Web Redirection Problem on Cisco ISE 1.2 and WLC 7.5

Hello,
We are at initial phase of deploying ISE 1.2 in our environment for Wireless Guest Users.
I have configured ISE and WLC to talk to each other which is working fine. An SSID with MAC-Filtering is also configured on WLC and ACL only allowing ISE and DNS traffice.
I have configured proper authentication and authorization policies on ISE. Now, when I try to connect my device (laptop and android mobile), I see my device gets associated with the SSID (Demo) and gets the right IP Address from DHCP and right VLAN from WLC. The log process on ISE is as follows.
11001
Received RADIUS Access-Request
11017
RADIUS created a new session
11027
Detected Host Lookup UseCase (Service-Type = Call Check (10))
15049
Evaluating Policy Group
15008
Evaluating Service Selection Policy
15048
Queried PIP
15048
Queried PIP
15004
Matched rule
15041
Evaluating Identity Policy
15006
Matched Default Rule
15013
Selected Identity Source - Internal Endpoints
24210
Looking up User in Internal Users IDStore - B8:B4:2E:A6:7D:75
24216
The user is not found in the internal users identity store
24209
Looking up Endpoint in Internal Endpoints IDStore - B8:B4:2E:A6:7D:75
24211
Found Endpoint in Internal Endpoints IDStore
22037
Authentication Passed
15036
Evaluating Authorization Policy
15048
Queried PIP
15048
Queried PIP
15048
Queried PIP
15004
Matched rule - Guest Redirection
15016
Selected Authorization Profile - Test_Profile
11002
Returned RADIUS Access-Accept
I also see a redirect url in the detailed authentication logs. But the problem is that when I open my browser on my device, it doesn't get redirected to the guest portal url. Now since I can't get there, I can't continue with the rest of the process of authentication, COA and final ACL for internet access.
Can some one please either guide me the correct steps that I need to follow, if I have mis configured something or advise if this is a bug.
Thanks in advance.
Jay

The ACL is definitely used to define what traffic is re-directed to ISE and what traffic is not redirected. Having the permit-all statement at the end will break redirection. If you are using flex-connect then you will need to use flex-connect ACLs and apply those to the flex-connect APs. The links below should give you an idea of what needs to be done:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/5500-series-wireless-controllers/113606-byod-flexconnect-dg-000.html
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-services-engine/116087-configure-cwa-wlc-ise-00.html
Thank you for rating helpful posts!

Similar Messages

Problem to get Web admin access on cisco ISE

Hi,
We are currently having problems to access via Web admin UI to cisco ISE. after we put the password, we get this message on screen:
authentication failed due to zero RBAC group.
The ISE version that we are using is: 1.1.2.145 path 3
Do you have any idea about that?
Thank you for your attention on this matter.
Regards.

In Cisco ISE, RBAC policies are simple access control policies that use RBAC concepts to manage admin access. These RBAC policies are formulated to grant permissions to a set of administrators that belong to one or more admin group(s) that restrict or enable access to perform various administrative functions using the user interface menus and admin group data elements. I think there is problem with your RBAC policy configuration. Please follow the below link for help.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0/user_guide/ise10_man_identities.html#wp1282656
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0/user_guide/ise10_man_identities.html#wp1283009

I want to integrate SMS gateway to Cisco ISE 1.2 and my question is SMS notifications are supported for Guest self−registration

I want to integrate SMS gateway to Cisco ISE 1.2 and my question is
SMS notifications are supported for Guest self−registration Services ? or it should be done by Sponsor

I'm not sure I understand the question. Do you want to log in to the Sponsor Portal using AD credentials?
Create an Identity Source Sequence using AD as an Authentication Source. Go to Administration > Identity Management > Identity Source Sequences. Either Edit or +Add a Sequence and choose from the Authentication Sources shown.
Then choose that Identity Source Sequence by going to Administration > Web Portal Management > Settings. Double-click Sponsor from the Left Menu and click Authentication Source. Choose the Identity Source Sequence. Click Save.
I hope this helps.
Please Rate Helpful posts and mark this question as answered if, in fact, this does answer your question. Otherwise, feel free to post follow-up questions.
Charles Moreton

Cisco ISE 1.1 and IE9

Is anyone else having problems with ISE admin/monitoring pages not working properly under IE9? I just completed an upgrade to ISE 1.1, and it seems more and more, when I try to manage the system with IE9, I will get the following error (host name changed to protect the inocent). I dont know if this is truly an IE9 issue, or the chrome plug-in we are forced to use. Works perfect under Firefox 11.0.
This webpage is not available
The webpage at https://iseserver.domain.com/mnt/pages/dashboard/dashboard.jsp?mnt_config_write=true&token=BEGIN_TOKENXspmm4x5AwFsV6NExIBAVA==END_TOKEN might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address.
Error 103 (net::ERR_CONNECTION_ABORTED): Unknown error.

Supported Administrative User Interface Browsers
You can access the Cisco ISE administrative user interface using the following browsers:
•Mozilla Firefox 3.6 (applicable for Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux-based operating systems)
•Mozilla FireFox 9 (applicable for Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux-based operating systems)
•Windows Internet Explorer 8
•Windows Internet Explorer 9 (in Internet Explorer 8 compatibility mode)
Cisco ISE GUI is not supported on Internet Explorer version 8 running in Internet Explorer 7 compatibility mode. For a collection of known issues regarding Windows Internet Explorer 8, see the "Known Issues" section of the Release Notes for the Cisco Identity Services Engine, Release 1.1.

Cisco ISE 1.2 and AD Group

Hello,
I have Cisco ISE installed on my EXSi server for my test pilot. I have added several AD groups to ISE as well.
I have created an Authorization policy condition, which is WIRELESS_DOT1X_USERS (see screenshot)
Basically, I just duplicated the default Wireless_802.1X and added Network Access:EapAuthentication, Equals, EAP-TLS.
My problem is, I was unable to join the wireless network if I added my AD group to the Authorization policy (see screenshot). The user that I have is a member of WLAN-USERS. If I removed the AD group from the Authorization policy, the use is able to join the wireless network.
I attached the ISE logs screenshot as well. I checked the ISE, AD/NPS, WLC, laptop time and date, and they are all in synched.
I also have the WLC added as NPS client on my network.
I checked the AD log and what I found was the WLCs local management user trying to authenticate. It is supposed to be my wireless user credential not the WLC.
This is the log that I got from the AD/NPS
Network Policy Server denied access to a user.
Contact the Network Policy Server administrator for more information.
User:
Security ID:                              NULL SID
Account Name:                              admin
Account Domain:                              AAENG
Fully Qualified Account Name:          AAENG\admin
Client Machine:
Security ID:                              NULL SID
Account Name:                              -
Fully Qualified Account Name:          -
OS-Version:                              -
Called Station Identifier:                    -
Calling Station Identifier:                    -
NAS:
NAS IPv4 Address:                    172.28.255.42
NAS IPv6 Address:                    -
NAS Identifier:                              RK3W5508-01
NAS Port-Type:                              -
NAS Port:                              -
RADIUS Client:
Client Friendly Name:                    RK3W5508-01
Client IP Address:                              172.28.255.42
Authentication Details:
Connection Request Policy Name:          Use Windows authentication for all users
Network Policy Name:                    -
Authentication Provider:                    Windows
Authentication Server:                    WIN-RSTMIMB7F45.aaeng.local
Authentication Type:                    PAP
EAP Type:                              -
Account Session Identifier:                    -
Logging Results:                              Accounting information was written to the local log file.
Reason Code:                              16
Reason:                                        Authentication failed due to a user credentials mismatch. Either the user name provided does not map to an existing user account or the password was incorrect.

Thank you Tarik,
I got my AD group working. What I did, I checked the user's certificate that is installed on the laptop then modified the ISE certificate authentication profile to "Subject Alternative Name". I had the ISE set to common name when I was having an issue.
I forgot to mentioned that I have to servers in my ISE test pilot. I have AD with NPS, and CA. These servers are Windows 2008 R2.
I am a little confuse about the attribute in certificate template you have mentioned. Is that located at Certificate Authority/server-name/Certificate Templates/Users? I am not sure where to look for that attribute on the CA server.

Cisco ISE posture assesment and client provisioning

Hello,
I have Cisco ISE and Cisco IOS device. I have configured RADIUS in between these device.
Also I have configured RADIUSbetween Cisco ISE and Cisco ASA. Now I want to know that how to do posture assesment for these devices(Cisco ISE and Cisco ASA or Cisco ISE and Cisco IOS). Please give me whole steps to do posture assesment for cisco ios device in Cisco ise.
Also, please provide me logs related to posture assesment and client provisioning.
Thanks in advance.

You may go through the below listed link to download a PDF link
Posture assessment with ISE.
http://www.cisco.com/web/CZ/expo2012/pdf/T_SECA4_ISE_Posture_Gorgy_Acs.pdf
~BR
Jatin Katyal
**Do rate helpful posts**

Cisco ISE 1.2 and Cisco ACS 5.4 patch 6 and support for snmp version 3

does anyone know if cisco ISE version 1.2 patch 8 and Cisco ACS 5.4 patch 6 support snmp version 3?
ciscoISE/admin(config)# snmp-server ?
community Set community string
contact    Text for mib object sysContact
host       Specify hosts to receive SNMP notifications
location   Text for mib object sysLocation
ciscoISE/admin(config)# snmp-server
Ciscoacs/admin(config)# snmp-server ?
community Set community string
contact    Text for mib object sysContact
host       Specify hosts to receive SNMP notifications
location   Text for mib object sysLocation
Ciscoacs/admin(config)# snmp-server

No support SNMP v3 on ISE v1.2 and 1.3 except for profilling
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-2/cli_ref_guide/ise_cli/ise_cli_app_a.html#12768
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-3/cli_ref_guide/b_ise_CLIReferenceGuide/b_ise_CLIReferenceGuide_chapter_0100.html#ID-1364-00000d30

Cisco ISE with TACACS+ and RADIUS both?

Hello,
I am initiating wired authentication on an existing network using Cisco ISE. I have been studying the requirements for this. I know I have to turn on RADIUS on the Cisco switches on the network. The switches on the network are already programmed for TACACS+. Does anybody know if they can both operate on the same network at the same time?
Bob

Hello Robert,
I believe NO, they both won't work together as both TACACS and Radius are different technologies.
It's just because that TACACS encrypts the whole message and Radius just the password, so I believe it won't work.
For your reference, I am sharing the link for the difference between TACACS and Radius.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk59/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094e99.shtml
Moreover, Please review the information as well.
Compare TACACS+ and RADIUS
These sections compare several features of TACACS+ and RADIUS.
UDP and TCP
RADIUS uses UDP while TACACS+ uses TCP. TCP offers several advantages over UDP. TCP offers a connection-oriented transport, while UDP offers best-effort delivery. RADIUS requires additional programmable variables such as re-transmit attempts and time-outs to compensate for best-effort transport, but it lacks the level of built-in support that a
TCP transport offers:
TCP usage provides a separate acknowledgment that a request has been received, within (approximately) a network round-trip time (RTT), regardless of how loaded and slow the backend authentication mechanism (a TCP acknowledgment) might be.
TCP provides immediate indication of a crashed, or not running, server by a reset (RST). You can determine when a server crashes and returns to service if you use long-lived TCP connections. UDP cannot tell the difference between a server that is down, a slow server, and a non-existent server.
Using TCP keepalives, server crashes can be detected out-of-band with actual requests. Connections to multiple servers can be maintained simultaneously, and you only need to send messages to the ones that are known to be up and running.
TCP is more scalable and adapts to growing, as well as congested, networks.
Packet Encryption
RADIUS encrypts only the password in the access-request packet, from the client to the server. The remainder of the packet is unencrypted. Other information, such as username, authorized services, and accounting, can be captured by a third party.
TACACS+ encrypts the entire body of the packet but leaves a standard TACACS+ header. Within the header is a field that indicates whether the body is encrypted or not. For debugging purposes, it is useful to have the body of the packets unencrypted. However, during normal operation, the body of the packet is fully encrypted for more secure communications.
Authentication and Authorization
RADIUS combines authentication and authorization. The access-accept packets sent by the RADIUS server to the client contain authorization information. This makes it difficult to decouple authentication and authorization.
TACACS+ uses the AAA architecture, which separates AAA. This allows separate authentication solutions that can still use TACACS+ for authorization and accounting. For example, with TACACS+, it is possible to use Kerberos authentication and TACACS+ authorization and accounting. After a NAS authenticates on a Kerberos server, it requests authorization information from a TACACS+ server without having to re-authenticate. The NAS informs the TACACS+ server that it has successfully authenticated on a Kerberos server, and the server then provides authorization information.
During a session, if additional authorization checking is needed, the access server checks with a TACACS+ server to determine if the user is granted permission to use a particular command. This provides greater control over the commands that can be executed on the access server while decoupling from the authentication mechanism.
Multiprotocol Support
RADIUS does not support these protocols:
AppleTalk Remote Access (ARA) protocol
NetBIOS Frame Protocol Control protocol
Novell Asynchronous Services Interface (NASI)
X.25 PAD connection
TACACS+ offers multiprotocol support.
Router Management
RADIUS does not allow users to control which commands can be executed on a router and which cannot. Therefore, RADIUS is not as useful for router management or as flexible for terminal services.
TACACS+ provides two methods to control the authorization of router commands on a per-user or per-group basis. The first method is to assign privilege levels to commands and have the router verify with the TACACS+ server whether or not the user is authorized at the specified privilege level. The second method is to explicitly specify in the TACACS+ server, on a per-user or per-group basis, the commands that are allowed.
Interoperability
Due to various interpretations of the RADIUS Request for Comments (RFCs), compliance with the RADIUS RFCs does not guarantee interoperability. Even though several vendors implement RADIUS clients, this does not mean they are interoperable. Cisco implements most RADIUS attributes and consistently adds more. If customers use only the standard RADIUS attributes in their servers, they can interoperate between several vendors as long as these vendors implement the same attributes. However, many vendors implement extensions that are proprietary attributes. If a customer uses one of these vendor-specific extended attributes, interoperability is not possible.
Traffic
Due to the previously cited differences between TACACS+ and RADIUS, the amount of traffic generated between the client and server differs. These examples illustrate the traffic between the client and server for TACACS+ and RADIUS when used for router management with authentication, exec authorization, command authorization (which RADIUS cannot do), exec accounting, and command accounting (which RADIUS cannot do).

Cisco ISE: Dot1x failing and MAB succeeded (Intermittent) /or Posture Delay

Hi,
We are running the cisco ise 1.1.3 and configured for the Dot1x and MAB authentications. PC's are getting access through MAB while Dot1x failing again and again. But, sometime, same PC is getting authenticating via Dot1x. Connectivity is intermittent. Also, sometimes, stucks longer in Posture
We have three different switches at the moment with the latest IOS version.
1) WS-C4507R-E = 15.1(2)SG,
2) WS-C3560-48PS = 12.2(55)SE7
3) WS-C3750X-24P = 15.0(2)SE1
Could you anyone pitch the idea? or advise about the latest IOS for the switches.
Let me know, if you need more information.
Thanks,
Regards,
Mubahser

It seems your PCs are failing dot1x and also failing MAB authentication, the switch by default will start the process again and will again fail dot1x and MAB authentication, and so on.
It will be helpful to see the logs from both the switch and the radius servers (i take it is ACS or ISE). Also the configuration of the radius server.

ISE 1.2 and WLC 7.4 Stability

We are deploying ISE 1.2 for wireless only and have been experiencing a lot of issues with central web auth on controllers on version 7.4MR2. It appears we are hitting a bug, but I am curious what others on ISE 1.2 have found as the best stable WLC code to use? Has anyone been experiencing issues on 7.4 specific to CWA and web redirect? We are encountering a problem where users are getting constantly thrown back to the guest portal page after about 5 to 10 minutes after successfully logging in. Thanks.

Hi,
I have been running 7.4.115.0 on a production system for over 6 months with no visible issues. The 7.4.115.0 patch is a special release to fix Apple iOS7 captive portal bypass. Other than that, 7.4.110.0 was pretty stable.
You might consider changing the Guest WLAN session timeout on the advanced page on the WLAN in the WLC to a higher number which may fix your re-authentication issue every 5-10 minutes.

ISE 1.04 and WLC 7.2 - CWA Config?

Hello, I'm currently deploying a POC for Central WebAuthentication with the new 7.2 Wireless Lan Controller code.
I'm aware of the differences between LWA and CWA in Catalyst Switches, but I'm having trouble grasping how to configure the CWA on the WLC for wireless guests with open web auth.
For LWA I did get:
1- User opens browser
2- WLC redirects user to ISE Guest page
3- ISE Guest page sends username/password to WLC,
4- WLC does a RADIUS PAP request to ISE in order to authenticate user.
5- ISE authenticates (or not) and send Access-Accept to WLC
6- WLC lets user go through.
For CWA the way I see it, it should be:
1- User opens browser
2- WLC redirects user to ISE Guest page
3- ISE Guest page processes username/password internally
4- ISE authenticates (or not) and sends Access-Accept to WLC
5- WLC lets user go through.
The way I see it, we should define a WLAN's L3 security policy as webauth, with no L2 security, but the question is how to configure the controller so that the ISE doesn't just serve as an external web server and the WLC is not waiting for a username/password from this external webserver, as would LWA work, but instead just gets an Access-Accept from the ISE.
For the moment LWA is more intuitive given the WLC philosophy of operation. I'm not really seeing how/where to configure 7.2 code to just expect an access-accept from ISE.
Can anybody enlighten me on how this should be configured/work?
Any insight is very much appreciated.
Thanks
Gustavo Novais

Hi Brian,
Complementing Nicolas Darchis idea:
On SSID Security settings, set Open Authentication and check the MAC Filtering box, do NOT check any type of L3 authentication.
Then define your RADIUS/ISE servers (enable support for RFC 5734 when defining them) on the SSID, and on the advanced tab of the ssid, enable RADIUS NAC (and aaa override too).
It is exactly the same thing as when you do RADIUS based mac authentication, except on this case, the RADIUS server will reply with an access-accept + a few attributes (namely airespace-acl/vlan/url-redirect).
On the ISE, you'll need to match service type: call-check (MAB) RADIUS authentication in order to match requests coming from WLC CWA.
Then the order will be the exact same as for a switch:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0/user_guide/ise10_guest_pol.html#wp1112855
I needed to put the redirect access-list referenced on ISE CWA, statically on the WLC as a pre-auth ACL (you'll need to define it statically on the WLC - security access-lists).
Nicolas, I've seen trustsec design guide 2.0 but no CWA on wireless was included... do you have any idea if will it be on trustsec 2.1?
Thanks & Regards
Gustavo

Issues getting url-redirect working with Cisco ISE

Hi,
I am currently doing a Proof of Concept using Cisco's new ISE product. I am having issues getting the url-redirect raidus attribute working. I have read the troubleshooting document and everything in it points to it should be working. By debuging the radius information on the switch I can see that its passing the url-redirect to the switch which in my case is was https://DEVLABISE01.devlab.local:8443/guestportal/gateway?sessionId=0A00020A0000001604D3F5BE&action=cwa. Now to remove DNS issues etc from the equasion if I copy and paste this URL into the client browser it takes me to the correct place, and I can login and it changes VLAN's accordingly. Now as far as I know the client should automatticaly be redirected to this URL which is not working. Below I have included one of the debugs to show that the epm is in place.
DEVLABSW01#show epm session ip 10.0.1.104
    Admission feature: DOT1X
              ACS ACL: xACSACLx-IP-PRE-POSTURE-ACL-4de86e6c
     URL Redirect ACL: ACL-WEBAUTH-REDIRECT
         URL Redirect: https://DEVLABISE01.devlab.local:8443/guestportal/gateway?sessionId=0A00020A0000001604D3F5BE&action=cwa
I have also attached my switch config. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Dan

So im also doing ISE for the first time and i knew it may have been a bit tough however i didnt forsee my following issue.
everything is working as expected other than every now and then (intermittent) the ISE Central Portal does not display on any device -android, windows, etc..... i checked and checked the configs, had probably about 10 TAC cases open..... this weekend i ripped out the main components, setup in the offfice and tried to replicate the issue....i could...what i noticed is that without Internet the ISE Portal didnt actually display....it sounds weird but thats what im seeing.....As soon as i plug into Internet Link into the equation, the portal page comes up.....im able to replicate it every time... Currently, i placed back into the customer network and im now looking down at the routing/firewall......
my issue is that i cant really explain why the Internet affects the Central Auth Page.... In any event. im working backwards, tomorrow im bringing in a second link and doing NAT on a cisco router to bypass the checkpoint firewall....ill know if its checkpoint or if im barking up the wrong tree....
if anyone can explain why, it would help out a great deal..
My setup BTW is
1. WLC 5760 - Not latest code but latest stable (recommended by the TAC Engineer)
2. ISE 1.2 - Doing simple Wireless only implementation
3. 3650 - Just acting like a switch - no ACLs etc - just a switch
4. Integrated into AD
Ill post back with any findings if i make any headway - BTW, i didnt like this at all as other solutions are so much simpler, BUT, i can now see how powerful this could potentially be for the right type of customer...
thanks again how i can get some feedback

Cisco ISE 1.2 and 2 Active Directory Domains

Hi Support,
does anyone know whether I can perform Certificate Authentication for two different Active Directory domains using the same ISE host / deployment?
We have two forests with a trust link between them.
We have a seperate PKI in each domain.
I am thinking that the ISE can only be joined to a single domain, but because we have a trust between the two forests, the ISE can have two certificate profiles in an identity source sequence which can then use in a single authorisation policy.
I take it that I would need local certs from each CA in the local certificate store of the ISE?
We are performing a company merger and we cannot migrate users to the primary AD domain due to several reasons so we would like to use the same ISE deployment to authenticate Wireless users on both AD domains.
Thanks
Mario

Mario,
This is possible. Here are the guidelines for the Multi-Forest support in ISE 1.2:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-2/user_guide/ise_user_guide/ise_man_id_stores.html#pgfId-1350874
You would have to set a new Certificate Authentication Profile for each domain and use the Authentication Policies to determine which of the Certificate Authentication Profiles to use.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-2/user_guide/ise_user_guide/ise_man_id_stores.html#pgfId-1349174
Please Rate Helpful posts and mark this question as answered if, in fact, this does answer your question. Otherwise, feel free to post follow-up questions.
Charles Moreton

Cisco ISE 1.2 and Symantec Endpoint Protection

Hi Experts,
Good Day!
I'm just wondering if ISE 1.2 is able to detect an application/software in a laptop like the Symantec Endpoint Protection before giving the user an access to the network? Is it possible?
I tried to searched over the internet however, I can't find any documentation about it.
Thank you for your support.
Cheers,
Niks

hello ,have you checked posturing service of ISE , with ISE posture service enabled you can check Antivirus Installation , Antivirus Version/ Antivirus Definition Date etc . Check the following link for different Posture Assessment Options available
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/security/ise/1.2/user_guide/ise_pos_pol.html#wp2276381

Cisco ISE NDES EAP and HTTP certificates from different CA

Hi guys, hope this is something you can help with…
2 x ISE 1.2 (patch 5) 3415 appliances with hostnames webproxy1.customerdomain.com and webproxy2.customerdomain.com
AD integration with customerdomain.local
Guest authentication (CWA) using a separate interface on the ISE appliance (Gigabit 1) routing into its own VRF for isolation
Corporate authentication is using EAP-TLS which is working fine
BYOD using NSP with SCEP for iPads only at this stage using NDES on <customerdomain.local>
I have installed a signed GlobalSign server certificate for HTTPS for guests (with SAN fields webproxy1.customerdomain.com and webproxy2.customerdomain.com)
I have also installed a signed server certificate from the customer's CA for EAP (with CN of psn.customerdomain.local and SAN fields psn.customerdomain.local , webproxy1.customerdomain.com and webproxy2.customerdomain.com)
The issue I have is if the two certificates are assigned for EAP and HTTP respectively the NSP process fails to generate a certificate though SCEP to the NDES server.
As soon as I use the same internally signed certificate for HTTP and EAP it works, this then causes a problem with the HTTPS certificate being trusted by guests.
This does not work with the GlobalSign certificate being used for both HTTPS and EAP, only the internal one works.
Can you confirm if it is a valid design to have the ISE use one certificate for HTTPS and another for EAP signed by different CAs, it appears it has to be the internal CA used in the SCEP process to work.
Thanks
Andy

I have now tested this with a test HTTP cert signed by a public CA and an EAP cert signed by my internal and SCEP works fine. I am wondering if this is a certificate tier length issue. My working example has a RootCA->IssuingCA->Cert. It fails with a cert with a 3-tier heirarchy RootCA->IntermediateCA->IssuingCA->Cert.
Can anyone confirm this works on other deployments with a 3-tier certificate chain with SCEP?
Thanks

Web Redirection Problem on Cisco ISE 1.2 and WLC 7.5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for