VPRS not Trigerring in Billing

Dear Gurus,
I have a scenario wherein the VPRS is getting trigerred in the order but not in the Billing document.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks & Reagrds,
Vinod

HI,
i have already done the exercise, but one thing what is standard price & moving price. am giving standard price to particular material and check in the sales order it is displayed and also showing price what i mentioned in mm01.
my question is what use for this condition?
some clients need it to show in invoice?
can u explain
regards,
MSRP

Similar Messages

Deliveries Showing as 'not relevant for billing' after Invoice Cancellation

Hi,
We have a plants abroad scenario, where the billing document (plants abroad invoice) had to be cancelled because of wrong profit centres. After correction of data, when we are trying to invoice these deliveries, the system shows these as 'not relevant for billing'. Any idea what could have caused this and/ or how to correct this?
Thanks in advance for the help,
Regards,
alok

HI Alok,
Could you please recheck the delivery document flow again, its only Billing document is cancelled or PGI reversal is also done or not.
As per my knowledge G/L correction is nothing to do with 'not relevant for billing' or "relevant for billing".
Try again there might be a case where delivery might have been reversed or billing document has not been cancelled or Document might have been blocked.
Regards,
Nagesh

Document is not relevant for billing

Dear All,
We are implementing ECC 6 in one of our client.
Our client manufacturer of x finished product, they want monitor the production process through Project system and deliver should be through project system,
We did the complete configuration from Production order till delivery in PS is working fine.
But when we try to post billing document from the delivery document, the system is showing the following error,
Document is not relevant for billing: LP is not relevant for F2.
Our doubt is in this process, whether excise invoice will be generated or not?
this LP is hard coded in SAP, We are unable to rectify the error,
our GO-LIVE date is 1st March
can any one help us to solve this issue?
Thanks in advance
regards
Elango

LP is not relevant for F2
What is LP ?? Is it Delivery type or Item Category ?? Nevertheless, copy control is missing in VTFL.
whether excise invoice will be generated or not?
If physical material movement is there from a manufacturing plant to outside, then definitely, you should generate an excise invoice
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Intercompany stock transfer - Item not relevant for billing

Hi Experts,
please can you help me in Intercompany stock transfer billing. I set up all customizing for Intercompany stock transfer, checking also with all OSS notes available.
When I try to invoice Stock Transfer Delivery (created from Stock Transfer Purchase Order) with VF01, system issues the message "F044 The item is not relevant for billing".
As per standard setting, billing relevance on Stock Transfer Delivery item category is "D".
Thank you very much
Kind Regards
Andrea

Check your copying control setting for Delv to Billing in VTFL (LF - IV)
Header:
Copying requirements - 014 - Hdr dlv.rel.IC bill.
Item:
Copying requirements - 015 - Itm dlv.rel.IC bill.
Data VBRK/VBRP - 001- Inv.split (sample)
Also, check for your I Cat that has billing indicator is active.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Item is not relevant for billing

Hi,
When I am creating the billing document,I am getting the following error log.
"Item is not relevant for billing."
But I have maintain "A" for billing relevance in item category.
Above problem is coming when I am using my new delivery type in sales document type.
What can be reason?
Regards
Prabudh

dear prabudh,
since you are using new delivery type i request you to pls check this
go to delivery to billing copy control ( VTFL)
and then select the header billing document type F2 and delivery document type LF
and select the item catagory TAN and go to details and check the copying requirement is 4 - Deliv-related item is there or not , if it is not then keep 4.
rewards if it helps
siva

Creation of Billing Document - Item is not relevant for billing

Hi
While trying to Create a Billing document after entering the Order No.the following error msg shown in the Tool Bar
No Billing Documents were generated. See log
The Error Log shows the following msg with Yellow coloured indication :
000000xxxxxx 00010 The item is not relevant for billing.
Technical Data
The Technical Data shows the Client
Group Number
Sales Document Number
Item Number of the SD Document
Schedule Line Number
Counter in control Tables
Message in Identification VF
System Message Number 044
We need to issue the credit note.
How to solve this issue?
If any one knows pls guide me.
Govind Bhaskaran

Hi
Thanks for all of your guidance.
I checked with existing Sale Order and compare with this S.Order.   I found the following:
Reason for rejection column selected by "XXXXXXXXXX" - for Curren Sales Order
Reason for rejection column emply - for existing Sales Order
I removed the contents and kept it blank.   Then we can create billing document as well
Cr. Memo without any problems.   Document posted.
Thanks for your valuable suggestions to get some idea.
Regards,
G Bhas

Error - Creation of Billing Document - Item is not relevant for billing

Hi
While trying to Create a Billing document after entering the Order No.the following error msg shown in the Tool Bar
No Billing Documents were generated. See log
The Error Log shows the following msg with Yellow coloured indication :
000000xxxxxx 00010 The item is not relevant for billing.
Technical Data
The Technical Data shows the Client
Group Number
Sales Document Number
Item Number of the SD Document
Schedule Line Number
Counter in control Tables
Message in Identification                        VF
System Message Number                       044
We need to issue the credit note.
How to solve this issue?
If any onw knows pls guide me.
Regards,
G. BHASKARAN

Hi friends,
I checked with existing Sale Order and compare with this S.Order.   I found the following:
Reason for rejection column selected by "XXXXXXXXXX" - for Curren Sales Order
Reason for rejection column emply - for existing Sales Order
I removed the contents and kept it blank.   Then we can create billing document as well
Cr. Memo without any problems.   Document posted.
Thanks for your valuable suggestions and guidance to get some idea.
Regards,
G Bhas

Copa document for free of charge orders not relevant for billing

Hi all,
when we create the shipment costs of the samples goods the systems give us this error: ME083 "Entre Profit. segment".
The mistake is related to the missing profitability segment in the sales order of samples goods there are not valid for the billing.
How can we generate a profitability segment for free of charge sales orders not relevant for the billings?
The Item Category is not relevant for the billing and we can't modify it.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards.
Matteo

Hi Sanil,
unfortunatly we can't create the billing. Due to fiscal requirements only sales orders and delivery exist.
We can't generate an invoice even with zero value.
The SD item category is not relevant for billing, so in the sales order no profitability segment is generated.
This is the standard functionalty of SAP, but we need to generate a profitability segment in the sales order because the shipment cost need it (transportation module of SAP).
All the other SD flow (sales orders with invoices) run already well.
Thanks
Matteo

The item is not relevant for billing. 3rd Party Sale

Hello, experts,
I have met a problem in 3rd party sale scenario. Here is the situation:
1. I have created a sales order using a 3re party item (item category: tas and billing type: order-related billing). And the PR is generated successfully at the schedule line level.
2. In the next step, I have created PO with reference to this PR.
3. As in my situation, the items are sent to customer by vendor directly, there is no need to maintain MIGO and MIRO.
4. I try to creat billing with reference to the sales order and here appears the error. The log shows:
"The item is not relevant for billing."
There are actually many threads in the forum and I have tried much of them.
I have checked firstly in VOV8 the sales order type->the order-related billing type for OR(standard sales order) is F2.
VOV7 the item category type->tas billing relevance: F (order-related billing)
VTFA the copy control->F2 with OR and in the item level, the item category tans is also maintained.
I can not decide where the problem is. Any idee?
Thanks,
Fan

Hi
3. As in my situation, the items are sent to customer by vendor directly, there is no need to maintain MIGO and MIRO.
This statement is absolutely wrong
MIGO is optional in third party transactions and MIRO is a Must
Third party item cat billing relevance is F
F: Order-related billing doc. - status according to invoice quantity
Relevant for order-related billing documents based on the invoice receipt quantity (third-party business transaction). The system transfers the order into the billing due list only after the vendor invoice has been received and processed in the purchasing department. After the receipt of each invoice, a customer invoice is created for the quantity that appears on the vendor invoice. The order has status "Billed" until the next vendor invoice is received.
Item category TAS (Third party item) is set up with billing relevance "F" in the standard system.
This is the SAP explanation of F billing relevance
Maintain the copy control settings in VTFA as suggested by the other friend
Without MIRO you cannot invoice the customer in third party
Regards
Raja

Hello I'm trying to update my applications and it is asking me to sign in and checking my billing account .it is not accepting my billing account that I use tried to change it several time it didn't work .what can I do to solve it?

Hello I'm trying to update my applications and it is asking me to sign in and checking my billing account .it is not accepting my billing account that I use tried to change it several time it didn't work .what can I do to solve it?

What happens when you try to confirm your details, if you are getting an error message then what does it say ? For a card to be accepted (debit cards are no longer accepted in all countries) it needs to be registered to exactly the same name and address as on your account, and have been issued by a bank in your country. If it's not being accepted then do you get the 'none' option on your account ?

Phone is NOT delivered; my bill made it. (Imagine going to a restaurant not eating and being given a bill.)

I know exactly how you feel. After getting fed up with ATT, I ordered a wireless phone and service from Verizon. I tracked the package and Fed-Ex claimed to have attempted to make delivery attempts 3 times, but that's impossible since I was home 2 of the three times and I never heard a knock or saw anyone from Fed-Ex. I contacted Verizon 3 times telling them about this and they also promised a follow up and I haven't heard from them either.
I'm now 2 weeks into the billing cycle. (Yeah, they are still charging me for service I'm not being provided!) I'm being e-mailed a notice that my statement will be available for viewing and still no phone.
Their phone response is terrible, they never call back and just forget about chatting with them on the web. Everytime it's clear they are in the wrong, their system or customer service rep *magically* "has issues connecting" and you are advised to "please, wait, while we transfer your conversation to another representative".
The wait time on that transfer, it seems, is LONGER than the original wait time, which is already an hour. I don't have an hour to stare at a chatbox waiting for some one.
It seems to me, that Verizon has become very self-important. Back when cable was the only game in town, the cable company always screwed with you when they had to send some one to fix something. It's nice to know that Verizon has decided that they would rather join the ranks of the companies known to not care about their customers concerns instead of showing that there is a better way. It's really crummy that Verizon has gone this route, but it is still nice to know how important my business and their reputation is to them.
As bad as their competitors were, they, at least, had the decency to deliver my phone and charge me after I was actually able to use it. So far, Verizon has proven to be worse. I truly hope I'm wrong and I'm just an isolated incident that will get it fixed. But, I'm wondering am I isolated? Has anyone else had problems with Verizon customer service? Or phone/equipment delivery? Or billing? I just want to know, now. what I've agreed to have 2 years of.
I'll post updates if this thread isn't deleted or my account isn't suspended for complaining.

Let me take your side here. Call verizon billing and tell them you are cancelling the phone and service since you have not received it from Fedex. Verizon requires you to sign for their shipments from Fedex. The carrier then tries three delivery attempts and then sends the package back to verizon.
If you paid by credit card call up and dispute the charge, since your 14 days of previewing has not technically started as to return it within that time frame, just cancel the whole order. Make sure Verizon does not try to bill you .
Dispute, dispute and dispute.
You could have went into a verizon store and got your phone imediately instead of being shipped.
A lost or stolen phone not signed for by you or authorized person is verizons problem and not yours. You don't owe verizon for service not provided or the phone that was not delivered. Call your bank or credit card company and have them remove the charge.

Special G/L transactions not defined for bills/exch.and down pmnts ERROR

Dear Experts,
I am trying to park document via F-63 - Invoice Parking - General to park down payments made to vendor using following details in initial screen for F-63:
Posting Key_____29
Account number _1000
SGL Ind ________A
after pressing enter key the system prompt error message that is:
Special G/L transactions not defined for bills/exch.and down pmnts
Message no. FP030
Diagnosis
You have selected a posting key with a special G/L indicator of type 'Bill of exchange', or 'Down payment'. Document parking is not defined for special G/L transactions of the type 'Bill of exchange' or 'Down payment'.
System Response
Document parking cannot be carried out.
Procedure
Select a different posting key or special G/L indicator. If the posting is a 'One-time posting' to a rent contract, select a different transaction type or post the document directly.
HOW CAN I PARK DOWN PAYMENT DOCUMENT FOR VENDOR. KINDLY PROVIDE SUITABLE SOLUTION.
REGARDS

Dear,
Your special G/L "A" is set as Down Payment/Down Payment request, this is what cause the error.
To meet your requirement just go to FBKP select special G/L "A" enter your chart of accounts and go into properties, change
Special G/L transaction types to Others from Payment/Down payment request.
Advances can be created as Special G/L transaction types Others
If parking is utmost required by you then according to me you should create two special G/L for Down Payment. New created should be used for parking and default by SAP you can use with functionality like F-47, F-48, F-54.
System is stopping you because down payment functionality is provided exhaustively in SAP so you should follow that.
Please analyze the process exhaustively and implement to smoothen your process.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

Item not relevant for Billing but still exist in Billing due list VF04

Hi Experts,
I am experiencing an issue where this is an STO scenario.
The PO->DN->PGI->GR (Receiving plant) where there is no invoice required as its with the same company.
However, I can see there is one Delivery still getting reflected in VF04 due list.
Standard Delivery type NL has been used and already checked the item categoy relevance and its
maintained as J ( Relevant for deliveries across EU countries.) I dont think so this was billed earlier as I had already checked the Deliveries created with same item category for past six months and they have not been billed.
Is there any other settings that needed to be checked apart from item cateogry and verifying how the same combination of Delivery type and item category worked earlier?
IBest Regards,
Ramesh

Dear Ramesh,
You may be right that with the same item category settings, there were no billing item generated (with the billing indicator as J in your Item Category) earlier. But how now it is happenning the other way round.
Here are the reasons:
The outbound delivery is relevant for billing if: (YOUR PRESENT CASE)
1. The Plants abroad active field is selected (found in Customizing under Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings -> Tax on Sales/Purchases -> Basic Settings -> Plants Abroad -> Activate Plants Abroad)
2. Country of departure (country where the plant is located) and destination country (country where the ship-to party is located) need to be different EU countries.
So, if you dont satisfy the above two conditions you will not get the billing item and that's what has happenned in your past 6 Months.
Regards
Edited by: SAP2020 on Nov 13, 2009 4:41 AM

Item Not relevant for Billing - due to Batch Management

Dear All ,
We have activated the Batch management and the materials are picked from the batch . When we create billing document ZF2 and ZIV using VF01 with ref to delivery , we get an message - check log - when we go to the log we see that item 900001 is not relevant for billimg n which is an warning message . This message need to be supressed .The message type - VF044.
Can you please give me your inputs on this.
Thanks and regarsd
Veera

Hello Friends,
We are also facing the similar issue as -
Delivery item 900001 is not relevant for billing , message
Client: 002
Group Number
Sales Document Number :                0080106599
Item Number of the SD Document:         900002
Schedule Line Number                 : 0044
Counter in Control Tables             : 00
Message Identification                 :VF
System Message Number            :      044
Output Type                           : I
Message Variable 01
Message Variable 02
Message Variable 03
Message Variable 04
Group Type                             : F
As per the note 77414, we made all the settings however system is showing the same message during billing execution. In this regard could you please support to get the solution.
Best Regards,
Goutham

Item not relevant for billing - Batch Management

Dear Experts,
I'm testing the Batch Management with the configuration detalied on the Building Block - J19 from SAP. So I've created a new item position called YG05 which is working for the batch spliting.
But now the problem is that when I'm billing with Tx VF04 or VF01 it gives me the following error and doesn't create the invoice.
VF 044 The item is not relevant for billing
Now, the problem fixes when I go to Tx VTFL and change the position TAN in the field Copying Requirements from 004 Delivery - Related Item to 003 Header / Dlv. - Related. I can do the billing, but when the system print the invoices it print for each position type, I mean this.
"Before the system printed 3 copies of the invoice, but now not only print the 3 copies, now it send printing the 3 copies and also 3 blank pages (i assume that those are por the YG05 position"
If anyone have and advice if the fix i did first is correct.... And also have a solution for this last problem. Please reply...
Thanks
Javier Sandoval Vera
Universal Sweet Industries
Edited by: Javier Sandoval on Feb 12, 2009 4:46 PM

Hi Javier,
for correct settings please check sap note 77414, choose your process and change your settings accordingly.
Balazs

VPRS not Trigerring in Billing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for