VPRS is statistical, it transfers all the characteristics of the material to CO-PA. However, if we try posting VPRS to FI as well, we loose the material characteristics ( like product hierarchy etc ) when the same is posted to CO-PA.
Would appreciate inputs from the forum.
Thanks and regards,
Rohit Zalani

Hi,
Why do you want to post the VPRS to accounts at the time of billing ?
As the cost of material is already hitting the ledger at the time of goods issue of delivery....
Regards,
Harsh

The billing document are blocked for accounting release because of VPRS

Hi All,
Can anybody help me out
In PRD we changed the pricing procedure xccc66and we insert the condition type VPRS as mandatory condition. The billing documents created with reference to orders without VPRS (created before the change) are blocked for accounting because the condition VPRS is missing. We tried to run any pricing re-determination in the billing document but the system does not determine the VPRS.
In the new orders, created after import all, the system determines the VPRS condition correctly.
Can you please advice how to insert VPRS? I mean the correct procedure in order to re-determine the VPRS condition in billing documents.
Thanks,
Siddhartha

we changed the pricing procedure xccc66
If you have changed the pricing procedure itself instead of inserting the VPRS condition type in your existing pricing procedure, no it is not at all possible to insert this condition type to your billing documents. You have to cancel all those billing documents.
On the other hand, if you have inserted this condition type in your existing pricing procedure, then I think, you can, by clicking the update button, can insert this condition type which I am not sure.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Batch Split Items appearing in the billing document

Dear Friends,
Batch determination is active in our system. In the delivery there are two main items. 10 and 20 and each has Batch split and the sub items are 90001 and 90002 respectively.
Now in the billing document there appears are four items with item nos and qty as follows.
item 10 qty 1 - main item having pricing etc
item 20 qty 0 - batch split item no qty n no pricing
item 30 qty 1 - main item having pricing etc
item 40 qty 0 - batch split item no qty n no pricing
The requirement is that there should not be any sub items with zero qty. Only main items to appear in the Billing document.
One important observation I would like to share with you is that in the delivery document both main items and it's sub items have item category as TAN.
Your help is appreciated.
Regards,
Vishi
Edited by: Vishi19 on Apr 27, 2009 2:48 PM

Dear US,
Thanks for replying.
What i would like to know here is if appearance of sub items with 0 qty n 0 price does not affect in the billing document then how come VPRS cost coming only in the item conditions of the sub items. I dont see the cost in the main items.
What I want to knlow here is that does in any way these sub items affect the billing document? i mean in the accounting or data flow to CO-PA or something like that..?
Regards,
Vishi.

Error while saving the billing document

Dear All,
I am getting an Error- "No taxes on sales/purchase are allowed for account 870205 L002, AB is not allowed" when i save the billing document. when i go to the conditions tab under item data in the billing document after saving the document and try to view the detail for the discount condition type it shows that the discount condition type has a tax code AB assigned to it.
I am using the same pricing procedure in another company code where it works fine and I don't get any error. Besides here on viewing the same discount condition type there is no tax code assigned.
Can anybody explain what could be the possible reason?
I searched for the solution in the forum and came to know that if I go to FS00 and assign * to Tax Category under control data then it works fine and i don't encounter the problem after saving the billing document.
Although i have found the solution But what troubles me is that when the same pricing procedure works fine in the first company code without assigning * to the tax category then why do i need to assign * in the second company company code to be able to save the billing document.
Thanks and Regards
Deepak Joshi

First of all let me ask you to indicate the name correctly.
Secondly, the root cause to the issue what you have indicated is in FS00 and you need to compare the settings in both the company codes.
Finally, the issue is not because of your pricing procedure but because of some missing FI settings. Thats all I can say now based on the information you have provided.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Error while releasing the Billing document

Hi Everyone,
Encountering an error with the description 'Balance in Transaction currency' while trying to release the Billing document from VF02 transaction, still didnt come across the right oss note that can remove this error, can any one give me a clue on this,
Rgds,

hi,
We are facing similar problem, when releasing the billing document to accounting.
Have you been able to find the solution to this problem. If so, kindly suggest the answer
Thanks
Dinesh

Component Detail in the Billing Document

One of our markets in Europe wants to sell an assortment of products under one material number (ABC in the example below). Per a requirement from our largest customers, they want the one item to appear on the Billing Document along with all of the items in the assortment. See the table below for an idea of what the invoice needs to look like. In this example, ABC consists of 2 cases of A1, 10 cases of B2, and 7 cases of C3.
Does anyone do anything like this? If so, can you please share the details of what you do? We want to avoid Variant Config.
Sample Invoice -
Material - Quantity - Unit Price - Extended Price
ABC - 1 - $100.00 - $100.00
---A1 - 2 - $20.00 - $40.00
---B2 - 10 - $2.50 - $25.00
---C3 - 7 - $5.00 - $35.00
Total - $100.00

HI Patrick,
Here in this senario you can try SD Material BOM.
you can cerate the material BOM with main item in this case the main role play by the Item Category grp. which we take in Material Master LUMF in Sales org.2 .
When we cerate BOM for this item all the sub item will explode in the sales order & same will happen in Billing.
In this type of BOM pricing happen at sub item level not at header level.
I hope this will help u.
Regards
Deepak

Restricting for creating the Billing Document without PGI in STO Process

We want to restrict creating the Billing Document without PGI in STO Process
Delivery Type:NL
Item cataogory:NLN
Billing Type: JEX Profroma Invoice
I have check in VTFL
At Header Level, Routine - 003. for normal sales process LF-F2
At Item Level , Routine - 004
in VTFL-- NL-JEX
At Header Level, Routine - 009.
At Item Level , Routine - 010. here when i changed to 003 and 004 for NL and JEX
i am getting error after PGI when i am doing vf01 error is coming " document is not relevant for Billing"

Hi
Kindly do the belwo
1. goto the t code VOV7 item category determination and select the item category and put the billing relevance as "A"
2. once the step 1 is completed then it will show the billing relevant status AS "A"in the delivery documnt at the item level
The above configuration will be applicable in the new documents only
Regards
Damu

Not to allow to save the billing document in the back date if FI period clo

Can anybody help me please. My FI period for october is closed. But there are still some open delivery documents in billing due list for October. So now let say on 7th december if i will make the billing documents by giving the date 30.11.2007 logically as FI period is closed it will allow to save the billing document but will not pass to accounting.
So this normaly happening in my industry endusers are creating the billing documents in the back date even after the period close so all the documents come into VFX3.
So can any body help me? Can we have any check if the FI period is closed for a perticular months if we will try to make the billing documents in the closed period it will not allow to generate the billing document rather saving the documents and blocking for accounting.
Reggards.
Laxmikanta Das.
09958119889.

Dear laxmikanta
I also not come across the situation what you said and hence dont have much idea about authorization group.
However, on going through the F1 help, it says
<b>Procedure</b>
    If only a limited set of users is to be able to post in a particular
    posting period, proceed as follows:
             o   Add the posting period authorization (authorization object
        F_BKPF_BUP) to the authorizations of the selected users. Assign an
        authorization group (e.g. '0001').
              o   Enter the account type '+' for the posting period variant to which
        the restriction is to apply. Enter the period(s) whose use is to be
        restricted in the first period, those which are available to all
        users in the second period, and the authorization group (e.g.
        '0001') in the last column.
<b>Examples</b>
    A posting period can be successively restricted. If, e.g. 10 users have
    the posting period authorization with authorization group '0001', and 3
    of these 10 users also with authorization group '0002'.
    If the period is only to be accessible to the 10 selected users the
    authorization group '0001' is entered in the posting period variant.
    Access can later be restricted to the remaining 3 users by entering
    '0002'.
From the above, I feel your requirement can be met.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Error while releasing the billing document to accounting

Dear All,
I need your favor to resolve the below issue:
(System SAP SAP ECC 6.0)
User is getting the below error message while releasing the billing document to accounting in VF02:
This is an inter-company billing document (B. type : IV) created in company code 0151. Payer is "IC0186", verified the customer has been setup in 151.
Corresponding invoice has been successfully posted in company code 0186. (Partner : P0151)
User is able to post the inter-company document in 0151 using other inter- company partner (ex. IC0183). Therefore, seems that Document type can't be an issue here.
"Consolidated companies 151 and 186 are different
Message no. F5080
Diagnosis
The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all the line items. In this case at least two different companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
Procedure
If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account."
Could anyone please suggest what can be the reason, if any configuration is missing. Any help is this regard will be highly appreciated
Thanks in advance,
Praveen

Hi Murali,
Thanks for the prompt input, however as mentioned document type can't be an issue. Since user is able to post the document (same document type) using other inter-company partner in 0151.
Thanks,
Praveen

Error while cancelling the billing document in MR08

hello every one,
I am not able to cancel the billing document in MR08.it throws the following error:
Field COBL-PPRCTR. does not exist in the screen SAPLKACB 0002
Message no. 00 349
Diagnosis
The specified field does not exist on the screen.
Procedure
Check your batch input data.
Any suggestions are welcome.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
Use the T.code: VF11 to cancel billing document
Reward if it helps
Regards
Prasanna R

Error While Releasing the Billing Document Msg No. KE/AD 243

I am getting error while releasing the billing document
Error No KE/AD 243
This error comes in particular billing document only others are posted correctly.
Rgds
Dhiraj

Dear Anil
We had applied EHP3 enhancement, before EHP3 is working fine with no transfer sign assignment but after EHP 3 it gives the error and not in all billing document but in particular document only. so i think there is no changes required in KE4I.
Rgds
Dhiraj

While releasing the billing document error

Dear TEAM,
While releasing the billing document system was showing the message like NO STANDARD COST ESTIMATE COULDBE FOUND FORTHE MATERIAL.
I have suggested to the user to release the price through ck24.At that time system is showing the message like cost has not been created for the inhouse production.
The samething was tested in Qualiy server and the transaction was through.I have not done any price release for the samematerial.I have checked the table under VBAP the documents was made against to the samematerial.That time we have not faced any issues like this.
Note:Material ledger concept using by client.
Please kindly advice how to proceed further.
Regards,
Suma

have you checked in ck13n if there is a standard cost estimate for the material and what status it has, if there is one? Also, what are the dates in that cost estimate? How do they compare to the date of the billing document? What does the customizing say about the selection of cost estimates for valuation of SD documents? SPRO>Controlling>profitability analysis>master data->valuation-->Set up valuation using material cost estimates
Nikolas

Error when reversing the Billing document,

Hi,
I cancelled a billing document but it was never passed to accouting because the period is closed as the original billing document period is closed.Can i change the billing document that got cancelled for todays date so it can post to the accouting.Please let me know the options.I know i can reverse the transaction in AR but do i have options doing it from SD
Thanks.
Sri

Hi
We have a option to change the billing documnet date under header details.
1) Go to VF02
2) Enter billing document date
3) Go to header deatils and change the billing date to current billing date
4) save the document.
Pts if ur problem gets solved
RGDS
B.JAGANATH

Retriggering pricing while saving the billing document (vf01)

Hi all,
Please help me in the issue. I want to determine the pricing 'carry out new pricing B' at the time of saving invoice doucment . Can anyone tell me the userexit for doing the same.
Thanks ina advance,

Isn't there a configuration settings in copy control to the billing documents? Why do you need to use a user exit for this?
In any case, please use search here and in the SD forums (all 3 of them). I believe this has already been discussed. Search for 'invoice repricing' as well.

VPRS in the Billing document

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for