WEB module export image size

Team, I am
exporting just two images from the Web Mo
dule...using the basis HTML
gallery template.
The original image size is 4972K (4.9Mb)
After I select export in the web module, the resulting image is around
200K in the content\images\large directory.
I have the "Large Images" Quality slider at 100
Is is the case...that no matter what...the image will be manipulated or reduced in size by the web module engine?
I would like the original image to be exported out to the content\images\large directory.
Is this possible?
I was just on phone with support...close to two hours...disconnected twice...but the phone support folks were not aware of what I am doing.
I am using LR 3.3 in Windows...if that matters.
Thank You,
-Rich O
[email protected]

Rich,
RichO2010 wrote:
Beat, I have not made any adjustments.  Not sure where "Image Pages" are.  But, under the Web module, I have tried several "Large Images" quality settings under the "Output Settings"
You find this setting under the Appearance section:
I am getting the sense that no matter what...the LR Webgallery engine wants to "optimize" the images for web output.
I just want the people that visit the site, the ability to download the original image...unaltered.
I have not found a way to go beyond 2071 pixels for image width in Web Gallery.
From what i am reading so far, I think I should just let the galley engine do its work. Then come back and upload the original images under the content\images\large (or whatever the output destination might be).
That might be a way to achieve what you want. There might be side-effects regarding borders, watermarks etc.
Beat

Similar Messages

  • Why Does Lightroom Web Module Export Images At 240 ppi?

    Firstly, please forgive my ignorance on this subject. I am in the process of getting together a website of my images and have been experimenting with preparing the images and thumbnails through Lightroom's web module. I've noticed that when opening the finished images in Elements, that they have all been converted at 240ppi. Surely, images for websites should be at 72ppi (or possibly 96ppi)? Or am I dimmer than even I thought? 

    should I simply ignore the resolution box?
    Yes indeed. You set the size unit box in the export dialog simply to pixels and then size the right number of pixels for your web use. Typical is for example 800 pixels on the long end. The resolution box is not relevant for web use. It is really only used as a hint to a final printing size.
    So I imagine the 240ppi conversion must be the Lightroom default value. Do you think?
    Very likely so. I believe Lightroom, just like Photoshop, assumes 240 for files that do not start out having the tag so that is probably what happened if this started as a scan. Many scanners do not write this tag at all, but most DSLRs write the tag into their files and it is usually 240 for older generation cameras and 300 for later ones. I don't know why they do that as it is again not relevant as people print at any size they want.

  • Web module exports all the different preview sizes

    Trying out the web module - I select a flash template with extra large previews. When I export to Dreamweaver, not only are the Extra large previews exported but also large, medium etc. This means that if I upload to my server I will use far more space than necessary. Can I prevent this? Or can I simply delete all but the extra large pictures?

    When exporting a Flash gallery it does export three sizes. Those three sizes are "relative" to the "preview size" setting, which you could kind of think of as setting the size for the "largest" of the three. When the gallery is loaded into a browser, the gallery automatically detects the size of the window, looks at the rendition sizes available, and then downloads the largest rendition size that will fit into the window. It then does some pretty sophisticated pre-fetching of the other images of that size based on user behavior (linear vs non-linear browsing of the gallery). The gallery does not download the other renditions at all - unless the end user changes the size of their browser window such that a different rendition size should be used. The gallery does not real-time scale the images inside Flash - except in the case where the browser window is made too small for even the smallest rendition, in which case it will scale down the image in real time (this is why your "trick" works). In Beta 4, the gallery threw scroll bars on the images themselves if the window was too small. I think the 1.0 approach is much better.
    Granted this takes up extra room on the web server, (pretty cheap these days though) but if there were only one rendition, it really should be a size that will fit on 800x600 monitors - which is still well over 10% of web users, which would mean it would need to be pretty dang small given OS chrome, browser chrome, headers, etc - and then if you had thumnails across the bottom... Is all this overkill? When I look at galleries like the one at http://www.computer-darkroom.com/antarctica_2007/index.html in a maximized window on my hi-res monitor, I grow to really love the multiple rendition approach.

  • Web module: exporting keywords to a template not possible?

    I want to use the web module to generate my photoblog, however I need to be able to export the keywords or collections used to tag each image. The dialog box for changing the image caption allows you to export all sorts of EXIF and IPTC metadata but not the lightroom keywords.
    I've already made a template for my website but the generated xml file produced by lightroom for the transformer XSLT script to process seems to have no information about the image keywords in it so I'm stuck.
    I know the keywords are embedded into the actual jpegs that are exported but extracting them would be more effort than its worth, I dont want to have to run more software after exporting from the web module just to get the keywords.
    Any ideas?

    Looking at the XMP for a recent file, the keywords are stored as follows
         castle
         cloghan castle
         couple
         matrimony
         september
         wedding
    So you'd need to figure out how to extract them from there.

  • Keep exported image size in HTML as shown in PDF

    I have many inline formulas (imported from Word file via using mathtype) in PDF article made by ID. But when I export the articles as HTML, the images for formulas become much larger than shown in PDF version. How can i keep the exported images to the same size as they are shown the PDF file? I know I can edit the html file to specify image size, but that is the ideal work flow.
    Thank you.

    Hi Eric,
    If i'm getting you right. you have the formulas placed as the images.
    So, to keep the size fixed, In HTML export Options in image tab keep the image size as fixed.
    Snapshot to refer:
    Now you have image of same size as it appears in InDesign.

  • Web Module Export Settings

    I import as dng and then using these create collections which I upload to my website. The images look horrible. What internal settings does LR use when it takes the dng and does the conversion for the web?

    yes quality is at max 100, actually there seems to be quite a difference between the home page shot (ozphoto.org) of a model with her hand to her face vs the same shot in the gallery index under portrait.
    The home page is TTG Pages and the portrait is Slideshow Pro and in both of these I have used the best settings.
    Although in on my screen in the develop or library module on either one of my monitors the images are sharp?
    The web module and the web seems to be degraded

  • Export Image Size

    Okay, this is driving me crazy, and I can't find the answer anywhere:
    I'm working on a project that requires 300dpi JPGs at size 2.75" x 3.75".
    When I look at the document size in document setup, it shows up as 2.75" x 3.75". So far, so good.
    But when I try to export, the final image is 975 pixels by 1276 pixels. Which by my calculations ain't right. (Should wind up at 825 x 1125, no?)
    When I change the units to pixels in the Document Setup window by the way it reads at 198 x 270.
    Using CS3.
    What am I missing here? Is there an easy fix?

    Jack,
    I'm working on a project that requires 300dpi JPGs at size 2.75" x 3.75". 
    When I look at the document size in document setup, it shows up as 2.75" x 3.75". So far, so good.
    But when I try to export, the final image is 975 pixels by 1276 pixels. Which by my calculations ain't right. (Should wind up at 825 x 1125, no?)
    Correct.
    When I change the units to pixels in the Document Setup window by the way it reads at 198 x 270.
    This corresponds to 72 PPI, which is 2.75" by 3.75" expressed in pixels/points; this just expresses the actual size regardless of resolution.
     What am I missing here? Is there an easy fix?
    Are you creating vector artwork to export as JPEG at 300 PPI? If so, just set the resolution as part of exporting.
    Or are you working with a raster image (JPEG?) placed in Illy? If so, you cannot just change the resolution and expect the same quality.

  • Exporting Image Sizes

    When I make my movies, the images appear blury and yes I know it is because they are too small.
    The thing I wanted to ask is is there a way to keep the size the image as it originally was, rather than having to adjust itself to match the dimention?

    You could also use the built in hard drive publish services. Create two services, one for each location/size. Within each publish service, create a smart folder that refers to a single collection. Then dragging a photo to that one collection will queue the images for export in both services.
    You'd still have to visit each of the services to click "publish."
    Removing the images from the collection automatically deletes the from the hard drive on the next publish, also.
    mh++

  • Exported image size

    I shoot a canon 30D which produces RAW files about 7mb. When I export the versions as full size Jpegs, they get knocked to around 250kb! What is going on? That seems like an extreme amount of compression to me. Any ideas as to what I am doing wrong? Thanks
    HPL

    Go into the export presets and have a look at both the output dimensions and the compression settings.
    Ian

  • BUG: 16.0.1 Updating linked export image size does not update other dimension

    Hi
    Either this is a bug or I'm missing something.
    1. In AI CS6 16.0.1 (32-bit), click "Save for Web and Devices"
    2. Make sure W & H are linked
    3. Make a change to Image width
    4. Tab through to Image height - this should update? But it doesn't.
    5. Tab through to Percentage - height remains unchanged, but width is reset to original value.
    I thought height should update when I did this.
    Now try this:
    1. Cancel out of Save for W&D and come back in, then repeat Step 1 above
    2. Unlink and immediately relink width and height using the chain button
    3. Update width
    4. Tab through to height and hey presto, it updates now.
    So Save for W&D is not picking up the fact that "Retains original image proportions is checked" when the dialog is launched.
    Can anyone confirm this?
    Cheers
    Richard

    OK, this is a known bug. We'll take care of it!  Thanks
    See forum post:  
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/4314172#4314172
    Pattie

  • When I export from Lr to CS3 my image size is 8x12 roughly, why?

    I shoot RAW with a 5d mark2 I export from lr to cs3 in my workflow. I am wanting to create a gallery wrap at an image size of 24x36, when I go to create my negative space my exported image size from Lr is only 8x12, why would that be? I don't know what to do or how to make my image larger without loosing quality? I have never noticed this before? Why is it doing this now?

    It will be the settings in your export menu.
    clsmithphoto wrote:
    I shoot RAW with a 5d mark2 I export from lr to cs3 in my workflow. I am wanting to create a gallery wrap at an image size of 24x36, when I go to create my negative space my exported image size from Lr is only 8x12, why would that be? I don't know what to do or how to make my image larger without loosing quality? I have never noticed this before? Why is it doing this now?
    Check this out for how to export: http://tv.adobe.com/search/?q=exporting

  • Web Flash Gallery: Problem setting Large Images size

    When using the Lightroom Flash Gallery I am not able to change the size of the Large Images (Web | Appearance | Large Images | Size). When I set the size to Medium or Small, the large images always ends up with the same size as when set to Large. Only when setting the size to Extra Large there is a slight change in size.
    How can I change the Large Images size to Medium and Small?
    Jørgen Johanson

    jools2005 wrote:
    Adobe please address this issue.
    This is a User to User forum not official Adobe support. Yes, Adobe staff may participate from time to time, but not often enough that you can depend on them reading your post. Therefore, I suggest that you support a bug report using the facilities provided at https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

  • Trouble Exporting images in full size

    I can't seem to export an image with the original file size. I have reset the export image size to original jpeg settings and every setting I can find and it still exports a small low resolution file.

    The setting you are wanting to change is the "Size to" pull down menu,
    Original size is the original size of the file as cropped, uncropped you get pixel for pixel or if you happen to crop in on a small area of the image you will only get a small file.
    Fit within pixels, great for screen and video use, eg 1024x768 or 1920x1080 etc
    Fit within inches/centimeters, great for preset print sizes and creating different presets for different printers, eg. 10"x10" this is where dpi comes into effect.
    Percentage of original, smaller or larger.
    note that these settings do not crop the image or change a 2:3 image to a16:9 image, rather they constrain the image to fit within the dimensions. eg, I have an album of images to go to 5"x7" prints, vertical and horizontals, first I have to crop to 5x7, then I export to a preset that is 7"x7" @300dpi, this contrains the exported images to 7"@300dpi (2100pixels) on the longest side.
    Tony

  • Updating web module

    Hi everyone
    I am using LR 1.3 - Mac OX 10.4.X
    I have previously created a template in the web module from images that I loaded from the library.
    I then added this custom web module template and uploaded to my website.
    Everything works fine until I come to update the web gallery using this custom template.
    When I upload to the server or even export it, Lightroom is using the images and IPTC from the original template - in effect not updating the gallery on the browser.
    Do I need to delete the template and images from LR and start again, surely it is possible to update a saved custom template with new images, but I cannot see how.
    Thanks
    Eric Whitehead

    I'm a little confused by exactly what you're trying to do, but let me try to help.
    1) If you're trying to add images to an existing gallery on your website, it cannot be done. You need to recreate the entire gallery from scratch -- select all of the photos, generate and export the gallery -- and completely replace the existing gallery on your server.
    2) If you've selected images with which to create a gallery and moved to the Web module, the gallery should be generated. If you're attempting to apply a Template preset to the gallery, it should work ... UNLESS: You've updated the gallery to a newer version than that which was used to create the preset. Template presets need to be recreated when you update your gallery to a new version.
    Does that address your issue?

  • LR3-Library-Export-Image Resizing:  Specifying Pixel WxH results in different WxH - tips please?

    This is a multi-dimensional question (he he).  I understand my problem is related to the original/developed WxH ratio.  If the pixel WxH I spec in Export-Image Resizing doesn't match that developed proportion, the results are not what I want.  In other words LR3 keeps the original/developed proportion and not what I want for that export.  Ok, so I just answered my own question - but..... please give me some library or export tips for doing what I want to do.
    What I do:
    1 - I edit my images in RAW and like to keep them in their original proportions from my Canon camera as that is the proportion of HxW i use the most
    2 - Later, if the image is really good (at least I like it), I may export it for different purposes and then may choose or require a different proportion.
    3 - I would really like to not have to re-crop in Develop, then go back and Export, then go back to Develop and change it back to original. 
    Besides being tedious and time consuming, can anyone recommend a better way for me to do these "one off" exports (seems to happen more often lately) without screwing around in Develop and messing up my original work?
    Background:
    One of the reasons I do this is to create wallpapers for computers, for various printing/framing proportions, and then for web site situations.  Windows XP (and I think the others) gets really slow if the program must re-size an image for wallpaper (why? go ask Mr. Gates... better get in line).  So to keep performance high, it is best to create the image in the exact pixel dimensions of the monitor.  This is always some weird number and not like anything else I do this for.  The other reason is for a quick, custom print job for someone who wants an odd matting setup for framing (don't ask).  This results in odd proportions.  Regarding the web.... well smooshing a pic into a column etc. etc...    Now while I am proud of my art and understand LR3 will expect me to re-crop to preserve my artistic brilliance, but really..... I would be happy with a proportional crop from the parallel sides of the offending dimension.
    Also, when I spec a dimension, shouldn't the DPI gray out?  What am not understanding here?
    One last request: please give me tips on solving for world peace... this one really bugs me. 
    Thanx in advance! 

    Bruce,
    As you correctly noticed, the WxH ratio in export represents a canvas, into which the exported image is fit. Here are some illustrations on what the different settings mean:
    For what you are trying to achieve, you have to crop the image to the correct dimensions before doing the export. If I had to do it, I would create virtual copies of the original image as the last step and give each virtual copy its own crop, then export the virtual copies.
    Bruce in Philly wrote:
    Also, when I spec a dimension, shouldn't the DPI gray out?  What am not understanding here?
    The DPI resolution has no meaning for the size of the resulting image if you specify pixels in your export dimensions. But the resolution tag is written into the image, which might affect the way an image is printed, depending on the printing application.
    But if you specify your export dimensions in inches or cm, the resolution together with the dimensions in inch/cm determine the size of the resulting image in pixels. I.e. if you specify 5x7" and 300DPI, your exported images size will be 1500x2100 pixels.
    Beat

Maybe you are looking for