Webceneter content patch and Webcenter capture patches

Hi Expert,
There is latest patch for webcenter capture is :
Patch for Bug 19856709  Date:  12/08/2014   CUMULATIVE Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture PATCH 11.1.1.8.0 NUMBER 7
  and there is an another latest bundle patch for webcenter content is :
Patch 20022599: WEBCENTER CONTENT BUNDLE PATCH 11.1.1.8.9-01/20/2015
my question is : Does webcenter content budle patch released on 01/20/2015 included webcenter capture patch or not ?

Hi,
The answer is NO. The WebCenter Content patch includes only WebCenter Content bug fixes. You may refer to the readme file or search for the patch number in support site to know the list of bugs fixed. I have verified the list and it does not include the WebCenter Capture bug 19856709.
HTH
- Anand

Similar Messages

  • I have installed the patch for output. it still doesn't work i am running windows 8.1 i have tryed the 32bit patch and the 64bit patch it still will not show up in workspace.

    I am running Windows 8.1 i have installed the 32bit patch and the 64bit patch and neither one works. there is nothing in the workspace folder to delete. HELP!!! college student and campus running mac computers.

    I am having the exact same problem and have tried everyone thing it is driving me crazy if you hear of anything that works let me know i would be very grateful.

  • Content server and webcenter pages

    hi all,
    Can any one point to example where webcenter is getting content (text content typically u see on websites for example like amazzon, OR ebayy) stored some content repository (UCM, Documentum etc) and is rendering it as web content (HTML) in webcenter page ?
    all examples I see is about showing the list of files (bunch of .doc .txt .xls .word etc ) on the webcenter page.
    we do not want to see the folder and list of files in folder. we want tobe able to see the content delivered as web page (HTML) on Webcenter page.
    any link, idea ?
    thx
    d

    Hello d,
    we have the same problem (we want to connect to UCM, not sure about our DMSs) and here is the answer I got from the product management:
    PS3 has this out-of-the-box.
    you can check it out in a nightly build: http://webcenter-dev.us.oracle.com/workplacenightlybuild.html
    I'm afraid the system is oracle internal, so you might not be able to reach it.
    Still, hope it helps a little.
    Regards, Jiri

  • Interim patch and One-off patch

    DB version : 11.2
    In oracle terminology, Interim patch is same as one-off patch. Right?

    Hi;
    >
    In oracle terminology, Interim patch is same as one-off patch. Right?An Interim Patch (formerly known as a “one-off” patch) is a bug fix (or set of fixes) made available to customers who for business reasons cannot wait until the next Patch Set or new product release to get a fix.
    PS:Please dont forget to change thread status to answered if it possible when u belive your thread has been answered, it pretend to lose time of other forums user while they are searching open question which is not answered,thanks for understanding
    Regard
    Helios

  • OS and DB Security patches and updates

    Dear Experts,
    We are going through SOX audits. Auditor is asking me about applied latest OS and Oracle patches to secure SAP systems from threats and attacks.
    I told them that we are running on Solaris 9 with Oracle 9.2.0.5
    and our severs are behind CHECKPOINT Firewall, and also we have never faced any security breaches and threats and also not facing any performance and efficiency problems in our system.
    However, they still persist me about critical security patches for Solaris and Oracle.
    Please tell me should I go for applying security patches of Solaris or Oracle if any. I am very worried about possible problems after applying of those security patches.
    Please guide me about this issue and tell me about proven and trusted security patches for Solaris 9 and Oracle 9.2.0.5
    Best Regards
    Waqas Ahmad

    > I told them that we are running on Solaris 9 with Oracle 9.2.0.5
    First I would like to tell you that your current Oracle version is out of extended support (see SAP on Oracle and the notes the first chapter points to). To get actual (security) patches I would highly recommend upgrading to 10.2.0.4.
    > However, they still persist me about critical security patches for Solaris and Oracle.
    They do that because most of the "attacks" to server come from internal users, not from external.
    > Please guide me about this issue and tell me about proven and trusted security patches for Solaris 9 and Oracle 9.2.0.5
    For the operating system I would use pca (Patch Check Advanced) - a free too to download and install patches - works like charm (http://www.par.univie.ac.at/solaris/pca/). It can be configured to only download and install security relevant patches.
    For Oracle you should install the latest patchset (for 9.2 it's 9.2.0.8 and all the necessary interim patches) and the critical patch updates. However, those CPUs may conflict with necessary other patches so you can either use CPU or the necessary interim patches.
    Check note 938986 - Oracle Database 9.2: Patches for 9.2.0
    Markus

  • PSU patching and backup

    Hello,
    When applying PSU patches and other interim patches, would you guys say it's necessary to backup the Oracle Home in question and the central inventory before applying the patch?
    I know that the patch is stored in the .patch_storage directory so that Opatch can roll it back at a later point. Would this suffice or do you recommend a separate backup of the binaries and inventory as well?
    thanks.

    MrShh wrote:
    Hello,
    When applying PSU patches and other interim patches, would you guys say it's necessary to backup the Oracle Home in question and the central inventory before applying the patch?
    I know that the patch is stored in the .patch_storage directory so that Opatch can roll it back at a later point. Would this suffice or do you recommend a separate backup of the binaries and inventory as well?
    thanks.Yes always.
    If in case of relinking you have any issue. In less cases which cannot be rolledback.
    So always take ORACLE_HOM & Inventory backup too when all services(instance & listeners..) are down,

  • Difference between Rollup patch and family pack

    Hi all,
    thanks in advance to you all who helps me out with this question
    can any one differentiate between Rollup patch and Family pack patch.
    thanks,
    Vamshi.D

    In addition to the above ...
    Rollup Patch (RUP): An aggregation of patches that may be at the functional level, or at a specific product/family release level. For example, a Flexfields rollup patch contains all the latest patches related to Flexfields at the time the patch was created. A Marketing Family 11.5.10 rollup patch contains all the latest Marketing patches released since, and applicable to 11.5.10
    Family Pack: An aggregation of patches at the product family level. Family product codes always end in "_PF" and family packs are given alphabetical sequence such as 11i.HR_PF.B, 11i.HR_PF.C, and 11i.HR_PF.D. Family packs are cumulative. In other words, Discrete Manufacturing Family Pack G (11i.DMF_PF.G) contains everything in 11i.DMF_PF.F, which contains everything in 11i.DMF_PF.E, and so on.
    If you search the rollup patch thru Metalink, it would tell you whether it is included in any other patchset (i.e. Family Pack) or not.

  • PSU and One-off patching on GRID Home

    Grid Infrastructure Version: 11.2.0.2
    Question1.
    Do you apply one-off patches for GI HOME? I have only applied PSUs on Grid Home . I have never applied a one-off patch on a Grid HOME.
    So, I thought of downloading a GRID related one-off patch for AIX . So, I looked for
    12767231 - AIX-11202-GIPC DISABLE SWITCH PORT FOR ONE PRIVATE NIC,HAIP DID NOT FAILOVERwhich is part of GI PSU 11.2.0.2.4 ( 12827731).
    But when I searched for the one-off patch 12767231 in patch search in Metalink, I couldn't find the patch download for this particular bug.
    I think you can apply this one-off patch only as a part of PSU. Right?
    Question2.
    Why on earth should I apply GI's PSU(or one-off patch) on RDBMS_HOME or vice versa?
    RAC Databases run on the top of CRS stack.
    Although related ,both GRID HOME and RDBMS HOME contain different binary files doing different things. So why should we apply GI's PSU/one-off patch on RDBMS_HOME and RDBMS_HOME's PSU on GRID Infrastructure HOME?
    Question3.
    We install grid using Grid Installer GUI. When doing a fresh installation of 11.2.0.2 or 11.2.0.3 in a new server , I want to apply its latest PSU as well. When should I do this PSU patching ?
    A. Before running root.sh ?
    One of last screens we get in Grid Installation is where the installer prompts you to run root.sh (see the screenshot below)
    http://husnusensoy.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/camtasiastudio351.png
    Should I do the PSU patching now ? ie just before executing root.sh ?
    B. or After running root.sh ? ie. After the whole Grid Installation is succesfully complete ?
    Edited by: spiral on 05-Jun-2012 17:16

    Hello There.
    for question number 3. What I do is this:
    1. Execute runinstaller for grid, choose to check for patches, and put those patches in a folder, the next install don't need to go to internet, and reuse the 2 downloaded patches avaliable as today for 11.2.0.3.
    2. patch GI (Grid Infrastucture home)
    3. Install DB Binaries, no db creation
    4. Patch DB Binaries
    5. Create DB using dbca.
    hope this helps.

  • Ucm and Webcenter Interaction 10gR4

    I'm trying to find information on how to integrate Webcenter Content(UCM) and Webcenter Interaction 10gR4. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Steve
    Edited by: Tiger on Oct 24, 2012 3:40 AM

    I'm trying to find information on how to integrate Webcenter Content(UCM) and Webcenter Interaction 10gR4. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Steve
    Edited by: Tiger on Oct 24, 2012 3:40 AM

  • SunSolve Issues and Problem Downloading Patches

    Signed up for a SunSolve account a couple days ago and then purchased a 1 Year Standard Subscription today so that I could download patches and what-not.
    I activated the subscription and then added it to my SunSolve account.
    I then tried to download some patches like the one below with no success.
    NAME: Solaris 10_x86 Recommended Patch Cluster
    DATE: Aug/13/07
    When I try to download a patch I get the following message across the top of the window.
    You are logged in to SunSolve but are not associated with a valid contract. You have access to Free Patches and Content only.
    I have had no luck with phone calls or emails I need some help ASAP as I have to ship this server out tomorrow.

    I'm afraid that this forum is for issues with patch manager/smpatch/update manager.
    You may want to send an email to [email protected] for support in this matter.

  • Patches and pre-task to upgrade from 12.1.1 to 12.1.3

    I have a few questions regarding to pre-required patches and pre-tasks in order to upgrade from 12.1.1 to 12.1.3.
    Currently, the system is on 12.1.1 and pre-required patch, 9039089 which is for R12.AD.B.delta.3 code level.
    But, when I checked the document, Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1.3 Readme [ID 1080973.1]...
    Q1.
    contents deleted.
    However, the document 761570.1 is about the necessary steps of upgrade from 11i to 12.1.3.
    Is this necessary/applicable still for my case as well?
    Q2.
    content deleted.
    However, R12.1.1 already comes with 10.1.2 and 10.1.3 for the application server.
    Is it needed to have these AS10g patches still in this case?
    Q3.
    In short, what patches/steps are needed when I upgrade from 12.1.1 to 12.1.3 after all...? Followings are the ones I identified.
    9239089
    9239090
    9239095
    9817770
    9966055
    So, is it sufficient to apply 9239089 for R12.AD.B.delta.3 code level, and continue with 9239090 (12.1.3 pack patch)?
    Thanks in advance for the help.

    Please follow note 1080973.1 and perform all patching on the forms, web and database tiers. There are a number of patches to apply to meet the requirements to upgrade.
    Please follow R12.1 Oracle Financials Critical Patches note 954704.1 for post install critical patches on top of 12.1.3.
    You will also need to follow support note HRMS (HR Global) Legislative Data Patch 145837.1 if implemented.
    If you use Patch Wizard then you will need to apply patch 10629956. Please review New Required Patches for Patch Wizard, Patch Manager, and Oracle Application Change Management Pack note 1267768.1.
    For best results and all steps recommended by support, please download the Maintenance Wizard tool. This tool will automate most of the upgrade steps and guide you step by step, only applying patches that are required for your installation.
    Maintenance Wizard Overview note 215527.1

  • PREEMPT_RT patch and Arch

    Hello All,
    I'm wondering if anyone has toyed around with the PREEMPT_RT patch using the Arch concept to simplify the processes to accommodate non-critical motion control across wireless or local area networks as a server for applications such as security cameras, thresholds, landscape automation, environmental controls, etc. There are also several commercial applications that might be reasonably run through the hybrid RT capabilities of a adapted timer and a preempted Linux kernel with an ultra-lean Arch config.
    I'm a newbie and interested in finding out what I don't know before I throw a bunch of time at a flawed concept. I've been linux lurking for quite a while hoping to find a really lean operating system and overhead that retains the dual characteristics of general motion control and networking. These could be used in any number of closed loop commutation and synchronization schemes to afford relatively accurate positioning at long distances and communicate the result.
    Obviously this could be accomplished with enough money to buy gear and canned (black box) applications but the cost of repetitive installation pales even the bravest entrepreneur. So, the search continues.
    Is there any inherent reason that Arch and the RT patched kernel won't work together? Most of the pengutronic stuff I've been reading is a little dated. Admittedly, I may have just outed my lengthy lurk in a spasm of sheer excitement that this may be the one. But I thought I might just simply ask before I work my way to another dead end.
    Anyone?

    Let me say up front...    personally I have no idea. You could always simply try it and see if it works!
    That said, my reason for posting is to say, you might get better traffic on this question in another part of the forum, since this has very little to do with differing architectures. Your best bet might actually be the Networking, Server, and Protection area since your basically talking about setting up a server designed to control security cameras, or the Kernel & Hardware Issues area, since you are asking specifically about a kernel patch.
    I got curious and googled the patch you're talking about...   I am fairly sure it should work for Arch, since it seems to be very distro agnostic.
    I am curious about why you feel the rt patch would help with motion control over a network...   it is aimed at working with microsecond timings, than longer term workloads. RT is only really useful (right now) for really short units of work in response to real time events. Basically, if you want to hit a bug's wing that was spotted on a camera with a high powered, very narrow focused laser, then an RT kernel might help you. An RT kernel is aimed at starting up responses really fast. Unless you are responding to something captured by the cameras, and less than a tenth of a millisecond is necessary to that response, a normal "real-fast" kernel might be a better idea.
    http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/real … 06.22a.pdf
    There is a link to a white paper about the RT-Kernel and the Preempt_RT patch set. It's 9 PDF pages, but if you want to just skim it, the summery has a nice decision tree to help make the choice between real-time patch and the vanilla "real fast" kernel.
    The RT-patchset might actually be more work than strictly needed for the concept you're working on.
    It seems to me, and I am far from a Guru or an expert, that what you are hunting for is a motion capture application that can easily be network controlled and is open-source. You need a low overhead OS to give all of the system resources to the motion capturing program. Arch is good for low overhead, and there is the package zoneminder in the AUR (Also with the zmviewer-svn that adds a client capacity to the suite, meaning you can look at/control them from another computer).
    You may want to look at Linux-From-Scratch to make an absolutely basic system on the hardware you wish to use for this enterprise. You can strip out all of the unneeded drivers from the kernel, locales, manpages, build tools, and all of the other cruft that is needed by the average install of any Linux OS meant to run on diverse groups of hardware.
    By the way, the Linux-From-Scratch would allow you to custom compile and thoroughly test each update before sending them out as binaries to your customers, as well as allowing you to do complete upgrades rather than piecemeal updates to each program on the system as they come available. (Business like the set time table for releases because of the lower amount of downtime for the critical systems.)
    Last edited by LeoSolaris (2009-05-11 14:49:41)

  • Urgent: About Comps.xml - Patchset, Patches and Components details.

    Hi,
    In Comps.xml [in Oracle_Home\Inventory\ContentsXML folder] we have information about Patchsets, Patches and Components. According to my information
    I. TL_List: It has a list of all the patchset installed.
    But when I looked in Comps.xml TL_List, I found that it contain two nodes
    II. one is COMP_NAME and second is PATCHSET NAME.
    Can any one tell me which information is correct First one or second one?
    null

    I don't recall having seen a comps.xml in 8i installations (may be some other configuration can have it). In 8i, it was the .SER files under inventory/contents folder (I guess :-)).

  • UK Public sector : Teachers Pension Patch and Functional Setup

    Hi
    I have a query regarding the functional setup for the above. (I am assuming / expecting answer from those who have done this setup already and they know/gone thorugh the patch readme file )
    I am trying to use the code provided in the patch readme file to findout correct tier for pension contribution..In order to do that I need the Annual FTE Salary inside fast formula.
    The patch readme says ,
    Once the Formula has retrieved the pension contribution Rate, it needs to be
    applied to the actual earnings in the period.
    l_tps_emp_contr_sal = FULL_TIME_ANNUAL_SALARY_TPS_ASG_TRANSFER_PTD
    However I am getting zero value for FULL_TIME_ANNUAL_SALARY_TPS_ASG_TRANSFER_PTD.
    i.e. l_tps_emp_contr_sal is zero which is being passed to
    l_EE_Contribution_Percent = to_number(GET_TABLE_VALUE
    ('PQP_TPA_PENSIONABLE_PAY_RANGE',
                                       'Employee Contribution Rate',
                                       to_char(l_tps_emp_contr_sal)))
    and nothing is coming up.....
    How do I get the correct value of FULL_TIME_ANNUAL_SALARY_TPS_ASG_TRANSFER_PTD ?
    The readme says following
    FTE Salary/Amount
    The Annual salary is the Gross Full Time Equivalent salary based on which the
    band should be decided. There can be multiple elements per assignment that
    could be populating this value and each element may have different
    configurations for example:
    a. Element may have annual value from which a period value is calculated
    b. Period value to be paid
    The above this can be further classified based on
    a. usage of working pattern or working hours
    b. Full time salary
    c. Part time salary.
    a. One time payment on which Annualisation may not be applied but FTE should
    be applied.
    b. One time payment on which Annualisation may be applied but FTE should
    not be applied.
    c. Annual Value on which FTE should be applied.
    d. Annual Value on which FTE should not be applied
    There are many more variants to the scenarios described above.
    To achieve the calculation of the Gross Annual Full Time Equivalent salary
    for all possible scenarios the seeded element FTE Annualised Pay should be
    used by the customer.
    In order for the Pension contribution rate to be determined, the FTE annual
    salary effective at the period in question, must be available.
    It is presumed that the FTE value will be available for the current elements
    that customer uses for paying the teachers as it would be needed to determine
    the actual payment value for the period.
    This value will be fed to the new seeded element (FTE Annualised Pay) by the
    individual element formula.
    Suggested changes for determining Annual Full Time value:
    Suggested changes in elements formula for determining Annual Full Time value:
    The following statements should be added to the existing earnings element
    formula. These are suggested changes to the existing formulae to derive the
    Annual FTE salary.
    Case 1: If the Element Formula has access to Annual FTE Value.
    return_Annual_inf = ANNUAL_VALUE
    /*Assign Annual FTE Value for this element to variable return_Annual_inf*/
    Case 2: If the Element formula has access to only to Period value and
    Annual FTE Value is not stored anywhere.
    return_Annual_inf = (PERIOD_VALUE * PAY_STATUTORY_ANNUAL_PERIODS)
    /* Assign Period Full time Value for this element multiplied by standard
    DBI for annual periods to local variable return_Annual_inf */
    Case 3: If the Element formula has access to only to Annual Part time value
    and Annual FTE Value is not stored anywhere.
    return_Annual_inf = ANNUAL_VALUE / ASG_FTE_VALUE
    /* Assign Period Full time Value for this element multiplied by standard
    DBI for annual periods to local variable return_Annual_inf */
    Case 4: If the Element formula has access to only to Period Part time value
    and Annual FTE Value is not stored anywhere.
    return_Annual_inf=(PERIOD_VALUE*PAY_STATUTORY_ANNUAL_PERIODS)/ASG_FTE_VALUE
    /* Assign Period Full time Value for this element multiplied by standard
    DBI for annual periods then divided by standard DBI for FTE to local
    variable return_Annual_inf */
    Note:
    The new local variable return_annual_inf should be returned from formula to
    the new seeded information element FTE Annualized Pay.

    Hi
    I recently did an evaluation of this patch, and I did get it to work; however, in order to do so I needed to amend some other formulas for e.g. calculation of salary, so that the annualised FTE figure was returned from the formula. This was then referenced in the formula result rules for the annual salary element, to feed that new result to the seeded element provided in the patch ('FTE Annualised Pay'). That then fed the balance.
    It's a major headache as you will have to similarly amend all formulas/result rules pertaining to elements that could form part of the reckonable pay for this calculation.
    Where I am, we won't be using it as we had to come up with our own solution to stand any chance of being 'legal' in time for April.
    Hope this is of use
    Clive

  • After upgrading to Yosemite, Preview does not let me edit jpg photos (cut out something in background and paste a patch to get rid of the flaw.)

    After upgrading to Yosemite, Preview does not let me edit jpg photos (cut out something in background and paste a patch to get rid of the flaw.) Help.

    thankyou. THANK you.
    thankyouthankyouthankyou!
    sorry about no screenie but the first option worked (at least so far!)
    THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU

Maybe you are looking for