Weird filename are getting created in archive directory.

Hi All,
Weird filename are getting created in archive directory.
I have one ftp adapter,after the file getting processed the file's are getting moved to archive directory.
But with some different file name/ filename are randomly generated. But the content of the file remains the same.
Pls suggest.
Thanks.

This is standard functionality, it uses the original filename with a suffix of the datetime.
cheers
James

Similar Messages

DefaultTrace. x .trc are getting creating around 6 for minute

Hi Gurus,
In one of our production system at \j2ee\cluster\server0\log\defaultTrace.<x>.trc these traces files are getting generated around 6 for every minute with 10 MB each. Not sure why these many are getting created and everytime 10 MB each?
Please help me with some fix
Thanks in adavance
Regards
Sekhar

Old logs are compressed (zipped up) to save disk space. By default, logs are written to a maximum of five files with 10MB capacity of each file. Thus, when this set of five files are full, it will rotate back to the first file and start overwriting the old logs. Before overwriting the old logs, the Log Configurator service backs up the five files into a zip file. So, each zip file contains a set of five log files. The logs within these zip files are called archive logs

Empty files are getting created at receiver FTP server

Hi Experts,
I have an Idoc to File scenario where I am sending an XML file to receiver FTP server.
Scenario is working fine but sometimes an empty file is getting generated at receiver FTP server.
I have already selected ignore empty file at receiver channel so issue is not within PI system configuration.
When I checked the message log I can see that almost all the files are getting created successfully without any issues, but
for some files/messages I can see that there are below error logs.
"Transmitting the message to endpoint <local> using connection IDoc_AAE_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Could not get FTP connection from connection pool (1 connections) within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the number of available connections"
"Exception caught by adapter framework: Could not get FTP connection from connection pool (1 connections) within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the number of available connections."
And after there is again success message log in the same message and it creating a file successfully during that time stamp.
but the third party is sometime receiving empty file which I am not able to find in any trace or log (my file name is SD_timestamp.xml).
Can you please let me know what is the solution and what adjustments FTP server need to do in order to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rahul Kulkarni

The error you are getting that says "Could not get FTP connection from connection pool (1 connections) within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the number of available connections" has probably nothing to do with the empty files problem.
I second Hareesh Gampa that you first should try "temporary file creation". You might also need to tell the FTP owner that he should only pick up files with that are written completely and that do comply with a negotiated file name schema. The temp file should have another schema of course then. He should not pick up just every file that is written. See here for details
http://help.sap.de/saphelp_nw74/helpdata/en/44/6830e67f2a6d12e10000000a1553f6/content.htm
HTH
Cheers
Jens

EREC: Multipal IDOC are getting created in receiver system for one IDOC

Hello Experts,
I ran in to one wearied issue in IDOC creation in Receiver system. I am running PFAL in sender system for only Person but 10 IDOC are getting created in receiver system. I don't know why is this happening.
This issue started popping up after we ran RBDAPP01-Inbound Processing of IDocs Ready for Transfer. We ran this to change IDOC to 53 status. Now I don't know what went wrong but Perner distribution is behaving
Appreciate your help.
Regards,
Krishna Bidwai
Losangeles USA.
818 527 0204.

Yes, employee is getting created after adding 0003 into the filter, but can u please answer my another question, i.e. PERNR in sender and receiver system should be same.
So in Receiver system (ECC) do i need to maintain external number range for PERNR?
Thanks

Why 2BDOCS are getting created for sending Sold to Party to ECC.

Hi,
I have a question, when BP (Sold to) gets create in CRM & replicates in successfully ECC.When I see Tran SMW01, I found two bdocs are getting created for same Sold to. Why this is happening!! How I can remove the another Bdoc type (VEND_MAIN).
Please suggest.

Hello Developer,
Yes, I've checked the combinations of webshop(In Shopadmin) and Product Catalog.(Sales Area)
All of them are compatible.
Hey DJ,
When you say: u201Cthe first entry maintained in the USAPPLREF tableu201Du2026.in our case, there are 2 entries for my user (PPELA3). The first one is for object type BUS1006001 and object key nr° 23263-my contact person, linked to sold-to nr° 1000003), which is the employee that I 've created in the ISAUSERADMIN.
The second entry is with object type KNA1 with object key nr° 1000003 (which is the sold-to).
Those are the only entries for my user in this table.
Does this sequence have the influence described by you? Is that what you want to say?
Other point: Does the REFERENCE CUSTOMER is important for the B2B scenario? (Our case) Since I thought it was important just for B2C scenarios, It was the same number in SHOPADMIN Webshop creation.
In the meantime, I will create a new reference customer and change the webshop parameters.
Thanks for your inputs.
Regards,
Paulo Pela

Temporary tables are getting created, name starting with BIN$.....

Hi,
I am using Oracle 10.2 and am experiencing an issue that doing some operations on existing tables, some temporary tables are getting created starting with BIN$.
For ex: BIN$HULdSlmnRZmbCXAl/pkA9w==$0
But I dont see these tables in the database after two or three days. I found that these temporary tables are a replica of existing tables and these contain only the table structure but not the data. I even not able to drop them from database.
Can anyone throw some pointers on this?
Thanks and Regards,
Siva

These tables are in the Oracle recycle bin. When you drop a table, Oracle just renames it to BIN$xxx so that you can undrop the table if you made a mistake.
- You can ignore tables in the recycle bin if you would like. Oracle will automatically purge them when it needs the space.
- You can prevent a table from going in to the recycle bin by adding the purge command to the drop, i.e.
DROP TABLE table_name PURGE- You can empty out the recycle bin using the command
SQL> purge dba_recyclebin(or just recyclebin if you only want to clear out the objects you own from the recyclebin).
Justin

How the ASN in or out messages are getting created whenever there is any action performed related to these messages.

Hi ,
Can any one please let me know with an example like,
I have receive the ASNin message in SIM and then ASNOUT will get created and flowes to RMS.
How these ASNin or out messages are getting created.

Hi Keith,
You stated that "I think Geoff's showing remarkable tolerance by not just deleting the whole thread." Are we in the third world countries that there are no freedom of speech?!!!
I appreciate your help.
Some of you mentioned that I don't know how to use it. I have a question for you where did you learn how to use Lightroom? I learned the same way everyone learns. Study the subjects by reading books, videos, taking classes and enroll in some kind of training. I am following all the instructions that I can my hand on. I wish that instead of accusing me of not knowing have a different view of the issue. What if there is a bug in the program? Some of you were and are very successful and that does not mean that the program does not have some issues. We all use the program differently, and with these differences ways in using it some problems will come out for some and not for others.
I am not promoting one program over the other, and I am not putting Lightroom down. I am just expressing how I feel. Put yourself in my shoes and spent just hours creating some renaming templates and suddenly you find out that it is not there anymore and all your efforts are gone with the wind. I then go and search through the internet to find out what did I do wrong and how to solve it. I find out that I am not alone, and there others that still waiting for the solution to come.
Let be open and do not hush people, and when you do that it will be the end of any progress or improvement on how everything is.
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to all of you. You are all supportive and very helpful.
Thank you and have a very Happy New Year.
Mo

Junk transactions are getting created in WF_ITEMS

Hi,
We have a severe problem, hundreds of junk transactions are getting created in wf_items table daily (for same item_type and same root_activity). For all of these transactions the 'owner_role' is same and these are left active (end_date is null). These transactions are not having either Parent or Child records. Due to these transactions performance is getting impacted. Please help us in finding the root of these transactions.
Thanks a lot in advance,
Ramu
Edited by: Ramu G on Dec 29, 2010 7:54 PM

Hi Srini,
OS: Linux 2.6.18-128.4.1.0.1.el5PAE
DB: Oracle DB 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
EBS version: R12.1.3
I could see these junk transactions since 2003 but from 2009 onwards these were getting created in huge amount. 2003 to 2008 total number of transactions are < 10000, but in 2009 : 340000 and in 2010 (till today) 470000.
one sample record:
Item Type: HRSSA
Item Key: 9727158
Root Activity: ORA_GEN_MAINT_PERINFO_V5_PRC
Root Activity Version: 39
Owner Role: [email protected]
Parent Item TYpe: NULL
Parent Item Key: NULL
Parent Context: NULL
Begin Date: 16-Oct-2010
End Date: NULL
User Key: Personal Information V5.0
HA Migration Flag: NULL
Secuirty Group ID: NULL
I am not sure what was changed and which is causing this data.
Thank you,
Ramu

File not getting created in Target Directory..........

Hi All,
We are trying a IDOC-File scenario & trying to create a XML file on the receiver side........All the mappings have been checked & everything is working fine.It shows success in SXMB_MONI. But the file is not getting created at the target directory..... Checked the component Monitoring and message monitoring as well, which is also successful...
What could be the reason of such behaviour, and is there a way to track the where the target file is getting placed?
Please Help
Regards,
Jayashri

>
Jayashri Rade wrote:
> Hi All,
> We are trying a IDOC-File scenario & trying to create a XML file on the receiver side........All the mappings have been checked & everything is working fine.It shows success in SXMB_MONI. But the file is not getting created at the target directory..... Checked the component Monitoring and message monitoring as well, which is also successful...
i
Did you check the receiver communication channel in communication channel monitoring?
Are there any errors?

Goods Receipt is not completed but Outbound deliveries are getting create.

Hi,
I have a Cross Dock issue.
In cross dock scenario, after completing inbound process, outbound delivery needs to process.
in our case there is batch job running in the background, which is creating Outbound deliveries without completing the Inbound process.
This should not happen. Customer getting confused with this process,
process as follows:
SO-> PR-> PO-> Inbound delivery-> MIGO.
then we go to VL10C and create the Outbound delivery.
i check the availability check at delivery level, all setting are correct.
Please letme know what setting needs to be done for this, to restrict this process.
We need output like, 1st GR needs to be done , then using VL10C, outbound deliveries needs to create.
awating for your help.
Br,
Hari.

Hi...Krishna,
Can you explain the process for Inbound delivery creation.
Rgds

My Firewall is not letting me change permissions, and documents with .501 and .503 extensions are getting created related to Device Discovery and Image Capture!

I have good reason to believe my system has been compromised. Just a few minutes ago I went into the "System & Security" from the "Preferences" and I just happened to click on my firewall settings and in the window in which users can "allow" or "block" certain actions I saw a permission for screen sharing green and allowed, [shown in the picture below] and I tried many times to click on it and press the minus sign or change the permission from green to yellow or red and simply block it, but it appears to be frozen or locked and I cannot even select it. I'm on the administrator account so it's not a matter of user account. Clicking on it doesn't do anything. Having said that I can check and select the "Stealth Mode" and "Block All incoming Connections"... but why am I not able to select that Screen Sharing and what is it? [Image below]
I also spotted 2 strange looking docs created in my Library/Caches folder, file name: com.apple.ImageCaptureNotifications.DeviceDiscoveryDatabase.501 and com.apple.ImageCaptureNotifications.DeviceDiscoveryDatabase.503 [Image below]
In Finder, on the sidebar, next to the "Computer" icon under the devices, the title "Computer" itself has disappeared, and it's basicly blank and empty in front of the "Computer" Icon, it works and takes me to "Macintosh HD" when I click on it, but the writings have disappeared... [Image below]
Would anyone please tell me what this is all about? I'd really appreciate your help. Mac OS X 10.7.5 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7

I haven't been able to get my site posted up yet. Here is a link to it anyway:andrearosales.com
I will be working on connecting my files up to my server. At the moment, here are some screen shots of some messages that I am getting when I am saving my file.
I'm not sure what to make of these messages. I tried to put a new spry horizontal menu bar on my main page, and when it appeared, it displayed as a spry vertical menu bar.
Here is a picture of what it looks like:
I"m going to refer to the links that were suggested to me though. I'm not sure if pictures of the code will help to solve my problem. I'm going to try again to connect my files to my server though.

FTP Adaptert - Junk Filename is created in archive folder

Hi All,
Junk filename is getting created in archive directory.
I have one ftp adapter,after the file is getting processed the file's are getting moved to archive directory.
But with some different Junk file name suffiffed with timestamp/ filename are randomly generated. But the content of the file remains the same.
Pls suggest me as to how to retain the same file name while archiving.
Thanks & Regards
Nithya

Are you on 10.1.3.3, there is a bug 6414848 which encrypts the file name. There is a stand alone patch of the same name (6414848)
It is also part of 10.1.3.4, or any MLR patch greater than MLR#6 for 10.1.3.3
Depending on your project I would recommend upgrading to 10.1.3.4 and apply the latest MLR patch MLR#6 (8279781) if you apply the MLR patch make sure you apply the one off patch 8416391 as well as there is a know issue around memory.
If this is not possible I would apply the latest 10.1.3.3 MLR patch MLR#17 (7375080) if you apply the MLR patch make sure you apply the one off patch 8416391 as well as there is a know issue around memory.
If this in not possible then just apply the one off patch 6414848
cheers
James

Stange Files getting Created

I have recently noticed that I am getting strange files that I am not sure were they are coming from. The files when opened using VI show the text of MUTX and that is all they say. They are names starting with 0x, followed by a rather long string of Hexidecimal numbers.Example (0x6c6d48142) The files are getting placed directly in my main hard. The files are 44bytes in size but many many of them are getting created daily. I have found little to no articles explaing what may be related to MUTX,except it may be related to some type of "leak", I do not understand what that means. Has anyone seen this or this type of thing before? Thank you for your help

AnkitV wrote:
Hi
I am facing the below peculiar problem.
Our prod database D1 is installed on host H1 and PL/SQL jobs run on server S1 accessing D1 and create files on S1 only.
Recently I got same jobs scheduled to run on S2 accessing D2 database (test) installed on H2 serve,r but files are getting created on H2 instead of S2.
Directory object is EXTERNAL_TABLE_DIR on both S1 and S2.
Actually files should be created on S2 only as jobs are being run there only.
Can you please tell why are the files getting created on H2 given that jobs are run from S2 and what can be done to rectify this ?
Thanks a lotHi,
The job will be created the file only on the server where the database is installed not in any other server.

OraInstall timestamp folder gets created daily at /tmp + GridControl.

i have a environment with oracle 11g grid control and in few servers exactly at midnight everyday orainstall<TimeStamp> directories are getting created. So i think daily there is some kind of silent install getting triggered.
so i have checked deployment and deployment procedures in grid control, and could not find anything related to this.
i checked database level jobs, nothing here as well,
i check crontab, nothing here as well,
just for a day i stopped the oracle agent and did not see the orainstall getting kicked at midnight, so atleast i can rule out the operating system part.
this is how the folder looks like
host1:agent (1006) $ cd OraInstall2012-05-20_12-00-15AM
host1:agent (1007) $ ls
AttachHome2012-05-20_12-00-15AM.log jre
OPatch oui
command_output_9019432
and there is a silentInstall.log in /tmp
host1:agent (1012) $ more silentInstall.log
silentInstall.log
OUI-10198:Unable to create a new Oracle Home with name OracleHome1. An Oracle Home with this name al
ready exists. Please select another name.
Can anybody here show me some directions to find what is really happening ?

Hit with Bug Bug 11864343
Refer:
EVERY NIGHT AGENT IS CREATING A DIRECTORY ORAINSTALL<TIMESTAMP> UNDER /TMP [ID 1342547.1]

Line Items are getting rejected in Sales Orders

Hi,
I am creating sales orders using ORDERS Message type and for this I am using the Standard SAP Inbound Function Module to create sales orders.
Idocs are getting processed successfully and sales orders are getting created, but line items in the sales order are getting rejected and hey are getting rejected with reason for rejection to be <b> No Availability Lost</b>.
So, I would like to know if this is a problem with the data furnished in the Idoc or else any custom setting have to be maintained or not?
Raghuram

The reason why they are failing is because in the user exit as per the logic present here whenever a EDI Order with customer Purchaser Order Type DFUE is to be processed ABGRU (Reason for Rejection) has been flagged equal to 01 and hence order item lines are having rejection reason.

Weird filename are getting created in archive directory.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for