W3C Validation Report {Image Provided}

Hi there, i have been working all week trying to make my website error free. I have listed three errors below I cannot find the fix. the URL is http://www.helpvid.net

You have a div that is unclosed... I didn't take too much time to check which one, but if you add another closing div tag before the </body> as seen below in red, it all validates :-)
</div></div></div>
(Just look for pairs of divs to diagnose which one it actually is for your own peace of mind)
like this:
Nadia
Adobe® Community Expert : Dreamweaver
http://www.perrelink.com.au
Unique CSS Templates | Tutorials | SEO Articles
http://www.DreamweaverResources.com
http://twitter.com/nadiap

Similar Messages

W3c valid site, initially no error reported by developer toolbar. But upon right click (giving the validation menue), the the toolbar reports two errors: width and height. Despite the fact that every page is validated! On the forum for the toolbar, this i

w3c valid site, initially no error reported by developer toolbar. But upon right click (giving the validation menue), the the toolbar reports two errors: width and height. Despite the fact that every page is validated! On the forum for the toolbar, this is said to be a Browser error. So, how can this be fixed? I'm using FF 3.6.6
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== after update from 3.5?

Hi Sara,
Can you give us the URL of the page you're having problems with and of the forum thread you mentioned?
Thanks!

Technology Stack Inventory Validation Report r12.1

How do you run the Technology Stack Inventory Validation Report on R12.1?
I knew how to run it in 11i but it is not in the same place on R12.1

Thanks,
That provided some of what I was looking for but the Technology Stack Inventory Validation Report used to be
$ADPERLPRG $ORACLE_HOME/appsutil/bin/TXKScript.pl
-script=$ORACLE_HOME/appsutil/bin/txkVal11510MP.pl
-txktop=$ORACLE_HOME/appsutil
-appspass=<apps_password>
-outfile=$ORACLE_HOME/appsutil/temp/txkVal11510MP_DB.html
and the output looked like this:
Technology Validation Utility report for 11.5.10 Maintainance Pack.
===================================================================
The latest version of the Technology Validation Utility and instructions
are available in Oracle MetaLink Note 259484.1 .
Date :Mon Jun 28 16:19:52 2004
Hostname :apposf45.us.oracle.com
Node Type :Admin,Conc,DB,Web,Forms
Instance :PROD_apposf45
Platform :OSF1
DB Host :apposf45.us.oracle.com
Context File :/scratch/apps/disks/disk3/_apps_11510_ab_apps_prodappl/admin/PROD_apposf 45.xml
Report File :/scratch/disk1/_apps_11510_ab1.5/temp/txkVal11510MP.txt
Validation of Administration Server Node (apposf45):
[PASS] Database version from dbms_utility 9.2.0.3.0
[PASS] JOB_QUEUE_PROCESSES in parameter table 2
[PASS] Undo management in parameter table AUTO
[PASS] Database check confirms the fix for
materialized view
bug 2328821 has been applied.
[PASS] Amount of temporary tablespace in MB 1500
assigned to Apps Schema (determined
by querying DBA_TEMP_FILES and
DBA_USER)
[PASS] UTL_RECOMP package is found in the
database.
[PASS] The patch 2949941 for UTL_RECOMP has
been applied.
[PASS] The parallel_max_servers parameter is 8
set to
[PASS] Your Applications database contains 3.0.9.8.4
Portal version
[PASS] Your Applications database contains 3.0.9.8.4
Login Server version
Validation of Concurrent Processing Server Node (apposf45):
[PASS] 'X11 DISPLAY' parameter from the fuji01.us.oracle.com:35.0
Applications Context file
[PASS] JDK on Concurrent Processing node 1.3.1
[PASS] AF_JRE_TOP, AF_CLASSPATH and AFJVAPRG
variables are correct.
....

Schedule Cluster Validation Report

Is there a way to schedule a validation report to run once a day? We would also need to have Storage deselected in the test selection. Thanks.

Alexey provided you with references to use PowerShell. Here is where you go to learn about the task scheduler -
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc721871.aspx Or, if you want to use PowerShell for that part, too -
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj649816.aspx
Your question really is not related to Hyper-V, though. Is there some other reason you posted in the Hyper-V forum?
. : | : . : | : . tim

Validation Report warnings

In my application, I have 3 processes, and a PDF form,
the 3 processes reference the PDF form,
so each time I make a change to the PDF form, I got 3 warnings in the Validation Report tab, saying that the PDF that these processes depend on has been changed.
I can get rid of those warnings manually by doing the "Validate" on those processes.
my question is, why it doesn't do the Validate automatically? and stop displaying those warnings all the time?
is there a way to let it do the Validate automatically?
thanks

Hi,
you need to run iso files at your cluster nodes often?
Well i think you need to provide iso files to your VMs. This is possible without "Virtual CloneDrive"!
I have seen many errors with this kind of software up to bluescreens.
But ok if you really need this software just ignore the warning from cluster validation report.
The cluster will work correctly if this are the only warnings from cluster validation report.
Regards
Sebastian

Failover Cluster Validation Report with warnings

Hi,
I have 2 Node cluster on windows 2008 R2.I have run cluster validation report and found following warnings pls suggest and guide me health of cluster and how to fix and remove these warnigns. thx.
Validate All Drivers Signed
Validate that tested servers contain only signed drivers.
Validating that the servers contain only signed drivers...
The node 'cluster1.domain.com'has unsigned drivers.
Device Name Device Class Driver Version Driver Date Manufacturer Inf Name Driver Name Device ID Description Status Start Mode
Virtual CloneDrive SCSIADAPTER 5.4.4.3 1/15/2011 12:00:00 AM Elaborate Bytes AG oem1.inf Value Not Found ROOT\SCSIADAPTER\0000 Virtual CloneDrive Value Not Found Unknown
Unsigned drivers were found on one or more of the servers.

Hi,
you need to run iso files at your cluster nodes often?
Well i think you need to provide iso files to your VMs. This is possible without "Virtual CloneDrive"!
I have seen many errors with this kind of software up to bluescreens.
But ok if you really need this software just ignore the warning from cluster validation report.
The cluster will work correctly if this are the only warnings from cluster validation report.
Regards
Sebastian

W3c validator: looking for suggestions

Hi all,
can anybody help me with this?
I tried to validate the following page:
www.giuseppeguzzardi.com
I did this because the page was not correctly visible in
Netscape. I solved the incompatibility problems and now it is
visible.
The point is that now the validator shows the following
errors:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.giuseppeguzzardi.com%2F&charset=%28dete ct+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&verbose=1
Honestly I doubt that all these errors really need to be
solved, for example the tag alt that is indicated as an error is
related to immages that are only decorative.
The height of the table are necessary for the visualization
of the background immages and the same background images are
necessary also for layout reasons.
The thing that I really don' t know anything about is the
doctype declaration at the very beginning of the page code.
But the only thing I know is that if I write this
declaration, Netscape screws up all the tables.
Has anyone of you encountered similar problems? In how far is
it recomendable to really consider all errors indicated by the w3c
validator?
Thanks a lot for any helpful suggestions,
SuperGuz

On 08 Mar 2007 in macromedia.dreamweaver, SuperGuz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can anybody help me with this?
> I tried to validate the following page:
> www.giuseppeguzzardi.com
>
> I did this because the page was not correctly visible in
Netscape. I
> solved the incompatibility problems and now it is
visible.
> The point is that now the validator shows the following
errors:
>
>
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.giuseppeguzzardi.c
> om%2F&chars
et=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&verbose=1
>
> Honestly I doubt that all these errors really need to be
solved, for
> example the tag alt that is indicated as an error is
related to
> immages that are only decorative.
Those are small, but they're easily corrected, and the alt
attribute is
an accessibility issue. Alt attributes are used by screen
readers to
help describe the page.
> The height of the table are necessary for the
visualization of the
> background immages and the same background images are
necessary also
> for layout reasons.
>
> The thing that I really don' t know anything about is
the doctype
> declaration at the very beginning of the page code.
http://alistapart.com/stories/doctype/
The big deal is that if you don't have a doctype, it's
unpredictable
how browsers will display a page. With a doctype, browsers go
into
standards mode and it's fairly predictable.
> But the only thing I know is that if I write this
declaration,
> Netscape screws up all the tables.
Truth be told, Netscape is not a big consideration; I rarely
see it in
website stats. The browsers you should consider:
- Internet Explorer 6
- Firefox; I don't see much difference in page rendering
between FF1.5
and FF2
- IE7
- Safari
Also, the rule of thumb to make your life easier is to design
to
FireFox, then correct any problems you see in IE.
> Has anyone of you encountered similar problems? In how
far is it
> recomendable to really consider all errors indicated by
the w3c
> validator?
If you understand the error and its implications, then by all
means,
ignore them. I personally find that correcting validation
errors makes
code easier to understand, debug and maintain.
Joe Makowiec
http://makowiec.net/
Email:
http://makowiec.net/email.php

Hyper-V cluster validation report "Found duplicate physical address" on nic team interfaces.

I recently built a Windows 2012 Hyper-V cluster with 5 nodes. The validation report shows “duplicate physical address” error (error text pasted below).
The hardware: HP BladeSystem – servers are BL460c blades, in a c7000 enclosure, connected to HP Virtual Connect switches.
Each server has 2 physcal nics, teamed in Windows. In the NIC Teaming console, I created the following Team Interfaces and assigned each a VLAN ID:
“Team1” (the default team)
“Team1 - VLAN 204 – Management”
“Team1 - VLAN 212 - 2012HB”
“Team1 - VLAN 211 -Exchange DAG Replication”
I also created 2 HV Virtual Switches. Neither one allows management interface to share. They are assigned to “Team1” and “Team1 - VLAN 211 -Exchange DAG Replication” respectively.
Therefore, in Network Connection, I see the 2 physical Ethernet nics, and 4 “virtual” nics. Only 2 of them have IP addresses assigned: Management and HB. These are the two that the validation wizard complains
about.
The MAC address is not configurable in the NIC Teaming console, so I don’t see a way to resolve this error, except to use separate physical nics. I don’t want to do that because a) I would lose the benefits of
the bandwidth aggregation that Virtual Connect provides, and b) When creating an Interface on a Team in Windows, it looks like it ALWAYS gives it the same MAC address, so that should be a supported configuration.
Everything works just fine, and there are no other errors or IP conflicts or anything else. But I really want to fix it because I don’t know what unknown problems this may be causing.
From the Cluster Validation report:
Found duplicate physical address 10-60-4B-A9-4A-30 on node Cluster201.OurDomain.local adapter
Team1 - VLAN 212 - 2012HB and node Cluster201.OurDomain.local adapter
Team1 - VLAN 204 - Management.
Found duplicate physical address F0-92-1C-13-3C-2C on node Cluster202.OurDomain.local adapter
Team1 - VLAN 212 - 2012HB and node Cluster202.OurDomain.local adapter
Team1 - VLAN 204 - Management.
Found duplicate physical address 68-B5-99-C1-7E-9C on node Cluster210.OurDomain.local adapter
Team1 - VLAN 212 - 2012HB and node Cluster210.OurDomain.local adapter
Team1 - VLAN 204 - Management.
Found duplicate physical address 3C-4A-92-DE-1E-74 on node Cluster211.OurDomain.local adapter VC-Team - VLAN 212 - 2012HB and node Cluster211.OurDomain.local adapter
VC-Team - VLAN 204 - Management.
Found duplicate physical address 68-B5-99-C0-3D-50 on node Cluster212.OurDomain.local adapter
Team1 - VLAN 212 - 2012HB and node Cluster212.OurDomain.local adapter
Team1 - VLAN 204 - Management.
Thanks!
Dan

Hi Dan,
"It turns out that both hosts had the same default MAC address ranges for their virtual switches. Since the host vNICs were attached to the virtual switch on each host they received the first couple of MAC addresses from the switches.
For details please refer to following link:
http://www.jefflafr.com/blog/4/19/2013/conflicting-mac-addresses-when-building-a-hyper-v-cluster-with-converged-networking
Hope this helps
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Problems producing W3C-valid template-built pages

Folks:
DW CS3 on Intel Mac
CMX Design-Time Extension
I would like my site to pass the W3C markup validator,
http://validator.w3.org/.
My site design is straightforward: I've got a single
custom-built template page, "index.php" for the layout of my site.
There's no content in this file. The header of this file contains a
link to my site's single master CSS style-sheet.
All content comes from one of over 100 html "contact-chunk"
files, each of which contains only "bare" HTML, no header or
trailer material at all, no <!DOCTYPE...> nor <html>
... <head> ... </head> ... <body> ..
</body> stuff at all. One of these contact-chunk files is
included at each page-load. The details are not important.
Wait, I lied: Each of those contact-chunk files contains a
bare link to the site's master CSS style-sheet, like this:
<link href="/TheMasterStyleSheet.css" rel="stylesheet"
type="text/css">
"Bare", meaning NOT enclosed by <head> ...
</head> or anything else. DW requires just the link so it can
detect the site-wide style-sheet and let me apply styles from it to
the "content-chunk" files.
When complete pages are served to clients, that extra link
would ordinarily mean the browser would see two different external
style-sheet links from the composite page at load-time, which is is
not allowed. This is in fact flagged as an error by W3C validator.
There is no sense in giving browsers known-invalid code! It
makes total sense to me that links to external styles-sheets need
to occur just once,in the header of such composites as they are
seen by browsers. It also makes sense to me that the contact chunk
files could not contain <html> ... <head> ...
</head> ... <body> .. </body> tags because these
would be nested within the <body>... </body? structure in
the template page. Confusion!
Thanks to the DW designers, there's a way to avoid sending
the second style-sheet link: DW's Design-Time Style-Sheet mechanism
allows me declare specific style-sheet links as Design-Time ONLY;
the specified links are stripped before the files are uploaded. DW
CS3 supports only page-by-page declarations, But with the
minimal-cost "CMX Design-time" extension (
http://www.communitymx.com/abstract.cfm?CID=61265)
added, I can make these declarations on a site-wide basis. Cool!
All the above seems quite reasonable and how-it-must-be for
template-include designs. However,I have found two problems:
1. The Design-Time Style Sheet Mechanism works unpredictably
When I tell the CMX Design-time Extension to exclude my
master CSS style-sheet link from all .html files, site-wide, it
apparently does what it is required to make this happen: it creates
.mno files in _notes folders corresponding to all .html files in
the source tree. (The only files with .html extensions in my source
tree are such content-chunk files.) Without the extension, I'd end
up with identical files after manually applying Text--> CSS
Styles -->Design-Time individually to all the content-chunk
files.
I did have some successful test runs on individual content
chunk files, so I know the Design-Time Mechanism is fundamentally
sound.
Yes, I am certain I re-PUT all the .html files to the server
to allow the specified CSS link in each to be stripped. There is
only one external style-sheet, and I'm certain I specified that
one. Yes, I looked in the DW and extension documentation for
additional information.
2. This Design-Time Style Sheet mechanism is completely
ineffective for embedded styles in content-chunk files..
I think embedded styles are completely legal, and make
perfect sense when particular styles are needed only for one source
file. A few of my contact-chunk files contain these.
My questions:
Question 1: How to assure that the DW Design-Time mechanism
is activated and works consistently? Or how to debug it? What
exactly should appear in the _notes/*.mno files?
Question 2: Assuming both my development machine and the
server are running Unix, is there any downside to picking a
distinctive extension for content-chunk files? Any standard? How
about ".ihtml" e.g., "foo.ihtml"?
Question 3: Is there any alternative that preserves embedded
styles in my design? (I think it is inevitable that I'll need to
move my local styles to the master CSS style-sheet or use in-line
styles. I'm just checking in case I've missed a clever
alternative.)
Question 4: I'm doing a lot of work to make this design work
with site-wide CSS, and each time I solve one issue, another one
pops up. In my experience, that pattern either means I'm trying to
use a subtle, complex mechanism, which simply takes a while to get
right. Or that I've committed a fundamental design error, and
there's possibly a much easier way to accomplish the same result.
Which?
TIA,
Henry
TIA,
Henry

> "Bare", meaning NOT enclosed by <head> ...
</head> or anything else.
> DW
> requires just the link so it can detect the site-wide
style-sheet and let
> me
> apply styles from it to the "content-chunk" files.
Won't work. The chunks are going in the body. Links to
stylesheets in the
body are invalid HTML and ignored by the browsers.
> When complete pages are served to clients, that extra
link would
> ordinarily
> mean the browser would see two different external
style-sheet links from
> the
> composite page at load-time, which is is not allowed.
This is in fact
> flagged
> as an error by W3C validator.
This makes no sense. A page can have oodles of links to
external
stylesheets, but they must all be in the head of the page.
> 1. The Design-Time Style Sheet Mechanism works
unpredictably
Perhaps it's more accurate to say that the CMX extension
works unpredictably
with DT Stylesheets. I've never seen an instance of DT
stylesheets failing,
either in my hands or in anyone else's. Your report is the
first. I think
CMX will have to help you with this one.
> 2. This Design-Time Style Sheet mechanism is completely
ineffective for
> embedded styles in content-chunk files..
>
> I think embedded styles are completely legal, and make
perfect sense when
> particular styles are needed only for one source file. A
few of my
> contact-chunk files contain these.
Nope - embedded styles are illegal in this sense.
> Question 2: Assuming both my development machine and the
server are
> running
> Unix, is there any downside to picking a distinctive
extension for
> content-chunk files? Any standard? How about ".ihtml"
e.g.,
> "foo.ihtml"?
Nope. You could use 'monkeybutt' if you wanted. However, if
you want DW
to recognize that extension as containing HTML code you would
need to
'register' it with DW -
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=tn_16410&sliceId=1
> Question 3: Is there any alternative that preserves
embedded styles in my
> design? (I think it is inevitable that I'll need to move
my local styles
> to
> the master CSS style-sheet or use in-line styles. I'm
just checking in
> case
> I've missed a clever alternative.)
Yes, you can give each "chunk" chunk-specific container
names, and place the
desired chunk-specific CSS selectors in the parent CSS.
> Question 4: I'm doing a lot of work to make this design
work with
> site-wide
> CSS, and each time I solve one issue, another one pops
up. In my
> experience,
> that pattern either means I'm trying to use a subtle,
complex mechanism,
> which
> simply takes a while to get right. Or that I've
committed a fundamental
> design
> error, and there's possibly a much easier way to
accomplish the same
> result.
> Which?
The latter, I believe.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"hen3ry" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:[email protected]...
> Folks:
>
> DW CS3 on Intel Mac
> CMX Design-Time Extension
>
> I would like my site to pass the W3C markup validator,
>
http://validator.w3.org/.
>
> My site design is straightforward: I've got a single
custom-built
> template
> page, "index.php" for the layout of my site. There's no
content in this
> file.
> The header of this file contains a link to my site's
single master CSS
> style-sheet.
>
> All content comes from one of over 100 html
"contact-chunk" files, each of
> which contains only "bare" HTML, no header or trailer
material at all, no
> <!DOCTYPE...> nor <html> ... <head>
... </head> ... <body> .. </body>
> stuff
> at all. One of these contact-chunk files is included at
each page-load.
> The
> details are not important.
>
> Wait, I lied: Each of those contact-chunk files contains
a bare link to
> the
> site's master CSS style-sheet, like this:
>
> <link href="/TheMasterStyleSheet.css"
rel="stylesheet"
> type="text/css">
>
> "Bare", meaning NOT enclosed by <head> ...
</head> or anything else.
> DW
> requires just the link so it can detect the site-wide
style-sheet and let
> me
> apply styles from it to the "content-chunk" files.
>
> When complete pages are served to clients, that extra
link would
> ordinarily
> mean the browser would see two different external
style-sheet links from
> the
> composite page at load-time, which is is not allowed.
This is in fact
> flagged
> as an error by W3C validator.
>
> There is no sense in giving browsers known-invalid code!
It makes total
> sense to me that links to external styles-sheets need to
occur just
> once,in the
> header of such composites as they are seen by browsers.
It also makes
> sense
> to me that the contact chunk files could not contain
<html> ... <head> ...
> </head> ... <body> .. </body> tags
because these would be nested within
> the
> <body>... </body? structure in the template
page. Confusion!
>
> Thanks to the DW designers, there's a way to avoid
sending the second
> style-sheet link: DW's Design-Time Style-Sheet mechanism
allows me
> declare
> specific style-sheet links as Design-Time ONLY; the
specified links are
> stripped before the files are uploaded. DW CS3 supports
only page-by-page
> declarations, But with the minimal-cost "CMX
Design-time" extension
> (
http://www.communitymx.com/abstract.cfm?CID=61265)
added, I can make
> these
> declarations on a site-wide basis. Cool!
>
> All the above seems quite reasonable and how-it-must-be
for
> template-include
> designs. However,I have found two problems:
>
> 1. The Design-Time Style Sheet Mechanism works
unpredictably
>
> When I tell the CMX Design-time Extension to exclude my
master CSS
> style-sheet link from all .html files, site-wide, it
apparently does what
> it is
> required to make this happen: it creates .mno files in
_notes folders
> corresponding to all .html files in the source tree.
(The only files with
> .html extensions in my source tree are such
content-chunk files.) Without
> the
> extension, I'd end up with identical files after
manually applying Text-->
> CSS
> Styles -->Design-Time individually to all the
content-chunk files.
>
> I did have some successful test runs on individual
content chunk files, so
> I
> know the Design-Time Mechanism is fundamentally sound.
>
> Yes, I am certain I re-PUT all the .html files to the
server to allow the
> specified CSS link in each to be stripped. There is only
one external
> style-sheet, and I'm certain I specified that one. Yes,
I looked in the DW
> and
> extension documentation for additional information.
>
>
> 2. This Design-Time Style Sheet mechanism is completely
ineffective for
> embedded styles in content-chunk files..
>
> I think embedded styles are completely legal, and make
perfect sense when
> particular styles are needed only for one source file. A
few of my
> contact-chunk files contain these.
>
> My questions:
>
> Question 1: How to assure that the DW Design-Time
mechanism is activated
> and
> works consistently? Or how to debug it? What exactly
should appear in
> the
> _notes/*.mno files?
>
> Question 2: Assuming both my development machine and the
server are
> running
> Unix, is there any downside to picking a distinctive
extension for
> content-chunk files? Any standard? How about ".ihtml"
e.g.,
> "foo.ihtml"?
>
> Question 3: Is there any alternative that preserves
embedded styles in my
> design? (I think it is inevitable that I'll need to move
my local styles
> to
> the master CSS style-sheet or use in-line styles. I'm
just checking in
> case
> I've missed a clever alternative.)
>
> Question 4: I'm doing a lot of work to make this design
work with
> site-wide
> CSS, and each time I solve one issue, another one pops
up. In my
> experience,
> that pattern either means I'm trying to use a subtle,
complex mechanism,
> which
> simply takes a while to get right. Or that I've
committed a fundamental
> design
> error, and there's possibly a much easier way to
accomplish the same
> result.
> Which?
>
> TIA,
>
> Henry
>
> TIA,
>
> Henry
>
>

Ps5ui.dll is not a valid windows image.

Environment: XP PRO SP3, ADOBE CS3 v10.0.1
Photoshop was running well until I ran "chkdsk /f" which corrected several errors on my HD that were being reported. Everything runs well but opening a file in Photoshop returns the following error messeage popup:
the application or dll c:windows\system32\spool\drivers\w32X86\3\Ps5ui.dll is not a valid windows image. Please check this against your installation diskette.
The error message appears a total of 3 times (clicking OK each time) and then the image will open normally. Once the image is open Photoshop seems to have all its functionality.
I'm hoping for a quick fix rather than a reinstall which would requre me to find the installation disk (LoL)
Any thoughts?

Reinstall your standard Windows PostScript printer driver. The issue is utterly unrelated to Photoshop itself. Go in your control panel and run Add or Remove Programs, with the Windows Components options (Advanced mode). have your Windows install disks handy.
Mylenium

Confused with W3C validation results

Ok so i've had problems with this page (please see below), adapting it to respond to any size device. I was advised to start off by tidying up the errors on the W3C validator. I have reduced the errors right down but am having big problems with the error shown below. I have tried removing all the dl elements from each picture/element and leaving just the one containing the whole section but its still not right.
Can anyone please help me resolve it?
Line 462, Column 4: Element dl is missing a required child element.
<dd> <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_0" onclick="Recalcula…
www.milesfunerals.com/estimator.php

Ok so i've applied my unordered list. (please see below) and i applied the CSS like you suggest. Now how do i get the pictures to sit side by side in rows of two's down the page? Do i need to apply a float left and right to each <li> element or is there an easier way? This is what it currently looks like (www.milesfunerals.com/estimator.php) and this is the layout i need to acheive (www.milesfunerals.com/estimator.html).
<ul>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_0" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="-190" />
                </li>
                <li> Basic Simple Coffin (- £190)</li>
                <li><span class="dropdownmenu" id="CAT_Custom_00010" name="CAT_Custom_00010" onchange="Recalculate()"><select name="CAT_Custom_00010" class="dropdownmenu" id="CAT_Custom_00010" onchange="Recalculate()">
                  <option selected="selected" value="0">-- Select additional services --</option>
                  <option value="225" >Limousine (£225)</option>
                  <option value="200">Chapel visiting (£200)</option>
                  <option value="120">Choice of date & time (£120)</option>
                  <option value="425" >Limousine,Chapel visiting (£425)</option>
                  <option value="345" >Limousine,Choice of date & time (£345)</option>
                  <option value="320">Chapel visiting, Choice of date & time (£320)</option>
                  <option value="545" >Limousine,Chapel visiting, Choice of date & time (£545)</option>
                  </select></span>
                  <img src="images/The_Elgar.jpg" alt="Elgar" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Elgar_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=400 ')"></li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_4" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="260" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Elgar (£260)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Gladstone.jpg" alt="Gladstone" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Gladstone_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height =400')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_5" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="360" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Gladstone (£360)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Drake.jpg" alt="Drake" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Drake_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=400 ')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_3" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="435" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext"> The Drake (£435)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Byron.jpg" alt="Byron" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Byron_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=400 ')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_1" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="500" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Byron (£500)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Churchill.jpg" alt="Churchill" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Churchill_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height =400')"></li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_2" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="560" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Churchill (£560)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Nelson.jpg" alt="Nelson" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Nelson_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=40 0')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_7" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="630" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Nelson (£630)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Dickens.jpg" alt="Dickens" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Dickens_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=4 00')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_12" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="1060" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Dickens (£1060)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Wellington.jpg" alt="Wellington" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Wellington_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,heigh t=400')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_11" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="2160" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Wellington (£2160)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Victoria.jpg" alt="Victoria" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Victoria_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height= 400')">   </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_10" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="1060" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Victoria (£1060)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/colourful.jpg" alt="Colourful" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/colourfulcopy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=400' )"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_13" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="660" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext"> The Colourful (£660)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Nightingale.jpg" alt="Nightingale" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Nightingale_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,heig ht=400')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_8" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="630" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Nightingale (£630)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Pankhurst.jpg" alt="Pankhurst" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Pankhurst_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height =400')">   </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_9" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="610" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Pankhurst (£610)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Montgomery.jpg" alt="Montgomery" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Montgomery_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,heigh t=400')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_6" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="2260" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Montgomery (£2260)</span></li>
              </ul>

CRVS2010 Beta - Error: No valid Report Source is available

I am new to using crystal reports in .NET so any (un-jargoned) help is much welcomed and appreciated.
I am implementing an web application on a Windows XP machine using VS2010 and have downloaded and installed the CR4VS2010 beta 2 and the CRforNET40_x86. All installed OK with no errors.
I have embedded a crystal report viewer into my web page and have populated a dataset (myDS) successfully from my SQL server connection earlier in the code.
The report (stoppages.rpt) is an untyped report stored in a separate folder and has 2 datetime parameters to pass in. When I run the web app it runs fine until the parameter boxes appear - I enter 2 valid date values into the parameter boxes when I hit OK I get an error - No valid report source is available.
My code is shown below - I have searched other forums and it was suggested to put in the session.add part but the error occurs with or without this bit in...
Please help - newbie and desparate! Thanks
Dim myReportDocument = New CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument()
            myReportDocument.Load("C:\Reports\stoppages.rpt")
            myReportDocument.SetDataSource(myDS)
            Session.Add("Report", myReportDocument)
            crvThisReport.ReportSource = myReportDocument
Subject modified as per the sticky post at the top of this forum; [Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2010 Beta - read before posting|Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2010 Beta - read before posting;
Edited by: Ludek Uher on Oct 13, 2010 7:22 AM

Hi Ludek, I tried adding
<startup useLegacyV2RuntimeActivationPolicy="true">
<supportedRuntime version="v4.0"/>
</startup>
to the config file but it didnt resolve the problems.
However I think I have found a work-around solution to setting the parameters programmatically rather than use the crystal report viewer pop-up boxes. I am posting my code to help anyone else who might be experiencing the same problems:
Dim myReportDocument = New CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument()
myReportDocument.Load(Server.MapPath(strRptPath))
myDS.WriteXml(Server.MapPath(strXMLPath), XmlWriteMode.WriteSchema)
myReportDocument.SetDataSource(myDS)
myReportDocument.Refresh()
myReportDocument.SetParameterValue("DateFrom", #9/1/2010 6:35:00 AM#)
myReportDocument.SetParameterValue("DateTo", #9/8/2010 6:35:00 PM#)
crvThisReport.ReportSource = myReportDocument
DateFrom and DateTo are the parameter names within my crystal report.
It seems to be working fine, it stops the crystal report viewer from displaying the parameter pop-up box which stops the error occurring. However, the error still occurs when you want to interact with the report in other ways, ie page navigation, group tree navigation. It still allows me to print, export and zoom in and out, so I will have to disable some buttons and features until this error is resolved - the search continues!
Thanks for all your help and advise.
Edited by: juliep68 on Oct 14, 2010 11:33 PM

REP-1057: ' PATH_TO_REPORT/report.rdf' is not a valid Report Builder file.

Current Level : Report Builder 6.0.8.27.0
We migrated custom reports build on Report 2.5 to 6.0.8.27.0 on apps/db version
from 11.0.3 / 8.0.5 to 11.5.10.2/9.2.0.6. Platform was moved from HPUX to Redhat
Linux 4.
When we open migrated reports then original reports get converted and compiled
by Report Builder 6 without any problem. But once saved and when modified some
of the reports get corrupted and have 'REP-1057' error.
Anyone had any similar problem and found solution?
Thanks

I have a .rdf file. When I try to open the same in Report Builder for 6i, nothing happens! It just does not open!
I tried to convert the report into .REX from unix - I get the following error
REP-1057: 'FAIAPXINROH.rdf' is not a valid Report Builder file.
But, the report is running fine from Oracle apps.
I need to open this .rdf to change somethings.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Arun Tirumale

I have uninstalled and re-downloaded firefox 3 times now and each time I get and error message saying that firefox is not a valid windows image? I download it from your website but to no availe

This is the error message I get when I try and open Firefox:
''The application or DLL C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\WSOCK32.dll is not a valid Windows image. Please check this against your installation diskette.''

wsock32.dll is a Windows System file which is used to connect to the internet. if you are seeing this error message then its probably because either your Antivirus program might have moved this file to the Virus Chest or this file was Deleted mistakenly. Try Restoring this file from your Anti Virus software or check if it is still available in the Recycle Bin folder.
If above suggestions don't work, see this:
''This error is a tough one as it severely limits the programs or apps that you can run in Windows. This error pops up every time you try to open a program in windows, well not every program but most. Most spyware programs can’t be ran because this error pops up and prevents it.''
''One would think that the solution would be to repair the invalid .dll, but what ended up fixing it for me was extracting a fresh copy of explorer.exe. It looks like explorer.exe had gotten corrupt for some reason and was causing the bad image errors with certain .dll s.''
''To repair the problem open up '''msconfig''', it is actually one of the few programs in windows that would still open. To open it click on Start -> Run ->Type in '''msconfig''' and hit Enter. Once it is open click on the button that says “Expand File”. From there you will select the file that needs replaced and the location of the good file. Most of the time the good file can be found in the i386 folder of your XP install cd. My msconfig didn’t like the directory “C:\Windows\System32\ that was already filled in, so browse to the Windows\system32 directory and it should work just fine.''
''Expand the file, it will look like nothing happened, that is normal. Reboot the computer and you should not get the errors anymore.''
''To be safe, I expanded the Wsock32.dll file as well, so if for some reason your error still persists try expanding the dll file too.''
Taken from: http://www.advantage-pc.com/?p=692
Check and tell if its working.

While trying to run it show error message : "The application or DLL C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\sqlite3.dll is not a valid Windows image. Please check this against your installation diskette

Just updated firefox. While trying to run it show error message : "The application or DLL C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\sqlite3.dll is not a valid Windows image. Please check this against your installation diskette." Tried to download and install new firefox, but it alway show that the file is corrupt
== Today ==
== User Agent ==
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2)

Do a clean reinstall and download a fresh Firefox copy from http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/all.html and save the file to the desktop.
Uninstall your current Firefox version and remove the Firefox program folder before installing that copy of the Firefox installer.
It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
You can skip the step to create a new profile, that is not necessary for this issue.
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Clean_reinstall

W3C Validation Report {Image Provided}

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for