WBS element is updated while settling cost from WBS to AUC

Hi Experts
At the time of settlement , when we settling the cost from WBS to AUC , WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accounting document , but it should not be updated actually.
As result AUC cost is loaded on WBS and budget of WBS is get affected , furthermore system is not allowing for MIGO even budget is available but in CJ30 it is showing assigned value is more then original budget.
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
shailesh

Hi Saurabh ,
I totally agree with you , but in our case system is not allowing(Error Message: Budget Exceeded) MIGO against capex PO - > WBS.
Note : in our case , system is checking budget at the time of MIGO also.
in our case , report S_ALR_87013558 is showing wrong actual value and also in CJ30 , total assigned value is larger then total distributable budget , As result our available budget gets negative figure in report S_ALR_87013558 , even i have already run CJEN->CJBN 2 or 3 times.
Note: Our Commitment value is correct.
Actually , according to report S_ALR_87013542 , system is showing correct actual value , that means we have sufficient available budget for further MIGO's
Now may be , due to WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accouning document of settlement (WBS to AUC) , system loads AUC values to WBS unnecessarily , our available budget gets negative figure.
For your reference , i am attaching screen shot of accounting document which is generated at the time of settlement from WBS to AUC.

Similar Messages

TX CNS41 - settled cost from internal order to WBS element not displayed

Hi PS Expets,
I have a question regarding transaction CNS41 "Structure Overview" where cost settled from an internal order is not displayed in in the report for a selected project. This is in a ECC version 5.0
Settled costs from internal orders are posted with transaction type KOAO on WBS elements and when you check report RCNSTFCO you can see that the following transaction types are deselected when executing transaction CNS41:
delete t_rpsco_m where vorga = 'KOAO' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAL' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAP' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAQ' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAR'."<   insert
CALL FUNCTION 'HFPM_RPSCO_TO_RPSCO_LIS_CONV'
This is implemented according to OSS note 51971 in order to eliminate internal business volume in the project structure when executing a PS hierarchy report.
But this also eliminate the display of the cost from the internal order.
Any ideas or a work around in order to display settled cost from an internal order on a WBS element in transaction CNS41
Kind regards,
Anne

Hello Tison.
I guess you have the Project created with a BAPI in your system in background. As far as I have seen I'd try the following in ABAP to create Partners in the Project Definition: BAPI_BUS2001_PARTNER_CREATE_M or the corresponding method ProjectDefinitionPI.PartnerCreateMultiple. This should happen in background when the Project is created also.
Best regards.
Jens Schmid

Secondary costs from WBS to an AuC

Hi,
1. I have executed Assessment[KSU5] that actually settled costs from secondary cost element[800099] to a WBS element [AAA]
2. Now I am trying to settle costs [which is secondary] from WBS element [AAA] to an AuC using CJ88 and I am getting below error
3. Just for info in allocation structure Z1, I have given settlement cost element for WBS, but still I am getting below error
Any advises/ideas, thanks
Complete allocation structure Z1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 800099 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 800099 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure Z1
Regards,
Sri
Edited by: Sridhar Nagavarapu on Jul 4, 2008 12:45 AM
Edited by: Sridhar Nagavarapu on Jul 4, 2008 12:47 AM

Through MM, contract is created (ME31N) whereby the settlement G/L accounts are identified.
The contract then is released through MM with TCode ME21N which prompts Commitment Costs to be entered, after which the Service Entry Sheet SES through TCode ME81L which then automatically updates into the WBS.
Through WBS, CJ88 would be the TCode you would have to use for settlement.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.

Error while settling costs to AUC (T.CODE CJ88)

The following error is encountered while settling costs to AUC using
t.code CJ88 with WBS element,
with parameters
with orders
Selection processing type 3 (partial settlement),
period 4,
FY 2008,
selection - with hierarchy, with orders.
Error message is:-
Typ Message text
LTxt
Sender: WBS ASCP.DSCA.CP.NS.DS.003 PLANNO MILLING 4MX2M
Acquisition value negative in area 01.

Hi,
Use T.Code: as02 and click on Depreciation areas, then double click on Depreciation area(example :01 - book dep), there u can select the field allow negative postings allowed. Once this process is completed, remove that indicator.
If u couldn't found that field, then goto screen layout for depreciation area and change status from suprress to optional.
Hope it can resolve ur problem
regards
Prasad

Secondary cost from WBS to AUC

Hi All,
I am facing a problem in posting secondary costs from WBS to AUC.
In Project systems they are considering secondary costs from the activities in the network. i settled the cost from network to WBS. and when i tried to settle From wbs to AUC system is asking for settlement costelement for secondary cost. But the secondary cost should be settled to costcenter but not to AUC.
Please suggest how can we do the settlement from WBS to AUC. How to handle settlement of secondary costs in this scenario.
Any help will be greatly appriciated.
Rgds,
Kumar.

Through MM, contract is created (ME31N) whereby the settlement G/L accounts are identified.
The contract then is released through MM with TCode ME21N which prompts Commitment Costs to be entered, after which the Service Entry Sheet SES through TCode ME81L which then automatically updates into the WBS.
Through WBS, CJ88 would be the TCode you would have to use for settlement.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.

How to find out which WBS Element is assigned to which Cost center?

Hi all,
How to find find out that this WBS element matches this cost Center? I mean, How to find that all these WBS elements are assigned to this cost center? Can you all please give me the corresponding fields and tables? And what are the fields for COST CENTER GROUP and COST ELEMENT GROUP?
Thanking you all in advance,
Chandra sekhar

Hi,
look here:
1) <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/25/908fc66d8411d194f000a0c93031df/frameset.htm">Cost Center Group</a>
2) <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/08/51451143b511d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm">Cost Element Groups</a>
the connection is, when you post a FI-document:
you need a G/L - account and an account assignment
(WBS-Element or cost centre in you case WBS)
this data is put from FI per interface to Controlling:
here you have the cost-element (= G/L account)
and the CO-object
you'll find all combination of cost-elments and co-objects in Table cosp
-> Re: Finding all Cost elements related to a Cost center
pls reward useful answers
Message was edited by: Andreas Mann

Settle Secondary Cost from WBS to AUC

Hi Sapiens,
Business Requirement --> Budget Control for all Material Procurement, thereafter settlement of cost thus booked under WBS to AUC or Asset as the case maybe.
Current Setup --> Material/Inventory/Balance Sheet A/c has been made Statistical i.e. CE category "90". This is enabling AVAC during procurement and budget control. However when trying to settle the WBS it is NOT settling, error - "no cost available to settle".
How to resolve the matters.
Regards,
GM

Here is what SAP help says for cost element category 90:
90: Cost Elements for Balance Sheet Accounts in FI
Automatically assigned when you create cost elements in CO whose general ledger accounts in FI are asset reconciliation accounts (special balance sheet accounts), not income statement accounts. You cannot change this category in CO master data maintenance.
FI does not require CO account assignments to cost elements of category
90. However, if you enter an account assignment, it is only recorded statistically for true objects.
Category 90 cost elements enable you to check the budget of an order or project when you acquire fixed assets that can be directly capitalized. To do this, enter the capital investment order or the WBS element in the corresponding field of the asset master data. Asset Management (AM) ensures that the specified order or WBS element is automatically entered in the document during the asset acquisition.
In CO the order or WBS element is debited statistically. This statistical debiting is checked by the system using the budget during availability control.
Notice the words in bold above. Apparently, CE category 90 is when you acquire fixed assets that can be directly capitalized. You need to specify the WBS element in the corresponding asset master data.
I think your candidate is CE category 22.
22: External Settlement
Used to settle order costs, project costs, or cost object costs to objects outside of CO. These objects could be assets (Asset Management), materials (Materials Management), or general ledger accounts (Financial Accounting). The R/3 System creates an accounting document when the costs are settled.
Cost elements of this category cannot be used for settlement within CO (cost centers, orders, projects, and so on). Use secondary cost element category 21 for this purpose. The system does not create an accounting document when costs are settled within CO.

Move costs from WBS to another

Dear Gurus,
I kindly ask you to tell me how can I move some costs (hour of personnel type of cost S43...) from a WBS on a project to a WBS on another project.
I know I can use KB21N: in that way I have to pull out costs from a WBS though the costs center and then do another movement in order to charge the costs on the WBS receiver always thourgh the cost center.
Is there a way to do it directly?
Thanks a lot!
Sara

S43.. is of type indirect activity allocation,cost element category 43, hence can be used only with reference to activity allocation. Please use any other cost element, be it primary or secondary.
Or else you could cancel the original activity allocation through KB67 and renter through KB21N. You may also want to try reposting of activity allocation posting through KB65.
For number range, go to transaction KANK and enter the controlling area. Then click on Change groups icon on top left. Click on binoculars and search for KAMV (Manual Cost Allocation) This is SAP standard and most likely you will find it.

Real Cost from WBS to Activity

Hi,
We are entering hours using Acct Assgt to a WBS elements by CAT2.
I guess that some settlement or distribution process exists in order to allocate these costs to activities? Could anybody enlighten me or just give me a hint of how it works?
Thanks

KB15N seems a good way but we where looking for something not that manual. I'll try to find how settlement rules work.
About your question, as we have a multilevel WBS structure, we first confirm work at the higher level, (highest WBS of the project), second we distribute these cost along all the activities, and finally to the WBSE of each activity. It might seem a bit crazy, but our customer usually repeats parts of the projects and this seems the only way to record the actual cost of each of these parts.
Thanks

WBS element not updating in additional data of IW32

Hello, We have created a sales order with account assingment as WBS element. From this line service order will be created, but when we check the service order additional data, the wbs element field is showing as blank. What is the reason for this.

AbhayDev,
Please Let us know your observation and Solution
Babu

Tc kb11n to repost costs from wbs to another wbs

I have some expenditures occured during year of 2010 to transfer to project XXX, then capitalized them.
I have the order yyyy (assigned to wbs 9999) need to post to wbs 8888
I tried to use tc KB11N:
- scrn var: wbs element/order
-input type: individual entry
then I insert:
-cost element
- old account assigment (order and wbs)
- new account assigmnet (same order and new wbs)
but i have this warning:
Assignment to project/network is not permitted for order yyyy
(because the given statistical order is assigned to a project > I saw it in tc KO03)
this means that I can't repost these expenditures?
how can I fix it?
I try to ignore the warning and I push enter. at this point I have this error:
WBS element 888 (the new wbs) is not an account assignment element
can anybody help me please?
thanks
V.

S43.. is of type indirect activity allocation,cost element category 43, hence can be used only with reference to activity allocation. Please use any other cost element, be it primary or secondary.
Or else you could cancel the original activity allocation through KB67 and renter through KB21N. You may also want to try reposting of activity allocation posting through KB65.
For number range, go to transaction KANK and enter the controlling area. Then click on Change groups icon on top left. Click on binoculars and search for KAMV (Manual Cost Allocation) This is SAP standard and most likely you will find it.

Project setup, WBS element mgmt, user status, settlement

What is Project setup, WBS element mgmt, user status and settlement

If you are after the definitions, the simplest way would be to go to SAP Help.
If you're after the transaction code, it's CJ20N which is the Project Builder screen.

Wbs element number changing in easy cost planning

Hi ps guies
I m facing a strange problem in ps.
I create a structure in project bulider.after that when switch to easy cost palnning ,the top wbs number changes to another number which i dont know from where it is coming.
This happens only with top wbs ,rest of the numbers are same as i created.
it is happining in only easy cost planning ,and in rest of the transactions it is fine.
please suggest ur thoughts
regards
shashank

Hi...
what about..using item category E :Internal Activity.
You need to have defined activity types per Person ex T1000 for John W1, T1001 for Mike W2 etc.
Also you need to have defined planned rates in KP26 for each one of the activity types.
This way you can use ECP for each activity type (therefore employee) and use their own rates.
Hope it helps
Pan

Error 8 In Update,while doing transport from sandbox to Dev.

Hi All,
I am trying to transport some 100 queries from sandbox to development. I made a 10 queries in a single request and transported it from sandbox to development.First 6 transports went fine.(means 60 queries with out any issues).next 4 transport request ended with the Error 8 in update.
R3TRELEM42NJZNEBP9QAAI6BSCUZI8CYG original object cannot be replaced
R3TRELEM42NJZNEBP9QAAI6BSCUZI8CYG was not imported in this step
Start import R3TRELEM42NJZNM088BZT4PRY6XBSABO8 ...
R3TRELEM42NJZNM088BZT4PRY6XBSABO8 original object cannot be replaced
R3TRELEM42NJZNM088BZT4PRY6XBSABO8 was not imported in this step
Start import R3TRELEM42NJZNTOR6XPBR9840ZO2CAE0 ...
R3TRELEM42NJZNTOR6XPBR9840ZO2CAE0 original object cannot be replaced
R3TRELEM42NJZNTOR6XPBR9840ZO2CAE0 was not imported in this step
Start import R3TRELEM42NJZO1DA5JEUDSO9V20CE93S ...
R3TRELEM42NJZO1DA5JEUDSO9V20CE93S original object cannot be replaced
R3TRELEM42NJZO1DA5JEUDSO9V20CE93S was not imported in this step
Can you please give ur valuable Suggestion Please.
Thanks.
Srinivas

Try re-importing the transports with the following import options:
1) Overwrite Originals
2) Overwrite Objects in Unconfirmed Repair

Stastical Costs on WBS in result analysis

Dear Gurus,
At my client scenario, I am using valuated project stock. Normally in case of valuated project stock, actual cost does not get updated on WBS element at the time of good receipt from PO account assigned to WBS Element.
But I referred SAP note 533207 to achieve actual cost on WBS Element.
As per note, I have created cost element with category 90 for Balance sheet GL account (called at the time of good receipt).
Due to this, at the time of goods receipt, statistical cost gets posted on WBS Element and seen as actual cost on WBS Element reports (This is solving our reporting requirement).
But when I run result analysis (KKA2) on partiular WBS Element, system does not consider this actual cost (stastical cost posted on WBS Element).
It seems system is not considering statistical costs on WBS Element in result analysis (KKA2).
Is there any way to achieve this (consideration of stastical costs on WBS Element in result analysis)
Thanks and Regards,
Parimal

Hi All,
Thanks for your replies....I also appreciate that stastical cost can not be considered as actual cost in result analysis.
But in case of valuated project stock, if stock is available for WBS Element and not issued to production order or any other receiver, under which category the value of WBS stock is to be shown in result analysis.
Is there any other period end function to be carry out specifically for stock valuation or
how to represent it in results of project period end procedures

WBS element is updated while settling cost from WBS to AUC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for