Weblogic (10.3.2) support on Linux 64 bit?

Hi ,
Does weblogic 10.3.2 (11gR1) supported on Linux x86_64 ? We are using JRockit version BEA JRockit(R) (build R27.6.5-32_o-121899-1.6.0_14-20091001-2113-linux-x86_64, compiled mode)
Can soem body confirm.
Thanks,
Naveen

The link Tom shared goes up to 10.3.0, but for WLS 10.3.1 - also known as 11gR1 11.1.1.1, please check here:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/ias/files/oracle%20fusion%20middleware%2011gR1%20(11.1.1.x)%20certification%20matrix.xls
If the full link doesn't show up - go here:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/ias/files/fusion_certification.html
Note that 10.3.2 of WLS is in FMW 11.1.1.2, which is covered by the FMW 11.1.1.1+ sections of the spreadsheet.
There is a special note in the spreadsheet for 11.1.1.2 minimum JVM requirements:
"Minimum JDK Versions That Apply To Oracle Fusion Middleware 11gR1 (11.1.1.2+)
Oracle Fusion Middleware 11gR1 (11.1.1.2+) requires a minimum JDK version. The following minimum JDK versions apply:
Sun JDK 1.6.0_14+ (32-bit, 64-bit).
Oracle JRockit 6 Update 14 R27.6.5+ (32-bit, 64-bit).
HP JDK 6.0.05+ (32-bit, 64-bit).
IBM JDK 1.6.0 SR6+ (32-bit, 64-bit). Note: IBM JDK 1.6.0 SR6+ can be downloaded from http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/aix/service.html"
Edited by: james.bayer on Jul 8, 2010 1:22 PM

Similar Messages

Does Weblogic Server 5.1 supports RedHat Linux 6.2?

Hello All,
Does Weblogic Server 5.1 supports RedHat Linux 6.2?
Best Regards,
Samuel Yung
[email protected]

FYI.
I am running RH 6.2 and Weblogic 5.10 with no problems.
w/Apache 1.3.12
Only using WL for EJBs and jdbc pool at this time. So your milage may vary.
Michael Girdley wrote:
No, not yet. Version 6.0 will.
The platform support page for WebLogic Server is located at:
http://www.weblogic.com/platforms/index.html
This page has the latest and greatest information on the platforms that
WebLogic is certified and supported on.
Thanks,
Michael
Michael Girdley
BEA Systems Inc
"Samuel Yung" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Hello All,
Does Weblogic Server 5.1 supports RedHat Linux 6.2?
Best Regards,
Samuel Yung
[email protected]
/\/\i|<e
Mike Kincer
Solutions Developer/Engineer
Atlas Commerce "ebusiness evolved"
Office phone: +1-607-741-9988
mailto:[email protected] [http://www.atlascommerce.com]

Does Weblogic Server 5.1 supports RedHat Linux 7?

Does Weblogic Server 5.1 supports RedHat Linux 7?
Thanx in advance.

FYI.
I am running RH 6.2 and Weblogic 5.10 with no problems.
w/Apache 1.3.12
Only using WL for EJBs and jdbc pool at this time. So your milage may vary.
Michael Girdley wrote:
No, not yet. Version 6.0 will.
The platform support page for WebLogic Server is located at:
http://www.weblogic.com/platforms/index.html
This page has the latest and greatest information on the platforms that
WebLogic is certified and supported on.
Thanks,
Michael
Michael Girdley
BEA Systems Inc
"Samuel Yung" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Hello All,
Does Weblogic Server 5.1 supports RedHat Linux 6.2?
Best Regards,
Samuel Yung
[email protected]
/\/\i|<e
Mike Kincer
Solutions Developer/Engineer
Atlas Commerce "ebusiness evolved"
Office phone: +1-607-741-9988
mailto:[email protected] [http://www.atlascommerce.com]

Anyone know when DS will be supported as 64 bit app on Linux?

Anyone know when DS will be supported as 64 bit app on Linux?
Thanks, Mike

It appears on the App store when I open it on my iPhone. Haven't tried installing it as the reviews are rather unflattering at this point, but at least it looks like it should be installable...

Support for 64 bit Linux

Hey macromedia/adobe
When can we have support for 64 bit Linux? The problem is
that most new hardware
is moving towards 64 bit architectures. We have a brand new
server, RedHat
Enterprise 4, coldfusion will not run on it.
Direct Contact: [email protected]

I couldn't agree more - it's insane that an enterprise
product isn't supporting x86_64 instructions in 2007.
On a more constructive note - does anybody out there have a
compiled connector for RHEL or CentOS 4.X, the 64 bit version? I
ask because I've found numerous pages on the web describing how it
works great for people after they compile it on their own. Well, I
can't get it to work. I have CentOS 4.4 x64, and I try to run this
script after successfully installing CFMX 7.0.2 by using the method
to sed out the checks for the right kernels, etc. Here is the
script I try to run inside the connectors/src directory:
/usr/sbin/apxs -c -n jrun20 -S
LIBEXECDIR=/opt/coldfusionmx7/runtime/lib/wsconfig/1/ mod_jrun20.c
jrun_maptable_impl.c jrun_property.c jrun_session.c
platform.c \
jrun_mutex.c jrun_proxy.c jrun_utils.c | more
/usr/sbin/apxs -i -n jrun20 -S
LIBEXECDIR=/opt/coldfusionmx7/runtime/lib/wsconfig/1/ mod_jrun20.la
strip /opt/coldfusionmx7/runtime/lib/wsconfig/1/mod_jrun20.so
All the paths are correct, and when I run it I get about 1000
warning lines from apxs about invalid characters and such in the .c
file. Good times.
Can somebody tell me how the hell to get this to work on 64
bit CentOS 4.x? I'm going crazy here... and Adobe - GET OFF YOUR
***** AND PLEASE ADDRESS THIS ALREADY. IT'S BEEN YEARS SINCE AMD
STARTED SHIPPING THEIR FIRST X64 BIT CHIPS.
This is approaching the no iTunes on Vista level of insanity
here....

Problem installing weblogic server 7.0 in Mandrake Linux 10.1

hi
i am very new to Mandrake Linux ..i have installed Mandrake Linux 10.1 in my machine ...the problem is that when i try i to install weblogic server 7.0 it gives some error
** Error during execution, error code = 11
my machine spec
* 512MB RAM
* 40GB HDD
* P4 2.8GHZ
can any one help me..
the weblogic server i downloaded from bea site its version is weblogic server 7.0 with jrockit (sp6)
regards
babu

Hi,
first of all, unfortunately, WebLogic Server is not supported under Mandrivia (use the right name ;-) ), so you should use Novell Suse or Redhat AS, check this list
Anyway, error code 11 should be related to permission issues, so you should check that the user you are using is allowed to write under the installation directory and under /var/log/
Could you kindly post the log messages?
Regards.
Antenore Gatta
Middleware Specialist
Hequa S.r.l
C.so Buenos Aires 77
20124 Milano
http://www.Hequa.it
Tel +39(0)267493078
Fax +39(0)267493079
Mobile +39 3481537897
______________________________________

Stability of Removable Media support in Linux?

Hey all, I'd previously thought support for removable media in linux was very good, and everthing I've used has been detected and mounted correctly and such, however I have experienced some corruption on them, especially on my microSD, as I've recently lost a few photos.
I'm wondering the current status of the support in linux, is it stable, are there any problems, or is it my configuration?
I use Thunar+Hal to manage my removable media.
Thanks

I have found one "odd" issue with Linux: sometimes it delays writing to some external usb card readers. It might be an issue with the reader but it seems absent in XP. I have a kingston multi card reader. I started using it to run my live Arch (Chakra-Live) because it was faster than an ide sd card adapter (odd); however, if I saved my overlay, the drive would show little activity while it was using squashfs on the overlay, and right at the end, the reader light would start flashing but the machine would shut down while the light was still going... and it always botched the save and lost data. It only happened with the external reader; if the card was mounted on the internal reader on my eee-box, or in the ide adapter, it was fine.
Do make sure you do unmount / safely remove the drive, and maybe wait a few seconds. I know my sandisk micromate has no light, so there is no way of telling if has stopped or not.

Why does Silverlight install process state that my 64-bit Win Vista OS does NOT support the 64-bit version of Silverlight?

As of Monday 4/20, I've encountered a significant problem with Silverlight on my Vista PC.
Several weeks ago I read a brief item stating that Google would be dropping support for npapi and that it would affect Silverlight sometime in April. One of my key daily apps uses Silverlight, but I didn't receive notification from that software's author
about the pending change and how it would be handled. Successfully used the app every week (Mon-Fri) this month for 8-10 hrs/dy day (as I've been doing for the past ~5+ years: past year under Chrome, year before that under FireFox, ~3 prior years
under IE) and on Fri 4/17 shut it down for the weekend. When I booted up on Mon morning and tried to log into the key app however, it prompted me to download and install Silverlight, acting as though I never had it installed!
I recalled the earlier warning about Google dropping support, so I closed Chrome, started up FireFox, but got the same prompt from the app -- it directed me to install Silverlight. I downloaded it (had no choice as to which version, just got the "Silverlight_x64.exe"
file) and got part-way through the install when this error msg popped up: "Unable to Install Silverlight. Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight". WHAT?! Clicking on the "more info"
link led to this msg: "Message ID: 1518. Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight. Click here for the latest version of Silverlight." That link simply led back to the download page which resulted
in receiving another copy of the same executable file.
According to my system ( > Control Panel > System ), I'm running "Windows Vista Home Premium", with a "System Type: 64-bit Operating System". I've been using this same Vista PC since Sep 2008 and running Silverlight for
around the past 5 yrs.
? -- Why doe the Silverlight installer code flag my OS as not supported?
? -- Is there a way to get an older version of Silverlight that will run under Vista?
Thanks in advance for any helpful comments.

Andy -- Thanks for the link, but I'm not adventurous enough to download from a non-MSFT site.
Besides, since I didn't make any changes to my hardware/software config, I expect a MSFT rep to explain why their two programs suddenly stopped working together and then provide whatever code fix is needed. A phone call to their tech support (predictably)
led to nowhere but a recommendation to purchase one of the company's support offerings (which I declined to pursue). The Silverlight development team appears to participate in these forums, so I'd hope one or more of them offers a realistic solution.
Here's something I forgot to mention in my original post: In several of the threads on this subject (some dating back to 2008!), people have
suggested running IE as the browser vs FireFox or Chrome; however, that idea fails to note that the error msg (Message ID:1518) clearly states that "your operating
system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight"; it doesn't say anything about
what browser you're using.

I keep getting this error message "Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight" even though I have a 64 bit system?

Netflix requires Microsoft Silverlight plug in to view their videos. Every time I try to load it I get the following error message...Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight. I have a 64bit system with Windows Vista Home Premium. Firefox 33.0 is installed.
Any suggestions?

Your User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; '''WOW64'''; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0
As said Firefox for Windows from mozilla.org is a 32-bit application. The WOW64 in UA means it is a 32-bit application on 64-bit Windows.
Before you ask if there will be a Win64 version of Firefox. If all goes well the first phase of having Win64 for Release may be as early as Firefox 37.0
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/win64

BUG! Not system locale Filenames support for 32-bit applications error in Windows 8.1 x64 and other microssoft x64 OS-s.

BUG! Not system locale Filenames support for 32-bit applications error in Windows 8.1 x64.
All Windows x64 (XP,2003,2007,Vista,7,8) have no support for not system locale filenames|foldernames for all 32-bit applications. I think it is BUG!
For example, it is possible to read files|folders with French or Chinese in English locale windows installed, rename it, but it is not possible open it, edit or delete. (ERRORS: File not found OR Unknown format)
With using 64-bit programs no such problems. How does it works and how can I fix this? Is it problem with encoding in translating kernel instructions for 32-bit apps in x64 Windows OS's? Whether there are
solutions to this problem OR some hacks|fixes?

Hi,
Have you installed the language package for French or Chinese?
If no, please download the language package and install them.
To download language package, please click the link below,
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/language-packs#lptabs=win7
Best Regards.
Steven Lee
TechNet Community Support

Why Apple does not offer support for linux?

We all know the history of Apple. It clearly shows a trend to be open source, excepting for the licenses they share with Microsoft. In my personal case, I love open source because it has solved several of my problems. Just to share this with everyone, I am the network manager of a educational institution and I used to have my servers running on windows platform. Since we used to buy it all from Microsoft, they would give us free software for or labs, software like Visual Studio. They even assigned us engineers to plan everything for our servers, free of cost. Guess what? It was a disaster. We had our database destroyed by an external attack. We were “lucky” to have Microsoft in our servers and in our firewalls.
We had to take action, so I decided to switch to Debian, and to use IPCOP (a great dedicated firewall, if there is anyone interested, the link is: http://ipcop.org/ , please note, I am NOT affiliated with them, and I will receive no compensation or benefit if you chose to access it or not ). Both open source. The result, no external attack has been able to pass trough. After that, we switched most* of our e-learning platforms to open source, and guess what? We are saving over 60,000 yearly just in software. So for those who are looking for a good way to get good security without loosing an eye, try open source.
Now back to the point, I do not fully support any operative system. They all have their good features, or at least they should. The ones I know, are because I use them. My home network is composed by computers running in five different versions of Linux, two running in Mac OS X Tiger, and some others running in XP pro. My main computer is running in Ubuntu, and is really sad to see that there is no software from apple available for Linux. That is honestly the worst part of Linux, having no iTunes or QuickTime available. No way to see multimedia in the web, etc. A suggestion for apple would be, give support for Linux, there are a lot of us wanting the same.

Apple makes software and hardware. Therefore they
offer a total solution. Now they even can have
windows xp running on their hardware. Making a
version of mac os to run on linix isn't practically.
Under a mac is unix and you can run unix software
with the mac so you could do ever thing you are
doing with a mac.
I did not know Linux was one type of computer, like Mac...
Next topic, If I was willing to pay for it, this thread would not exist, because I can actually use a commercial software to adapt the windows web plug ins to Linux... If I was in charge of Apple, I would propose to develop free software support of my products, - plug ins and so - to other operative systems... But of course, even if I did, it would not be up to me. It would have to pass trough several layers of bureaucracy, and it would take a lot of time to be approved or rejected.
Anyway, the main issue is, the three most important OS's are Windows, Linux, and Mac. And that can't be denied. Now you can even run Windows in a Mac PC, and vice versa... besides being fancy, what else could I do with a Mac PC using Windows, when I can build a machine able to run Windows for less than 300 bucks? OK if you want to try a Mac in a i386 or a x86... but I still rather to be the proud owner of a PowerMac G5 than the owner of a Pentium 4 / AMD using Mac OS.
Also, I thought it would be fun to see the reactions and opinions of other people with this topic, hence, I was not expecting anyone from Mac to read it, and really do something about it, because I know they won't.

Does the new AIR SDK support iOS 64-bit for Flex Developers?

I saw that the new AIR SDK(December 18, 2014) has supported iOS 64-bit, but it was only supported in the new compiler. See this:
Please note that support for creating universal IPA binaries will only be available in the new compiler. The legacy compiler is not (and will not be)
compatible with iOS 64-bit. Because of this, it will be removed with version 16 of the AIR SDK. To ensure that Adobe as well as third party tools
are able to work with this AIR SDK, the -useLegacyAOT option will continue to exist, but will be internally mapped to the new compiler.
AFAIK, the Flex uses the old compiler and AIR SDK for Flex Developers doesn't include ActionScript 2.0 Compiler. As a Flex developer, what shall I do?

Hi,
I guess, you might be packaging IPA on windows machine. Please try latest beta at http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/air.html which has iOS64 support on Windows machine as well.
Thanks
Govinda Gupta

Verizon support of 64 bit systems

:robotmad
VERIZON WIRELESS NONE SUPPORT OF 64 BIT SYSTEMS
My wife and I recently dropped a bundle on a couple droid smart phone pakages without being told up front that the Droid X and I presume other smart phones are not compatible with a 64 bit system when installing the Verizon Media Manager. I do believe that Verizon should be telling all their people to forewarn people about the problem prior to the purchase. Perhaps at least telling them an update is in the makes. When i called Tech support on this, the first person I talked with didn't even know what I was telling her, she put me on permanent hold. I returned the call and talked with a knowledgable person in the know, all he could do was appologize over and over. Verizon should let the consumers know whats going on!!!!!:

Media Manager only handles media; videos, pictures and music. If you want to swap files such as a word processor file, it will not help. As was said, if you tether your phone to your computer with the USB cord, the computer will see the phone as another drive and you can drag and drop all you want, whatever you want.

DVD software that supports adding 24 bit/96 kHz stereo PCM to video

Does anyone know which DVD authoring software supports adding stereo PCM 24 bit/96 kHz files created by say recording using the Audigy 2ZS ?Most DVD authoring/burning software I've seen only seems to recognize/support 48 kHz sampled PCM audio, but video DVDs support both 24 bit/96 kHz stereo (and of course Dolby AC3).

Here is a bit of info. that I have gathered about this:?Useful, readable and still fairly relevant summary on audio DVD-Video and DVD-Audio:?http://24bit.turtleside.com/?----- For audio DVD-Video with support for 24 bit / 96 kHz LPCM ------I have tried the shareware "Audio DVD Creator" and it works fairly well:?http://www.audio-dvd-creator.com/A DVD-Video disk created with 24/96 kHz audio tracks plays in my low-end Toshiba DVD player. The Sourceforge "Lyplex" is very rudimentary, (creates a continuous audio DVD Title .. no graphics). (note that Lyplex requires the wav files to have only 44 byte WAV headers ..!)http://audioplex.sourceforge.net/?---- For DVD-Audio with 24 bit / 96 and 92 kHz support ------Sourceforge DVD-Audio tools:?http://dvd-audio.sourceforge.net/I have used this to create and burn 24 bit/(96/92 kHz) DVD-Audio disks and?they play perfectly using Creative Mediasource DVD-Audio Player 2.00.75 with Audigy 2ZS notebook. (Nero Vision 4 can be used to verify the audio encoding from the iso image and play that image directly before the DVD is actually burnt.)?A useful and up-to-date FAQ on DVD (note section 3.6.2 relevant to audio part):?http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html?Imo the best and most affordable solution (without spending $$$ for DVD authoring software) would be for Nero to update their Nero Vision 4.x to include support for 24 bit/ 96 kHz LPCM. It already has most of the other useful capability in the DVD-Video slide-show creation like synchronizing the added audio tracks to any images etc..

Support for 8-bit pseudocolor visuals on Solaris 10 u8 Virtualbox guest

Hello,
I am running Solaris 10 u8 x86 as a Virtualbox (3.0.8) guest on a WinXP host with a NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 vcard. I use JDS for the Solaris guest, and only 24-bit truecolor visuals are available for the desktop. I desperately need to run Xnest in 8-bit pseudocolor mode for an application. The video driver supplied with the Vbox Solaris guest additions has limited capability, and I think that until that driver is upgraded, I am out of luck. Does anyone have any different thoughts about that?
Is there a way to edit xorg.conf to get support for 8-bit pseudocolor overlay graphics? Wouldchanging the video driver in that file from vboxvideo to either VGA or VESA help? Any advice from an X expert would be GREATLY appreciated.
I've also tried to use svcadm to get the guest to open in 8-bit mode (default depth), but I think that the Vbox video driver (standard and VESA) only support 16- and 32-bit color modes. Is there some other way to get JDS or CDE in the guest to run in 8-bit color?
Thanks.....

sparcmaster wrote:
Regarding expense, I was referring to the dual-headed card you suggested, not Xming.ah. my bad. Though most cards nowadays have dual outputs.
Here is a Vbox report documenting the whole situation, including Sun's replies regarding DirectColor:
http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/4557
it looks like you guys were talking past each other.
>
Note my outputs of xdpyinfo in there: no Pseudocolor visuals in 24-bit mode in the guest (the cause of my problem). My host NVIDIA card has dual DVI outputs, and I have two monitors; are you saying that I set one monitor in Windows to run in 8-bit, and then run Xming on that monitor, and then set up a remote display for my guest, and try and get the guest to display to that remote display? If so, that could be worth a try. If not, maybe I did not fully understand the idea from your first post. I'd rather not have to go out and buy a new dual-headed card unless absolutely necessary.The problem you have is that virtualbox needs a 8 bit display somewhere to send the output to. Send your end display is a windows display in 24 bit mode, it's a lose since windows won't (at least the last time I looked) allow an 8 bit window in a 24 bit desktop. You could try running the main windows display in 8 bit mode and then starting virtual box, but odds of things going in your favor is not great.
Your new idea of running a vnc server in 8-bit mode within Solaris is very interesting indeed. I am unfamiliar with vnc. I saw this page:
http://www.softpanorama.org/Xwindows/VNC/vnc_on_solaris.shtml
It says that VNC comes with Solaris 10 u5, on the companion CD. I assume that u8 has it also.Somewhere along the line, sun began do bundle vnc as a part of solaris proper. It should be in /bin/vncserver.
I'll look into that. If you know of any other source of info on vnc, please let me know. Thank you VERY MUCH for the suggestion!!!Here's more or less what you should do:
1) login to your virtual solaris box
2) Start up a 8 bit vnc server by typing "vncserver -depth 8 :1"
3) After the setup questions (if I remember, you need to at least set a password), you can connect to the vncserver by
typing "vncviewer :1" and entring the password.
You could also get a windows VNC viewer and connect to the solaris vnc server. This may render faster, since you aren't running the vncviewer in a virtual session.
4) In the vnc viewer display (which may look funny because the default setup is usually a horriffic twm session), start your Xnest.
If you want cde, edit your .vnc/xstartup to look like:
#!/bin/sh
xrdb $HOME/.Xresources
xsetroot -solid grey
dtterm -geometry 80x24+10+10 -ls -title "$VNCDESKTOP Desktop" &
dtwm &
If you want jds, replace the dttterm/dtwm with gnome-panel.
-r

Weblogic (10.3.2) support on Linux 64 bit?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for