VSM 7 500 concurrent users reached

Hello,
This morning when logging into VSM 7 we are getting an error that 500 concurrent users has been exceeded. Which is odd since at most we *might* have a few dozen concurrent users.
Anyone know where to look to see active VSOM and SASD sessions from the CLI?
I'm curious where all these connections are coming from. We did over the holidays roll out a dozen unattended video walls, and since that is what "changed" I'm looking to those first... but it would really help to see sessions so I could narrow it down.
Thanx.
Rossi.

Found out from TAC that this is already in the bug toolkit. It is known to happen when connections end abruptly. Workaround for now is reboot the VSOM box.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App

Similar Messages

What are the AM Tuning parameters need to be set for 500 concurrent users

Hi All,
We are using JDEVADF_11.1.1.5.0.
What are the exact AM parameters(Pooling and Scalability tab) to be set when we planned for 500+ concurrent users?
Along with this do we need to set any parameters at weblogic server level, if any please give inputs.
Any input's would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Dinesh

We can?t give you exact numbers as there are many factors influencing the performance. In hte end you have to make a load test to find the right set of parameters. A good starting point is Andrejus's blog Andrejus Baranovskis's Blog: Stress Testing Oracle ADF BC Applications - Internal Connections and Andrejus Baranovskis's Blog: Stress Testing Oracle ADF BC Applications - Do Connection Pooling and TXN Disconnect Level
Timo

500 Concurrent Users: 2 J2EE Servers are enough???

Hello All,
We are planning to build the PRD system for the client on the MSCS Cluster environment. There will be 500 concurrent users and they want to have 2 J2EE Servers.
Now my Question is although there's no Single Point of Failure(SPOF) can we go ahead with the 2 J2EE Servers (I think we should not).
We are suggesting 3 J2EE Servers instead of 2 as the matter of the fact with 2 Servers is, What if one of the server goes down, all the load will be then on the single Server which may not handle all the load and may die too.
So i'm looking for the strong points to convince them for 3 Servers instead of 2.
Any ideas...
Points are guranteed
Vaib

In my experience, a single server with a 1.5GB heap size will handle about 500 - 700 users. A lot of this depends upon what exactly is going on in the portal. ESS and MSS will tend to have a greater impact on the portal than BW reports. I would say that the strongest way to convince them of this is to execute some load tests and see where the limits of your boxes are based upon your specific portal implementation.

Intercept in BI 4.x the message 'concurrent users reached'

Hi all,
is possible to intercept in BI 4.x, and then alert the user, when the maximum number of concurrent users has been reached without generating a generic error?
Thanks in advance

Thanks Konduru,
I also think that we can do with the SDK but I hope someone responds that he has already done.
Regards.

What is the ideal size of hardware for 500 concurrent users?

Hi,
I have a DB of 10GB and around 1500 forms/reports,
400 no of concurrent users.
Can anybody help me in deciding requirement of hardware for db and app.server
rgd

A lot is going to depend on the type of setup you require. How many servers you will split this up on. What your reports and forms are doing. How your datamodel is set up. How much data you have, etc.
Not sure there is a concise answer to that question.
Tony

How to get Maximum Number of Concurrent users for last few days?

Hi,
How I can get maximum number of concurrent users which were logged in to the system (ECC 5.0) I mean I want to check the hostory for last few weeks. Is there any way to get the same? I know that I can get Cumulative number of users in st03 under Expert mode but that is the number of users logged into the system during the day. Is there any place where SAP maintians the High Watermark of Number of concurrent users reached in the system?
Thanks in advance...
Regards,
Pravin

Sorry I really missed that I have posted a question here on sdn. I wanted to know this for planning the system hardware requirements. Activities like PM ( Performance Management ) happens once a year and during that activity we see heavy user loan on the system so if I have the exact stats of 1 or 2 years data I can size the system better next time. Fortunately last 2 years PM was very smooth for us. In that look for the improvement because each time we had little extra Harware. By doing the exact analysis we can save a Cost of ownership...
I was looking for R/3 users. I could see the number in st07 but I want to know the exact number at particular time.. I believe that st07 stores only for few days.
Thanks
Pravin

How many concurrent users on a FMS?

We want to stream live Town Hall meetings with the majority
of the users viewing it from our inTRAnet. 320x240, 30fps, Dual 2.8
GHz, 4 GB widows server. Anybody with similiar setup using FIMS to
service 200 or 500 concurrent users? We have two campuses and I
need to know if I will need to spec a second server if we get above
a certain number. How many concurrent users can I supprot with the
above configuration? Thanks

FMS should be able to handle your 500 clients with no problem
using the configuration you mentioned (some of my apps routinely
see many times more than that on a similar server). I use a
slightly beefier processor in my boxes though... quad core
Kentsfield Xeon / 4GB ram.
That said, also make sure you have enough throughput at your
NIC to handle the traffic. At 500 concurrent clients, a low
bandwidth stream of 300kbps puts you at about 150Mbps, so you'll
want to run the numbers before you commit to a single serves in
case you can't get enough network juice to a single box.

High txn vol and concurrent users

I have a application in hand which will be reqd to support 100000 txns per day and about 500 concurrent user
. Can BEA WebLogic deliver that. Do I need any tools like Tuxedo etc. Do you have a live project example of this volume done in Weblogic.
It would be nice if U can help me on this

100000 txs per day is about 1-2 tx per second. (unless my math is
off). That should be no problem for WLS.
I would suggest that you talk to your sales representative or
[email protected] for customer references.
-- Rob
DT wrote:
>
I have a application in hand which will be reqd to support 100000 txns per day and about 500 concurrent user
Can BEA WebLogic deliver that. Do I need any tools like Tuxedo etc. Do you have a live project example of this volume done in Weblogic.
It would be nice if U can help me on this

High volume txns and concurrent users

I have a application in hand which will be reqd to support 100000 txns per day and about 500 concurrent user
. Can BEA WebLogic deliver that. Do you have a live project example of this volume done in Weblogic.
It would be nice if U can help me on this

"DT" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
I have a application in hand which will be reqd to support 100000 txns per day and about 500 concurrent userwhen you say concurrent user, do you mean to say
1. concurrent HTTP sessions or
2. max connections(TCP/IP) to the server at any point of time..
can you provide with more info regarding the requirements...
1. How big is the application?
2. What type of application?
3. MAX HTTP Sessions at any point of time
4. MAX Connections at any point of time
5. HOW fast is the application...(jsp/ejb/db or jsp/ejb to external interfaces like messaging systems...etc...)
. Can BEA WebLogic deliver that.TTBOMK and assuming jsp/ejb/db...yes,..the point is to determine the h/w required to support the requirement.
Do you have a live project example of this volume done in Weblogic.
It would be nice if U can help me on this

Live stream on FMS issues when reaching 1600 concurrent users

Hey all,
We have an FMS 4.5.2 installation with 1x Origin and 2x Edge setup only for Live streaming. We are using FMLE latest version to stream to the Origin server and Edge servers are connecting to the Origin server. We are running four applications stream1, stream2, stream3 and stream4 all for live streaming (copied live) application. All servers have default configuration except edge/origin setup.
All servers have 4Gbit connections in bonding and network traffic is nicely distributed across all bonds and uplink is 10Gbit to the ISP.
Server is a 2 CPU / Quad Core HP DL 380 with 64Gbit of memory running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Now to the problem.
We are streaming live stream from FMLE with 700kbit/s to for example stream1 application and when we hit around 1600 concurrent users with 50% on edge1 and 50% on edge2 (800 concurrent users on each edge) in the player buffer drops and all people experience buffering issues at approx 30secs - 2minutes intervals. (network is not congested because if at that time do an SCP from the server outside network it copies 1Gbyte file within seconds.
Funny thing is that If I start a second FMLE and stream live stream to for example stream2 application at same time and open up second player on client the video runs great without any buffer issues from the same server at the same time.
edge1 server:
application: stream1 with 800 concurrent users, player has buffer issues
application: stream2 with 4 concurrent users, player has no issues
edge2 server
same as above
So my current conclusion is that it has to be something per application since other application does not have this issues when running simultaneously? We tried changing fmscore number settings and some buffer settings but nothing helped.
at the time when we get buffering issues this are the only problematic things that get in the log and its in edge.00.log on both EDGE servers but not at same times:
Edge1:
2012-04-23    12:50:21    29270    (e)2661034    Connect failed ( , 8134 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)    -
2012-04-23    12:55:30    29270    (e)2661034    Connect failed ( , 8134 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)    -
2012-04-23    12:56:42    29270    (e)2661034    Connect failed ( , 8134 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)    -
2012-04-23    12:56:42    29270    (e)2661034    Connect failed ( , 8134 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)    -
2012-04-23    13:14:40    29270    (e)2661034    Connect failed ( , 8134 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)    -
2012-04-23    13:20:30    29270    (e)2661034    Connect failed ( , 8134 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)    -
Edge2:
2012-04-23    12:56:32    9625    (e)2661034    Connect failed ( , 8134 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)    -
2012-04-23    13:02:23    9625    (e)2661034    Connect failed ( , 8134 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)    -
2012-04-23    13:08:03    9625    (e)2661034    Connect failed ( , 8134 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)    -
there is no packet loss between edge and origin servers and latency is at 0.2ms and nothing in the logs of the origin server
We even tried to deploy Wowza Medis Servers with edge / origin setup and were able to handle around 4000 (2000 on one and 2000 on second edge) concurrent users without any issues.
Anyone has any ideas or at least what are our next options to do and what settings to change on the FMS? or how to debug and what to check when buffering issue appears? any more debugging we can enable on the FMSs? too se if we hit some kind of limit somewhere?
thanks

hey, i got the similar problem, logging like this
2012-11-12
18:50:12
23434
(e)2661034
Connect failed ( , 5779212 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)
2012-11-12
18:50:54
23434
(e)2661034
Connect failed ( , 5779212 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)
2012-11-12
18:51:36
23434
(e)2661034
Connect failed ( , 1166880400 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)
2012-11-12
18:54:14
23434
(e)2661034
Connect failed ( , 1175301776 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)
2012-11-12
18:54:55
23434
(e)2661034
Connect failed ( , 1164775056 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)
2012-11-12
18:55:37
23434
(e)2661034
Connect failed ( , 16 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)
2012-11-12
19:13:08
23434
(e)2661034
Connect failed ( , 1158459024 ) : Connect failed: Connection refused (111)
it seems that the port number is invalid, but we never use such ports.

BlazeDS and scalability (i.e., concurrent users)

BlazeDS relies on the Servlet API...so, it means about a few hundred concurrent users, maximum -- which isn't very encouraging. This is because, in BlazeDS, one user equals one, or maybe two/three threads...
Has anyone else considered this and/or thought of a work around? I presume BlazeDS cannot load balance, etc, so having a proxy like Apache point to different servers isn't an option.
Anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks,
Cormac

>>BlazeDS relies on the Servlet API...so, it means about a few
>>hundred concurrent users, maximum -- which isn't very encouraging.
>>This is because, in BlazeDS, one user equals one, or maybe
>>two/three threads...
How many concurrent users a BlazeDS server can support will depend a lot on what channels/endpoints you are using. You are right that with a streaming endpoint you are probably limited to a few hundred concurrent users because each connection is persistent and is going to tie up one of your app server's request handler threads. If you use polling however you can support many more concurrent users. This is because connections are not persistent and the poll requests made to the server are short-lived. Web/application servers are very good at handling these types of requests so you should be able to handle a few thousand concurrent users using polling (although a number of factors such as your polling interval, type and size of data/messages being sent around, individual app server, server hardware, network configuration etc. will all affect this). The trade off with using polling is that it is not as real time as streaming. If a message shows up on the server it won't get delivered to you right away. Instead you'll get it the next time your poll request reaches the server. This might be ok for some people. If you need "real time" delivery of messages to large numbers of clients, you can use LiveCycle Data Services ES which has an NIO based version of the streaming endpoint. This endpoint can support many more concurrent users (probably a few thousand although caveats listed above also apply here) than the HTTP based streaming endpoint because each connection doesn't tie up a request handler thread.
>>Has anyone else considered this and/or thought of a work around? I
>>presume BlazeDS cannot load balance, etc, so having a proxy like
>>Apache point to different servers isn't an option.
You can load balance BlazeDS servers. Make sure your load balancer uses session pinning/sticky sessions because for messaging to work you need to keep communicating back to the same server. We've seen some issues with load balancing streaming connections because some load balancers buffer the data being sent back to the client over the streaming connection. I believe Apache is one of the servers that does this so you'd definitely have to do some testing to find a proxy server that worked for you if you wanted to load balance streaming connections.
>>Anyone have any suggestions?
BlazeDS actually scales quite well (at least in my opinion) when using non-persistent connections with short-lived requests, such as with polling. If you want to support large numbers of concurrent users with streaming/persistent connections, I'd look at using LiveCycle Data Services ES.
-Alex

How does ISE count concurrent users ?

Ciao,
trying to make sense of ISE concurrent users licensing, does it count a user only when it's connected ?
If I have 500 users Active Directory (using groups in policy) or 500 users in local database, are there differences in count ?
Regards,
Iarno

Hello,
Active Directory and local DB users are not counted separately. The count is on the basis of number of user and non-user endpoints connected. They can be Printers, IP Phones, labtops, iphones and android phones etc.
A High Level Design (HLD) is a document which is required to be submitted by ATP and non-ATP partners of ISE at the time or before they place an order for ISE products except lab and wireless only orders. HLD should be written by an ISE Trained Engineer.
Reason behind getting a HLD submitted by the partners is to make sure the ISE is deployed properly as it is supposed to be. There is a SAC BU approved template of HLD which needs to be filled and sent to [email protected], where a dedicated team review that particular HLD and approves if they find all the information correct in the document.
Best Regards.

Find the number of concurrent users in system at a given time

Hi All,
We have the ECC system in which we need to set up monitoring alert which should tell the following things.
1.The number of concurrent users looged currently in the system.
2. List of transaction per hour or user activites with the counts
I want to know whether we have any standard report , function module or tcode through which we can achive this.
A quick response will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Santosh

Dear Santosh,
for concurrent users there is this monitor in RZ20:
   System Configuration
       Operation Mode Status
       Instance Status
       Concurrent Users
           Concurrent Users (all Clients)    2 Usrs, Green 15.05.2014 , 17:02:18
           Concurrent Users (Client 000)     1 Usrs, Green 15.05.2014 , 17:02:18
           Concurrent Users (Client 001)     1 Usrs, Green 15.05.2014 , 17:02:18
           Concurrent Users (Client 066)     0 Usrs, Green 15.05.2014 , 17:02:18
This monitor is available under RZ20 --> SAP CCMS Monitor Templates --> System Configuration
best regards,
Alwina

Connection is closed.While Concurrent User Accesing...

<code>
[6/5/06 15:23:44:535 SGT] 4e20fe SystemErr R com.ibm.websphere.ce.cm.ObjectClosedException: DSRA9110E: Connection is closed.
</code>
Hi Every Body..have look in to my error can any one suggest to me..what si the symptoms of this error...only the concurrent users accessing time..i am exepecting this error once in while.

Is this a question about programming in Java or using WebSphere?
Perhaps a search on google will find your answer.

Load testing with concurrent users on HTTP Web

Hello,
I am trying to do load testing my PHP Web Application.
I record (with Firefox) and developed the testing script with OpenScript,
but I found that I could only test with "Iteration" feature.
Is there any way to do load testing with concurrent users ( multi users login at the same time ) which defined in databank?
Thanks for help.

Hi
You need to load the script into OLT (Oracle Load Testing) you can download it from here you need the first link Oracle Application Testing Suite and run the OATSxxx.exe to install OLT.
Regards
Alex

VSM 7 500 concurrent users reached

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for