Want to Avoid Loop for all entries with select query !!

Hi Guru's  !
This is my following code . I want to avoid loop  to improve the performance of program.
data: lt_cuhd type HASHED TABLE OF /sapsll/cuhd WITH UNIQUE key guid_cuhd,
      ls_cuhd type /sapsll/cuhd.
data: lt_comments type STANDARD TABLE OF zss_comments,
      ls_comments type zss_comments.
data: lv_objkey type string.
select * from /sapsll/cuhd into table lt_cuhd.
loop at lt_cuhd  into ls_cuhd.
  CONCATENATE ls_cuhd-corder '%' into lv_objkey. " Example 'Mum%'
  select * from zss_comments into table lt_comments
            where objkey like lv_objkey
             AND guid_cuhd = ls_cuhd-guid_cuhd
              AND event_id <> ''.
endloop.
I want
New code should be...using all entries no loop required.
  *select * from zss_comments into table lt_comments
            where objkey like lv_objkey
             AND guid_cuhd = ls_cuhd-guid_cuhd
              AND event_id <> ''.*

why dont you add the object key also to  lt_cuhd and once you fetch the data to lt_cuhd loop it and add the '%'
when looping use field symbols so that you dont have to use  modify.
then use for all entries using lt_cuhd
i don't you can find a better way to add the % mark apart from looping but by this way only one select query will be done for
zss_comments
Thanks
Nafran

Similar Messages

  • Duplicate entries missing using for all entries in select query.

    Hi Gurus,
    Is there any way to avoid missing duplicate entries in an internal table if you use for all entries in select statement?
    Note : i am selecting two tables using non key fields and i have to aggregate the data. I want only 2 data fields and one amount field in my final internal table. I can add all the primary key fields into my internal table and collect my required fields in another table, but  I just want to know is there any other way to avoid missing duplicate entries without adding all the key fields?
    Regards,
    Raghavendra

    Hi,
    Just check what are the other possible fields in the table which may be having
    duplicate entries and make use of them in the selection accordingly.
    You may not miss any entries unless there is any restriction on them.
    You can better judge that in debugging mode while selecting data from that table.

  • For all entries in select query

    Hi Guys,
    I am fetching the BUKRS GJAHR BELNR and BUZEI from BSEG table, using for all entires of BSEG data, i am getting the data from BSID table.
    But in BSID table, i have duplicate records, those records i am not able to get.
    Could you please suggest me, is any wrong in my code. Please sugest is any other way to get the data.
    SELECT bukrs
             belnr
             gjahr
             buzei
             xref1 INTO TABLE it_bseg
             FROM bseg
             WHERE bukrs = p_bukrs
              AND  gjahr IN s_gjahr
              AND  xref1 IN s_xref1.
      SORT it_bseg BY bukrs gjahr belnr buzei.
      SELECT bukrs
             kunnr
             zuonr
             gjahr
             belnr
             budat
             bldat
             xblnr
             blart
             dmbtr
             shkzg INTO TABLE it_bsid
             FROM bsid
             FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_bseg
             WHERE bukrs = it_bseg-bukrs
               AND belnr = it_bseg-belnr
               AND gjahr = it_bseg-gjahr
               AND buzei = it_bseg-buzei
               AND blart IN r_blart.
    Thanks
    Gourisankar.

    Hi Sankar,
    if there are duplicates entries select statement will omit those records. try to include fields in the select statement which makes the selected record different from other atleast by one field.
    cheers!!

  • Usage of FOR ALL ENTRIES in SELECT query

    Hi All,
    While writing SELECT query using FOR ALL ENTRIES, in the WHERE condition can we use IN operator on a range table?
    Will this work out.
    Thanks,
    Anil Kumar

    HI,
    Yes you can use the in operator.
    SELECT *
      FROM MARC
      INTO TAB:E i_mARC
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN I_MARA
      WHERE MATNR EQ I_MARA_MATNR
        AND WERKS IN S_WERKS.

  • For all entries with 2 internal table

    HI experts.
    How to use  2 for all entries in a select statement.
    Below refer to my below code.
    select vbeln matnr lfimg vgbel posnr from lips into corresponding fields of table
      it_lips for all entries in  it_likp   where
                  vbeln = it_likp-vbeln and
                  matnr = it_mara-matnr.
    I want to add another for all entries it_mara.
    Please help me .Thanks in advanced.

    hi,
    it is possible....
    use this query...
    declare another internal table of the same type as it_lips.
    data : it_lips_final like it_lips.
    select vbeln matnr lfimg vgbel posnr from lips into corresponding fields of table
    it_lips for all entries in it_likp where
    vbeln = it_likp-vbeln .
    loop at it_lips.
      read table it_mara into it_mara with key matnr = it_lips-matnr.
      if sy-subrc = 0.
        append it_lips to it_lips_final.
      endif.
    endloop.
    refresh it_lips[].
    it_lips[] = it_lips_final[]
    what the above code does is selects all the entries of vbeln from lips and filters it in the loop reading it from mara checking for matnr value and finally
    all the entries according to your requirement is there in it_lips_final which we move it to it_lips again...
    this is something similar to writing a for all entries for 2 table.... but in another fashion
    Regards
    Siddarth

  • For All Entries with two tables

    Hi All,
             Can we use FOR ALL ENTRIES with two tables. for example
    SELECT * FROM MKPF INTO TABLE T_MKPF
             WHERE BUDAT IN S_BUDAT.
    SELECT * FROM MARA INTO TABLE T_MARA
             WHERE MTART IN S_MTART AND
                            MAKTL IN S_MAKTL.
    SELECT * FROM MSEG INTO TABLE T_MSEG
           FOR ALL ENTRIES IN  "T_MKPF AND T_MARA"
                  WHERE MBLNR EQ T_MKPF-MBLNR AND
                                 MATNR EQ T_MARA-MATNR.
    can we do it like this or any other way to do this plz tell. I waitting for your responce.
    Thanks
    Jitendra

    Hi,
    u cannot do like this....chek some documentation on it..
    1. duplicate rows are automatically removed
    2. if the itab used in the clause is empty , all the rows in the source table will be selected .
    3. performance degradation when using the clause on big tables.
    Say for example you have the following abap code:
    Select * from mara
    For all entries in itab
    Where matnr = itab-matnr.
    If the actual source of the material list (represented here by itab) is actually another database table, like:
    select matnr from mseg
    into corresponding fields of table itab
    where ….
    Then you could have used one sql statement that joins both tables.
    Select t1.*
    From mara t1, mseg t2
    Where t1.matnr = t2.matnr
    And T2…..
    So what are the drawbacks of using the "for all entires" instead of a join ?
    At run time , in order to fulfill the "for all entries " request, the abap engine will generate several sql statements (for detailed information on this refer to note 48230). Regardless of which method the engine uses (union all, "or" or "in" predicates) If the itab is bigger then a few records, the abap engine will break the itab into parts, and rerun an sql statement several times in a loop. This rerun of the same sql statement , each time with different host values, is a source of resource waste because it may lead to re-reading of data pages.
    returing to the above example , lets say that our itab contains 500 records and that the abap engine will be forced to run the following sql statement 50 times with a list of 10 values each time.
    Select * from mara
    Where matnr in ( ...)
    Db2 will be able to perform this sql statement cheaply all 50 times, using one of sap standard indexes that contain the matnr column. But in actuality, if you consider the wider picture (all 50 executions of the statement), you will see that some of the data pages, especially the root and middle-tire index pages have been re-read each execution.
    Even though db2 has mechanisms like buffer pools and sequential detection to try to minimize the i/o cost of such cases, those mechanisms can only minimize the actual i/o operations , not the cpu cost of re-reading them once they are in memory. Had you coded the join, db2 would have known that you actually need 500 rows from mara, it would have been able to use other access methods, and potentially consume less getpages i/o and cpu.
    In other words , when you use the "for all entries " clause instead of coding a join , you are depriving the database of important information needed to select the best access path for your application. Moreover, you are depriving your DBA of the same vital information. When the DBA monitors & tunes the system, he (or she) is less likely to recognize this kind of resource waste. The DBA will see a simple statement that uses an index , he is less likely to realize that this statement is executed in a loop unnecessarily.
    Beore using the "for all entries" clause and to evaluate the use of database views as a means to:
    a. simplify sql
    b. simplify abap code
    c. get around open sql limitations.
    check the links
    http://www.thespot4sap.com/articles/SAPABAPPerformanceTuning_ForAllEntries.asp
    The specified item was not found.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj

  • For all entries with inner join

    Hi All,
    I found some unusual thing.
    i have written INNERJOIN along with FOR ALL ENTRIES and also INNERJOIN in loop..endloop. I have tested both programs with around 1000 records, i found that INNERJOIN with FOR ALL ENTRIES is taking more time compared to the other one. As we know FOR ALL ENTRIES with SIMPLE SELECT takes less time compared to select in loop..endloop. Anybody tell me is there any specific reason for this
    thanks in advance
    rajavardhana reddy

    Have a look at this weblog by Dharmaveer Singh:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/2986 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    Sudha

  • What is the use of for all entries in select statement

    what is the use of for all entries in select statement

    hi,
    FOR ALL ENTRIES is an effective way of doing away with using JOIN on two tables.
    You can check the below code -
    SELECT BUKRS BELNR GJAHR AUGDT
    FROM BSEG
    INTO TABLE I_BSEG
    WHERE BUKRS = ....
    SELECT BUKRS BELNR BLART BLDAT
    FROM BKPF
    INTO TABLE I_BKPF
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN I_BSEG
    WHERE BUKRS = I_BSEG-BUKRS
    AND BELNR = I_BSEG-BELNR
    AND BLDAT IN SO_BLDAT.
    *******************************8
    look another example
    what is the use of FOR ALL ENTRIES
    1. INNER JOIN
    DBTAB1 <----
    > DBTAB2
    It is used to JOIN two DATABASE tables
    having some COMMON fields.
    2. Whereas
    For All Entries,
    DBTAB1 <----
    > ITAB1
    is not at all related to two DATABASE tables.
    It is related to INTERNAL table.
    3. If we want to fetch data
    from some DBTABLE1
    but we want to fetch
    for only some records
    which are contained in some internal table,
    then we use for alll entries.
    1. simple example of for all entries.
    2. NOTE THAT
    In for all entries,
    it is NOT necessary to use TWO DBTABLES.
    (as against JOIN)
    3. use this program (just copy paste)
    it will fetch data
    from T001
    FOR ONLY TWO COMPANIES (as mentioned in itab)
    4
    REPORT abc.
    DATA : BEGIN OF itab OCCURS 0,
    bukrs LIKE t001-bukrs,
    END OF itab.
    DATA : t001 LIKE TABLE OF t001 WITH HEADER LINE.
    itab-bukrs = '1000'.
    APPEND itab.
    itab-bukrs = '1100'.
    APPEND itab.
    SELECT * FROM t001
    INTO TABLE t001
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN itab
    WHERE bukrs = itab-bukrs.
    LOOP AT t001.
    WRITE :/ t001-bukrs.
    ENDLOOP.
    Hope this helps!
    Regards,
    Anver
    <i>if hlped pls mark points</i>

  • Select For all entries with multiple keys

    Dear Developers,
    im writing a program which reads the last the last mseg entry with bwart 101 and bwart 201 an writes it into different fields of a table. In dependance of the bwart the max-value of mkpf-budat should be moved into field wedat or wadat.
    At the moment i use this coding:
    loop at gt_daten assigning <fs_daten>.
        select distinct max( budat ) from wb2_v_mkpf_mseg2 into <fs_daten>-wedat
          where matnr_i = <fs_daten>-matnr
            and werks_i = <fs_daten>-werks
            and lgort_i = <fs_daten>-lgort
            and bwart_i = '101'.
        select distinct max( budat ) from wb2_v_mkpf_mseg2 into <fs_daten>-wadat
        where matnr_i = <fs_daten>-matnr
          and werks_i = <fs_daten>-werks
          and lgort_i = <fs_daten>-lgort
          and bwart_i = '201'.
      endloop.
    wb2_v_mkpf_mseg2 is a view combining mkpf an mseg by primary keys.
    Searching the internet i read, using FOR ALL ENTRIES should be prefered to selectstatements in loops.
    So i tried:
    *selectstatement
    select budat matnr_i werks_i lgort_i bwart_i from wb2_v_mkpf_mseg2 into table lt_mseg for all entries in gt_daten
        where matnr_i = gt_daten-matnr
          and werks_i = gt_daten-werks
          and lgort_i = gt_daten-lgort
          and ( bwart_i = '101' or bwart_i = '201' )
    *Substitute the MAX( )-Function
      sort lt_mseg descending by matnr werks lgort bwart budat.
      delete adjacent duplicates from lt_mseg comparing matnr werks lgort bwart.
    *Differ between wedat and wadat
      loop at gt_daten assigning <fs_daten>.
        loop at lt_mseg assigning <fs_mseg>
          where matnr = <fs_daten>-matnr
            and werks = <fs_daten>-werks
            and lgort = <fs_daten>-lgort.
          case <fs_mseg>-bwart.
            when '101'.
              <fs_daten>-wedat = <fs_mseg>-budat.
            when '201'.
              <fs_daten>-wadat = <fs_mseg>-budat.
          endcase.
        endloop.
    Even in the dev-system this takes twice the time of the "nested" selects.
    Imho this is because of the internal OR interpretation of the FOR ALL ENTRIES-statement and the size of the result.
    Can somebody give me a hint, how to tune this code?
    Select Inner join should be difficult because the target field differs, dependent of the value in bwart...
    Thanks in advance!

    I understand that you are trying to capture the maximum value of posting date MKPF-BUDAT for movement types 101 and 201 for each combination of material, plant and storage location.
    Few things, that makes the below coding more efficient at both application and database level and I confirmed this on an IDES sandbox
    1. Along with MKPF and MSEG, there is another table WBGT, in the view WB2_V_MKPF_MSEG join and also WBGT has select condition restrictions imposed on its fields. So if this restriction impacts your selection you may want to do a INNER JOIN of MSEG with MKPF only (with MSEG as leading table, as it has an active secondary index with MATNR, WERKS, LGORT and BWART ) and also there won't be overhead from the unnecessary join with WBGT table whose fields you are not using.
    2. The below SORT on lt_mseg will ensure that the record having greatest BUDAT will be at the top of all rows (least index) for each combination of MATNR, WERKS, LGORT and BWART.
    3. DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES will ensure that only the top row (having greatest BUDAT) remains in the table lt_mseg for each combination of MATNR, WERKS, LGORT and BWART. This will ensure that subsequent READs with BINARY SEARCH will always and efficiently read the row with maximum value of BUDAT for each unique combination of MATNR, WERKS, LGORT and BWART.
    4. The below logic will require more memory (even though it is more efficient performance wise) compared to direct SELECT with MAX for each MATNR, WERKS, LGORT and BWART in a LOOP the way you were doing before. So if the size of lt_mseg is causing memory issues, your logic with aggregate function MAX at database level will be your only option.
    So, I propose you revise your coding like below for most optimal results
    CHECK NOT gt_daten[] IS INITIAL.
    *selectstatement
    *SELECT budat matnr_i werks_i lgort_i bwart_i
    *  FROM wb2_v_mkpf_mseg2
    *  INTO TABLE lt_mseg
    *    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_daten
    *    WHERE matnr_i = gt_daten-matnr
    *      AND werks_i = gt_daten-werks
    *      AND lgort_i = gt_daten-lgort
    *      AND ( bwart_i = '101' OR bwart_i = '201' ).
    * The below SELECT is more economical than the one commented above
    SELECT mkpf~budat mseg~matnr mseg~werks mseg~lgort mseg~bwart
      FROM mseg INNER JOIN mkpf
        ON mseg~mblnr = mkpf~mblnr AND
           mseg~mjahr = mkpf~mjahr
        INTO TABLE lt_mseg
          FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_daten
            WHERE mseg~matnr = gt_daten-matnr
              AND mseg~werks = gt_daten-werks
              AND mseg~lgort = gt_daten-lgort
              AND ( mseg~bwart = '101' OR mseg~bwart = '201' ).
    *Substitute the MAX( )-Function
    SORT lt_mseg BY matnr werks lgort bwart DESCENDING budat.
    DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM lt_mseg COMPARING matnr werks lgort bwart.
    *Differ between wedat and wadat
    LOOP AT gt_daten ASSIGNING <fs_daten>.
      READ TABLE lt_mseg ASSIGNING <fs_mseg>
        WITH KEY matnr = <fs_daten>-matnr
                 werks = <fs_daten>-werks
                 lgort = <fs_daten>-lgort
                 bwart = '101' BINARY SEARCH.
      IF sy-subrc = 0.
        <fs_daten>-wedat = <fs_mseg>-budat.
      ENDIF.
      READ TABLE lt_mseg ASSIGNING <fs_mseg>
        WITH KEY matnr = <fs_daten>-matnr
                 werks = <fs_daten>-werks
                 lgort = <fs_daten>-lgort
                 bwart = '201' BINARY SEARCH.
      IF sy-subrc = 0.
        <fs_daten>-wadat = <fs_mseg>-budat.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.

  • Inner join and select for all entries with respect to performance

    Hi Friends,
    I just want to know which is more efficient with respect to performance the Inner join or select for all entries?which is more efficient? and how? can you explain me in detail ?
    Regards,
    Dinesh

    INNER JOIN->
    The data that can be selected with a view depends primarily on whether the view implements an inner join or an outer join. With an inner join, you only get the records of the cross-product for which there is an entry in all tables used in the view. With an outer join, records are also selected for which there is no entry in some of the tables used in the view.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/cf/21ec77446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
    FOR ALL ENTRIES->
    Outer join can be created using this addition to the where clause in a select statement. It speeds up the performance tremendously, but the cons of using this variation are listed below
    Duplicates are automatically removed from the resulting data set. Hence care should be taken that the unique key of the detail line items should be given in the select statement.
    If the table on which the For All Entries IN clause is based is empty, all rows are selected into the destination table. Hence it is advisable to check before-hand that the first table is not empty.
    If the table on which the For All Entries IN clause is based is very large, the performance will go down instead of improving. Hence attempt should be made to keep the table size to a moderate level.
    Not Recommended
    Loop at int_cntry.
    Select single * from zfligh into int_fligh
    where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.
    Append int_fligh.
    Endloop.
    Recommended
    Select * from zfligh appending table int_fligh
    For all entries in int_cntry
    Where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.

  • Problem with for all entries in select querry

    hi,
    Hi,
    I am using select queery like this
    SELECT  version  COUNT( * ) 
    from ztbi_default_va4
    INTO  CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE   lit_new 
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lit_new1
    WHERE network = lit_new1-network GROUP BY version.
    this is not working showing error as:
    The addition "FOR ALL ENTRIES" excludes all aggregate functions with          
    the exception of "COUNT( * )" as the single element of the SELECT     clause.     
    I am using only count(*) ,not using othes like max,min etc,,,,,,,,,
    please suggest any missing in syntax,,,,attach relavant code using count(*) with for all entreis
    any help appriciated,,,,,
    Thanks in advance,,,,

    Hi,
    Try this -
    TYPES: begin of t_data,
                 version TYPE version,
                 count    type i,
                 end of t_data.
    DATA: i_data TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF t_data,
               wa_data TYPE t_data.
    DATA: l_version TYPE version,
               l_count TYPE i.
    SELECT  version  COUNT( * ) 
    from ztbi_default_va4
    INTO  CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE   lit_new 
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lit_new1
    WHERE network = lit_new1-network.
    SORT lit_new.
    LOOP AT lit_new INTO lwa_new.
        IF lwa_new EQ l_version.
          l_count = l_count + 1.
        ELSE.
          wa_data-version = l_version.
          wa_data-count = l_count + 1.
          APPEND wa_data TO i_data.
          CLEAR: wa_data.
          CLEAR: l_count.
        ENDIF.
        l_version = lwa_new-version.
        CLEAR: lwa_new.
    I hope this will do.
    Make any necessary changes.
    Regards,
    Harsh Bansal

  • Inner join and select for all entries with respect to performance in SAP

    Hi Friends,
    I just want to know which is more efficient with respect to performance the Inner join or select for all entries?which is more efficient?
    Regards,
    Dinesh

    I did some testing a while ago and found that a JOIN is usually a bit more efficient than FOR ALL ENTRIES. This wasn't always the case though, so the best thing to do is to write it both ways and see which is faster.
    Rob

  • 2 for all entries with different condition

    Hi
    i have an internal 2 internal table which have the following field
    ITAB1 : Stock category, plant, storage location , SKU code   (those value are given though flat file)
    ITAB2 : Grid value , meterial NO, SKU code  (those values are determine through a FM where we export the SKU code and it will retreive the matnr and grid value in an ITAB2)
    I have to do select FROM database MCHB
    with the condition Grid value , material NO , Stock category, plant, storage location
    Note that gris value and matnr are found in two different internal table i was thinking of doing for all entries but
    is it possible to do for all entries from 2 internal table
    SELECT FOROM MCHB
    FOR ALL ENTRIES in ITAB1
    FOR ALL ENTRIES in ITAB2
    WHERE
    grid value = itab2-gridvalue
    matnr = itab2-matnr
    stock cat = itab1-stock cat
    plant = itab1-plant
    storage location = itab1-storage location
    Please help on how to tackle this?

    Hi,
    You have to create a new third internal table with the fields matnr, grid value, stock category, plant and storage location....
    Then process the itab1 and get the process the itab2 for the corresponding SKU Code (which I believe is the common field for both of the internal tables) and then populate the third internal table itab3...
    Then use the itab3 for the FOR ALL ENTRIES.
    Thanks
    Naren

  • For all entries with large sets

    Hello All,
    Does for all entries have restriction that the itab should not exceed the maximum entries? Look at code below:
      select pernr raufpl raplzl catshours
             from catsdb
             into corresponding fields of table lit_catshrs
             for all entries in itab
             where pernr = itab-pernr
               and status in ('10', '20', '30')
               and workdate in s_date.
    if itab have 7000 entries in production system, will the select statement cause a short dump such as DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_RSQL?
    Thanks,
    Alex M

    Hi,
    check the sequence of the fields in the internal table lit_catshrs
    Because RSQL error occurs because of this.
    and Whenevr you use for all entries of some Internal Table it is a must to check that
    IF not ITAB[] Is initial.
    < write the select>
    endif.
    Other performance related thing w.r.t to ABAP are
    1) Dont use nested seelct statement
    2) If possible use for all entries in addition
    3) In the where addition make sure you give all the primary key
    4) Use Index for the selection criteria.
    5) You can also use inner joins
    6) You can try to put the data from the first select statement into an Itab and then in order to select the data from the second table use for all entries in.
    7) Use the runtime analysis SE30 and SQL Trace (ST05) to identify the performance and also to identify where the load is heavy, so that you can change the code accordingly
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5d0db4c9-0e01-0010-b68f-9b1408d5f234
    reward if useful
    regards,
    Anji

  • 'FOR ALL ENTRIES' in SELECT statements

    Hi,
    I got a doubt in working of the 'FOR ALL ENTRIES' option in the SELECT statement. Here is my scenarion.
    Table A - Document Header Level (Key: Doc Number)
    Internal Table B - Document Item level (Keys: Doc num and Doc Item).
    So, for each record in Table A, table B will have multiple records.
    In this situation, how the below SELECT will work.
    SELECT <field names> INTO <some internal table>
                         FROM A
                         FOR ALL ENTRIES in B
                         WHERE doc_num = B-doc_num.
    Will the above SELECT result in duplicate records or not?
    (I tested it and found that it doesn't! I was lil surprised and wanted to confirm that)
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sree

    Hi,
    For all entries option basically sorts out the entries in the internal tbale based on the where condition and thus it only picks the unique entries based on the list.
    so indeed your table A is a header one so it will give you only single value. if you go by the reverse way where in look for B for all entries in A it will give you multiple values as table B has multiple values for each value in A.
    Regards,
    Jagath

Maybe you are looking for