WBS settlement issue:Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503
hi all
I created an WBS 600041 and through FB60 posted the JV by assigning the WBS 600041.
Then I saw in CJI3 the posting is done and it is showing there and I created a settlement rule and gave the 100 % cost settlement on AUC and saved it. Now when I go to CJ88 and do the actual settlement and gave all the parameters for full settlement and execute it is giving the following error
Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503
Is this problem due to cost elements? How do I go about it.please suggest.
kind regards
Aman
HI,
Check your allocation structure OKO6 transaction. see whether your allocation structure is having the expense cost element you posted listed in it
OKO6- select your allocation structure-Assignments-source
Here the GL account should be listed
Regards,
Radha
Similar Messages
-
Complete allocation structure Z4 Message no. KD503
Complete allocation structure Z4
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 90001000 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z4, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 90001000 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure Z4
Please help resolve error below.
What do I need to reverse?
Is there a different way to enter actual cost for this?
What do you think is missing in my allocation structure?Hi paul
This error message you are getting KD503
This message comes up at the time of settlement of the order when you are transferring the cost from on cost object to the other. Here you are giving the final cost settlement on the asset so the final asset is where all the cost is going to get settle for the cost which you have taken in the internal order. you have to define a roadmap for the cost elements which is carrying the cost from the IO to the final asset.
The resolution Is do the following: go to KO88 and explore the juke box where you have booked all the jv take note of all those cost elements now come to KSES and here under Z4 allocation structure give CO area and go to source tab and give the range of cost elements that you have used in ko88 and save it
This will resolve your issue.
Kind regards
Arman
SAP FICO -
Complete allocation structure 60 (message # kd503)
Hi,
I am facing this error message while doing Settlement of Internal Orders and the solution provided by SAP is not possible because instead of reversing the posting, it was reclassified by users and now the settlement is not possible and the recommendation also does not apply here.
What alternatives there are?
Regards
Roger> If you do not want to change the allocation
> structure,
> Write a jorunal entry to make the books correct and
> close the order to future activity.
> We use this process as a clean up step of last resort
> .
>
> Althea
Hello, Althea.
Could you advise step-by-step process for this?
As I understand it should look the following way:
1) Do G/L posting from Project Account to AuC
2) Close PO (how it can be done?)
3) Create new PO for WBS
4) Run settlement
Am I correct? If PO was closed, does settlement run do not check its postings and do not return errors KD503? -
While Doing Production Order Settlement "Complete Allocation structure" :
Dear Experts
I am Getting This Problem ,
please give me A suitable Solution.
I am created Another Allocation Structure And Assigned to Settllement Profile . But it is not trigering. Not Capturing That allocation
Complete allocation structure Z1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 40512006 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
u2022 If the posting under cost element 40512006 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
Edited by: rajamallu on Jul 2, 2010 10:41 AMHi,
within allocation structure customizing you create assignments for allocation structure Z1.
Each assignment has a source (cost element, cost element range, cost element group).
The cost element 40512006 is not included in the source definition of allocation structure Z1 but there are values to be settled available on your sender.
Thus they cannot be settled and thats why the message occurs. So maintain alloc. structure Z1 completely.
Best regards, Christian -
Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1 for Internal Order
Hi,
During Internal order settlement through KO88 I am getting this error as :
Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1
Diagnosis :
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters). Cost element 430500 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure K1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure :
Possible solutions are as follows:
o If the posting under cost element 430500 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
o If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose
"Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure. If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
- You can update allocation structure K1
The same configuration in Development Server there is no error but problem occurs in Quality server. Here the process is Internal Order creation - Creation of Reservation through MB21- Goods Issue against reservation through MB1A and finally settlement through KO88. During settlement this error occur. In configuration setting of allocation structure under Internal Order I have mentioned only revenue settlement (as per business) against assignments. Under source mentioned cost element group and under settlement cost elment Receiver Cat is "CTR" and tick "By Cost Element".
During MB1A i.e, goods issue accounting entry is generated as
81(Dr). 430500 Constimptuion Saprae and Stores
99(Cr). 310411 Inventory Machinery and Spare.
During settlement this debit figure should credit. But not allowiing to credit. Even in configuration under settlement cost element if I remove the tick of "By cost element" and mention secondary gl account whose cost element category is 21, still showing the same error in QA server. What may be the probabale solution ? Even if i remove allocation structure K1 from settlement profile 20 still same error exist. How this link gets during settlment inspite of removing allocation structure from settlement profile...
NB.. COPA is not implemented in our company. So PA structure should not arrise here....
Thanks & regards,
Samrat
Edited by: Samrat Roy on Aug 30, 2010 7:28 PMHi Samrat,
The issue is very simple.. Cost element 430500 is posted in your IO...
While settling you have 2 options... Either you can credit the original GL account 430500.. This happens when you tick "By Cost element".. This you have done already...
2nd option is not to tick "By Cost element" and assign a secondary cost ele category 21...
But for any of these options to work, you have to include GL 430500 in the "source"... The above 2 options apply only to those GL accounts which are mentioned in the "Source".... for rest of the GL accounts, system gives this error
Include 430500 in your "source" cost ele group.. Error will be resolved
Regards
Ajay M -
Complete Allocation Structure A1
Hi everyone,
I have a problem concerning settlement of orders. Running transaction va88 gives me an error message stating that I should complete allocation structure a1. However, this is not the allocation structure I want to use. The message says that I can assign a different allocaton structure to the sender by chosing Settlement Rule --> Goto --> Settlement Parameters in the master data of the sender.
Now my question is where to find the master data of the sender!? Thanks for your help!
Regards,
MartinHi,
I have solved this issue now. Changed the allocation structure. Now I still have one problem concerning an account which is not maintained in the strucutre. However, to assign this cost element to the right part of the structure is something my controlling people have to figure out.
Thanks anyway for all you help.
Regards,
martin -
Complete Allocation Structure A1 in K088
Every month end, we settle IO unused supplies to inventory accounts (using KO88) but last July 2011 until today, system prompts this error: "Complete Allocation Structure A1"? Can anyone please help me resolve the error? Upon checking the settlement allocation structure, the master data and parameters seems all accurate. Please help resolve this issue. Thank you all in advance.
hi Gracey
your error msg. must be showing some cost element missing in the allocation structure.
Kindly maintain the same in A1...
Check the link below
Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1 for Internal Order
Regards,
Divraj -
We are getting the following error "Complete allocation structure GA"
Hi,
Please help on the below issue:-
We are carrying settlement of order (Period end activities ) for CO88 . We are getting the following error complete allocation structure GA.
Please guide us.
Regards
SrinivasHi,
Go to Allocation structure and maintain the Source and Settlement cost element for various cost groups in the structure.
And maintain this Allocation Structure in the settlement profile for your Production/Process orders.
Regards
Balaji -
Error : complete allocation structure while doing Ko88 settlement.
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element S10100 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A2, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element S10100 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure A2Dear,
Please refer my reply in this thread,
Error in Rework order settlement
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
KO88 - message KD503 'Complete allocation structure ZD'
Hello,
Need some help regarding settlement error KD503 a user is getting via KO88. User made posting to an incorrect primary cost element (611010). That cost element is NOT included in the allocation structure and it should not be included. The user reversed out the incorrect posting and tried to settle the IO. The KO88 transaction still yields KD503 error. Any ideas what the problem is?
Both transactions were made in currency 'SGD'. When running S_ALR_87012993 to check line item total for 611010 in IO, balance is 0 in 'SGD' but $.06 in CO area currency. Would this be causing the issue?
I'd appreciate your immediate help! I've attached files in case it helps.Hi Mathew
Nice to be talking to you again
The balance of .06 is not the issue.. You posted a line item in the IO... And then reversed it
So, from system's point of view, it has 2 line items in the IO to be settled..
You will have to include this cost element temporarily in your allocation structure, as a formality.. Once the settlement is done, you can remove it again
Include this Cost ele under any assignment in your allocation structure.. Impact would be null because the 2 line items nullify each other
Br. Ajay M -
Error In allocation Structure when doing settlement to GL from WBS
Hi All,
I got this error message. What should i do? I try to check my allocation structure...but it seem correct.
Complete allocation structure Z3
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 901000 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z3, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 901000 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure Z3Hi Sreenivas ,
The accounting document looks weird :
Hi,
Settlement profile : ZPS001
GL, CC, Order, WBSE and FXA optional
Document type : SA (GL Account doc)
Distribution rule : 10
Residence time : 24
Allocation strucutre Z3
Default object type : FXA
tick on % settlement and equivalence no
to be settled in full
Allocation structure : Z3
Assignment : 1.Labour ,2.MAterial, 3. Subcontract
Source : 1. PSlabour , 2.PSmaterial 3. PSsubcon 4.Cost
Settlement cost center : FXA (ticl by CE), CTR (settlement cost element 90200) ; ORD (Settlement cost element 902001); GL put 747100f
I already successfully settle from WBS to GL 747100(settlement receiver) However, when i check FB03 it shows that
GL account 747100
Posting key 40
Amount 25000
GL Account 747100
Posting key 50
Amount -25000
What the problem ?
Cheers,
Nies -
Hi,
When we execute the T.code KO88(Order Settlement for AUC), showing the below Error Message.
Complete allocation structure A1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 410006 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 410006 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure A1
We have assigned Cost element for Receiver Cat. FXA.
What is the Problem?
Thanks in advanceIn the allocation structure you need to include the source CE 410006.
Allocation Structure>Assignments (double click)>Source (double click)
Here in source you should have the CE mention in From else you should have created a CE group including this CE.
And now for this source ensure you've maintained the Settlement cost element (for FXA) either 'By Cost Element' or Settlement cost element.
Regards
Sreenivas -
Allocation Structure in CO Assignment Settlement Missing
Hi,
Pls help i am facing an issue to allocation Structure in CO Assignment Settlement while CO88
For referance error massage no. KD506. i got to know i need to assign the cost elements but where and which ? That help i need from experts with bit more understandable. If possible document with screenshots is help to get resolve the issue.
Thanks in advance.
Milind JoshiHi...
if you double-click on the message it will show you what are the cost elements that are not assigned yet.
You need to access the allocation structure you use (it should be in the error message) and proceed with adding the respective cost element to complete the settlement. (transaction OKO6->pick allocation structure)
Hope it helps.
Panagiotis
ps...in case you still have issues could you write down the entire message as it appears when you double click on it? -
Hi SAP,
I am having a problem to make settlement for Work Order. i have created a new Cost Element (90500014) but system does not allow the Work Order to be settled. Is there any configuration i have to do (SPRO)? eg: OKO6 and OKO7. If yes, how? since i have no experience in this Txn.
Btw, i received error message (NA KD503) Short text - Complete allocation structure MK.
Promise will give points for those who help me out.
TQ
Regards,
NazrulHi,
Yes, you need to maintian the created cost element as source in OKO6 or in OKEU.
Hope this helps.
Rewards points if useful.
Regards,
Harish -
Hi PS Experts,
I am faced a lots of issue in settling the project cost.
I am able to run the transaction code CJ88 successfully.
But when I checked CJI3 Report, The project cost is not changed to "ZERO". (Project cost is same)
I don't know from where the below Cost element is captured in the CJI3 Report.
I have attached the screenshot settlement Profile and allocation structure.
Request you to let us know how to settle the project cost to "ZERO" in CJI3 report and settle all the cost to AUC,as I am doing settlements for the first time.
Regards,
Wasim.Hello,
Line item reports pull all postings as actual, settlement & statistical, so have you tried to exclude the statistical cost from the report selection and run the report? You can exclude the statistical cost using filter function on the output screen.
2nd thing check whether cost is showing in CJI3 after settlement is not that manual posting to asset if yes then reverse those entry and go though CJ88 then check CJI3 you will get expected result.
Regards,
Sanjeev
Maybe you are looking for
-
DBMS_DATAPUMP how to fetch completed_rows
Hi, we are using data pump api to copy partition data to dump file. we need to fetch completed_rows (row count) for partition status monitoring. record count get generated in log file but we need to parse it again. i refer below url [http://download.
-
hi, i have a a data file and a control file as follows data file(data.txt) 7782, "Clark", "Manager", 7839, 09-June-1981 7839, "King", "President", , 17-November-1981 7934, "Miller", "Clerk", 7782, 23-January-1982 7566, "Jones", "Manager", 7839, 02-Ap
-
[Mac] "Invalid Param" bug on Open: Solved?
Just saw this in the latest 10.6.3 update: resolve an issue that prevented files with the # or & characters in their names from opening in Rosetta applications I never have had this particular problem can someone who *has* confirm it's solved?
-
Wondows 8.1 to 10?
Hi folks i have a quetion, i have just orderd a gt72 dominator and it will arrive on wensday i hope, and i have seen windows offers 8.1 to upgrade tp 10 for free so im thinking windows 10 cant be worse then 8.1 but nothing beats windows 7 but i thin
-
Upgrade NW7.0(Java Only) to NW7.1 CE/NW7.2 CE
Hi, Does anybody know if there are any tools(SAPINST,JUP, etc.,) available in SMP(service market place) for upgrading NW7.0(Java Only) to NW7.1 CE/NW7.2 CE? Thanks, regards, Krishna