Wbs settlement to cost center

Hi Gurus,
We have project sysyem, FI and cost and profit center accounting.
We are booking cost and revenue on wbs and then we are settling it to cost center.
Do we really need to settle to cost center what is the need and what is the correct process???
Thank you

Hi Mohit
It is against SCN's rules to post the same discussion thread twice. You have already posted a similar question in the below thread. Please refrain from doing this and close one of the threads.
Initial balance upload of revenue GL accounts with wbs
Regards
Sowmya

Similar Messages

Parameter id for wbs element or cost center

Hi all,
Iam designing a alv report where I should provide drill down details of the po when we double click on PO number.It is possible by calling the transaction ME23N. But I need to know whether I can do the same thing for the WBS element and Cost center number. User is asking to provide link for the WBS element and also for cost center number. When we double click on this , is there any possibility to display the WBS element details and same way for cost center

hi
good
go through these link
http://sapdocs.mit.edu/gui_help/dontindex/pdf/basss.pdf
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/5a/567f65cbf211d295a500a0c93089fd/content.htm
thanks
mrutyun^

Plant maintenance order settlement to cost center

Hi,
I have a requirement from the client that PM order costs should be settled to Cost center (real) and credit the order line with statistical cost center.
1. Consumables GL is debited at the time of goods issue with refrence to PM order , cost center is not updating in this line item
2. Settlement rule maintained as cost center receiver which is mentioned in the PM order and after settlement consumables GL is getting credited with Order and debit to cost center mentioned in settlement rule , statistical cost center is not updating in credit line
My client requirement is
Statistical cost center should update along with Maintenance order at the time of goods issue for consumables GL (Debit)
Statistical cost center should update along with maintenance order at the time of settlement for PM order (Consumables GL credit with statistical cost center and maintenance order and the same GL debit with settlement receiver cost center (real)).
If i provide cost center in account assignment at the time of Goods issue , system is updating the cost center along with order , however at the time of settlement both cost center and order are not updating in credt line item and the cost is lying in the order without settling.
Please advise any configuration setting or user exit to meet the above requirement.
Thanks,
Sreedhar

Hi Ravi,
Thanks for the update.
If i give the cost center in acct assignment in MB1A it is taking , is there is any option to default the cost center either from PM order or thru some other setting.
I have tried both substitution and OKB9 , however system is not defaulting the cost center from this settings.
Please let me know if there is any other option to default the cost center in MB1A.
Thanks,
Sreedhar P

Settlement receiver (cost center) for an PM order

Hi Gurus,
In which table I can find the settlement receiver (cost center) for an PM order??
Thanks.

Settlement distribution rules are stored in table COBRB.
Regards
Sreenivas

Settlement to cost center posted for statistical WBS element

We have the following scenario
Statistical WBS elements with assigned Cost center posted for actual postings
Network assigned to statistical WBSE and settlement rule on the same WBSE
On settlement run CJ88 the network costs are transferred from network to Cost Center posted in the WBSE.
Issue:
While analysing the active availability control the assigned value is doubled. This happens only of the networks are settled. System considers the Actual values from network + Statistical value from WBSE to caculate the assigned values.
Simulation details as under.
SP-SET-02-3 (wbs element)
    COSS 2011 11 0007101000     0001240704 KOAO D INR                 100.00 INR
    NWA 500000002408 0010
        COSS 2011 04 0007101000     0001240704 KOAO O INR                 100.00- INR   S -- does not contribute to assigned value
        COSP 2011 04 0007101000     0001240704 COIN D INR                 100.00 INR
        COSP 2011 01 0007101000     0001240704 KPPP D INR                 100.00 INR   M   -- does not contribute to assigned value
Hence the assigned value gets doubled and eating up the budget.
Anyone encountered similar issues pls share the possible solutions.

Hi Mohit
It is against SCN's rules to post the same discussion thread twice. You have already posted a similar question in the below thread. Please refrain from doing this and close one of the threads.
Initial balance upload of revenue GL accounts with wbs
Regards
Sowmya

KO88 - Error when settling for Cost Center AND Auc for the same Internal Or

Hi Experts,
We need to configure Investment Internal Orders that could settle to both Cost Center and Auc, but each assignments with different Source Cost Elements
We did the following:
1. Created Auc Class
2. Created Investment Profile "IMOBIL" and assigned to Auc Class, flagging Auc
3. Created Allocation Structure "CV" with two assignments:
01, Source = Cost elements 7000000000 to 7999999999, receiver AUC "by cost element"
02 Source = Cost elements 4000000000 to 4999999999, receiver CTR "by cost element"
4. Created Model Order, filling the Investment Profile IMOBIL created in step 2.
5 Created Settlement Profile ZCV0001, assigning Allocation Strucutre CV, allowing CTR and AUC for receivers, default receiver is "FXA", doc type "AA".
6 Created ORder Type CV01, assigning Settlement Profile ZCV0001.
When I post only for Asset Expenses (Source Cost element 7, Assigment 01), the settlement through KO88 correctly settles to AUC, and also creates the settlement rule for cost center (i'm using the strategy to create from Responsible Cost Center).
But when I post for Asset Expenses (cost elements 7, receiver AUC) AND General Expenses (Source Cost element 4, receiver CTR), KO88 generates an error KD506, saying that for Assigment 02 - AUC I didnt define a settlement cost element.
1. Assignment 02 is not AUC, is CTR;
2. I flagged "by cost element", so I don't need a settlement cost element. And also, I was able to post to AUC when the source posting was only for cost element 7.
Did you face any problem like this?
I cannot find out what is the missing configuration, or if it is a program error...
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

Hi Ajay
I already created Source Structure and assigned to my Setllement profile (so I assigned Allocation Structure AND Source Structure).
I don't understand when you say that I need to assign the Source Sutrcture in each rule....because the Source structure is in the Settlement Parameters valid for both rules...
When I post to Asset Expenses only for the internal Order, the 2 rules (CTR and AUC) are created when I run KO88 (but only AUC rule is settled). This is OK.
The problem is when I post for both General Expenses AND Asset Expenses, the system is not recognizing that I have 2 source structures, neither is findind that for CTR AND AUC the Settlement cost elements are the original cost elements.
I'm thinking about changing message KD506 to warning, do you know if this can help?
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

Process order settlement to cost center

Hi,
We have a requirement to settle only the quantity to material and the costs to
cost center from the process orders. This is to ensure the materials are
handled as non-valuated and the COGM is computed from the goods consumption
postings.
The process orders will have both co products and by products as well.
There is also one more requirement to allow Purchase orders against the non-
valuated materials.
I am planning to propose the following :-
1) To make the materials valuated but set the standard price to zero to give
the effect of non-valuated materials and at the same time can also raise
purchase orders because otherwise non-valuated materials cannot be used to
raise Purchase orders.
2) When goods receipt happens from the process order the actual costs of the
process order will remain as it is in the process order since the standard
price of the FG is zero and only the quantity will be received into inventory.
3) When process order settlement happens the full actual costs will be settled
to a price difference account and cost center tied to the price difference
account.
Do you guys see any flaws in the above design?
Edited by: FICO Consultant on Feb 21, 2012 4:28 AM

Answered

WBS element and Cost Center

Hi Gurus,
As far as I know, when the a/c assignment category is P in a PO, the costs are assessed on the cost object WBS element and when the a/c assignment category is K in a PO, the costs are assessed on the cost object cost center. But, as I drill down a WBS element, I find Requesting and responsible cost center.
So, can I say that a WBS element is actually a child of the responsible cost center ?
And all the costs assessed on a WBS element are eventually assessed on the responsible cost center?
Please help in clearing my concepts.
Thanks,
Kumar

hi,
You assign the account assignment to WBS element based on the OPERATIVE INDICATOR...
By this you specify the attributes of a WBS element and determine which tasks the WBS element can carry out in the project...
Please check the LInk given for futher explainations:
[WBS ELEMENT|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/4c/225e2a46e611d189470000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
check the table given at the bottom...
Regards
Priyanka.P

PP Order settlement at Cost Center

Hi! Gurus,
We have peculiar requirement of settleling PP order at Cost center, client is asking for correct cost center to be pop up as settlement receiver.
moreover we can not remove default receiver(material) otherwise it won't allow GR.
Now the thing, is there any means by which we can populate settlement receiver as "particular" cost center during the order creation, as second line item?
OR
Is there anymeans to put validation, as if correct Cost center would not be selected it will terminate Order creation?
Looking forword expert advice.
Regards,
Asheesh

Hi Ambi ash,
To achieve this you have to activate a user exit/form exit & substitutions in CO module. Your CO Consultant should be able to help you out.
Thanks & regards
Mahesh babu

Settlement of Cost Center And Production Order Variance

Dear All
I have just started to learn SAP Controlling. I am able to get hold of some materials on Controlling. May I request the experenced forum memebers to please explain the following
1. How data flows from FI to CO and PA
2. When cost center and production orders are settled, how the variance are settled and which accounts/ modules get effected
and a source where I can get some material on this topic. Your immediate replies and valuable peice of advice will help me a lot
Thanks
Arvindh

Dear All
I have just started to learn SAP Controlling. I am able to get hold of some materials on Controlling. May I request the experenced forum memebers to please explain the following
1. How data flows from FI to CO and PA
2. When cost center and production orders are settled, how the variance are settled and which accounts/ modules get effected
and a source where I can get some material on this topic. Your immediate replies and valuable peice of advice will help me a lot
Thanks
Arvindh

PM Order Settlement to Cost Center(real) & Internal Order simultaneously

Dear Experts.
I have a request from client to settle 100% of PM order to Cost Center (real) and internal order (statistical) simultaneously. The purpose of statistical orders is to capture all the expenses (electricity, water, security charges, maintenance, etc...) location-wise.
PM Order settlement through statistical IO will contribute to the maintenance aspect, and other expenses will be captured to statistical IO through financial GL posting. Hence each location will have a unique statistical order maintained.
In the settlement Profile, I have maintained Order and Cost Center elements as "Settlement Optional" Under "Valid receivers". But the system doesn't allow this settlement. As per my understanding SAP allows settlement (100%) to go only to a single object.
Appreciate your inputs on this matter.
Thanks,
thushantha.

hi,
Please check how you maintained the real object in the settlement rule.
You must maintain both the cost center and internal order on the same assignment line such as:
CAT:     Settlement receivers
ORD      ORD_Number   Cst_Center_number         100%   PER
The system will correctly generate KI178 if you have the following:
CAT:     Settlement receivers
ORD      ORD_Number                              100%   PER
CTR      Cst_Center_number                       100%   FUL
regards
Waman

Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail. When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######. Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as KSB1.
I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center. Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center? Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
Thanks,
Jeff

Thanks Christian,
We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element" checked. Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
For example:
expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250. The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000. When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000. We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000 and $250, $250 to 600000.
Thanks,
Jeff

Report Painter Request - Cost Center and WBS Element

Hi Everyone,
Currently, my company settles all project related expenses through to a cost center by way of an internal settlement cost element (category 21). The issue with this is that when the expense gets to the cost center, they lose all visability as to where the expense originated, such as salaries or travel expense (category 1 cost elements). We can't switch the settlements to the originating cost element from wbs to cost center just because of the additional data/volume that will cause. My thought was to create a report painter that can run by cost center but also show the wbs's that settle to that cost center and group the expenses by primary cost element (cat 1). I'm assuming that there is a way to marry a cost center and wbs element by way of the wbs settlement rule but how would that be done for reporting purposes? I've seen it done before by way of a nightly job that created sets based on the combination of cost center and wbs but I'm not sure how that was done. Any advise and examples?
Example:
Cost Center: IT
WBS: A.0017.01.01 (settles to cost center IT)
Postings made:
1. CC IT and CE 552000 "salaries"..............................$20,000
2. WBS A.0017.01.01 and CE 552000 "salaries"........... $5,000
3. Settlement of WBS to CC (expenses flow through to CC IT by way of CE 985000)
I want to run CC IT and see that the account 552000 really shows $25,000 and can be broken down by cost object (CC and WBS by the amounts above)
Thanks,
Pete

Hi Peter,
I had a similar requirement and used report painter report group 1SHK-002 (in library 1VK).
I took a copy of the standard and ameneded it slightly, I switched the explode so it occured on the cost center not cost element.
The report runs so that direct costs on the cost center are shown at primary cost level. And values settled to the cost center are shown on the partner object. In your case i guess WBS Elements (Partner ObjType WBS).
Now in my case I didnt need cost element breakdown on partner level, just on cost center so effectively I have(sorry for text alignment but I hope you get the idea):
GL1   ............. 100
GL2   ............. 250
+ Cost center1 total ....350
GL3 .............   50
GL4 ............. 100
+ Cost center2 total.... 150
Primary Cost Total ..... 500
X-YZ-1.200 .............   50
X-YZ-1.400 ............. 100
+ WBS total ............. 150
IO 1............. 100
IO 2 ............. 100
+IO total ............. 200
Partner Total............. 350
Overall total ............. 850.
Its not exactly like your requirement but it might be a good report for you to work with to get what you need.
Elaine

Cost center & statistical wbs -ECC 6.0

Hi,
We are using statistical wbs with real postings to cost center. Need to know what report or which table we should use that gives both the cost center & WBS no at line item level in ECC 6.0.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Vipin

Hi,
I tried using these reports but not able to see the wbs element with cost center Is any specific settings that we need to maintain to view this like layout ot any config.
Thanks
Vipin

Settle part of production order to cost center

When settling a production order, the balance of some accounts in the production order should be settled to a certain cost center (the rest of the order balance settle to material). The requirement is to settle the balance amount while settlement rule in a production order only allows settle by percentage or amount. Please let me know if there is any solution. Thanks~

Hi Sharon
I dont know if this would be possbile because a Prod Order created for a Valuated Mat will always have MAT as settlement receiver
however, give a try as below
1. In your Settlement Profile - Assign a Source Structure
2. In the Source Str - Create 2 Assignments, say, 10 & 20
10 - Include all the Cost elements which should settle to Cost Center... Specify
20 - All others which should settle to MAT
3. In your allocation structure, allow both CTR/MAT as allowed receivers
4. While creating settlement rule in Prod Order - Create 2 settlement rules
a. In One settlement rule, Choose the Source Str Assignment 10 and Specify Cost Ctr as Settlement Receiver
b. In 2nd settlement rule, this will be auto generated by the system to MAT... Choose the Source Str Assgn 20 here
Br, Ajay M

Wbs settlement to cost center

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for