Warehouse

I have a s.loc assigned to inventory mgmt..I need to assign a warehouse to it.What implications should be taken into account for extending to WM?

Hello,
Before you implement the application component Warehouse Management you must first define the structure, that is, the physical structure, of your warehouse or warehouse complex and depict it in the system.
Please check the link below which says how to assign a store loc. to a warehouse.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/en/7e/2436cd6b744ddc867ed6ffbb015869/content.htm
Regards,
Alok Tiwari

Similar Messages

Error while defining a warehouse as Bonded Store

Hi All
I am getting one error while defining a OPM Warehouse as Bonded Store in OPM Inventory Module under Warehouse Attributes.
The error is 'APP-JA-460778: This Warehouse does not have a Parent Organization defined in Oracle Financials'. Can any one tell me where i missed the setup part of defining a parent organization in Financial Module. We are on OPM 11i EBS.
Thanks in advance
Prem.

I think you are using India Localization. Sorry, I don't have any knowledge in that area.
I got following information about how to setup Organization/Warehouse. And it says that any deviation from this may result in error. Check if you are following all the steps required for defining warehouse and organization.
Please ensure that the following setups are done exactly as mentioned below:
1) Create an OPM organization in OPM System Administration using OPM Organization Screen eg. ‘PM1’
2) Create a Location using ‘HR Locations’ form with the same name as the OPM Organization (eg. PM1)
3) Create an Inventory Organization using the form ‘HR Organizations’ with the same Organization Code as the OPM organization Code created in step 1. (Additional Identification details of the Organization could be given after a colon (:) in the Organization Name – Eg. ‘PM1: Vision Process India Mumbai’). Make this Inventory Organization as ‘Process Enabled’ and in the ‘Process Organization’ field, refer to the OPM Organization. Attach the HR Location created in step 2 to this Inventory Organization.
4) On saving the Inventory Organization record, the system shall automatically create a Warehouse with the same name in OPM under the OPM organization. (eg.PM1)
5) Query the Location ‘PM1’ and attach the Inventory Organization ‘PM1’ to it.
6) Go to Organization Additional info in OPM System Admin – Create a record for ‘PM1’.
Enter the EC Code for this Organization, as this is the Excise Licensed Organization. After saving
the record here, an automatic entry is created in India Local Inventory – Organization Additional Information for the Inventory Organization.
7) Go to India Local Inventory Org Additional Info and query for this Organization (it will be visible without location). DO NOT mark this as Master Organization.
8) Add another record for the Organization with Location (eg. PM1)
9) Check the 'Master Org' flag for this combination of Organization and Location.
B: Warehouse :
1) Create an Inventory Organization in India Local Inventory corresponding to the Warehouse in OPM (eg. ‘WSH’). Make this as ‘Process Enabled’ and give the ‘Process Organization’ as the
OPM Organization created earlier (PM1), which is the Process Organization this Warehouse is going to report to.
2) Create location (WSH-With the same name as the Warehouse Code) in India Local Inventory and attach it to organization ‘WSH’ in India Local Inventory
3) System automatically creates Warehouse ‘WSH’ in OPM under the OPM organization (PM1)
4) Using the ‘Warehouse Attributes’ form, classify this Warehouse as Bonded/Trading/OSP
5) Go to India Local Inventory Organization Additional Information form and create a record ‘WSH’ giving the Master Organization as ‘PM1’ (actually this is referring to the combination of PM1 with Location
PM1 as Master Organization) . Add another record for the same Org ‘WSH’ with Location ‘WSH’
with Master Organization as ‘PM1’. Please ensure that the EC Code is exactly same as the Master Organization.
6) Optionally ensure that in the Register Priorities, highest priority (1) is set against PLA.
7) Optionally ensure that Allow Negative PLA Balance Flag is checked.
Also make sure that all objects (triggers, packages etc) that are related to localization are valid.

How long does it take for the warehouse to show a phone as recieved so I can pay my final bill? I would like to sign up for Verizon again as I am very unsatisfied with my new company but cannot until this is resolved.

I recently switched to another competitor but would actually like to start from scratch with Verizon but cannot do so because they cannot locate my devices I mailed in to their warehouse. I switched my whole family's accounts, 3 phones and 1 mobile hotspot, to a competitor to get a cheaper rate and unlimited data but I have not been happy with their service and would like to switch back. The problem is when switching the first time I was told by a Verizon chat rep that I could send my Edge devices back in and would get credit for them and stop my edge payments which was not the way I know now it is supposed to work. After a couple of phone calls a supervisor looked at my online chat transcript and realized that I was correct and the rep had told me incorrectly that they would take my edge phones back and give me credit for them and I could close my account by only paying the early termination fees. She sent me two envelopes to send my two edge phones back in and said they would credit on my account and stop the monthly billing for them once they were received. I called a couple of weeks ago after being charged 24.99 for the both of them again for the month after my account was stopped. They said that they had not received my phones and I should have noted the tracking number from the labels the rep sent me so they could track them. I tried to find the tracking numbers but couldn't so I got back on live chat and asked them to resend me the letter from the supervisor rep as well as resending the labels and he said they could that and it should be 7-10 business days. It has now been over two weeks and I have not received the resent letter or labels so I cannot give them the tracking number to prove I sent my phones back to them. I have also researched the facility I was asked to send these phones back to and it seems this is a pretty common Verizon trick of making you prove you sent the phones and not giving you any access to the tracking numbers. I just want to pay my ETF's and close out my original account so I can start over fresh with Verizon but now I am losing faith in doing that as this is making me wonder if they are the type of company I want to deal with. Please someone who may have dealt with this help me restore my faith in Verizon and give me an idea of what to do next.

How recently did you switch? If it's less than 60 days, then Verizon simply reinstates your previous account. The fact that you were on the EDGE plan and mailed the devices back, and they apparently are somewhere in the system, could cause complications, and it might just work out that you just go back on the same plan and they set you up with the same devices. I'm not sure how it will go - but since you are still being billed for the devices...

Error while creating warehouse task

Hello,
While creating a Warehouse Task, i am getting following errors. Kindly suggest what settings need to be done to successfully create a warehouse Task.
First Error:
Could not determine ERP stock data for: AYYB 0000000101 F1
Message no. /SCWM/ERPINTEGRATION105
Diagnosis
The transaction you executed causes a stock posting in the ERP system. For this, the system must determine the stock data for the ERP system (such as material, plant, storage location) from the EWM data (such as material, party entitled to dispose, stock type).
For the following field, the system could not determine any ERP data: AYYB 0000000101 F1
Second Error
System could not determine source storage bin
Message no. /SCWM/L3008
Diagnosis
The system was not able to determine a source storage bin for this product.
This problem can be caused for several reasons:
1. The product no longer exists in your warehouse.
2. The product is in your warehouse, but currently cannot be reached by the system (for example, the product is just being transferred by one of the conveyor machines).
3. The product is in your warehouse, but not in the storage type and storage areas that are defined in your system for the product search.
Procedure
Check to see if the product really exists in your warehouse.
If the reason for the error is the third one mentioned above, contact your system administrator.
Regards,
Raju
Edited by: Jonnakuti Raju on Apr 27, 2011 5:49 PM

verify the following settings:
1. mapping of ECC plant and storage location and logical system number with the appropriate availability group code since this links the stock types in EWM to ECC org elements (SPRO -> EWM -> Interfaces -> ERP Integration -> Goods movement)
2. ensure the availability group configuration is correct (SPRO -> EWM -> GR Process -> Configure availability group for putaway) - check all applicable nodes in this configuration since the availability group code is assigned in the pertinent storage types

Warehouse as a plant

Dear SAP Gurus,
My client is having Warehouse near Port, where they store the import material and manage the stocks ?
Should we define that warehouse as Plant in the enterprize structure?
Also can we consider the stocks maintained at this warehouse , in the MRP run of our parent plant?
Also while carrying out the mrp run which stock is taken in to consideration, any criteria for the same??
Thanks and regards,
Monica

Hi Monica
Is your client using WM management? If yes then you need not require to crdeate Warehouse as plant.but if WM is not active then you can define this plant.
regards

Best practice of metadata table in data warehouse environment ?

Hi guru's,
In datawarehouse, we have 1. Stage schema 2. DWH(Data warehouse reporting schema). In stageing we have about 300 source tables. In DWH schema, we are creating the tables which are only required from reporting prespective . some of the tables in stageing schema, have been created in DWH schema as well with different table name and column names. The naming convention for these same tables and columns in DWH schema is more based on business names.
In order to keep track of these tables we are creating metadata table in DWH schema say for example
Stage                DWH_schema
Table_1             Table_A
Table_2             Table_b
Table_3             Table_c
Table_4              Table_DMy question is how do we handle the column names in each of these tables. The stage_1, stage_2 and stage_3 column names have been renamed in DWH_schema which are part of Table_A, Table_B, Table_c.
As said earlier, we have about 300 tables in stage and may be around 200 tables in DWH schema. Lot of the column names have been renamed in DWH schema from stage tables. In some of the tables we have 200 column's
so my concern is how do we handle the column names in metadata table ? Do we need to keep only table names in metadata table not column names ?
Any idea will be greatly appriciated.
Thanks!

hi
seems quite a buzzing question.
In our project we designed a hub and spoke like architecture.
Thus we have 3 layer, L0 is the one closest to the source and L0 table's name are linked to the corresponding sources names by mean of naming standard (like tabA EXT_tabA tabA_OK1 so on based on implementation of load procedures).
At L1 we have the ODS , normalized model , we use business names for table there and standard names for temporary structures and artifacts
Both L0 an L1 keep source's column names as general rule, new columns like calculated one are business driven and metadata are standard driven.
Datamodeler fits perfect for modelling L1 purpose.
L2 is the dimensional schema business names take place for tables and columns eventually rewritten at presentation layer ( front end tool )
hope this helps D.

Query Help with Item Master & Warehouse Code

Forum,
I would like help with a query to identify any items within a database where a particular warehouse code does NOT exist against it. At present I have the following:
select T0.ItemCode, T1.WhsCode from OITM T0
INNER JOIN OITW T1 on T0.ItemCode = T1.ItemCode
where T0.ItemCode NOT IN ('WHS1')
This is returning all other instance and not just a list of item codes where 'WHS1' is missing from within the 'Stock Data' tab.
Thanks,
Sarah

Hi Sarah...
Try This
SELECT T0.ItemCode, T0.ItemName, T1.WhsCode
FROM OITM T0 INNER JOIN OITW T1 ON T0.ItemCode = T1.ItemCode
WHERE T1.WhsCode not in ( 'WHS1')
Regards
Kennedy

Can not see warehouse management data screens for material while extending.

I want to extend material for warehouse managment views.I can not see these views for the material in MM01.Looks like this is some thing to do with material type configuration.Can some one assist me how to do this?

1)Check whether the material exist for that plant and storage location which is assigned to warehouse number .
spro->enterprise structure->assignment->logistic execution->assign warehouse number to plant/sloc.
2) Check in OMS2 tcode in the material type setting WM view is selected.

Benefits of SAP Business Warehouse Reporting compared with the Query-tools?

Hello experts,
I've been creating reports with SAP Query tools, but been faced with few problems. First of all, there are restricted possibilities in terms of joining tables, and thus I cannot include all the data required for the report.
One solution for this would have been to create separate queries and join the data together in Excel. The problem with this is that there exists no common field that would make sense as for a selection criterion. If the selection criterion is different in different queries, there is the danger of combining false data together, which would eventually result with distorted data.
So I was wondering, could anyone briefly tell me if SAP Business Warehouse reporting would solve these problems? And what other benefits would it provide compared with the SAP Query? I'd urgently need to know if it would be a beneficial investment for the company, since I haven't found solutions for the problems occurred in the creation of reports.
Thank you in advance for you help!
Maria

The answers are yes - and thousands of companies have gone down this route
Puttingin BW is a strategic aim of the comapny and not to be thought about and discussed in a BI forum such as this
The costs of implementation and hardware will no doubt make your eyes water.
To be quite honest SAP BI is a "no brainer" as most of the new e-SOA and new R3 modules reply on BW for their reporting needs

How can I update accounts by Warehouse in Item Master Data, Inventory Data

I have all of my inventory items set to G/L Accounts by Item Group and I need to change it to Item Level. I know I can do this with DTW and Choose update using the oItems >> Items template. I also need to modify the Stock account (inventory account) for one warehouse on all items. It is the second part I can't get to work. I get a message that "Field Cannot be Updated(ODBC - 1029)Application-Defined or object-defined error65171.
Thanks,
Don

Hi,
If you have made already the transactions you cannot update the G/L method.
Secondly if you have set G/L by Item level then you need to define the inventory accounts for all the items in your template then only you will be able to proceed further
Regards
Md.nazeer Shaikh

Managing item cost per warehouse.

Hello,
I have a client who recently migrated from SAP Business one 8.81 to 9.0 PL8. And now they want to manage items cost per warehouse.This is because although the cost and quantities are okay at company level, at warehouse level there are now some negative values as they have been in operation for over 3 years. In the setups, I found out that the manage item cost per warehouse check box settings was not ticked. How do i ensure that this check box is ticked and what procedures do i take to make this happen. The client has more than 2,000 items and about 30 warehouses.
Most of the recommendations in the discussion forum talk about creating a new database, After creating it, how do you go about it. what are the procedures involved?
Kind regards,
Maureen

Hi Maureen,
This setting one time setting and you can not change once Transaction is posted in System. Please also check below link.
https://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo882/helpdata/en/45/07edb6ae742461e10000000a1553f7/content.htm
Please also check below links.
Manage Item Cost by Warehouse Function
changing Manage Item Cost per Warehouse
Manage Item Cost per Warehouse and Warehouse for Damaged Goods
Hope this help
Regards::::
Atul Chakraborty

Manage Item Cost per Warehouse

Previous posts have confirmed that it is not possible to change the Manage Item Cost per Warehouse option once any inventory transactions have been posted. One entry posted in Feb 2010 (below) even offered a link to other "Irreversible Ticks" (although that link is now broken). This limitation is required in order to preserve the relational integrity of the system, within its design architecture.
Manage item cost per warehouse
If a database has been in operation for several years with company-level costing, and business changes now force tracking costs by warehouse, I see no option other than creating a new database with the per-warehouse option, then loading items, inventory, GL, etc. Unfortunately, all history (GL transactions, document history, change log, etc.) is no longer available in that database.
Is anyone aware of SAP plans or tools to support any other alternatives to this kind of business change?
Thanks, Dave

Hi Dave,
I am afraid creating a new database is your only option.
For old data, you may still keep access for certain reports. All open items has to be imported to new db. It is a kind of manual archiving. Your database performance will gain a lot though.
Thanks,
Gordon

Diff b/w Data warehouse and Business Warehouse

Hi all,
what is the Diff b/w Data warehouse and Business Warehouse?

hi..
The diferrence between Datawarehousing and Business Warehouse are as follows.
DataWarehousing is the concept and BIW is a tool that uses this concept in Business applicaitons.
DataWarehousing allows you to analyze tons of data (millions and millions of records of data) in a convinent and optimum way, it is called BIW when applied to Business applications like analyzing the sales of a company.
Advantages- Consedering the volume of business data, BIW allows you to make decisions faster, I mean you can analyze data faster. Support for multiple languges easy to use and so on.
Refer this
Re: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BIW & DATAWAREHOUSING
hope it helps...

Need help to implement a small data warehouse or datamart

Hi all,
we want to improve our reporting activities, we have 3 production and relational oracle databases and we want to elaborate 1 database as reporting database with historized and aggregated data responding to our reporting needs.
The database we are using are oracle database 10g.
actually we still are doing query to retrieve informations from databases for reporting purpose, but fropm inetrnet search i know that we can implement datamart or datawarehouse to group all aggregated information for reporting.
The information i need are: is there a tools in Oracle for Datawarehousing, Is Oracle Warehouse Builder is the right tools as the sources of our data are all from Oracle database and some flat files.
Could yo advise what i'm going to use for that kind of reporting needs, can i use Oracle warehosue builder to develop ETL ...
Do i need license to use Oracle Warehose Builder
Thanks,

As simple answer to all your questions: YES
Yes, Oracle warehouse builder could be a tool to use.
Yes, Orace warehouse builder needs a license.
Besides that you also need a license for that extra Database.
if you already have that, and you have the queries with which you now retrieve data, you can always choose the cheap way and build materialized views with these queries.
Keep in mind however that a materialized view ( of snapshot ) does not support inline selects.
HTH,
FJFranken
My Blog: http://managingoracle.blogspot.com
P.S. If this answers your question, please set the thread to answered and award the points. It is appreciated

Problem during Data Warehouse Loading (from staging table to Cube)

Hi All,
I have created a staging Module in owb to load my flat files to my staging tables.I have created an Warehouse module to load my staging tables to Dimension and Cube that I have created.
My senario:
I have a temp_table_transaction which had loaded my flat files to it .This table had loaded with 168,271,269 milion record as through this flat file.
I have created a mapping in owb which loaded my temp_table_transaction which has join with other tables and some expression and convert function that these numbers fill to a new table called stg_tbl_transaction in my staging module.Running this mapping takes 3 hours and 45 minutes with this configue of my mapping:
Default operation mode in running parameter of Mapp config=Set based
My dimesion filled correctly but I have two problem when I want to transfer my staging table to my Cube:
#1 Problem:
i have created a cube is called transaction_cube with owb and it generated and deployed correctly.
i have created a map to fill my cube with 168,271,268 milon recodes in staging table was called stg_tbl_transaction and deployed it to server (my cube map operating mode is set based)
but after running this map it did not complete after 9 hour and I forced to cancel my running's map by kill its sessions .I want to know this time for loading this capacity of data is acceptable or for this capacity of data we should spend more time.Please let me know if anybody has any Issue.
#2 Problem
To test my map I have created a map with configure set based in operation modes and select my stg_tbl_transaction as source with 168,271,268 records in it and I have created another table to transfer and load my data in it.I wanted to test the time we should spend on this simple map but after 5 hours my data had not loaded in new table.I want to know where is my problem.Should I have set something in configue of map or anothe things.Please guide me about these problems.
CONFIGURATION OF MY SERVER:
i run owb on two socket xeon 5500 series with 192 GB ram and disks with RAID 10 Array
Regards,
Sahar

For all of you
It is possible to load from Infoset to Cube we did it, and it was ok.
Data are really loaded from Infoset (Cube + master dat) to cube.
When you create a transformation under a cube Infoset is proposed, and it works fine ....
Now the process is no more operationnal and i don't understand why .....
Load from infoset to cube is possible, i can send you screen shot if you want ....
Christophe

Performance issues with data warehouse loads

We have performance issues with our data warehouse load ETL process. I have run
analyze and dbms_stats and checked database environment. What other things can I do to optimize performance? I cannot use statspack since we are running Oracle 8i. Thanks
Scott

Hi,
you should analyze the db after you have loaded the tables.
Do you use sequences to generate PKs? Do you have a lot of indexex and/or triggers on the tables?
If yes:
make sure your sequence caches (alter sequence s cache 10000)
Drop all unneeded indexes while loading and disable trigger if possible.
How big is your Redo Log Buffer? When loading a large amount of data it may be an option to enlarge this buffer.
Do you have more then one DBWR Process? Writing parallel can speed up things when a checkpoint is needed.
Is it possible using a direct load? Or do you already direct load?
Dim

Warehouse

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for