WCS Alarms - Configuring Thresholds

I am using 6.0.181.0
I want to understand what the thresholds are for WCS alarm severity levels. For example, I received an alarm indicating it was low on disk space "did not meet the requirements", but I want to know whether I can adjust these thresholds? I know I can adjust them from Critical to Major etc. but I can not see anything that enables me to quantify these severity levels.
Can anyone help?
Regards
Andrew

This is not a user customizable setting, and there is no control in any version of WCS to
turn that alarm off.  The best you can do is lower the level of the alarm. 
The free disk space alert an be deleted without issue.
I believe the error message indicates the required available space such as:
WCS 'x.x.x.x' does not meet the minimum hardware requirements for disk space.
Available: '14'GB. Minimum requirement: '30'GB.
E-mail will be suppressed up to 30 minutes for these alarms.

Similar Messages

  • Exchange 2013 - The Microsoft Exchange Transport service is rejecting message submissions because the service continues to consume more memory than the configured threshold

    Noticed at about noon that no emails had been received all day. Began to investigate and found that the MS Exchange Transport service had been set to deny email submission because it was using too much memory on the server (91%). 
    The error message makes me think that we may have been getting used by malware or something similar.“The Microsoft Exchange Transport service is rejecting message submissions because the service continues to consume more memory than the
    configured threshold.” 
    There are also several warning messages that list particular IP addresses and say that a connection from that IP was denied because there were already the maximum number of connections (20). 
    From what I can tell, all of the IP addresses are from Taiwan. 
    The time period for which some emails may be missing is from close of business yesterday ( 4/3/2014) through about 12:45 today (4/4/2014). 
    From the time I spent reading and trying to figure out the error, I think we may need to readjust our throttling policies to prevent this from happening. 
    The exchange server is currently running at 90%+ CPU and 50%+ memory usage the majority of the time, and I’m not sure how to fix it.
    Also, I cannot get into EMS I get a access denied message from the destination computer. (Exchange server) I want to get into there to change the throttling policy back to default, since we disabled it.
    The Error reads:
    The WinRM client cannot process the request. The WinRM client tried to use Kerberos authentication mechanism, but the destination computer <Exchange> returned an 'access denied' error. Change the configuration to allow Kerberos authentication
    mechanism to be used or specify one of the authentication mechanism supported by the server. (How do I do this?) To use Kerberos, specify the local computer name as the remote destination. (I'm trying to use EMS while logged into the local Exchange server)
    Also verify that the client computer and the destination computer are joined to a domain. (Exchange is on our domain, and the computer trying to connect is the same computer) To use basic, specify the local computer name as the remote destination, specify
    Basic authentication and provide user mane and password. Possible authentication mechanisms reported by server.
    At line:1 char:1
    + New-PSSession -ConnectionURI "$connectionUri" -ConfigurationName Microsoft.Excha ...
    + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        + CategoryInfo          : OpenError: (System.Manageme....RemoteRunspace:RemoteRunspace) [New-PSSession], PSRemotingTransportException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : AccessDenied,PSSessionOpenFailed
    I assumed control of this exchange system already in place and I do not have much experience with exchange 2013 or server 2012. I do know 2008, but that doesn't help very much in this situation.
    Recent changes to the system:
    About three days ago we switch our sessions policy to allow many more connections, and I believe this caused the issue. This is what I changed it to:
    Made the registry DWORD (32-bit) "Maximum Allowed Sessions Per User" and modified the value to 1000. Location of registry change @ HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIS\ParametersSystem
    I just changed it to 10 from the 1000. I'm hoping this solves this. So far no.
    Also, I am not the best in the shell or command line interfaces. Any help would be wonderful!

    Hi,
    Yes, could be hardware performance issue. Try recycle the Transport process and see if the issue persists.
    Thanks,
    Simon Wu
    TechNet Community Support

  • UCCX 7 Alarm Configuration

    In UCCX 7 alarm configuration if I set the syslong external server
    IP address and set filter level say 4 we get all alarms even above 4.
    We get 1 through 7. Has anyone played with the larm level and successfully has
    received in the remote syslong server only the levels needed? Also if you have used
    the SNMP traps and MIBs successfully could you explain which one worked.
    I am referring to the serviceability guide for 7 but not clear if all SNMP configuration is covered.
    Thanks.

    The three accounts you mentioned there are Application Users, not End Users. As such they will not exist in Active Directory. The CCX installation documentation will instruct you to create the AXL account with Super User rights. CCX will then create the second two accounts for you.
    Installation Guide for Cisco Unified CCX and Cisco Unified IP IVR, Release 7.0(1)

  • Alarm/Alert Threshold Configuration

    Is there currently a way to modify alarms related to interferences on a per interference level? I have looked all over and I can only find enabling or disabling them but not adjust them as granular as we would like. We have APs located all over the country in locations that house a good amount of Guest traffic and BYOD. We get slammed with DECT Like phone, WiFi Invalid Channels, Inverted Channels all the time. We don't want to just stop alarming or alerting on them, but rather adjust the sensitivity to account for this specific environment.
    Cisco 8510 Controller w/ 7.6.120.12 software
    Cisco 5508 Controller w/ 7.6.120.0 software
    MSE w/ 7.6.120.0 software
    Prime Infrastructure 2.1

    There are some settings you can change on the WLC relating to alert / alarm levels in areas like client density, interference, etc.
    You can find those under Wireless > 802.11a/n/ac or 802.11b/g/n > RRM > Coverage or General depending on the setting.
    Randy

  • WCS Alarms - Disassociated AP's

    I've just installed WCS for the first time and have been configuring the email alerts/alarms. I left the default settings of Critical alerts only but find I am getting spammed.
    Now, I want to be alerted when an AP goes offline, but I've found that quite a few of the AP's seem to momentarily loose connectivity on one if not both radio interfaces - and then immediately come back up.
    This results in 2 email alerts almost simultaneously - one telling me the AP interface has shut down and disassociated from the controller, and then immediately after another email telling me the previous message has been cleared and the AP has re-associated with the controller. It doesn't appear to be specific AP's but random ones throughout the day.
    So 2 questions:
    1 - Is this normal behavior for access points and if not, what could be causing it?
    2 - Is there any way to set a threshold on the length of time an AP is down before receiving an email alert from WCS?
    WCS - 5.2 (the latest build)
    WLCs - 4404 with 5.1.151.0
    APs - 1131AG
    Thanks in advance.
    Rob

    I have TAC Case opened for very similar issue.
    WCS 5.2.130
    WiSM 5.2.178
    APs 1252
    1st part was that my WiSMs were not set up...the 1st Octet of the Service Port must be different than Manager and AP Manager interfaces. It is actually in a doc -- it ignores the subnet masks!
    After I changed that (requires WLC reboot) my messages went down quite a bit. But there is a 2nd part ... not sure if it affects 1131s. I was told that there is a bug in the Marvell chipset. They have a fix in beta and it is going through regression testing. Hopefully out in next release by end of May. So my case is in "Release Pending" status waiting for the fix to be released.
    Hope this helps...

  • WCS Alarms

    Hi ,
    Iam getting continueous alarm message on my WCS Server..
    The messeges are "  IDS 'NetStumbler generic' Signature attack cleared on AP " and " AP Impersonation " both are says critical alarms.
    Please help me on how to resolve this alarms to stop generating.
    Thanks & Regds,
    Lalit

    Hello,
    Do a search in this document for netstumbler for an explanation of the IDS signature causing this alarm:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/5.0/configuration/guide/c5sol.html
    The AP impersonation alarm is triggered by an snmp trap sent by the WLC. The trap sent is:
    bsnAPImpersonationDetected.
    This happens when a radio of an authenticated access point has heard from another
    access point whose MAC address neither matches that of a rogue nor is it an authenticated
    neighbor of the detecting access point.
    On aggressive environments, a helpful feature is to enable access point authentication with
    a threshold of 2. This enables you to detect possible AP impersonation and minimize false
    positive detections.
    This is how to configure it from the CLI of the Wireless Lan Controller (WLC):
    config wps ap-authentication enable
    config wps ap-authentication threshold 2
    Finally, you can change the severity of the AP impersonation alarm in WCS from critical to
    lower so you are not alerted. This can be done from Administration > Settings > Severity Configuration.

  • WCS Alarm Status shows green but LAP is unplugged ?! Oper Staus shows Down

    Hello,
    we are operating a Cisco WLAN environment with 1242 and 1131 LAP. Some of them have been converted from AP to LAP.
    Now we took some LAP off the wall.
    They are now packed in a box in our storage room.
    But the WCS is showing a green Alarm Status for these LAP and as Oper Status Down.
    How can that be ?
    Is there a way to fix this problem, because we want to see the Alarm Status in Red.
    Thx for all your input.
    Best Regards
    Christian

    This is very interesting. If I try to put myself in the WCS developer's shoes, I think:
    - if you get an alarm for missing AP, then acknowledge the alarm, WCS has no reason to re-display the same alarm. This is precisely what Acknowledge is for, to say "don't bother me with this issue anymore".
    - Even if you manually remove the AP from WCS, it clearly keeps some memory of it, at least for a while. This is something you can clearly see if you run a report of any kind, WCS has to keep track of objects even if you remove them.
    My suggestion would be:
    - Unacknowledge the alarm, then delete it... acknowledging an alarm is probably not the best way to deal with removing an AP. You would use Aknowledge for alarms such as "your neighbour AP keep being detected as rogue, you can't remove your neighbour AP but don't want to hear about this warning anymore." You acknowledge the alarm, WCS keeps it in its database and remembers NOT to bother you with it anymore (exactly what happens in your case).
    For an AP you remove, I would not acknowledge the alarm, but simply delete it after having removed the AP. This removes the alarm from the WCS database.
    If you ever re-plug this AP to the network, WCS may remember it, but any new alarm about it will display.
    Hope it helps
    Jerome

  • CUCM License counting and Alarm configuration with SMTP

    Hi All UC Experts,
    After the CUCM version 9 happened, the CUCM will become trail 60 days when the used UCL license is over.
    Is it possible to set a SMTP alarm to inform the admin to purchase the UCL ASAP?
    I checked the SMTP host configuration: If you want the system to send you e-mail, from the Certificate Expiry Monitor, for example, you must configure an SMTP host.

    Hi Edwin,
    There is no such feature available in ELM on version 9.x. Alarms for 'demo' and 'overage' are generated 7 days after the condition is detected.
    HTH
    Manish

  • About QoS configurable thresholds...

    Hey,
    I was reading through QoS guides and got confused about the threshold things.......
    According to document,
    you can use following command to configure maximum memory allocation for egress queue.
    mls qos queue-set output qset-id threshold queue-id drop-threshold1 drop-threshold2 reserved-threshold maximum-threshold
    you can use following command to configure allocated memory for egress queue.
    mls qos queue-set output qset-id buffers allocation1 ... allocation4
    So now questions:
    1. Why queue-set? There will be 4 queue for egress anyway...
    2. If queue-set is useful feature, Why no queue-set for ingress?
    3. Why multiple thresholds? For ingress, there will be one threshold per queue.
    4. When is drop-threshold1 used? When will drop-threshold2 used?
    Thanks,
    /S

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    Or, perhaps this isn't the best forum for this question. 
    See if this document helps: https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8093

  • Interference violation detected shown in WCS Alarm

    Hi Cisco Support,
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-ansi-language:#0400;
    mso-fareast-language:#0400;
    mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
    Question 1: When we tried to set the Load threshold “Max Clients” from value 18 to 20, we receive this error:
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-ansi-language:#0400;
    mso-fareast-language:#0400;
    mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
    Do we need to disable the wireless network 802.11b/g before we can set it? Will ALL the APs be rebooted?
    Question 2: For the interference threshold, we need to set it higher than the default value 10 in order for avoid interference violation messages from WCS?
    Question 3: When we receive the interference violation from WCS, it does not indicate any interference value, how can we determine it’s value in order for us to decide the interference threshold value we can set to avoid interference violation messages from WCS?
    v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-ansi-language:#0400;
    mso-fareast-language:#0400;
    mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-ansi-language:#0400;
    mso-fareast-language:#0400;
    mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
    Please help to advice on this. Thank You.
    Junhan

    Hi,
    1) Yes you need to disable the network b/g. That does not reboot the APs  at all. It just brings the radios down (disconnect all clients) obviously. When you bring network up, network is up in a matter of seconds (maybe less)
    2) Yes. But it's just to lower the amount of messages you see. The level of interference you have on your network stays the same. You are just less alerted.
    3) Go on monitor-> AP and find out the AP who reported the alert. The interference level should be indicated.
    Hope this helps.
    Nicolas
    ===
    Don't forget to rate answers that you find useful

  • WCS Alarms reporting lost keepalive messages

    Starting a few days ago, two of my WISM-based controllers generated this message: "Keepalive messages are lost between Controller 'xx.xx.xxx.xx'and Master.Please check the controllers port configuration,any software or hardware
    incompatibility issues."
    My question is what is considered the "Master?", What it is referring to? The only Master I know of within the context of the WISM is when you set up a Master Controller for configuration purposes, but this is something that I have NOT done and it is in fact, disabled.

    got same problem, did you get a resolve?

  • Help Agenda alarm configuration

    Hello,
    Is there a possibility to change the volume and type of alarm in the I-Touch calendar ? With the alarm by default in the aganda I don't know if you tried but you can't hear anything which is a problem if you use it to warn you few minutes before your appoitment

    A A P L wrote:
    Hook it up to an external source - stereo or iPod-specific speakers.
    I have it setup that way.
    I have a BOSE SoundDock at home and a stereo at the office.
    Do you carry around all that stuff in your pocket? That is a really poor work around. Apple should fix this problem if possible through software. The iPod should be a stand alone device. When I am in a meeting, I do not what to be late for the next, and I need to hear it in my pocket.

  • Design needed to configure certain threshold values by user

    Hi All
    what is the best design in SSIS , where USER wants to configure threshold value at any time . we need solution without any UI development ? Is it possible by only SSIS ? 
    Surendra Thota

    Hi ,
      What do you mean by threshold values here ? If they are where clause filters in query to be applied ,you can consider using Package configurations. With this you can configure the values externally to package in a file, table or environment and the
    package will pickup at run time.
    For more details on package configurations refer below link
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-IN/library/ms141682.aspx
    Best Regards Sorna

  • SUNMC ALARMS  THRESHOLDS MEANING

    Hi friend,
    I am able to see thresholds like below..
    Will any one kindly explain this ?
    What does they mean actually ?
    Unknown, Lost commands and No contact status values ---- Critical Threshold for FANSTATUS
    Regards
    Srinivas Masetty

    Does anyone have a list of SunMCs default thresholds,
    or know how I can find them without drilling down
    into each module?If you don't mind looking at some strangely formatted text files, the standard thresholds can be found in /opt/SUNWsymon/modules/cfg/*-d.def files.
    In the Console, if a module is loaded, you don't have to open an Attribute Editor for every value... instead you can go to the "Module Manager" tab, click the module, then the "Rules" button, and see all thresholds set (including any you set yourself).
    That will show most of the defaults. But for some alarms (especially hardware alarms) their thresholds are more complex (and/or hidden) in "rules". I can't get to docs.sun.com right now to give you a link, but a search of the SunMC docs will list the names of the rules and what they do. The Health Monitor module uses many rules and is a good place to start your search.
    Is there a single doc listing all attribues and thresholds? Not that I've ever seen. But someone may prove me wrong! :)
    Regards,
    [email protected]
    http://www.HalcyonInc.com

  • %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm

    Hi,
    I am facing a strange problem in one of my Cisco Catalyst 4900M switch. We have a ten gig WAN link which went down (error-disabled) couple of weeks back with logs suggesting Low TX power.
    Tried followingtroubleshooting approach, but it did not resolve the problem.
    SFP replaced
    Tried connecting the link on a different port.
    Fibers tested and found to be OK
    Performed loop test and was able to see the loop on both end of the P2P link.
    Replaced the Cables between PTT demarcation till switch patch panel.
    Switch Logs:
    IOS Version: bootflash:cat4500e-entservices-mz.150-2.SG1.bin
    Model: Cisco Catalyst 4900M
    *Jun 19 12:32:36.582: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: link-flap error detected on Te1/1, putting Te1/1 in err-disable state
    *Jun 19 12:34:04.154: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 12:44:04.254: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 12:54:04.354: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 13:04:04.454: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 13:14:04.558: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 13:24:04.658: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 13:34:04.761: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 13:44:04.861: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 13:54:04.961: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 14:04:05.061: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 14:14:05.161: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 14:24:05.261: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 14:34:05.361: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 14:44:05.461: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 14:54:05.561: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    *Jun 19 15:04:05.661: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
    Switch1#
    Switch1#
    Switch1#
    Switch1#sh int te1/1
    TenGigabitEthernet1/1 is down, line protocol is down (err-disabled)
      Hardware is Ten Gigabit Ethernet Port, address is 2c54.2de6.5100 (bia 2c54.2de6.5100)
      Description: ***P2P ***
      MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
         reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
      Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
      Keepalive set (10 sec)
      Full-duplex, 10Gb/s, link type is auto, media type is 10GBase-LR
      input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
      ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
      Last input 02:39:04, output never, output hang never
      Last clearing of "show interface" counters 2w0d
      Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
      Queueing strategy: fifo
      Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
      5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
      5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
         2367 packets input, 199072 bytes, 0 no buffer
         Received 2367 broadcasts (2367 multicasts)
         1 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
         5 input errors, 4 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
         0 input packets with dribble condition detected
         5951 packets output, 453948 bytes, 0 underruns
         0 output errors, 0 collisions, 13 interface resets
         0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
         0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
         0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
    Switch1#
    Switch1#sh int te1/1 transceiver detail
    ITU Channel not available (Wavelength not available),
    Transceiver is internally calibrated.
    mA: milliamperes, dBm: decibels (milliwatts), NA or N/A: not applicable.
    ++ : high alarm, +  : high warning, -  : low warning, -- : low alarm.
    A2D readouts (if they differ), are reported in parentheses.
    The threshold values are calibrated.
                                  High Alarm  High Warn  Low Warn   Low Alarm
              Temperature         Threshold   Threshold  Threshold  Threshold
    Port       (Celsius)          (Celsius)   (Celsius)  (Celsius)  (Celsius)
    Te1/1       30.7                74.0        70.0         0.0       -4.0
                                  High Alarm  High Warn  Low Warn   Low Alarm
               Voltage            Threshold   Threshold  Threshold  Threshold
    Port       (Volts)            (Volts)     (Volts)    (Volts)    (Volts)
    Te1/1      0.00                   N/A         N/A         N/A        N/A
               Optical            High Alarm  High Warn  Low Warn   Low Alarm
               Transmit Power     Threshold   Threshold  Threshold  Threshold
    Port       (dBm)              (dBm)       (dBm)      (dBm)      (dBm)
    Te1/1      -40.0                 4.4         0.4        -8.2      -12.2
               Optical            High Alarm  High Warn  Low Warn   Low Alarm
               Receive Power      Threshold   Threshold  Threshold  Threshold
    Port       (dBm)              (dBm)       (dBm)      (dBm)      (dBm)
    Te1/1      -12.3                 4.4         0.4       -14.4      -18.4

    I did replace the SFP with a new one.
    Interface Te1/2 is up and working.
    SESK_P2P10G-4900MSOD-SW1#sh int te1/2 transceiver de
    ITU Channel not available (Wavelength not available),
    Transceiver is internally calibrated.
    mA: milliamperes, dBm: decibels (milliwatts), NA or N/A: not applicable.
    ++ : high alarm, +  : high warning, -  : low warning, -- : low alarm.
    A2D readouts (if they differ), are reported in parentheses.
    The threshold values are calibrated.
                                  High Alarm  High Warn  Low Warn   Low Alarm
              Temperature         Threshold   Threshold  Threshold  Threshold
    Port       (Celsius)          (Celsius)   (Celsius)  (Celsius)  (Celsius)
    Te1/2       34.6                74.0        70.0         0.0       -4.0
                                  High Alarm  High Warn  Low Warn   Low Alarm
               Voltage            Threshold   Threshold  Threshold  Threshold
    Port       (Volts)            (Volts)     (Volts)    (Volts)    (Volts)
    Te1/2      3.22                   N/A         N/A         N/A        N/A
               Optical            High Alarm  High Warn  Low Warn   Low Alarm
               Transmit Power     Threshold   Threshold  Threshold  Threshold
    Port       (dBm)              (dBm)       (dBm)      (dBm)      (dBm)
    Te1/2       -1.5                 4.4         0.4        -8.2      -12.2
               Optical            High Alarm  High Warn  Low Warn   Low Alarm
               Receive Power      Threshold   Threshold  Threshold  Threshold
    Port       (dBm)              (dBm)       (dBm)      (dBm)      (dBm)
    Te1/2       -3.6                 4.4         0.4       -14.4      -18.4

Maybe you are looking for

  • SFP : Error in opening document (Layout)

    Hi All, A SFP form was developed in Language "DE"; when I try to open the layout of the SFP (logged on using EN); I get the error "Error while opening document" and the form is not opened. But when the same layout is opened with a logon using languag

  • Adapter module for file renaming

    Hi all, I want to rename a file before writing into target directory. Is it possible to do this using adapter module? Im using File adapter at the sender and receiver. I tried renaming the file using DynamicConfiguration method.I want some custom con

  • Programming generic sync with the MDK in 6.20

    Has anyone been able to get the generic sync examples provided with the MDK working - GenericSyncExample.java in particular? I imported and compiled the example without a problem but when I run it I get teh foll dump. Unfortunately the source code is

  • Corrupt Lightroom Catalog

    I was recently working on a Lightroom 4 catalog that was saved on a G-Drive when the hard drive failed. I was able to recover the catalog using data recovery software, but now when I try to open it, Lightroom says it's unable to open due to an unexpe

  • Iphone updated by syncing.  Now battery is completely dead and phone will not turn on.

    I synced my phone using Itunes and afterward it appeared "dead".....would not open, would not charge,  would not do anything.