Webdb included with Solaris release 2 install?

I have installed Forms Server 6i for Solaris before and the WebDb listener has always been installed as well. However, I just installed release 2 and none of the WebDb prompts showed during the install and WebDb was not installed. Is this no longer included?
If I try to download webdb for Solaris separately then only Portal 3 (at over 1GB in size) is available rather than webdb.

Following up..
I can find the original 6isolaris.tar under reports but not forms. Downloading this first release I find the www21 directory on the install which is missing on release 2. Again, the first release doesn't even show on the technet download for forms, just reports.
I will install forms/reports with the first release and perhaps update with release 2.

Similar Messages

  • Make and dmake included with Solaris 10/Studio 11

    Subject: make and dmake included with Solaris 10/Studio 11
    I've been working on a project where I'm converting makefiles that were originally developed for GNU make to utilize dmake.
    The one issue I've been having is that one dynamic macro "$<" (insert dependency) doesn't seem to work as documented in the make man page either with dmake and make (in /usr/ccs/bin, or /usr/xpg4/bin). Here's a small snippet of what I'm trying to figure out:
    #### Targets
    oraSQL.c: oraSQL.pc
    $(ORACLE_HOME)/bin/proc iname=$< dbms=v8 HOLD_CURSOR=NO RELEASE_CURSOR=YES ireclen=132 oreclen=132 select_error=no lines=yes sqlcheck=semantics xref=yes CODE=CPP ORACA=YES MODE=ORACLE MAXOPENCURSORS=50 userid=$(CONNSTR) When make executes this, it should replace the "$<" with "oraSQL.pc". This does work with GNU make. Now, I know that Solaris make and GNU make are definitely not the same; the manpage for Solaris make at the section titled "Dynamic Macros", clearly states that the same behavior should exist. Unfortunately with Solaris make, the macro is simply replaced with nothing.
    Am I being a blockhead, or is there more too this that someone here might know about?
    Thanks in advance;

    First of all, this is a well known problem. It is not a bug, but a
    difference in behavior between Sun "make" and GNU "make".
    The behavior of Sun "make" is documented in man page,
    and we cannot change the default behavior because this will
    break the existing builds.
    Here is how it is documented in make.1 man page:
    $< The name of a dependency file, derived as if
    selected for use with an implicit rule.
    Second, this problem has been reported several times (see CR
    6593262 for example) , and we addressed it - we provided
    environment variable to specify the compatibility mode.
    SUN_MAKE_COMPAT_MODE=GNU
    - compatibility with GNU "make"
    Compatibility with GNU "make" is partially implemented, and
    will be improved in next releases.
    Here is an example how to set SUN_MAKE_COMPAT_MODE
    to avoid the problem, mentioned in CR 6593262:
    1. This is what happens if SUN_MAKE_COMPAT_MODE is not set.
    % unsetenv SUN_MAKE_COMPAT_MODE
    % cat Makefile
    ## -- Makefile --
    ECHO=/usr/bin/echo
    all: this
    that:
    $(ECHO) "soccer"
    this: that
    $(ECHO) $<
    % dmake -m parallel this
    /usr/bin/echo "soccer"
    soccer
    /usr/bin/echo
    2. Here is what happens if SUN_MAKE_COMPAT_MODE=GNU
    % setenv SUN_MAKE_COMPAT_MODE GNU
    % env | grep SUN_MAKE_COMPAT_MODE
    SUN_MAKE_COMPAT_MODE=GNU
    % dmake -m parallel this
    /usr/bin/echo "soccer"
    soccer
    /usr/bin/echo that
    that
    So, in this case the output is identical to GNU make, correct?
    Please, try to set the environment variable:
    SUN_MAKE_COMPAT_MODE=GNU
    and restart your build.
    Thanks,
    Nik

  • Trouble with Solaris 10 install on SunBlade 100 using Media CDs from Sun

    Hello World,
    My SunBlade 100 was not reading various burned Solaris 10 media, so I purchased the media kit from Sun. The installation is successful up until the point where it asks for CD2. I didn't even hear the drive spin when I clicked "Next" after inserting CD2.
    I know it is not the CD drive since it obviously works for CD1. It is also not an intermittent problem with the CD drive because CD1 works each time I run the install. I also don't think it is the media since CD2 went right from the factory envelope to my CD drive.
    So:
    1. Has anyone encountered something like this?
    2. Can I resume the installation from the command line?
    Many Thanks,
    Greg

    Actually ...
    Yes, it can be the optical drive.
    Those factory shipped drives in the SB100's were prone to spontaneously failing, one minute to the next.
    Additionally the CD's are actually written differently, whether they are the bootable ones in the set versus the non-bootable CDs in the set.
    Data track layouts are different.
    The optical drive could commonly have difficulty reading every disk you ever insert into it.
    Borrow a replacement drive from a PeeCee.
    Jumper it the same as the current drive and just use it.
    If that works, then go buy a replacement.
    Optical read-only drives are laughably cheap.
    Optical read/write DVD drives are inexpensive, as well.

  • Xwin with solaris 10 installed in core mode

    Hello,
    I've installed the Solaris 10 in core mode. The problem is that I need to use the Xmanager software but i don't know which packages must be installed to run the Xmanager . Could someone help me. Thank you in advance
    Huy Nguyen

    What account are logged as? You can type "who" command without the quotation. You should be logged in a root. Root has total control of the system. If you want to go to the root account type "su" command.

  • Help with solaris 10 instalation

    Hi,
    after installing solaris 10, its asking me for login name & password? what should I do?

    Hi
    During the installation, you were asked for the root password. So you need to login as user 'root' using this password.
    The next thing that you should do is to create an ordinary user account for yourself. There's more than one way to do this, but an easy one is to launch /usr/sbin/smc (Solaris Management Console), select 'This Computer' in the Toolboxes list, then System Configuration (left panel) -> Users. After that it's something like Action->Add User (I don't have the necessary priveleges on the machine that I'm using). Then you can logout as root and log back in as the user that you created.
    Paul

  • What version of GTK+ included in Solaris 10?

    I'm with a team that's evaluating upgrading from Solaris 9 4/04 to Solaris 10. One of the issues that we need to examine is GTK compability between Solaris 9 and Solaris 10.
    I can't locate any specific reference to the GTK+ version included with JDS in Solaris 10 (Solaris 9 4/04 is 2.1.0).
    Would someone with Solaris 10 installing mind checking the version of the GTK+ toolkit that's installed?
    Thanks!

    I need the specific version # as determined by doing:
    pk-config --modversion gtk+-2.0
    For example, the version reported in our Solaris 9 install is 2.1.0.

  • Idvd is not included with lion, apple says is discontinued , where i can get it?

    idvd is not included with i life11 installed with new i mac tha comen with  Lion, apple says is discontinued , where i can get it?

    Make a couple of phone calls.
    iDVD is a “Must Have".   (Yes, it should be included.)
    Call Apple, they sometimes sent out iDVD at no charge.
    800-692-7753
    800-275-2273
    If you are still within your 15 day return period,  nicely explain that you may return the computer without iDVD. That usually does the trick.
    Most people report that by asking here:   http://www.apple.com/feedback/idvd.html
    or here:   http://www.apple.com/contact/
    they got a free copy of iDVD.
    If that doesn't work you can purchase iLife 11  (includes iDVD) on disk (don't get the download) for about $39.
    http://www.amazon.com/Apple-MC623Z-A-iLife-VERSION/dp/B003XKRZES/ref=sr_1_1?ie=U

  • Help with Video Card Install on Solaris 8

    I have a video card with nvidia4 chipset. After installing solaris 8 on my system I get a screen that is too big to fit on the monitor, so I have to scroll down to see everything. Plus it displays 16 colors. I tried to install the FreeBSD drivers that are availble on the nvidia site but could not run "make" command. Anyone know how to solve this?

    There are two options:
    1. Install the latest Solaris 8 x86 video driver patch109401-14
    available at:
    http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/show.pl?target=patches/xprod-Solaris_x86IntelDrivers&nav=pub-patches
    This may add native support for your nvidia chipset. If it doesn't,
    then you have the option to try the new VESA driver which is
    included with this patch as well - the VESA driver is supposed to work
    on all cards that have the necessary VESA support bios routines.
    2. Install the "Solaris XFree86 Video Drivers and Porting Kit"
    http://soldc.sun.com/developer/support/driver/tools/video/video-index.html
    It adds support for many video cards by using XFree 4.2.0 video
    driver modules. It also includes another variant of the VESA driver.

  • Several mysterious problems with Solaris 11 x86 install

    Hi folks,
    I've recently installed Solaris 11 x86 as a replacement for Solaris 9 SPARC on an Ultra 2 machine. I like the operating system, but I've promptly acquired some mysterious problems. The computer is a Fujitsu Siemens Esprimo E2500 with a Pentium 4 HT 3.06 GHz processor, 2 GB RAM, an 80 GB SATA disk and a 147 GB SCSI disk.
    I have had a few occasions on which the screen goes totally blank, the monitor claims that there is no signal, and I have to restart the machine. However, with the blank screen, the hard drive activity light is sometimes still flashing. This happens predictably when I try to log off (as opposed to shutting down) and when I use Totem media player and click on anything inside the Totem window. The motherboard has built-in graphics and brief specifications can be found here:
    http://uk.ts.fujitsu.com/rl/servicesupport/techsupport/professionalpc/ESPRIMO/Datasheets/ds_esprimo_edition_e2500.pdf
    Yesterday my PS/2 keyboard started causing the motherboard to beep crazily when I use it. It beeps rapidly 4 times, then prints the expected character. However, the problem doesn't occur at the initial log in screen. The mouse cursor has also gone beserk on one occasion, flying all over the screen (I had this problem with a previous PC, but a different OS, and thought it was a hardware fault, which I why I got this new computer). With the keyboard problem, the machine is basically unusable. However, it is configured as a dual boot machine, and the keyboard problem isn't present with Windows XP.
    There are also a few smaller, odd problems. Occasionally all the icons vanish from my Gnome desktop. The command prompt also mysteriously changed from $chris@pluto to $bash-4.1 just before the keyboard problem appeared, although that might have had something to do with me copying my home directory to a different disk and editing the /etc/auto_home file (moving the home directory worked fine). Also, unlike with Solaris 9 SPARC, I find that I have to have external SCSI devices switched on at boot time, should I want to use them later. That's a pain. With Solaris 9, I could run "boot -r" when I first attached the device, then switch on the SCSI devices and mount them whenever I wanted.
    After the useful advice I received here about "more" and "less", I thought I'd post these problems and see if anyone can help. I'd really appreciate some advice. Can anyone identify likely causes for these problems? Which problems can I expect to solve and which do I have to live with?
    Many thanks,
    Chris Tidy
    Edited by: Chris Tidy on 23-Mar-2012 03:36

    Hi folks,
    I've recently installed Solaris 11 x86 as a replacement for Solaris 9 SPARC on an Ultra 2 machine. I like the operating system, but I've promptly acquired some mysterious problems. The computer is a Fujitsu Siemens Esprimo E2500 with a Pentium 4 HT 3.06 GHz processor, 2 GB RAM, an 80 GB SATA disk and a 147 GB SCSI disk.
    I have had a few occasions on which the screen goes totally blank, the monitor claims that there is no signal, and I have to restart the machine. However, with the blank screen, the hard drive activity light is sometimes still flashing. This happens predictably when I try to log off (as opposed to shutting down) and when I use Totem media player and click on anything inside the Totem window. The motherboard has built-in graphics and brief specifications can be found here:
    http://uk.ts.fujitsu.com/rl/servicesupport/techsupport/professionalpc/ESPRIMO/Datasheets/ds_esprimo_edition_e2500.pdf
    Yesterday my PS/2 keyboard started causing the motherboard to beep crazily when I use it. It beeps rapidly 4 times, then prints the expected character. However, the problem doesn't occur at the initial log in screen. The mouse cursor has also gone beserk on one occasion, flying all over the screen (I had this problem with a previous PC, but a different OS, and thought it was a hardware fault, which I why I got this new computer). With the keyboard problem, the machine is basically unusable. However, it is configured as a dual boot machine, and the keyboard problem isn't present with Windows XP.
    There are also a few smaller, odd problems. Occasionally all the icons vanish from my Gnome desktop. The command prompt also mysteriously changed from $chris@pluto to $bash-4.1 just before the keyboard problem appeared, although that might have had something to do with me copying my home directory to a different disk and editing the /etc/auto_home file (moving the home directory worked fine). Also, unlike with Solaris 9 SPARC, I find that I have to have external SCSI devices switched on at boot time, should I want to use them later. That's a pain. With Solaris 9, I could run "boot -r" when I first attached the device, then switch on the SCSI devices and mount them whenever I wanted.
    After the useful advice I received here about "more" and "less", I thought I'd post these problems and see if anyone can help. I'd really appreciate some advice. Can anyone identify likely causes for these problems? Which problems can I expect to solve and which do I have to live with?
    Many thanks,
    Chris Tidy
    Edited by: Chris Tidy on 23-Mar-2012 03:36

  • IPhoto install NOT included with Leopard

    Here's the scenario: Purchased an iMac 24" (2.8GHhz) a couple of weeks ago. Got it home and fired it up only to be confronted with Tiger as an OS. There were three Leopard Install Discs provided with the machine so (after much head scratching as to which method of install to choose) I did a clean install. All fine, except it was 10.5.0 and needed lots and lots of Software Updates to get up to speed.
    At the same time (in the Mac Store Milton Keynes, UK) I purchased a separate copy of Leopard to bring my G4 17" Laptop in line with the shiny new iMac. I was running Tiger 10.4.9 on the lappy. I ran Carbon Copy Clone (just in case) on the laptop before doing a clean install of Leopard 10.5.1 from the purchased disc.
    All pretty straightforward so far.
    My main reason for upgrading the laptop was to ensure both machines could run iPhoto 08 (or whatever the latest number is).
    When I plugged in (to the iMac) my external Lacie Rugged drive, which holds my Tiger iPhoto Library, Leopard told me that if I opened this in iPhoto 08 I would no longer be able to access it through any earlier versions - thanks Apple!
    So, you can imagine my surprise when, after a successful install on the laptop, I came to launch iPhoto only to find it isn't there. A quick look at the (most excellent) Mac Forums provided me with the answer - iLife 08 and it's various components are NOT included with Leopard - thanks again Apple.
    A ha, I thought. I'll simply use the 'Everything Else' discs that came with the iMac and install iLife from there.
    Pop in the disc, choose 'Install other components' packet... Nope - Message come up - Cannot install this software on this computer. Oops.
    Latest thought is (and this eventually leads to the question, bear with me)...
    On the Laptop - Go back to the original Tiger install discs and see if there's an option to install iLife 06 components only. Then go back to the Leopard Discs and see if they will then allow for an upgrade rather than an install from scratch.
    Question really is, I guess, does anyone else have a suggestion? Other than go out and buy a copy of iLife 08! Just trying not to overspend on Apple products that surely should be included in the Leopard install. I don't recall EVER having to pay for additional Apple software through any of the upgrade paths in the past.

    Hi there
    I used Pacifist OSX package extractor. Take the Leo install disc that came with your new Mac, install Pacifist on the computer you want iphoto installed and extract iphoto. I quote from the manufacturers (charlessoft.com) website:
    "Pacifist is an essential utility that allows you to extract certain files from Apple's bundled installer packages. For exmaple, if you need to reinstall iDVD, the only Apple-sanctioned choice is to restore your entire system. Using Pacifist, you can extract just the iDVD application.
    Even if you think you'll never use it, you should download Pacifist - I guarantee that someday, someway, you'll want to get at just one file out of an installation bundle. As soon as you do, register Pacifist, as it will have just easily paid for itself in time saved!"
    I did it that way and it worked flawlessly. Hope this helps.
    Cheers benjaminmaurice

  • Formatting a HDD with the Solaris 8 install when the disk space is locked.

    I added memory, a printer, and a CD Writer to my PC, and then I reinstalled solaris 8. At the point where it asks which drive to use, the only available drive, which is my C: drive, shows up with a negative disk space value. However, when I look at the partition size, it is 20 GB, and if I change it, it has no effect on the negative value. This is a reinstall of Solaris 8 onto the same drive. Is there a way to fdisk the drive. Solaris 8 won't do it, and Partition Magic seems to only work with linux, which does not seem compatible with Solaris?

    I added memory, a printer, and a CD Writer to my PC, and then I reinstalled solaris 8. At the point where it asks which drive to use, the only available drive, which is my C: drive, shows up with a negative disk space value. However, when I look at the partition size, it is 20 GB, and if I change it, it has no effect on the negative value. This is a reinstall of Solaris 8 onto the same drive. Is there a way to fdisk the drive. Solaris 8 won't do it, and Partition Magic seems to only work with linux, which does not seem compatible with Solaris?

  • Muvee software (included with 2TB Canvio Connect) will not download & install

    When I run the setup.exe in the root of my Toshiba 2TB Canvio Connect USB disk drive, I switch to the "muvee Reveal" tab, then click on the "Download" button.
    It prompts me with a panel that says "You are now leaving Canvio Installer and will be redirected to a special muvee website.", I then click on the "Continue" button and nothing happens.
    Any ideas? If anyone has successfully installed it can you please email the URL to me.
    I assume the "special muvee website" is a page with a version of muvee Reveal that accepts a Canvio serial number as an unlock code or something similar.
    Thanks for your help
    Dale

    My device came with folders containing install software for NTI Backup EZ, PogoPlug PC, and a Mac NTFS driver.
    It also had in the root directory a "Quick Reference Guide.pdf" and "Setup.exe" to install the software. Setup.exe has four tabs, the last being the "muvee Reveal" tab.
    The "muvee Reveal" tab has the "Download" button which prompts me with a panel that says "You are now leaving Canvio Installer and will be redirected to a special muvee website.". But when I then click on the "Continue" button nothing happens.

  • DS license with Solaris: 5.1 vs. 5.2?

    My understanding was that Solaris 9 comes with a license to use Sun ONE DS 5.1 with up to 200,000 entities (having userPassword) primarily for Naming Services, but that this license didn't extend to DS 5.2.
    I'm seeing a lot of traffic about using 5.2 and less about 5.1, plus references to getting 5.2 off of the Solaris CD's. I haven't got Solaris 9 04/04 yet. But my understanding (URL's below) was that 12/03 and 04/04 still came with 5.1 for Solaris and a separate copy of 5.2 as a part of the Java Enterprise System, which has a separate licensing system.
    http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/817-3801/6mjcck32h?a=view
    http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/817-3801/6mjcck32v?a=view#whatsnew-s9fcs-45
    Has this changed? Does the DS license included in Solaris now allow use of DS 5.2? Or are a lot of people buying the full JES or a separate copy of DS 5.2 when they get 5.1 for free?

    Directory Server is now delivered as a component of Java Enterprise System, that's true.
    You can also download 5.2 from http://wwws.sun.com/software/download/products/3ee79e69.html it seems.
    Concerning the licensing, if you've had a maintenance contract starting from the first entry, then you can upgrade to 5.2, for which Sun is continuing to release patches until that version is retired. As far as I know anyway.
    Hope that helps,
    Mark

  • Experience with Solaris 10 Memory Management

    Dear Forum!
    Using Note 724713 we installed a couple of R3 Systems on Solaris 10. Independently which R3 Version is used we observe much more memory problems as with prior solaris releases or other operating systems like AIX.
    For instance1: We moved three R3 Systems from a server with solaris 8 to a server with solaris 10. We didnt change memory parameters of R3 and the databases (oracle). The solaris 10 server has the same amount of memory (8GB) like the solaris 8 server. Now, on the solaris 10 server we can only start two R3 systems, the third one doesnt start because no memory can be allocated. The memory parameter of all component slightly overload the main memory. Because the systems are not productive they mostly idle and performance loss due to paging and even swapping didnt worry us. Not even that the third system didnt start, the whole OS was a kind of freezed and no more work was possible, also not on the other two R3 systems which were already startet.
    For instance2:
    On another server with 16GB memory we startet an installation of a sapsystem and the sapinst crashed due to memory absence. Admittedly, here the main memory was also a bit overloaded, but this is not unusal here and I never saw sapinst crashing because of this.
    In both cases Swapspace was adequate.
    Do you have similar  experiences? Or any tipps to solve the problem.
    Thanks
    Andreas

    this is strange. Although /etc/user_attr shows
    /etc/user_attr shows
    adm::::profiles=Log Management
    lp::::profiles=Printer Management
    postgres::::type=role;profiles=Postgres Administration,All
    root::::auths=solaris.*,solaris.grant;profiles=Web Console Management,All;lock_after_retries=no;min_label=admin_low;cle
    arance=admin_high
    qp7adm::::project=QP7
    oraqp7::::project=QP7
    sapadm::::project=QP7
    smdadm::::project=QP7
    the process list show that the processes of the user sidadm run in project "system" only the oracle user project is ok:
    root@pi7q #  ps -eo user,pid,ppid,project,args
        USER   PID  PPID  PROJECT COMMAND
      oraqp7  1783  3652      QP7 ora_q001_QP7
      oraqp7   125  3652      QP7 ora_mmon_QP7
      qp7adm  1884  1862   system dw.sapQP7_DVEBMGS00 pf=/usr/sap/QP7/SYS/profile/QP7_DVEBMGS00_pi7q
      oraqp7 20464  3652      QP7 oracleQP7 (LOCAL=NO)
      daemon  4416  3652   system /usr/lib/nfs/nfs4cbd
      qp7adm  1870  1862   system icman -attach pf=/usr/sap/QP7/SYS/profile/QP7_DVEBMGS00_pi7q
      oraqp7 20462  3652      QP7 oracleQP7 (LOCAL=NO)
        root 14658 25510 user.root bash
      oraqp7   105  3652      QP7 ora_dbw1_QP7
      oraqp7  2980  3652      QP7 oracleQP7 (LOCAL=NO)
        root  5819  3652   system ./tGAgent.d -d
      oraqp7  2544  3652      QP7 oracleQP7 (LOCAL=NO)
      smdadm  5639  3652   system /usr/sap/SMD/SMDA02/exe/sapstartsrv pf=/usr/sap/SMD/SYS/profile/SMD_SMDA02_pi7q
      qp7adm  1900  1862   system dw.sapQP7_DVEBMGS00 pf=/usr/sap/QP7/SYS/profile/QP7_DVEBMGS00_pi7q
        root  4443  3668   system /usr/lib/saf/sac -t 300

  • Printer Driver for Epson Stylus R800 Printer Included with OS X 5 Leopard

    How many faulty drivers may there be included with OS X 5 Leopard?
    After installing OS X 5 Leopard I found that when using my Epson Stylus PHOTO R800 printer photograph prints and ordinary lettering were extremely feint and unusable.
    From the list of printers installed with OS X 5, as given in Apple "K"base Documents, I checked the version number of the driver for the Stylus Photo R800 and it was given as "SPR800 3.09 app"
    I next checked the latest driver specified by Epson on their website---it too was given as
    "SPR800 3.09 app".
    Despite this information I downloaded the "SPR800 3.09 app" from Epson and installed it and the problem was solved.
    I am writing this to inform others that despite the driver included with OS X 5 being specified as
    "SPR800 3.09 3.09" it certainly is not!!!
    The only answer is to use the latest version provided on the Epson website.

    Dear scb
    Many thanks for taking the time to reply to my post, you are so right in your remarks.
    Although I've been on Macs for around 25 years I hadn't come across something as blatant as this before---maybe I've been lucky!
    Your comment regarding the avoidance of software included with the product is very relevant particularly at the present time, so soon after the release of OS X 5 Leopard. There must be thousands of printers and the like which are being sold right now with software applicable to OS X 4 Tiger included with them.
    DLS

Maybe you are looking for