WAAS 4.1
I was wondering if anyone knew if the new WAAS software version 4.1 gets rid of the idea of connectivity groups and having to identify a WAE as a core, or edge rather than it operating as either without extra confgiuration? I have tried looking in the FAQ but didn't see it addressed. Thanks.
Cameron,
The public documentation for the 4.1 release is currently under development. A summary of the new features is located here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6870/index.html
Zach
Similar Messages
-
Issue Uninstalling WAAS Mobile Client on Windows 7
I upgraded my laptop in hopes that issues pertaining to Vista would be resolved. Those issues remained, but was going to try to uninstall and reinstall under Windows 7 and check this for grins. I have tried to uninstall and get this error -
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
Cisco WAAS Mobile was interrupted before the installation/uninstallation of your software was fully completed. You can rerun this wizard at another time to complete the setup of this software. (1722)
I've tried rebooting, but get the same error.
Any suggestions?/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
The quickest solution might be to try to reinstall followed by another uninstall, or to use the Windows Install Cleanup Utility, (although Microsoft has removed it from their support site with the following disclaimer).
Notice
This article previously contained a link to the Windows Installer Cleanup utility (MSICUU2.exe). If you were directed to this article to solve a problem installing a product other than Microsoft Office, please contact your software manufacturer for installation support on the product.
While the Windows Installer Cleanup utility resolved some installation problems, it sometimes damaged other components installed on the computer. Because of this, the tool has been removed from the Microsoft Download Center.
Nonetheless, here is an active link and basic instructions:
http://majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=4459
1. To use the Windows CleanUp utility, follow these steps:
a. Click Start, point to Programs, and then click Windows Install Clean Up.
b. Select the program that you want to remove, and then click Remove.
c. Click OK, and then click Exit.
If these suggestions do not help, then perhaps a case should be opended with TAC and they could assist with gathering the installer log files.
-ken -
Windows 8 compatibility and WAAS Mobile.
Hi, everyone,
I have undertaken the possibly mad quest of getting WAAS Mobile working on Windows 8. I am currently receiving the error "TDI driver failed to initialize." Does anyone have any insight into that issue?
Thanks,
TomHolly,
Not news about it yet. You may discuss it with your Cisco Account team for additional details or requests.
Jorge
Mark it if used, the other customer can use it as reference in the future. -
Best practice with WCCP flows for WAAS
Hi,
I have a WAAS SRE 910 module in a 2911 router that intercepts packets from this router with WCCP.
All packets are received by external interface (gi 2/0, connected to a switch with port configured in WCCP vlan), and are sent back to the router via internal interface (gi 1/0 directly connected to the router) :
WAAS# sh interface gi 1/0
Internet Address : 10.0.1.1
Netmask : 255.255.255.0
Admin State : Up
Operation State : Running
Maximum Transfer Unit Size : 1500
Input Errors : 0
Input Packets Dropped : 0
Packets Received : 20631
Output Errors : 0
Output Packets Dropped : 0
Load Interval : 30
Input Throughput : 239 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
Output Throughput : 3270892 bits/sec, 592 packets/sec
Packets Sent : 110062
Auto-negotiation : On
Full Duplex : Yes
Speed : 1000 Mbps
WAAS# sh interface gi 2/0
Internet Address : 10.0.2.1
Netmask : 255.255.255.0
Admin State : Up
Operation State : Running
Maximum Transfer Unit Size : 1500
Input Errors : 0
Input Packets Dropped : 0
Packets Received : 86558
Output Errors : 0
Output Packets Dropped : 0
Load Interval : 30
Input Throughput : 2519130 bits/sec, 579 packets/sec
Output Throughput : 3431 bits/sec, 2 packets/sec
Packets Sent : 1580
Auto-negotiation : On
Full Duplex : Yes
Speed : 100 Mbps
The default route configured in WAAS module is 0.0.0.0/0 to 10.0.1.254 (router interface).
Would it be better that packets leave WAAS module by the external interface (in place of the internal interface) ?
Is there a best practice recommended by Cisco on this ?
Thanks.
StéphaneHi Stephane,
We usually advise the following in such scenario with an internal module:
"ip wccp 61 redirect in" the LAN interface.
"ip wccp 61 redirect in" on the WAN one.
"ip wccp redirect exclude in" on the internal interface between the WAAS and the router.
That way, we are sure that no loops are created because of the WCCP redirection.
Regards,
Nicolas -
What ports need to be open on Fw for Waas Communication--Urgent
Hi All,
This product is new to need your help in configuring this. I am explaining the architecture below:-
We have a requirement to use WAVE-594-K9 Software Release 5.3.1 and in our Manila location and it will not talk to Waas central Manager in our client location instead client has installed one same model Wave-594 in PHX.
So now client has said it will only be used for caching contents and not for optimizing, they have some video training on web which will be passed through this wave and for making them highly/fastly available to agents they want to use this.
We have installed one Wave in Manila in application-accelerator mode and using PBR to redirect the desired traffic via Wave. As per our client Manila Wave will talk to PHX wave and PHX wave will get registered to Waas Manager in client network.
We have firewall between PHX wave & Manila wave, please let me know do we need to opened tcp/udp ports on FW for opening the communication between these two waves?
and what else i need to configure on Manila wave?
This is very urgent quick reply will be highly appreciated!!
Thanks!!
BhishamThanks for the quick reply Kanwal!!
I checked with my team in PHX and we have Juniper FW in between these two Wave's, so what i understand from the links which you have shared.
In Manila Wave i need to configure that in Directed Mode and udp port 4050 needs to be opened bi-directionally on Juniper FW between IPs configured on wave devices.
In Manila we have 10.111.x.189 (Virtual-Blade IP) & 10.111.x.190 IPs & in PHX we 63.149.23.x & 63.149.23.x (VB) so from both IPs we required to open udp 4050 bi-directionally? Want to be sure before raising any request :-)
In PHX wave i am not sure whether we can configure that in directed mode and if it’s not then also it will work by opening port 4050 on FW Right?
In last our client was saying that Manila Wave will only be used as cache engine (VB is configured as content-engine) and it will download contents from PHX Wave (which is registered to CM at client side), what does it mean and do i need to do any special config on wave to achieve this?
I am very new to this device and lot of research on net confused me a lot, please don’t mind!!
Will wait for your reply then only i will raise request with FWteam.
Thanks,
Bhisham -
WaaS Central Manager - device serial number report available?
Hi folks,
just wondering if anyone knows a quick/easy way to talk to the WAAS database to pull serial number information for all of my WAE's installed. i have 35 devices scattered around 7 states and I'm hoping for an easy way to collect serial number info.
I was hoping the platform report from the CM would do it, but it does not provide serial numbers of each chasis, only model and software version.
My thought is the CM probably has this data somewhere? I'm hoping to avoid having to manually telnet to 35 appliances and run the command 'show inventory' to find the appliance I am looking for.
anyone have a good shortcut?
also - anyone know what the database format is? mysql? postgres?The best way to collect serial # remotely from a WAAS device (WAE) is by executing 'show hardware'. You may write a script to get it.
CM don't provide this info currently.
Can you please unicast me at '[email protected]' so that I will be able to understand your requirements.
thanks
Nat -
Can't Install WAAS in WAVE 574
Hi,
When I turn on WAVE 574, it said "No system disk/ disk error" (something like that). So I assume, there is no OS installed in the disk. I downloaded WAAS 4.4.1 rescue CD, and after a while, It said, "Can't determine boot device! Platform initialization failed". I checked front panel LED and the color for HDD is green. I tried to reseat the disk, but no luck ( It only has 1 disk). Is it problem because WAAS incompatibility with my WAVE, or HDD is being broken? I attached the log.Look inside the unit and see if the flash/usb key is plugged into the motherboard. The device intializes of that and then access the disk based software.
Dan -
There isn't any lights on the 4 port inline adapter in the WAAS. When I plug in a wire none of the ports light up. Is there some kind of configuration, That I need to do to turn on these ports? Please help! Thank you
Hi,
You definitely need an Inline Adapter to setup WAAS 674 for inline interception mode. The built in Gig interfaces cannot be used for inline interception but can be used for WCCP or PBR. Inline adapter comes in a group LAN port and a WAN port.
Regards
Kiran. -
WAAS and WCCP - looping packet detected
Hi,
Has anyone ran into this senario before. Before anyone answers with "move your WAE off the user subnet", it already has been.
I have wccp 61 redirect in on the user subnet (gig0/0.83 of a dot1q trunk). The WAE is on gig0/1. Before I apply wccp62 to the serial link, I attempt to telnet from a user pc to the router (same subnet, clients default gateway), and the telnet fails. I get a "looping packet detected" on the router console. It shows the source of the packet as the router (wccp router id actually), and the destination ip of the WAE, but the packet came in gig0/1 (interface connected to wae). Obviously the WAE returned the packet to the router (with the original GRE headers, (router as source)). I thought WCCP would understand this as "don't redirect this traffic to me anymore", but the router, actually tries to route it back down gig0/1 and then sees it as a looping packet. I believe the WAE is returning the encapsulated packet to the router to indicate it doesn't want the flow, and the router is attempting to route the GRE packet, instead of realizing it should remove the GRE header and route the internal packet. Router is IOS 12.4(12) as recommended by my Cisco engineer. 2821 router.
For kicks, I continue the WCCP setup on the datatcenter side. As expected, it doesn't work. When I apply the WCCP to the datacenter router (only redirecting lab subnet), the entire lab subnet is unreachable via TCP (but icmp still works as expected).
The WCCP configuration isn't very complex, I can't believe its something I'm doing. I think its a code issue.
Any advise?no "out" anywhere. The LAB router has a WAE list to only allow redirect to the lab WAE. I don't even need the 62 in on the WAN side, just applying 61 in on the LAN side breaks telnet to the router.
LOOPING PACKET DETECTION:
from router console
Feb 27 14:56:32.924: %IP-3-LOOPPAK: Looping packet detected and dropped -
src=132.242.11.18, dst=153.61.83.70, hl=20, tl=76, prot=47, sport=0, dport=0
in=GigabitEthernet0/1, nexthop=153.61.83.70, out=GigabitEthernet0/1
options=none -Process= "IP Input", ipl= 0, pid= 77 -Traceback= 0x410F6978 0x415CC960 0x415CDC60 0x415BBB38 0x415BCF18 0x415BD27C 0x415BD2FC 0x415BD4E8
Router configuration:
ip wccp 61 redirect-list REDIRECT-WAAS-SUBNETS-61 group-list remote-waas-box
interface Loopback0
ip address 132.242.11.18 255.255.255.255
h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 132.242.11.18
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.83
description << data vlan 83 >>
encapsulation dot1Q 83
ip address 153.61.83.3 255.255.255.192
ip helper-address 192.127.250.22
ip helper-address 149.25.1.182
no ip proxy-arp
ip wccp 61 redirect in
standby 83 ip 153.61.83.1
standby 83 priority 200
standby 83 preempt
standby 83 track Serial0/1/0:0.99 100
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description << WHQ LAB CE connection >>
ip address 153.61.83.65 255.255.255.192
load-interval 30
duplex full
speed 100
ip access-list standard remote-waas-box
permit 153.61.83.70
ip access-list extended REDIRECT-WAAS-SUBNETS-61
permit ip 153.61.83.0 0.0.0.63 any
WAE configuration:
device mode application-accelerator
primary-interface GigabitEthernet 1/0
interface GigabitEthernet 1/0
ip address 153.61.83.70 255.255.255.192
no autosense
bandwidth 100
full-duplex
exit
wccp router-list 1 153.61.83.65
wccp tcp-promiscuous router-list-num 1
wccp version 2
wccp slow-start enable -
we have a customer with 2 different versions of cisco waas
one is running 4.1 the other 4.0 both with their own CM
the CM of the 4.0 network should disappear and the sites should be migrated to the CM 4.1
the question is how to do this as for 4.0 you first have to do the devices before upgrading the CM and in 4.1 this is the other way around, first CM then the devices
is it possible that i first upgrade the devices, reboot and then assign them the new CM?With WAAS 4.1, the upgrade procedure has changed. The procedure described below should be followed:
1. Upgrade the standby Central Managers first (if any)
2. Upgrade the primary Central Manager
3. Upgrade all other WAEs.
In 4.1 upgrading devices configured for optimizatoin (Application Accelerator) to higher version than CM is not supported or recommended. So, pl follow the procedure described above. -
WAAS-4.1.5-b25 software?
I'm in the process of adding a new accelerator into our setup, today we use WAAS-4.1.5-b25 software version, but the "new" hardware have 4.1.3b.
I would like to just upgrade the new hardware to the same version we have in our setup, but cant find the WAAS-4.1.5-b25 on the cisco webpage download?
Any one who know where I can find WAAS-4.1.5-b25 image?
/HåkanHi Eric!
The result of a show version on one of the current hardware:
Cisco Wide Area Application Services Software (WAAS)
Copyright (c) 1999-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cisco Wide Area Application Services Software Release 4.1.5 (build b25 Sep 4 2009)
Version: oe474-4.1.5.25
Compiled 09:41:31 Sep 4 2009 by cnbuild
System was restarted on Thu Oct 22 14:11:08 2009.
The system has been up for 20 weeks, 1 hour, 12 minutes, 4 seconds.
Cisco Wide Area Application Services Central Manager
BR
Håkan -
Prepositioning in WAAS 4.1.1c
I am having trouble with this atm.
I have setup a test share on a remote server,with permissions etc and configured the relevant fields on WAAS GUI under -"File Services,Preposition".
I can broswe and find the directory and schedule the job to run.
The job seems to run ok,but when I go to the remote WAE and look at the Preposition Policy I am seeing no data actually being copied,just the Duration field is incrementing.The throughput field is also blank.
Any ideas?
Regards,
NickCan any help with this please?
-
Is there a way to set up e-mail alerting for when the central manager shows an alert. For instance recently one of our appliances show that a power supply is bad and needs to be replaced. I see in the central manager that there is a section for SMTP server info but according to the documentation I believe that this is only for notification of report jobs correct me if I am wrong. I also know that you can go to each device and set up notifications and provide the SMTP info there as well but I'm not sure if that will send the right information. I have looked on the device GUI that has the bad power supply and can't find anywhere in the GUI that says it has a bad power supply. The alert is only showing up in the central manager as well as if you SSH to the device and do a show alerts.
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Thanks in advanceHi Daniel,
Yes. You can do this but not from Central Manager.
Please login to the WAE directly. Please make sure to use IE as browser. Use this URL to login to WAE directly (bypassing WAE):
https://:8443
Login as admin. Once you login, click on Cisco WAE --> Configuration --> Notifier Tab. You will see Email Notification option. Please fill in the details and enable what level of SNMP alerts you want to recive from the device.
Please also make sure to enable SNMP alerts and configure SNMP options from CM for the device. Link on Central Manager: My WAN --> Manage Devices --> --> Configure --> Monitoring --> SNMP .
Here is the link to help you with SNMP configuration:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/waas/waas/v421/configuration/guide/SNMP.html
Please note that at this time, you can only enable email alerts from WAE on individual basis.
Hope this helps.
Regards.
PS: If this answers your question, please mark it as Answered. -
Hi all,
Is this Syslog Error Message affecting statistics in % Compression?
What is the cause of this ? It is tunned, or should be automaticaly resolved?
Best Regards,
Bruno Petrónio
*** Output ***
2009 Jul 30 11:33:13 wae so_dre: %WAAS-RE-3-690464: (74488:2) RE File Manager error: filemgr_state::do_io (segments) call pwrite(90, 0x51e7e008, 65536, 68485120): No space left on device
2009 Jul 30 11:33:13 wae so_dre: %WAAS-RE-3-690432: (74673:2) FileMgr failed in writing data-segment start at id=834779, error=0xfffffc09--Disk is full
2009 Jul 30 11:33:13 wae so_dre: %WAAS-RE-3-690464: (112823:2) RE File Manager error: filemgr_state::do_io (segments) call pwrite(90, 0x5140e008, 65536, 69271552): No space left on device
2009 Jul 30 11:33:13 wae so_dre: %WAAS-RE-3-690432: (112995:2) FileMgr failed in writing data-segment start at id=834791, error=0xfffffc09--Disk is full
wae#show disks details
Physical disk information:
disk00: Present WD-WCANY3489733 (h02 c00 i00 l00 - Int DAS-SATA)
238472MB(232.9GB)
disk01: Present WD-WCANY3489714 (h02 c00 i01 l00 - Int DAS-SATA)
238472MB(232.9GB)
Mounted file systems:
MOUNT POINT TYPE DEVICE SIZE INUSE FREE USE%
/sw internal /dev/md0 991MB 912MB 79MB 92%
/swstore internal /dev/md1 991MB 459MB 532MB 46%
/state internal /dev/md2 5951MB 191MB 5760MB 3%
/local/local1 SYSFS /dev/md4 11903MB 601MB 11302MB 5%
.../local1/spool PRINTSPOOL /dev/data1/spool 991MB 32MB 959MB 3%
/obj1 CONTENT /dev/data1/obj 125975MB 1013MB 124962MB 0%
/dre1 CONTENT /dev/data1/dre 59515MB 59514MB 1MB 99%
/ackq1 internal /dev/data1/ackq 1189MB 32MB 1157MB 2%
/plz1 internal /dev/data1/plz 2379MB 65MB 2314MB 2%
Software RAID devices:
DEVICE NAME TYPE STATUS PHYSICAL DEVICES AND STATUS
/dev/md0 RAID-1 NORMAL OPERATION disk00/00[GOOD] disk01/00[GOOD]
/dev/md1 RAID-1 NORMAL OPERATION disk00/01[GOOD] disk01/01[GOOD]
/dev/md2 RAID-1 NORMAL OPERATION disk00/02[GOOD] disk01/02[GOOD]
/dev/md3 RAID-1 NORMAL OPERATION disk00/03[GOOD] disk01/03[GOOD]
/dev/md4 RAID-1 NORMAL OPERATION disk00/04[GOOD] disk01/04[GOOD]
/dev/md5 RAID-1 NORMAL OPERATION disk00/05[GOOD] disk01/05[GOOD]
Disk encryption feature is disabled.
wae# sho disks failed-disk-id
Disk location Serial Number
wae# sho disks failed-sectors
disk00
=========
(none)
disk01
=========
(none)
wae#Thank You very much Zach,
It seems to be the case.
It was a Demo in a client, which in some time we decide to upgrade the memory, cause a persistent tfo limition alarm.
The final results were not good about % of Optimization and Compression/Traffic Reduction.
But, what the hell, we are always learning !
Thanks a lot.
Bruno Petrónio -
Hello experts,
I have a problem about the WAAS optimization.
The topology is...
Center: 7200 Router working with WCCP (512 WAE)
Edge: 2800 Router working with WCCP (612 WAE)
When i tried to reach the Database (behind the 7200 Router) from the Edge site. its working! but during this time, when i look the Current Connection status, there is no optimization traffic(you can see the attach file).
I have done this setup, demo etc. too many times, but the first time i encountered such a problem.
you can see the configuration at the below.
By the way, when i look the "show ip wccp" command output. there is no traffic on Service identifier 62. Do we need to see increased this traffic?
Thanks in advance for your help.
BM-7206-METRO#show ip wccp
Global WCCP information:
Router information:
Router Identifier: 10.200.200.193
Protocol Version: 2.0
Service Identifier: 61
Number of Service Group Clients: 1
Number of Service Group Routers: 1
Total Packets s/w Redirected: 37207
Process: 0
Fast: 0
CEF: 37207
Service mode: Open
Service access-list: -none-
Total Packets Dropped Closed: 0
Redirect access-list: 199
Total Packets Denied Redirect: 1074214
Total Packets Unassigned: 0
Group access-list: -none-
Total Messages Denied to Group: 0
Total Authentication failures: 0
Total Bypassed Packets Received: 0
Service Identifier: 62
Number of Service Group Clients: 1
Number of Service Group Routers: 1
Total Packets s/w Redirected: 0
Process: 0
Fast: 0
CEF: 0
Service mode: Open
Service access-list: -none-
Total Packets Dropped Closed: 0
Redirect access-list: -none-
Total Packets Denied Redirect: 0
Total Packets Unassigned: 0
Group access-list: -none-
Total Messages Denied to Group: 0
Total Authentication failures: 0
Total Bypassed Packets Received: 0
CORE_WAE
configure terminal
primary-interface gigabitEthernet 1/0
device mode application-accelerator
central-manager address 10.10.10.10
cms enable
wccp version 2
wccp router-list 1 2.2.2.1 (ROUTER IP add)
wccp tcp-promiscuous router-list-num 1
EDGE_WAE
configure terminal
primary-interface gigabitEthernet 1/0
device mode application-accelerator
central-manager address 10.10.10.10
cms enable
wccp version 2
wccp router-list 1 1.1.1.1
wccp tcp-promiscuous router-list-num 1
CORE_ROUTER
ip wccp version 2
ip wccp 61
ip wccp 62
interface gi 2/0 (LAN)
ip wccp 61 redirect in
interface gi 3/0.26 (WAN) (Note: also this interface have a Tunnel int. connect to edge router tunnel int.)
ip wccp 62 redirect in
interface gi 1/0 (WAE LAN)
ip wccp redirect exclude in
ip cef
EDGE_ROUTER
ip wccp version 2
ip wccp 61
ip wccp 62
interface gi 1/0 (LAN)
ip wccp 61 redirect in
interface ATM 2/0.1 (WAN) (Note: also this interface have a Tunnel int. connect to central router tunnel int.)
ip wccp 62 redirect in
interface gi 2/0 (WAE LAN)
ip wccp redirect exclude in
ip cefHi Zach
Center router IOS version is c7200-advipservicesk9_li-mz.124-11.T.bin
Edge router IOS version is c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-9.T2.bin
Also you can see the configurations at the attach
Thanks,
My best.
CORE WAE CONFIG:
Based on the input, the following configurations will be done:
central-manager address 10.166.0.10
interface GigabitEthernet 1/0
ip address 10.166.0.20 255.255.0.0
autosense
exit
ip default-gateway 10.166.0.1
ip name-server 10.201.0.201
ip domain-name tcmb.gov.tr
primary-interface GigabitEthernet 1/0
hostname CORE
clock timezone UTC 0 0
wccp version 2
wccp router-list 8 10.166.0.1
wccp tcp-promiscuous router-list 8
cms enable
EDGE WAE CONFIG:
Based on the input, the following configurations will be done:
central-manager address 10.166.0.10
interface GigabitEthernet 1/0
ip address 10.126.2.20 255.255.255.0
autosense
exit
ip default-gateway 10.126.2.1
ip name-server 10.201.0.201
ip domain-name tcmb.gov.tr
primary-interface GigabitEthernet 1/0
hostname EDGE
clock timezone UTC 0 0
wccp version 2
wccp router-list 8 10.126.2.1
wccp tcp-promiscuous router-list 8
cms enable -
Waas: problems with peers identification
good days all.
we have got a problems with peers' identification in waas solution.
topology: 1 central-manager and 2 nme-502, both nme located in different location and subnets, and both see each other (pings are available from nme to nme). Version of solution 4.1.3b
But one device on the central-manager page in point "TFO Peer List Reported ByDevice" show ip for distant device, but distant device in the same point shows "There are currently no Peers to display".
And no any optimization actions
All troubleshooting methodology and guidances are useless....
with hope to help, thanksLet's start by making sure that interception and redirection are working properly. You can start with the troubleshooting guide here:
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_WAAS_Troubleshooting_Guide_for_Release_4.1.3_and_Later_--_Troubleshooting_WCCP
Regards,
Zach
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I determine what computers are home sharing??
How can I determine what computers are home sharing??
-
Windows XP SP 3 - Blackberry Desktop Manager 6.0.2 Will Not Open
When I try to start the desktop manager software I immediately get the windows message: "BlackBerry Desktop Software has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience." I've consulted many resources and tried several
-
How to have iPhone 5c remember a forgotten device
I accidentally told my iPhone to forget my Jambox bluetooth device and now the phone won't find it. I have reset the settings of the phone and did a soft reset of the Jambox but my phone is still not finding the device. I did also do this on anothe
-
I phone 6 will randomly shut down
My phone will suddenly shut down when it still has a charge. Requires me to plug in charger and wait 10-15 mins before I can try to turn it back on.
-
Satellite A300D-126 PSAK4E display is distorted at start up
Hi i have a harman/kardon and the problem is that the display is distorted at start u most times, sometimes after some time using utp, flikkering screen horizontal lines appear everywhere but when i logged in windows vista the display is working fine