WCS HA - network between primary & secondary

Looking through the WCS 7.0 config guide, one of the pre-requisites for using HA between a primary and secondary instance of WCS is: "A reliable high-speed wired network must exist between the primary WCS and its backup WCS"
Is this implying they should be physically co-located with a wire-speed switched conenction between them, or could they be located across 2 geographically separated data centres which have a reasonable speed WAN between them?
Thanks
Nigel.

Hi,
Its not mandatory that we need to hav it in the same LAN.. we can have it over WAN as well! but just an FYI on the below bug..
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtj23398
Lemme know if this answered ur question!!
Please dont forget to rate the usefull posts!!
Regards
Surendra

Similar Messages

3600 AP keeps bouncing between Primary & Secondary 5760 WLC

Hello All,
I am not sure if it was a good idea to change the controllers from software based to IOS based :(..... Anyway this is the first time I am working on the IOS based controllers and have been going through very unusual thing. I have a 3600 AP and a couple of 2600 AP, I am just at the start of the configuration for a new deployment. Even though I have many concerns but I will start with the one which is bothering me the most, which is the APs keep jumping from a primary controller to the secondary controller. I have attached the sh run, sh logging, and the sh version for a 3600 AP and the two controllers. All I can understand from the logs is that the capwap interface keeps going down which causes the AP to fall back to the other controller, I have also tried turning off the AP FALLBACK feature, still no luck.
Addiditional Confusions,
Does any one know as how to setup HA in these controllers, as I do not see any HA or RP (Port) on these controllers neither there is any stacking module on the controllers. Would it be the old way of doing it, which was defining Primary and Secondary Controllers on the APs, if yes than I should receive two different licenses for the Controllers. But these are my devices Part numbers:
Primary: AIR-CT5760-500-K9
Secondary: AIR-CT5760-HA-K9
for now I have enabled the evaluation license on both the devices. I hope that does not make any difference.

Hi,
I have been doing some of my own trouble shooting and found out that as soon as I create a layer 3 interface on the controller so as to map it to any SSID, all of my APs start to jump on to the secondary controller and since there is a primary and secondary controller configuration on each AP they tend to come back but than soon after they jump back to the secondary....... As soon as I delete the additional layer 3 interfaces, apart from the wireless management, I get all the APs back to normal register to the controller without a glitch, I am pasting the logs being received for the APs behaviour. I have marked the logs in between with Asterics to indicate when I cleared the layer 3 interfaces and from there onwards all the APs started coming up again
Mar 12 15:09:58.624: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 4 times.!]
Mar 12 15:09:58.624: *%CAPWAP-3-ECHO_ERR: 1 wcm: Did not receive heartbeat reply; AP: 1c1d.86ee.7b40
Mar 12 15:10:03.427: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:10:05.373: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap13, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:10:08.539: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 7 times/sec!.]
Mar 12 15:10:11.657: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 3 times.!]
Mar 12 15:10:11.657: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:1f:e0
Mar 12 15:10:11.660: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap30, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:10:12.703: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap30, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:10:13.111: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap16, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:10:13.678: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap28, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:10:15.840: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:1f:e0
Mar 12 15:10:15.840: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:10:18.070: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap11, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:10:18.268: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap20, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:10:20.695: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 4 times/sec!.]
Mar 12 15:10:25.608: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap14, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:10:32.273: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 3 times/sec!.]
Mar 12 15:10:35.526: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap24, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:10:47.032: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap29, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:10:50.913: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 2 times/sec!.]
Mar 12 15:10:58.725: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 3 times.!]
Mar 12 15:10:58.726: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Configuration Update Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:10:58.726: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Configuration Update Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:10:58.726: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:11:00.521: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap30, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:11:08.450: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 3 times.!]
Mar 12 15:11:08.450: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Configuration Update Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:11:08.921: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Join Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:11:09.318: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP f0:29:29:92:c7:f0
Mar 12 15:11:09.319: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap15, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:11:10.319: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap15, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:11:13.413: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap27, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:11:14.095: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP f0:29:29:92:c7:f0
Mar 12 15:11:14.095: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b8:c0:a0
Mar 12 15:11:14.098: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap23, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:11:15.098: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap23, changed state to up
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
Mar 12 15:11:56.713: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b8:c0:a0
Mar 12 15:11:56.713: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:12:06.178: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap23, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:12:06.899: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 5 times/sec!.]
Mar 12 15:12:10.411: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 3 times.!]
Mar 12 15:12:10.411: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:cc:ca:60
Mar 12 15:12:10.413: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap1, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:12:11.266: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:cc:ca:60
Mar 12 15:12:11.266: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 1c:1d:86:ee:7b:40
Mar 12 15:12:11.267: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap3, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:12:11.413: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap1, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:12:12.267: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap3, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:12:16.889: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap4, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:12:30.365: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 1c:1d:86:ee:7b:40
Mar 12 15:12:30.365: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:e6:10
Mar 12 15:12:30.366: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap22, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:12:31.366: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap22, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:12:33.942: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:e6:10
Mar 12 15:12:33.942: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:12:48.627: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap1, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:12:51.385: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 4 times/sec!.]
Mar 12 15:13:06.083: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap15, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:13:09.053: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 3 times.!]
Mar 12 15:13:09.053: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Configuration Update Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
Mar 12 15:13:12.177: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
Mar 12 15:13:16.687: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 2 times.!]
Mar 12 15:13:16.687: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:1f:e0
Mar 12 15:13:16.688: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap31, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:13:17.689: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap31, changed state to up
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
Mar 12 15:13:20.998: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:1f:e0
Mar 12 15:13:20.998: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:1d:c0
Mar 12 15:13:21.001: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap21, changed state to up
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
Mar 12 15:13:22.001: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap21, changed state to up
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
Mar 12 15:13:23.935: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap22, changed state to down
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
Mar 12 15:13:40.943: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:1d:c0
Mar 12 15:13:40.943: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:13:41.815: %DOT1X-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (c0f8.da9f.8227) on Interface Ca21 AuditSessionID 0a06906e53207995000001b8
Mar 12 15:13:41.815: %AUTHMGR-5-FAIL: Authorization failed or unapplied for client (c0f8.da9f.8227) on Interface Ca21 AuditSessionID 0a06906e53207995000001b8
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
Mar 12 15:13:44.342: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 3 times.!]
Mar 12 15:13:44.342: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Configuration Update Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:13:44.344: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
VIP_G_M_Core1(config-if)#
Mar 12 15:13:54.081: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 2 times.!]
Mar 12 15:13:54.081: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Configuration Update Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:13:55.673: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap31, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:13:57.761: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Configuration Update Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:13:57.761: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:cd:01:f0
Mar 12 15:13:57.763: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap6, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:13:58.642: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:cd:01:f0
Mar 12 15:13:58.642: *%CAPWAP-3-ECHO_ERR: 1 wcm: Did not receive heartbeat reply; AP: 1c1d.86ee.7b40
Mar 12 15:13:58.763: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap6, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:13:59.044: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap18, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:13:59.512: *%CAPWAP-3-INVALID_STATE_EVENT: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination
Mar 12 15:14:07.361: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Invalid AP event (CAPWAP Discovery Request) and state (CAPWAP Join Response) combination[...It occurred 2 times.!]
Mar 12 15:14:07.361: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:a1:6f:80
Mar 12 15:14:07.362: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap2, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:08.111: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:a1:6f:80
Mar 12 15:14:08.111: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:a1:2d:60
Mar 12 15:14:08.115: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap8, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:08.363: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap2, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:08.964: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap21, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:14:09.114: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap8, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:13.525: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap3, changed state to down
Mar 12 15:14:16.013: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server 10.6.5.132:1812,1813 is not responding.
Mar 12 15:14:16.013: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server 10.6.5.132:1812,1813 is being marked alive.
THIS IS WHERE I DELETED THE LAYER 3 INTERFACES ON THE WLC
Mar 12 15:14:24.129: %DOT1X-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (c0f8.da9f.8227) on Interface Ca6 AuditSessionID 0a06906e532079bf000001b9
Mar 12 15:14:24.129: %AUTHMGR-5-FAIL: Authorization failed or unapplied for client (c0f8.da9f.8227) on Interface Ca6 AuditSessionID 0a06906e532079bf000001b9
Mar 12 15:14:42.537: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:a1:2d:60
Mar 12 15:14:42.537: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP dc:a5:f4:4d:80:10
Mar 12 15:14:42.539: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap17, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:43.539: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap17, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:46.456: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP dc:a5:f4:4d:80:10
Mar 12 15:14:46.456: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:22:a0
Mar 12 15:14:46.458: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap5, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:47.459: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap5, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:52.018: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:22:a0
Mar 12 15:14:52.018: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP dc:a5:f4:61:bc:d0
Mar 12 15:14:52.021: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap0, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:53.021: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap0, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:58.080: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP dc:a5:f4:61:bc:d0
Mar 12 15:14:58.080: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 7c:95:f3:54:0d:d0
Mar 12 15:14:58.083: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap9, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:59.082: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap9, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:14:59.727: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 7c:95:f3:54:0d:d0
Mar 12 15:14:59.727: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:cc:ca:60
Mar 12 15:14:59.730: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap10, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:00.730: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap10, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:04.498: %SW_MATM-4-WIRELESS_MAC_MOVE_NOTIF: Host 40f0.2f58.a172 moving from Port Te1/0/1 to Port Ca17 as wireless entry
Mar 12 15:15:05.916: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:cc:ca:60
Mar 12 15:15:05.916: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 24:b6:57:5b:7d:90
Mar 12 15:15:05.918: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap7, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:06.918: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap7, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:11.247: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 24:b6:57:5b:7d:90
Mar 12 15:15:11.247: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:de:b0
Mar 12 15:15:11.248: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap19, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:12.249: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap19, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:17.150: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:de:b0
Mar 12 15:15:17.151: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP f0:29:29:92:c7:f0
Mar 12 15:15:17.152: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap26, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:18.152: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap26, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:19.211: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP f0:29:29:92:c7:f0
Mar 12 15:15:19.211: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:dd:60
Mar 12 15:15:19.212: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap25, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:20.212: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap25, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:28.681: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:dd:60
Mar 12 15:15:28.681: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b8:ff:d0
Mar 12 15:15:28.684: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap12, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:29.684: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap12, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:30.285: %SW_MATM-4-WIRELESS_MAC_MOVE_NOTIF: Host 286a.bae3.de95 moving from Port Te1/0/1 to Port Ca7 as wireless entry
Mar 12 15:15:31.078: %SW_MATM-4-WIRELESS_MAC_MOVE_NOTIF: Host e0b9.ba1e.02b4 moving from Port Te1/0/1 to Port Ca7 as wireless entry
Mar 12 15:15:34.781: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b8:ff:d0
Mar 12 15:15:34.781: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:cc:a7:10
Mar 12 15:15:34.782: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap13, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:35.783: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap13, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:37.962: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:cc:a7:10
Mar 12 15:15:37.962: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:e6:10
Mar 12 15:15:37.964: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap16, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:38.965: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap16, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:40.401: %SW_MATM-4-WIRELESS_MAC_MOVE_NOTIF: Host e0b9.ba1e.4c97 moving from Port Te1/0/1 to Port Ca7 as wireless entry
Mar 12 15:15:44.895: %AUTHMGR-4-UNAUTH_MOVE: (slow) MAC address (40f0.2f58.a172) from Ca0 to Ca17
Mar 12 15:15:50.124: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:e6:10
Mar 12 15:15:50.124: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b8:9b:20
Mar 12 15:15:50.127: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap28, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:51.126: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap28, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:54.510: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b8:9b:20
Mar 12 15:15:54.510: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:a4:2f:00
Mar 12 15:15:54.512: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap11, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:55.513: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap11, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:58.371: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:a4:2f:00
Mar 12 15:15:58.371: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP dc:a5:f4:61:c9:10
Mar 12 15:15:58.374: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap20, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:59.263: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP dc:a5:f4:61:c9:10
Mar 12 15:15:59.263: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:ce:70
Mar 12 15:15:59.266: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap14, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:15:59.373: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap20, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:00.265: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap14, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:02.655: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:ce:70
Mar 12 15:16:02.655: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:e7:10
Mar 12 15:16:02.658: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap24, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:02.877: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:e7:10
Mar 12 15:16:02.877: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP dc:a5:f4:4d:7f:a0
Mar 12 15:16:02.878: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap29, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:03.659: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap24, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:03.879: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap29, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:07.595: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP dc:a5:f4:4d:7f:a0
Mar 12 15:16:07.595: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:1f:e0
Mar 12 15:16:07.598: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap30, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:08.597: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap30, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:10.146: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:1f:e0
Mar 12 15:16:10.147: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:cc:d6:30
Mar 12 15:16:10.148: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap27, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:10.821: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:cc:d6:30
Mar 12 15:16:10.821: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 1c:1d:86:ee:7b:40
Mar 12 15:16:10.824: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap23, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:11.148: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap27, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:11.824: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap23, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:16.727: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 1c:1d:86:ee:7b:40
Mar 12 15:16:16.727: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:a1:62:e0
Mar 12 15:16:16.730: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap4, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:17.729: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap4, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:21.617: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:a1:62:e0
Mar 12 15:16:21.617: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP dc:a5:f4:61:bf:50
Mar 12 15:16:21.618: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap1, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:22.619: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap1, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:23.266: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP dc:a5:f4:61:bf:50
Mar 12 15:16:23.266: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b8:c0:a0
Mar 12 15:16:23.268: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap15, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:24.268: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap15, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:26.127: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b8:c0:a0
Mar 12 15:16:26.127: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:1d:c0
Mar 12 15:16:26.128: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap22, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:27.128: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap22, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:27.919: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:67:1d:c0
Mar 12 15:16:27.920: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b8:a7:e0
Mar 12 15:16:27.921: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap31, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:28.922: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap31, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:30.051: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b8:a7:e0
Mar 12 15:16:30.051: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:a4:29:00
Mar 12 15:16:30.053: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap18, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:31.054: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap18, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:32.695: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP 34:db:fd:a4:29:00
Mar 12 15:16:32.695: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:a1:67:40
Mar 12 15:16:32.697: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap21, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:33.697: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap21, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:34.336: *%LOG-3-Q_IND: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:a1:67:40
Mar 12 15:16:34.336: *%LWAPP-3-VALIDATE_ERR: 1 wcm: Validation of SPAM Vendor Specific Payload failed - AP d0:c7:89:b4:d0:20
Mar 12 15:16:34.339: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Capwap3, changed state to up
Mar 12 15:16:35.339: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Capwap3, changed state to up

Difference between primary eindex and secondary index?

hi experts
pls answer me
difference between primary eindex and secondary index?
rewads apply.
thanks.
naresh.

hi,
check this link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/cf/21eb2d446011d189700000e8322d00/frameset.htm
A difference is made between Primary & Secondary indexes to a table. the primary index consists of the key fields of the table and a pointer to the non-keys-fields of the table. The Primary index is generated automatically when a table is created and is created in the datebase as the same times as the table. It is also possible to define further indexes to a table in the ABAP/4 dictionary, which are then referred to as Secondary indexes.
Always it is not mandatory that an index should have all the key fields of a table. To see the index of a table
goto SE11->specify table name->click on the indexes... button on the application toolbar.
Based on your requirement you can you any of those index fields in the where clause of your query. Always its a better practice to use the index fields in the order specified. While selecting the records from a table it is always better to select the fields in the same order as specified in the table.

How to switch between primary and secondary langua...

Hi guys,
I've got an e52 but the only way to type in sec. Language while writing a message is:
Option-> Input Options-> writing language-> primary writing language (which must be changed to new one)
so there is no use of second. lang. or at least I don't know how to switch quickly between primary and second language without going that path.
ANY HELP WOULD BE APPRECIATE.
Aram

HI Everyone,
not sure if this helps. My solution is more fo Singpore users.
As i text between English and Chinese, I was unable to set my Secondary language to Chinese as there is no option to do so in the Writing language menu.
By discovery, i first set my Primay language as Chinese. Then further down the Language menu there is this option Default input. Click on that and select the default using Text case and select Ok.
When writing sms, you can switch between this 2 languages using the # key.
Hope it helps.
Have a pleasant day.
Aram_ocp wrote:
Hi guys,
I've got an e52 but the only way to type in sec. Language while writing a message is:
Option-> Input Options-> writing language-> primary writing language (which must be changed to new one)
so there is no use of second. lang. or at least I don't know how to switch quickly between primary and second language without going that path.
ANY HELP WOULD BE APPRECIATE.
Aram

ISE Primary/Secondary max latency

Hi There,
My understanding is that you can run ISE with one node set as primary and zero or more nodes set as secondary, with the secondaries located closer to the end points.
1. Does this mean the local users closest to a secondary node will authenticate against it rather than hitting the primary?
2. What if the delay between primary and secondary is larger, say 700ms-1000ms. Is this going to flap and desync?
Thanks,
Brendan

Yes you can have Primary and secondary ISE in your Distributed env.
A Cisco ISE node can provide various services based on the persona that it assumes. Each node in a deployment, with the exception of the Inline Posture node, can assume the Administration, Policy Service, and Monitoring personas. In a distributed deployment, you can have the following combination of nodes on your network:
•Primary and secondary Administration nodes for high availability
•A pair of Monitoring nodes for automatic failover
•One or more Policy Service nodes for session failover
•A pair of Inline Posture nodes for high availability
1. No, As per my understanding All your clients authenticate with primary ISE.
2. When Primary ISE is down then:
When the primary Administration ISE node becomes unavailable, we must log into the secondary Administration ISE node and promote it to become the primary Administration ISE node. There is no automatic failover for the AdministrationISE node.- Means High Avilability )
In case the primary Monitoring ISE node goes down, the secondary Monitoring ISE node automatically
becomes the primary Monitoring ISE node.
Regards

Difference between primary key and primary index

Dear All,
Hi... .Could you pls tell me the difference between primary key and primary index.
Thanks...

Hi,
Primary Key : It is one which makes an entry of the field unique.No two distinct rows in a table can have the same value (or combination of values) in those columns.
Eg: first entry is 111, if you again enter value 111 , it doesnot allow 111 again. similarly for the strings or characters or numc etc. Remember that for char or numc or string 'NAME' is not equal to 'name'.
Primary Index: this is related to the performance .A database index is a data structure that improves the speed of operations in a table. Indices can be created using one or more columns, providing the basis for both rapid random lookups and efficient ordering of access to records. The disk space required to store the index is typically less than the storage of the table (since indices usually contain only the key-fields according to which the table is to be arranged, and excludes all the other details in the table), yielding the possibility to store indices into memory from tables that would not fit into it. In a relational database an index is a copy of part of a table. Some databases extend the power of indexing by allowing indices to be created on functions or expressions. For example, an index could be created on upper(last_name), which would only store the uppercase versions of the last_name field in the index.
In a database , we may have a large number of records. At the time of retrieving data from the database based on a condition , it is a burden to the db server. so whenever we create a primary key , a primary index is automatically created by the system.
If you want to maintain indices on other fields which are frequently used in where condition then you can create secondary indices.
Reward points if helpful.
Thanks,
Sirisha..

Cisco ASA - Invert primary/secondary

Hello
This is my first post in this forum.
I haven't found an answear to my issue, so I decided to open a new discussion
We take care of 2 Cisco ASA 5580 (primary/secondary) working as usual (active/standby). Image version 8.2.5.
Today I found that the firewall that has been supposed to rule as primary, actually has been the secondary and vice-versa.
How can I configure (and what's the impact, as they are active im customer/business environment) to invert the situation: the primary become the secondary and the secondary become the primary.
I'm not talking about to perform a failover, but a config to fix that confusion with roles.
Regards
Christian

Hi,
Welcome to the CSC
Since we are talking about an Active/Standby ASA Failover environment then configuring the "primary" and "secondary" in the "failover" configurations of the ASAs doesnt to my understanding have much meaning to the firewall operation other than deciding which becomes Active WHEN they BOTH boot at the same time.
If we for example have the below situation
We have ASA1 and ASA2 in Active/Standby Failover
ASA1 is configured as "primary" and ASA2 is configured as "secondary"
ASA1 is originally the Active unit and ASA2 the Standby unit
Now lets assume that either ASA1 boots or becomes Standby because of one of its interfaces failing THEN to my understanding there is NO mechanism in the Active/Standby Failover that would return the Active role back to the ASA1 when it becomes operational.
However in the case of Active/Active Failover its possible to configure a "preempt" parameter that defines that the unit that you have decided as the Active unit will return to Active role after network outage after a configured perioid of time. This is NOT possible on Active/Standby.
So in normal networking operation to my understanding the only way to really keep the preferred physical ASA as Active is to monitor the Failover and manually set the original physical ASA Active if there has been a failover.
There doesnt seem to be any automatic mechanism for the Active role to return to the original Active physical ASA.
IF you are just talking about changing the commands "failover lan unit primary" and "failover lan unit secondary" to the correct physical ASAs THEN sadly I can't say for sure (without testing) what effect configuring those commands have (when changing them around). I'd presume that changing these wont have any effect on the operation of the firewall as in production they DONT actually decide which unit STAYS Active
According to the Command Reference of 8.2 software the default setting is Secondary
I imagine you could possibly do the following (But cant say for 100% certainty without testing it myself)
remove the possible configuration "failover lan unit secondary" from the other unit
remove the "failover lan unit primary" from the other unit
configure the "failover lan unit primary" on the correct unit
And finally if you want configure the other unit with the "secondary" option (even though the default setting should be secondary according to the command reference)
Maybe I'll try to check if I have a identical Failover pair of ASA (physical) to test this out for you.
Heres link to the Command Reference for 8.2 software and the command "failover lan unit"
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/command/reference/ef.html#wp1930580
Hope the information was helpfull.
- Jouni

Cisco 5508 HA VS Primary/Secondary- Feedback

Anyone having issues with 5508 HA switching between the pair? Would you say that the Primary/secondary fail over is good enough?

Hi Leo, Scott
So I was doing a bit more reading on this http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless-mobility/wireless-lan-wlan/69639-wlc-failover.html it is an old document but working through it the document suggested that you didn't need to specify the IP address of the Primary or Secondary controller in the Wireless -> All AP -> AP_NAME -> High Availability. I removed this from one of the APs that was at the time serving no clients and tried to move it to the secondary and it worked. I then moved it back to the primary and it worked again.
Any reason why this would happen? The IP addresses I was using were 100% correct. The only difference I see for this controller as opposed to others we manage is the introduction of new interface types i.e. 'redundancy management' , 'redundancy port' ,etc. I do not have redundancy enabled so I'm guessing not, but having trawled through the configuration this is the only difference I can see?

Primary & Secondary Languages?

Hi,
What is the differentce between primary and Secondary langues with inheritence and current langues?
Thanks In advance
Vijay

hi,
Primary & secondary languages:
Repository can be maintained in multiple languages. In the console we will define in how many languages repository is maintained ( 3 0r 4 languages), you can maintain N number of language layers. when ever you are logging into the repostory using language English, if it is not maintained it will be opened in other language in the order you maintained in the repository. we can compare the data in different languages, colour coding.
MDM multilingual support fully addresses all of the requirements for multiple languages side-by-side within a single MDM repository. It starts with an end-to-end Unicode implementation that supports both Western and Eastern languages, reflects a data model with multiple language layers that avoids data duplication while ensuring data
integrity, and features an innovative user interface that offers flexibility and efficiency during the entry, editing, browsing, and publishing of multilingual data.
An individual MDM repository can be defined as storing data for an effectively unlimited number of languages, chosen from a list of languages and locales recognized by the system (e.g. English [US] and English [UK]), including both western European and Eastern languages.
follow these links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_mdm550/helpdata/en/43/e0dbe6b4310a29e10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_mdm550/helpdata/en/43/e0dbe6b4310a29e10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
hope this may help you,
regards,
srinivas

Primary secondary syslog

hello ,
We have multiiple syslog server in our network , I was adding 6509 switch to send logs to these server .
I want to configure them in primary secondary mode cant find command to make one syslog primary and second secondary . as I dont want to send logs to secondary syslog when primary is avaiable

Amit
I don't think you can do this. I think you have to send the syslog messages to both servers.
In fact this would be what you want. Imagine if the main syslog server crashed and you needed to see the logs before and after the server crashed. If you set it up the way you want then the secondary server would only have syslog messages after the primary server had crashed so you would not get the full picture.
I appreciate it means more network traffic but it would better, in my opinion, to have both syslog servers logging all messages all of the time.
Jon

Difference between PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE KEY with NOT NULL

What is the difference between PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE KEY with NOT NULL constraint?
Message was edited by:
Nilesh Hole

Answer for the master!!!
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:8743855576462
Thanks,
Karthick

How do i set a peer to peer network between my iMac and windows machines?

I want to set up a peer to peer network between my iMac and Windows based computers in my house. I also want it to a wireless set up. Mostly being done to share videos, pictures, and music. Any insight would be appreciated.

I'm trying to connect my MacBook Pro to Wifi using internet sharing
Why?
Just connect the MacBook to the same internet as your iMac.
MacBook > Wi-Fi router > Internet.
You are connected to the internet with your iMac.
iMac > Wi-Fi router > Internet
Why do you want to go MacBook (via Wi-Fi) > iMac > Wi-Fi router > Internet?

Im trying a home network between Mac and Win 7, but its very slow

Hi guys,
ive searched for this for the last couple of days, but i havent found my sollution yet.
I have been trying to setup a network between my macbook and win7, and it works...i can move data.
The problem is that it is VERY slow. (2MB/sec max in the monitor app, it takes 6 minutes to transfer 1GB)
This is my setup:
Macbook 2011 ML 10.8 (I use WiFi to the router)
Zyxel P-2601HN-F1
Dell PC (connected thru ethernet cable to the router)
The ethernet adapter of the Dell is 192.168.1.37 and its a new cabel.
So i type in CMD-K, then smb://192.168.1.37 and connect with user and pass
I tried all the stuff i read here, like changing channels, but it stays really slow.
The crazy part is when i do both in Wifi, its almost as fast as with cable...and i DO use different ips in the smb connection
Maybe im going wired all over the studio and my house, but i would be awesome if this would work at least at 10/20MB/s, thats almost usb stick speed.
please help,
wendel

So i bought the Airport Extreme and hooked up all my hd's on the usb port...
the wireles upload speed from macbook to hd's is 5-6MB/s which is a lot better (40-48Mbit/s)
in the end i think its a protocol & adapter settings issue, with Windows using smb2, and apple using some old protocol from the 90's in ML 10.8.x
Also, there are a lot of (for me) complicated network adapter settings one has to know, before getting great transfer speeds between Win and OSX...so its easy to mess it up in Windows 7.
I read that Mavericks switched to smb2 too...so let's wait for all my software to be mavericks compatible and see how fast that will be with my Airport Extreme!
cheerio

Creating network between Mac and Linux

Hello guys! I need to set up network between my iMac and Ubuntu linux. iMac is connected in internet by Airport and Fon Wifi Router witch is connected in router which is connected to adsl -modem. My pc is connected directly to router. Both computers have access to internet. Is there any easy solutions to share files with mac and linux? I don't need any webservers etc, I just want to share files.
Other question related to this, why is my mac's ip address like 192.168... and linux ip addrress is 84.250...?
Thanks allready!

Though I'm not newbie with computers, I'm really confused becouse I haven't set up network like this never before.
Not a problem, no worry... we all know something somebody else doesn't and vice versa.
My linux says that my DHCP -IP is 193.210.18.18, is that related to this in any way?
Yes, if the Mac had an IP of 193.210.18.x, (but not 18 for x), then connection would be simple, but I think we must have two devices passing out IPs. What is the Mac's IP again?
http://www.helpdesk.umd.edu/topics/communication/ethernet/office/winxp/2882/
Do you have any advice where I could start looking from the right IP of my linux?
http://www.webmasterforums.com/networks-clusters/1804-find-ip-address-my-linux-b ox.html
I'm not sure if its even configurable.
http://tinyurl.com/2gug9s

Network between Vista and Mac

i'm trying to create a network between a Vista desktop and my Macbook Pro for files and printer sharing.
after lots work with setting on Vista, I now can enter in MacbookPro folders from Vista. the problem is by Mac side: i can't find the printer connect on Vista (and shared), and the icon of PC don't appear on Finder, so i can't enter on Vista's folders. the problem with file sharing is strange, cause only one time, today, icon of PC was appeared on Finder (come back to Stop of Mac)..... i've traied with the same method another times, without success...
I don't now what to do. I hope someone help me
Message was edited by: -Slevin-

I have limited knowledge but will try to help you as I have battled through this myself recently...You will lose nothing if you give it a try!
In System Preferences open the Sharing folder. Check the boxes to enable 'File' & 'Printer' Sharing. In the same open window select 'Options'.. Here I have Share files and folders using AFB and (importantly) also Share files and folders using SMB. - 'on' should be checked and 'Account' should i believe be the name assigned to your Macbook. - select 'Done' and then also close the 'sharing' window in sys preferences to take you back to the desktop.
In 'Finder' select the 'Go' option in the toolbar. Select connect to server from the drop down menu. You now need to enter the server address which will be the name of your Vista Pc - enter as follows: smb://(your vista name).. you may have to also enter the password for the Vista machine if it is configured in this way. ( It has been a while since I completed this so a little rusty here!)
If you have entered the correct information when you hit 'Connect', your Macbook should find your Vista desktop that has previously not been appearing in your Macbook 'Sharing' section - this was the issue that I was originally experiencing. You should now see the Vista machine in the Sharing section of your Macbook.
If this has been successful to here... This will enable access to try to solve the printer sharing problem? I think this one is beyond me as there are so many different configurations/installation options dependent upon the type of printer and network configurations.
It is possible to configure your Macbook to automatically find your Vista machine at startup if it is not found as a matter of course, which I perceive to be the case here... Try this to automate connection at startup..
Go to Sys Preferences and sect 'Accounts' you may have to enter your password to initiate changes. Making the assumption that you are connected now to your Vista machine and it is showing in the 'Shared' section of 'Finder'- select the 'Login Items' option and then select the '+' under where it states 'To hide an application when you log in etc etc.
From the window that opens you will now select your Vista machine from the left hand folders menu. when done click 'Add' and close windows to return to your desktop. Re-start the Macbook to check whether the Vista machine will now load to the Mac automatically at startup.
I hope this works for you as it has for me - The non discovery of the vista machine by the Mac was driving me round the bend

WCS HA - network between primary & secondary

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for