Weird Locked Files issue

Hi I have a strange problem with locked files on OS X. Somehow I have ended up with 2 files on my desktop which I just can't get rid of.
They have a filesize of zero KB so I guess they are not proper files (they have the icon & name of two mp3s I have)
When I try and delete them I get a message saying they are in use by a program. I have tried rebooting, closing all running programs, still same issue.
If I do "get info" I can see that the file is locked, but then option to untick it is greyed out even after I unlock the padlock in the lower right corner.
I then looked on google for suggestions and tried deleting them with the terminal (using 'rm') and I get the message "Override for <filename>?" I say yes and then it says "Operation not permitted". I also tried this in single user mode and it said "Read only file system" and also didn't work.
I'm at a bit of a loss, does anyone have any ideas how I can get rid of those two files?

Perhaps those files for some reason have system immutable flags on them. Try this: http://osxfaq.com/Tutorials/LearningCenter/AdvancedUnix/ugp2/page2.ws#sif
P.s.: Don't follow the part where he creates the file. Just follow the part where he deletes the file and make sure you replace the file name he specified with the file name that you saw on those files.

Similar Messages

  • Weird Locked Files/Permissions/Dock/Etc

    I have some sort of odd locked file/permissions problem (I think).
    About a year ago, I seem to have done something to my permissions or locked files that I can't seem to fix.  I have a variety of disparate symptoms, including applications that won't work or can't be installed/deleted because support or preference files are locked or can't be changed, a need to repeatedly reauthenticate with a password just to move files from one folder to the next, an inability to turn off file sync for mobile me, dock item changes that go away whenever I reboot, locked files that continually reopen in Preview, having to manually delete and reinstall apps like Preview apparently because of locked preference files, printers that won't work because of locked files until I delete all and reinstall, software that won't run properly or fails to launch at all on double click, etc.
    It is almost like a ghost in the machine problem because the problems are relatively varied.
    I've tried disk utility etc to repair permissions and none of the repairs work (I keep getting the same errors, copied below).  I've tried a complete reinstall of the OS, repair permissions from the OS X restore disk, etc. and nothing seems to help.
    This is happening on a Mac Pro 1,1 (3.0 GHz), running 10.7.4 with all updates through today and with a Radeon 4870 card, and 9 GB of properly matched ram.  Everything else works pretty well and I have no similar problems on my wife's 2011 iMac, my MacBookAir i5, etc.
    I'm thinking that there is some sort of locked file or permissions problem that is not getting fixed correctly and that there might be some trick to fixing it.
    Help!!
    Repairing permissions for “Master”
    ACL found but not expected on “Library/Printers”
    Repaired “Library/Printers”
    ACL found but not expected on “private/etc/apache2/users”
    Repaired “private/etc/apache2/users”
    ACL found but not expected on “Library/Printers/PPDs”
    Repaired “Library/Printers/PPDs”
    ACL found but not expected on “Library/Printers/PPDs/Contents”
    Repaired “Library/Printers/PPDs/Contents”
    ACL found but not expected on “Library/Printers/PPDs/Contents/Resources”
    Repaired “Library/Printers/PPDs/Contents/Resources”
    ACL differs on “Users”
    Repaired “Users”
    ACL found but not expected on “private/var/root”
    Repaired “private/var/root”
    ACL found but not expected on “private/var/root/Library”
    Repaired “private/var/root/Library”
    ACL found but not expected on “private/var/root/Library/Preferences”
    Repaired “private/var/root/Library/Preferences”
    Permissions repair complete

    Repairing the permissions of a home folder in Lion is a complicated procedure. I don’t know of a simpler one that always works.
    Back up all data now. Before proceeding, you must be sure you can restore your system to its present state
    Launch the Terminal application in any of the following ways:
    ☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
    ☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
    ☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Terminal in the page that opens.
    Drag or copy — do not type — the following line into the Terminal window, then press return:
    chmod -R -N ~
    The command will take a noticeable amount of time to run. When a new line ending in a dollar sign ($) appears below what you entered, it’s done. You may see a few error messages about an “invalid argument” while the command is running. You can ignore those. If you get an error message with the words “Permission denied,” enter this:
    sudo !!
    You'll be prompted for your login password, which won't be displayed when you type it. You may get a one-time warning not to screw up.
    Next, boot into Recovery by holding down the key combination command-R at startup. Release the keys when you see a gray screen with a spinning dial.
    When the Recovery screen appears, select Utilities ▹ Terminal from the menu bar.
    In the Terminal window, enter “resetpassword” (without the quotes) and press return. A Reset Password window opens. You’re not going to reset the password.
    Select your boot volume if not already selected.
    Select your username from the menu labeled Select the user account if not already selected.
    Under Reset Home Directory Permissions and ACLs, click the Reset button.
    Select  ▹ Restart from the menu bar.

  • Weird Media File Issue

    Powerbook G4 17" -- Mac OS X 10.4.10 -- FCP 5.0.4
    Has this ever happened to anyone else?
    I've been having trouble capturing to one of my external hard drives, so I recently decided to just capture to my other external drive and copy the files. So I did that...I captured all of the media for my project on the one drive ("Drive A"). Once it was all captured, I copied all of the files from "Drive A" to "Drive B". In FCP, I used the Reconnect Media option to link the clips in my project to the media files on "Drive B". There are 12 total clips (with 12 corresponding media files), and here's where it gets weird: The "Mismatch" error pops up, saying that the Media Start and End of one or more clips don't match the files. If I click on "Try again", it shows that four of the 12 are coming up with errors. I don't understand how these files can have any different properties from the files on "Drive A", as I copied them directly from one to the other. I haven't modified the files in any way! Since I have not yet deleted the original files from "Drive A", I decided to try (out of curiosity) to import said files from "Drive B" into the project bin so I could compare side-by-side the Media Start and Media End properties. To my surprise, the Media End is different! By just under two seconds on each clip! Now, how can this property have changed, just by the act of copying the file from one drive to the other? I'm really puzzled by this. Anybody have any clues?

    you should definitely be very careful after getting this message.
    We got it when we accidentally tried to shift clips from 23.98fps timelines to 24fps or vice versa.
    When it was video, the problem was obvious: a missing frame at the end of each clip. But with the audio, FCP actually interpreted the media file differently, reading a different part of the file than before!
    So check all the clips for which you had this message to make sure they're still in sync.
    Even though all our machines are working in 23.98 now (including captures settings, sequence settings etc.), we are still experiencing this problems when sending projects back and forth (our production takes place in different studios). Some sound files (but not all of them) reconnect with this problem, which makes it almost impossible to transfer the exact sound edit.
    If anyone has more information about this "Media Start and End" alert, please let us know. I saw other people having this problem in other forums, but no solution for the moment.
    Thanks
    Gilad

  • Locking up issue?

    On two occasions since upgrading to Lion, my IMac24 has locked up. Although it's a weird locking up issue because I can still move the mouse around, but nothing else actually works. No apps work. CMD+ALT+ESC doesn't work. The only solution is to reboot. Very frustrating.

    I had the same thing happening on my new 27" iMac after installing Lion. I narrowed it down to the Flash plugin a few days ago. I found this third party app that disable flash, ClickToFlash.
    http://hoyois.github.com/safariextensions/clicktoplugin/
    If a web site uses HTML 5 a h.264 video will be used instead of the Flash video. For example YouTube, Facebook and Vimeo… If a webpage uses Flash video only, you can double click to play the Flash video. No locking up for a few days now.
    I have also read that if you uncheck 'enable hardware acceleration' in the Flash settings, this should fix the freezing up too. Right click on a Flash video while it is playing…. pick Settings from the menu… uncheck 'enable hardware acceleration'. I also did this and still no freezing up on my iMac!!!
    iMac 27", 3.4GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7, 16GB 1333MHz DDR3, 2TB HD + 256GB SSD, AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2GB GDDR5 • FCS 3 • OS X 10.7 (Lion) • iPad 1&2 • Apple Tv 2

  • Issue with the report oracle.apps.xdo.XDOException:Error creating lock file

    I am getting an error while submitting the XML publisher report in Betsy N0 instance.
    Issue
    Log :- Beginning post-processing of request 145458120 on node BETSYN0DB1 at 22-DEC-2011 05:28:26.
    Post-processing of request 145458120 failed at 22-DEC-2011 05:28:28 with the error message: One or more post-processing actions failed. Consult the OPP service log for details
    Output :- Blank Report
    XML file :- XML file generated without any error
    Output process:-
    [12/23/11 4:28:10 AM] [1213640:RT145480622] Completed post-processing actions for request 145480622.
    [12/23/11 5:16:01 AM] [OPPServiceThread1] Post-processing request 145481427.
    [12/23/11 5:49:30 AM] [OPPServiceThread1] Post-processing request 145481923.
    [12/23/11 5:49:30 AM] [1213640:RT145481923] Executing post-processing actions for request 145481923.
    [12/23/11 5:49:30 AM] [1213640:RT145481923] Starting XML Publisher post-processing action.
    [12/23/11 5:49:30 AM] [1213640:RT145481923]
    Template code: XXWIP_WO_VLVS
    Template app: XXWIP
    Language: en
    Territory: US
    Output type: PDF
    oracle.apps.xdo.XDOException: Error creating lock file
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.util.FontCacheManager.getFontFromDB(FontCacheManager.java:320)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.util.FontCacheManager.getFontFilePath(FontCacheManager.java:198)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.util.FontHelper.createFontProperties(FontHelper.java:432)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.util.ConfigHelper.getFontProperties(ConfigHelper.java:166)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.runProcessTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:5824)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.processTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:3459)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.processTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:3548)
         at oracle.apps.fnd.cp.opp.XMLPublisherProcessor.process(XMLPublisherProcessor.java:247)
         at oracle.apps.fnd.cp.opp.OPPRequestThread.run(OPPRequestThread.java:157)
    [12/23/11 5:49:31 AM] [UNEXPECTED] [1213640:RT145481923] oracle.apps.xdo.XDOException: Error creating lock file
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.util.FontCacheManager.getFontFromDB(FontCacheManager.java:320)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.util.FontCacheManager.getFontFilePath(FontCacheManager.java:198)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.util.FontHelper.createFontProperties(FontHelper.java:432)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.util.ConfigHelper.getFontProperties(ConfigHelper.java:166)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.runProcessTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:5824)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.processTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:3459)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.processTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:3548)
         at oracle.apps.fnd.cp.opp.XMLPublisherProcessor.process(XMLPublisherProcessor.java:247)
         at oracle.apps.fnd.cp.opp.OPPRequestThread.run(OPPRequestThread.java:157)
    [12/23/11 5:49:31 AM] [1213640:RT145481923] Completed post-processing actions for request 145481923.

    The issue is fixed.
    Our XML Publisher TMP is not defined, so it uses the APPLTMP used by concurrent manager. There is a folder xdofonts/<SID> in $APPLTMP. It contains the fonts used by XML publisher and on the of font file (.ttf) was 0 byte. We copied the ttf file from QA. And it started working.
    Best practice is to define diffent TMP for concurrent managers and XML Publisher.
    Cherrish Vaidiyan

  • DW CS3 locked files and FTP issues - cannot update pages

    I just upgraded to Dreamweaver CS3 and now cant seem to
    update any of my web pages. I can connect to the server etc and see
    my files locally & remotely but when I try check out a file to
    update it I get an error message saying 'index.html is a locked
    file and can be viewed but not changed'. All I can do with it is
    view it. When I try to unlock any files locally nothing happens????
    This was not an issue before I upgraded.....I have checked my
    FTP details with a version on my pc and there are exactly the
    same.....does anyone know is this an issue with mac version of
    Dreamweaver CS3?
    Help!!!

    Can you post a link to your child or template page and tell
    us what you have
    changed that didn't propagate?
    Here are seven common mistakes that will result in changes
    not propagating
    from Template to child -
    1. Rename the Templates folder
    2. Move the Templates folder to some other folder level in
    the site other
    than root level
    3. Move a template out of the Templates folder.
    4. Make changes to an editable region of the template (which
    will not
    propagate)
    5. Assume that template changes can be uploaded to the server
    without also
    uploading the changed local files
    6. Corrupt the site cache so that the link between template
    and child page
    is broken
    7, Improperly create your child pages by simply opening the
    template,
    adding page specific content, and resaving the template with
    an *.html
    extension rather that its *.dwt extension. (you can tell if
    this is the case
    by looking at the code on a child page - if you see anything
    like <!--
    TemplateBeginEditable... then this is what you have done). If
    you *have
    done this*, then recreate the child pages (in DWCS3) using
    FILE | New > Page
    from Template, select the template and click CREATE.
    The 6th problem can be repaired by using SITE | Advanced >
    Recreate Site
    Cache, and the six others can be fixed by just not doing
    them. Have you
    done any of those?
    Or, read this -
    http://www.adobe.com/go/dd83ba8b
    By the way, this is not an official communication vehicle to
    Adobe. We are
    all just volunteers and peers here.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    ==================
    "gwbusiness" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Hi honeybugs,
    >
    > I am having the same problem and I need a global fix so
    that I can
    > immediately
    > update my site . . . did Adobe help you? This did not
    happen immediately
    > to my
    > files but my template does not now update pages . . . I
    am desparate.
    >
    > Thank you,
    >
    > Gail
    >

  • Leopard FAT32 Issue, Can't delete Panasonic P2 media locked files

    For all final cut users now using a P2 workflow - I ran into an issue with leopard and have to downgrade to tiger.
    Leopard is now honoring the "read only" setting on all the media files created by a panasonic P2 camera. My workflow was to dump a card onto my macbook pro while shooting on another card. When the transfer was complete, I would erase the media on the P2 card and put it back in the camera to continue shooting.
    Unfortunately in Leopard, I cannot do anything to delete the files on the P2 card. I cannot unlock them in the get info window, I cannot unlock them in the terminal, I cannot drag them to the trash and force empty the trash, and I cannot even delete them via "sudo rm -Rf". I have tried numerous ways of formatting the card via the terminal, but something about its formatting is very specific, and the camera will not shoot on the card if I format it in OS X.
    It seems the Leopard Fat32 implementation here is too strict - as I can't remove locked files. Even when running as sudo - Has anyone been able to do this?
    Unfortunately I have to downgrade if I can't solve this, because formatting the card in the camera is not an option, as I need to run a continuous shoot.

    Yes, this is true - In Tiger, a flawless way of erasing the card without messing up the formatting on the mac was to use the panasonic software. But now in Leopard, you cannot even use the panasonic software to erase the card, because something in the system is not allowing anything locked on a fat32 partition to be modified.
    It seems someone tech savvy out there could figure out the proper terminal command on how to format those cards - Which brings me back to the question - why does "sudo rm -Rf" get a permission denied.

  • Issue with lock file in Oracle 10g app server - MDB not running

    Hi,
    I have Oracle 10g & MQ 6 on my laptop. I generated JNDI bindings for app server-MQ by giving ip address of my machine first. Then i changed it to "localhost" & generated new set of .bindings file.
    With this new set i am able to send messages from my program to a queue. I also have an MDB which should listen to the same queue.
    However now my mdb is not listening to the queue & i suspect it is due to host address change, - because each time i start the server, i see a lock file created "OracleASRouter_store.lock" - under j2ee\home\persistance. And below is the content of the same -
    "O10.1.4.245:/C:/Program Files/Oracle/oc4j_extended_101330/j2ee/home/persistence/"
    As per few suggestions on this site, I deleted this file & restated app server, deleted whole content of persistance folder, restarted app server. But each time i see this file created and also see the ip address in log.xml under j2ee\home\log\oc4j
    Error message in this log.xml file is
    <MESSAGE>
    <HEADER>
    <TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2007-09-19T11:22:35.265-04:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING>
    <COMPONENT_ID>j2ee</COMPONENT_ID>
    <MSG_ID>J2EE EJB-02009</MSG_ID>
    <MSG_TYPE TYPE="WARNING"></MSG_TYPE>
    <MSG_LEVEL>1</MSG_LEVEL>
    <HOST_ID>IFLEXNY-EXT99</HOST_ID>
    <HOST_NWADDR>10.1.4.245</HOST_NWADDR>
    <MODULE_ID>ejb.runtime</MODULE_ID>
    <THREAD_ID>10</THREAD_ID>
    <USER_ID>chetanmi</USER_ID>
    </HEADER>
    <CORRELATION_DATA>
    <EXEC_CONTEXT_ID><UNIQUE_ID>10.1.4.245:65858:1190215355296:0</UNIQUE_ID><SEQ>0</SEQ></EXEC_CONTEXT_ID>
    </CORRELATION_DATA>
    <PAYLOAD>
    <MSG_TEXT>[STGMQ:STGMQEJB:TestMDB] Unexpected exception by JMS provider: javax.jms.MessageEOFException: initializeConnection.</MSG_TEXT>
    <SUPPL_DETAIL><![CDATA[javax.jms.MessageEOFException: initializeConnection
         at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSUtils.make(JMSUtils.java:1075)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSUtils.toJMSException(JMSUtils.java:1155)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.TCPJMSRemoteServer.initializeConnection(TCPJMSRemoteServer.java:154)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.TCPJMSRemoteServer.initializeConnection(TCPJMSRemoteServer.java:110)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.TCPJMSRemoteServer.<init>(TCPJMSRemoteServer.java:68)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindConnection.<init>(EvermindConnection.java:122)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueConnection.<init>(EvermindQueueConnection.java:70)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueConnectionFactory.unprivileged_createQueueConnection(EvermindQueueConnectionFactory.java:101)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueConnectionFactory.access$000(EvermindQueueConnectionFactory.java:44)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueConnectionFactory$1.execute(EvermindQueueConnectionFactory.java:81)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.InContainerProxy.doSecureOp(InContainerProxy.java:157)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueConnectionFactory.createQueueConnection(EvermindQueueConnectionFactory.java:78)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueConnectionFactory.createQueueConnection(EvermindQueueConnectionFactory.java:69)
         at com.evermind.server.ejb.MessageDrivenConsumer.createNonXAResources(MessageDrivenConsumer.java:567)
         at com.evermind.server.ejb.MessageDrivenConsumer.initializeJMSResources(MessageDrivenConsumer.java:491)
         at com.evermind.server.ejb.MessageDrivenConsumer.processMessages(MessageDrivenConsumer.java:208)
         at com.evermind.server.ejb.MessageDrivenConsumer.run(MessageDrivenConsumer.java:169)
         at com.evermind.util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:298)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
    Caused by: java.io.EOFException
         at java.io.DataInputStream.readInt(DataInputStream.java:358)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSRemoteServer.readCheck(JMSRemoteServer.java:678)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSRemoteServer.readProtocol(JMSRemoteServer.java:696)
         at com.evermind.server.jms.TCPJMSRemoteServer.initializeConnection(TCPJMSRemoteServer.java:134)
         ... 16 more
    ]]></SUPPL_DETAIL>
    </PAYLOAD>
    </MESSAGE>
    <MESSAGE>
    <HEADER>
    <TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2007-09-19T11:22:35.312-04:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING>
    <COMPONENT_ID>j2ee</COMPONENT_ID>
    <MSG_ID>J2EE EJB-02014</MSG_ID>
    <MSG_TYPE TYPE="WARNING"></MSG_TYPE>
    <MSG_LEVEL>1</MSG_LEVEL>
    <HOST_ID>IFLEXNY-EXT99</HOST_ID>
    <HOST_NWADDR>10.1.4.245</HOST_NWADDR>
    <MODULE_ID>ejb.runtime</MODULE_ID>
    <THREAD_ID>10</THREAD_ID>
    <USER_ID>chetanmi</USER_ID>
    </HEADER>
    <CORRELATION_DATA>
    <EXEC_CONTEXT_ID><UNIQUE_ID>10.1.4.245:65858:1190215355296:0</UNIQUE_ID><SEQ>0</SEQ></EXEC_CONTEXT_ID>
    </CORRELATION_DATA>
    <PAYLOAD>
    <MSG_TEXT>[STGMQ:STGMQEJB:TestMDB] All message consumer threads have terminated due to provider errors, stopping MDB.</MSG_TEXT>
    </PAYLOAD>
    </MESSAGE>
    And my MDB is NOT WORKING. Please let me know how to deal with this.
    Your suggestions would be much appreciated.
    Regard,
    Chetan

    Line # 127 is creating a new application object using ApplicationFactory.
    ApplicationFactory aFactory =
    (ApplicationFactory) FactoryFinder.getFactory(
    FactoryFinder.APPLICATION_FACTORY);
    application = aFactory.getApplication();
    The only way that can throw a null pointer is when aFactory is NULL. I really doubt this case because, the same thing is doen in init() of FacesServlet. If it had failed there, the exception should have occured during server startup.
    This leaves me more and more confused....I am desperate for some help now :((
    Ramesh

  • Lock Box File issue

    I in the process of trying to test the lockbox upload and I was hoping someone could help me on this file issue.
    the bank is providing the file as below for the "6" and the "4" record
    620000100000480351220002470375406600000000014936CONCISYS INCORPORATE20111026    
    42000016019                     901293890        0000048035                
    my issue is I cannot get SAP to match the invoice number becuase of the spaces.     If I remove the spaces from the  fil SAP will l match the invoice and clear the invoice.  The bank is giving me the file in a Fixed Length format.  
    I have also tried the file this way
    620300100000455000759116030755701208000000279048SIGNICAST           20120117    
    4203001601900000018000606470000045500  
    sap does not like the extra "0"  in the fields.
    I am  indicating the file is a BAI2.
    Any insight would help.

    Hi,
    If your file is in BAI2, this is the format, For Record type 6 :
    Here for example the Check total amount is 15670.89
    Data Type     Length     Description     
    NUMC     1     Record Type for Lockbox     6
    NUMC     3     Batch Number for Lockbox (Bundle Number)     001
    NUMC     3     Batch Item Number for Lockbox     001
    NUMC     10     Remittance Amount  (Check total  Amount) for Lockbox     0001567089
    CHAR     9     Remitter Identifier 1: Transit Routing Number for Lockbox (Customer' bank transit routing number)     111000614
    CHAR     10     Remitter Identifier 2: Account Number for Lockbox  (customer bank account number)      0000000000
    NUMC     9     Check Number     000014801
    CHAR     35     Data Element Type CHAR Length 35     ENERFLEXENERGYSYSTEMINC
    For above example the record type 6 should be:
    600100100015670891110006140000000000000014801ENERFLEXENERGYSYSTEMINC
    And for Record type 4:
    For below mentioned example:
    Invoice number is - 1800000001 (But total character space is 16, as this field is CHARACTER in nature so we will add 0's at the end)
    Invoice amount - 15670.89
    Deduction amount - 0
    Data Type     Length     Description     
    NUMC     1     Record Type for Lockbox     4
    NUMC     3     Batch Number for Lockbox (Bundle Number)     001
    NUMC     3     Batch Item Number for Lockbox     001
    NUMC     1     Type of Overflow(Recd Type 4 Still Belongs to a Recd Type 6)     6
    NUMC     2     Sequence Number - Serial Number of Record Type 4     01
    NUMC     1     End Indicator ('9' the Last Record of a Type 4 Series)     9
    CHAR     16     Invoice number     1800000001000000
    NUMC     10     Payment Amount     0001567089
    NUMC     10     Deduction amount     0000000000
    CHAR     3     External Reason Code for Payment Differences     000
    CHAR     30     30 Characters     
    The record 4 should be:
    40010016019180000000100000000015670890000000000000
    Assuming that its a first and last record in 4, that means 1 invoice and 1 check only.
    Sometimes instead of using zeros bank uses space, the choice can be yours. You can tell the bank that you want zeros instead of space. I am also working on Lockbox and already did several testing by creating mock files. Create your own mock files and see how your system is  responding. Then ask bank to follow the same.
    For rest of the records like RT 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, you will get the standard BAI2 format from SE12 - Database - FLB01, FLB02, FLB05, FLB26, FLB24, FLB07, FLB08, FLB09. Create some FI invoices in B70 and create your mock files using the standard BAI2 format. upload the file using FLB2 and test it. Test with different scenarios like within tolerance, w/o tolerance, with reason code etc
    Thanks
    Meha

  • Mac Lock Files on Windows File Server.

    Hi Pro,
    got some problem with Mac based design studio who have some weird issues with files locking on a Windows Server 2008 R2 server. After investigation, it is 100% a file locking issue. Some programs including preview, acrobat, indesign, finder or opening files (assuming locking them) and not releasing. Killing all the programs or remounting the share is working (releasing all lock files) but it's only a workaround not a fix. Do you any hints ? or Solutions ? all 10.7.3 Mac, using SMB protocol on a windows 2008 R2 File server.
    Thanks to all !!!

    yeah try this ... sorry french blog .. try google translate:
    http://clickpom.com/blog/mac-finder-lock-files-on-windows-server-smb-shared/
    this fix the issue for my client

  • Vista problem with  Dreamweaver locking files indiscriminately - I'm not alone

    I've seen questions posed in the past about Vista locking files - and I am having the exact same problem, which I posted about a while ago.  Today it happened to me again.
    There appears to be no pattern as to why this happens.  Was happening to me continually until a few weeks ago. Then it stopped without me taking any course of action (just putting up with the annoying bug is all I could do).
    You just have to remember to save the file under a different name to ensure that you don't lose your original file.  The original file does not appear in the File Manager window (after you close down DW, nor does it appear in the Trash bin - it's just gone).
    Initially I thought it may be due to having the file open, checking it in Firefox and possibly FF taking over the file, so it gets locked by DW.  Today, I only opened the file (no checking in a browser at all) made a minor correction and I was locked out of the file.
    Co-incidentally, a few hours ago, I found a website via twitter where this seems to be a known issue, but no there appears to be no response from Adobe about this bug.   http://www.sherylcanter.com/wordpress/2009/05/locked-vanishing-files-in-dreamweaver-and-in design/
    Previously, I used to restart the pc and I'd lose the file altogether (as explained above).  After reading the above website, I'm going to leave DW open for a while to see if it's true about the file 'unlocking itself'.  Thankfully,, this time, I did backup the file just in case.  In the past I'd lost a fair amount of work, that I'd had to recreate - very annoying !!
    I thought I'd post up a graphic of the error messages - to see if others are seeing the same thing. This will need to be bought to the attention of the DW tech team, but not sure how they can address the issue as it is a difficult thing to reproduce on a consistent basis.
    AN UPDATE;  Checked for the file in Windows File manager - the index.html page is not listed in the sitefolder.  Back to Dreamweaver, you can still see the locked file, do a refresh and the index.html file has disappeared.
    I open index2.html (the resaved version of index,html), rename it to index.html and it allows me to do so this time round.
    PS:  At the same time I opened inner.html, made a change, no problems with the file locking.
    Weird !!
    Further update:
    Just found a reply by David Powers here:  http://forums.adobe.com/thread/437034?tstart=30
    I had tried to do a search using similar keywords when this started happening to me months ago - couldn't find anything at the time.
    I even posted to a private forum where people should have known about this issue - but it was never responded to.
    Will see if this fix works for me....  though I can't understand why it only does this occasionally - if someone needs to take control of the folder, surely it should be happening all the time.

    Nadia,
    Although Dreamweaver "reveals" and demonstrates it, I think that it's a deep-seated Vista permissions issue.
    It's random and occurs on files I create from scratch and files I receive from others.
    Full permissions for every single user and group on my PC doesn't work.
    "Take ownership" by my account or Administrator or Administrators or System or Everyone or Authenticated Users doesn't work.
    UAC deactivation doesn't work.
    Command prompt to unset attributes (like read-only) says it ISN'T read-only, but the right-click properties show that it is.
    Only this works so far.
    Activate Vista's Administrator account (be sure to then set a password for it).
    Log in as Administrator, and the issue no longer occurs.
    Here's a link for instructions on how to activate the Vista Administrator account.
    Enable the (Hidden) Administrator Account on Windows Vista [The How-To Geek]
    I'm open and hopeful for a better solution, but for now I've got work to do, so I'm using Dreamweaver logged in as Administrator.

  • ORA-27086: unable to lock file over NFS -- but it's NOT Netapp!

    My 10.2 database crashed, and when it came back I got the following error:
    ORA-00202: control file: '/local/opt/oracle/product/10.2.0/dbs/lkFOOBAR'
    ORA-27086: unable to lock file - already in use
    Linux-x86_64 Error: 11: Resource temporarily unavailable
    This is a classic symptom of a Netapp problem, which likes to hold file locks open on NFS mounts. There is a standard procedure for clearing those locks; see, for instance, document 429912.1 on Metalink.
    Unfortunately, my files are mounted on an Isilon, one of Netapp's twisted cousins. I can find no references to "isilon" on Metalink, and we are at a loss how to resolve this.
    My sysadmin assures me that "there are no locks on the Isilon". But I know this cannot be the case, because if I do the following:
    1. delete the lockfile /local/opt/oracle/product/10.2.0/dbs/lkFOOBAR, and then
    2. move my controlfiles aside, and then copy them back into place,
    then the database will mount. However, it will not open, because now all the datafiles have locks.
    Is there anyone with experience in clearing NFS locks? I know this is more of a SA task than DBA, but I am sure my SA has overlooked something.
    Thanks

    New information:
    As stated above, I moved the controlfiles aside and then copied them back into place, like this:
    mv control01.ctl control01-bak.ctl
    cp control01-bak.ctl control01.ctlDid that for each controlfile, and then the database mounted.
    But, after rebooting the machine, we discovered that all locks were back in place-- it looks like the system is locking the files on boot-up, and not letting them go. The lock is held by PID 1, which is init.
    sculkget: lock held by PID: 1This is definitely looking like a major system issue, and not a DBA issue, and hence I have little right to expect assistance in this forum. But nonetheless I lay my situation out here before you all in case someone else recognizes my problem before the server bursts into flames!
    The system is CentOS 4.5-- not my choice, but that's the way it is.

  • Bit locker security issues (easy to crack) disk encryption?

    Bit locker security issues (easy to crack) disk encryption?
    Problem 1: When the PC run I think its too easy to get  malicious users (with usb pendrive) or spyware to get the encryption key (fast and easy)
    youtube.com/watch?v=0npTlOq6q_0
    Problem2:not resistant with bruteforce attacks
    youtube.com/watch?v=zvaJxnvbGic
    Problem 3: not resistant with boot hacking
    Im using DriveCrypt plus pack and searched security issues in bit locker.The bit locker allow you the bruteforce/dic attack easy.I think  It would be much safer 1. (I think the keys stored somewhere that is easily read) 2. Do not just be enough password
    need a password+file combination to decrypt the disk. DriveCrypt plus pack use a file+password combination if you know the password but you wont have the file you can not decrypt the disk (protect with bruteforce attack).On system boot protected bruteforce
    attak you can crash the (boot).If the boot system crash you can not decrypt the disk just the password you need the file+password combination plus to decrypt it. I am not a programmer but I see the BitLocker ( easy security catches to crack the disk encryption).Im
    tested DriveCrypt and I can not get the key that easy (Problem 1). I have not tested it in greater depth just trying to (catches to crack software encryption).

    Where is your question, sir?
    If the question were "is it easy to crack", the answer is "no". Your videos make use of several assumptions and ingredients and permissions that a normal attacker does not have.
    "Problem 3" is not clear, please describe what scenario you are talking about.

  • Can't get Firefox to load at all after trying fixes from support web site. Have checked for lock file, processes running, reboot, reinstall. NO JOY.

    I'm running Vista for operating system on an HP laptop that's about 2 years old. I've installed all current updates.
    I've always used Firefox. It started crashing and creating processes but not launching. Went to support and scoped it out -- there was a lock file my profile directory. I deleted it, and Firefox started loading.
    Used it a few times -- closed the app each time on exist as per suggestions on support site info. One time -- back to square one, wouldn't load, just created a process. Reboot, ending process, checking for lock file, reinstalling -- all unsucessful.

    Brian
    Below is from using a SIP build.  It does offer G722, but it's way down on the list so it's never used...
    m=audio 32678 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 102 9 116 101
    a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
    a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
    a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
    a=fmtp:18 annexb=no
    a=rtpmap:102 L16/16000
    a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000
    a=rtpmap:116 iLBC/8000
    a=fmtp:116 mode=20
    a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
    Taking Sreekanth's suggestion to try a Skinny build, I get the following when I make a call.  It offers codecs in the order I SET THEM AND ONLY THE CODECS I SET!  YAY!
    m=audio 19374 RTP/AVP 9 0 101
    a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000
    a=fmtp:9 bitrate=64
    a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
    a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
    Using a Skinny build on the phones also solved other issues.  The phones use G711 when the whole path supports G711 and G722 when the whole path supports G722.  It doesn't always use G722 and rely on transcoding for the call paths that can't use it.  It's fantastic..  The phones also receive the QoS tagging that I set and that seems to result in better audio quality than on the SIP builds, which never did get those settings.  Finally, it even solved a slow Exchange 2013 answer issue I have been experiencing for quite some time.  I practically fell out of my chair when I saw everything that was fixed just by switching...
    Cisco, PLEASE FIX YOUR SIP BUILDS!  It's insane how the SCCP builds work perfectly and the SIP builds don't, especially with how much these phones cost..  I was thinking of possibly acquiring some 9951s, which are SIP only.  I'm a little leery about that at this point.  If they have the same kinds of issues as the SIP builds for the 7975g, there's no SCCP alternative to use..
    Sreekanth
    Thank you for suggesting a Skinny build..  That was about the only thing I didn't try.  I am happy beyond belief that this is working so well now, even though the SIP builds should be just as well developed as the SCCP ones.

  • Excel 2013 - Locked file when trying to save

    After a user opens an excel file from a personal network share (EMC/ISILON storage) and make changes to the file, the user get a FILE LOCKED BY <USER> (Same user that is currently editing the file).
    We have also had issues where a user goes to open a file and it says it is currently in use by <USER> same user trying to open the file.
    Couple of notes of interest:
    These files are on personal network shares, only the 1 user has access to the files
    We have had the user completely reboot their machine when they try to open a file and get the file is locked message - Same message
    Does not happen with any other Office 2013 application
    Are there any special "quick View" features in Excel 2013 or Windows 7 that may be locking the file?  I have seen reference to this in older versions of Windows, but nothing for Windows 7.
    Thanks for the help.

    Hi TE2011,
    In regarding of the issue, please provide us more information to assist you better.
    Did this issue only occur with the special user? Or some others had the same issue.
    Did the issue only the special file?
    This issue may be caused by some factors, please try the following methods and check they are helpful:
    Method one:
    Turn off the Preview Pane, Details Pane and pop ups that show information about file and desktop items
    1. Right click on the Start Button.
    2. Click 'Open Windows Explorer'.
    3. At the top left click Organize > Layout 
    4. Uncheck Details Pane and Preview Pane.
    5. On a Windows menu, click on Tools > Folder Options.  In the box that opens up, click on the View tab.  Scroll down the list to
    “Show pop-up description for folder and desktop items” and clear the checkbox and then click OK. 
    In Excel:
    1. Click File > Open
    2. Click Organize > Layout
    3. Uncheck 'Details Pane' and 'Preview Pane'
    Reference:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/the_microsoft_excel_support_team_blog/archive/2012/05/14/the-definitive-locked-file-post.aspx
    We also try the other methods provided with the blog.
    Method Two:
    The issue also may be caused by the file itself, please try to recreated it and add it to trusted location.
    If this issue still exists, please try to upload the screenshot about the error message. I'll appreciate for it.
    Hope it's helpful.
    Regards,
    George Zhao
    Forum Support
    Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click "[email protected]"

Maybe you are looking for

  • ITouch 'sync' - household power failure - iTunes prob

    My iTouch was trying to sync before a household power failure and the computer teellback states 'This iPod cannot be used because the Apple Mobile Device Sertvice is not started'

  • Cannot submit batch... Error message! please Help

    Hi, I'm trying to encode a short clip using Compressor, and each time I hit the Submit button I get this message : "Cannot Submit Batch - Unable to connect to background process" why? can anybody help on this please?

  • How to get mail prefs and emails to another Mac?

    Hi, How do I take all my accounts and emails to another Mac? Just copying the ~/library/mail folder doesn't copy the account data. When I copy that folder to another Mac, Mail does not recognize the account data.

  • Need help understanding component id values in a region

    Hi, I have an adf region that is assigned the id of r1. The region uses a .jsff that has various UI components, for example a commandButton assigned the id of cb1. I'm trying to understand how ADF creates the id for the button that's rendered. For ex

  • [RFC][Authorization] Prevent Dump on RFC Call

    Hi, I would like to have a tool to check consistencies throughout different SAP systems for a given user. For this, I call the Bapi called 'BAPI_USER_GET_DETAIL'. The problem is that, depending RFC user defined in SM59, it may end by a DUMP. Thus, is