Webex Node Multi-Tenant Configuration

Hi,
We are currently deploying webex node on ASR for a client, in the UC 8.x it mentions the ability to multi-tenant the node capabilityes e.g
Page 22-9
"There is also the potential to deploy the WebEx Node for ASR in a multi-tenant capacity, in which two
businesses working closely together with staff working on each other's premises could have the other's
WebEx site defined on their ASR Nodes. This means that, when staff for Enterprise B access their
company's WebEx site through Enterprise A, they can use the local ASR Node to accelerate their
meeting while saving bandwidth for Enterprise A. This feature can also benefit organizations that have
multiple WebEx sites."
This is the only reference in any guide I can find to being able to do this.
Has anyone actually done this? Is it actually possible? and if so does anyone have any documentation that they can point out that may be of use trying to deploy this type of solution.
I know it's a long shot but any help is much appreciated.

Hi A.Zarei,
Based on your description, I recommend to check if the Managed Metadata service application is associated with the web application where your My Site hose site exists.
Please double check if the service account of the My Site host site web application and the user profile service application has read permission on the Managed Metadata service application.
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Unable to send to external email recipients - Multi Tenant Exchange 2013 - MultiRole servers in DAG

Greetings all, I hope someone can help.
I have created a Exchange 2013 multi-tenant organization, with two servers, both multi-role - CAS and Mailbox roles.
Internal mail flow is fine (external email addresses can send to the domain).
External firewall port forwards ports 443 and 25 to the Internal DAG IP address.
There are two multi-role Exchange servers that are members of the DAG.
I am able to connect to OWA and ECP via https://externalIP/OWA and https://alias.domain.com/OWA
No SSL certificates have been purchased or installed yet.
Exchange URLs have not been changed since default configuration at install.
OWA and ECP works both internal and external.
External DNS works with SPF and PTR records correctly configured
Exchange RCA - Send test only fails with one Spam Listing (this Blacklist provider now flags all domains and you cannot ask to be removed)
Send Connectors are the default ones created during install. Receive connector is standard configuration with - * -
When sending email to an external address, I receive a failure notice
ServerName.test.corp.int gave this error:
Unable to relay
Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept email from certain senders, or another restriction may be preventing delivery.
More Info -
ServerName.test.corp.int
Remote Server returned '550 5.7.1 Unable to relay'
I have been troubleshooting this for many hours with no progress.
I have created new Send Connectors for the server that is advising that it is unable to relay, but they have all failed.
I have tried setting the Internal IP address for Exhange Server 1 (Exchange Server 2 reports failure), with most combinations of Security (Anonymous, Exchange Users, etc).
I have also tried with the IP range 192.168.11.0/24 to allow the whole the subnet, I still receive the unable to relay failure notice.
I have tried this guide - hxxps://glazenbakje.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/exchange-2013-how-to-configure-an-internal-relay-connector/ - with different combinations, still no resolution.
I am at a loss as to why I can't send out with the default configuration. I would assume that email would flow out without any changes, but this does not happen.
Can someone please assist before I lose my sanity.
Thanks in advance,
Terry

Greetings all, I hope someone can help.
I have created a Exchange 2013 multi-tenant organization, with two servers, both multi-role - CAS and Mailbox roles.
Internal mail flow is fine.
Incoming mail from external senders is also fine. -
external email addresses can send to the domain).
External firewall port forwards ports 443 and 25 to the Internal DAG IP address.
There are two multi-role Exchange servers that are members of the DAG.
I am able to connect to OWA and ECP via https://externalIP/OWA and https://alias.domain.com/OWA
No SSL certificates have been purchased or installed yet.
Exchange URLs have not been changed since default configuration at install.
OWA and ECP works both internal and external.
External DNS works with SPF and PTR records correctly configured
Exchange RCA - Send test only fails with one Spam Listing (this Blacklist provider now flags all domains and you cannot ask to be removed)
Receive Connectors are the default ones created during install. Send connector is standard configuration with - * -
When sending email to an external address, I receive a failure notice
ServerName.test.corp.int gave this error:
Unable to relay
Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept email from certain senders, or another restriction may be preventing delivery.
More Info -
ServerName.test.corp.int
Remote Server returned '550 5.7.1 Unable to relay'
I have been troubleshooting this for several days with no progress.
I have created new Receive Connectors for the server that is advising that it is unable to relay, but they have all failed.
I have tried setting the Internal IP address for Exhange Server 1 (Exchange Server 2 reports failure), with most combinations of Security (Anonymous, Exchange Users, etc).
I have also tried with the IP range 192.168.11.0/24 to allow the whole the subnet, I still receive the unable to relay failure notice.
I have tried this guide - hxxps://glazenbakje.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/exchange-2013-how-to-configure-an-internal-relay-connector/ - with different combinations, still no resolution.
Even more info - Further troubleshooting -
I found my one of my Exchange servers had an extra NIC. I have since added a second NIC to the other server, so now both Exchange servers have dual NICs. I removed the DAG cleanly and recreated the DAG from scratch, using this link -
hxxp://careexchange.in/how-to-create-a-database-availability-group-in-exchange-2013/
The issue still exists, even with a newly created DAG. I also found that the Tenant Address Books were not 'applied'. I applied them but still no resolution
I think the issue is related to multi-tenant configuration even though the error says that it can't relay. The unable to relay message can appear when sending from a domain that the Organization does not support. Like trying to email as [email protected]
when you domain name is apple.com - But through extensive research I still can't resolve the issue.
Can someone please assist before I lose my sanity.
Thanks in advance,
Terry

Webex node configuration..

Hi all!
I am thinking in implementing a webex node, but I can´t find any documentation about how implementing, what do I need? and cost. And if is supported in Mexico. Help, please!
Best regards!

WebEx node went EOL for quite some time now
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/conferencing/webex-node-mcs/end_of_life_notice_c51-704258.html
If you're asking about CWMS, there's plenty of information on cisco.com about.
All the requirements are outlined in the documentation, if you want to know about costs and availability, get in touch with a local Cisco representative.

Can anyone explain what "multi-tenant" means with respect to OAM and OIF?

Hi,
I noticed that OAM 11gR2 has several additional authentication modules and schemes out-of-the-box for "MT" or multi-tenant. I've actually tried them, but am not clear exactly what their purpose is?
As a test, I configured the FederationMT module and FederationMTScheme to protect a test resource in OAM, and then when I access the resource, I first get a page with one field for username and a "Sign In" button. After I enter a user name, it goes to a form login page and I can log into the OIF IdP, and that's about it. I guess that I don't see what this accomplishes?
If anyone is familiar with this, please advise.
Thanks,
Jim

Hi,
Thanks for the metalink article. I've read that, and I can understand what the article is describing, but I'm not 100% clear how that relates to the configuration parameters in the FederationMTPlugin. The article talks about a mapping file, but I don't see something like that for configuring the TenantDismbiguationPlugin?
The first step in FederationMTScheme plugin is a TenantDisambiguationPlugin, which takes two parameters:
KEY_IDENTITY_STORE_REF
KEY_FEDERATED_TENANTS (a comma-separated list of "some things")
The steps/orchestration for the FederationMTPlugin has:
Initial Step: FedUserAuthenticationPlugin
TenantDisambiguationPlugin OnSuccess: FedAuthenticationPlugin OnFailure: UserIdentificationPlugin
UserIdentificationPlugin OnSuccess: UserAuthenticationPlugin OnFailure: failure
UserAuthenticationPlugin OnSuccess: success OnFailure: failure
FedAuthnRequestPlugin OnSuccess: success OnFailure: FedUserAuthentication
FedUserAuthenticationPlugin OnSuccess: success OnFailure: TenantAmbiguationPlugin
[The OnError results for all steps are failure, so I haven't shown them.]
So, the first step is the FedUserAuthenticationPlugin (AssertionProcessing), and if that fails, the next step is the TenantDisambiguationPlugin.
I guess all of my questions are around what that TenantAmbiguationPlugin does, and how it works?
I'm guessing that what you enter on the 1st webpage, which asks for a Tenant, is matched against the comma-separated list that is in the plugins "KEY_FEDERATED_TENANTS" parameter.
Is that correct?
But:
a) What happens if there is a match of what you entered vs. what's in the "KEY_FEDERATED_TENANTS" list?
b) What happens if there is NOT a match of what you entered vs. what's in the "KEY_FEDERATED_TENANTS" list?
That article you mentioned calls for a mapping file, that maps what is entered (the tenant) to a user identity store, but where is that in the TenantDisambiguationPlugin's parameters? The only other parameter for that plugin is the "KEY_IDENTITY_STORE_REF" parameter.
Having said that, I described the steps and step orchestration in the FederationMTPlugin above. If the TenantDisambiguationPlugin is suppose to somehow map what's entered to a user identity store name, then, with respect to the FederationMTPlugin, is that mapped user identity store used for the UI and UA steps (i.e., as the "KEY_IDENTITY_STORE_REF" for the UI and UA steps)?
Thanks for your help with this. Oracle's documentation certainly merits some improvement :(...
Jim

AD RMS for multi tenant domain environment

Hi,
I have successfully configure the AD RMS with lots of work around. now i want to use multi tenant domain environment. i have multiple domains running on my production env. Now can anyone help me out to configure the RMS Server to add multiple URLs for licensing
and certifications in AD RMS Server on windows Server 2012. i need a proper step by step configuration roles to activate on immediate basis.
Any help in this regards will be highly appreciated,
Attahcments screent shots might help you what i want ;)
Regards,
Imran Bashir
MCSA 2008, MCITP, MCTS, MCP
JNCIA ER,EX
Brocade Certified
Imran Bashir Network Administrator MCP, JNCIA-EX,ER,JNIOUS +92-333-4330176

Hi,
in a single forest you can have only one RMS SCP. You could create more RMS clusters but those are not discover-able that way, only over using RMS templates or overwriting the clients registry.
If you say multi-tenant I assume every tenant should have its own RMS key, correct? If you have only one RMS cluster the cluster admin will have control over all documents.
Hope that helps,
Lutz

Meeting place Webex Node 8.0 Web interface

Hi all,
I just installed Meeting place Webex node , an i want what exactly the URL link to access to this server.
Thanks in advance
Hicham

What I know you can just connect to the servers ip address/DNS name and you will just see a status page like the one attached
There in not much more you can do on the node via web, all configuration is done via the CLI

Can SCSM2012 be used as multi-tenant solution?

Hello,
I was wondering if the SCSM2012 can be used for multi-tenant purposes + monitoring of separated tenants.
Situation:
Deploying SCSM2012 to several customer sites(non-trusted domain) then providing the service from one location(1 console) to multiple (separated) customer sites. Customer will have own separated self service portal with pre configured (automated)workflows.
For the monitoring case, the information needs to be collected from the customers site(deployed agents) and displayed at our centralized site(maybe 1 big screen for all tenants )
Any ideas ?

Hello Ayman,
thank you for the quick reply. I was already afraid for this answer :(. But there could be scenarios where it is implemented already.
The requirements that are needed are complex. The deployement scenario will need to cover whole customers (complex) infrastructures. We want to deploy the SCSM2012 to manage (remote)the infrastructures.. Hereby is the monitoring also important part
of our solution. The most common incidents,changes,problems will be automated(this is not the problem), but the collection of the data from the customer site and access it on our site is the issue. So this would be implemented as on- promise solution and we
would manage (as needed) remotely.
Not sure if the solution can be like this:
Implement SCSM2012 at customer site, cache the data from CMDB into some tool that can be replicated to our site, whereby we could get the data out of this tool to use it for monitoring purpose. Then, when needed(as alert is popped up for random customer)
we could log in remotely to solve this(if its not solved automatically). This is just idea please put some "better" idea(s). Thank you

Implementing Multi-Tenant Portal

Hi,
Thanks in advanced
Anyone have any Configuration Documents Related to "Multi-Tenant Portal".
Please send me on my mail id [email protected]
thanks & regards
Chittya

Hi
Refer to these links.
These links give u some idea to start with.....
All for One and One for All - New Functions for the SAP NetWeaver Portal in 2004s Part II
All for One and One for All - New Functions for the SAP NetWeaver Portal in 2004s
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/daa51a96-0b01-0010-738f-a0ecfd06104e
Regards
Bhargava
points are welcome if useful

Registering with the WebEx Data Center and the Cisco WebEx Node Management System

Dear guys, ...
Please help,
i want to implement to webex node ASR1000, i have read in "Configuring the Cisco Webex Node for ASR 100.pdf", there is prerequisites to implement it, that is "Registering with the WebEx Data Center and the Cisco WebEx Node Management System"
Can someone tell how to "Registering with the WebEx Data Center and the Cisco WebEx Node Management System"
Are there any step by step documentation to "Registering with the WebEx Data Center and the Cisco WebEx Node Management System"?
Thank you
BR

You should have received a PAK Key with your order. Go to Cisco licensing and enter the PAK Key as this will start the process. Once the PAK Key is validated a screen will be displayed to enter your request for ASR 100 integration. It normally takes a few days to a couple of weeks to get the information back from WebEx needed to configure your ASR.
If you did not get a PAK Key contact your WebEx rep to get the process started to integrate your ASR to your WebEx site.
Hope this helps
John

SMTP Authentication in Exchange 2013 multi tenant

I have configure a multi tenant environment. local domain is scurenet.local and i have host 3 different email domains like
abcd.com efg.com and xyz.com. now how its possible to create 3 mailboxes of same login in 3 different domains like [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] also
want to authenticate with there emailIDs and that is main issue. i can create 3 different logins like john1 john2 and john3 in AD and manually add smtp like [email protected] etc.
but issue is how i authenticate users with SMTP IDs so john1 can login using [email protected] and
password john2 use [email protected] as
login id and so on.

Hi,
I think you can try creating mailboxes for the three users and assign the full access permissions to each other.
Thanks,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support

Cisco MeetingPlace 8 EMS with WebEx node for MCS

Hi All,
I am in the process of setting up Meeting Place for the 1st time for my office UC Collaboration suite
Products installed:
Cisco Meeting Place 8.x NFR (8.0.1.3)
Cisco Meeting Place 8.x WebEx Node NFR (8.0.1.8)
I been doing days of reading on the docwiki. Audio conferencing with the MP alone is working fine on my setup
I am trying to configure for Web Deployment: Cisco WebEx Scheduling, Internal Meetings.
Would like to keep everything on-premise
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Unified_MeetingPlace_Release_8.0_--_Choosing_a_Web_Deployment_for_Cisco_Unified_MeetingPlace_Release_8.0#Components_Used_for_Cisco_WebEx_Scheduling.2C_Internal_Meetings
Doubts/Enquiry
It states that component used:
Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Application Server.
Express Media Server.
Cisco WebEx Node on MCS.
Cisco WebEx site.
Required in order for the user to join a meeting.
One Cisco WebEx site handles both internal and external meetings
I believe that i am missing the Cisco WebEx site step. I have key-ed in PAK license for the WebEx Node on go/license website. But i do not receive anything in return for almost a day now.
Am i on the right track; expecting Cisco/WebEx to send me some Site Registration form or etc?
Based on the fact that i am on a NFR kit
Please advise
Regards: Jocelyn

-When Provisioning a WebEx node, it must be able to register to a WebEx site in order to function and for provisioning to complete. Without a WebEx site to communicate to, the node is unable to host internal WebEx meetings. As such, a WebEx site subscription must also be included in any setup of a MeetingPlace/WebEx integration.
-Based on this requirement, MP 8.0 is not able to provide a complete on-premise web conferencing solution. Integration with the WebEx Cloud is needed.
-Unfortunately TAC does not have visibility to the WebEx site or node provisioning process until it is completed. In this situation we must reach out to the Account Team or Point of Sale for the WebEx site in order to determine the status of the initial provisioning process.

Meeting place 8.0 and WebEx Node Integration issue.

Hello All,
We have installed MP 8.x and Webex node on seperate servers. After this we have installed a webserver.exe and sql server on a different server and configured the GatewaySIM and sql. connectivity is fine.
1. Please let us know how to login to MP user portal. (What is the URL)
2. How to integrate Webex with MP?
3. Is there a good document to bring up the webex web interface.
Regards,
Shaijal

Take a look at http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Unified_MeetingPlace_Release_8.0_--_Integrating_Cisco_Unified_MeetingPlace_with_Cisco_WebEx
That has all the information I used to eventually get the MP WebEx integration to work for us.
If you have problems you may struggle to get a good answer from Cisco on this, unfortunately there is very little knowledge of WebEx within Cisco TAC, something they badly need to address.

ISE 1.2 AUP Multi-Portal Configuration

Currently we have ISE 1.2 configured using a multi-portal configuration. We use a guest portal for both Guest Access and for devices we consider non-compliant employee. Guest users are authenticated against an inernal user database in ISE, and the company owned devices auth against AD. If we login with a guest account that was created using the sponsor portal, we do not get the acceptable usage policy to check before getting access. If we login using the AD account, we do get the Acceptable Usage Policy to check before getting access. It appears this is the same portal, so why do we not get it for both?

for guest AUP configuration
AUP for posture assesment config

How to create a multi-level configuration sales order?

Hi,
    My client use configurable material to sell computers. And the production mode is MTO. One sales order item correspond with a production order
    Now my client also sell array which consist of two computers, two storage, one UPS power etc. That means I must realize multi-level configuration. First, choose the computer type. Second, based on the choosed computer in first step, choose the cpu, disk and so on. And then based on the sales order item, there must be several production order related to the same sales order item.
    Now I have semi-finished product B1,B2--computer. Class type is 300. Many characteristics is allocated to the class. B type material has the BOM which consist of cpu,disk etc.
    Then I created the finished product A--array. Class type is 300. Allocated characteristics is the B1,B2. A has the BOM which consist of B1,B2 etc.
    When I create sales order, I can only config the first level,choose computers for A, can not choose cpu,disk for computers.
    So, how can I find a solution for this scenario?
    Thanks in advance.

Thanks, Waza
1. Does the Sales order BOM explode in the sales order?
No. Just one top item would be ok for my client.
2. Why do thy want this in the sales order? They can explode the BOM in the production order, do they then need pricing at the component level?
They do not need pricing at the component level. Exploding the BOM in the production order is acceptable. But how can I config the configurable material in components of production order?
I tried collective order, but the second level of configurable material can not generate production order. I just make use of special procurement 52 in MRP2 of top finished product. Is there something I missed?
Thanks again.

How to make multi-tenant business rules

hi'
I want to write tenant specific Business rules in multi-tenant application, please give me some tips of making multi-tenat business rule.
I know how to write common business rule for all the tenants.
thanks
Yatan

I'd suggest using Flash Media Interactive Server if you wish to make this type of application and use Flash as the interface. I can't give you the details on exactly how to implement it, but using Remote Shared Object and FMIS would serve as the basis. I believe that the package comes with examples of Shared Objects that can serve as a simple basis from which to proceed. After that you might want to see if you can find an available whiteboard app that can be leveraged to do as you wish.
I apologize in advance if using this type of solution is a non-starter, I've been using FMIS locally and have plans to eventually implement something similar to this type of drawing app as well.

Webex Node Multi-Tenant Configuration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for