Vss quad sup support for 4500 series

Hi all
I'm looking at at 4507r+e with dual supervisor 7
I want to run vss, however does it support quad supervisors?
I hear the second one will have to be in rommon?
In a failover how would I get the 2nd supervisor working ?
Would you need to manually boot it?

Have a look at the config guide:
Quad-Supervisor (In-chassis Standby Supervisor Engine) Support
The Catalyst 4500 series switches support dual supervisors in a redundant chassis, which can be configured for SSO or RPR mode. However, when a chassis is running in VSS mode, it supports a second supervisor engine, but only in rommon mode. In-Chassis-Standby (ICS) can not participate in control, management, or forwarding plane functioning. This makes ports on the supervisor engine in rommon mode available for forwarding although it neither participates in any switchover nor provides protection against any failure. In VSS mode, an In-Chassis-Active (ICA) supervisor engine participates in VSS control/ management operation and manages ports on the supervisor engine in rommon mode.
If the second supervisor engine is inserted in a redundant chassis, the following information applies:
•It must also be manually configured for VSS mode, i.e., it must have been converted from standalone to VSS mode previously. If you insert a supervisor engine that was not configured for VSS mode, it will disrupt the operation of the ICA supervisor engine. If it was previously configured, automatic boot must be disabled (i.e., to boot only to ROM Monitor) with the confreg command in rommon.
The supervisor engine does not takeover or boot automatically when the ICA supervisor engine fails. A manual boot up is required to make it participate in VSS; it then functions as an ICA supervisor engine.
More details on rommon commands are found at this URL:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/15.1.2/XE_340/configuration/guide/rommon.html#wp1013959
•A supervisor engine's conversion from standalone to VSS occurs per engine. If two supervisor engines exist in a chassis, one should be retained in rommon or removed, before conversion occurs. You can convert the second supervisor to VSS mode while the first supervisor is removed or in rommon, with the additional step of setting it to "boot only to ROM Monitor." When both engines are converted to VSS, they can be inserted into the chassis together and re-booted.
•Booting a chassis with two supervisor engines configured for VSS causes one of the engines to become the ICA and participate in VSS. The other engine, which becomes the ICS, will continuously reload. The secondary supervisor (the ICS) must be configured to "boot only to ROM Monitor" with automatic boot disabled.
•When the ICA fails, the ICS doesn't take over because ICS support of SSO or RPR mode is unavailable. ICS (the secondary supervisor) must be booted manually to become the ICA and manage the VSS operations. For this to happen, the former active supervisor engine must remain in rommon mode.
•ISSU support requires ICA supervisor engines on both chassis. The ICS supervisor engine does not participate in upgrade or any forwarding operations.
•Because ICS supervisor engines do not communicate with ICA supervisors, VSS and other configurations must be done at conversion time on the ICS. If not done or the configurations do not match the necessary VSS parameters (like, SwitchId, Domain, and VSL configurations), it cannot form a VSS when ICA goes down and ICS is booted manually. You can, however, enter these "bootup" commands to make it join an existing VSS domain.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/15.1.2/XE_340/configuration/guide/vss.html#wp1204229
HTH

Similar Messages

  • VSS Quad Sup Question

    Hi, 
    We have two chassis 4500's with Quad Sup's. They are currently in VSS mode with Secondary Sup in each Chassis in Rom mon. 
    Our problem is contained to the chassis themselves, not the VSS.
    When we do power failure test, the chassis reboots but the now rom mon mode supervisor powers up and becomes Primary. It does not have the configuration of the Primary Supervisor. 
    So we need to know -
    1. Does the config get synced, if not do you have to manually load config from primary sup if it fails. 
    2. Can you force a specific supervisor in a chassis to be Primary. 
    Thanks

    When we do power failure test, the chassis reboots but the now rom mon mode supervisor powers up and becomes Primary. It does not have the configuration of the Primary Supervisor.
    Without VSS, if a chassis has dual-supervisor card, the configuration of the primary card is always synchronized to the standby card.  Same goes with VSS (single- or dual supervisor card per chassis):  The configuration is synchronized to all "on-line" supervisor card. 
    The only time this doesn't happen is when the standby card is either in ROMmon or couldn't join the "redundancy" (of a dual-supervisor card per chassis or VSS) due to incorrect IOS.

  • AVC support for 3500 Series AP on 5760 platform

    Hi all,
    The title says it all. According to the 5760 Configuring Application Visibility and Control guide only the following AP types are supported
    Cisco Aironet 1600 Series Access Points
    Cisco Aironet 2600 Series Wireless Access Points
    Cisco Aironet 3600 Series Access Points
    What about the 3500 Series? Is it not (yet) supported? They are still relatively new and AVC works on AireOS based WLCs.
    Had not yet the chance to do a test myself, so I am asking here.
    Regards,
    Patrick

    Hi Patrick,
    Here is the latest AVC guide for 5760. Only addition was 3700 to the list of 1600,2600 & 3600.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/5700/software/release/ios_xe_33/iosXE_3point3_AVC_DG.html
    So no support for 3500.
    I do not think Cisco will make it work as they want to discontinue 3500 series.
    HTH
    Rasika
    **** Pls rate all useful responses ****

  • Quad Core support for P965 Neo-f

    I noticed that on the main MSI website doesn't say that P965 Neo-F.
    But prior getting the MB from a shop in Singapore, the shop seller phoned a Singapore MSI Representative and he confirmed that The Mobo will support Quad Core.
    So i end up getting the mobo. Can anyone confirm on this or the SG MSI staff has given incorrect information?

    The problem is that I there might not be a lot of people who have actually tried to make a Quad Core CPU work on that motherboard.  I believe that most people who decide to go for a Quad Core will probably just buy a mainboard that officially support that kind of CPU (and avoid the Neo-f).  Calling MSI Support to ask if it is possible even though the product description does not mention it, is usually not the "standard" procedure.
    That is why I do not believe you will find a clear answer to your question in a user forum like this, because nobody has really tried it in practice.  You might be one of the first person trying to put such a combination to work.  I am sure many people will be interested in reading about your experiences... 
    Again, I doubt that you will get a clear answer to your question, unless you find someone who has actually tried this kind of setup. Until then you have to rely on what MSI Support told you and hope that this statement is a true one.

  • Sigma raw (x3f) support for Merrill series of cameras . . .

    Just wondering when and if Adobe is going to support it in camera raw. I've been a Photoshop user since version 2 or 3 - would really like to continue with it.
    Thanks and look forward to your response!

    Actually They do they use  a Converter that changes all Camera formats to DNG Format. That Photoshop actually can read. It works with all versions of Adobe Photoshop. The people from adobe claim  (When I wrote and asked why they simply couldn't use the Camera Raw system That Apple updates every month or two to add new Cameras) That NEF and the other format that Nikon, Cannon Sony are just something they just made up and are not legitimate file formats. (despite their being used by their respective companies for years.)
    Each new version of Photoshop comes with a new version of this converter built in. And in the the past Until they came out with their way over priced subscription service you had to upgrade to a new version of PS in order to use your new camera. I have to note that Lightroom4 apparently doesn't need the converter.(on Mac they evidently uses built in Apple's Raw Converter).
    Go to Adobe's website > support and put in search box DNG Converter. 

  • IPv6 support for sx300 series?

    Hi all,
    I'm wondering if we are going to be seeing some better IPv6 support on these switches? Maybe even some static IPv6 routing?
    Thanks.

    Apparently it's on the roadmap for 2012, so with a bit of luck we'll see it some time then:
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2113913
    Oh, whoops, it's already 2013! 
    Seriously though, an update on where this feature request got to would be appreciated - is there anyone at Cisco who can give us an update?.  Perhaps there's a version 8.0 of software for these phones about to be released with new support or something?  v7 has been out there a while now.

  • NIDAQmx Base Support for E-Series PCCARD?

    Hi all,
    are there any plans for supporting the PCCARD boards (as my DAQCARD 6062E) by NIDAQmx base for Linux in (near) future? I have built a measurement software in C++ combined with a Java surface that I also would like to test on Linux. It runs fine with MSWindows.
    Thanks
    Thorsten

    pkreitler wrotevi Maps can't look inside my own phone at the Contacts for an address.  So often I am looking for an address that is in my contacts.  It would be great if Ovi Maps could look up a contact.  Should be easy, right? 
    Try opening the contact you want in Contacts and then look in Options.

  • 6509E VSS w/Quad-Sup 720 - Traffic Forwarding Issue

    Hello all,
    I ran into an interesting problem yesterday evening while performing a quad-sup upgrade to an existing dual-sup 6509E VSS architecture. Unfortunately, the expiration of my maintenance window forced me to roll back the changes before I had the opportunity to truly discover the root issue, however, I wanted to post my experience on Support Forums with the hope that someone else has run into it before.
    The customer I was working with has an existing dual-sup (720) environment operating in VSS mode. Both sup's were installed an operational in slot 5 of each chassis. The switch ID's had been assigned as 1 and 2, and the VSL was comprised of the two 10GE interfaces connected between each of the sup modules (1/5/4-2/5/4 and 1/5/5-2/5/5). The customer wanted to increase their intra-chassis redundancy by installing two additional sup 720 modules in slot 6 of each chassis, and adding these 10GE interfaces to the VSL.
    The overall upgrade went very well. I began by physically installing an additional sup 720 in slot 6 of the VSS standby chassis, and the sup module came up into RPR-Warm status (which is the desired state). I then physically installed an additional sup 720 in the VSS active chassis, and it too came up into RPR-Warm status. After reviewing the VSS redundancy state, I determined that everything looked good, and proceeded to add the additional 10GE links (1/6/4-2/6/4 and 1/6/5-2/6/5) into the VSL configuration. I then physically connected the additional VSL links (but shifted them around as to achieve diversity between the chassis (1/5/4-2/5/4, 1/5/5-2/6/5, 1/6/4-2/6/4, 1/6/5-2/5/5). I then reviewed the VSL link state and EtherChannel state, and everything looked great.
    At that point, we were pretty much done with the switch configuration, and proceeded to verify that server/network resources were not affected. I found that there seemed to be an issue sending traffic across the VSL. For example, some physical servers connected to switch ID 1 were having a difficult time communicating to physical servers connected to switch ID 2 (this customer is still working on dual-homing hosts). I looked at all of the obvious things - physical VSL interfaces, EtherChannel status, etc., and everything looked good. I then proceeded to remove physical VSL interfaces from the configuration, eliminating those that were added that evening (e.g., all interfaces except the original 1/5/4-2/5/4 were removed) - nothing. At this point, I was 10 minutes from the expiration of the maintenance window and was forced to roll back. It wasn't until the newly added sup's were physically removed from the chassis that the issue subsided. That said, I was able to conclude that the VSL wasn't the problem at all, but perhaps the installation of the sup's was??
    All of the sup 720's were running 12.2(33)SXI6 code, which I had verified to be a safe harbor version (although there are known bugs, none appear to be related to this issue).
    Has anyone run into this issue before? Any thoughts would be appreciated!

    You bring up VSS outside of the current environemnt. Create all vlans with a spanning tree priority higher than the existing.
    Create all the vlan interfaces and leave them shutdown.
    Connect the existing core to the new VSS core. Make sure that all vlans are properly crossing the trunk between old and new cores. Depending on how you're routing is set up, you might need to create a vlan to use for routing updates only.
    At this point, you can start changing spanning tree priorities to move the root of the vlans to the vss. Once these have been moved, you can start to manipulate hsrp.
    Whichever switch has the backup interface, shut those interfaces down. After this is done, shut the vlan inteface on the old core and no shut on the vss. Since vss doesn't use hsrp, it's hard to manipulate the vss since you want the vlan interface to be the previous standby ip.
    Flipping the vlan intefaces shouldn't cause any issues. I've done this method several times in large hospitals with no issues.
    Once you have the vss running, you can move the access switches 1 link at a time. Make sure you're running rapid pvst.
    The method I've used for this is to create a port channel on both the access switch and the vss. On the vss, you can assign the interfaces into the port channel immediately. On the access switch, disconnect one of the interfaces that goes to the old core. Add the disconnected inteface into the port channel then plug it back in. It should come up as the only member of the etherchannel. After you verify this link is up properly, perform the same with the second uplink on the access switch. When you plug it in, it should join the channel and you should be fine. With rapid pvst, nothing should be noticeable when the links block and unblock.

  • Windows 8.1 Will not Allow me to Install the Drivers for Officejet 4500 Series

    Hi....I just purchased my new Laptop running Windows OS 8.1.  I tried to install the Software for my
    HP Officejet J4500 Series and the install process Stops with this MESSAGE:
    "HP Officejet 4500 Series.  The Operating System on this Computer is not Supported.  The installation
    cannot continue until this is resolved
    Supported:  Windows 2000   Windows-XP 64 bit"
    I love my Officejet J4500 it has never failed me.  I purchased this printer 3 years ago from Best Buy.Is their a  New Software Drives that I can Download so that my J4500  will operate with my Win-8.1  OS ??
    What suggestions do you have for this problem...   Thank you for your Help with this....Rginarizona

    Hi,
    Try
    HP Printer wizard
    http://ftp.hp.com/pub/printers/hppiw/hppiw.exe?jumpid=ex_r4155/hho/ipg/ccdoc/piw/
    Download and Run the HP Windows 8 Printer Install Wizard
    Regards

  • UsNIC support for UCSM managed C-series server

    According to
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/usnic/c/deployment/1_5_2/b_Cisco_usNIC_Deployment_Guide_For_Standalone_C-SeriesServers.html
    usNIC is only supported for standalone c-series server, with VIC-1225 and RHEL
    Any plans to support this for UCSM managed c-series (connected with FEX to FI), and additional OS, e.g. W2012 R2 ?

    Hello Walter,
    usNIC dev team actively write blogs under HPC and you might get better response for your questions / comments to those posts :-)
    http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/ultra-low-latency-ethernet-questions-and-answers/
    http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/
    HTH
    Padma

  • Disabled scan functionality of HP Officejet 4500 Wireless with 10.9.1. HP says this printer is not supported for 10.9. Is there a solution?

    HP Officejet 4500 Wireless with 10.9.1 - Problem is not the printer, just the scanner. The scanner seems to be working but the saved files are not good images, just a bunch of scanned lines. My printer shows up under Preferences>printers and Scanners.
    I have found a clumsy work around  - accessing the scanner under Preferences>printers and Scanners allows me to produce a savable file. Problem is I loose functionality provided in the standard HP mode. Specifically I cannot change the image size. Doing that under Preferences>printers and Scanners just makes the window around the picture larger, it doesn't scale the image itself.
    My HP connection is strictly with USB, I do not use the wireless feature.
    HP tells me this printer is no longer supported for 10.9 Maverick. Is there anything else I can do to regain the scalable image size functionality with this printer/operating system combo?
    Thanks,
    Rcintio_Gray

    I hear ya. My son and his young growing familiy live in Torrey Heights near SD and I have a daughter in FL. They are smart kids.
    Thanks again

  • Switch support for NAC CCA for 6500 series switch

    per the 4.0 document "switch support for Cisco NAC" there is a note that says
    Catalyst 6000/6500 on IOS do not support mac-notification
    Does this mean you cannot deploy layer 2 OOB mode, as snmp notification to the CAM will not happen with the 6k platform?

    Probably, the configuration guide will give you better idea about your problem.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_guide_book09186a00803f5611.html

  • Cisco Prime LMS 4.1 - Support for Cisco Catalyst 3560-C Series Switches

    Hello together
    I have a customer which uses the following switch. Last year I have installed LMS 4.1 for him to manage the switches. Unfortunatly the switch model is not supported. According to the information found on the following site the switch is supported for most of the modules in LMS:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_lan_management_solution/4.1/device_support/table/lms41sdt.html
    The oid object of the device is the following: 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1465
    Supported Software: 12.2(55)EX (Customer has 12.2(55)EX3
    Version Support Type: Device Update
    So I updated all device updates I was able to find.
    Step 1: For that I went to Admin > System > Software Center > Schedule Device Downloads and created a job where I have downloaded the latest versions of all packages.
    Step 2: Installed the downloaded packages Admin > System > Software Center > Device Update and installed all the packages.
    Unfortunatly I don't see the same result like described in the Supported Device Table for LMS 4.1.
    - Cisco View -> works
    - Inventory and Config Collection -> works
    - Fault Monitor not working -> Error Code Unsupported
    - Network Topology Layer 2 Services -> Device Type ciscoProducts.1465, Symbol Question Mark
    - VLAN Management -> Doesn't work
    - User Tracking > seems also not to work
    When I open the report for supported devcies (Reports > System > Device Support) and search for C3560C... I find the following devices, but not mine which i need:
    C3560C-8PC-S     .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1466
    C3560CG8PC         .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1317
    C3560CCG8TC     .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1318
    wsC3560CPD8ptS     .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1368
    Does anybody have experience with the same switch type / model? Am I doing something wrong or is this type of switch not implemented correctly till now? Further the docuemntation supported devices would be wrong.
    Thanks for any feedback Erich

    Thanks but I just heard back from my Cisco SE and he assures me that an AP will NOT use up a license.
    I've asked him to verify his answer for me.
    Is your answer based on real world expereince (the best there is)?  That is, are you running Prime LMS 4.1 and does it indeed use up a license for each light-weight AP it discovers & manages?
    Thanks for mentioning options 1-3 but I do not wish to employ any of them.  I don't mind buying the additional licenses for APs ... I just need to know if I have to or not.
    Ian.

  • EFSU and quad-sup

    Hello,
    I need help on this. I have two Cisco Catalyst 6807 with quad sup 2T.  I'm trying to upgrade to latest IOS with the following procedure :
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/15-1SY/config_guide/sup2T/15_1_sy_swcg_2T/enhanced_fast_software_upgrade_efsu.html
    I'm upgrading from IOS 151-2.SY1 to 151-2.SY2.
    So I'm doing this :
    # issu loadversion bootdisk:s2t54-adventerprisek9-mz.SPA.151-2.SY2.bin
    At this point, the standby-ICS sup reboot fine with the new IOS.
    Then the standby sup reboots and after several minutes I always get this :
    * %ISSU_PROCESS-SW1-3-ABORT: Starting abort sequence, reason: LOADVERSION: New Standby has failed to respond
    At this point, the process fail and do a rollback.
    So my question is, does eFSU supports quad-sup ?
    Thanks

    Hi Richard,
    i dont think the whole switch will go down since it falls back to Chassis A Supervisor 2 and Chassis B supervisor 2 will be VSS standby Sup and Inchassis active for Chassis 2.
    Please read the Supervisor Switchover Events under the below link for a better understanding.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/mgx-8800-series-switches/white_paper_c11-729039.html
    Hope this helps you. 
    "Rating encourages particpation"
    Thanks
    Madhu.

  • Colors Lack of Support for Nvidia!

    I switched to Mac for the sole purpose of using "Final Touch"..shortly after it was purchased and is now Color. I bought the new studio package and loaded it all on my Workstation. Low and behold...no support for Firewire out!!...so I will have to buy an AJA earlier then planned...and I can only get 8 bit color renderning depth in settings regardless of footage quality, bit depth, resolution, or codec. My system is a Dual Quad Core 3GHZ so 8 CPUS "Octo Mac" with 9GB of RAM and 2 TB RAID storage with a Nvidia Quadro 4500! It's rather frustrating that the highest end system apple can make is crippled in Color and I have to get a lesser system (ATI card) to make it run optimally. Any answers? I purchased the Quadro because I work in Maya...but now I think I will have to save the $1400 difference and get the ATI card so I can work in a higher bit depth , and afford to purchase a High end AJA card for output. Any ideas or answers?

    Hello,
    i posted another thread about the limitation of 8bit color depth and no realtime playback and found out that it was the same problem. We had a nvidia card installed. I just installed the app on a 8core intel with ati x1900 and it works impressivley well. Perfect playback and performance. We are putting primary, 3 secondaries with super soft gradients and a pan and scan plus output correction and the systems delivers still 22fps in 2k dpx sequences. Quite amazing. But yes, nvidia gave us 8fps with an uncorrected image.
    Get the x1900 it will make you happy.

Maybe you are looking for