WCS Client Reports not Consistent

I am trying to determine how many 802.11b clients I have on my network so I can deside whether to turn off the protocol.  When I run the Client Summary report I get 26 for Number of Users.  However, when I run the Client Count:Daily Stats I only get 14 802.11b clients.  I am including all controllers in each of the reports.  I would expect these two reports to report the same numbers.

What version of WCS are you running?
What version of WLC code and controller do you have?
The WCS reads the number every 15 minutes and calculates the difference by comparing it to the prior polling period.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/wcs/7.0/configuration/guide/7_0clientmgmt.html#wp1110112

Similar Messages

  • WCS Client Reporting

    Hi All,
    hoping this is the right sub-forum for this query!
    WCS is missing entries from it's client details report.  on our firewall logs I had an IP I wanted to check for it's MAC address, I could see the log entry in our firewall and the time and date stamp along with the wireless IP Address.
    I ran the Client Details report in WCS on the date and specified the times between 12:00 noon and 6:00pm and it failed to find the associated IP address in the log.
    I know for certain that the IP was active at that point in time and it should appear in a our client details report, but it's not getting logged.
    We are using version 7.0.172.0 of Cisco WCS if that makes any odds

    You can use the WCS navigator. The Cisco WCS Navigator provides network administrators with easy, cost-effective access to information from multiple geographically diverse Cisco WCS management platforms. This innovative platform allows network managers to partition the unified wireless network at the management level.

  • MI Deployment does not work - Client reports "Ignored old data"

    Hi,
    when syncing with an mi client (Mi2.5 SP13) to deploy MAM application. The Client reports:
    Ignored old data that has been received for user XXX
    The Trace-File says:
    [20050906 10:28:45:953] I [MI/Sync                  ] Inbound file size for user xxx is 102
    [20050906 10:28:45:953] P [MI/Sync                  ] Synchronisation successfully connected
    [20050906 10:28:45:953] D [MI/Sync                  ] Begin: Dumping file C:\Programme\SAP Mobile Infrastructure\sync\xxx\in\inbound.sync
    <ID>MISYNC</ID><FLAGS>0x0</FLAGS><VERSION>251300</VERSION>
    <PROLOG>
      <JCO_INFO>JCO-library-version: 1.1.13; Creation time: UNDEFINED DATE UNDEFINED TIME</JCO_INFO>
      <SYNC_STATUS>A</SYNC_STATUS>
      <EXECUTION_TIME></EXECUTION_TIME>
      <MORE_PACKAGES_WAITING> </MORE_PACKAGES_WAITING>
      <SYNC_COUNTER>0</SYNC_COUNTER>
    </PROLOG>
    [20050906 10:28:45:953] D [MI/Sync                  ] End: Dumping file C:\Programme\SAP Mobile Infrastructure\sync\xxx\in\inbound.sync
    [20050906 10:28:45:953] D [MI/Sync                  ] Initial buffer size of BinaryReader is 102
    [20050906 10:28:45:953] P [MI/Sync                  ] Read current inbound counter from file: 0
    [20050906 10:28:45:953] W [MI/Sync                  ] Execution time is not set; either old data received or processing wihtin middleware failed.
    I have deleted any old assignments for the user and the device through the web console.
    The problem consists after uninstall and reinstall of the mi client also on different devices.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks in advance
    Alexander

    Thanks for your help so far.
    I did already install and reinstall the client.
    I get this error for some, also newly created users and for others on the same machine it works!
    I think it is related to the trace file row:
    <JCO_INFO>JCO-library-version: 1.1.13; Creation time: UNDEFINED DATE UNDEFINED TIME</JCO_INFO>
    This obviously leads to the conclusion that the data is outdated for the client.
    The client and server are in the same timzone and also configured that way.
    Any other ideas?
    Thanks
    Alexander

  • CR RPT in CMC with crosstabs returning results not consistent desktp client

    Hi Everyone,
    I built a report that works great. However, when I run it inside Central Management Console, the crosstabs generate random values that are not consistent with my CR2008 Desktop client results.
    Is there a workaround or something I can do to correct this?
    Thanks,
    Demoralized.

    Good point Don,
    We're in the process of upgrading CMC to the latest version now. It will be a few weeks before it's ready and I'll know for sure. I'll update this thread when I find out.
    John

  • Detailed client Report in WCS

    Hi,
    what exactly mean the fields of the traps  that appear in the Detailed Client report of the WCS?
    07/08/10 08:09,"00:04:23:71:67:bf",,"Campus> Ome > CN.OM.P03","XSFK2MP345","10.120.205.25",07/08/10 08:09,"0 secs","0.0.0.0",0,-128,"802.11b","N/A",0,0,0,0,"No","Associated","Client '00:04:23:71:67:bf' is associated with AP '00:23:eb:2d:8a:e0', interface '0'."
    which means many  associations of  "0Sec" with no IP assigned?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Are you still facing this issue?
    thanks,
    Vinay

  • WLC 2504 v7.5.102.0 Client Association Issues. Association not consistent

    Hi All,
    I'm having a strange issue whereby client association to my corporate or guest wifi ssid are not consistent. Sometimes I have no issues connecting repeatedly and other times I cannot connect and receive the "Windows was unable to connect to *SSID*"
    I'm unable to determine whether it is a wireless association issue or if its a authentication issue as I have troubles connecting to both my secure (WPA2, AES, 802.1x) corporate wifi or my guest (Open Auth) wifi.
    Currently per day I have about 15 users using the wifi on both SSID's. The access points are right in the vicinity of the users. I have 2 LAP1142 access points on separate 802.11a/b/g/n channels and signal strenght is always high.. I'm certain its not co-channel interference or interference whatsoever. RSSI values are -60dBm and SNR 30+ dB. On average I will have 10 users on the wireless fine but one or two people are unable to connect.
    I have had wireshark run and when it does not connect I do not see anything in the logs. No traffic is captured!
    I cannot see the AAA capturing anything. Signal strength as stated above is high ( I have the AP on my desk!)
    Sometimes I can instantly connect with no troubles and other times its not association at all. I've recently updated to version 7.5 and these issues started to occur. Previous version 7.3 had no problems at all for years!.
    The logs in the WLC show
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_0: Nov 27 04:42:09.956: #DOT1X-3-INVALID_WPA_KEY_MSG_STATE: 1x_eapkey.c:864 Received invalid EAPOL-key M2 msg in START  state - invalid secure bit; KeyLen 24, Key type 1, client 3c:a9:f4:4x:xx:xx
    Does anyone have an idea what could this issue could be?
    Many thanks

    Thanks for your reply Sandeep. Been working on it all afternoon with debugging.
    To answer your question, sometimes I can connect and sometimes I cannot. This afternoon I haven't been able to connect much at all. 2 out of 20 times perhaps. Other users I can see are connected to the two access points in this office. This isn't just happening on my laptop but several laptops. Same symptom.
    Heres the dot1x output I have captured from the debug of a FAILED association attempt.
    (Cisco Controller) >show debug
    MAC Addr 1.................................. 3C:A9:F4:36:1C:48
    Debug Flags Enabled:
      dot1x aaa enabled.
      dot1x packet enabled.
      dot1x events enabled.
      dot1x states enabled.
    (Cisco Controller) >*DHCP Socket Task: Nov 27 07:44:49.842: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 apfMsRunStateInc
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:45:15.284: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Processing RSN IE type 48, length 22 for mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:45:15.284: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Received RSN IE with 0 PMKIDs from mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:45:15.284: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Found an cache entry for BSSID 20:bb:c0:c9:26:92 in PMKID cache at index 0 of station 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:45:15.284: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Removing BSSID 20:bb:c0:c9:26:92 from PMKID cache of station 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:45:15.284: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Resetting MSCB PMK Cache Entry 0 for station 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:45:15.284: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Setting active key cache index 0 ---> 8
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:45:15.284: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 unsetting PmkIdValidatedByAp
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:45:15.284: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 apfMsRunStateDec
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:45:15.284: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 apfMs1xStateDec
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:15.287: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Disable re-auth, use PMK lifetime.
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:15.288: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 dot1x - moving mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 into Connecting state
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:15.288: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Sending EAP-Request/Identity to mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 (EAP Id 1)
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:15.288: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Sending 802.11 EAPOL message  to mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 WLAN 3, AP WLAN 3
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:15.288: 00000000: 02 00 00 3c 01 01 00 3c  01 00 6e 65 74 77 6f 72  ...<...<..networ
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:15.288: 00000010: 6b 69 64 3d 54 50 49 2d  57 49 46 49 2c 6e 61 73  kid=PI-WIFI,nas
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:15.288: 00000020: 69 64 3d 4d 2d 54 50 49  2d 51 4c 44 2d 44 43 30  id=M-PI-QLD-DC0
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:15.288: 00000030: 30 31 2d 57 43 30 31 2c  70 6f 72 74 69 64 3d 31  01-WC01,portid=1
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:29.326: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Failure sending WPA EAPOL-Key due to invalid state 0 to mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:29.326: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Unable to send WPA key to mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48
    (Cisco Controller) >*dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:29.326: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Unable to update broadcast key to mobile 3C:A9:F4:36:1C:48
    *osapiBsnTimer: Nov 27 07:45:45.126: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 802.1x 'txWhen' Timer expired for station 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 and for message = M0
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:45.126: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 dot1x - moving mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 into Connecting state
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:45.126: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Sending EAP-Request/Identity to mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 (EAP Id 2)
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:45.126: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Sending 802.11 EAPOL message  to mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 WLAN 3, AP WLAN 3
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:45.126: 00000000: 02 00 00 3c 01 02 00 3c  01 00 6e 65 74 77 6f 72  ...<...<..networ
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:45.126: 00000010: 6b 69 64 3d 54 50 49 2d  57 49 46 49 2c 6e 61 73  kid=PI-WIFI,nas
    *dot1xMsgTask: Nov 27 07:45:45.126: 00000020: 69 64 3d 4d 2d 54 50 49  2d 51 4c 44 2d 44 43 30  id=M-PI-QLD-DC0
    I can see that the WLC has tried to send a EAP-Request/Identity request to the client but no response back. I just don't understand why it works at times and why it doesn't.
    It has the same issues on my guest network which is open authentication. Nothing has changed in regards to configuration and it has been working for years. Only thing that changed was a version upgrade to 7.5 three weeks ago.
    Here is the debug output of the client MAC when attempting to association to the GUEST network.
    (Cisco Controller) >debug client 3C:A9:F4:36:1C:48
    (Cisco Controller) >*apfProbeThread: Nov 27 07:53:48.059: aggregated probe IE: TIMESTAMP
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.021: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Adding mobile on LWAPP AP 20:bb:c0:c9:26:90(0)
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.021: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Association received from mobile on BSSID 20:bb:c0:c9:26:91
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.021: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Global 200 Clients are allowed to AP radio
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.021: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Max Client Trap Threshold: 0  cur: 5
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.021: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Rf profile 600 Clients are allowed to AP wlan
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Applying Interface policy on Mobile, role Unassociated. Ms NAC State 0 Quarantine Vlan 0 Access Vlan 0
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Re-applying interface policy for client
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing IPv4 ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:2164)
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing IPv6 ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:2185)
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Apply WLAN Policy over PMIPv6 Client Mobility Type
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 In processSsidIE:4565 setting Central switched to TRUE
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 In processSsidIE:4568 apVapId = 2 and Split Acl Id = 65535
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Applying site-specific Local Bridging override for station 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 - vapId 2, site 'default-group', interface 'guest'
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Applying Local Bridging Interface Policy for station 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 - vlan 650, interface id 12, interface 'guest'
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 processSsidIE  statusCode is 0 and status is 0
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 processSsidIE  ssid_done_flag is 0 finish_flag is 0
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 STA - rates (8): 130 132 139 150 12 18 24 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 suppRates  statusCode is 0 and gotSuppRatesElement is 1
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 STA - rates (12): 130 132 139 150 12 18 24 36 48 72 96 108 0 0 0 0
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 extSuppRates  statusCode is 0 and gotExtSuppRatesElement is 1
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 START (0) Initializing policy
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 START (0) Change state to AUTHCHECK (2) last state START (0)
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 AUTHCHECK (2) Change state to L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) last state AUTHCHECK (2)
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Not Using WMM Compliance code qosCap 00
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) Plumbed mobile LWAPP rule on AP 20:bb:c0:c9:26:90 vapId 2 apVapId 2 flex-acl-name:
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) Change state to DHCP_REQD (7) last state L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4)
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 apfMsAssoStateInc
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 apfPemAddUser2 (apf_policy.c:333) Changing state for mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 on AP 20:bb:c0:c9:26:90 from Idle to Associated
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 apfPemAddUser2:session timeout forstation 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 - Session Tout 65535, apfMsTimeOut '65535' and sessionTimerRunning flag is  0
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Scheduling deletion of Mobile Station:  (callerId: 49) in 65535 seconds
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.022: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Func: apfPemAddUser2, Ms Timeout = 65535, Session Timeout = 65535
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.023: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Sending Assoc Response to station on BSSID 20:bb:c0:c9:26:91 (status 0) ApVapId 2 Slot 0
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.023: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 apfProcessAssocReq (apf_80211.c:7957) Changing state for mobile 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 on AP 20:bb:c0:c9:26:90 from Associated to Associated
    *apfMsConnTask_4: Nov 27 07:58:02.026: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Updating AID for REAP AP Client 20:bb:c0:c9:26:90 - AID ===> 4
    *apfReceiveTask: Nov 27 07:58:04.998: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) State Update from Mobility-Incomplete to Mobility-Complete, mobility role=Local, client state=APF_MS_STATE_ASSOCIATED
    *apfReceiveTask: Nov 27 07:58:04.998: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) pemAdvanceState2 5716, Adding TMP rule
    *apfReceiveTask: Nov 27 07:58:04.998: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) Adding Fast Path rule
      type = Airespace AP - Learn IP address
      on AP 20:bb:c0:c9:26:90, slot 0, interface = 1, QOS = 0
      IPv4 ACL ID = 255, IPv
    *apfReceiveTask: Nov 27 07:58:04.998: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) Fast Path rule (contd...) 802.1P = 0, DSCP = 0, TokenID = 15206  Local Bridging Vlan = 650, Local Bridging intf id = 12
    *apfReceiveTask: Nov 27 07:58:04.998: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) Successfully plumbed mobile rule (IPv4 ACL ID 255, IPv6 ACL ID 255, L2 ACL ID 255)
    *pemReceiveTask: Nov 27 07:58:04.999: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 0.0.0.0 Added NPU entry of type 9, dtlFlags 0x0
    *pemReceiveTask: Nov 27 07:58:04.999: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Sent an XID frame
    *IPv6_Msg_Task: Nov 27 07:58:05.000: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Pushing IPv6 Vlan Intf ID 12: fe80:0000:0000:0000:f0a7:e03b:151a:3af8 , and MAC: 3C:A9:F4:36:1C:48 , Binding to Data Plane. SUCCESS !! dhcpv6bitmap 0
    *IPv6_Msg_Task: Nov 27 07:58:05.000: 3c:a9:f4:36:1c:48 Link Local address fe80::f0a7:e03b:151a:3af8 updated to mscb. Not Advancing pem state.Current state: mscb in apfMsMmInitial mobility state and client state APF_MS_STATE_A
    (Cisco Controller) >

  • XL REPORTER NOT WORKING IN CLIENT

    Hi
    Anybody help me regarding my issue.
    I am using SAP 2007 B  version.  In Server XL reporter is working without any problem.  But in client it not opened.  The Error says Wrong executable digital signature for Add on.
    Any body tell me how to rectify this issue
    Balaji

    Hi ........
    Repair DI API and then try this addon again and clear Temp Files....
    Hope this will solve your problem..
    Regards,
    Rahul

  • WCS: Bug with unique client report?

    I'm running WCS 7.0.172.0 and have run into the situation where a Unique Client Report, when run for the last day, shows lots of clients (properly).  When you select a specific date range, you get no records, regardless of the date range (you can even select the last 24 hours with the drop-downs).  Is this a bug?

    I've gone back and forth with TAC on this, and it's been explained to me that the function of the report has changed recently and the description for what it does is no longer valid.  I STILL think there is a bug in this, however, as it appears whenever I run this report, it only shows me the unique clients RIGHT NOW, even if I pick "last day" which I'm told is really the only valid criterion... something is definitely broken here.

  • WCS Busiest Client Report Problem

    We are using Wism 4.0.155.5 and WCS 4.0.81.0. Everytime I run "busiest client report" on WCS, I get some clients with throughput more than 70Mbps and utilization more than 600%!!! It is very weird. Anyone see this as well? Thanks.

    zhenningx:
    I see it too. It definitely appears to be a bug, but I will do some checking. Mine show upwards of 2000% and most of my top 25 show an almost identical tx/tx amount of 4gb.
    If I make any headway with TAC, I'll let you know.

  • Windows 7 Client Operating Systems (Aggregate) reports not working

    Hello All,
    We are using Windows 7 Management pack in SCOM 2012.
    We tried running reports in Widnows 7 Client OS (Aggregate) MP.
    There is no data in the report. Do we need to enable any rules to collect data for these reports?
    We need Memory related reports in this MP.
    We have windows 7 agents and we can performance data in OPS console for those agents.
    Thanks!!

    Verify that you install windows 7 management pack from below link
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=15700
    You can also check below link to resolve your issue
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/54efc509-cbb0-407c-b826-17694cd5f0bc/windows-7-client-operating-systems-aggregate-reports-not-showing-any-data?forum=operationsmanagerreporting
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"

  • Cisco WCS client count report - client count figures cumulative or concurrent?

    Hi, 
    Just want to clarify the "assoicated client count" and "Authenticated client count" values from WCS Client count report concurrent or cumculative?
    The client count report in excel format:
    Total Client Count
    Total Count
    Event Time
    Associated Client Count
    Authenticated Client Count
    total
    Sun Oct 12 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    3992
    3854
    total
    Mon Oct 13 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    7838
    7289
    total
    Tue Oct 14 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    7724
    7124
    total
    Wed Oct 15 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    6849
    6336
    total
    Thu Oct 16 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    5908
    5530
    total
    Fri Oct 17 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    1240
    1228
    total
    Sat Oct 18 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    1040
    1031
    Client Count
    AP Name
    Base Radio MAC
    Event Time
    Associated Client Count
    Authenticated Client Count
    AP-EDHB-018
    08:1f:f3:23:23:10
    Mon Oct 13 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    160
    157
    AP-EDHB-018
    08:1f:f3:23:23:10
    Tue Oct 14 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    121
    120
    AP-EDHB-018
    08:1f:f3:23:23:10
    Wed Oct 15 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    95
    95
    AP-EDHB-018
    08:1f:f3:23:23:10
    Thu Oct 16 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    94
    94
    AP-EDHB-018
    08:1f:f3:23:23:10
    Fri Oct 17 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    6
    6
    AP-EDHB-018
    08:1f:f3:23:23:10
    Sat Oct 18 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    3
    3
    AP-EDHB-019
    08:1f:f3:23:24:30
    Sun Oct 12 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    38
    38
    AP-EDHB-019
    08:1f:f3:23:24:30
    Mon Oct 13 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    113
    110
    AP-EDHB-019
    08:1f:f3:23:24:30
    Tue Oct 14 23:59:59 HKT 2014
    110
    109
    AP-EDHB-018 have 160 assoicated client count reported.  Really mean there were 160 wireless client assoicated at a moment or there were a totally 160 connected at that day?
    Any idea?
    Dick 

    Hi Kayle,
    Thanks for the response.  I think you are talking about this in the above.
    Reports > Report Launch Pad > Client > Client Count > Client Count Report Details
    then
    AP by Floor Area  and select "All Campus", "All Building", "All Floor"
    By doing this I get 700+ APs daily client count in graphical (pdf) view and need to go through manually each graph to identify the top 50, top 100 in a given day.
    Is it possible to only filter the top 50, 100 APs ?
    I would like see my daily report gives something similar to the below
    AP Name    Max Client Count
    AP01               96
    AP02               83
    AP50               20
    Would it possible to get something like this from WCS reports ?
    Thanks
    Rasika

  • WCS Unique Client report problem

    If I run a "Unique Client" report in WCS (based on 4 controllers) using the range "last 1 day", I get plenty of data.  But if I choose a specific range of time, even within the last 24 hours, I don't get any data.  Seems like a bug.  Anyone else experience this issue?
    It's WCS 7.0.172

    Seems you are facing below bug and needs a patch uniqueclients.xml which can be provided by TAC.CSCtq64813
    Apply the workaround which done by the following steps:  1. Stop WCS 2. cd to /webnms/classes/com/cisco/server/reports/conf 3. Backup UniqueClients.xml 4. Copy the attached file to UniqueClients.xml (batch file attached in the case) 5. Restart the server

  • WCS:Client association reports

    Hi,
    In the WCS Menu:
    reports->client->client association
    when a client association occurs, the timestamp is referred to the time at which the WLC receives the request of association or the ACK association?
    ex:
    Association Time||Client MAC||Map Location||AP Name...
    11:13 AM||00:01:4a:e5:e0:9b||Campus Nord || A6 ...
    is possible to have a timestamp with milliseconds precision?
    Thanks.

    Sorry, i missed out to mention - WCS V4.1 is used for monitoring the WLAN.

  • Business partner of organizational unit is not consistent

    Hi,
    Client is on SRM 4.0. When we are trying to search a user in the org structure, and when clicking on "Check" for this user, it was showing fine. But when we are searching any BP in the org strucutre, then immediately the BP name is vanishing against the BP of the user and when doing the "Check" it is showing the below two messages:
    Business Partner of organizational unit XXXXXXX is not consistent
    User cannot be repaired becasue the organizational unit contains errors
    When checking in BBP_CHECK_USRES, the user is not showing as defective. It is green.
    Similarly, the the organizational unit check is also showing as green.
    System is advising to run BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE. When we run this for the org units, these are coming as green.
    Users are able to create the shopping carts and also are able to create confirmations. But the problem is happening for some of the users where the system is not allowing to create shopping basket / confirmation.
    Strange thing is that, when we are searching the user by user id in the org structure, then the check is showing no messages. But if we search the same user using the BP number, then in the check, the messages are coming. And once the messages appear, it is appearing for all the users in the org strucutre even at the root node level.
    Any help is highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Aswini

    Hi Aswini,
    There are some possibilities to raise these kind of errors messages:                                                                               
    1) User with inconsistent data.                                           
    Please, check the instructions described in the following notes:          
    597475 - Repair users with inconsistent address data                      
    -> use the report B_REPAIR_EBP_USER_2 to make the user consistent.        
    419423 - Repairing incorrect EBP users                                    
    350129 - Creating business partner for organizational unit                                                                               
    When you create the Org Units have you fully completed the address        
    data, e.g post coe, telephone/fax number etc..                            
    If not, please enter a full address, save the data and see if this        
    generates the Business Partner.                                           
    Remember, that you can delete this user and create a new user.                                                                               
    2) Error in the positions after HR replication                                                                               
    Please, implement the following notes and retest the scenario:            
    1056873 -  Incorrect SRM users after HR distribution                      
    1016450 - Replication of persons deletes positions in SRM                                                                               
    After implementing these notes you should send the employee               
    corresponsing to the user in error with his position (using               
    transaction PFAL or report RHALEINI in UPDATE mode for all periods.                                                                               
    3) the user was deleted and a new was created and during these two        
    actions the user opened documents. So, in this case, the new user         
    becomes inconsistent                                                                               
    If the user is deleted from SU01 still the BP and S which is related to   
    that user will be retained (we can see this in PPOMA_BBP) transaction.    
    In this case we can create the user again using SU01 and can be attached  
    with the old 'S' and 'BP'.                                                                               
    2. If the user is completed deleted ie., all relations BP and S.          
    The new user has created.   
    In this case if the new user is corrupted we can delete this                  
    user (since the new user doesn't create any documents so far). But the        
    old documents should refer to the new BP related to the new user.   
    ========================
    Also, another option would be to follow the below instructions
    After applying the notes 1056873 & 1016450, send the employees        
    corresponding to the users in errors with their positions (using              
    transaction PFAL or report RHALEINI in UPDATE mode for all periods,           
    using evaluation path A008) ? If not, please do this and it must repair       
    the SRM users. Please test and give me the feedback.     
    Hope this helps,
    Kind Regards,
    Matthew

  • GroupWise client reports that there is no Default Mail Clien

    Installation of GroupWise client reports that there is no default mail client. On clicking OK the next error: "The 'MAPI Session Handle' of the Novell GroupWise 'Object Request Broker' could not be accessed. The address book cannot run.
    In our company we use GroupWise 7 on a mix of Windows XP Pro and A few Windows 7 Pro machines. On all machines where the GroupWise 7 client with hot patch 4 (HP4) was installed everything works fine along with other installed applications with a specific mention of MS Office 2003 or even MS Office 2010.
    This morning (August 9, 2011) a new Windows 7 machine was deployed to a new Database Administrator. It was this machine that had these errors. The machine was deployed from a disk image.
    The problem was baffling because we never experienced this problem on the other Windows 7 machines and un-installing and re-installing GroupWise even with Administrator privileges did not solve the problem.
    Anyway, to cut a long story short, the bottom line is this: Don't trust an installation made by someone else even if they are Database Administrators! (Our IT dept consists of an IT Operations section and a Developers Section).
    The installation of Microsoft Office by the IT Operations crew never includes the Microsoft office OutLook client. This installation had it included and that was what was causing the whole problem.
    The Solution: Simply use the Microsoft Office installation to remove the Microsoft Office Outlook client and the problem went away immediately. We did not have to remove and re-install GroupWise after that was done.
    Hope this helps someone.

    Kenlobo <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > Hope this helps someone.
    >
    Thanks for sharing this.
    Danita - http://www.caledonia.net/blog

Maybe you are looking for