Wbs settlement to upper level WBS

Hello,
I have 4 level WBS .
all the expenses are settled at the 2 nd level.
so is there any way where i can determine that the cost of 4th level is to be settled at the 3rd and the cost of 3rd is to settled at the second to which i have give the settlement rule.
Waiting for response.
Regards
Vijay.

Refer the link below:
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/ModificationnoteforStrategyforsettlementtosuperiorWBS
Regards
Sreenivas

Similar Messages

  • DMR Not showing materials of Lower level WBS

    Hi,
    I have multiple WBS under 1st level. It is working find with cost reporting. But when i create DMR with DP91, it shows materials attached with activity comes under 1st level WBS only. How can i bring materials of lower level WBS activity materials into DRM while triggering DP91 with Upper level WBS...?

    Hi rajsekhar
    But generally if you want to transfer the cost of the sub item to  main item then you can  check the box Cumulative cost in copy control VTFL . But your requirement is quite opposite .So you need to go to assign a New Reqt / Alt calc type  to the cond type , telling that the header item cost which is not relevant for pricing has to be transferred to sub item .So you need to integrate with the ABAP'er to give inputs to him and giving our requirement also
    Regards
    Srinath

  • IM-PS  top WBS settle to AUC

    Dear all experts,
    could you help me on the following issue?
    i am working on a capital project. IM and PS modules are used.
    my key users want to settle lower WBS to the superior WBS and the top WBS to one AUC when they do the monthly settlement.
    i delete the IM profile in the lower WBS, and maintain the settlement rule of them.
    when i do the settle i found that lower WBS settle to the superior WBS but the top WBS doesn't settle to AUC
    could you tell me what's the problem.
    Judy

    sorry, i didn't mean to close the question, as the problem is still there.
    here is what i am.
    AUC is created automatically when i release the project.
    if i didn't delete the IM profile, all the WBS including the top one will be settled to AUC individually.
    but if i delete the IM profile of lower WBS and maintain the settlement rule manually, the lower WBS will be settled to the top WBS. but the top one will not be settled to AUC that is created automatically.
    the settlement type is not AUC,but GES.
    i don't think it is correct.
    could someone offer me some help or suggestions?
    did someone meet the same problem?
    thanks in advance.
    Judy

  • Error: Maintain settlement rule of the sender for a higher level WBS

    Hi,
    I dont want to maintain the settlement rule for a higher level WBS. How can i configure this in such a way that i dont get the following error:" Maintain settlement rule of the sender" while doing CJ88. Maintaing a separate Settlement profile for a higher level WBS is an option but we are looking if something else could be done The problem is that there are no actuals booked against, say, level 2 WBS but when i execute CJ88, i get the aforesaid error. How can i ensure that only the lowest level WBS ask for the settlement rule and not the levels above it. I have already removed the Investment profile from the higher level WBS but still getting the same error.
    Regards,
    DPil

    Hi,
    It is a type Capex WBS and Biling element is not checked. In fact i get a warning while doing the settlement: WBS is neither a billing element nor an account assignment element.
    Diagnosis
    WBS element  is not indicated as either an account assignment element or as a billing element in the master record.
    System Response
    The WBS element cannot be assigned to an account.
    Procedure
    Correct your entries or add the missing indicator to the master record for the WBS element.
    But this is just a warning. On pressing enter i get the error :Maintain settlement rule of the sender "

  • Settlement Run on Higher Level WBS

    Hello Experts,
    Scenarios is that I need to run settlement on 2nd Level WBSE where I have assigned asset class but my activities are linked on 3rd OR 4th Level WBS Elements due to the requirement of detailed level project planning. Cost is posted against lower level WBS Elements and settlement is to be run on higher level WBS Element.
    Can I roll up the cost from lower level WBS to Higher level WBS so that settlement can be run against the asset class assigned with higher level WBS Element
    Please advise. Thanking you in anticipation...
    Warm Regards

    Hi,
        You can perform this kind of settlement in two ways based on different conditions:
    1. If there is only one asset to be created from project, then instead of hierarchical settlement you can use the line item settlement to the same asset maintained in the settlement rule of superior WBS, by using settlement strategy as in customization as ( Settlement rule generation: account assignment category........4)  Copy rule from superior object. So that settlement of all the object will be done to the same asset.
    2. Otherwise, if you want to have the settlment to the same asset of your project structure in hierarchy, then you can use SAP note number 211324, to have Settlement rule generation: account assignment category as 05 (Superior WBS element), in the customization of settlement strategy.
    I hope this should help you.
    Regards
    Avisek Bhardwaj

  • Capital Project Settlement Rule for lower WBS

    Hello,
    At my present client, for Investment projects the client want to settle top level WBS to AUC and capitalise it. So ideally the cost from lower level WBS should flow to top WBS. I am using substitution to remove investment profile from lower WBS.My concern is how do I auto populate the settlement rule for lower WBS to top WBS. I am aware about settlement strategy and OSS note 211324 (however dont want to implement this note)
    The appraoch I am looking for is using "WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE' BAdI . However this BADI calls for strategy and I could not maintain the required strategy (settlement to top WBS). Is there some BADI/Function module available which can be called for updating the settlement rules on lower WBS while saving or Release ? Can I make use of exits in Substitution?
    Please let me know your opinions.
    Thanks
    Sarang

    Thanks Virendra. I agrree the only approach is development. But I need to give inputs to my developer.
    We tried with BADI "WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE" but it didnt work as it calls strategy in configuration.
    So I am checking for some other options for e.g "WORKBREAKDOWN_UPDATE" which is called during save or Fn modules K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_FILL or K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_SAVE which I can use. This is a client requirement to create AUC only at top level n all cost to be rolled up to superior WBS n then settle to AUC.
    The other option I was thinking is of using exits thru substitution.
    What will be the best approach?
    Thanks
    Sarang

  • Capital project WBS settle to AUC individually

    Dear all experts,
    please help me on the following issues.
    i am working on a capital project. Investment profile is defined and assgined to the project profile.
    the top WBS is T-09-001
    the second level WBS are T-09-001-01,  T-09-001-02,  T-09-001-03,  T-09-001-04, T-09-001-05 for example.
    the third level WBS is T-09-001-05-01.
    i do the test settlement when the project status is release. (i didn't maintain the settlement rule.)
    the result is that every single WBS is settled to a FXA (the numbers are generated automatically)
    for example
    T-09-001-01 to  FXA 1000/40047/0   30000CNY
    T-09-001-02 to  FXA 1000/40048/0   40000CNY
    T-09-001-03 to  FXA  1000/40049/0  40000CNY......
    i am not sure if it is correct or not, because it's my first time to deal with capital projects.
    if i want to settle all the sub-WBS to top WBS and the top one settled to AUC, how can i do it.
    i manually maintain the settlement rule for all the sub-WBS to top WBS and settle the project again.
    but the result is the same. i don't know where the problem is.
    please tell me how to do it or how to settle the capital projects in most cases?
    thanks a lot.
    judy

    Below was something which we had done in such case:
    1. Created a substitution rule against the WBS element, if the level of WBS >=2 substitute the Investment profile with 'Blank'. With this when ever you create a project and save it or call the substitution from menu, system would retain the investment profile on level 1 WBS and when project is released only 1 AUC is created for the project which is on level 1 WBS.
    2. Settle all other lower WBS to it's parent WBS and you can implement OSS note 211324 - CJB1: Strategy for settlement to superior WBS. Refer the below link about how this works:
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/ModificationnoteforStrategyforsettlementtosuperiorWBS
    Doing both the above, you would create only 1 AUC (on level 1 WBS) and finally settle all lower WBS to level 1 WBS and from there system would then automatically settle the costs to AUC fixed asset.
    Regards
    Sreenivas

  • Generation of WBS Settlement Rule

    Hi Folks!
    I was wondering if there is any function module that allow me to generate a WBS Settlement Rule for a specific project and for elements on level 3.
    If there is no FM for this, is there any workaround to do this.
    Thx for any advise.
    Regards,
    Gilberto Li

    Hi Gilberto,
    Hm, not a question that has a simple answer. Settlement rules are first of all defined in customizing how the should be behave and secondly lies the question how to update a CO cost object with this settlement rule.
    Let us first assume that customizing is done with a settlement profile named ZZ_PROF for instance. This is defined in customizing like path (from R/3 4.7): Trans SPRO -> Project System -> Costs -> Automatic and Periodic Allocations -> Settlement -> Settlement Profile -> Create Settlement Profile.
    My first advice would be to use the "automatic settlement derivation feature" that can be setup in customizing alike. Trans SPRO -> Project System -> Costs -> Automatic and Periodic Allocations -> Settlement -> Settlement Rule for Work Breakdown Structure Element. Read the docu for this node (right click and choose Display documentation) to understand what possibilities and limitations this functionality has. Below this node you have the possibility to define a "settlement strategy" and allocate this to a project profile. There is also an option to define a BADi whereby you you can somewhat influence the automatic generation of settlement rules. You must "obey" the rules in the "settlement strategy" but can do some filtering of SD orders influence and derive a "settlement strategy" baseed on some coding logic of your choice.
    To execute these settings on operative projects you run trans CJB1 (collective processing) or CJB2 (indicidual processing).
    All in all: This is good functionality but maybe not what you are looking for due to the built in "restrictions" in the "settlement strategy" profile.
    My second advice would be: What I did in the past was to write a batch input program that was run just before period end closing (that is before settlement - of course) that did read all relevant WBS elements without a settlement rule and derived a new settlement rule. Finally, updated the setttlement coding block with this info. Processing of the BDC is then done via trans SM35 the normal way.
    I also did a check for trans CJB2: In include LKAZBF15 there is the "magic" call to the update FM with name KSRG_GENERATE_RULE. One option could be to set a break point here and run the trans to see what parameters has to be filled. This implies that the customizing is done before, of course. I have a feeling that this is NOT the easist solution to use - to fill the parameters correctly may be difficult
    I hope this helps you in deciding what action to take.
    Sometimes a simple BDC will do the trick although it may not be a "good" solution.
    Disclaimer: There might be some other relevant FM to solve your problem as I am not aware of. If you find one for WBS elements then I would certainly be interested in any findings.
    Regards, Johan

  • Regarding WBS settlement Rule using  WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE BADI

    Hello every one could any one tel me about
    Settlement rule of WBS by using BADI  WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE
    I wanted to use same settlement rule far all WBS under same project
    eg IF user enter settlement rule for WBS level 1 that should get copy into remaining all WBS thats all requirment
    I am trying it thtough BADI  WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE  and method DETERMINE STATERGY ?
    Can i do selecting settlement rule of WBS1 and updating same table with same values for remianing WBS levels.
    Thank you in advance
    Deepak Pawar

    Hi Deepak,
    Yes, you use the that Badi, but he badi WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE is actually not needed to fulfill the requirement, if the customizing is set accordingly.
    More important is the selection in CJB1 or CJB2, so that the inherit not happend from the project defintion(instead of WBS1) to underlying WBS.  I think, it can only be done using right variant with CJB1.
    There is a new Badi  WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE_NEW, which allow more detailed control of the copy settlment rule action.  The method GET_TEMPLATE can be used to determine which object( e.g. WBS1 )  should be used.
    Kind regards,
    Zhenbo

  • Create Settlement rule for L2 WBS via CJB1/2

    Hi Everyone
    In the past we have settled WBS elements to either PSG/CCtr/AUC. We now want to have WBS hierarchies where the lower level WBS element will settle up to the superior (Level 1) WBS element.
    I have configured the following items in EEC 6.0:
    Created new Allocation Structure (Z4), this is a copy of WBS settlement to PSG, changed the reciever catergory to WBS element
    Created new settlement profile (Z00005) with allocation Structure Z4
    In the settlement strategy have added the new settlement profile with the following settings:
    Account assignment element - Active
    Settlement Profile - Z00005
    AAt Assugn Cat.- 5 (Superior WBS element)
    N:1 SD-PS - Active
    I also have the existing setting to the PSG with RA key populated.
    When I execute CJB2, it states that three two records processed, no errors. However when I look at the master data, only rule is created on Level 1 WBS and not lower level.
    Can anyone help?
    Gurprit

    Hi Abdul
    Created a new one - only the L1 was updated with a SETC. Log from CJB1 shows the following:
    Project                      Object                 Strategy   Bill Acct Org.c SProf. AcctAsgnCt      N:1 RA Key  Recipient              AA fld
    E0108003040000     E0108003040001         Z6     X                   Z00003 Profitability s    X   Z00006   PrfSeg assigned   Old
    E0108003040000     E0108003040002         Z6          X              Z00005                         X                                                0
    E0108003040000     E0108003040003         Z6           X             Z00005                         X                                                0
    Any thoughts?

  • Description of 2nd level WBS

    Hi Experts,
            Can any one suggest me to get description of 2nd level WBS in Adobe Forms.
    Thanks.

    Hi Sarang,
    If there is no object that incurs actual cost associated to your WBS element at Level 1 then you do not need to settle it, provided the 4 WBS es below it settle all the costs individually to respective settlement receivers.
    Let me know if that helped.
    jibat

  • BAPI/FM to create WBS settlement rules.

    Hi,
    I would like to know if there is a FM or BAPI to create WBS settlement rules. I use CJ20N transaction to create manually. Any qucik response will be much appreciated and Obviously rewarded
    Thanks,
    Vivek.T

    U can use the user exit
    COPCP005 and its function exit EXIT_SAPLCKAZ_001. Try this out....
    Or choose any one options from the below list which suits ur requirement:
    Develop Enhancements for Material Costing
    The following SAP enhancements are available for the area Cost Estimate with Quantity Structure:
    o Costing Reports (SAPLXCKA)
    o Costing Production Resources and Tools (COPCP003)
    o Material Valuation with Cross-Company Costing (COPCP001)
    o Costing Bulk Materials (COPCP004)
    o Valuation Price for Materials from User Exit (COPCP005)
    1. Costing Reports: SAPLXCKA
    Here you can create your own reports for displaying cost estimates with quantity structure or activate the example reports in the standard system.
    This enhancement contains the following components:
    · EXIT_SAPLCKAZ_001 Display/print itemization
    This enhancement contains example program code from SAP that you can modify and use for your own enhancement, or activate directly as a report for the itemization.
    · EXIT_SAPLCKAZ_002 Display/print cost components
    This enhancement contains example program code from SAP that you can either modify and use for your own enhancement, or activate as a report for the cost components.
    · EXIT_SAPLCKAZ_003 Display/print cost components and itemization
    This enhancement does not contain example program code.
    In the cost estimate with quantity structure you access the reports with Costs -> Display user exit. The report refers to the first cost component view listed. If you want to see the costs with reference to another cost component view, choose Settings -> Cost display and choose the desired report under Select view.
    You can display your own reports in the information system by adding them to the report list for product costing.
    See also:
    Check report list for material cost estimate
    2. Costing production resources/tools: COPCP003
    This enhancement contains the component EXIT_SAPLCK01_001.
    The costs for production resources and tools are calculated as a flat rate within production overhead.
    This enhancement enables you to plan the costs for production resources in costing with quantity structure in different ways. Here you can specify how the production resources are to be costed.
    In the cost component structure, the production resources can be shown in separate cost components.
    This enhancement contains example program code from SAP that you can modify or use as is.
    3. Material valuation with cross-company costing: COPCP001
    This enhancement contains the component EXIT_SAPLCK21_001.
    Here you can enter the prices for valuation of a material that is transferred between company codes.
    You have the following options for the valuation of materials that are transferred between company codes:
    o You are using the standard system without cross-company costing. In this case the system uses a price in the material master record in accordance with the valuation strategy. The material is treated as if it were externally procured.
    o You activate cross-company costing. In this case the material is recosted in the other company code or transferred according to the transfer control ID.
    If you have not activated cross-company costing, you can use this enhancement to define alternative prices for valuation of a material that is transferred between company codes. That is, this enhancement allows you to specify which price should be used instead of the price from the material master record.
    In include LXCKAF)) you can find an example program code. However, this code example can not be directly copied and used
    4. Costing Bulk Materials: COPCP004
    This enhancement contains the component EXIT_SAPLKKEX_001.
    You can use this enhancement to plan the costs for bulk materials and show in the cost element itemization.
    If the indicator Bulk material is set in the material master, the indicator Relevant to costing in in the BOM does not accept input for the item. The enhancement allows you to determine the costing relevancy. The items with the bulk materials indicator at item level of BOM are also included as relevant to costing.
    This enhancement contains example program code from SAP that you can modify or use as is.
    5. Valuation Price with Valuation Strategy U: COPCP005
    This enhancement contains the component EXIT_SAPLCK21_002.
    You can use this enhancement to specify prices for valuation of materials if you want to use valuation strategy U (valuation with USER EXIT) for material valuation to find a price for the materials.
    This enhancement does not contain any example program code from SAP.
    Activities
    To activate the SAP example reports (the procedure is similar forthe other enhancements):
    1. Create a new project or use an existing one.
    2. Set the indicator SAP enhancements and choose Change.
    3. Enter SAPLXCKA as the SAP enhancement and choose Save.
    4. Set the indicator Enhancement components and choose Change.
    5. Position the cursor on the enhancement component EXIT_SAPLCKAZ_001 and choose Edit -> Use SAP source code.
    6. The system asks whether you want to create ZXCKAU01. Answer Yes.
    7. Maintain the attributes.
    8. Save the program and choose Back.
    9. Position the cursor on the enhancement component EXIT_SAPLCKAZ_002 and choose Edit -> Use SAP source code.
    10. The system asks whether you want to create ZXCKAU02. Answer Yes.
    11. Maintain the attributes.
    12. Save the program and choose Back.
    13. Activate the project.
    14. To display the reports, you must perform costing again.
    Further notes
    Unlike modifications, enhancements are always upgrade-compatible because they are implemented in a name range reserved for the customer rather than in the SAP original.
    The general procedures for creating enhancements can be found in the enhancement transaction CMOD under Goto -> Online Manual. This takes you to the SAP library where you can find detailed information on customer exits.For more information on the above enhancements, see the associated function module documentation.
    Reward if useful...
    Regards
    Karthik D

  • Fetch Top level WBS elements for delivery type LP

    Hi everyone,
    we are working on a delivery analysis report and we are in progress of fetching sales order number for deliveries with delivery type LP.
    How we are doing?
    so we are fetch the UP values from PRHI table for the wbs elements in LIPS.
    Now we need to fetching the top level wbs elements from PRHI table by passing the UP values to the same table until the UP field value becomes initial.
    Then fetching the corresponding sales orders from the VMPA table for the wbs elements from PRHI table for the value of corresponding UP field is initial.
    So it is going through so many iteration to fetch the UP value again and again until it is initial.
    What we need?
    So if someone can suggest a FM or method to fetch the top level WBS element for the given WBS element from LIPS table will be of great help.

    Hi,
    Try FM
    'BBP_PS_PROJECT_GET_LIST
    'BAPI_PROJECT_GETINFO

  • Budget Control at top level WBS only

    Hello All,
    I have a requirement from client where I need to activate the Budget control (90% warning and 100% error). I have done the setting accordingly.
    Now the scenario is such that when client is doing budgeting, they are allocating the budget only at top level WBS (they have a different legacy, where they are doing there detail planning n budgeting, but since they want the feature of budget control in PS, they will do minimal budgeting in PS). As per my settings when I budget top level WBS and save the availabity control is activated (with no budget on lower level WBS). Now when I try to do some postings/or assign that WBS to PO, even with a value of 1 USD, i am getting an error of budget exceeded, which is fine as per the settings as that WBS is having 0 budget.
    The requirement from client side is such that they want AVAC to be activated only at top WBS and do postings to lower WBS. But if the total of lower WBS exceed the budget of top WBS, they should get an warning or error. For example:
    WBS level  BUDGET ACTUALS
      1               100
      2                              50
      2                              50
    so as soon as the actuals touch 100, the system should give an error/warning. Note that the 2nd level WBS are not budgeted in SAP, so budget is 0 on them.
    I have 2 questions:
    1.Is it possible to activate AVAC only for top WBS ?(without any enhancement/development)
    2.How the AVAC will work, if the total of 2nd level WBS exceeds the budget of top WBS (as explained in example above)?
    Awating your replies.
    Thanks
    Sarang

    Thanks Virendra, it was useful.
    I tried other way round also i.e. by not marking the release tab in OPS9 and activating AVAC in CJ30.It works in that way too.
    For my other question, regarding activating AVAC only at top level, we can achiebve that by using transaction control in user status.
    Thanks
    Sarang

  • Cost Object in FI document with WBS Settlement

    Hi,
    I'm testing WBS settlement to G/L account which is cost element. I made some substitution rules because I met an error message saying that "Cost Object is needed"
    As a result I can settle WBS to cost elements such as COGS etc. I got a FI document, CO document and PCA document. Everything looked so nice.
    Suddenly I noticed, however, that there is no such a thing like cost object on FI document. When I look up the FI document using FB03, I found that the PS-POSID was empty. Of course, CO documents have Cost Object.
    What I wonder is as follows
    1. Is this standard? Is it natural that FI document with CO doc has no cost object on it?
    2. If I need to use FI document to determine WBS element, what is the best to way? Is it possible to enter Cost Object such as wbs element in FI document during settlement?
    Thank you for your kind advice in advance.
    Message was edited by:
            Namseok Kang

    Kang,
    In the message which you got, the word 'Cost Object' refered to a cost center, or order, or any other cost object.
    However, there is another account assignment object with the name 'Cost Object', which was not filled in the FI document. That is normal.
    Right now I don't have much information in the a/c assignment object 'Cost Object'.
    Regards,
    Vishal.

Maybe you are looking for