Warp Stabilizer? (CS6)

Hello,
I recently shot a video that I did not have a rig for, so I had to shoot it handheld. The video looks fine and all, except it is a bit shaky... I've tried the warp stabilizer but it warps the video horrifically. The shot is between two main characters talking, then walking off, with the camera making a full circle around them before following them out. Is there any way that this warping can be put to rest so my video can be more stable?
Thanks,
Jack Reynolds
Premiere Pro CS6, Windows 8.1

Hello,
I recently shot a video that I did not have a rig for, so I had to shoot it handheld. The video looks fine and all, except it is a bit shaky... I've tried the warp stabilizer but it warps the video horrifically. The shot is between two main characters talking, then walking off, with the camera making a full circle around them before following them out. Is there any way that this warping can be put to rest so my video can be more stable?
Thanks,
Jack Reynolds
Premiere Pro CS6, Windows 8.1

Similar Messages

  • Warp Stabilizer CS6 scales down last frame

    Hey,
    Every time I add the Warp Stabilizer in Premiere Pro CS6, it auto-scales the footage, except for the last frame. It just changes to 100% again, so I'll just have to cut it off. Any others experiencing this issue, or any ways to solve it?
    Thanks in advance.
    Edit: turns out it's probably not the warp stabilizer, but the position. When I adjust the position, the same thing happens, and since the stabilizer changes the position, the position will probably be causing the issue. Keyframing is disabled.

    This strikes me as a bug that hasn't been corrected.
    Is there a way to see if it has even been reported? (I don't want to add a redundant bug report).
    I'm having what I think is the same- or similar - problem in PPro CC.
    Machine: Windows 7 Pro,
    i7-3930K @ 3.20 GHz with 32 GB memory
    nVidia GeForce GTX 670.
    Both CC and CS 6 installed.
    I have a single clip of video footage exactly 19 seconds  (00;00;19;00)  long in Track V1.
    I have added the Warp Stabilizer effect to Track V1, let it analyze and stabilize, and when playing, the last frame is "chopped off" by a noticeable percentage.
    When selecting the Effect Controls tab, the Opacity keyframe icon is "active", though still set at 100%.
    I lowered the clip Opacity, moved the pointer a few seconds to the left via left-arrow, and re-played.
    The last frame is still chopped off.
    I returned the clip Opacity to 100%, moved the pointer a few seconds to the left, and re-played.
    The frame is still chopped off.
    This "solution" appears to have no effect for me.
    I also need the Timecode effect for this same clip, and have noticed strange things with it.
    Although my footage in Track V1 is exactly 19:00,
    - AFTER I've added the Warp Stabilizer effect to Track V1, AND
    - have added an Adjustment Layer to Track V2 in the sequence, AND
    - have added the Timecode effect to the Adjustment layer in Track V2,
    when I point to the last frame, the Timecode effect shows 18:29, not 19:00. After moving 1 frame to the left, i.e. hitting left-arrow once. the Timecode also shows 18:29. so the Timecode is showing the same numbers twice.
    It seems that the Timecode effect is somehow "losing track" of what frame is being displayed.(Is it "counting from '1' instead of '0')?
    Any help available in this?
    I've even gone so far as to:
    1) change, i.e. lower, the Opacity, save the project, then return the Opacity to 100%, then saved the project again; last frame still "chopped off".
    2) once the opacity was lowered, I've also rendered the sequence, saved the project, then returned the Opacity to 100%, and re-rendered, but the problem remains.
    3) I even "cleared" both the Warp Stabilizer effect from the footage clip, AND the clip from within the sequence, then added the clip back to the sequence WITHOUT the Warp Stabilzer effect, then pointed at the final frame, and that final frame is STILL chopped off.
    For this project, I'm "sticking" with CC, because I'm working on it from both my home studio and another location which has only CC.
    I haven't checked CS6 to see if the Warp Stabilizer and Timecode effects are working correctly, but both seem to have gone a little "haywire".
    Is there some other way to fix the problem of the last frame being "chopped off"?

  • AE Warp Stabilizer (C5.5) Vs. Premiere Pro Warp Stabilizer(CS6)

    Was wondering what folks experience was in CS6 with WS in Premiere Pro ?
    Is it the same WS as in CS 5.5 in AE ? Has it been improved ?
    My expereince with WS in CS5.5 (AE) has been very hit and miss. Some scenarios it works very well, others it tends to "warp" the footage so that it appears to be a disco scene on speed.
    Any CS6 folks care to chime in ?
    Thanks.

    It seems that Premiere CS6 stabilizer is identical to AE CS5.5
    Sometimes it helps to use Detailed Analysis, but in my case it did not work. I have a boat in the storm because stabilizer hooked to the moving object. I would like Adobe to add the ability to mark some key points, because full auto is not a professional style of work. However, even if I'll do a feature request it will not be implemented until CS12. I would be very surprised to see some improvements in CS6.5/CS7, but it is not Adobe style. This issue is known for 2 years from now and it is sad that they think about features quantity, but not feature quality (in terms of functions).
    Sorry for being emotional, but 2 bugs for one project is too much for me for today.
    However, I would like to thank them for adding Adjustment Layers. Saves time a lot.

  • Warp Stabilizer through After Effects Dynamic Link Locks up in CS6

    Hey Gang,
    I've been using Warp Stabilizer through dynamic link in CS5.5 without issues.  However, when I go through dynamic link into AE, then apply Warp Stabilizer, AE locks up?
    I can apply any other effects through this path in AE without issue, but when I try to apply WS, I get the "Analyze", but AE stops cold there. 
    I've tried:
    -Opening new project in PP with basic 5 second clip.  Then going through dynamic link into AE, and applying warp stabilizer first thing.  AE locks up there with the simplest flow.
    -I have the latest downloads of the entire production CS6 suite.
    -If I apply warp stabilizer directly in Premiere CS6 (which I did not know previously I could do), it works fine! (Just noticed Warp Stabilizer is present in PP CS6, but not in CS5.5). 
    -If I try to import the Premiere project from AE, AE locks up doing that?
    It appears there are multiple issues here:
    1. I can't apply Warp Stabilizer in After Effects, and doing so crashes AE.
    2. I can't import a Premiere project into After Effects, and doing so crashes AE too?
    I'm assuming I'm going to need to download AE again?
    Thank you for any help and suggestions you may have!
    Derek...
    Message was edited by: Derek Emmett

    Hello Mylenium,
    thank you for your input.  Naturally I would expect if my work flow in CS5.5 works great, I would not have to make any changes in CS6 to accomplish the same task.  With that said, I made it as simple as possible for CS6 AE to handle the Warp Stabilizer effect, and it crashed?  If I went directly back to CS5.5, no problems at all in AE (same source footage, but of course different projects).  When I first tried CS6 AE it appeared to work fine, even when doing Warp effects.  So when I ran into the issue I saw above, I started thinking it was possible the update I did to AE may have caused some other issue.  By the way, the projects I open in both CS5.5 vs. CS6 were independent, meaning, I did not convert a CS5.5 job to CS6, etc...   (See notes below).
    My setup is standard:
    i7 960
    16G mem
    Nvidia Quadro 4k
    Footage is Canon 5D Mkii 1080p
    All drivers up to date.
    -I think going back and forth between CS5.5 and CS6 may have caused some issues?  When I rebooted my system, CS6 AE seems to work fine when applying Warp Stabilizer effects again. 
    -What I did find more interesting and effective, was that CS6 Premiere has Warp Stabilizer right in its own effects now!  Works great in the premiere flow and plays back far better then going through the Dynamic Link with After Effects!  When playing Dynamic link effects back in Premiere, I'm sure everyone sees performance issues in the playback.  However, in at least with applying Warp Stabilizer directly in Premiere, the playback performance is much better.
    Thank you
    Derek...

  • Warp Stabilizer in CS6 does not work at all

    When using the CS6 Premiere Pro Warp stabilizer it starts to analyze but doesn't start to convert after it has finished analyzing.
    - Add the Warp Stabilizer
    - Blue bar over picture shows up "Analyzing in Background (Part1 of 2)
    - Prozess finishes but nothing happens (Source does not get corrected, orange bar never shows up)
    - Another blue bar shows "Click Analyze to begin"
    When pressing Analyze the process starts over again without any result.
    The used footage is some mxf from a Canon C300
    The used PC gots 8 cores, 32GB Memory
    Update:
    When using a different Clip, or if i shorten the problematic clip, it seems to work now
    Info to problematic clip:
    File Path: xxx.MXF
    Type: XDCAM-HD Movie
    File Size: 44.5 MB
    Image Size: 1920 x 1080
    Frame Rate: 25.00
    Source Audio Format: 48000 Hz - 16 bit - Mono
    Project Audio Format: 48000 Hz - 32 bit floating point - Mono
    Total Duration: 00:00:07:05
    Pixel Aspect Ratio: 1.0
    Compression Type: MPEG 4:2:2

    I could not help laughing at Jim's remark. I remember showing my 20 minute video of our trip to Italy to my brothers way back in 2002. In fact, it was my first Premiere project. I had the sense to cut it way down from 20 one hour tapes to 20 minutes. My oldest brother may have thought he was being a little insulting with his remark, but I was overjoyed. He said "It looks like a PBS travelogue." That was, of course, exactly what I was going for with the video and the voiceover.
    In any case, I was able to use Warp Stabilizer this weekend on some footage of a children's birthday party. I can't show the results because of the subject matter. Not that they were doing anything wrong other than savagely beating a poor Super Mario Brother's pinata, but I don't have a release for them all.
    I was a bit surprised at how long it took. I have a state of the art PC, and apparently the GPU doesn't help. I liked the results, but I sure would like to know what resources the effect utilizes. This is a screenshot of what it looked like about two minutes into the 11 minute process (the effect window estimated 8 minutes) for stabilizing a 60 second video (1800 frames). I think maybe I will start another thread to inquire about this. The CPU wasn't even breathing hard, the hard drives I am using for cache are in RAID0 - so should be reasonably fast.  Hmmm. I wonder?

  • Is there a warp stabilizer or video stabilizer plug-in for cs6 ?

    is there a warp stabilizer or video stabilizer plug-in for cs6 ?

    For Acrobat Pro? I don't really understand. You don't typically *edit* PDFs in a browser.
    Note that Acrobat Reader is totally unnecessary on OS X. I'd recommend avoiding it. If you are creating PDFs, or doing advanced features that make it worth spending hundreds of dollars, then Acrobat Pro may make sense, but otherwise, just use Preview.

  • Premiere Pro CS6 - Warp Stabilizer BUG causes project to crash

    Hi!
    Sometimes Warp Stabilizer causes Premiere CS6 to crash. I found out what steps cause this so hopefully a fix can be made in an update soon:
    1) Add the WARP STABILIZER to a clip. It Analyzes and then is applied to the clip.
    2) TOGGLE OFF the effect in the effect controls window
    3) Adjust the clip duration and RE-ANALYZE while the effect is TOGGLED OFF still and Premiere crashes.
    Happens every time. BUG Report was filled out.
    (If the effect is toggled ON when you RE-ANALYZE it, everything works okay.)
    So why not just not do this? Well, I usually don't but sometimes in the middle of working with hundred of clips I toggle on/off the effect to check certain things and then leave it off. If the clip is adjusted later or I come back and try to click ANALYZE again while the effect is toggled off, everything crashes.
    That's the pop up. If Premiere doesn't allow for you to re-analyze a clip while the effect is toggled off, then the ANALYZE button should not be active or at least a popup saying "Cannot Analyze this clip while it is toggled off". Instead Premiere crashes and upon reopening the project you are forced to rename the project which fortunately is usually fully recovered.
    Running 6.0.2 on a suped up 2011 27" iMac with 16gb ram and AMD 6970M 2gb video card.

    I know I'm piggy-backing on an old post here, but I've just had real issues with a similar thing on Mac. Unfortunately, my Premiere CS6 is crashing and becoming totally unresponsive whenever I simply apply the Warp Stabilizer. The moment I drop it on my clip, BLAM! I get that same pop up you posted. I click 'OK,' and then nothing. Just beachbal of death until I force quit. What's more annoying is that, not only has the camera operator made the stabilizer essential, but I've been using it for the past week with no issues up till now.
    At first I thought I was overloading Premiere by dropping the effect onto two clips at the same time. But I tried it one at a time and had the same problem. My recovery project files seem to be ok, but that's not even nearly the point. I simply can not use a great and essential tool. Help?

  • Warp Stabilizer in Premiere CS6 is excellent

    I shot some video from a helicopter over Iguassu Falls in South America recently.  The clips were unuseable UNTIL
    CS6 came along with Warp Stabilizer.
    The link below shows how effextive the Stabilizer effect is.
    http://youtu.be/mhNplx5tBQU

    Thanks for you comments. Cam shake is a big devil for us amateurs. I have upgraded from a large Sony FX1 to a tiny tiny Panasonic TM700
    and have major problems shooting hand held without shake, even though the cam has a good stablizer.
    It is just that the cam is so tiny. So now I use a little "mealeable" tripod, 2 arms are my handle and the third arm dug into my tummy.
    Really should use a full tripod, but how inconvenient when travelling.
    Then I look at all the fellow travellers who are not into the hobby like I am. Some poor audience????
    Now I have the CS6 Premiere Warp Stablizer.  but but lots of changes to the Premiere workspace, especially the timeling area.
    Do not know if I like the changes YET!! We shall see.
    Thanks again

  • Best way to warp stabilize between premiere cs6 and AE cs6

    I have a sequence with many clips, some with different speed (warp stabilizer doesn't work with speed in premiere CS6) whats the best way to stabilize these videos that are in different speeds?
    Another question, in CS 5.5 I used the warp stabilizer in 1080P clips on a 720p composition (with fit to composition) this way I warp stabilizer could zoom/crop the video without loosing quality. Now premiere CS6 has warp stabilizer but I can use a 720P sequence with a 1080p video, warp stabilizer won't accept it.So whats the best way to do this in premiere CS6? (to get 1080p video stabilized in 720p sequence) or I can just stabilize in 1080p and export the final video to 720p and I will have the same quality?
    Thanks

    You can make a new sequence from that 1080p file, stabilize it, nest it, then copy and paste it into your 720p project. This way you won't need to export it beforehand.
    I notice this topic is old, but it may help someone.
    Best,
    Bogdan

  • Premiere Pro CS6 Warp Stabilizer not using GPU/CUDA why?

    Hi,
    I installed CS6 and tried the Warp Stabilizer, I undestand that only part 2 of the process (stabilize part) is GPU accelerated, but I can't get any acceleration from GPU, my GPU is idle at 1% usage (GTX580) and all the processing is going to CPU. The renderer/playback is marked CUDA so its not that.
    Is there anything I'm missing?
    Thanks

    OK, this surprised me a bit. I have a state-of-the-art new PC with plenty of RAM, a fast processor and lots of cuda cores. See the specs here: http://www.stevengotz.com/
    It took over 10 minutes to stabilize one minute of video - 1800 frames. It wasn't all that shaky to begin with, but it was handheld and therefore looks better after using Warp. There was one section that was so bad, I sliced the clip up and chose not to stabilize that part after the fact. So I thought that it might have added a little to the problem. But no. I tried just 180 frames of reasonably stable hand held video from the same clip and it took almost a minute.
    Now, once the process was finished, I had no problem playing it back in realtime without rendering. But what is taking so long? I understand that there is a lot of work to do, but why isn't it using the power I have provided?
    This is a screen shot of my resources about two minutes into the process.
    I would love to know what I need to do to speed up this process. I get that it is working in the background. Is it possible to make it work in the foreground? I would not mind if it maxed out the RAM or the CPU or both if it would help.
    edit: I just submitted a Feature Request to let Warp run in the foreground using every available resource.
    Steven
    Message was edited by: Steven L. Gotz to include additional information.

  • CS6 Warp Stabilizer giving me a very small window results

    I am beginning to use Warp Stabilizer in CS6 Prem Pro.  Just trying to use it on a short 4 minute clip.
    I have read the posts of people that have had issues with it running.  Mine analyzes fine and completes.  However, my result is a very, very small window of video.  I am using the default settings which allows up to 150% scaling so not sure why the result is so small.
    It almost looks cropped or if it reset the aspect ratio?
    FWIW , I think it looks like it "worked", appears smoother. But hard to tell with the narrow viewing window.
    Any assistance appreciated.
    BJBBJB1

    Thanks to all for your insightful comments!!  I will definitely try to cut down the length and omit an pans which may be confusing the stabilizer.
    I was hoping it would be able to avoid instances of things like that but I I guess that is what causing the results I am seeing. Because I don't think the shaking is so bad you would need half the frame to fix it!
    It is just a clip of HDV outdoors, handheld, with some panning, etc.  shot with an HV20.  Sequence settings match the HDV resolution.  I'll cut the panning out and try again.
    Good to see other are seeing those results and were able to improve by playing with the parameters.
    Thanks again,
    BJBBJB1

  • Warp Stabilizer in Premiere Pro CS6

    I was glad to see Warp Stablizer in PP so that it would not require AE. However, I found it to destabilize (no pun intended) Adobe Media Encoder such that the video would fail to render and I couldn't retry without restarting the computer. After about four or so reboots, I tried removing the Warp Stablizer effect from one of my nested sequences and suddenly the render succeeded.
    FWIW, I don't know if it's related, but the sequence setting was 720p but the nested sequence that had the warp stabilization applied to only one clip therein was 1080p.
    I do have GPU hardware acceleration enabled (not that Warp Stabilizer uses it that I know of).
    Is this a known issue, and does anyone have any suggestions for a workaround other than going back to using AE a la CS5.5?
    Also, on a side note does anyone know what process I need to kill after a failed render like this so that I don't have to keep rebooting? The dynamiclinkmanager process got rid of a hung Media Encoder on exit but didn't resolve the hung Media Encoder on restarting to render.
    Jon

    Have you tried rendering just that shot out to a file without the rest of the sequence?    If you can do that then you can reimport that shot in to Premiere and use it 'ready-stabilized'.
    We've exported several sequences that have lots of Warp Stabilizer clips and not seen the problem (yet!). 

  • CS6. Need to have time remapping and warp stabilizer work together.

    This should be obvious for most people. These two effects must be made to work together.
    If you're shooting with a glider you're usually moving very carefully (read: slower than normal) so the footage in post would need to be sped up plus stabilized a bit.
    Currently warp stabilizer and time remapping cannot be applied at the same time. But I *need* it to be applied at the same time. I need a workaround.
    Should I:
    1. shorten the clips, export them, re-import them into the project, and then apply stabilizer?
    2. apply the stabilizer, export them, re-import them into the project, and then shorten them?
    How do I export individual clips as just seperate clips while Premiere? Do I have to drag them into an empty timeline one by one, apply the stabilizer/remapping, and export, remove the clip, put in the second clip, etc all one by one?
    I've used Mercalli in the past and I time remap the footage and then apply Mercalli to the accelerated clip. Mercalli doesn't mind a bit.

    ComputerNovice25 wrote:
    Adobe might have written the code in a way that doesn't include the ability to deal with that extra variable. I'm assuming that when it's nested it then makes the timeline it's in just read it as a normal clip again instead of a clip with a non-supported variable included.
    Although I'm totally just guessing, but if what I'm saying is correct it would mean a fix wouldn't be very much work at all. Which means in the future they could simply provide a quick and easy patch to fix this. I'd highly suggest to make a feature request.
    https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
    Does Adobe read these feature requests? I often have a hard time justifying spending time to type out something when I feel like it's just being thrown into a black hole. I'm sure the team gets thousands of feature requests. It's like the lottery. Statistically you will never win. Sure, you'll never win if you don't play, but it's still a waste of time to play. I know, I'm pessimistic. Just don't have much faith in conglomerates - although Lightroom 3 is by far the most perfect program I have ever used and I would kiss the LR3 team if I could.
    With Lightroom, Photoshop is hardly needed anymore unless absolutely necessary or for truly intensive chop-like edits. Premiere DESPERATELY needs a Lightroom equivalent.
    I have half a mind to guess (nicely) that you video guys have absolutely no idea what you're missing out on, workflow-wise. It's life-changing. Literally.
    I'm doing a video right now and I can't stop thinking about how if I had a Lightroom workflow, this video consisting of 40 clips, 40 titles, 40 transitions, audio tracks could be on the way to final export in 5 minutes. 5 MINUTES. And be 100% as good as if I had to spend an hour doing this in traditional Premiere.

  • Where is the Warp Stabilizer plugin located in After Effects CS6 program files?

    I need to delete the plugin temporarily to gain access to my project because it constantly crashes on start up due to the Warp Stabilizer.

    NOt sure if you can actually remove it,but it should be in the plugins/extensions sub-folder inside the AE install folder. Anyway, try the usual troubleshooting first before taking such a radical step that may destroy AE and require a reinstall. Flush the caches, open the project with capslock and remove the effect.
    MYlenium

  • When is Adobe going to fix Warp Stabilizer?

    I asked this question back in February but I only got one reply. Warp Stabilizer may provide decent footage stabilization, but it is incredibly poorly coded, especially when compared to Mercalli Pro, or the Edius 7 Pro stabilizer, which I believe is a lite version of Mercalli Pro. One would think that since it was introduced at least 3 years ago (I can't remember if the first version it came with was CS6 or a previous one), Adobe would have troubleshot it and fixed its terrible performance. I mean, we're not talking about a stabilizer that is half as slow as Mercalli Pro. Warp Stabilizer is 14.5 times slower than Mercalli Pro. These are times for one minute of footage, the same footage in both NLEs:
    Edius Pro 7 Stabilizer: 29 seconds
    Premiere Pro Warp Stabilizer normal analysis and solving: 12 minutes 16 seconds
    Warp Stabilizer detailed analysis and solving: 14 minutes 28 seconds
    This is on a six core i7 3930k CPU with 32 GB of RAM and two GTX770 cards with 4 GB each (even though WP doesn't use the graphics card for analyzing and solving, only for playback)
    And the terrible analyzing and solving times are not the only problem. If you decide to run WP on a long clip, say 13 minutes long, even after the two hours that it takes to analyze and solve, the next time you open that project, be prepared to not be able to use Premiere for who knows how long. I say who knows because about 30 minutes ago I opened Premiere, loaded the project, and it froze completely when it was loading the footage files. For the last half hour, Premiere has been stuck with the spinning circle mouse pointer. Task Manager shows that Premiere has zero CPU usage and about 3 GB of RAM usage. So it's doing nothing at all, just frozen because Warp Stabilizer is one of the worst coded pieces of software not only from Adobe, but from any company.
    Putting aside the terrible analyzing and solving times, and the eternal wait next time you load the project, there's the fact that as soon as you use WP on a few clips, or on one long clip, saving times are unbearably slow.
    So I'm just asking, what makes a company with the huge resources Adobe has, not only launch a plugin that performs so terrible, but also doing nothing to fix it for three years or more?

    In this case, yes, I have a 13 minute long take that I have to stabilize. However, the original footage clip is a few minutes longer, so I'm not trying to stabilize the full clip, only most of it.
    I could spend a lot of money on the plugin, but I usually don't have a lot of footage that needs stabilization. Besides, I already have the plugin that came bundled with Edius 6, so I just use that when I need to. However, since Adobe advertises Warp Stabilizer as part of Premiere, and the plugin is absolutely dreadful, it seems to me that it's false advertising. I would much rather use WP in my Premiere project rather than having to load the footage in Edius and then export to a gigantic file to avoid losing picture quality.
    As for drive space, I have two 3 TB very fast hard drives that have plenty of empty space. Besides, Mercalli Pro in Edius analyses and solves this long clip in about ten minutes, as opposed to the over two hours WP needs for the same clip. In fact, in Premiere I only applied WP to part of the clip, when in Edius I loaded the original AVCHD clip so I can just do a replace in Premiere and have the same ins and outs.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Iweb site works in safari but not netsape or explorer

    I just found out the site i had up doesnt work in explorer or safari, it comes up, but all the navigation tabs are gone so there is no way to get from page to page... I looked at the same site an older verson on my HD done with iweb o7 and it works f

  • Itunes upgrade

    I upgraded to the 7.2 whatever ******** and now my itunes wont open. Installation went fine, quicktime will still open but it shows no errors when itunes doesnt open. I have nortons if that means anything. I just got an ipod and now i can't put music

  • Purchase Order printing by smartforms

    Hi all I am trying to print PO by Smartforms. Problem is that this has to be done copying standard program. How to go about it. I searched the forum and it talked about the driver program /BPR3PF/FM06P and preconfigured Smartform /BPR3PF/MMPO_L both

  • SSIS XML task date format issue

    Hi, there; I created an SSIS package XML task to import customer XML data.     The LocaleID is set to "New Zealand"         I have an xml file which has date fields as attribute (dd/MM/yyyy). I created this package and run it in an .NET console progr

  • 8800GT and 7300G as second card ?

    I am hoping to get the new 8800gt for the older mac pro but want to keep my second monitor on a 7300gt (I currently have 2 7300 in the computer) ... Can I just pop the fist card out and put the 8800 in and just keep the second 7300 running my second