WebHelp Search returning no results when publishing to SharePoint

I have an issue I need help with. When I publish my project to Sharepoint, I've tried AIRHelp and WebHelp, and I try to do a search within the help, it ALWAYS says no results are found. Has anyone seen this happen before? Thanks!

Hi there
Sorry, no magick bullet or incantation to offer here other than to say you should probably report it as a bug to Adobe.
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 within the day - $24.95!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcerStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

Similar Messages

Directory search returns wrong results when you modify the view

Hello,
I have a custom list used a staff directory. This is SharePoint 2013. I am using a search box where users can type in names to find people.
When I add or remove a record in the list or modify the view and then I search for my name, all search results appear. It once just returned 1 record for my name, but now it returns all 100 records in the list.
How can I fix this?
Thanks,
Paul
Paul

Hi Paul,
Did you search in the SharePoint list or in SharePoint search center?
Could you provide more details about how you created the custom list?
Please try to enable Server Render as editing the page->Edit Web Part-> Miscellaneous, compare the result.
Please operate in other lists and in other site collections and test whether this issue occurs.
Please start a full crawl in Central Administration -> Manage service application -> Search service application -> Content Sources and test whether this issue occurs.
Could you check if it exists error in ULS log after you failed to search in the SharePoint list.
Best Regards,
Dean Wang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Product search return no result when searching the root folder.

Searching any sub-folder works as expected.

thanks all, I can't find the Manufacturer for the Part Number yet. but I will ask somebody to help me get them.
I will report my new progress~
As per the documentation (see below), you have to enter the manufacturer number also. You cannot leave it blank and also you should activate the corresponding MARA index by manufacturer part number.
Manufacturer and manufacturer part number
Description
This parameter is used to determine a material from the number of a manufacturer and manufacturer part number.
To use this parameter for selection, activate the corresponding index in the table MARA.
Value range
The field MANU_MAT must contain the manufacturer part number.
The field MFR_NO must contain the number of a manufacturer.
A value must always be entered in both fields. It is not possible to search generically.
Message was edited by:
Chao Zhong

SharePoint Foundation 2010 Search returns no results

Hi,
SharePoint foundation 2010 Search is not showing any results after configuring the step from the below link.
http://wiki.sirkit.ca/2011/04/sharepoint-foundation-2010-search-returns-no-results/
My Server Setup :
SharePoint Foundation 2010
SQL Server 2008 r2
We have created two web application and configured the search service as above mention link.
And we have migrated a site from MOSS 2007 to SharePoint 2010 to one of web application,we assigned search database to the newly migrated content database.
Previously there was Form based Authentication was done on Moss 2007 site and on SP 2010 we are working on Windows authentication.
Database showing crawl is working and showing success results as well in SQL table, Its only Not able to show the results on the page.
Thanks in Advance
Dinesh
Regards, Dinesh Reddy.

Don't look at the databases, it's a bad habit to get into and will lead to confusion.
In search administration are you getting any sucsess messages in the crawl history and is the number of items in your index non-zero?
If so that implies that the crawl process is working and it's the user security that's the issue.
To confirm try searching for a file whilst logged in as the crawl account, that should return results.

cm:search is not returning any result when logical operator '!' is used.

<cm:search is not returning any result when logical operator '!' is used.
I am using BEA 9.1 content management services API. When I run the following query I am not receiving any results. Also no error or exceptions are seen in the weblogic or cmspi log.
The query is <cm:search id="docs" query="!(object_name like 'Sport*')" />

HI cam
Thanks for your reply, but i found the problem it was because my server administrator password has changed by network guys... and because of it crawler unable to access the content
I wrote my solution here i hope it will help other people
http://bvs-sharepoint.blogspot.com/2015/03/sharepoint-search-is-not-returning.html
RB

Podcast returns "Your search returned no results" but that wasn't the case yesterday

Hello Everyone:
I've been a loyal listener to the 66/40 podcast. It's gone thru some name changes (now it's "66/40 on Oneplace.com") and when I did a search in AppleTV yesterday & today, I got a "Your search returned no results", even though it displays when I search for "66". For weeks now, I've been able to access it. I can access it via the iTunes Store, but no longer on AppleTV. Anyone know why? Any help would be greatly appreeshed.
Thanks.

Same thing happening to me, multiple podcasts, video and audio.

Podcasts "Your search returned no results"

When doing a search under Podcasts in Apple TV (2nd gen), a list show up on the right hand side, but when I click on ANY podcast name, it says "Your search returned no results"
As the producer of one of the podcasts in question, I'm not sure why this is happening. They all show up on my Apple TV 1st Gen, as well as iTunes on my Mac, mobile devices, etc. but NO podcasts that I search for can be accessed in 2nd Gen.
Thanks

Same thing happening to me, multiple podcasts, video and audio.

Search returned no results

Hi Experts,
I had configured backend BW 3.5 connection in the EHP1 for CE 7.1. When I opened VC, I can find the BW system name I configured. I am using dedicated application server configuration. However, when I try to search for query or infoset, it showed "search returned no results". The connection test in system landscape was sucessful. What may be the root cause? Do I need to install any support package in BW 3.5 in order to be searched by VC?
Best Regards
Tom

This message has been opened a long time. Please re post if you have not solved the issue.

SELECT returns no result when there is a default namespace definition inXML

Hi,
I have a problem that my select doesn't return any result when there is a default namespace definition in my XML file.
I'm using oracle 11g release 1
XML file stored as a binary XML:
<SIMS xmlns="http://sims.ics.muni.cz" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://sims.ics.muni.cz jh_sims_matricni_vystupy_or.xsd">
<Vystup Datum="2006-07-18" Typ="2" Nazev="Poslední etapy" PocetStudentu="1" PocetStudii="2">
<Student RodneCislo="8001011001">
<Jmeno>Petr</Jmeno>
</Student>
</Vystup>
</SIMS>
This select return no result:
SELECT student.jmeno FROM jh_sims_bin_no_schema s, XMLTable('/SIMS/Vystup/Student' PASSING s.OBJECT_VALUE COLUMNS jmeno VARCHAR2(10) PATH 'Jmeno') student
When I remove default namespace definition (xmlns="http://sims.ics.muni.cz") everything works fine and the same SELECT returns "Petr". Also when the file is stored in object relational storage everything works fine!
<SIMS xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://sims.ics.muni.cz jh_sims_matricni_vystupy_or.xsd">
<Vystup Datum="2006-07-18" Typ="2" Nazev="Poslední etapy" PocetStudentu="1" PocetStudii="2">
<Student RodneCislo="8001011001">
<Jmeno>Petr</Jmeno>
</Student>
</Vystup>
</SIMS>
Thanks for any help!
Jan Hruby

Hi Jan,
You need to specify the default namespace of the document in the XMLNamespaces clause :
SELECT student.jmeno
FROM jh_sims_bin_no_schema s,
     XMLTable(
      XMLNamespaces(default 'http://sims.ics.muni.cz'),
      '/SIMS/Vystup/Student'
      PASSING s.OBJECT_VALUE
      COLUMNS jmeno VARCHAR2(10) PATH 'Jmeno'
     ) student
;

Services Registry Search Returns 0 Results

I'm following the 3 part walkthrough on CE 7.2 and one step is using VC to connect the CreatePurchaseRequest to a backend web service.
I've exposed the service in ECC, setup the endpoint/service on the Java side for that server, and then published it to the NW CE server. The publish steps return
"Successfully published service definition with key : "uddi:05c3d3ee-f4e4-11df-cab0-0000001b0b3e" " indicating the server sees and has configured it.
However, when searching for the service in VC on my dev system, it keeps returning 0 results in the search. I've looked at documentation for hours and can't find the fix - this seems to span many areas of NW. Can anyone advise of where to look or something else to test on the system/client?
NW WS Navigator can see the endpoint, and I can see the published WS in the NW CE Server. It does have an issue withe a FQDN but other than that tests OK from both systems' WS Nav. Only the NWDS 7.2 SP3 seems to not see it in the Service Repository.
I have confirmed the same results on a XP SP2 client system, and that I can get the default WS's from the CE server but nothing else. The search also shows my ECC server as a search option through the CE server.
Can anyone shed light on this one?
Thanks
System info:
ECC 6.0 EHP4
NW CE 7.2 Win 2008 32 bit running on XP Mode for NWDS
VC 7.2 SP3

hi
check your configuration settings,whether you are connecting to service registry from visual composer or not.
as you are saying you have published the web service so service registry will show the service when you are connected to it
Hope it may help
You can check this link for step by step tutorial.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/e0f78144-fb79-2d10-f986-97347155ec23
check all 4 parts for complete reference and process driven visual composer application.
best regards
suresh

Please Help Urgent:Fast Search returning wrong result sets

Hi All,
We are facing below issue with fast search.
Currently in My project when we are searching for a phrase it is returning wrong result sets.
For example if we search for “Endura”, It is returning documents related to
Endura as well as Centura.
But the expected results are only Endura documents.
When we look in to the documents we didn’t find the search term (“Endura” ) either inside document content or in its meta data.
In order to resolve the issue we tried the below steps
1-
We manually edited and saved the document, to ensure the appropriate Guid association to metadata.
2-
Index reset
3-
Full crawl
But no luck so far.
Please help.Thanks in advance.
Regards
Subrat

Subrat,
This may be related to spellchecking or may be synonym. Spellcheck is based on indexed terms.
The best test would be to run the queries from qrserver (13280) and then look at the spellcheck query transformations. If spellchecking is not doing it, then you must have a synonym setup .Check your keyword/synonyms from the SharePoint side.

Non-local searches return "null" results

I'm creating a Merged help output using AIR Browser Based Help. Said output currently has one major flaw: null search results when viewed over a network.
Now, I have read through the thread on this forum about people who initially got a "null" search result when searching a local project, but with the search subsequently working, and indeed that behavior is what I was initially seeing. That is, on my local copy of the project, my first search would return "null," and then things would work normally. However, when other users accessed my local project over our network, they never got anything other than "null" results. (Quick aside for relevant information: output was from 64-bit RH9, testing is on FIrefox 13 and I.E. 9) If I move my local copy onto the network, I am no longer successful in searching.
I have performed the suggested fix on the whfhost.js file, and while it fixed the problem locally-- I no longer see "null" results-- the problem persists for non-local access. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix this?
Thanks!

For the benefit of anyone else, this is the solution that was provided by Adobe.
Open the generated output folder and open whfhost.js file in the notepad application. Search for the following strings in the file. you need to replace this function
function Query()
gbAIRSearchString = goOdinHunter.strQuery;
g_CurPage = 1;
context = new HuginContext();
context.reset();
context.push( goOdinHunter.query, goOdinHunter,
processHunterResult, null );
context.resume();
With this new function
function isValidType(obj)
return ( (typeof(obj)!='undefined')&&(obj!=null) );
function Query()
gbAIRSearchString = goOdinHunter.strQuery;
g_CurPage = 1;
if (isValidType(context) && isValidType(context.aTasks))
while(context.aTasks.length>0)
context.resume();
context = new HuginContext();
context.reset();
context.push( goOdinHunter.query, goOdinHunter,
processHunterResult, null );
context.resume();
And try running the output and see if you stilll face the null search result problem
If this problem is fixed, then you can go to the C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe RoboHelp 8\RoboHTML\WebHelp5Ext\template_stock folder location, and make the similar changes in the whfhost.js file located in this folder.
It has worked for others so I would first check carefully that you have made the modification correctly.
If you reverse the change, are you back to square one and get a null result first time?
The modification was for RoboHelp 8 or 9. You haven't said what version you are using.
Does it fail with all browsers?
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
@petergrainge

Report obsolete returns diff results when backups are UNAVAIL vs AVAIL

Hello from Nova Scotia, Canada:
I'm wondering if someone out there who lives and breaths rman (10gR2) for a living can shed some light...
We are finding that report obsolete (as well as delete obsolete) are returning different results depending on if our backups
are AVAILABLE or UNAVAILABLE.
In our shop, our backups are changed to UNAVAILABLE because they get moved to a different location later, but delete
obsolete doesn't seem to work as expected unless the backups are AVAILABLE.
I am pasting some output below to demonstrate my point. Basically, in the output you are about to see, I'm showing you
my retention policy and I'm listing the backups that I have (and you can see their status is "A" for available). Then I do a
'report obsolete' command to show you what is considered obsolete (3 files are - which is what I expected). Then I change
all my backups to unavailable. Then I list all my backups again and show you that their status has changed to "U" for unavailable.
Then I do 'report obsolete' again and as you can see, I get different results! Can someone explain this to me?? I have RTFManuals
and no where does it say that availability is a factor that can impact determining what is obsolete. You also see in the output
below what version we're using (10.2.0.4.0) and that we are using a recovery catalog.
If someone would like to see additional information, feel free to ask, I'm more than happy to help you help me.
I should also mention this is a 2 node rac on linux.
Many Thanks.
========================================================
$ rman target / catalog rrc/rg@RRC
Recovery Manager: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Tue May 11 22:06:21 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.
connected to target database: IPCSD (DBID=1703825384)
connected to recovery catalog database
RMAN> show retention policy;
RMAN configuration parameters are:
CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO RECOVERY WINDOW OF 1 DAYS;
RMAN> list backup summary;
List of Backups
===============
Key     TY LV S Device Type Completion Time     #Pieces #Copies Compressed Tag
64093   B F A DISK        05/10/2010 03:06:52 2       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005100300_DB
64122   B A A DISK        05/10/2010 03:08:41 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005100300_ARCHLOGS
64361   B F A DISK        05/10/2010 21:56:33 2       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005102149_DB
64362   B F A DISK        05/10/2010 21:56:37 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005102149_DB
64390   B A A DISK        05/10/2010 21:58:02 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005102149_ARCHLOGS
64508   B F A DISK        05/11/2010 03:07:01 2       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005110300_DB
64509   B F A DISK        05/11/2010 03:07:10 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005110300_DB
64544   B A A DISK        05/11/2010 03:07:47 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005110300_ARCHLOGS
RMAN> report obsolete;
RMAN retention policy will be applied to the command
RMAN retention policy is set to recovery window of 1 days
Report of obsolete backups and copies
Type                 Key    Completion Time    Filename/Handle
Backup Set           64093 05/10/2010 03:06:51
Backup Piece       64097 05/10/2010 03:06:51 /oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005100300/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005100300_BS_1349_PC_2_CP_1_DB
Backup Set           64093 05/10/2010 03:04:01
Backup Piece       64096 05/10/2010 03:04:01 /oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005100300/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005100300_BS_1349_PC_1_CP_1_DB
Backup Set           64122 05/10/2010 03:08:41
Backup Piece       64125 05/10/2010 03:08:41 /oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005100300/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005100300_BS_1351_PC_1_CP_1_ARCHLOGS
RMAN> change backup unavailable;
changed backup piece unavailable
backup piece handle=/oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005100300/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005100300_BS_1349_PC_1_CP_1_DB recid=1533 stamp=718599624
changed backup piece unavailable
backup piece handle=/oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005100300/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005100300_BS_1349_PC_2_CP_1_DB recid=1534 stamp=718599846
changed backup piece unavailable
backup piece handle=/oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005100300/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005100300_BS_1351_PC_1_CP_1_ARCHLOGS recid=1536 stamp=718600043
changed backup piece unavailable
backup piece handle=/oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005102149/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005102149_BS_1354_PC_1_CP_1_DB recid=1539 stamp=718667376
changed backup piece unavailable
backup piece handle=/oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005102149/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005102149_BS_1354_PC_2_CP_1_DB recid=1540 stamp=718667600
changed backup piece unavailable
backup piece handle=/oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005102149/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005102149_BS_1355_PC_1_CP_1_DB recid=1541 stamp=718667797
changed backup piece unavailable
backup piece handle=/oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005102149/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005102149_BS_1356_PC_1_CP_1_ARCHLOGS recid=1542 stamp=718667821
changed backup piece unavailable
backup piece handle=/oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005110300/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005110300_BS_1357_PC_1_CP_1_DB recid=1543 stamp=718686020
changed backup piece unavailable
backup piece handle=/oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005110300/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005110300_BS_1357_PC_2_CP_1_DB recid=1544 stamp=718686253
changed backup piece unavailable
backup piece handle=/oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005110300/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005110300_BS_1358_PC_1_CP_1_DB recid=1545 stamp=718686430
changed backup piece unavailable
backup piece handle=/oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005110300/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005110300_BS_1359_PC_1_CP_1_ARCHLOGS recid=1546 stamp=718686452
Changed 11 objects to UNAVAILABLE status
RMAN> list backup summary;
List of Backups
===============
Key     TY LV S Device Type Completion Time     #Pieces #Copies Compressed Tag
64093   B F U DISK        05/10/2010 03:06:52 2       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005100300_DB
64122   B A U DISK        05/10/2010 03:08:41 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005100300_ARCHLOGS
64361   B F U DISK        05/10/2010 21:56:33 2       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005102149_DB
64362   B F U DISK        05/10/2010 21:56:37 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005102149_DB
64390   B A U DISK        05/10/2010 21:58:02 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005102149_ARCHLOGS
64508   B F U DISK        05/11/2010 03:07:01 2       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005110300_DB
64509   B F U DISK        05/11/2010 03:07:10 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005110300_DB
64544   B A U DISK        05/11/2010 03:07:47 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005110300_ARCHLOGS
RMAN> report obsolete;
RMAN retention policy will be applied to the command
RMAN retention policy is set to recovery window of 1 days
Report of obsolete backups and copies
Type                 Key    Completion Time    Filename/Handle
Backup Set           64362 05/10/2010 21:56:37
Backup Piece       64366 05/10/2010 21:56:37 /oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005102149/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005102149_BS_1355_PC_1_CP_1_DB
RMAN>I just want to point out that the one obsolete file just contains a Control File and a SPFILE, as shown below:
BS Key Type LV Size       Device Type Elapsed Time Completion Time
64362   Full    17.64M     DISK        00:00:02     05/10/2010 21:56:37
        BP Key: 64366   Status: UNAVAILABLE Compressed: NO Tag: HOTBKUP201005102149_DB
        Piece Name: /oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005102149/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005102149_BS_1355_PC_1_CP_1_DB
Control File Included: Ckp SCN: 15213106404   Ckp time: 05/10/2010 21:56:35
SPFILE Included: Modification time: 05/09/2010 18:00:42---------------
**** END *****
Edited by: user478914 on May 12, 2010 3:03 AM
Edited by: user478914 on May 12, 2010 3:24 AM

Thanks for reading my post. Here is the result of doing the crosscheck command.
Problem still exists. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe crosscheck does
nothing because all my backups are listed as unavailable, so there is nothing for it to do.
Any other thoughts or suggestions?
This problem is driving me bonkers. I have read the Backup and Recovery Basic Guide and Advanced Guide,
googled the web, searched OTN, searched Metalink and I can't find anything on the topic of backup
piece availability affecting obsolescence. Many thanks.
RMAN> list backup summary;
List of Backups
===============
Key     TY LV S Device Type Completion Time     #Pieces #Copies Compressed Tag
64361   B F U DISK        05/10/2010 21:56:33 2       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005102149_DB
64362   B F U DISK        05/10/2010 21:56:37 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005102149_DB
64390   B A U DISK        05/10/2010 21:58:02 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005102149_ARCHLOGS
64508   B F U DISK        05/11/2010 03:07:01 2       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005110300_DB
64509   B F U DISK        05/11/2010 03:07:10 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005110300_DB
64544   B A U DISK        05/11/2010 03:07:47 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005110300_ARCHLOGS
64761   B F U DISK        05/12/2010 03:06:23 2       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005120300_DB
64762   B F U DISK        05/12/2010 03:06:30 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005120300_DB
64792   B A U DISK        05/12/2010 03:08:13 1       1       NO         HOTBKUP201005120300_ARCHLOGS
RMAN> crosscheck backup;
using channel ORA_DISK_1
RMAN> report obsolete recovery window of 1 days;
Report of obsolete backups and copies
Type                 Key    Completion Time    Filename/Handle
Backup Set           64362 05/10/2010 21:56:37
Backup Piece       64366 05/10/2010 21:56:37 /oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005102149/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005102149_BS_1355_PC_1_CP_1_DB
Backup Set           64509 05/11/2010 03:07:10
Backup Piece       64520 05/11/2010 03:07:10 /oracle_admin/rman_backups/201005110300/RMAN_HOTBKUP_IPCSD_201005110300_BS_1358_PC_1_CP_1_DB
RMAN>

Exchange 2010 webmail - contact search returns an error when single letter is used

Exchange 2010 SP2 environment. In Webmail when a user creates a new message, pressing on the To: button to add recipients, if they search the GAL, a single letter search (A for example) returns all names starting with A.
If they try to perform the same search for their contacts they get: No results found in IE or the error below in Firefox and Chrome. If I search contacts with two letters "Ab" for example then no error occurs and I get results. So search doesn't work
the same way for contacs vs GAL. Is this normal for webmail 2010?
An unexpected error occurred and your request couldn't be handled.
Request
Url: https://webmail.contoso.com:443/owa/ev.owa?oeh=1&ns=CP&ev=LoadFresh&pfmk=M35:1407960692770;M2:1407960692796;M23:1407960694745
User host address: 10.1.3.9
User: User Name
EX Address: /o=xxxxxxx/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=username
SMTP Address: [email protected]
OWA version: 14.2.247.5
Mailbox server: MBX1.contoso.com
Exception
Exception type: System.NullReferenceException
Exception message: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Call stack
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.Controls.VirtualListView2.GetDidLastSearchFail()
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.Controls.VirtualListView2.LoadData(Int32 startRange, Int32 rowCount)
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.Controls.AddressBookVirtualListView.LoadData(Int32 startRange, Int32 rowCount)
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.VirtualListViewEventHandler2.InternalLoadFresh(Boolean renderHeaders)
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.ContactVirtualListViewEventHandler.LoadFresh()

I doesn't happen on mine, but I'm now on SP3. It might help if you upgrade - even if you don't want to go to SP3 yet, your OWA version appears not to be at rollup 2 level. I only mention this because if it is a problem specific to version 14.2.247.5 (which
could easily be the case, because MS change the OWA scripts with surprising frequency) , it's going to be hard finding people who can reproduce the problem.
But to answer the question in the last sentence, searching the GAL and searching Contacts is, in a technical sense, very different. The GAL search is done with an LDAP query against Active Directory, whereas Contacts are usually going to be mailbox items,
plus a few AD contact items.
OWA For SmartPhone

Spotlight search return no results on fileserver

Spotlight is giving me fits. I had it working at one point, then it spontaneously stopped returning search results.
When clients (all osx10.5.5) perform a search on the file server they only get results for files that have been modified since the last re indexing.
I have tried deleting the spotlight indexes using mdutil -E /
i have tried turning indexing off, rebooting, and then back on .... all with no results.
After the most recent reindexing, i get some results ... but only files that were modified since the last reindexing.
Any suggestions? Or are there any references to spotlight that would explain how this thing works ... or how its suppose to work at least.
btw ... if you log into the server locally, searches results are as you would expect.
permissions on the server is wide open ... all registered uses and see and change all files ... so i don't think its a permissions issue.

Rathelm,
contacting you directly for some help as I'm in the midst of a spotlight issue....
I recent deployed 10.6.6 server, the last Xserve...
10.5+ & 10.6+ clients connect via AFP to sharepoints
In the 1st week clients complained that they cannot find files on server.
I rebuilt all spotlight indexes on all clients macs and on all volumes on the server
Clients were happy and were able to quickly search server....
Approx. 4 days later clients complained again that they cannot find files on server.
Asked manager for specifics and he found that only new files added to the server after the spotlight index rebuild cannot be found.
Clients not happy again..
Have any ideas?
Big thanks

WebHelp Search returning no results when publishing to SharePoint

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for