Website fonts does not look correct.

When I open some sites it does not show the font clearly and very difficult to read. IE or chrome usage looks good which I am doing now. Want to use Firefox again.
Firefox version: 28.0
OS: Windows 7.
Example site: http://www.ndtv.com/news/
Troubleshooting.
Without addon: Same issue
Safe mode: Same Issue
New profile for firefox: same issue.
Even for this site the font are not looking correct.

Could you check Windows 7's ClearType settings? Unlike IE, Firefox relies on your Windows 7 settings for anti-aliasing.
Did the font quality change suddenly and, if so, can you associate it with any Firefox or Windows updates? Or graphics card driver updates?
This site uses a font named Open Sans which is downloaded. If Firefox isn't able to download the font, it will substitute something it believes is similar. Perhaps you are getting a terrible substitution??

Similar Messages

A page that looked fine in the last version does not look correct at all in 3.6.3, although it looks fine in both IE6 and IE8

This is a log-in page, which points to our email registration software's server (Tikit's Emerge Reaction Server). If you open in it in the last version of FF, it looks as expected. The page renders fine in IE6 and IE8, and all our other website pages (www.mofo.com) render fine in both ver. of FF - its just the pages that point to our emerge-reaction server site that won't render properly. Tikit says we are the only user having this problem, and they don't know what the problem is caused by. Help!?
== URL of affected sites ==
http://emerge-reaction.mofo.com/reaction/RSLogin.asp?eventId=TOPICS

Looks like a problem with the [http://emerge-reaction.mofo.com/reaction/styles/RS.css CSS file]: missing quote in url and a trailing, extra, '}' in line 331
See the Tools > Error Console.
<code>.header }
.header
</code>

Font does not display correctly...

When setting my default language to 'Vietnamese', I cannot get Google and Gmail pages to load up correctly; boxes appear where the font is unknown. I have tested this on the latest Safari, OmniWeb, Firefox and on 2 other iMacs both running Tiger with no avail. To test this yourself without causing anything permanent to your system, visit google.com and change default language to Vietnamese under language settings (there's a link at the bottom to revert back to english). There will be one or two characters at the bottom of the page with boxes instead of letters. This effect is worsened when you visit Gmail in Vietnamese. I've tried installing different fonts and changing up the encoding, but nothing has worked so far. Can someone shed some light on this, or even better yet, can someone just tell me how to fix it? I've spent over a week on this issue and cannot figure it out. PLEASE HELP!!!

I forgot to add that Vietnamese seems to appear correctly on all other webpages on the internet, just doesn't seem to work right on Google pages... This wouldn't be that big of an issue, but I just got my dad a Mac and he can only read and write in Vietnamese, and of course I had to get him a gmail account when we were showing him how to email on a PC... Now I'm trying to get him accustomed to using a Mac and his email doesn't work correctly...

Font does not size correctly in iPhone summary screen

I recently bought a iPhone 4 and when I connect to iTunes I notice that the Dutch text is not completely shown with the iPhone device detail.
It was caused by the fact that I had increased the font size in Windows to 125%.
Scaling it down to 100% solved the problem. Seems like a general issue.
But I need the bigger font.

Unless 'Script MT Bold' is installed on the end user's system, it won't display.
I generally use Win/Mac safe fonts for the bulk of my site.
http://www.ampsoft.net/webdesign-l/WindowsMacFonts.html
When a special font is required, I use TypeKit's hosted Web Fonts.
https://typekit.com/
Nancy O.

My website upload does not look like the preview

I used 398 nature template to make a new website (using DreamWeaver). Everything went well until I uploaded the files to the server. Here is the preview:
Here is what it looks like now that I've uploaded it to the server:
Any suggestions would be appreciated!

When you Define a Site in DW, you keep all of your site's files in a local root folder. When you upload to your server, you're moving the content of your local root to the server root folder.
Basically, aside from some possible "server only" files/folders (like the cgi-bin folder for example), your local site and remote site directory structures should match exactly.
So, if you have your .css files in a folder called css that's on the same directory level as your index.html page locally, the remote .css files must also be found within a css folder on the same directory level as the remote index.html page.

Devanagari font in layed out in Indesign (using IndicPlus) does not export correctly to a PDF.

Namaste InDesign gurus,
I have a problem at hand. Wondering if anyone has encoutered similar problem before? Any help is greatly appreciated. And if you're in San Francisco bay area - I can buy you a lunch :-)
Short description: Devanagari font in layed out in Indesign (using IndicPlus) does not export correctly to a PDF. All the ligatures are assembled and displayed in the PDF.
Adobe Indesign Version: InDesign CS5 Design Premium - regular U.S. version (not ME).
Steps I took:
I purchased CS5 Design Premium and also purchased the IndicPlus plugin to author sanskrit documents in InDesign. I create Sanskrit text using either of the following methods.
1) Itranslator
2) Paste the devanagari from the Itranslator directly into InDesign or paste it first into MSWord and then copy from MSWord and paste it to Indesign.
It doesn't matter how I paste it. After I apply the IndicPlus character/paragraph style so that the sanskrit looks good in InDesign, when I try to export it to a PDF. The PDF does not display the ligatures currectly. It just lists all the characters in order without assembling.
I've spent a lot of money buying CS5, IndicPlus and then I can't even create a simple PDF document from InDesign. It is very frustrating.
Has anyone been able to successfully export a sanscrit document from InDesign PDF ?
(Please let me know if my problem description needs more fleshing out).
I could create the PDF from MSWord directly but I'm trying to use indesign to layout my book. If InDesign cannot export to PDF I'll just have to use MSWord for my book layout. I've spend probably scores of hours trying to learn InDeisn and formatting my book content - seems like it is all going to be waste.
Is MSWord the best choice or only choice for laying out books that have sanskrit text in them?
-Ravi

Has anyone been able to successfully export a sanscrit document from InDesign PDF ?
Not Sanskrit, no, but plenty of Hindi, Nepali, Marathi, and other languages written in Devanagari script - so it should be possible. I don't even use IndicPlus, which by most accounts makes working with Indic text much easier.
1) Itranslator
I've never seen this, but a quick Google led me to the homepage of ITranslator for Windows, where I saw this:
Itranslator 99 (Build 1.3.0.86) & New Beta Version
uses 8-bit true type fonts and is compatible
with Windows 95/98/ME/NT/2000/XP.
For more information, click here.
Itranslator 2003 (Build 2.0.0.38) & New Beta Version
uses 16-bit Unicode-compatible fonts and is working
only on Windows 2000 / XP / Server 2003.
For more information, click here.
So, if you're using ITranslator 99, there's the problem - those "8-bit true type fonts" won't work in InDesign. Can you post a sample of the text you're trying to paste into InDesign? Name the font(s) you are using, both in Word and in Indesign, and if possible make a small sample of the text available for us to test. It's also possible that InDesign is using a substituted font, which could cause this problem. So, if the font name in InDesign has brackets around it, you know that InDesign doesn't actually have that font installed and is auto-substituting. Also, if you go to View -> Screen Mode -> Normal and the text is highlighted pink, you know that the font has dropped. (Unless the highlighting for dropped fonts was turned off - check in Edit -> Preferences -> Composition and make sure that "Substituted Fonts" is checked.
Also, for what it's worth, is there any way you could Place your text instead of copying and pasting? This may be cause of your problem - but even though it probably isn't, it's still worth a try.
Lastly - no, I've found InDesign to be superior for typesetting for almost all languages, but the learning curve is pretty steep, and many of the problems faced by people working in non-English languages are not easy to research when you have a problem.

Conversion does not look the same?

I converted a pdf file to a word document last night and the page does not look the same. It is a weekly time log and the lines are messed up and the font is not placed correctly. Is there any way to fix this?

Good day,
What you described is fairly common for conversions where the PDF file that's being converted to Word wasn't originally created from Word. The service does the best it can to interpret the font data as well as the formatting, but as that information is often not present within the code of the PDF file, sometimes the resulting Word document does not exactly resemble the PDF file.
Kind regards,
David
Acrobat Community Manager
Adobe Systems

Fonts are not displaying correctly

Hello,
I was not quite sure where to post this problem, but I hope it will work out here.
The problem: Sometimes my laptop (HP Elitebook 2540p connected to a dockingstation) acts very weird. The letters (inside any program) become black/grey rectangles for no reason. Then I have to reboot my laptop and everything works fine, again.
I think a picture says more than hundred words, so here it is:
http://i.imgur.com/pwFkc0J.png?1
As you can see I am using i3 desktop environment and this "problem" exists across applications.
Is this some kind of hardware/graphics issue or something software specific?? It does not look very good
Hope someone can help me..?
-- mod edit: read the Forum Etiquette and only post thumbnails http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … s_and_Code [jwr] --
Last edited by i3 (2015-04-16 12:37:05)

I doubt this is a hardware issue – hardware issues are agnostic of specific characters, as this is the case it seems:
There's no 'c' or 't' not corrupted and on the other hand – it seems – no corrupted 'd's.
Have you just tried setting the font to something different?

Adobe Acrobat Pro X 10.1.7 (Mac) does not print correctly.

I have a Mac Pro (Model 1.1) with Adobe Acrobat X 10.1.7. When an item is scanned, it appears correctly on the screen, but it does not print correctly. I am sending along screenshots of what a scanned item looks like on the screen and then what prints.
Message was edited by: DFSons Added photos

Thanks Michael, have tried that, no luck. I will wait a couple of days to see if any other solutions come up (or if anyone else is suddenly having the same issue) before reinstalling Acrobat.
[OK just tried sending a PDF attachment directly from another program (MYOB) through to Mac Mail and had the same problem so it is not an Acrobat issue afterall, it is a Mac Mail or Mac OS X issue. Will post this on the Apple site.]
I have resolved the MYOB issue, it was working just painfully slow. So I still have the original Acrobat Pro PDF to Mac Mail issue if anyone knows of any solutions please?
Message was edited by: jmgd

Navigation Drop Down Menu Does Not Appear Correctly with Internet Explorer.

Website was designed with Dreamweaver CS5 on a Mac. The navigation drop down menu does not appear correctly with Internet Explorer. When you mouse over a navigation option that has a drop-down menu, the drop-down portion appears on top of the first level. Hope someone can help me out.Thanks!
http://www.catchaghosttoursofkansas.com

Hi,
and you should then iron out this minor inaccuracy, which I found in your source code, for example here:
<div align="center"><a class="MenuBarItemSubmenu" href="hays.html">HAYS</a>
        <ul>
          <li><a href="hayswalkingtour.html">Walking Tour</a> </li>
          <li><a href="forthays.html">Fort Hays</a></li>
        </ul>
All your "first" entries have to show a '#", like this:
      <div align="center"><a class="MenuBarItemSubmenu" href="#">HAYS</a>
        <ul>
          <li><a href="hayswalkingtour.html">Walking Tour</a> </li>
          <li><a href="forthays.html">Fort Hays</a></li>
        </ul>
      </div>
after that you can link to the individual subgroups. See here e.g. (screenshots from my German DW):
Hans-G.

Satellite M645-S4050: built in camera does not work correctly

My built in camera does not work correctly.
It does not have any kind of effect on and it captures pictures and videos as if some kind of thermal camera was on.
Also some videos I load up on youtube look like this.
I have been researching for an answer but can't find it, please help me.

All you can do is to test it with latest webcam driver.
Remove preinstalled camera software and install latest version offered on Toshiba download page.
If the same happen again visit nearest Toshiba service and show them how it looks like. Maybe the cam must be exchanged.
In the past I have used several Toshiba laptops with built in cam but I have never saw something lke this.

Mozilla Addons site does not load correctly in IE - impala-min.js

It seems that the Mozilla Addons website does not load correctly any more in IE and the errors below are generated on XP (IE8), Windows 7 (IE9) and Windows 8 (IE10). It seems to be a JavaScript error from the messages from webpage error popup.
Browsing any addon specific page (NoScript, Menu Editor, Flashblock, etc) all seem to hang with the
'loading-more.gif' graphic showing constantly and none of the lower tabs (Version Information, etc) will open to show information.
I know technically this isn't a Firefox issue but I use IE to check version compatibility of addons before loading in Firefox. Perverse I know but hey it works, or used to until very recently.

This wasn't a question about loading Firefox extensions in IE which would not have a clue about the contents of the .XPI file.
This was about an error on the addons page which seems to stop ANY of the pages from showing details of the extension such as user reviews, developer feedback and version history...
Viewing from Firefox they just show as compatible and versions over 3.6 but from IE you could see what versions the extension was compatible with, ie 9 thru 15 which is far more helpful when deciding which to deploy in a workplace.
Have tried this on four different machines with the same outcome for viewing in IE!

Oops - spry menu bar 2.0 does not display correctly when loaded

Oops - obviously I'm new at this. I think I got my graphics loaded now.
Dear Sirs:
I notice bzz31 had a pretty complicated post, so perhaps someone can help me with my complicated problem that has been vexing me for months. I tried the Spry Menu Bar 1.0, but it was impossible for me to edit, and I was delighted to see Spry Menu Bar 2.0 come out. However the 2.0 version has been frustrating me as well.
I can get my menu bar to display properly in Live View, as shown below.
However when I load everything onto the server, the menu bar does not display correctly, as shown below:
I don't quite understand the code "file:///" but I interpret it to mean that the Spry-UI-1.7 folder is in the topmost folder of MacPro5-Docs, which is my hard drive. Here's the code I'm having trouble with:
Here's my computer directory, shown below:
Since my index file is two folders down from Spry-UI-1.7, I loaded the files onto the server similarly, as shown in the next three pictures:
(The picture below is the same as the one just above, but now you can see the path from index to Spry-UI-1.7.)
I would be most appreciative if someone can help me.
Thank you.

Have a look at the following links
<script src="file:///MacProG5-Docs/Spry-UI-1.7/includes/SpryDOMUtils.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="file:///MacProG5-Docs/Spry-UI-1.7/includes/SpryDOMEffects.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="file:///MacProG5-Docs/Spry-UI-1.7/includes/SpryWidget.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="file:///MacProG5-Docs/Spry-UI-1.7/includes/SpryMenu.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="file:///MacProG5-Docs/Spry-UI-1.7/includes/plugins/MenuBar2/SpryMenuBarKeyNavigationPlugin.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="file:///MacProG5-Docs/Spry-UI-1.7/includes/plugins/MenuBar2/SpryMenuBarIEWorkaroundsPlugin.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<link href="file:///MacProG5-Docs/Spry-UI-1.7/css/Menu/basic/SpryMenuBasic.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
Each of the above points to a file on your local system and cannot be found by the remote server.
Replace the red coloured parts with http://www.twhsbands.org/ will remedy the situation.
You also have some remnants of the other SpryMenuBar that should be removed from your markup.
Gramps
Wel, so much for the red coloured parts, they did not show up.
The red coloured parts read file:///MacProG5-Docs/

I have a manual that contains headings and index entries that contain less than and greater than characters, and . The Publish to Responsive HTML5 function escapes these correctly in the main body of the text but does not work correctly in either the C

I have a manual that contains headings and index entries that contain less than and greater than characters, < and >. The Publish to Responsive HTML5 function escapes these correctly in the main body of the text but does not work correctly in either the Contents or the Index of the generated HTML. In the Contents the words are completely missing and in the index entries the '\' characters that are required in the markers remain in the entry but the leading less than symbol and the first character of the word is deleted; hence what should appear as <dataseries> appears as \ataseries\>. I believe this is a FMv12 bug. Has anyone else experienced this? Is the FM team aware and working on a fix. Any suggestions for a workaround?

The Index issue is more complicated since in order to get the < and > into the index requires the entry itself to be escaped. So, in order to index '<x2settings>' you have to key '\<x2settings\>'. Looking at the generated index entry in the .js file we see '<key name=\"\\2settings\\>\">. This is a bit of a mess and produces an index entry of '\2settings\>'. This ought to be '<key name=\"&lt;x2settings&gt;\" >'. I have tested this fix and it works - but the worst of it is that the first character of the index entry has been stripped out. Consequently I cannot fix this with a few global changes - and I have a lot of index entries of this type. I'm looking forward to a response to this since I cannot publish this document in its current state.

Shooting "squeezed" 16:9 does not look quite right when exported to 16:9

Hard to put a title which would cover the problem well, probably hard to describe it well, too, for an amateur:)
Anyway, I have a cheap JVC GR-D320E which serves me well as a beginner´s camera (for the price I gave) but when I shoot in what it calls 16:9 mode which I have understood it is not true 16:9 but in a way squeezed, and I import this to FCE (set to Anamorphic PAL), it all looks good within FCE but when I export it using QT Conversions and setting the proportions and size manually to what is supposed to be the right dimensions for 16:9 PAL (1024x576 if I remember it correctly) it does not look right. The persons "grow shorter and fatter", if you know what I mean.
I have tried to change the dimensions in QT Pro, but the problem is to find the correct ones. I also wonder why this happens and if there actually are "correct" proportions which then would be something between 16:9 and 4:3 or if I am doing something wrong?
When I export not using QT Conversions, the result is 4:3 which isn´t right, either...
Well, hope I have been able to describe this in a way which is possible to understand...

I want to export it for several purposes; all you mention, in fact; to put on the web, to play on the monitor and to make a DVD. As I mentioned, when I exported as a QuickTime movie, it came out as a 4:3 and that of course, looked awful.
Using the conversions, I can scale it as I want to, but to me 16:9 does not look exactly right, either. That is why I wanted to know if there are some proportions in between the 4:3 and 16:9 which is appropriate for footage which is not filmed in true 16:9 but in this option which cheaper cameras have.
The article you linked to, did not tell anything new, alas.

Website fonts does not look correct.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for