Warp stabilizer counting much more frames than actually exists...

Hello, everyone!
I've just installed Premiere CC 2014 and I'm having problems with Warp Stabilizer... I'm trying to use it in clip with 25s and 24fps, but when I click "Analyze" it shows 1035764 frames! Also, it will take 2560 minutes to analyze it all! Doing the math, it should have only something like 600 frames and take much less time...
I know this stabilizer is very buggy, but I couldn't find a solution for this. Can anyone help me?
Thanks in advance!

Well, for some random reason, if I replace each file for itself the bug disappear, i had to do this one by one. If anyone have the same problem, try doing this.
This solves the problem for now, but it took some time to discover and to solve it. Hope it doesn't happen again.

Similar Messages

Time Machine sees more data than actually exists

Another way to put it is that Time Machine requires more space than is needed. I found similar posts, but none that were solved.
My MacPro has a 160GB startup drive, and three 1TB (931.2GB formatted) storage drives in it.
I have a 1TB external FW800 drive (931.2GB formatted). I formatted it using Disk Utility and set it as the Time Machine destination. Using the Time Machine preference pane in System Preferences, I have exluded everything but the startup disk and the 1TB drive with my actual work data on it (we'll call it data_1) .
There's 79GB in use on the startup disk and 702GB in use on data_1. In the "Options" window of the Time Machine preference pane, it says "Total Included 781.9GB"
When I start the first backup, after a short period of 'Preparing' Time Machine delivers an error message that says the backup is too large for the destination and that 931GB are available but 998.41GB are required.
From system.log:
Jan 7 00:42:23 /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd(598): Backup content size: 79.2 GB excluded items size: 8.8 MB for volume davinci
Jan 7 00:42:23 /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd(598): Backup content size: 702.8 GB excluded items size: 0 bytes for volume vivaldi
Jan 7 00:42:23 /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd(598): Starting pre-backup thinning: 998.41 GB requested (including padding), 930.97 GB available
Jan 7 00:42:23 /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd(598): No expired backups exist - deleting oldest backups to make room
Jan 7 00:42:23 /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd(598): Error: backup disk is full - all 0 possible backups were removed, but space is still needed.
Jan 7 00:42:23 /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd(598): Backup Failed: unable to free 998.41 GB needed space
Jan 7 00:42:29 /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd(598): Backup failed with error: Not enough available disk space on the target volume.
Where is the extra 217GB coming from?
I've reset everything; reformatted the drive, turned TM off, cleared the exclusion list, turned TM back on, reset the TM destination, repopulated the exclusion list. Same error.
Time Machine has worked properly on this computer before. I had a smaller external drive, and only backed up the startup disk.

they call me 'Oz' wrote:
1) I can't find any documentation published by Apple that defines recommended drive size. Perhaps I'm not looking hard enough.
My G5 is in the shop, so I can't get to Leopard Help. And I don't find it on their Support pages. This has been reported by people who talked directly with Apple (Apple Care and others).
2) I've run Time Machine on dozens of Macs (I manage a small network) and none of them had a TM drive 3 times the size of the source disk. They all worked, no problems.
Yes, of course, in many, perhaps most, cases 2 times or even less will work. But it depends almost entirely on what size files are updated/added and how often.
3) Based on the error I'm currently getting, TM requires an overhead of 22% just to perform its tasks. Can that be true? And if it is, why isn't this reflected in System Preferences? (i.e.: Total Included: 781GB, an additional 217GB will be required for working space)
Yes, there is a great deal of mystery about it's calculations. You may note from it's system log messages that it requests a certain amount of space "including padding". Just what that consists of, and how it's calculated, is unclear.
My completely uneducated guess is, at least some of it is for the many hundreds of thousands of alias-type files it uses. Remember, when you look in the TM interface, it appears to have one copy of every file for every backup. The vast majority of those, of course, haven't changed, and are represented, somehow, by those special alias files some also call soft links. Whatever they are, they have to take up some small amount of space, but multiply teeny by a minimum of half a million of them per backup . . .
4) I understand that a main feature of TM is that it saves a history of files. But at it's root it is a backup system. Even if you only had enough space for one most recent copy, and one expired copy, you'd still have a backup, which does not defeat the purpose.
Yes of course, but you don't have anywhere near that much space.
I don't mean to be argumentative. But I was hoping to hear something other than "Get a bigger drive." If the 2-3x 'rule of thumb' is correct, wouldn't the minimum size for any of the newer macs be 750GB? Making one of Apple's own products (the 500GB Time Capsule) be incompatible? Especially when the TC is meant for multiple systems. Seems like my only option is to get a raid of some sort.
Or use CarbonCopyCloner, SuperDuper, or the like. Or exclude a lot.
I suppose I'm just frustrated and befuddled at the lack of documentation on this, assuming what you say is true? I guess I'd calm down if I could see some actual documentation. Does anyone have a resource or a reference where this overhead?
Agreed. Why don't you contact Apple directly? And post the results here.

Time Machine takes up much more space than actually data backed up...

Every time I backup with time machine, it uses up gigs of space on my backup drive, regardless of increment or decrement of data on Mac. I could put 200 megs since last backup and TM eats 4 gigs. I don't change the file exclusion selections at all. Just curious if anyone knows why that is?

I find it hard to believe I added 4gb since last backup.
You'd be surprised. Sometimes you add more than you think. Any downloads, recently edited documents, etc all will add to the total. Plus system files such as browser history are updated and backed up as well. If it has been a few days since your last backup, I wouldn't worry. If this is happening ALL the time and you know that you have been barely using your computer, you may have a problem that needs to be further looked into.

Why does my exported swf show more content than actually on frame?

Why does my exported .swf show more content than actually on frame?
My problem is relatively simple, though, I had some trouble finding a solution to it:
When I play my exported animation using flash player in Google Chrome, if the window is bigger than the resolution flash document/frame, it shows content not meant to show up on the frame -- like parts of a huge background that aren't supposed to show up yet.
In other words, how do I constraint the .swf to the white background/document resolution?

Anyone? I'd appreciate it if someone replied soon -- I am done with my project once this issue is resolved, and I am excited to publish it.
Please respond if you have any useful knowledge on the matter!
Thanks!

Since loading Lion, I've experienced much more instability than Snow Leopard. In particular, Mail crashes with regularity, full-screen apps seem to run slower and show the beach ball more often for longer, etc. I'm disappointed with the performance. Any

Since loading Lion, I've experienced much more instability than Snow Leopard. In particular, Mail crashes with regularity, full-screen apps seem to run slower and show the beach ball more often for longer, etc. I love the features, but I'm disappointed with the performance. Any help coming from Apple? I've been sending them so many reports after crashes, that their file must be full!

Summoning max. courage, I did what you advised. Here is the result. What does this tell you? My Lion 7.2 (mid 2011 iMac) has several annoying glitches (which I have so far tolerated through gritted teeth) but none that have actually stopped me working.
BTW, I see several items involving CleanMyMac which I did not know I had. It is generally villified as a trouble-maker. Spotlight can't find an app. or a utility of that name. How can I get rid of what's there please? Just delete?
Last login: Thu Nov 3 20:55:11 on console
Steve-Kirkbys-iMac:~ stevekirkby$ kextstat -kl | awk ' !/apple/ { print $6 $7 } '
com.AmbrosiaSW.AudioSupport(4.0)
Steve-Kirkbys-iMac:~ stevekirkby$ sudo launchctl list | sed 1d | awk ' !/0x|apple|com\.vix|edu\.|org\./ { print $3 } '
Password:
com.openssh.sshd
com.stclairsoft.DefaultFolderXAgent
com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper
com.bombich.ccc.scheduledtask.067493DB-2728-4DF3-87D8-092EF69086E8
com.bombich.ccc
com.adobe.SwitchBoard
Steve-Kirkbys-iMac:~ stevekirkby$ launchctl list | sed 1d | awk ' !/0x|apple|edu\.|org\./ { print $3 } '
com.sony.PMBPortable.AutoRun
uk.co.markallan.clamxav.freshclam
com.veoh.webplayer.startup
com.macpaw.CleanMyMac.volumeWatcher
com.macpaw.CleanMyMac.trashSizeWatcher
com.adobe.ARM.202f4087f2bbde52e3ac2df389f53a4f123223c9cc56a8fd83a6f7ae
com.adobe.AAM.Scheduler-1.0
Steve-Kirkbys-iMac:~ stevekirkby$ ls -1A {,/}Library/{Ad,Compon,Ex,Fram,In,La,Mail/Bu,P*P,Priv,Qu,Scripti,Sta}* 2> /dev/null
/Library/Components:
/Library/Extensions:
/Library/Frameworks:
AEProfiling.framework
AERegistration.framework
ApplicationEnhancer.framework
AudioMixEngine.framework
FxPlug.framework
NyxAudioAnalysis.framework
PluginManager.framework
ProFX.framework
ProMetadataSupport.framework
TSLicense.framework
iLifeFaceRecognition.framework
iLifeKit.framework
iLifePageLayout.framework
iLifeSQLAccess.framework
iLifeSlideshow.framework
/Library/Input Methods:
/Library/Internet Plug-Ins:
AdobePDFViewer.plugin
EPPEX Plugin.plugin
Flash Player.plugin
Flip4Mac WMV Plugin.plugin
JavaAppletPlugin.plugin
Quartz Composer.webplugin
QuickTime Plugin.plugin
SharePointBrowserPlugin.plugin
SharePointWebKitPlugin.webplugin
Silverlight.plugin
flashplayer.xpt
iPhotoPhotocast.plugin
nsIQTScriptablePlugin.xpt
/Library/LaunchAgents:
com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist
com.sony.PMBPortable.AutoRun.plist
/Library/LaunchDaemons:
com.adobe.SwitchBoard.plist
com.apple.remotepairtool.plist
com.bombich.ccc.plist
com.bombich.ccc.scheduledtask.067493DB-2728-4DF3-87D8-092EF69086E8.plist
com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist
com.stclairsoft.DefaultFolderXAgent.plist
/Library/PreferencePanes:
.DS_Store
Application Enhancer.prefPane
Default Folder X.prefPane
DejaVu.prefPane
Flash Player.prefPane
Flip4Mac WMV.prefPane
/Library/PrivilegedHelperTools:
com.bombich.ccc
com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper
com.stclairsoft.DefaultFolderXAgent
/Library/QuickLook:
iWork.qlgenerator
/Library/QuickTime:
AppleIntermediateCodec.component
AppleMPEG2Codec.component
DesktopVideoOut.component
DivX 6 Decoder.component
FCP Uncompressed 422.component
Flip4Mac WMV Advanced.component
Flip4Mac WMV Export.component
Flip4Mac WMV Import.component
LiveType.component
/Library/ScriptingAdditions:
.DS_Store
Adobe Unit Types.osax
Default Folder X Addition.osax
/Library/StartupItems:
Library/Address Book Plug-Ins:
Library/Frameworks:
EWSMac.framework
Library/Input Methods:
.localized
Library/Internet Plug-Ins:
Library/LaunchAgents:
com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist
com.adobe.ARM.202f4087f2bbde52e3ac2df389f53a4f123223c9cc56a8fd83a6f7ae.plist
com.macpaw.CleanMyMac.trashSizeWatcher.plist
com.macpaw.CleanMyMac.volumeWatcher.plist
com.veoh.webplayer.startup.plist
uk.co.markallan.clamxav.freshclam.plist
Library/PreferencePanes:
.DS_Store
Perian.prefPane
WindowShade X.prefPane
Library/QuickTime:
AC3MovieImport.component
Perian.component
Library/ScriptingAdditions:
Steve-Kirkbys-iMac:~ stevekirkby$

My iphone is currently using battery life much more quickly than inthe past, and it also has an icon tht is starying on the screen, to the left of the battery charge percentage, that looks like a lock with a circle around it

i have an iphone that is using battery life much more quickly than in the past, a full charge is going to zero in a half a day or so, with out much use.
an icon is also appearing next to the charge percentage in the top right, and the icon is a circle around a lock
can anyone tell me what the problem is, and what the icon means?

The Icon meas your display orientation is locked to vertical so it wont change when you turn the phone sideways.
First thing you should check with the battery life is multitasking, which also happens to be where the orientation lock can be turned off. check out http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4211 and go from there

OR is taking much more time than UNION

hi gems..
i have written a query using UNION clause and it took 12 seconds to give result.
then i wrote the same query using OR operator and then it took 78 seconds to give the resultset.
The tables which are referred by this qurey have no indexes.
the cost plans for the query with OR is also much more lesser than that with UNION.
please suggest why OR is taking more time.
thanks in advance

Here's a ridiculously simple example. (these tables don't even have any rows in them)
If you had separate indexes on col1 and col2, the optimizer might use indexes in the union but not in the or statement:
Which is faster will depend on the usual list of things.
Of course, the union also requires a sort operation.
SQL> create table table1
2 (col1 number, col2 number, col3 number, col4 number);
Table created.
SQL> create index t1_idx1 on table1(col1);
Index created.
SQL> create index t1_idx2 on table1(col2);
Index created.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select col1, col2, col3, col4
3 from table1
4 where col1> = 123
5 or col2 <= 456;
Explained.
SQL> @xp
| Id | Operation         | Name   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |        |     1 |    52 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TABLE1 |     1 |    52 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter("COL1">=123 OR "COL2"<=456)
SQL> explain plan for
2 select col1, col2, col3, col4
3 from table1
4 where col1 >= 123
5 union
6 select col1, col2, col3, col4
7 from table1
8 where col2 <= 456;
Explained.
SQL> @xp
| Id | Operation                     | Name    | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT              |         |     2 |   104 |     4 (75)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT UNIQUE                  |         |     2 |   104 |     4 (75)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   UNION-ALL                   |         |       |       |            |          |
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TABLE1 |     1 |    52 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T1_IDX1 |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TABLE1 |     1 |    52 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T1_IDX2 |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   4 - access("COL1">=123)
   6 - access("COL2"<=456)

Why is apple Australia so much MORE expensive than America!?

so tell me, Why is apple Australia so much MORE expensive than America!? i have been meaning to pick up a new imac.....and i saw that the exact same type of imac that i want i could pick up in America for a good $600 LESS.... you know, even though our dollar is HIGHER THAN AMERICA'S! *** APPLE!

Reasons:
Australian import duties
Australian taxes on foreign imports
Australian VAT
Got complaints? Talk to your politicians. Apple has nothing to do with it.

Why does Mozilla Firefox download files so much more slowly thanIE

Using Firefox 5.0 just freshly downloaded from the official mozilla.com site last week, I notice that firefox downloads most files '''''MUCH''''' more slowly than when I am using Internet Explorer 8

See this migrate iTunes library post for tips on moving an iTunes library from one computer to another.
See Recover your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device to move your media from a device into a new library if you've failed to migrate the library.
See Backup your iTunes for Windows library with SyncToy to make sure you don't lose the content that is in your library.
If/when something goes wrong with the device you should restore it. If all the content is in your library where it should be then this should be an easy task.
tt2

Is it the time to go to Google? iTunes is much more expensive than Google Play!

I know that iTunes is amazing. But now that Google Play's started renting movies in my country (Brazil) I guess if iTunes worth it's high price for everything...
I have an Apple Tv, what is very good, however isn't complete as well, per exemple that doesn't have a way to change the subtitle size, what's a really simple feature. Otherwise its items are extremelly expense here in my Country. While a movie is rented by Google for R$ 6.99 (~U$3.49) the same movie is rented by iTunes for U$4.99, so I guess: WHY???
Do you guys have the same felling than I have that Apple has charged so much more money that it would? Anyone here is thinking about migrate to Google Play/Android plataform?
Why do you guys think about all of that?

If you find a better price elsewhere, by all means patronize that other company if you wish. We have no control over pricing here, we just being fellow users, and these forums are for technical support questions, not pricing debates or comments, so further discussion on the matter really isn't appropriate here.
Regards.

Mail shows it is receiving more messages than actually appear

Mail shows that there more emails being downloaded than actually appear in my inbox. I have checked other folders (Spam, etc) to see where the extra messages disappear to.
Cannot see that there is a connection between incoming and received (i.e. cannot see that there are twice as many expected than actually appear, etc).
I have multiple accounts, so I cannot tell if it relates to a particular account.
Thanks

Since we know it's not sending multiple emails, and this is a POP account you're having a problem with, we can try two things:
1. Quit Mail.
2. Go to Home/Library/Mail and delete the Envelope Index file, and the account mailbox folder for your IMAP account (it probably begins with "IMAP-") to the Trash. You don't need to empty the Trash yet, just move these items there.
3. Restart Mail and let it reindex your mail, and then check to see if the problem goes away.

Is CLAD real much more difficult than CLAD on-line free demo?

I am about to give CLAD offline (there is no testing center here and a NI representative would be coming to take the CLAD exams of four of us). We / I have practiced the free on-line version of CLAD exam at NI site. I have heard that the real exam is much more difficult. Is this true? What is the diference between the two? (Like passing marks etc).
Thanks for the help!

The proctored CLAD exam is slightly more difficult than the on-line version. Some of the questions from the on-line exam were on the test as were some of the questions from the example exam. If you handled the material in those two exams well, you should pass. To get 70%, you can get 12 out of the 40 wrong. My feeling while taking the test was that there was no way I had 12 wrong because there are enough easy questions. It's a good test because it forces you to learn some trivial details you may not have paid attention to before.

Ibooks much more expensive than kindle books

Is there somewhere within Apple ibookstore that you can raise the issue of a book being much more expensive in ibookstore compared to Aussie Kindle store?

The prices for each ibook are set by the publisher/rights-holder - some might be cheaper on Amazon/Kindle, some in the iBookstore or in one of the other ebook apps/stores (Nook, Kobo).
You can leave feedback for Apple via one of these pages, but only the publisher can change the price :
iBooks iOS app feedback : http://www.apple.com/feedback/ibooks_ios.html
iTunes stores feedback : http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html

Why SQL2 took much more time than SQL1?

I run these 2 SQLs sequencely.
--- SQL1: It took 245 seconds.
create table PORTAL_DAYLOG_100118_bak
as
select * from PORTAL_DAYLOG_100118;
--- SQL2: It took 3105 seconds.
create table PORTAL_DAYLOG_100121_bak
as
select * from PORTAL_DAYLOG_100121;
It is really strange that SQL2 took almost 13 times than SQL1, with nearly same data amount and same data structure in the same tablespace.
Could anyone tell me the reason? or How could I find out why?
Here is more detail info. for my case,
--- Server:
[@wapbi.no.sohu.com ~]$ uname -a
Linux test 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 11:41:38 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--- DB
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
--- Tablespace:
CREATE TABLESPACE PORTAL DATAFILE
'/data/oradata/wapbi/portal01.dbf' SIZE 19456M AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 1024M MAXSIZE UNLIMITED,
'/data/oradata/wapbi/portal02.dbf' SIZE 17408M AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 1024M MAXSIZE UNLIMITED
LOGGING
ONLINE
PERMANENT
EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL AUTOALLOCATE
BLOCKSIZE 8K
SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO
FLASHBACK ON;
--- Tables:
SQL> select table_name,num_rows,blocks,avg_row_len from dba_tables
2 where table_name in ('PORTAL_DAYLOG_100118','PORTAL_DAYLOG_100121');
TABLE_NAME                       NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS AVG_ROW_LEN
PORTAL_DAYLOG_100118             20808536     269760          85
PORTAL_DAYLOG_100121             33747911     440512          86
CREATE TABLE PORTAL_DAYLOG_100118
IP           VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
NODEPATH     VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
PG           VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
PAGETYPE     INTEGER,
CLK          VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
FR           VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
PHID         INTEGER,
ANONYMOUSID VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
USID         VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
PASSPORT     VARCHAR2(200 BYTE),
M_TIME       CHAR(4 BYTE)                     NOT NULL,
M_DATE       CHAR(6 BYTE)                     NOT NULL,
LOGDATE      DATE
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
NOCACHE
NOPARALLEL
MONITORING;
CREATE TABLE PORTAL_DAYLOG_100121
IP           VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
NODEPATH     VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
PG           VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
PAGETYPE     INTEGER,
CLK          VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
FR           VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
PHID         INTEGER,
ANONYMOUSID VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
USID         VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
PASSPORT     VARCHAR2(200 BYTE),
M_TIME       CHAR(4 BYTE)                     NOT NULL,
M_DATE       CHAR(6 BYTE)                     NOT NULL,
LOGDATE      DATE
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
NOCACHE
NOPARALLEL
MONITORING;Any comment will be really appeciated!!!
Satine

Hey Anurag,
Thank you for your help!
Here it is.
SQL1:
create table portal.PORTAL_DAYLOG_100118_TEST
as
select * from portal.PORTAL_DAYLOG_100118
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1    374.69     519.05     264982     265815     274858    20808536
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2    374.69     519.05     264982     265815     274858    20808536
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: SYS
Rows     Row Source Operation
      0 LOAD AS SELECT (cr=268138 pr=264982 pw=264413 time=0 us)
20808536   TABLE ACCESS FULL PORTAL_DAYLOG_100118 (cr=265175 pr=264981 pw=0 time=45792172 us cost=73478 size=1768725560 card=20808536)SQL2:
create table portal.PORTAL_DAYLOG_100121_TEST
as
select * from portal.PORTAL_DAYLOG_100121
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1   1465.72    1753.35     290959     291904     300738    22753695
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2   1465.72    1753.35     290959     291904     300738    22753695
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: SYS
Rows     Row Source Operation
      0 LOAD AS SELECT (cr=295377 pr=290960 pw=289966 time=0 us)
22753695   TABLE ACCESS FULL PORTAL_DAYLOG_100121 (cr=291255 pr=290958 pw=0 time=56167952 us cost=80752 size=1956817770 card=22753695)Best wishes,
Satine

Much more cumbersome than CS2, several questions

I just got back from a 10 day trip having shot about 2000 picutures and dowloading them to Aperture day by day. I had previously used Abobe CS2 but since I have a new Macbook Pro I decided to give Aperature a try. Now I'm not sure I won't regret the decision.
A few quick (I hope) questions.
If I just shot a jpeg instead of Raw+ jpeg for some pictues, doe sthis still show up in Aperture.
When I used to import to iPhoto I could go into Finder and locate either the Raw or JPEG or open the Raw in Adobe Bridge/camera raw. Now, the only thing I see in a Finder Window is an icon for the entire Aperature library. IS there no way to locate individual files?
I don't see anyway to locate the raw files except within Aperture. Does this eman I have no option to process the Raw in anything but Aperture?
While I was on the road, I did process one raw image. Now, the original shows up in the main window, the processed shows up in the thumnail, and I can't seem to bring the processed image back up in the main window. This seems very cumbersone compared to CS2.
thanks for your help,
Jordan

jordan:
When I used to import to iPhoto I could go into
Finder and locate either the Raw or JPEG or open the
Raw in Adobe Bridge/camera raw. Now, the only thing
I see in a Finder Window is an icon for the entire
Aperature library. IS there no way to locate
individual files?
in short, yes. the Aperture library is actually a special folder called a bundle. the OS generally treats bundles as a single file, but actually it is a folder. if you right click on the Aperture library file and choose "Show Contents" it will open the file as a folder. in here you can see all the projects and XML files that make up the library. unless you really know what you're doing, i wouldn't mess with anything in here. the potential for corrupting your library is very, very high.
I don't see anyway to locate the raw files except
within Aperture. Does this eman I have no option to
process the Raw in anything but Aperture?
the easiest way to get your RAW files back out of the Aperture library for something like this is to select an image in Aperture and choose Export->Masters from the File menu. however, if you want to have the choice of editing RAW files with another editor, consider importing the files as referenced rather than managed (see the manual for an explaination of the difference).
While I was on the road, I did process one raw image.
Now, the original shows up in the main window, the
processed shows up in the thumnail, and I can't seem
to bring the processed image back up in the main
window. This seems very cumbersone compared to
CS2.
Aperture lets you toggle between showing the master file (unprocessed RAW file) and the version (which is the file with all the adjustments applied). maybe what you were seeing was the master. showing the master could easily be done by accident as the 'M' key is what causes it to toggle. it would show a badge at the top center of the image with the word "Master" if you were viewing the master image though.
good luck,
scott
PowerMac G5 2.5GHz Mac OS X (10.4.8) MacBook Pro 2.0GHz

Warp stabilizer counting much more frames than actually exists...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for