Webstart to Servlet Performance Issues

Hi. I have a application that connects to a servlet to do database operations on a server. When it runs as either an application or an applet, the performance is great. However, when I try to deploy it with WebStart, the performance is terrible, a database lookup taking 40 secs to 1 minute, when a lookup would previously take 5-10 seconds. Has anyone else seen this? The hang up is in the DBConnect function listed bleow:
     public boolean DBConnect (String DBHost) {               
          String DBConnStr = DBHost;
          boolean ret = true;
          try {
               url = new URL(DBConnStr);
          } catch (Exception ex) {
               ret = false;
               System.out.println("Failed to create URL " + url.toString());
          try {
               con = (java.net.HttpURLConnection) url.openConnection();
               con.setDoOutput(true);
               con.setUseCaches(false); // to ensure that we do contact
                                                                 // the servlet and don't get
                                                                 // anything from the browser's
                                                                 // cache
               con.setDoInput(true); // only if reading response
               con.connect();
          } catch (Exception ex) {
               ret = false;
               System.out.println("Failed to connect to db servlet...");
          return ret;
Thanks,
Dan

Hi
I want to access a servlet from a WS Application and have performance problem Where did you set SecurityManager to null? In the servlet, or in your WS-Application?
If I set the SecurityManager to null in the Application which should access the servlet, I can't start the Application (and it is o.k). After that I tryed in the servlet as follow:
System.setSecurityManager(null);But, after that it wasn't better. Could you show me, how did you set SecurityManager to null (and where).
Thanks a lot.
P.S. In the WebStart I tryed two options: Proxi: withoutand Proxi:Webbrowser directBut it didin't help to.

Similar Messages

  • Performance issues in bw

    Hi All,
    What is buffering number?How it is useful in performance issue? Tell me the option where it is available? To set this what are navigational steps?
    Thanks inadvance.
    Yogeswar

    Hi Yogi,
    A nice weblog by Vikas Please do check this.on number range buffering,
    /people/vikash.agrawal/blog/2006/04/05/load-lots-of-data-147faster148-with-buffering-number-range
    Check these links.
    FAQ - The Future of SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence in the Light of the NetWeaver BI&Business Objects Roadmap
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/developerareas/bi?rid=/webcontent/uuid/b4674415-0b01-0010-ae81-deb009860b7e [original link is broken]
    following are the links that may help you
    http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/s-u/sap%20bw%20business%20planning%20and%20simulation%20-%20how%20to%20guides%20list.htm
    http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cccad390-0201-0010-5093-fd9ec8157802
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/afbad390-0201-0010-daa4-9ef0168d41b6
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b7bdde90-0201-0010-26b1-dcda5e0b394d
    How to improve performance in reporting side?
    Query Performance Techniques:
    1. Check Query properties—Use RSRT tcode
    2. Check whether cube is compressed
    3. Optimize query definition
    4. Analyze query execution
    5. Check for additional indexes
    6. Archive unwanted data
    7. Check for partitioning options
    8. Check for additional aggregates ( Consider DB ratio and KPI ratio)
    9. Check for parallelization options
    10. Use Nav attributes instead of hierarchies, use free char and filters.
    Possible causes for the performance :
    A) High Database Runtime
    B) High OLAP Runtime
    C) High Frontend Runtime
    Depending upon your analysis
    A)Strategy - High Database Runtime
    Check if an aggregate is suitable (use All data to get values "selected records to transferred records", a high number here would be an indicator for query performance improvement using an aggregate)
    Check if database statistics are update to data for the Cube/Aggregate, use Tcode RSRV output (use database check for statistics and indexes)
    Check if the read mode of the query is unfavourable - Recommended (H)
    B)Strategy - High OLAP Runtime
    Check if a high number of Cells transferred to the OLAP (use "All data" to get value "No. of Cells")
    a) Use RSRT technical Information to check if any extra OLAP-processing is necessary (Stock Query, Exception Aggregation, Calc. before Aggregation, Virtual Char. Key Figures, Attributes in Calculated Key Figs, Time-dependent Currency Translation) together with a high number of records transferred.
    b) Check if a user exit Usage is involved in the OLAP runtime?
    c) Check if large hierarchies are used and the entry hierarchy level is as deep as possible. This limits the levels of the hierarchy that must be processed.
    C)Strategy - High Frontend Runtime
    1) Check if frontend PC are within the recommendation (RAM, CPU Mhz)
    2) Check if the bandwidth for WAN connection is sufficient.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1e553368-0601-0010-49ab-c429607f3eb3
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5401ab90-0201-0010-b394-99ffdb15235b
    check this, you can download lot of performance materials
    Business Intelligence Performance Tuning [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    and e-learning -> intermediate course and advance course
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/developerareas/bi?rid=/webcontent/uuid/fe5b0b5e-0501-0010-cd88-c871915ec3bf [original link is broken]
    e.g
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/media/uuid/10b589ad-0701-0010-0299-e5c282b7aaad
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/media/uuid/d9fd84ad-0701-0010-d9a5-ba726caa585d
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/media/uuid/8e6183ad-0701-0010-e083-9ab1c6afe6f2
    performance tools in bw 3.5
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/media/uuid/07a4f070-0701-0010-3b91-a6bf7644c98f
    (here also you can download the presentation by righ click the disk drive icon)
    Check the following links,
    FAQ - The Future of SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence in the Light of the NetWeaver BI&Business Objects Roadmap
    Business Intelligence Performance Tuning [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/06/b5f8926ba22b45bc9eaa589f1c835b/content.htm
    Some bw docs/ performance material
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1955ba90-0201-0010-d3aa-8b2a4ef6bbb2
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3a699d90-0201-0010-bc99-d5c0e3a2c87b
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4c0ab590-0201-0010-bd9a-8332d8b4f09c
    and don't miss bw performance knowledge centre, there are e-learning
    Business Intelligence Performance Tuning [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    Hope this Helps.
    <removed>
    Regards,
    Ravikanth.

  • Performance issues in XI

    Hi Experts,
       Can any one help me when we get performance issues in XI, can any body give me some examples.
    thanks,
    dhanush

    Hi
    Here are some helpful links
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/9e/6921e784677d4591053564a8b95e7d/frameset.htm
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/489f5844-0c01-0010-79be-acc3b52250fd
    XI Performance Testing Tool
    Try performance tuning :
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70ada5ef-0201-0010-1f8b-c935e444b0ad
    Some blog covering the Performance issues in XI:
    Performance Tuning Checks in SAP Exchange Infrastructure: /people/prasad.illapani/blog/2007/03/08/performance-tuning-checks-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
    Performance Tuning Checks in SAP Exchange Infrastructure(XI): Part-II: /people/prasad.illapani/blog/2007/04/20/performance-tuning-checks-in-sap-exchange-infrastructurexi-part-ii
    Resource consumption for the mapping depends on the complexity of the mappings and the source document sizes.Java mappings use XI Mapping Toolkit.Graphical Mappings are much faster because the code beneath is highly efficient.
    Get back if you have more doubts.
    Thanks

  • HtmlKona performance issues?

    The majority of our content is dynamic in nature and stored in an
    underlying database. One of the decisions our group took was to use the
    htmlKona API to create htmlPages rendered by our Servlets.
    We are now finding that this may have been a bad choice since we seeing
    that this may be causing us severe performance problems due to object
    creation and what seems to be an excessive amount of String creation
    within the Server. Are there any known performance issues regarding the
    use of htmlKona?
    Are there any performance techniques using htmlKona currently
    recommended or being used to help aleviate object creation? (i.e.
    Reusing an html object and sending its output to StringBuffer, instead
    of using an HtmlContainer)
    Thanks,
    Don DeLuca

    Hi,
    you should analyze the db after you have loaded the tables.
    Do you use sequences to generate PKs? Do you have a lot of indexex and/or triggers on the tables?
    If yes:
    make sure your sequence caches (alter sequence s cache 10000)
    Drop all unneeded indexes while loading and disable trigger if possible.
    How big is your Redo Log Buffer? When loading a large amount of data it may be an option to enlarge this buffer.
    Do you have more then one DBWR Process? Writing parallel can speed up things when a checkpoint is needed.
    Is it possible using a direct load? Or do you already direct load?
    Dim

  • Report Performance Issue - Activity

    Hi gurus,
    I'm developing an Activity report using Transactional database (Online real time object).
    the purpose of the report is to list down all contacts related activities and activities NOT related to Contact by activity owner (user id).
    In order to fullfill that requirment I've created 2 report
    1) All Activities related to Contact -- Report A
    pull in Acitivity ID , Activity Type, Status, Contact ID
    2) All Activities not related to Contact UNION All Activities related to Contact (Base report) -- Report B
    to get the list of activities not related to contact i'm using Advanced filter based on result of another request which is I think is the part that slow down the query.
    <Activity ID not equal to any Activity ID in Report B>
    Anyone encountered performance issue due to the advanced filter in analytic before?
    any input is really appriciated
    Thanks in advanced,
    Fina

    Fina,
    Union is always the last option. If you can get all record in one report, do not use union.
    since all records, which you are targeting, are in the activity subject area, it is not nessecery to combine reports. add a column with the following logic
    if contact id is null (or = 'Unspecified') then owner name else contact name
    Hopefully, this is helping.

  • Report performance Issue in BI Answers

    Hi All,
    We have a performance issues with reports. Report is running more than 10 mins. we took query from the session log and ran it in database, at that time it took not more than 2 mins. We have verified proper indexes on the where clause columns.
    Could any once suggest to improve the performance in BI answers?
    Thanks in advance,

    I hope you dont have many case statements and complex calculations that you do in the Answers.
    Next thing you need to monitor is how many rows of data that you are trying to retrieve from the query. If the volume is huge then it takes time to do the formatting on the Answers as you are going to dump huge volumes of data. Database(like teradata) returns initially like 1-2000 records if you hit show all records then even db is gonna fair amount of time if you are dumping many records
    hope it helps
    thanks
    Prash

  • BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue

    Hi Masters,
    I am working out for a solution for BW report developed in 0bcs_vc10 virtual cube.
    Some of the querys is taking more 15 to 20 minutes to execute the report.
    This is huge performance issue. We are using BW 3.5, and report devloped in bex and published thru portal. Any one faced similar problem please advise how you tackle this issue. Please give the detail analysis approach how you resolved this issue.
    Current service pack we are using is
    SAP_BW 350 0016 SAPKW35016
    FINBASIS 300 0012 SAPK-30012INFINBASIS
    BI_CONT 353 0008 SAPKIBIFP8
    SEM-BW 400 0012 SAPKGS4012
    Best of Luck
    Chris
    BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue

    Ravi,
    I already did that, it is not helping me much for the performance. Reports are taking 15 t0 20 minutes. I wanted any body in this forum have the same issue how
    they resolved it.
    Regards,
    Chris

  • Interested by performance issue ?  Read this !  If you can explain, you're a master Jedi !

    This is the question we will try to answer...
    What si the bottle neck (hardware) of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6
    I used PPBM5 as a benchmark testing template.
    All the data and log as been collected using performance counter
    First of all, describe my computer...
    Operating System
    Microsoft Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
    CPU
    Intel Xeon E5 2687W @ 3.10GHz
    Sandy Bridge-EP/EX 32nm Technology
    RAM
    Corsair Dominator Platinum 64.0 GB DDR3
    Motherboard
    EVGA Corporation Classified SR-X
    Graphics
    PNY Nvidia Quadro 6000
    EVGA Nvidia GTX 680   // Yes, I created bench stats for both card
    Hard Drives
    16.0GB Romex RAMDISK (RAID)
    556GB LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed (RAID 0)
    I have other RAID installed, but not relevant for the present post...
    PSU
    Cosair 1000 Watts
    After many days of tests, I wanna share my results with community and comment them.
    CPU Introduction
    I tested my cpu and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit, can I reach this limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 1).
    Intro : I tested my E5-XEON 2687W (8 Cores Hyperthread - 16 threads) to know if programs can use the maximum of it.  I used Prime 95 to get the result.  // I know this seem to be ordinary, but you will understand soon...
    The result : Yes, I can get 100% of my CPU with 1 program using 20 threads in parallel.  The CPU gives everything it can !
    Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test...
    (picture 1)
    Disk Introduction
    I tested my disk and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 2).
    Intro : I tested my RAID 0 556GB (LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed) to know if I can reach the maximum % disk usage (0% idle Time)
    The result : As you can see in picture 2, yes, I can get the max of my drive at ~ 1.2 Gb/sec read/write steady !
    Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test to see the impact of transfering many Go of data during ~10 sec...
    (picture 2)
    Now, I know my limits !  It's time to enter deeper in the subject !
    PPBM5 (H.264) Result
    I rendered the sequence (H.264) using Adobe Media Encoder.
    The result :
    My CPU is not used at 100%, the turn around 50%
    My Disk is totally idle !
    All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
    The transfert rate seem to be a wave (up and down).  Probably caused by (Encrypt time....  write.... Encrypt time.... write...)  // It's ok, ~5Mb/sec during transfert rate !
    CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
    RAM, more than enough !  39 Go RAM free after the test !  // Excellent
    ~65 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
    GPU Load on card seem to be a wave also ! (up and down)  ~40% usage of GPU during the process of encoding.
    GPU Ram get 1.2Go of RAM (But with GTX 680, no problem and Quadro 6000 with 6 GB RAM, no problem !)
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (50%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (60%), RAM is free (62%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process.  Why ????  Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
    Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result !
    (picture 3)
    PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (RAID LSI)
    I rendered the sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder on my RAID 0 LSI disk.
    The result :
    My CPU is not used at 100%
    My Disk wave and wave again, but far far from the limit !
    All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
    The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down).  Probably caused by (Buffering time....  write.... Buffering time.... write...)  // It's ok, ~375Mb/sec peak during transfert rate !  Easy !
    CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
    RAM, more than enough !  40.5 Go RAM free after the test !  // Excellent
    ~48 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
    GPU Load on card = 0 (This kind of encoding is GPU irrelevant)
    GPU Ram get 400Mb of RAM (No usage for encoding)
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (65%), disks are free (60%), GPU is free (100%), RAM is free (63%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process.  Why ????  Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
    (picture 4)
    PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (Direct in RAMDrive)
    I rendered the same sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder directly in my RamDrive
    Comment/Question : Look at the transfert rate under (picture 5).  It's exactly the same speed than with my RAID 0 LSI controller.  Impossible !  Look in the same picture the transfert rate I can reach with the ramdrive (> 3.0 Gb/sec steady) and I don't go under 30% of disk usage.  CPU is idle (70%), Disk is idle (100%), GPU is idle (100%) and RAM is free (63%).  // This kind of results let me REALLY confused.  It's smell bug and big problem with hardware and IO usage in CS6 !
    (picture 5)
    PPBM5 (MPEG-DVD) Result
    I rendered the sequence (MPEG-DVD) using Adobe Media Encoder.
    The result :
    My CPU is not used at 100%
    My Disk is totally idle !
    All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
    The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down).  Probably caused by (Encoding time....  write.... Encoding time.... write...)  // It's ok, ~2Mb/sec during transfert rate !  Real Joke !
    CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
    RAM, more than enough !  40 Go RAM free after the test !  // Excellent
    ~80 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Lot of thread, but it's ok in multi-thread apps!)
    GPU Load on card = 100 (This use the maximum of my GPU)
    GPU Ram get 1Gb of RAM
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (70%), disks are free (98%), GPU is loaded (MAX), RAM is free (63%), my computer is pushed at limit during the encoding process for GPU only.  Now, for this kind of encoding, the speed limit is affected by the slower IO (Video Card GPU)
    Other : Quadro 6000 is slower than GTX 680 for this kind of encoding (~20 s slower than GTX).
    (picture 6)
    Encoding single clip FULL HD AVCHD to H.264 Result (Premiere Pro CS6)
    You can look the result in the picture.
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (55%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (90%), RAM is free (65%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process.  Why ????   Adobe Premiere seem to have some bug with thread management.  My hardware is idle !  I understand AVCHD can be very difficult to decode, but where is the waste ?  My computer want, but the software not !
    (picture 7)
    Render composition using 3D Raytracer in After Effects CS6
    You can look the result in the picture.
    Comment : GPU seems to be the bottle neck when using After Effects.  CPU is free (99%), Disks are free (98%), Memory is free (60%) and it depend of the setting and type of project.
    Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result in time for rendering the composition.
    (picture 8)
    Conclusion
    There is nothing you can do (I thing) with CS6 to get better performance actually.  GTX 680 is the best (Consumer grade card) and the Quadro 6000 is the best (Profressional card).  Both of card give really similar result (I will probably return my GTX 680 since I not really get any better performance).  I not used Tesla card with my Quadro, but actually, both, Premiere Pro & After Effects doesn't use multi GPU.  I tried to used both card together (GTX & Quadro), but After Effects gives priority to the slower card (In this case, the GTX 680)
    Premiere Pro, I'm speechless !  Premiere Pro is not able to get max performance of my computer.  Not just 10% or 20%, but average 60%.  I'm a programmor, multi-threadling apps are difficult to manage and I can understand Adobe's programmor.  But actually, if anybody have comment about this post, tricks or any kind of solution, you can comment this post.  It's seem to be a bug...
    Thank you.

    Patrick,
    I can't explain everything, but let me give you some background as I understand it.
    The first issue is that CS6 has a far less efficient internal buffering or caching system than CS5/5.5. That is why the MPEG encoding in CS6 is roughly 2-3 times slower than the same test with CS5. There is some 'under-the-hood' processing going on that causes this significant performance loss.
    The second issue is that AME does not handle regular memory and inter-process memory very well. I have described this here: Latest News
    As to your test results, there are some other noteworthy things to mention. 3D Ray tracing in AE is not very good in using all CUDA cores. In fact it is lousy, it only uses very few cores and the threading is pretty bad and does not use the video card's capabilities effectively. Whether that is a driver issue with nVidia or an Adobe issue, I don't know, but whichever way you turn it, the end result is disappointing.
    The overhead AME carries in our tests is something we are looking into and the next test will only use direct export and no longer the AME queue, to avoid some of the problems you saw. That entails other problems for us, since we lose the capability to check encoding logs, but a solution is in the works.
    You see very low GPU usage during the H.264 test, since there are only very few accelerated parts in the timeline, in contrast to the MPEG2-DVD test, where there is rescaling going on and that is CUDA accelerated. The disk I/O test suffers from the problems mentioned above and is the reason that my own Disk I/O results are only 33 seconds with the current test, but when I extend the duration of that timeline to 3 hours, the direct export method gives me 22 seconds, although the amount of data to be written, 37,092 MB has increased threefold. An effective write speed of 1,686 MB/s.
    There are a number of performance issues with CS6 that Adobe is aware of, but whether they can be solved and in what time, I haven't the faintest idea.
    Just my $ 0.02

  • Performance Issue for BI system

    Hello,
    We are facing performance issues for BI System. Its a preproductive system and its performance is degrading badly everyday. I was checking system came to know program buffer hit ratio is increaasing everyday due to high Swaps. So asked to change the parameter abap/buffersize which was 300Mb to 500Mb. But still no major improvement is found in the system.
    There is 16GB Ram available and Server is HP-UX and with Netweaver2004s with Oracle 10.2.0.4.0 installed in it.
    The Main problem is while running a report or creating a query is taking way too long time.
    Kindly help me.

    Hello SIva,
    Thanks for your reply but i have checked ST02 and ST03 and also SM50 and its normal
    we are having 9 dialog processes, 3 Background , 2 Update and 1 spool.
    No one is using the system currently but in ST02 i can see the swaps are in red.
    Buffer                 HitRatio   % Alloc. KB  Freesp. KB   % Free Sp.   Dir. Size  FreeDirEnt   % Free Dir    Swaps    DB Accs
    Nametab (NTAB)                                                                                0
       Table definition     99,60     6.798                                                   20.000                                            29.532    153.221
       Field definition     99,82      31.562        784                 2,61           20.000      6.222          31,11          17.246     41.248
       Short NTAB           99,94     3.625      2.446                81,53          5.000        2.801          56,02             0            2.254
       Initial records      73,95        6.625        998                 16,63          5.000        690             13,80             40.069     49.528
                                                                                    0
    boldprogram                97,66     300.000     1.074                 0,38           75.000     67.177        89,57           219.665    725.703bold
    CUA                    99,75         3.000        875                   36,29          1.500      1.401          93,40            55.277      2.497
    Screen                 99,80         4.297      1.365                 33,35          2.000      1.811          90,55              119         3.214
    Calendar              100,00       488            361                  75,52            200         42              21,00               0            158
    OTR                   100,00         4.096      3.313                  100,00        2.000      2.000          100,00              0
                                                                                    0
    Tables                                                                                0
       Generic Key          99,17    29.297      1.450                  5,23           5.000        350             7,00             2.219      3.085.633
       Single record        99,43    10.000      1.907                  19,41           500         344            68,80              39          467.978
                                                                                    0
    Export/import          82,75     4.096         43                      1,30            2.000        662          33,10            137.208
    Exp./ Imp. SHM         89,83     4.096        438                    13,22         2.000      1.482          74,10               0    
    SAP Memory      Curr.Use %    CurUse[KB]    MaxUse[KB]    In Mem[KB]    OnDisk[KB]    SAPCurCach      HitRatio %
    Roll area               2,22                5.832               22.856             131.072     131.072                   IDs           96,61
    Page area              1,08              2.832                24.144               65.536    196.608              Statement     79,00
    Extended memory     22,90       958.464           1.929.216          4.186.112          0                                         0,00
    Heap memory                                    0                  0                    1.473.767          0                                         0,00
    Call Stati             HitRatio %     ABAP/4 Req      ABAP Fails     DBTotCalls         AvTime[ms]      DBRowsAff.
      Select single     88,59               63.073.369        5.817.659      4.322.263             0                         57.255.710
      Select               72,68               284.080.387          0               13.718.442             0                        32.199.124
      Insert                 0,00                  151.955             5.458             166.159               0                           323.725
      Update               0,00                    378.161           97.884           395.814               0                            486.880
      Delete                 0,00                    389.398          332.619          415.562              0                             244.495
    Edited by: Srikanth Sunkara on May 12, 2011 11:50 AM

  • RE: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte3M

    Hi James,
    Could you give me a call, I am at my desk.
    I had meetings all day and couldn't respond to your calls earlier.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: James Min [mailto:jminbrio.forte.com]
    Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:50 PM
    To: Sharma, Sandeep; Pyatetskiy, Alexander
    Cc: sophiaforte.com; kenlforte.com; Tenerelli, Mike
    Subject: Re: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte 3M
    Hello,
    I just want to reiterate that we are very committed to working on
    this issue, and that our goal is to find out the root of the problem. But
    first I'd like to narrow down the avenues by process of elimination.
    Open Cursor is something that is commonly used in today's RDBMS. I
    know that you must test your query in ISQL using some kind of execute
    immediate, but Sybase should be able to handle an open cursor. I was
    wondering if your Sybase expert commented on the fact that the server is
    not responding to commonly used command like 'open cursor'. According to
    our developer, we are merely following the API from Sybase, and open cursor
    is not something that particularly slows down a query for several minutes
    (except maybe the very first time). The logs show that Forte is waiting for
    a status from the DB server. Actually, using prepared statements and open
    cursor ends up being more efficient in the long run.
    Some questions:
    1) Have you tried to do a prepared statement with open cursor in your ISQL
    session? If so, did it have the same slowness?
    2) How big is the table you are querying? How many rows are there? How many
    are returned?
    3) When there is a hang in Forte, is there disk-spinning or CPU usage in
    the database server side? On the Forte side? Absolutely no activity at all?
    We actually have a Sybase set-up here, and if you wish, we could test out
    your database and Forte PEX here. Since your queries seems to be running
    off of only one table, this might be the best option, as we could look at
    everything here, in house. To do this:
    a) BCP out the data into a flat file. (character format to make it portable)
    b) we need a script to create the table and indexes.
    c) the Forte PEX file of the app to test this out.
    d) the SQL staement that you issue in ISQL for comparison.
    If the situation warrants, we can give a concrete example of
    possible errors/bugs to a developer. Dial-in is still an option, but to be
    able to look at the TOOL code, database setup, etc. without the limitations
    of dial-up may be faster and more efficient. Please let me know if you can
    provide this, as well as the answers to the above questions, or if you have
    any questions.
    Regards,
    At 08:05 AM 3/30/00 -0500, Sharma, Sandeep wrote:
    James, Ken:
    FYI, see attached response from our Sybase expert, Dani Sasmita. She has
    already tried what you suggested and results are enclosed.
    ++
    Sandeep
    -----Original Message-----
    From: SASMITA, DANIAR
    Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 6:43 PM
    To: Pyatetskiy, Alexander
    Cc: Sharma, Sandeep; Tenerelli, Mike
    Subject: Re: FW: Case 59063: Select using LIKE has performance
    issues
    w/ CTLIB and Forte 3M
    We did that trick already.
    When it is hanging, I can see what is doing.
    It is doing OPEN CURSOR. But not clear the exact statement of the cursor
    it is trying to open.
    When we run the query directly to Sybase, not using Forte, it is clearly
    not opening any cursor.
    And running it directly to Sybase many times, the response is always
    consistently fast.
    It is just when the query runs from Forte to Sybase, it opens a cursor.
    But again, in the Forte code, Alex is not using any cursor.
    In trying to capture the query,we even tried to audit any statementcoming
    to Sybase. Same thing, just open cursor. No cursor declaration anywhere.==============================================
    James Min
    Technical Support Engineer - Forte Tools
    Sun Microsystems, Inc.
    1800 Harrison St., 17th Fl.
    Oakland, CA 94612
    james.minsun.com
    510.869.2056
    ==============================================
    Support Hotline: 510-451-5400
    CUSTOMERS open a NEW CASE with Technical Support:
    http://www.forte.com/support/case_entry.html
    CUSTOMERS view your cases and enter follow-up transactions:
    http://www.forte.com/support/view_calls.html

    Earthlink wrote:
    Contrary to my understanding, the <font face="courier">with_pipeline</font> procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy <font face="courier">no_pipeline</font> procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
    Like:
    - a database version
    - how did you test
    - what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
    and so on.
    If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
    All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
    HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
    Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
    http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701

  • Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?

    Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?

    Thanks Kelly,
    The answers would be the following:
    1200 cells per custom section (NEW COUNT), and up to 30 custom sections per spec.
    Assuming all will be populated, and this would apply to all final material specs in the system which could be ~25% of all material specs.
    The cells will be numeric, free text, drop downs, and some calculated numeric.
    Are we reaching the limits for UI performance?
    Thanks

  • IOS 8.1+ Performance Issue

    Hello,
    I encountered a serious performance bug in Adobe Air iOS application on devices running iOS 8.1 or later. Approximately in 1-2 minutes fps drops to 7 or lower without interacting with the app. This is very noticeable in the app. The app looks like frozen for about 0.5 seconds. The bug doesn't appear on every session.
    Devices tested: iPad Mini iOS 8.1.1, iPhone 6 iOS 8.2. iPod Touch 4 iOS 6 is working correctly.
    Air SDK versions: 15 and 17 tested.
    I can track the bug using Adobe Scout. There is a noticeable spike on frame time 1.16. Framerate drops to 7.0. The App spends much time on function Runtime overhead. Sometimes the top activity is Running AS3 attached to frame or Waiting For Next Frame instead of Runtime overhead.
    The bug can be reproduced on an empty application having a one bitmap on stage. Open the app and wait for two minutes and the bug should appear. If not, just close and relaunch the app.
    Bugbase link: Bug#3965160 - iOS 8.1+ Performance Issue
    Miska Savela

    Hi
    Id already activated Messages and entered the 6 digit code I was presented with into my iPhone. I can receive txt messages from non iOS users on my iMac and can reply to those messages.
    I just can't send a new message from scratch to a non iOS user :-s
    Thanks
    Baz

  • Returning multiple values from a called tabular form(performance issue)

    I hope someone can help with this.
    I have a form that calls another form to display a multiple column tabular list of values(needs to allow for user sorting so could not use a LOV).
    The user selects one or more records from the list by using check boxes. In order to detect the records selected I loop through the block looking for boxes checked off and return those records to the calling form via a PL/SQL table.
    The form displaying the tabular list loads quickly(about 5000 records in the base table). However when I select one or more values from the table and return back to the calling form, it takes a while(about 3-4 minutes) to return to the called form with the selected values.
    I guess it is going through the block(all 5000 records) looking for boxes checked off and that is what is causing the noticeable pause.
    Is this normal given the data volumes I have or are there any other perhaps better techniques or tricks I could use to improve performance. I am using Forms6i.
    Sorry for being so long-winded and thanks in advance for any help.

    Try writing to your PL/SQL table when the user selects (or remove when deselect) by usuing a when-checkbox-changed trigger. This will eliminate the need for you top loop through a block with 5000 records and should improve your performance.
    I am not aware of any performance issues with PL/SQL tables in forms, but if you still have slow performance try using a shared record-group instead. I have used these in the past for exactly the same thing and had no performance problems.
    Hope this helps,
    Candace Stover
    Forms Product Management

  • Performance issues with class loader on Windows server

    We are observing some performance issues in our application. We are Using weblogic 11g with Java6 on a windows 2003 server
    The thread dumps indicate many threads are waiting in queue for the native file methods:
    "[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '106' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'" RUNNABLE
         java.io.WinNTFileSystem.getBooleanAttributes(Native Method)
         java.io.File.exists(Unknown Source)
         weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getFileSource(ClasspathClassFinder.java:398)
         weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getSourcesInternal(ClasspathClassFinder.java:347)
         weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getSource(ClasspathClassFinder.java:316)
         weblogic.application.io.ManifestFinder.getSource(ManifestFinder.java:75)
         weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
         weblogic.application.utils.CompositeWebAppFinder.getSource(CompositeWebAppFinder.java:71)
         weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
         weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
         weblogic.utils.classloaders.CodeGenClassFinder.getSource(CodeGenClassFinder.java:33)
         weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findResource(GenericClassLoader.java:210)
         weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.getResourceInternal(GenericClassLoader.java:160)
         weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.getResource(GenericClassLoader.java:182)
         java.lang.ClassLoader.getResourceAsStream(Unknown Source)
         javax.xml.parsers.SecuritySupport$4.run(Unknown Source)
         java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
         javax.xml.parsers.SecuritySupport.getResourceAsStream(Unknown Source)
         javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.findJarServiceProvider(Unknown Source)
         javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.find(Unknown Source)
         javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(Unknown Source)
         org.ajax4jsf.context.ResponseWriterContentHandler.<init>(ResponseWriterContentHandler.java:48)
         org.ajax4jsf.context.ViewResources$HeadResponseWriter.<init>(ViewResources.java:259)
         org.ajax4jsf.context.ViewResources.processHeadResources(ViewResources.java:445)
         org.ajax4jsf.application.AjaxViewHandler.renderView(AjaxViewHandler.java:193)
         org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.RenderResponseExecutor.execute(RenderResponseExecutor.java:41)
         org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:140)
    On googling this seems to be an issue with java file handling on windows servers and I couldn't find a solution yet. Any recommendation or pointer is appreciated

    Hi shubhu,
    I just analyzed your partial Thread Dump data, the problem is that the ajax4jsf framework ResponseWriterContentHandler triggers internally a new instance of the DocumentBuilderFactory; every time; triggering heavy IO contention because of Class loader / JAR file search operations.
    Too many of these IO operations under heavy load will create excessive contention and severe performance degradation; regardless of the OS you are running your JVM on.
    Please review the link below and see if this is related to your problem.. This is a known issue in JBOSS JIRA when using RichFaces / ajaxJSF.
    https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-6166
    Regards,
    P-H
    http://javaeesupportpatterns.blogspot.com/

  • Performance issues with flashed 7800GT (G5)

    Hey,
    I recently flashed a PC 7800GT with the 128K OEM NVidia ROM. It's one of the cards with a physical 128K ROM chip, so no worries there. However, it doesn't deliver the performance I expected. I have a Late 2005 2.0 DC, 10GB DDR2 and use Leopard 10.5.8.
    This is what OS X puts out (german):
    NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT:
      Chipsatz-Modell:    GeForce 7800GT
      Typ:    Monitor
      Bus:    PCIe
      Steckplatz:    SLOT-1
      PCIe-Lane-Breite:    x16
      VRAM (gesamt):    256 MB
      Hersteller:    NVIDIA (0x10de)
      Geräte-ID:    0x0092
      Versions-ID:    0x00a1
      ROM-Version:    2152.2
    Performance issues are: I can't seem to reach frame rates that are anywhere near the results provided by barefeats. Quake 3 runs with approx 200fps in 1600x1200x32 (I expected 300+ fps), Quake 4 and UT2004 run okay, but not on high settings with high resolutions. So, not equivalent to what you wouldd expect from the system's specs) Same goes for Colin McRae Rallye. Now, I remember reading about performance issues in 10.5.8 with the flashed ROM since it doesn't seem to be a 1:1 copy of the original one. I didn't try it in Tiger since I don't exactly want to go back from Leopard. Am I right that this is probably an issue of the "OEM ROM" (from the macelite)? Does anyone have the real deal in terms of 7800GT ROMs and could provide me with a link?
    Br

    Hi-
    If you send me an email via my website, I can send you a couple of ROMs that might work better.
    http://www.jcsenterprises.com/Japamacs_Page/All_Things_PPC.html
    Problem with the flashed 256 MB GT, though, is that Leopard runs slow.
    Bad driver interaction.....
    The 512 MB GTX is the way to go........

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I use an iTunes credit (from a gift  card which has been entered) for a book burchase?

    I have entered a $25 gift card and would like to use it for a book purchase. When I ordered a book it was charged to my credit card not the iTunes credit.

  • Migrate MS SQL Server data to Oracle

    Hi, We need to move our data from SQL Server to Oracle, the thing is that we already have db schema for SQL Server and Oracle, so there is no need to migrate the schema(Actually our application relies on the existing schema, we don't want to change t

  • J2ee RI doesn't understand client identity

    Hi all, I wrote a client application that try to use an EJB session bean deployed in J2EE RI App.Server. I specified the following data to connect to the server: Properties p = new Properties(); p.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, "com.sun.jndi. .

  • E_ADEPT_NO_FULFILLMENT_RESULT

    I am trying to download my book .acsm and convert to .epub for reading in a kobo ereader When I drag the file .acsm to ADE, I get this error  E_ADEPT_NO_FULFILLMENT_RESULT   Error getting license Please help! I'm from Spain

  • Palm Pre continually dropping connection on Sprint

    Summary: Continually cycling between great connection and no service. I am in what I would suspect is a dense coverage area, and according to Sprint it is, in the Seattle area.  I bought a pre this morning, and have watched it continue to bop between