WAN connection to 1 specific LAN RV320

Hi,
I have one cisco RV320, I use 2 wan connections with different isp.
It is possible to go out just with one ISP to one of the 4 LAN ports ?
I need one specific LAN port to have internet connection just from a specific wan1 or wan 2, and the other lan ports to use load balancing feature.
It is possible?
Thanks

Hello,
The RV320 has a feature called Protocol Binding that will allow you to link a single or a range of IP addresses on the LAN to use a specific WAN connection for an specific protocol.
Here is a document on how to configure such feature:
http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=d6c17b6ee53141f59ae03c6defeb20cb_Dual_WAN_Configuration_on_RV320_Router.xml&pid=2&respid=0&snid=4&dispid=0&cpage=search
If what you are intending to do is to force, lets say a range of IP addresses on the LAN to only use WAN 1 as the outbound connection for all the traffic, then you want to configure the protocol binding as follows:
Service = Any
Source IP: Beginning of the range or single address
to: End of range or singe address
Destination IP: 0.0.0.0 (Anywhere on the internet)
to: 0.0.0.0 (Anywhere on the internet)
Interface: WAN 1
Status: Mark the checkmark to enable it.
Please remember that you can Bind the protocols via IP addresses and no specific LAN ports.
I hope this helps
Please don't forget to mark the answer as correct or grade it if it was helpful to you so that other members can benefit from it.

Similar Messages

WAN Connection

I want to connect my Dish Network receiver to my network which requires a WAN connection. I have these 3 unused LAN connections in the back of my Airport Extreme. Is there a way to connect a device requiring the WAN connection into a LAN port?
Thanks!

Welcome to the discussions!
Normally, the WAN port is used on a router for the connection to a modem so that a network will have internet access. If you unplug your modem from the WAN port, you will no longer have access to the internet.
Check the documentation again. I can't speak for Dish, but DirectTV specifies that you need to connect to a LAN port to gain advanced features for downloading movies. Same for DVD players.
Try connecting to one of the LAN ports from your Dish receiver. Be sure to completely power down the Dish receiver by pulling the plug from the wall (the on/off switch will only put it in standby) and then restart it to connect. You will probably have to follow an on screen menu process to make this connection.

Airport Extreme(SW) keeps dropping the WAN connection under "heavy" load

Hey,
Have had this problem ever since I got the Airport Extreme when it first came out and I got it.
The problem is this : The connection will work just fine for ages, but if I end up downloading something using (primarily this is the problem) torrents and I end up getting a rather good speed on it the airport will all of the sudden stop getting data from the WAN(ADSL modem connected to it through the WAN connection) and the Airport will have to be restarted. Some days it will have to be restarted up towards 15 times a day.
The Airport remains accessible through the LAN connection, as well as through the WiFi when it has failed like this so I can go in through the Airport Admin Utility and restart the unit without any problems whatsoever. The modem does not need restart or reiniting either.
The problem occurs no matter of if I am on the hard wired (LAN) connection or the WiFi connection. If I download something using a torrent that is high speed, especially if its more then one torrent at the same time (say 4 torrents each running at 200-300kbps therefor peaking at the roof of what my DSL connection can handle) then it will absolutely lock up after a minute or so. If I only do surfing or 'ordinary' work then there is no problem.
The problem is easily repeated.
* If I connect my laptop by wire to the modem directly without the airport in between there will be no problem.
* I have software reseted the Airport many times to attempt to fix the problem when it has gotten on my nerves with no positive or changing result.
* I have the latest available from Apple firmware(5.6) installed on the Airport.
* I have no 'weird' or abnormal settings set on the Airport, and no neighbors playing tricks on me - This problem was with me when I used the airport fully locked down in a office environment and then went with it when I moved my airport unit out of my office in to my home.
* I have no other wifi units in the house that may cause problems, no bluetooth phones running amok.
Airport details:
Apple Airport Extreme Base Station
Firmware Version: 5.6
Wireless Security : Not currently enabled
Wireless Channel : 1 (automatic)
Built in modem : No
Prod # : M8930LL/A (A-1034)

Hi guys,
Recently I bought AirPort Extreme 802.11n Base Station (Gigabit, MB053LL/A), and
seems, I have very similar problem with yours. Internet connection from my ISP over WAN is dropped after few hours of being idle. The router successfully receives its IP settings from provider's DHCP, eveyithing is working fine at first and as long as I have some inet activity. Then I disconnect, or sleep my laptops, and when I'm back - WAN provides no Internet traffic at all It looks like WAN is not functioning or blocked in someway. AirPort Utility and logs show no problems, all statuses are good, correct WAN IP settings are shown in the utility.
Sometimes it helps to plug-out/in Ethernet cable to WAN port, but more often only full router restart helps (with around 10-20 secs of outage). BTW, WiFi connection between the router and laptops is pretty stable and causes absolutely no probs. HDD connected to the router works good also.
My firmware is 7.2.1 (gigabit), and reading above posts I tried to downgrade to 7.2. It didn't fix the problem So well there are no earlier firmware versions for this AEBS model to try.
Does anybody have ideas about it?
(I understand you guys mostly wrote about 100Mbit version of AEBS)
Thanks you,
Strim

NEED HELP PLEASE Setting up 2 VLANS and a redundant WAN connection

I have a remote branch office which is actually a huge bar/lounge. The bar wants to enable patrons to access the Internet with their wireless laptops. I want to prevent those patrons from accessing our private network, and also prevent them from traversing our static VPN tunnel back to HQ.
The bar processes all credit cards via the T1 connection, and this has caused us to lose money every time the T1 goes down while we're open, since there is no WAN redundancy right now.
Here is my current hardware configuration:
1) one PIX 501 50-user 3des.
2.) two Dell 3024
3.) one Aironet 1100(g) AP.
Current LAN Network: 10.35.35.0
(internal employees only, static VPN tunneled to remote HQ network)
Current Wireless SSID's:
SSID1=PRIVATESSID
SSID2=PUBLICSSID (not currently in use, waiting to figure this out)
Current WAN: one T1 connection.
WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO AND NEED HELP FIGURING OUT:
#1a) I want to create two separate VLAN's that are able to share the WAN connection, but not be able to "see" each other.
#1b) These VLAN's would be mapped to their respective SSID's on the AP (PRIVATESSID>10.35.35.0 and PUBLICSSID>192.168.1.0).
#1c) The 192.168.1.0 network should not be able to traverse the static tunnel between the branch site and HQ.
#2) I would like to install a backup WAN connection such as a modem 56k dial-up to an ISP or a cable modem to an ISP. In case the primary T1 goes down, I would like the router to automatically dial out over the modem conection and route all Internet bound traffic over that backup WAN connection, until the primary comes back online.
Question 1:
I'm assuming I need a router to do the intervlan routing. Could this router also do the on-demand WAN backup dialing to an ISP via analog modem?
What IOS version and flavor (IP base, IP+, etc.) would I need? What is the cheapest router I can do all that with (i.e. 2620/2621/1720/3600 series)? What WIC's or NM's would I need?
Question Two:
I would like to prioritize PRIVATESSID's traffic over PUBLICSSID's traffic, which I know I can do on the access point. Can I do this on the router so that any 10.35.35.0 traffic takes priority over any 192.168.1.0 traffic?
Question Three
If the primary T1 WAN connection goes down, I don't want the router to re-route the 192.168.1.0 traffic over the backup 56k dial-up WAN connection. That traffic can wait until the T1 comes back up.
Any help you can provide would be very much appreciated.

Assuming your access points can place SSID into separate vlans and support 802.1q trunks then I can attempt to answer your questions. There are seperate secuity issues with both SSID for protection and VLANs for seperation but in your case in may be minimal.
q1
Any cisco router that will run 802.1q trunking will work. Since you are looking at older routers you will need IP+ to get it. Even 2610's will support 802.1q on their 10m ethernet at the correct code level but 10m and 802.1q is sorta nonstandard. Since your backup is only 56k you can use the internal modem port as a dial backup. A wic-2a/s will also work if you prefer not to use the modem port. You will need some wic to run your t1 line. If you are planning to leave the t1 on another router it makes the next 2 questions much harder.
q2
This is fairly simple and depends on your ios level. "priority queing" is supported on even the older software. I assume you do not control the far end of the t1 line since it sounds as if this goes to a ISP.
You will need to have them do the QoS since most issues with the internet are inbound and not outbound. You can only control outbound traffic.
q3
If the T1 is on the same router then this is fairly simple. You can just put a floating static default route in that will cause the dialer to come up if the the t1 goes down. There is no easy way to protect against the line being up but no traffic passing. This is also why it would be best to have the t1 on the same router. If its not you will need to get very creative to solve this. You could build a GRE tunnel to a remote location and montior the tunnel or run a routing protcol over the tunnel. In the newest software you could use SAA and policy routing to force the traffic over the dialer but the router must support ios 12.4.
3a. You mentioned a cable modem as a backup. That can be much easier sometimes since it is all routing and no dialer interfaces with nasty modem issues. This does not make the issue of the t1 not on the same router easier.

RV016 with 3 WAN Connections - Windows Messenger Intermittent problems.

I have a RV016 Router with 3 internet DSL conections.
Firmware version : 3.0.0.1-tm (Jun 6 2008 20:17:06)
LAN IP : 192.168.11.254 /24
WAN1 IP : 192.168.1.253 /24
WAN2 IP : 192.168.2.253 /24
WAN3 IP : 192.168.3.253 /24
MODE: Gateway.
Windows Messenger continually connects and disconnects. This behavior is permanent
I only have problems with Messengers (all releases), web page access is correct.
I check bandwith saturation and It's ok, I use less than 50% of each DSL.
I configured the correct size of MTU for each DSL and the problem continues.
Is there any way to set priority to this service?
Is there any way to check if the "load balance mode" affect this kind of connections?
I appreciate any idea.

Changing the DSL connections to bridge mode is part one of the solution. When they weren't in bridge mode, they were also acting as gateways/routers, probably also doing NAT.
Now that they are in bridge mode, the rv016 has control of the connections and the routing. Now that it has control, you can make the appropriate changes.
I ran into a similar issue as yours when I had an rv082 at one of my businesses. I had to access the state's web site to file sales taxes online. But their system detected when my router used a different WAN connection than the one I logged in on, so it would kick me off each time the router used both WAN connections. I could enable only one WAN connection each time I used their system (which would also work in your case with messenger), but that wasn't a real solution.
For you the solution will be a port trigger range. (For me the solution was to bind that destination site to a WAN connection.) Go to Setup-->Forwarding in the rv016 web management. You will see a section for port triggering at the bottom. Here's a link to a site that goes more into detail on the ports that need to have triggers on them:
http://www.electrictoolbox.com/article/networking/open-firewall-msn-icq/
I don't have messenger setup, so I don't know the ports off-hand. This setup should allow any system connected (just as they are now) to properly use messenger.
Let me know if you need any more help.

Can the WAN port be used as LAN when AirPort Express (2nd Generation) is setup to join a wireless network?

Can the WAN port be used as LAN when AirPort Express (2nd Generation) is setup to join a wireless network? (IE: 2 LAN ports)
I haven't been able to get a clear answer on this. I believe the 1st generation would act as WAN/LAN depending on setting, but what happens with the 2nd generation?
Thank you for your time.

If the Express joins a wireless network wirelessly, in other words its WAN port isn't connected to anything, the correct way to connect a wired client to it is by using its LAN port.
I don't know what would happen if you were to connect a wired client to its WAN port instead — it's just not supposed to be used for that purpose. It won't permanently break anything if you were to try it though. If you were, the worst that would occur is that your network would become unresponsive as packets continuously traverse its WAN port in a circular fashion, which might require that you power down your router to reset your whole network.
If you are already using your Express's LAN port and you need another, the way to provide more ports is to purchase an inexpensive ($10 or so) switch. Connect it to the LAN port and as many other pieces of equipment as the switch's available number of ports.
You're correct about the first generation with the single Ethernet port. It could be used in either capacity depending on its configuration.

SA 540 drops wan connectivity after some time interval

hello guys,
I have problem. after a certain period of time (ranging from 2 minutes to several hours) the unit keeps dropping the WAN connection, making the unit unaccessible from the WAN side. The strange thing is, that when the connection is dropped, the unit is perfectly accessible from the LAN side, the WAN LED is still on, status info shows the WAN link up, and packet trace shows broadcasted traffic on the WAN interface, so only the directed communication to and from the ISPs gateway (configured to fix IP) seems to be blocked for some reason. When this happens, then plugging the WAN cable to the Optional WAN port enables traffic again, but it is also dropped after some time, and then only power cycling the unit restores WAN connectivity.
please suggest me as soon as possiblethat how to fix this problem?
Awaiting for valuable reply.....

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, by a font conflict, or by corruption of the file system or of certain system caches.
Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards, if applicable. Start up in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. You must hold down the shift key twice: once when you turn on the computer, and again when you log in.
Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the startup volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
Safe mode is much slower to start up and run than normal, with limited graphics performance, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain models. The next normal startup may also be somewhat slow.
The login screen appears even if you usually login automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin.
Test while in safe mode. Same problem?
After testing, restart as usual (not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

WRT54GL frequently drops WAN connection

Hi,
I'm having a problem with my WRT54GL 1.1 router, namely it has a nasty habit of dropping WAN DSL connection. Firstly I attributed this to modem, but my ISP's tech support sent me a list of connection resets that are caused by the router not the modem. This happens about 20x a day, lasts for about 20 sec, then reconnect, works fine for a while and the whole cycle is repeated again. As you can imagine it is very frustrating.
I have the router upgraded to firmware rev. 4.30.11 and am using router's DHCP server.
Also: before you suggest it - I have connected my IskraTel Ganymede 822+ DSL modem directly to my PC and the connection is completely stable.
Any suggestion would be appreciated.
With kind regards,
Bostjan Ursic

It is difficult to be sure from the documentation, but it appears that your "DSL modem" is actually a "DSL modem router", and it uses the same 192.168.1.x subnet as the WRT54GL.
To fix your problem, you will need to make one or more changes. First, power down your entire network, then disconnect the WRT54GL from your modem. Then wire one computer to a LAN port on the WRT54GL, and login to the WRT54GL. Change the "Local IP address" to 192.168.2.1   Then click the "Save Settings" button and wait (3 to 60 seconds) for the screen to refresh. You will likely be disconnected from the WRT54GL. This is normal, so do not worry about that. Power down your entire network.
Next, using an ethernet cable, connect one of the LAN ports on the "modem" to the Internet port of the WRT54GL.   Boot up your system. Did this correct the problem?
If you still have problems, please post the following info:
1) What "Internet Connection Type" is the WRT54GL set to?
2) Is the DHCP server turned on in the 822+ modem?   (Note: I assume that the DHCP server is turned on in the WRT54GL.)
Message Edited by toomanydonuts on 08-25-2008 05:39 PM

WAN Connectivity Failure

My connection on my iMac seems to drop out quite often for seemingly no reason. So i ran Wireless Diagnostics and let it monitor overnight and saw this...
08/15/14 02:55:17.6000
LAN: WiFi interface can ping IPv4 router 172.16.0.1 . . . pass
08/15/14 02:55:17.6820
WAN: WiFi interface can ping DNS server 17.254.0.50 . . . pass
08/15/14 02:55:22.4820
Link Quality Changed : rssi=-72 dBm, txRate=54 Mbps
08/15/14 02:55:27.4820
Link Quality Changed : rssi=-72 dBm, txRate=243 Mbps
08/15/14 02:55:32.4820
Link Quality Changed : rssi=-72 dBm, txRate=162 Mbps
08/15/14 02:55:37.4830
Link Quality Changed : rssi=-72 dBm, txRate=81 Mbps
08/15/14 02:55:42.4830
Link Quality Changed : rssi=-71 dBm, txRate=162 Mbps
08/15/14 02:55:47.4860
Link Quality Changed : rssi=-71 dBm, txRate=81 Mbps
08/15/14 02:55:52.4880
Link Quality Changed : rssi=-71 dBm, txRate=13 Mbps
08/15/14 02:55:54.1640
Scan Cache Updated
08/15/14 02:55:57.3430
LAN: WiFi interface can ping IPv4 router 172.16.0.1 . . . pass
08/15/14 02:55:57.4880
Link Quality Changed : rssi=-72 dBm, txRate=27 Mbps
08/15/14 02:55:59.3500
No WAN Connectivity
08/15/14 02:56:01.3530
No WAN Connectivity
08/15/14 02:56:02.4880
Link Quality Changed : rssi=-72 dBm, txRate=243 Mbps
08/15/14 02:56:03.3580
No WAN Connectivity
08/15/14 02:56:05.3620
No WAN Connectivity
08/15/14 02:56:05.3620
WAN: WiFi interface can ping DNS server 17.254.0.50 . . . fail
08/15/14 02:56:05.3620
UNEXPECTED DROP DETECTED!!!
08/15/14 02:56:17.4880
Link Quality Changed : rssi=-72 dBm, txRate=40 Mbps
08/15/14 02:56:22.4880
Link Quality Changed : rssi=-71 dBm, txRate=243 Mbps
# --- Monitor Test Cases
08/15/14 02:56:33.7210
No WAN Connectivity
08/15/14 02:56:33.7210
WAN: WiFi interface can ping DNS server 17.254.0.50 . . . fail
# --- Monitor Summary
08/15/14 02:56:53.4640
WAN Connectivity Failure
I've ran the same thing a couple times recently besides this as well and same thing is occuring.
My iMac is the only device this happens on. Sometimes it won't reconnect to the wifi automatically when i reboot my Airport Extreme (it's a 4th gen)
Any thoughts or ideas to try?

Sometimes going up to your Wireless strength icon and click it and then choose Open Network Preferences. Then select turn WiFi Off. Then wait a minute and Turn WiFi On. Make sure you are connected to your Network, Make sure that WiFi has the green dot and if it isn!t already Drag it to the top of the list. Other. Times you may need to change your router channel from the default setting from 6 to 10. This holds true if you live in an area where there is a lot of traffic, and all other routers are set to the default of 6. as you can see if everyone is on channel 6 this can cause a very high traffic issue and you need to change your channel number.
Cheers
Don

LRT224 hickups: dropping WAN connection??

Hi,
my new LRT224 shows hickups in my connection.
It is hooked up to a 100Mbit fiber connection from my isp.
If I try to stream video, it creates every minute or so a second or two pause in the transmission.
Clearly, this breaks my continuous video stream.
The device log (shown below) does report 'WAN connection is down', which seems rather strange and unexpected to me.
If I don't stream video, and the data link is nearly idle, these intermittent 'WAN is down' messages do continue.
If I take the LRT out, and connect my PC directly to the isp line (yes, bad practice) I don't have such hickups, and the video streams fine (at a few mbit/sec).
I updated the firmware to v1.0.1.01 but that didn't make a difference.
I actually disabled the 2nd WAN port.
In the 'dual WAN' config, the 'Enable network Service Detection' is not marked. Selecting 'Link failover' or 'Load balance' does not show any difference (no improvement).
Any clue why the LRT would report 'WAN connection is down'???
I urgently need some solution, but the issue seems beyond my skills...
(In the log I also see 'policy violation's. I have no idea why these occur: I have no firewall rules on those LAN or WAN IP addresses...)
Thanks for any insight!
Jos
This is a caption of the device log:
Feb 26 18:28:37 2014 System Log WAN connection is down
Feb 26 18:28:38 2014 System Log WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
Feb 26 18:30:51 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.106:55059->173.192.114.54:7031 on eth1
Feb 26 18:30:58 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.108:65516->89.248.168.42:3129 on eth1
Feb 26 18:31:33 2014 System Log WAN connection is down
Feb 26 18:31:34 2014 System Log WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
Feb 26 18:31:36 2014 ACCESS_RULE TCP 192.168.1.107:65516->157.55.56.153:3129 on eth0
Feb 26 18:31:37 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.106:55159->199.9.249.46:1935 on eth1
Feb 26 18:31:37 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.106:55158->199.9.249.46:1935 on eth1
Feb 26 18:31:37 2014 ACCESS_RULE TCP 192.168.1.107:55158->157.55.56.153:1935 on eth0
Feb 26 18:31:51 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.106:55059->173.192.114.54:7031 on eth1
Feb 26 18:32:50 2014 System Log WAN connection is down
Feb 26 18:32:51 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.108:49527->78.235.240.121:57236 on eth1
Feb 26 18:32:51 2014 System Log WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
Feb 26 18:33:51 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.106:55059->173.192.114.54:7031 on eth1
Feb 26 18:33:58 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.108:49374->89.248.168.42:3129 on eth1
Feb 26 18:34:51 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.106:55059->173.192.114.54:7031 on eth1
Feb 26 18:34:59 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.108:49499->90.24.175.227:57402 on eth1
Feb 26 18:39:06 2014 ACCESS_RULE TCP 192.168.1.107:49499->111.221.74.31:57402 on eth0
Feb 26 18:39:13 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.108:49837->89.248.168.42:3129 on eth1
Feb 26 18:39:13 2014 ACCESS_RULE TCP 192.168.1.107:49837->65.55.223.46:3129 on eth0
Feb 26 18:39:57 2014 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 192.168.1.108:49584->92.142.109.203:57209 on eth1
Feb 26 18:42:32 2014 System Log WAN connection is down
Feb 26 18:42:33 2014 System Log WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
Feb 26 18:43:16 2014 System Log WAN connection is down
Feb 26 18:43:18 2014 System Log WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
Feb 26 18:49:53 2014 System Log WAN connection is down
Feb 26 18:49:54 2014 System Log WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
Feb 26 18:50:42 2014 System Log WAN connection is down
Feb 26 18:50:44 2014 System Log WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
Solved!
Go to Solution.

There is a new update firmware for LRT224.

Layer 2 WAN Connectivity

Hi all.
This is something new for me and I'd appreciate any help.
We have currently a Layer 2 WAN connection through a 3rd party provider. They use 3400 switches to connect two different sites. One is our DC and the other one is the client. In our DC we have two switches in stack mode 3750Gs. The client has two Dell switches in stack mode as well - Layer 3 switches. We need to configure communications of both sites via the link to perform replication. We do not want VLANs to go through the WAN. What is the best way of configuring our switches? We cannot configure the 3rd party switches.
Thanks for your help.

Hi ,
If you have got VPLS services from your service provider , You can perform replication between two location , without any addition VLAN creation on your switches . (Same VLAN can be spanned between both datacenter) .
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/ios-nx-os-software/virtual-private-lan-services-vpls/index.html
If it DWDM link , You can ask your service provider to create new VLAN for your replication , same can extended to your both end switches .
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/storage/san_switches/mds9000/sw/rel_3_x/configuration/guides/fm_3_4_x/dwdm.pdf
HTH
Sandy

Srp521w voip ports with no wan connected

Hello.
I need some help. I am trying to connect my voice ports to my SIP server but is not working.
I have a lot of this same srp521 working all arround perfectly, except that they are connected to mpls via Wan.
In this new workaround, i want the router to act as a AP and to have those 2 voip ports working with the router connected just to the lan of my network, no wan connection, but it seems to be a problem on this that.
Is it possible to have the voip ports working on just with a lan connection?
Thanks, best regards.

Hi EveryoneI
created an etherchannel on two ports (2960 switch) and placed them into
an etherchannel. Did the same on the other switch Cisco 3020 blade
chassis switch. Without connecting any cables the 2960 had done an
up/down sequence as though a cable had been connected and yet this had
not been done. Can someone try and help with what could be the
technical explanation of this interesting phenomena. the etherchannel
was a trunk and the ports were sitting in vlan 200 and this vlan was
also configured as the native vlan for the trunk.Please, please help - any comment is appreciated.Sydney
Hi Sydney,
It can be possible that speed and duplex setting between the switches are not in sync. Configure all interfaces in an EtherChannel to operate at the same speeds and duplex modes.Enable all interfaces in an EtherChannel. If you shut down an interface in an EtherChannel, it is treated as a link failure, and its traffic is transferred to one of the remaining interfaces in the EtherChannel.
For EtherChannels:
–Assign all interfaces in the EtherChannel to the same VLAN, or configure them as trunks.
–If you configure an EtherChannel from trunk interfaces, verify that the trunking mode (802.1Q) is the same on all the trunks. Inconsistent trunk modes on EtherChannel interfaces can have unexpected results.
–An EtherChannel supports the same allowed range of VLANs on all the interfaces in a trunking Layer 2
Hope to help
If helpful do rate the post
Ganesh.H

SA540 - Continuously drops wan connection

It's been nothing but a nightmare since i've gotten the 540. My firmware is 1.1.42 and I have a very basic setup with only a couple of standard firewall rules. The 540 keeps dropping the wan connection. Everything is static on the LAN side and DHCP is turned off on the 540 with Static IP for the WAN. I've factory reset twice and reconfiged everything exactly the same with of course the same results...help!!!
Thanks
James

This is probably worthy of a case with high priority at the SBSC (small business support center - aka TAC).
That is the new FW and you have factory reset so sounds like you have dont everything they way you should have.
There are a few things to try...
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
Firewall -> Attacks
Under ICSA settings, uncheck the box for block fragmented packets.
Also, lower the MTU size and see if that helps (usually do this for DSL).
Also, see if you can collect a WAN trace (easy on this appliance) using Administration: Diagnostics: Packet Trace (turn it on, catch the anomaly, then turn it off). This will open into Wireshark (formerly Ethereal) right on your PC.
Steve

Extending a wifi network, two WAN Connections

I'm in an apartment that has WAN connections dotted all over it (every room has at least one hard wired WAN access point - no configuration required to access the internet, all you have to do is plug in a router). I have an airport extreme (time capsule actually) set up in a room that is relatively central to the apartment. However between all of the rooms the walls are quite significant to the point that while I've used Airport Expresses to extend the network reasonably effectively for browsing (all rooms are covered), in any room that doesn't have the Airport Extreme in it, streaming content to an Apple TV results in unnaceptable quality. Move the Extreme into that room (WAN ports in every room), it's fine.
So what I'd like to do is either configure the expresses to plug into the WAN ports in each room but still all be on one wifi network, but instead of having to reach through two/three heavy walls to get back to the Extreme, then reach all the way back and transmit to the Apple TV, I could have the airport in the room just go to the internet straight through the wall connection that in most cases sits right next to it.
If expresses can't do this I am willing to invest in a new Extreme as well if that would help.
In short I want multiple airports, all on the same WiFi network but accessing the internet from whichever airport has the strongest signal. Also if I'm in a room a long way from the primary Extreme and I want to stream to the Apple TV from a laptop, I want it to bounce just through the Airport in that room, not have to go all the way back to the primary Airport.
The layout of the apartment doesn't really give me much scope for doing anything with connecting by ethernet cables unfortunately.

DGBaas wrote:
I'm in an apartment that has WAN connections dotted all over it (every room has at least one hard wired WAN access point - no configuration required to access the internet, all you have to do is plug in a router).
All those WAN ports run back to a main switch somewhere in the building.. and that connects to a router that gives you internet access..
I have never heard of a place that gives you WAN outlets in every room.. how many can you use at once??
Talk to the building services IT admin as they might be happy to help you out.. the multiple units can only connect back to the main switch.. the danger here is so does everyone elses network.. if you take away the router you lose the protection.. if you have the router in place .. you cannot use the WAN ports as LAN. Each router protects the local LAN network from access by Joe Blow down the hall.
But if the system is complex enough you can be assigned a block of IP addresses on a vlan.. and use the building infrastructure as your own personal LAN.. with good security..
Only the buildings admin can do that for you.. otherwise don't even think about it.. you will expose your network to outsiders.. or you will need extremely complicated vpn which means replacing all your apple routers anyway.

How many WAN connections (Rj45) supported on ISR G2 router

Hi
How many WAN connections (Rj45) supported on ISR G2 router ?
If my router have the data license can I do load balancing between 3 or more WAN connection ?
Thanks & Regards
Lakshman Kumar S

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
As Rick and Reza have both noted, number of routable Ethernet ports varies per ISR G2 model. Ethernet switch options would allow the most Ethernet ports, but you need to route through them using SVIs.
However, most ISR G2s often do not have the performance capacity to run their built-in Ethernet ports at full capacity. Often the add-in Ethernet ports have bandwidth restrictions to/from the port.
Basically, ISR G2 routers were designed to have a LAN Ethernet connection and some WAN, non-Ethernet connection, of much less bandwidth.
ISR G2 router performance is also very much impacted by device configuration.

WAN connection to 1 specific LAN RV320

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for