W520 with Pantone X-Rite, Images display strangely

I have a W520 with the Pantone Color X-Rite calibrator. Ive run the calibration for all the different settings but whenever I view and image it has a tourquoise back ground but only in Windows Photo Viewer. I realize the work around is just use a different image viewer but I fear this is just a symptom of a bigger problem and want to make sure I resolve it.
Has anyone seen this before?
Thanks,
Matt

hey ThePriceIsWrong,
if it happens only with the Windows Photo Viewer, i would suggest getting in contact with microsoft about this.
WW Social Media
Important Note: If you need help, post your question in the forum, and include your system type, model number and OS. Do not post your serial number.
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!
Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!
Have you checked out the Community Knowledgebase yet?!
How to send a private message? --> Check out this article.

Similar Messages

Images displayed strangely in Firefox

So, I have this bizarre issue with firefox. Some images (but not all) get displayed with very strange colours.
For example:
And how this image should look:
This only occurs in firefox. I have tried removing the ~/.mozilla directory, to no effect. Does anyone know what might be causing this? I'm totally clueless.

Klepper wrote:
I once had the same issue
switching from internal amd/ati graphics to an nvidia card resolved the issue for me
LOL!
That's just about the weirdest solution I've heard in a while - and I mean weird in a funny sense :-)

Outlook 2013 with SSRS charts in MHTML displays wrong image in email

Hi,
I've posted this question already to the SQL Server group and the SQL Team confirms this is potentially an issue with Outlook 2013 and image cache changes between 2010 and 2013. Please see the more detailed post here for more information: https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/e34516c5-53cd-4792-bc6d-4cb6e41e63cf/ssrs-2012-with-mthml-subscriptions-graphs-and-outlook-cache-issues?forum=sqlreportingservices
In short, when changing between emails that display charts from SSRS distributed via MHTML, Outlook 2013 will display the wrong graph from its image cache. This issue does NOT happen when opening the email in a browser by using the "View in Browser"
option from the Information ribbon in the email.
The issue began after upgrading from Outlook 2010 to 2013 so it would appear that the image cache algorithm has changed. We need a resolution to stop this from happening that does not include turning off cached exchange mode. I've tried changes
in the Trust center by turning off the viewers but that doesn't fix anything.
We are using Office 365 and Outlook 2013 x64 SP1.
Has anyone else experienced this or found a workaround for the issue? This is what it looks like when clicking between emails and then opening in the browser.
Thanks,
Kevin

Outlook uses Word as an email editor. That's why you may see the difference between the browser and Outlook inspectors. See the following series of articles for more information:
Word 2007 HTML and CSS Rendering Capabilities in Outlook 2007 (Part 1 of 2)
Word 2007 HTML and CSS Rendering Capabilities in Outlook 2007 (Part 2 of 2)

I updated from Windows 8.0 to Windows 8.1 and ever since Firefox has run somewhat strangely. In particular when on sites with a lot of images like Facebook,etc

Hello, I am writing as I am experiencing some issues with my favorite web browser after updating to Windows 8.1. Here are some details. I updated from Windows 8.0 to Windows 8.1 and ever since Firefox has run somewhat strangely. In particular when on sites with a lot of images like Facebook. It is like there is some kind of Flikr effect between the desktop and the images and between the images and the browser (almost like old 16 bit video games flikering). It is not too bad but it is an issue. I have tried resetting firefox and restarting the computer. I haven't tried a repair, and I haven't done an uninstall yet.

thank you for helping, the issue seems to have been caused by the hardware accelerator

Flickering problem with live viewing with IMAQ Image Display

Hi everyone,
I am trying to write a program to do live imaging with Andor camera. I am using some examples from Andor. The images are acquired in sequence and send into IMAQ Image Display and also Intensity Graph. There is minimal flickering issue in the Intensity Graph but there is very bad flickering problem in IMAQ Image Display. Perhaps I misunderstand how to optimize the vision tools. Does anyone know how to overcome this issue? I have attached the code that I am testing. Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Han Yen
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
iXonRTA_live_0.0.1.vi ‏70 KB

You can use Vision Assistant to test our vision functions. Vision Assistant is really meant to prototype - it does not have all teh functionality of Vision Development Module and is not as flexible as we don't allow you access to all the settings for every function.
I recommend starting in Vision Assistant and then porting over to LabVIEW or C (whatever you are most comfortable with)...this is built-in functionality. There is nothing wrong with using Vision Assistant to do live imaging, just that you run into limitations and you will only be able to use this code on computers that have Vision Assistant.
Hope this helps.
--Michelle
Instrument Control R&D
National Instruments
Instrument Control
Machine Vision

Strange behavior when I try to match a mpeg2 video with the menu size image

hello all,
got a strange behavior when I try to match a mpeg2 video with the menu size image,
menu size is 1920 x 1080 (photoshop file)
mpeg2 video 1920 x 1080 (1second 19 frames)
the idea is to go from the menu link to the next sub menu with a video as transition, using the same image on the video as the menu and then zooming in (in my case through a door) to end up after the zoom in the next level menu.
I try to achieve a smooth change from the first play menu picture to the video image into the next level menu picture,
everything works good but when I watch it on the preview mode on the left and right side of the video it shows a black bar at least 15 to 25 pixel wide, that means the video image appears smaller and it causes a little jump what is preety disturbing and can not be sold as a professional work.
why encore treats the video size and picture differently?
it's gratful appreciated if somebody who got experience in a transition I mentioned obove posting any solution,
thankl you all

Hi all
I'm having a very similar problem with Encore. My menu items are distorting (a minor but infuriating squashing top and bottom) when previewed.
Using Encore,PS,AE CS4
DVD format SD PAL DV widescreen
I created 3 menu frameworks and 3 video transistions to link them in AE. On the final frame of each transistion in AE I saved the frame with Composition>Save Frame to> Photoshop Layers. In PS i added the button functionality and saved.
In Encore I use Dynamic link to import AE transistions as timelines and imported each PS menu twice, once as "menu" and once as an asset.
When I link the timeline transistions to the menu and preview at the point the menu begins the whole image is squashed. When the next transistion is activated the image returns to its original size.
Thinking it was the use of PS that was causing the menus to distort I used the menu asset directly in the time line. Obviously no menu functionality but also no distortion. The AE transistion flowed straight into the "menu" just as I expected.
In the properties panel the menu Aspect Ratio 16:9
The AE transistions PAR is SD PALwidescreen 1.4587.
I did try the Blu Ray suggestion above but the same distortion was apparent.
Any suggestions short of squashing the video to match the menu would be welcomed.
Thanks

Can I make an image display instead of flash slideshow on explorer with high security?

I am a total flash beginner. I created a simple flash slideshow that I want to appear on my website. It works fine in firefox., but when viewed in explorer with high security, nothing displays unless the viewer specifically allows it. The slideshow is very prominent, and the site looks very bad when only an x shows up. Is it possible to have a static image display in place of the slideshow, and then have the slideshow start if the viewer allows it? Is there any other way to get around this?
Thank you for any assistance.
EJ

Have you tested it with IE online or only locally? Locally IE will usually prohibit displaying Flash content.

Have trial version of lightroom images display in library and 'before' in developer, but can't display full image to develop. Shows as a blue box with a white X on it.

I have downloaded and installed Lightroom for a 30 day trial. Library works fine, but when I try to edit images in Develop, I can't see the full size image just a blue box with a white X on it. If I switch on to Before & After mode, the image displays fine in the before, but still just blue box in the 'after'. Can't find any answer to this anywhere! Please help as my trial days are running out.

Lightroom CC - blue box in develop module

Problems with the images displaying incorrectly

I have done a couple of installs before this of the new Apex 4 deployed on weblogic 10.3.3 with no problems but this one has "stuck a spanner in the works". I have also looked through the forums and was unable to find a solution to the problem I am seeing. I am about to start an SR if no one is able to help on the forums.
This is my problem;
I am able to view the individual images in the images directory via the http for e.g. http://hostname.domain:7001/apex/i/date.gif and this displays correctly.
I am not able to view the http://hostname.domain:7001/apex/f?p=4550:1:2874725903020187 images as they are not displaying.
In the troubleshooting section of the install guide it mentions;
A.4 Images Displaying Incorrectly in Oracle Application Express
If images in Oracle Application Express do not display correctly, you may have more than one definition of the /i/ alias. To address this issue:
If possible, rename the first instance of /i/ to a different alias name.
Alternatively, copy the images from the ORACLE_HOME\apex\images directory to the directory defined by the first /i/ alias.
** Firstly how do I "rename the first instance of /i/" (how do I find this out?)
** How do I "Alternatively, copy the images from the ORACLE_HOME\apex\images directory to the directory defined by the first /i/ alias".
Thanks to all that reply.
If any more detail is required please just ask.

Hi,
Url where you see image should be
"http://hostname.domain:7001/i/date.gif"So /i/ should be in server root.
Sorry , I'm not familiar Apex Listener and those servers you can use with it.
It might good idea to post question to Apex Listener forum and give all details about server, database and Apex version
ORDS, SODA & JSON in the Database
Regards,
Jari

Experiencing problem with image display in LR5

I have an intermittent problem with images displaying and exporting in LR. It just began a couple of months ago and is totally random - will do it with RAW (CR2) or JPG. It displays this way in all modules - Library, Develop, Slideshow....The image displays fine in a non-Adobe image viewer (Faststone or Windows Viewer). I've reloaded LR5 and PSCC and is still persists. I know the image file is fine. It also has begun effecting older images that were showing up just fine a while ago. I just loaded about 200 images and maybe 3 or so have this viewing problem in LR & PS. Has anyone else experienced it and have a suggested fix? My graphics card has the latest drivers and shows no problems with other applications. Here is the same image - one a jpg export from Lighroom, the other a save as jpg from Faststone. HELP!

This is almost always a hardware problem, causing corruption of the file. The difference you see between Lightroom and other software is that Lightroom is accessing the full RAW image, while the other software is trying to read the embedded JPG preview.
To figure out exactly what hardware is the problem, you need to try different transmission paths and hardware ... different camera cards, different card readers or USB cables/USB ports, different hard disks, etc. Eventually you should be able to isolate the problem.

Is there a way to turn the pattern matching example in Labview to instead of loading a rectangle around what you want the template to be you can use an image display , I've be trying and can get no where with it

What I want to do is , have two images on image displays and the pass them through the same setup as the pattern matching example to get the number of matches , I have attached what I have done and also given the pattern matching example program as well.
Hope to get answers back soon,
Thanks Alan
Attachments:
screenshot.docx ‏48 KB
Pattern Matching Example.vi ‏100 KB

Hi there!
The example used can be adapted for comparing two images, however the algorithm and coding for finding the differences is more specific to your actual problem. In terms of the loading and displaying of the images, this can be done in the same way.
Once you have some sort of algorithm, then you can automate the learning and matching by simply wiring them in order. (in the example, these are put in case structures as they are waiting on response from the front panel)
I hope that this helps,
Liam A.
National Instruments
Applications Engineer

Using Data Socket with LabView 7 Image Display

I want to to connect the Image Display over the Data Socket, but its not working?

Please be more specific. How are you trying to connect to the datasocket. is it over a network. same PC.
Joe.
"NOTHING IS EVER EASY"

Show the line after draw with IMAQ selectline.vi in the image display

hi..
may i know how to show the line on the image display after i draw the line by using the IMAQ select line.vi??
i use the the IMAQ select line.vi for drawing few couples of lines...but i don know how to show it all on the image display...
because i will forget the location of the lines after i draw it by IMAQ select line.vi...
thanks for help..

Hey,
Just use IMAQ Draw.vi
Christian

Imaq Image Display Control - Zoom tool - zoom factor changes slowly

Hi at all,
we have a strange behavior with the zoom factor of the Image Display Control in an Labview executable.
Ususally by clicking into the image with the zoom tool activated, the zoom factor changes from 1,2,4,8,16, ... ("x2")
Now we have one PC, where it changes from 1,2,3,4,5,... ("+1")
Has anyone an idea on which windows setting this behavior depends on? The PC runs with Windows XP SP3, the LV-Exe was built
with LabVIEW 8.5.1 and the Vision Development Module 8.5.0. Is there any regsitry setting where I can adjust the "click intensity" or
something like that? Or can I set a property of the image control to force a specific behavior?
Actually I have never seen this behavior before, I only know the half/double mode.
In the software the operator has to search for fiducials on PCBs what means he has to click several times into the image.
Changing in the Mode "+1" instead of "x2" is not acceptable for him.
Thanks for your help!
Stefan

Hello Stefan,
thank you for posting at the National Instruments forum. The "Zoom Behaviour" was changed due to customer requests. I totally agree with you, that it is not the best solution to click 24-times to get the desired region of interest.
I created a small example for LabVIEW 2010, which uses a property node and event structure, to perform the zoom programmatically.
Best regards
MarianO
Attachments:
Calculate Zoomfactor.vi ‏21 KB
Image Example.vi ‏63 KB

PS CS5 Image Display Differs From Used ICC Profile In Win 7

Hi,
on my Windows 7 Ultimate x64 machine, I just calibrated my Dell SP2309W monitor using an i1DisplayPro and basICColor 5, creating a ICC v2 profile (I am aware of the problems under Windows with ICC v4 profiles).
It created the ICC profile and applied it to be used by Windows. I double checked under COLOR MANAGEMENT that the new ICC profile is being used. Although I can see that the new ICC is being used (desktop appearance changes), there are a few issues I am experiencing:
(1.) Windows Photo Viewer
The thumbnails in Windpows Explorer look fine (they DO use the new ICC profile), when I double click a jpeg and open the image it DOES NOT use the new ICC profile. When I click the PLAY SLIDESHOW button (starting the slideshow) in the opened image in Windows Photo Viewer, the images DO use the new ICC profile.
(2.) Internet Browsers
All current internet browser (Firefox, IE, Safari and Chrome) DO use the new ICC profile and display the image correctly.
(3.) Photoshop CS 5
When I open the same image - that Windows Photo Viewer does not correctly displays (according to the new ICC profile) - in Photoshop CS5, I get the same image display that Windows Photo Viewer gives me (when not thumbnail or not in slideshow mode) - it appears to be the sRGB display.
My color settings in PS CS5 are: North America General Purpose 2 > sRGB IEC 61966-2.1.
When I go to View > Proof Setup > Monitor RGB I get the image display using the new ICC profile.
Why does the image look different in PS than my calibrated monitor should output ?
I was under the impression (please correct me if I am wrong), that the sole purpose for calibrating my monitor was to get a uniform display across (ICC aware) applications. Even when one applies different color spaces to a document in PS, I thought the output on my calibrated screen done by the graphic card should always be according to my calibration and the settings in the ICC profile being used.
What Am I doing wrong or what am I misunderstanding ?
Any help or input is appreciated !
Thanks.
- M

Hello,
A note on monitor calibration: calibrating your monitor will not guarentee that every application will display color correctly, it's more of a step along the pipeline, and for the preview part of a color workflow it's the last step. Here's how color translation follows for an ICC workflow when previewing to a monitor:
Image Color Numbers > Document Tag or Workspace Profile > Monitor Profile
For non-color managed applications, if the original document is or isn't tagged with a color profile it will be translated directly to the monitor profile anyway. This is the equivalent in Photoshop of selecting "Monitor" in soft proofing. Selecting monitor in softproofing will bypass the tagged or workspace profile to translate colors directly through the monitor profile.
For most automatic color managed applications (like Firefox), the image will be translated through the tagged profile and then sent through the monitor profile. If the image is untagged or the profile is unrecognized, the colors get sent directly to the monitor profile.
For Photoshop, a tagged document will have its profile respected and then sent to the monitor. An untagged document will be assigned the workspace profile, which acts like a temporary document profile, and then gets sent to the monitor. This is often why users will notice Photoshop behaves differently from other applications. It's usually a case of the workspace coming into play. By default the workspace profile is set to sRGB. You can change this in Edit > Color Settings.
The purpose of the workspace is originally for printing workflows, as a way of keeping consistant color translations when dealing with both tagged and untagged documents. For web output workflows it can be useful for viewing everything through sRGB, which is typical of the average monitor output (not so with newer wide-gamut monitors, another source of confusion...) combined with the fact that originally most web browsers were not color managed. Hence viewing everything through sRGB is pretty close to what most monitors see and what untagged/unmanaged docs will look like.
Monitor calibration is useful only because it brings your monitor output to a "known state". In traditional workflows the monitor was always a middle-man, a preview device which was useful for getting an idea of what the printed output would look like before you print it. Since print colorspaces are often smaller than display spaces, it's feasible and useful to narrow down the monitor/display space and calibrate it to a known state, so that even if it doesn't totally match the print, you'll get used to its differences/limitations and they'll be consistent so long as the calibration is maintained.
For web output, your final output is often another user's computer monitor, which can have any form of behavior (most standard monitors are pretty close to sRGB, or use sRGB as an operating system workspace (default monitor profile). Wide gamuts behave differently, but I'm not sure if there's a particular ICC space that they closely match, or if different wide-gamuts are even that close to each other in their display color spaces.
Hope this helps!

W520 with Pantone X-Rite, Images display strangely

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for