Warehouse Task NOT Getting Saved, getting dump "Posting_illegal_statement"

HI All,
While trying to "create + save" warehouse task for the inbound delivery (in EWM 9.1) , warehouse task numbers are getting generated but not saved. I am getting an update error saying "update was terminated for author ___" . On checking the dump in ST22, it mentions the error as "POSTING_ILLEGAL_STATEMENT" ,ABAP Program "SAPLSYDB" and application component "BC-DB-DBI".
Please help.

Hi Jayson,
The error is related to the ABAP coding of the particular program. The program related to sales and billing.
The error you get must be the user own output screen.
Please refer to the SAP Note for further analysis and solution.
http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1472777

Similar Messages

BPM task not getting created

I have modelled a BPM process and attached Webdynpro UI's to its human activities.
I am able to start the process from the Process Repository, but the tasks are not getting visible in the Uniiversal Worklist of the Task Principle Owner.
When I'm logging on with administrator id, and going to Manage Processes screen, I'm seeing the active task correctly highlighted.
Also, when I'm logging on with administrator id, and going to Manage Tasks screen, I'm not seeing any tasks being created.
What may be the problem?

There was a problem with setting the Locale in the BPM configuration wizard. After fixing it, the first human activity is getting created and task is assigned. When I'm completing the first human activity and submitting the form, task is not getting assigned to the user/principle owner of the second human activity.
When I open Manage Process, and see the history, I see the process status as Suspended and the following log:
15-Jun-2010 15:57:49 Task completed Task completed by BPEMUser, Operator Human interaction
15-Jun-2010 15:56:44 Event notification cannot be sent Event notification could not be sent to recipients <mail id removed> for task instance ID 35e69fcb-788e-11df-c7cd-02004c4f4f50. Problem: Cannot send e-mail because the e-mail session cannot be retrieved Human interaction
15-Jun-2010 15:56:43 Task created Task created Human interaction
No task created for second human activity.
What may be the problem now?

BPM 7.2 Tasks not getting assigned to user UWL

Hi All,
I am on CE7.2 and downlaoded NWDS for the same.
I follwed Donka Dimitrova's article to create a BPM process (name, age) application. I had earlier tried it on CE 7.11 and it worked fine. But now on CE7.2 when I initiate the process from /nwa, the first user (user assigned to the very first task) doesnt get it in UWL. I .looked into nwa and It seems like the tasks itself are not getting created because there are no tasks under "Manage Tasks" option.
Is there some configuration missing.
Note: I have assigned tasks to users in the Process in IDE and EP-BPEM UWL configuration is done.
Prem

hi,
have you run the configuration wizard?
http://yourhost:port/nwa/cfg-wizard
there is a task for BPM. just execute it.
if you have already run the wizard, you can go to following place to check and make further change if required.
http://yourhost:port/nwa/sys-config
select "Applications" tab
put "bpembaseear" in the name filter, select that application in the result table
you will see the properties tab
if your locale is not there, you can fix now.
Best regards,
John

Tasks not getting executed as per schedule

Hello Gurus,
my query is with respect to tuxedo 7.1 / singleview 4.02.17.01.
I am facing some new issues these days with singleview.
Whenever we submit any task in singleview, it is not getting executed on its scheduled time.
this has been happening from past few days.
worstly,nothing has been found in logs.
Interestingly, twice it happened that i took down the application & after the app was brought up,these "NOT" executed tasks started automatically.
Why this could be happening?
unix file " stdout" <standard output> is getting written heavily & reaching its MAX size ( 2 GB) in less than 24 hrs.
i have changed its schedule as of now,but has it got anything with above problem?
Finally,i have generated a new "ubbconfig" for tuxedo which will help in maximising billing performance.
reason for this is in recent times i have observed that memory usage has increased .so this "ubb" contains maximum billing servers & rest minimum.if you have any idea on this,pls let me know.
your suggestions & corrections are welcome.
Thanks & Regards
Abhijeet K

Some follow up questions:
- How did you migrate (dsmig ldif or binary import)
- Did the accounts in .x have any custom password policies set?
For a "new" and a migrated entry, can you check if a passwordpolicysubentry is configured?
(search as directory manager and fetch the attribute)

Enable Task not getting triggered

Hi experts
In my Process Definition, I have a task say Task1 which has task effect as "Enable User or Access to Application" and say Task2 has task effect as "Disable User or Access to Application".
Here when I click on enable checkbox under Resource Profile, my task Task1 gets executed and enables the Application. The same will happens for Disable under same resource profile.
Also when I Disable the user at user profile level, the task Task2 gets executed and sets the RO status as Disabled. But my problem is that when I click on Enable at user profile level, the RO which is already disabled is not getting enabled. I can see Task1 task is not getting triggered.
Any early responses are appreciated.
Thanks in Advance

Look at the following System Configuration property:
XL.EnableDisabledResources
This should be set to TRUE. I think your environment must be showing it as the other way.
If that is not the case then are you sure that your user is getting Enabled with that action. Let us know, although I think that this should not occur.
Thanks
Sunny

BW: Not getting Dump For Program error in Process Chain

I have one issue regarding Master data loading issue in BW(3.5).
My business flow like we have received data from server A and Server A extract data from Server B and
Server B which is extract data from source(R/3).
Flow like this R/3-->Server B-->Server A(ETL) -
> My Server.
We have a mater data process chain and that chain we have have the source system Server A but in the process chain one process is there which is fethces data like global transport e.g UOM,factory calender etc through Custom program directly from Server B.
Oneday what happened On that process the process chain Yellow since more than 16 hrs.Once nextday process chain trigger the process chain runs sucessfuly.
But lastdays process chain paticular process stills remains yellow?
We are not getting any dumps and even if from Server A there is no logs then anyone could please tell me what is reason and how to solve it.
Note: it will be helpful for me if any one know how to check dump for program errors in Process chain as narated issue.

Guys, I am also facing the same issue.
When DTP is completed successfully, it has the job log blow :
Job started
Step 001 started (program RSPROCESS, variant &0000000391261, user ID BWREMOTE)
Performing check and potential update for status control table
Status 'Executable' (user BWREMOTE)
Status 'Active' (user BWREMOTE)
Program RSBATCH_EXECUTE_PROZESS successfully scheduled as job BIDTPR_335754_1 with ID 06532200
Job finished
When it fails or remain yelllow for long time and then turn into red.
Job started
Step 001 started (program RSPROCESS, variant &0000000391306, user ID BWREMOTE)
Performing check and potential update for status control table
Status 'Executable' (user BWREMOTE)
Status 'Active' (user BWREMOTE)
EXTRACTION OF DATAPACKAGE 000001
EXTRACTION OF DATAPACKAGE 000002
Job finished
The question is, why the program RSBATCH_EXECUTE_PROZESS is not scheduled. Is it because there is no free resource? Or poor response from SAP ECC?
Finally what does "EXTRACTION OF DATAPACKAGE 000001" mean? Its not scheduled?
Regards
MultiABAP
Edited by: MultiABAP on Oct 6, 2010 10:32 AM

Warehouse task not being created : Handling unit was not locked

Hi,
I am trying to create a warehouse task w.r.t to an o/b delivery in EWM. While doing so when I try and create the Warehouse task from the Warehouse Req an error comes up : Warehouse Task cannot be created. Handling unit was not locked.
What is the resolution for this? is there some way we can lock the individual handling units?
Arup

Hi,
I am not using HUM at the warehouse level. The storage type used is 0010 (High Rack Storage) and it is defined to behave as a standard storage type.
Arup

Provisioning tasks not getting initiated when done in bulk

Hello IDM Gurus,
Needed your help with an issue we're currently facing; We're having an odd problem with provisioning/deprovisioning to our ABAP repositories. For each repository we are using the Add Member/ Remove Member tasks; for all repositoies, both the Add Member and Remove Member event tasks trigger a similar task that basically through the means of a script checks to see whether a user already has privileges within the target repository or not, then accordingly either adds the new privilege to the existing account or creates a new account and adds the new privilege; after the initial check is made, the decision on whether to add the privilege to the existing account or create a new one and add the privilege is done through a uProvision call from the script itself to the appropriate provisioning task for the specific repository in question; the check for whether the account exists or not is done within the Provisioning task itself.The same process is followed for deprovisioning as well. An example of how this would work is:
JohnDoe has no account in Repository A;
Privilege X (associated with repository A) is added to his account;
The script is called and a check is made; the provisioning task for repository A is called;
The provisioning task checks and sees that JohnDoe doesn't have an account in repository A, so an account is created and Privilege X is added to the new account.
After this, we add two new privileges Y and Z(both associated with repository A) to JohnDoe
The script is called and a check is made; the provisioning task for repository A is called;
The provisioning task checks and sees that JohnDoe has an account in repository A, so the two new privileges are simply added to the existing account.
This all works perfectly as long as we only work with one repository at a time; i.e. only add and remove privileges from one repository at a time; make all changes related to privileges for one repository; hit update; then try doing the same again for another repository. Whenever we make multiple changes related to multiple repositories, random things start happening, some changes go across in full, but some just don't; there's no logic in why certain changes happen and certain don't.
Does this have something to do with working with just one dispatcher? is it not able to handle that many changes at once? I tried using privilege/assignment grouping for each repository, grouping it by repository name as it should inherently group add and remove task, but even that didn't have any effect. Privilege changes were still going missing.
Any suggestions / ideas to rectify this behavior?
I would appreciate any help with the issue! Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Sandeep

Hey Matt,
Thanks a lot for your quick response! I tried changing the number of runtime engines from the default of 1 to 4 but it had no effect; I added 3 roles for 3 systems but only one system got an account provisioned to it; is 4 not enough? should I try a higher value? is the uProvision script not supposed to be called or used in that fashion for multiple simultaneous calls?
If looking at the backend to resolve this, would I need to only be looking at the MXP_PROVISION and MXP_AUDIT tables?
Thanks a lot in advance!
Best regards,
Sandeep

Task activities not getting generated properly in BPEL

I am using the Jdev 11g TP3 (from OTN). Installation went through fine. However I observed a interesting issue with HumanTask/BPEL and I was wondering if someone faced similar such problems before, if so, how to rectify the issue. Here is the description of the issue:
1. Created a Empty SOA composite project
2. Dragged and dropped BPEL Process in the component palette. Designed a Asynchronous process.
3. Dragged and dropped a HumanTask. Did not expose as an composite. Designed a single approver workflow. In the project schema, choose the schema from BPEL input.
4. Wired BPEL to HumanTAsk
5. In the BPEL flow, I dragged the HumanTask to the flow. Everything appears to be correct. I clicked on "Ok" after associating with BPEL variable.
Now when I examine the BPEL flow, a scope before the BPEL switch is empty. There are no BPEL activities generated. This is a very simple case of BPEL and HumanTask and I am not sure as to why the tasks not getting generated properly in BPEL flow.
Has anyone experienced this issue or any ideas as to why this could happen?

After going through the exercise several times, I finally found out the reason as to why the BPEL activities are not getting generated. In the Human task form for the title, since it is a fixed string in my case I put something like the one given below:
Title : "APPROVE ORDER"
When you have fixed string within double quotes it does not generate BPEL activities correctly. You can try and u will see the problem.
My real question is should not throw proper error message when you try to drag and drop the HumanTask to BPEL flow.

Iam getting Dump Define Navigational Link FROMCORPACCOUNTSALESAREASEF for source view salesAreasEdit in component BP_SALES

Iam getting Dumep ,iam upgrading EHP4. Please team tell me any notes related to this-
Define Navigational Link FROMCORPACCOUNTSALESAREASEF for source view salesAreasEdit in component BP_SALES.

Hi Kalpana,
Do we need to comment below highlighted code to resolve this issue?.
because if i skip this code while debugging, i'm not getting dump.
Please let me know.
METHOD ip_fromcorpaccountsalesareasef.
   me->view_manager->navigate( source_rep_view = me->rep_view
                             data_collection = iv_collection
                             outbound_plug   = 'FROMCORPACCOUNTSALESAREASEF' ).
ENDMETHOD.
Regards,
Nagaraju

Warehouse task in status "b" (waiting) will not be activated

Dear experts,
in the following situation i want to execute a stock removal and the following problem appears:
When the warehouse task for stock removal will be created, the layout-oriented storage process control creates two warehouse tasks:
The first warehouse task is MFS relevant and will be automatically confirmed by the resource (Telegramtraffic).
The second warehouse task (not MFS relevant) stays in status "b" and can´t be activated. But it has to be confirmed manuelly by the user and because of status "b" it´s not possible for the user to confirm the warehouse task.
Why will the second warehouse task not be activated? Do someone know any hints to clear this situation?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Rodrigo

Hi,
the configuration of the first storage type is:
The second type is configurated:
The third is:
The first warehouse task is from AKL1 to EAR1 and it works.
The second warehouse task is from EAR1 to EARE and here is the problem.
Best regards,
Rodrigo!

Automatic Warehouse task

In an Inbound delivery if we have same product and batch in multiple line items, Automatic Warehouse Tasks are getting created for rest of the HU after creating WT for one HU
Inbound Process--> Receive HU via ASN. Then Select a HU and perform Unload, GR and Create WT. After that if you see the List if HU, WH task gets created for rest of the HU automatically, This auto WH task gets created even without/before GR.
I have tested this by removing conditions of PPF ( Automatic WH task for Putaway) , No good
Any idea? Note??
Thanks

Hi sabyasachi
WT can be created before GR is normal in EWM.
No WT creating automatically.
when you go to wt creation screen check does all HU are getting selected in HU task tab. If yes then deselect and try to create as you need ?
Also check action profile. This should not happen if you only do activity for one.
Regards
Suraj

I received an Keynote update notice on my Mac Air. I updated and now can not get into my saved keynote docs. I am being asked to upgrade again and purchase the upgrade. Anyone else having this issue?

I received an Keynote update notice on my Mac Air. I updated and now can not get into my saved keynote docs. I am being asked to upgrade again and purchase the upgrade. Anyone else having this issue?

Try this repair, ensure you complete all the tasks and in the order shown:
1 delete all the iWork applications if you have them, not just Keynote, use Appcleaner from Mac Update to           do this, its freeware
2 restart the Mac;   Apple menu > restart
3 immediately after the start chime, press the shift key until you see the Apple symbol.
         let it fully boot up, it will take longer as the OS is repairing the drive
4 when fully booted, go to Applications > Utilities > Disc Utility; click on the boot drive then First Aid tab and           click repair disc permissions
5 when complete, restart the Mac normally
6 install Keynote from the Mac App Store
Please report back to let us know if this helped.

While Creation Of SaleOrder Char Values are not getting saved.(V C)

Hi SAP gurus,
One of my client can able to create a saleorder but when we go and see in VA03 Display mode,we found Charactrestic values getting miised out.What could be the probale reasons.
Note: I Have stimulate the required combination as per my client requirement in CU50,here i can able to indentify the Green Sign,but While Creation Of SaleOrder Char Values are not getting saved.
Awaiting for your valuable reply.
Cheers,
Kumar.S

Kumar ,
If you assign values in classification view or configuration profile they will become default for the product, and it willnot be changed in sales order.
another thing if the item category is incorrect you will not get the configuration pop up at all .
problem what i understand from your thred is at the time of sales ordeer creation there is some inconsistances in the configuration , may be some condition is not fullfilling.
If in CU50 the result shown are error free, same configuration should owrk properly in sales configuration process, please again try to create it in sales order with same value assignment also check all the messages.
see the result of configuration before saving the sales order , i hoep it will work for you.
I am assuming all the things from SD are properly configured ie item catageory, varient pricing etc.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Ritesh

Reg:tasks are not getting displayed in the uwl mss for particular user

hi all
Tasks are not getting updated in the MSS under tasks tab for particular user in EP.can any one please share their exp and knowledge on this how to reslove it.
Thanks in advance.
Deepika

Hi Sateesh,
This message will appear if either the background jobs are not scheduled, or UWL cannot tell that the background jobs are scheduled. The message no longer appears once you ensure the background jobs are scheduled to run via the user id UWL_SERVICE and that user is mapped to my portal user ID UWL_SERVICE.
Kai

Warehouse Task NOT Getting Saved, getting dump "Posting_illegal_statement"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for