Weird Hardware issue, NOT OS related.

My Macbook randomly will slow down, and the screen will lose bit depth (Extremely bizarre) and will gradually turn white. This happens in BOTH Windows and OS X, so NO, it isn't Windows, and nor is it a virus, before anyone suggests that. This is a hardware issue, anyone have an idea of what's wrong? It doesn't seem to be overheating, since the Macbook isn't particularly hot.
If this is unsolvable, anyone think there'll be a chance for refund/replacement? I'm within 1 year warranty time, and this is just bizarre.

The demonstrating thing will be difficult, to say the least. It is, like I said, fairly random, and isn't limited to when I'm doing a task or anything. It seems to happen in Windows a bit more often, though it was first noticed while in OS X, and it happening more in Windows is easily explained simply by the fact that I use Windows more (Sorry, I'm computer literate, so Windows can accomplish SOOO much more).

Similar Messages

  • HT4623 I cannot hear the sound when i am calling from phone but i could hear when i cal from Skype or Gtalk...I guess its not an hardware issue and is related to software. please help me fix this..

    nee your help and the subject issue

    Did you reset your phone? First thing to try is to reset your device. Press and hold the Home and Sleep buttons simultaneously ignoring the red slider should one appear until the Apple logo appears. Let go of the buttons and let the device restart. See if that fixes your problem.

  • Weird Hardware Issues - Need Your Advice

    Hello.
    I'm having this weird issue lately, and I was wondering if anyone can help.
    First, I have a Pentium 4 3.2Ghz HT Presscot CPU, 512 MB RAM and an nVidia GeForce FX5200.
    The problem:
    I often leave my machine on overnight. When I wake up and get to the machine, I can see that X is using 50% CPU. When I move the mouse, I can see that it reacts very slowly to mouse-over effects. Then when I click a window, or try to access the keyboard, X pretty much freezes, and it loses touch with both the mouse and the keyboard. The only resort is to press the Reset button.
    When I do so, my machine does not really reset - It gets stuck even before the BIOS screen comes up.
    What I do then is I need to shutdown the computer, wait for a few minutes and turn it back on. When I turn it back on and it actually start working, I get a message from my BIOS, stating that some "overclocking failed". It then asks me to either load the default BIOS settings or to reconfigure the BIOS myself. When I choose the load the default settings, it carries on to GRUB and it's all good.
    The cause (what I think, that is):
    I think the cause for this is the CPU. My CPU runs at very high temperatures, for some reason. Now my computer is idle, and according to lm_sensors it runs at 68C now. When I came to the machine this morning, lm_sensors showed it was running at 81C.
    The thing is I am pretty clueless as far as hardware is concerned. Can that be the reason for it all? What causes X to suddenly go berzerk with its CPU usage?
    Any ideas and suggestions would be welcome, as I am pretty clueless.
    Thanks a lot for reading

    run "ps aux" command will tell you everything that is running
    also
    open the case make sure all fans are spinning
    clean all dust & pet hair if you have a pet
    i dont have a pet but i do clean the inside of my box like once a year or more
    remove fan housing from heatsink on processor clean all dust between fins
    if you dont have one or do consider putting another case fan in there
    at one end machine blowing out the other end blowing in to circulate frsh air into box
    does your pc sit inside a cabinet? maybe a wood desk cabinet, wood absorbs heat
    while the inside of your pc circultes air if inside a cabinet with the same air trapped inside
    the pc is only circulating the same air this is only one possibility for your issues but its the 1st place id look
    for heat issues
    & from what your telling me
    81 degree Celsius = 177.8 degree Fahrenheit
    i think 212 degrees is boiling , you could damn near cook your meals in a machine that hot
    i leave my pc on almost always i have not turned it off in some time & im running
    30 degree Celsius = 86 degree Fahrenheit

  • Wireless keyboard caps lock issue (not LED related)

    i just bought an iMac last week and I'm having a weird issue with caps locks. It seems like that particular key needs to be pressed harder than the rest of the keys to register a keystroke. If I hit it lightly, the key will depress but the keystroke won't register and the LED light won't come on. Any other key, even if I hit it very lightly, as long as it was pressed down, the keystroke is registered,
    I found the right amount of force where I can press it down like 10 times and it won't register the keystrokes at all. When I'm typing fast, I'll have to go back to capitalize almost 80% of the letter that need capitalizing even though I hit the caps lock key while I was typing. All the "I"s, the first letters of every sentence and the first letters of proper names.
    I've had plenty of keyboards, some wireless and I've never had this issue, nor have I had it on my Macbook. I'm just wondering if this is how it was designed to work or if I have a faulty keyboard that I need to go and replace.

    Hi Guys
    Glad I've just found these posts. Got a new 27" iMac just before Christmas. Greatly relieved that everything worked despite all the reports of cracked screens, etc. BUT - only small problem was the Caps Lock light not always coming on. Rang Apple and got a replacement. Now today I'm having same problems - first the light froze and wouldn't go off. Then it wouldn't come on. I've now tried your advice of switching off the keyboard and taking out the batteries. Works OK now. Hopefuly it'll stay that way. Only thing is - pity Apple couldn't have given me that advice. Reading these posts, there is clearly an ongoing problem with the caps lock light on the wireless keyboard. A problem thats been around for months. Clearly Apple's poilicy, as always, is to admit nothing until it comes up with a fix. Pity that policy appears to extend to not even telling their own employees that there is a problem ...

  • Aspect ratio issue not letterbox related

    i am running all video thru my receiver. my appletv outputs to my plasma TV w/black bars on either side of the picture. it appears it is output at 4:3 and not 16:9. i don't have this issue w/any of the other video inputs (dvd, cable tv). i don't see this as a tv or receiver issue/ can anyone offer any suggestions on fixing this? is there an output ratio adjust in apple tv?

    The content you are watching sounds like it is not widescreen but 4:3 format.
    When this is sent to the TV from the Apple TV via the HDMI cable it is shown on the TV in the aspect ratio that it was made. What you maybe able to do is make the TV stretch the signal to fill the full screen as it is doing when you use the VGA connections The issue here is that some TV's do not allow the TV signal to be stretched when fed via the HDMI port. It is not an issue with the Apple TV, it is outputting the signal correctly. See if you can adjust the TV to stretch the content to full screen.

  • [SOLVED] Weird keyboard mapping issue (not hardware)

    Hi all,
    I'm not a fan of posting in forums, as i usually always find my solution on other topics or fix it myself after hard work. But this time i must admit, this goes beyond my competence (although i'm pretty sure it's a stupid thing i havent thought of lol)
    Alright, here it is. After a power failure, i had to reboot... but i had made some nvidia ( -> 195.36) and kernel ( -> 2.6.34) upgrades meanwhile, and i couldn't boot anymore. I fixed that by downgrading, then X didn't want to start so i did the same on nvidia.
    Since then, my keyboard layout is messed up. My right alt key behaves as the left arrow (although the left arrow still fonctions well). The down arrow generates down keypress as usual, but followed by a "enter". For example, here is the result of xev after pressing the alt key:
    KeyRelease event, serial 46, synthetic NO, window 0x2000001,
        root 0x142, subw 0x0, time 133186949, (-682,-202), root:(398,157),
        state 0x0, keycode 113 (keysym 0xff51, Left), same_screen YES,
        XLookupString gives 0 bytes:
    I tried "kdb" and "Keyboard" in xorg.conf, both giving the same result. This is "not too bad", except that i'm a programmer, so i need my brackets lol I can do alt+bracket key... it works, but it generates a left arrow first, so it's kind of a waste of time.
    The keyboard is not at fault, it works perfectly on my laptop (both on windows and ubuntu that are on my laptop... yuck lol). I even got a new keyboard yesterday (thanks to my boss stepping on the other one), and it has the exact same behavior... so i doubt it's hardware issue.
    Well, that's my situation... and i gave up lol don't know what else to test, so i hoped some1 else would come up with some genius idea.
    Thanks in advance!
    Jni
    PS: sorry for my english hehe
    Last edited by jni (2010-07-31 16:57:21)

    I used to have Xorg-1.8 but i had to downgrade along with nvidia, due to nvidia 190 requiring xorg < 1.8 :
    X.Org X Server 1.7.6
    Release Date: 2010-03-17
    X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
    Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.33-ARCH x86_64
    Current Operating System: Linux jni-desktop 2.6.32-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Feb 23 19:43:46 CET 2010 x86_64
    Kernel command line: root=/dev/disk/by-uuid/96581f3f-9a53-476e-b0e7-9ca2b047f361 ro rootdelay=50 rootfstype=reiserfs
    Build Date: 01 April 2010  05:28:33PM
    Current version of pixman: 0.18.2
        Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
        to make sure that you have the latest version.
    So i never really had time to see if keyboard with 1.8 was working, nvidia wudnt start and i found on forum that i had to downgrade it for now, error with the new .34 kernel.
    xf86-input-evdev is installed, but i cannot find it's config file. I don't have a xorg.conf.d directory, all i have is a xorg.conf. Here is my xorg.conf, if that can be of any use...
    # nvidia-xconfig: X configuration file generated by nvidia-xconfig
    # nvidia-xconfig:  version 1.0  (buildmeister@builder58)  Wed Dec  9 16:34:26 PST 2009
    # nvidia-settings: X configuration file generated by nvidia-settings
    # nvidia-settings:  version 1.0  (buildmeister@builder58)  Wed Dec  9 16:35:48 PST 2009
    Section "ServerLayout"
        Identifier     "Layout0"
        Screen      0  "Screen0" 0 0
        InputDevice    "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
        InputDevice    "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
        Option         "Xinerama" "0"
        Option         "AllowEmptyInput" "false"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
        Load           "evdev"
        Load           "glx"
    EndSection
    Section "ServerFlags"
        Option         "Xinerama" "0"
        Option         "AllowEmptyInput" "off"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
        # generated from default
        Identifier     "Mouse0"
        Driver         "mouse"
        Option         "Protocol" "auto"
        Option         "Device" "/dev/psaux"
        Option         "Emulate3Buttons" "no"
        Option         "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
        # generated from default
        Identifier     "Keyboard0"
        Driver         "kbd"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
        Identifier     "Monitor0"
        VendorName     "Unknown"
        ModelName      "LG W2053"
        HorizSync       30.0 - 83.0
        VertRefresh     56.0 - 75.0
        Option         "DPMS"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
        Identifier     "Device0"
        Driver         "nvidia"
        VendorName     "NVIDIA Corporation"
        BoardName      "GeForce 9500 GT"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
        Identifier     "Screen0"
        Device         "Device0"
        Monitor        "Monitor0"
        DefaultDepth    24
        Option         "TwinViewXineramaInfoOrder" "CRT-0"
        Option         "TwinView" "0"
        Option         "metamodes" "1600x900 +0+0"
        SubSection     "Display"
            Depth       24
        EndSubSection
    EndSection
    (very sorry for the lack of bbcode on this... but remember, my alt key is broken lol)

  • Hi, I got an Error 23 when trying to restore my phone. Apple support centre says its a hardware issue without doing anything to come to this conclusion. They will not tell me how to escalate this case. Please let me know if there is a way to escalate.

    One day when tried to restart my iphone 4, I got a screen asking me to connect to itunes. Itunes asked me to restore my phone. When I tried to restore, I got an Error 23 saying it cannot be restored. I tried the phone support. They asked to contact the service centre. I then tried the service centre guys. They clearly did not know what Error 23 was. They asked to contact the apple support again. After 2-3 guys tried to blow me off saying it is a hardware issue, I asked for a senior analyst. Apple support assigned a senior guy who said he will contact the engineering team. After 2 days, I was told that the engineering team has confirmed that this is a hardware issue.
    What I am surprised about is that no one seems to have done any analysis or debugging to figure this out. How do they decide that this is a hardware issue?
    The first time I tried it from my laptop and got this message. The support guy told me that my laptop may have an antivirus software which may be causing this issue. So I took it to the service centre. They tried the same restore from their machine and got the exact same error.
    The senior analyst that was later assigned to my case, again asked me to restore from my machine. I got the same error.
    Basically what they had verified in all these activities was that I was getting error 23. I dont know how they decided that this was due to hardware issues?
    Online documentation on Error 23 is vague. It is bunched long with other error codes. There is no clear explanation of what Error 23 is.
    But most importantly It says 'In rare cases, this may be a hardware issue'.
    So if it is a hardware issue in rare case, how was my case deemed to be a 'rare case'?
    When I asked them to escalate this, they said that there is no way to escalate.
    I have had a horrible experience with Apple support. Till this point I used to think of Apple as a class apart. But now I am totally disillusioned.
    My phone was about a year and a half old. I dont mind it if it actually turns out to be a hardware issue. I will take it as my bad luck.
    But I dont see how the support guys decided that this is a hardware issue. I need to know.
    And secondly I am shocked that Apple has no escalation path.
    Can anyone please help?

    Hi @imobl,
    You sound like an Apple support guy who hasn't been able to answer my questions.
    To respond to some of the points you made,
    - I did not ignore Ocean20's suggestion. If you has read my post, you would have known that I took my phone to the apple service centre where they tried this restore on THEIR machines. I am assuming that Apple guys know how not to block iTunes. So I actually do not understand your point about me trying the hosts file changes on my machine. Do you not believe that apple tested this issue with the correct settings?
    - you also give a flawed logic of why the issue is a hardware issue. You mentioned that If I thought that the issue was with the software, i should try a restore and getting it to work. The problem is that my error (23), and many others comes up when the restore fails. And you would be astonished to know that not all errors are hardware errors. Sometimes even software errors prevent restores. Funnily enough Apple itself mention that 'in rare cases, error 23 could be hardware related'.
    - all Apple has done so far is replicate the issue. I don not know how anyone can conclude that the issue is a hardware issue.
    And by the way, I am not certain that this is a software bug. Again if you read my Posts, you will notice I only want a confirmation,/proof that the issue is hardware related as they mention..
    Please refrain do. Responding if there is nothing to add.

  • Yoga Pro 2 - Display not recognized in windows (Driver or Hardware issue?)

    Out of warranty by a month!
    Yoga Pro 2 - 256gb, installed new wireless card a month ago. Windows 8.1
    The touchscreen still works while the screen is black.
    System restarted after sleep mode I think.
    The Lenovo logo is displayed, seems to load windows, but when windows loads (I don't see it load so this is an assumption) the screen blanks and the black light is on.
    I can connect an external monintor which will connect after a return from sleep mode(odd). Which then turns the backlight off.
    When on the external monitor the internal display is not even recognized by windows.
    When I boot in safe mode, the internal screen works fine with of course limited capability.
    I have reloaded display drivers from the support site.
    Right now my internal monitor is not recognized by windows and is dark, and I can use an external monitor.
    Anyone have any clues as to what my be going on? Hardware, driver etc???
    What information can I provide?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    This is a pretty weird issue with conflicting observations.
    1) Screen works in Safe Mode but not in regular boot. (So, not hardware issue)
    2) Display works on external monitor in regular mode. (So, not drivers issue)
    Did you install the wireless card yourself? Did you unplug the display cable while installing the card?
    Could you re-open and check that all connections are good?
    Is the Wi-Fi card working well?
    I would also recommend a complete reset of the laptop to eliminate the possibility that this is a corrupt driver. You can use the NOVO button to reset your laptop. Make sure to make a backup on external drive for your personal files.
    Current System - Lenovo Y510P, GT755M SLI, 8GB RAM, 1TB HDD + 24GB SSD
    When your plans fail, your Real Story begins!!

  • IPhone 4 reception issues are not design related! Proof inside this topic!

    Hello,
    I conducted some very strict tests to verify the reception bug some people are reporting.
    *Test 1:* Holding the iPhone 4 at a specific and precise position with a plastic protection and the left hand covering the bottom left corner making sure both antenna parts are connected by my hand.
    *Test 2:* Holding the iPhone 4 at a specific and precise position WITHOUT any plastic protection and the left hand covering the bottom left corner making sure both antenna parts are connected by my hand, making sure my left hand is perfectly dry.
    *Test 3:* Holding the iPhone 4 at a specific and precise position WITHOUT any plastic protection and the left hand covering the bottom left corner making sure both antenna parts are connected by my hand, making sure my left hand is wet (wetting it before the test)
    *Tests duration:* 2 full minutes.
    Here are the results:
    *Test 1:* Full reception (5 bars), EDGE data network working. Calls are working perfectly as well as data operations (Safari).
    *Test 2:* Full reception (5 bars), EDGE data network working. Calls are working perfectly as well as data operations (Safari).
    *Test 3*: Full reception (5 bars), EDGE data network working. Calls are working perfectly as well as data operations (Safari).
    Geographic location: Paris (France), Bastille district, inside my apartment. Note that I don't get 3G on this location, wathever phone I use (Veryfied with HTC Magic, iPhone 3G and iPhone 4, it's all the same on this aspect).
    *So same exact result for all three tests!*
    *_So what does it mean?_*
    It either means that not all iPhone 4 are affected by this issue (as mine is not affected), or that this issue is not simply related to how you hold your phone and does involve also other elements, like the phone baseband firmware not dealing well with some GSM network configurations (different frequencies...etc) when adding noise (which is what your hand do when holding the phone) or something else.
    This could give credits to the AppleInsider theory that it's related to how the BaseBand firmware is dealing with some GSM network situations and so that it's software related and that a fix is coming soon (see: http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/06/25/deathgrip_hysteria_may_end_monday_with_ios_401.html).
    But it can also mean that it's still purely hardware related and that it's a production fault that affects only some units but not all.
    But it's clearly not a design fault, otherwise all units would be affected and so I would be able to reproduce it with mine, which is not the case (as demonstrated by the tests I conducted).
    _*My advice to those who are affected:*_
    1) Wait a week to see if a software fix get released (as apparently, according to AppleInsider, it may come this very monday as part of an iOS 4.0.1 update), or at least for a confirmation that it's not a software issue in some GSM network configurations.
    2) If it's confirmed that it's a production issues on some units, then get your phone exchanged.

    Well documented post.
    After reading through all the reports I found myself intentionally holding the phone in the "Death-grip".
    I went out that evening and used the phone perfectly fine all day, holding it with a few things, which is actually the way I hold it anyway when texting / msging etc.
    I have a lot of faith that Apple with resolve this with a software update, and hope the fault is related to the BaseBand firmware reported in the appleinsider.
    I am angered by everyone accepting the bloggers so-called "OFFICIAL RESPONSE" as Apples 'Official Response'.
    There is no way, that Apple (Steve Jobs), would use that response via email, back to a single customer.
    Officially... Apple will direct their response to the news directly, or at least something on their website.
    People need to stop jumping on the "Steve Jobs told us to just hold it differently" band-wagon, and wait for something thats actually "OFFICIAL"...
    As i've said in previous posts, just because the news and this blogger has put the word "Official" next to it, does not make it so...
    Rant over...

  • SG300-28P - POE not correctly supported on all ports - possible firmware or hardware issue

    So, I spent some time this weekend troubleshooting the issues I've had  with the new SG300-28P switch and POE to many of my devices in the  office.  As a recap, I cannot utilize all of the 24 POE ports on the switch  for POE purposes.  Really only every other port [with a few odd  combinations thrown in between]. In addition, the SG300-28P switch, on occasion, is sending POE to non-POE devices [e.g. my Ruckus Zone Director 1106].
    Here are my POE devices [all 802.3 af-compliant]:
    3 Ruckus 7982 access points
    1 Pakedge access point
    2 home-automation controllers
    2 Polycom voip phones
    I called Cisco support several times in regards to this problem, and they figured it was a hardware issue - a faulty switch.  So, Cisco sent me a replacement SG300-28P, which I  hooked up today.  The exact problem still occurs.  Default configuration  [fresh out of the box].  No way I can land, for example, the 3 Ruckus  7982 AP's on ports 1, 2, and 3 [or ports 1,13, and 2].  I have to put  them on ports 1, 3, and 5 in order for them to power up.  In addition, I  can't plug any other POE devices on the ports either between or below  them.   I had to skip another port bay.  This is very odd behavior!!   Two Cisco SG300-28P's in a row with the same problem.
    However, I also had one of the new Cisco SG300-10P switches in my  possession for a recent project of ours.  I decided to hook up the same  POE devices to this switch.  ALL POE devices were recognized and  worked!  No need to skip a port.  And it didn't matter what device was  plugged in first or not.  I am now convinced that it is either a  hardware issue [bad power supply/transformer?] inside all of the  SG300-28P switches, or a firmware issue. 
    Both of the SG300-28P switches were running firmware 1.1.2 [the  latest on Cisco's website].  So, I decided to install an older firmware  version on the SG300-28P switch that I'm returning [installed 1.1.1.8].   Here's what I found out.  I could then plug 2 POE devices [e.g. two  Ruckus AP's] in adjacent horizontal ports, but not three in a row.  In  addition, not all adjacent ports.  It's funky. For example, I could plug  an access point in ports 20 and 21, but not in 21 and 22.  No rhyme or  reason in how it worked.  And I still couldn't plug an access point in  adjacent vertical ports [e.g. ports 1 and 13].  BUT...
    It's interesting that the same exact switch that would not initially  allow 2 horizontally-adjacent POE ports to be utilized WOULD allow 2  horizontally-adjacent POE ports to be utilized when running a different  firmware version.   It's also interesting to note that when plugged into  a "non-working" POE  port, the SG300-28P would actually make a small whining noise.  Very  subtle noise; I could hear it when approx. 1ft away from the switch.   The noise was not noticeable when ports were skipped [and POE actually  worked].  Therefore, I believe that Cisco has some SG300-28P firmware  bugs [at least in the last two versions of firmware] that is not truly  allowing all 24 ports to utilize POE correctly.  This problem does not  exist with the SG300-10P switch.
    I'm really interested to hear what Cisco's reply and findings on this  matter would be.  And would welcome a reply from one of their senior  support team members/managers who could actually experiment with this,  too.   In addition, I'd like to know when they think a solution could be  created if it's firmware-related.  If hardware-related, I don't think  I'll be recommending any 28P switches in our projects.  Perhaps just the  regular SG300-28 with a separate SG300-10P.  It's a shame because the  SG300-28P is more of a bargain when compared to the two separate  components.

    show power inline
    Port based power-limit mode
    Unit  Power  Nominal Power   Consumed Power   Usage Threshold   Traps  
    1     On      180 Watts     13 Watts (7%)          95         Disable 
      Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class  
      gi1                               Auto            On      critical  class0  
      gi2                              Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi3                               Auto        Searching   critical  class0  
      gi4                              Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi5                               Auto            On      critical  class0  
      gi6                              Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi7                               Auto            On      critical  class2  
      gi8                               Auto        Searching     low     class0  
      gi9                               Auto        Searching     low     class0  
      gi10                              Auto        Searching     low     class0  
      gi11                              Auto        Searching     low     class0  
      gi12                             Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi13                             Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi14                             Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi15                             Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi16                             Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi17                             Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi18                             Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi19                             Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi20                              Auto        Searching     low     class0  
      gi21                             Never           Off        low     class0  
      gi22                              Auto        Searching     low     class0  
    [0mMore: ,  Quit: q or CTRL+Z, One line:                                                          gi23                              Auto        Searching     low     class0  
      gi24                              Auto        Searching     low     class0  
    show power inline gigabitethernet xx (for each device plugged in)
      Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class  
      gi1                               Auto            On      critical  class0  
    Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
    Port Status:               Port is on - valid resistor detected
    Overload Counter:          0
    Short Counter:             0
    Denied Counter:            0
    Absent Counter:            3
    Invalid Signature Counter: 17583
      Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class  
      gi2                              Never           Off        low     class0  
    Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
    Port Status:               Port is off - user setting
    Overload Counter:          0
    Short Counter:             0
    Denied Counter:            0
    Absent Counter:            0
    Invalid Signature Counter: 0
      Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class  
      gi3                               Auto        Searching   critical  class0  
    Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
    Port Status:               Port is off - detection is in process
    Overload Counter:          0
    Short Counter:             0
    Denied Counter:            0
    Absent Counter:            2
    Invalid Signature Counter: 1
    Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class  
      gi4                              Never           Off        low     class0  
    Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
    Port Status:               Port is off - user setting
    Overload Counter:          0
    Short Counter:             0
    Denied Counter:            0
    Absent Counter:            0
    Invalid Signature Counter: 0
    Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class  
      gi5                               Auto            On      critical  class0  
    Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
    Port Status:               Port is on - valid resistor detected
    Overload Counter:          0
    Short Counter:             0
    Denied Counter:            0
    Absent Counter:            0
    Invalid Signature Counter: 0
      Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class  
      gi7                               Auto            On      critical  class2  
    Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
    Port Status:               Port is on - valid resistor detected
    Overload Counter:          0
    Short Counter:             0
    Denied Counter:            0
    Absent Counter:            0
    Invalid Signature Counter: 0
      Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class  
      gi13                             Never           Off        low     class0  
    Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
    Port Status:               Port is off - user setting
    Overload Counter:          0
    Short Counter:             0
    Denied Counter:            0
    Absent Counter:            1
    Invalid Signature Counter: 0
      Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class  
      gi14                             Never           Off        low     class0  
    Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
    Port Status:               Port is off - user setting
    Overload Counter:          0
    Short Counter:             0
    Denied Counter:            0
    Absent Counter:            0
    Invalid Signature Counter: 0
    show interfaces advertise gigabitethernet xx (for what ports are of interest)
    Port: gi9      
    Type: 1G-Copper
    Link state: Down
    Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                      1000f  1000h  100f  100h  10f  10h
    Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes  yes 
    Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Port: gi10     
    Type: 1G-Copper
    Link state: Down
    Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                      1000f  1000h  100f  100h  10f  10h
    Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes  yes 
    Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    -
    Port: gi11     
    Type: 1G-Copper
    Link state: Down
    Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                      1000f  1000h  100f  100h  10f  10h
    Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes  yes 
    Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    -
    Port: gi21     
    Type: 1G-Copper
    Link state: Down
    Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                      1000f  1000h  100f  100h  10f  10h
    Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes  yes 
    Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    -
    Port: gi22     
    Type: 1G-Copper
    Link state: Down
    Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                      1000f  1000h  100f  100h  10f  10h
    Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes  yes 
    Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Port: gi23     
    Type: 1G-Copper
    Link state: Down
    Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                      1000f  1000h  100f  100h  10f  10h
    Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes  yes 
    Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    - 
    Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    - 

  • Iphone camera shutter not opening...not sure if software or hardware issue.

    Hey everyone,
    So I've had my iphone 4 for about 3 months now. It was working perfectly until last week. The camera shutter will not open for some reason. I can't use the front face or the regular camera. This also does not allow me to facetime. I would turn off the iphone, cancel all the apps, and SOMETIMES it would work, but now it just doesn't. Now the weird thing is that when I downloaded third party camera apps from the apple store, my regular camera was working, but my front face camera was not. Also facebook allows me to snap photos, but not front face photos....
    I'm not sure if this is a hardware issue, only because my iphone was working perfect for months before this problem occurred. Should I restore it?
    I've had such terrible luck with iphones, if i can't do anything about it and Apple has to replace it, this is the second time i'm going to have to replace the phone since getting the iphone in april.
    PLEASE HELP!

    A simple search via the forums here or google would have revealed a multitude of posts about this issue, basic troubleshooting, and possible resolutions.
    The "More Like This" section to the right of the posting should also be helpful.

  • I have an hardware issue with my iphone 5 64gb. its lock button in not working. for a fact i know that it can be replaced but my question is this that do they require the bill or anything to replace or they only require the phone in usa

    i have an hardware issue with my iphone 5 64gb. its lock button in not working. for a fact i know that it can be replaced but my question is this that do they require the bill or anything to replace or they only require the phone in usa

    Warranty and support is only valid in the country of origin.  The only exception being the EU where a device bought in any EU country can get warranty or service in any EU country.
    Warranty is determined by device (serial number), no documentation required.
    Apple does not repair devices, they replace them.  For that reason, ensure the device is backed up and any pictures take with the device are copied off the device prior to going in for service.

  • HT201401 my i phone 4s camera is not working... tried everything but of no use...may be the hardware issues.Then how to resolve it? warranty is void..suggest please!!!!!!!

    my i phone 4s camera is not working... tried everything but of no use...may be the hardware issues.Then how to resolve it? warranty is void..suggest please!!!!!!!

    Basic troubleshooting from the User's Guide is reset, restart, restore (first from backup then as new).  If each of these has been tried and the issue still occurs, the only option left is to take to Apple for evaluation and possible replacement.
    Out of Warranty replacement is $199US.

  • HT204053 The SIM card that you currently have installed in this iPhone is from a carrier that is not supported under the activation policy that is currently assigned by the activation server. This is not a hardware issue with the iPhone. Please insert ano

    sir have this error so what can i do The SIM card that you currently have installed in this iPhone is from a carrier that is not supported under the activation policy that is currently assigned by the activation server. This is not a hardware issue with the iPhone. Please insert another SIM card from a supported carrier or request that this iPhone be unlocked by your carrier. Please contact Apple for more information.

    It looks like the iPhone is locked to a carrier that is not the one you are trying to use.
    You need to determine which carrier it is locked to and then contact them to see if they are willing to authorise the unlocking of your iPhone.  As ManSinha mentioned, many carriers will only authorised the unlock if requested by the customer who had the contract with them for this iPhone.
    Remember that only the carrier who owns the lock on your Iphone can authorise Apple to unlock the iPhone in their servers.  You need to contact the carrier or have the previous owner of the iPhone request the unlocking.

  • HT1937 the SIM card that you currently have installed in this iPhone is form a carrier that is not supported under the activation policy that is currently assigned by the activation server.this is not a hardware issue with the iphon. please insert another

    the SIM card that you currently have installed in this iPhone is form a carrier that is not supported under the activation policy that is currently assigned by the activation server.this is not a hardware issue with the iphon. please insert another SIM card from supported carrier or request that this iPhone be unlocked by your carrier.

    Similar issue
    here is the description
    I have similar message but for me the Verizon guys said they unlocked it and when I actually connected to iTunes using Verizon sim card and then did the restore as new iphone then everything worked well and at the end i saw the message "Congrats, your iphone is now unlocked" and then I did the set up as new iphone for my kid.
    Once new apple ID was set up, then I removed the verizon SIM and then inserted prepaid t-mobile sim card and after the phone booted up then I got the same message like  above...."not supported"
    What do i do now? I think the phone is unlocked right?
    Also do I need to insert Verizon SIM card and do restore as NEW and this time do not set up the iphone but change the SIM card and then set up or ?
    I am confused and other threads were talking that if you get congrats message then u shd be good to use other SIM cards....please help!!!

Maybe you are looking for