WBS cost to be settle to Asset
Hi Frds,
I have one requirement regarding some asset work is under construction against the project.If work is under construction all cost is booking to project gl(we are using only 4 project gl,500000-labour,500001-material,500002-subcon and 500003-directcharg.),if cost is booking to project gl has to settle the cost at the menth end to project gl,but here once total work has finished after that only project gl cost has to settle or has to capitalized to the asset.
If i am not settling the project gl some cost will be show in the cji3 report,if i settle that will be capitalized partial amount but that is not correct.This is nothing but AUC(Asset under construction) how will i do the allocation structure and settlement profile configuration and how will achive this requirement.
Thanks for your advance help.
Regards,
Nivas.
Hi,
It is resolved.
We have done the AUC settings in the system.Once we have done the project settlement cost will go to Asset once work has done(After 2 or 3 months) in AIAB has to create the settlement rule and run the settlement(AIBU),Asset will be capitalized automatically.
Similar Messages
-
Reversal of settlement from Asset to WBS
Hi Experts,
I have a question regarding reversal of settlement from AUC to asset.
I have so many line items on a WBS element, which i settled to AUC. I can see all the line items that are capitalized to AUC in CJIC screen, where i create settlement rules to settle to asset.
I have created one settlement rule for 4 line items and settled to an Asset 1. After that I have created another settlment rule for another 5 line items to settle to an asset 2 and run the settlement in CJ88 using partial capitalization, since I have some more lines left in the CJIC.
Now, when I am trying to reverse the settlement on WBS system is reversing whatever settled on asset 2 to back to AUC. I want to reverse the line items settled on Asset 1. Is it possible? If so, how can i do that? I can see all the settlements on the WBS in CJID. But, how can i reverse any settlement that is 3 to 4 months older. We are doing 4 to 5 settlements in a month
Thanks,
Satyareversal transaction will reverse what was transacted
so you need to reverse for both asset 1 and 2 and then edefine the settlement as required after correction and then settle again -
Cost Centre with Settlement documents.
Regards, Hi everybody.
We are posting the entries with CAT2 and transferring with CAT5 and settling the values to the upper level WBS.
Once the settlement is done, the values will be pooling up with Profit centre.
The requirement is, instead of profit centre it need to be cumulated based on cost centre consolidation wise and need to be displayed with the accounting documents.
Please suggest.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,Hi Abdul,
It is not with report. after doing the settlement it I displays with the accounting document overview and profit centre line item document.
The requirement is to display the "cost centre" in the account document and profit centre line item document.
when post the hrs. from cats ex.
Person 1 Act1 Cost centre 1 (wehich capture from pe records) which capture the Hrs. which capture the cost from the assigned Nw/activity
Person 2 Act2 Cost centre 1
Person 3 Act3 Cost centre 2
person 1 and 2 need to be consilidated to cost centre 1 and need to display in accounting and profit centre docuement.
person 1 need to be consilidated to cost centre 2 and need to display in accounting and profit centre docuement.
Regards, -
PM order settlement to asset - but I want statistical posting to I/O????
We use internal orders for our capital budgets - we set a plan for the year. We do requisitions against the order which gives us our commitment. We have workflow to upper management to release the requisiton. Once done the req is turned into PO but at this point the account assignment is changed from F to A. When migo and miro are done you can look at the report for the internal order and see a statistical actual posting - valuation type 11. The actual posting capitalized the asset. We can settle PM orders to assets - no problem - but I want to also reference the capital budget internal order in that settlment rule. This will allow me to settle the actual costs and post to the asset but get that statistical actual amount to the internal order. How do I do this? I understand the hierarchy in SAP between cost center, order, and asset. On my settlement rule for the PM order my receiver is fixed asset, but I also put the internal order number in the order field. When I settle with KO88 the cost hits my asset but I get no statistical posting to the internal order. Is it possible?
It's not possbible to get a statistical posting against the I/O from PM order settlement.
-
AIAB Distribution Rule for Settlement Error, "Asset cannot settle to itself"
Hello Everyone,
I have a customer who is getting the "asset cannot settle to itself" error when trying to set up a distribution rule to settle the remaining items of a Line Item Managed AUC to multiple Assets. The Asset numbers and AUC number do NOT match. Here are the steps that have been followed.
Created an Internal Order, #2000####. (1998)
Created the AuC asset. #600####(2011)
Created Settlement Rule (Sender – Internal Order, Receiver - AUC) (2011
Settle Internal Order to AUC.
Create Assets. (2014). #900###1 - #900##99 etc.
Create Settlement Rule (Sender – AUC, Receiver – Multiple Assets) This is where my customer gets the error.
They were able to settle other items from this AuC to Assets last October. It seems very strange to me that the Internal Order was created in 1998 and the AUC was created in 2011 but as I said, this was working at least last October and possibly in March of this year.
Thanks for you help.
RickHello Stacy,
Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner but I just had a major implementation go live on the 2nd so I've been rather busy. I opened a ticket with SAP on this and this is what was found.
Joachim from SAP Support explained that the AUC had been settled to itself last year, that is the posting the program was throwing the error on. My assumption is that we were able to settle AUC's to themselves prior to our March upgrade. This explains the problem and we have a resolution. We are transferring AUCs that this has happened with to a new AUC and then settling the new AUC as usual.
I believe SAP fixed a bug that had previously allowed AUC's to settle to themselves in one of the updates but because this AUC had a record from the past where it settled to itself the program was validating old line items and that is why it throws the error.
Ramnik's suggestion was another option but we didn't want to change the message to a warning because we didn't want anyone to settle an asset to itself.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Rick -
Cost center after settlement in FAGLL03 REPORT
we have process of material issue thru maintennce order. after issuing material FI entry is on respective gl and maintence order
in report fagll03 we can see this combination and then after settlement of cost of order on cost center we are not able to see cost center in report fagll03.
is it possible to get cost center after settlement in this report.
if no then how can we see cost center / gl / material report for maintence orders.You can't able to see the cost center report until settle the maintenance order to cost center with secondary cost element.
after settlement also you can't see in FAGLL03, you can see only cost center report with secundry cost element -
Cost center change in the Asset master record
Hi
When ever cost center changed in the Asset master record, can it possible what ever the dep that is posted to previous cost center,that will automatically transfers to the new cost center,is there any programme for this,i can use repost functionality in controlling,some time many copst centers changes will happen in
our system,so can any tell me how to automate this.
Thanks
LilyHi,
Automatic transfer to new cost center is not possible.
You need to use Distribution or assessment to re allocate the expenses to new cost center.
Regards,
Murali
If it is useful, award points -
Internal Order Down Payment settle to Asset
Hi,
I have a requirement related to Down Payment shows in Order. User want that if there is any down payment against purchase order & purchase order contain real order, they want that FBL1N/FAGLL03 report show Order Number in reports. So that down payment can be traced against Internal Order.
Now I have tested the whole scenario. everything is ok till down payment. I can seen Order number in FBL1N report and also in FAGLL03 report.
Now the problem is here,
Real Internal Order is created which will be settle to AUC asset.
Purchase order is made with Assignment category 'F' . Real Internal Order is mention with GL.
Now Down Payment is made against Purchase Order with mention Purchase Order. I can see in FBL1N report.
Now when i am going to settle Internal Order to asset, there are errors which are rectified by configuring. But when i see AUC asset, down payment is also settle on asset.
If Purchase Order is raised with amount 1500000.
Down Payment is made with amount 50000
when i settle Internal Order 1500000 & 50000 also settle on Asset.
I dont want to settle 50000 on asset and when i see KOB1 report, i only see 1500000 amount.
Or is there any report in which i can extract Order with down payment data. I can develop Z report but i want to do it in standard.
Waiting for reply....
Regards
AJFor Down payment data,
you need to use FBL1N transaction.
probably, down payment will not reflect in internal order. Expense GL with Internal order will reflect in the internal order actual values.
Thanks
Sudhir Krishna Kumar Singh -
Hi Gurus,
We have a requirement of developing WBS costing Report( detailed and summary) in 3.1i version.The specifications considered are as per below.
Actual cost details been captured from relevent POs and Project related Orders aganist WBS, However, for planned cost details, we are finding some discrepancies aganst std, SAP report.
Could you please clarify the following?
How to capture planned cost aganist WBS( ex: POs etc..), what are all the areas need to be covered?
Has anybody developed Z report or the above? if so, please provide the specs/functionality
We had refered relevent SAP std reports ( CJ7M, CJI4) for getting required inputs, but no luck!
Thanks in advance,
KiranHI,
Inorder to get all the actual costs on activity which is actually on WBS. You can do an enhancement. This enhancement should find the all POs against PR which belongs to an activity and will repost the costs that is being posted on WBS on GR to the concerned activity.
Regards,
Anjali -
Report Painter/Writer Ctr & WBS costs
I think I've tried every possible variation to bring the appropriate CTR/WBS costs. Here's what I'm trying to do:
1. See in one reprt both the CTR planned costs and the WBS planned costs where the cost center is assigned to the WBS as a responsible CTR.
2. Added the characteristic "Import CTR Data" into either a row or general data selection as well as adding object types WBS, ACT, PRJ, and CTR.
3. I can get the WBS to display as a line item with the planned costs, but when I do it changes the credit balance on the CTR to a positive value. This is after I run plan reconciliation for the CTR, and I have integrated planning turned on.
Example:
Postings:
WBS Labor CE: $100
CTR Labor CE: -$300
Report:
Total CTR LAbor balalnce $100
WBS displayed with $100.
When I remove the WBS and Import CTR Data i get the $-300 balance on the CTR. So I'm guessing it's not possible to bring these two objects into the same report to show the CTR over/inder absorption with WBS visibility.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
JimCost center...that's the abbrev. used in report painter. As an update the problem seems to stem from the fact that I've added the WBS charateristic to the line and exploded it. when I do this I lose the credits to the cost center. Any idea?
-
CProjects Actual Cost = 0 after Settlement Run
Hi Gurus
After running Transaction CJ8G (Settlement Run), then I log into cProjects, locate my Project and go to the Accounting Tab, I click on Calculate, then Save, then I return to the cProjects Dashboard
When I look at the Actual Costs Value it is zero.
What do I need to do to prevent this from happening?
My overall process is.
Approve Time: CATS_APPR_LITE
Send Confirmed Time to cProjects SE38 - (DPR_CATS_CPR_TRANSF)
Transfer Timesheet Data to Controlling CAT7
Log in to cProjects
Locate the Project in question and go into Accounting
Click on Calculate & Save
Click on Home (Actual Costs > 0)
Generate Settlement Rules CJB1
Execute Settlement Run CJ8G
Log in to cProjects
Locate the Project in question and go into Accounting
Click on Calculate & Save
Click on Home (Actual Costs = 0)
Many Thanks in advance
PandurangaHi Panduranga,
The Badi OLR3_COSTS introduced with the note
1095514 enable you manipulate the costs showed in the dashboard. Please take a look the longtext of the note and implement (very simple) the codes.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo -
Error in Settlement of Asset created to AuC
Hi All,
While settling an asset which was created under AuC I have encountered the following problem:
While running the T-code AIBU the system has given me the following error:
Company code not defined in Asset Accounting
Message no. AA821
Diagnosis
Company code is not defined for Assets Accounting.
Procedure
Define company code via the Customizing menu.
I have maintained all the respective settings. Kindly help me in resolving the error.
Thanks and Regards,
KanupriyaHi
check note 459719, if it solves the problem.
This can occur in the following cases:
1. In Transaction AIAB the settlement rule which should be used to settle a line item received a time limit, that is 'To period' and 'To fiscal' year were entered. If thus the settlement rule is not valid for the current settlement period (posting period) the line item is not settled.
2. You assigned an amount rule to a line item in Transaction AIAB, however, the value 0 was posted in this line item in valuation area 01 (for example, because of the posting with a flow type restricted to valuation areas). In this case, this line item is not settled because an amount rule only refers to valuation area 01.
Solution
Use a valid settlement rule so that the affected line item is settled.
In case 1, remove the to period and to fiscal year from the settlement rule in transaction AIAB. The settlement of a line item should only be controlled by whether a settlement rule is assigned to this line item.
In case 2, use a settlement rule with percent or equivalence number because no amount is settled in valuation area 01.
Regards -
Settlement of Assets under Construction - Error Message
Dear Friends,
In one of the Co, Codes we are using the Category FXA to settle the assets under construction and when we define the Asset No. in the Settlement Receiver, the system gives the error message " Receiver Categ. G/L is not allowed by Settlement Prof. AI for this sendor". Message No. KD031.
It is not understood why the system is referring to the GL when we are putting in the Asset No. as the Settlement Receiver. However, in other Company Code we are not facing this problem. What could be the issue and what do we need to check.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,Hi Raj
posting to Asset, also posts to FI-GL i.e. the recon account.. hence, system might be asking to allow GL
If your settl receiver is FXA, settlement will be made to that only.. Dont worry on that front
Regards
Ajay M -
Validate cost center in settlement rule while creating WO in IW31
Hi All,
I have a requirement to check whether the cost centers in settlement tab is blocked or not. If it is blocked need to give an error.
Is it possible to implement this using an user exit?..
Thanks,
SpandanaHi Chetan,
I agree with you that when PR is created thro repair order the A/C assignment category will be 'F',I am not concerned about that and its a SAP std.I am concerned about the automatic cost center population on the PR created from that order.I'll explain you in detail - It goes like this, We are creating a Service Order in IW31for a material X and this material goes sequentialy in operation which it requires, it depends on the control key SM01 whether the operation is to be processed internally or externally,So when it goes for external processing for which the key SM02 is configured and while saving this order a PR is created from this order and as you said this this PR will have A/c assignment category 'F' and its relevant G/L a/c and the order in it.So if you check the cost center field which is in between this G/L a/c and the order it will not appear as it has to be entered manually.So i need this to be automatically determined.
Hope this clarifies.
Thx
Benny -
Error when settling to asset ko88
Hi
when i am settling to asset the following below is coming
Customizing inconsistency (contact your system administrator)
Message no. AC496
Diagoniss
Company code V100 manages parallel currencies in Asset Accounting. For each area that posts automatically online to FI, you have to define one dependent depreciation area that adopts both identical values and depreciation terms from depreciation area 01, and which is assigned to currency type 60 and currency INR. There is no depreciation area of this type defined for depreciation area 01.
Procedure
Check your Customizing settings.
thanksHi,
Additionally:
The error message AC496 occurred because for company code is defined and additional local currency.
1. You must define exactly one dependent area for each area that is supposed to post automatically online to reconciliation accounts (Tr OB22). However, if you do not wish to have additional currency, you can go to transaction OB22 and remove the additional currency for the company.
2. You have to define this area to take over identical values and parameters ( Tr. OABC).
regards Bernhard
Maybe you are looking for
-
Dual display help for a recently converted mac user
I have a 24" Intel IMac and I wanted to set up dual displays. I may have jumped the gun a little because I didn't do much homework but I found a big cheap monitor at Best Buy which is an HP w2338. I bought that and the mini-DVI to VGA adapter. I hook
-
I Synced two laptops, mostly to transfer several tab groups open in one to the other. While the Sync was in progress, the Options window started to vibrate. After a while, I closed the window and then Firefox. After restarting Firefox, I found that o
-
Hi All, I validated a XML document using Schematron validation, but its not throwing any errors if there is any mismatch between source document and validation document. Source Structure: OrderStats 1 Order 1...unbounded id
-
Question: Singapore and Malaysia not available as an option in First Implementation
Hi, I am going through the available countries during the editing of the project scope in First Implementations and can't find Singapore and Malaysia as options in the list. Please help. Thank you. Liew
-
Battery usage won't display in settings on iPad Air
How can I get my usage since last charge to display in settings on my iPad Air?? I have done a hard reset and really do not want to to do a restore reset as Apple does not know how to fix the problem And that's the only option that they have given me