Weird Version Info in WebAccess after 14.0.2

Hi,
I installed "gw14.0.2-120664_full_linux_multi" and I am seeing weird
Version Information in the Info Dialog of WebAcess:
Code:
---------...

You can use:
*http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest/win32/

Similar Messages

I am having problems launching the standalone version of Lightroom 6 after I have gone through the install and activation process? Lightroom starts to open but "hangs" before any photos in the catalgue are displayed. I have contacted the chat support twic

I am having problems launching the standalone version of Lightroom 6 after I have gone through the install and activation process? Lightroom starts to open but "hangs" before any photos in the catalgue are displayed. I have contacted the chat support twice but they have not been able to fix the problem.

I went through the activation process yesterday and shut down my PC when I went to bed last evening. When I got up this morning and turned my PC on and then started Lightrom 6 (I upgraded from version 5) it started to launch but then just hung and became "not responsive". I I then uninstalled and then reinstalled the product today but the same thing happened. What is weird is that when I install from the standalone file I downloaded when I purchased the upgrade it looks like it's downloading the software again over the Internet? I have been having these problems for the last four or five days. I have contacted the chat support folks twice and they were able to get it working but whatever they did did not last as the problem reappeared again once the PC was shut down and then started up again.

File version info

I would like to find a way to get the file version info of an exe. I have tried the file info from openG but it does not get the version info. I looked on the MS website and found the .NET function called file version info that is supposed to be under system diagnostics but when I bring up the constuctor node it does not show up . Everything else that is supposed to be in there shows up. I want this info so that I can create a generic about dialog box for my exe. If anyone knows of an easier way to do this I would appreciate any answer.
PS I used the application builder to set the version Info..
Using LV 8.0
Joe.
"NOTHING IS EVER EASY"

Jarrod S. wrote:
Hi Rolf,
Thanks for your
help with the VarFileInfo\Translation resource. I realized this was a
hole in the programs functionality, and I knew a workaround, but I was
never sure how valid the workaround was. Defaulting to the English
language code does sound like a good idea. It definitely works for
LabVIEW.exe. I never bothered implementing this since this was designed
for LabVIEW-built exes, not LabVIEW itself. LabVIEW-built exes do
contain the VarFileInfo\Translation resource. I also built this in
LabVIEW 8, since that was the first version that allowed users to
specify executable versions and other info for their applications. But
it is nice as a general tool!
Hmm, thinking about
it there is possibly one more improvement. If the default english
language does not provide any string resources another possibility
might be to retrieve the current language codes from the user settings
and try with them too. But this sounds quite academical as I can't
imagine an installer manipulating the version resource of an executable
according to the currently set user language. I will have to
investigate a little more what the issue is with files not containing
any translation keys.
As to manipulating the version resource of LabVIEW executables I have
made some code too for this in the past for earlier LabVIEW versions
but found that manipulating the exe part of an executable in any way
after it has been built into an application renders the executable
unusable to run as there needs also to be some modifications at the end
of the file to point to the start of the embedded LLB in the
executable, so that was why I haven't made a tool of this yet. Glad to
see that LabVIEW 8 finally has support for adding a proper version
resource to the executable.
Rolf Kalbermatter
Rolf Kalbermatter
CIT Engineering Netherlands
a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

All deployments reporting 'CI Version Info timed out'

Hi guys,
I've had a recent development where all deployment monitoring is reporting 0% success all of a sudden.
Everything was working fine up until a few weeks ago, then I came in one morning and noticed all of my deployments were now reporting varying percentage of errors. Over time the success percent went all the way down to 0% for almost all deployments.
However, the actual deployments themselves are successful. As in the software is installed and logs report success.
Using the 'Application Infrastructure Errors' report, they are all now reporting 'CI Version Info Timed out'.
I've followed so many threads on here suggesting redeployment, updating content, updating memberships of collections etc. I've had no luck at all.
If I look on an example client I see the DCMReporting log has a few errors of 'Failed to resolve version for scope xxxxxxxxx' and the CIDownloader log reports 'Failed to delete Instance Policy xxxxxx'
I haven't made any infrastructure changes to the actual SCCM build in quite a while, though I did restart the server recently.
Any help is greatly appreciated!

Just wanted to leave an update for any future Google'rs.
I may have resolved the issue, I'm just now waiting but after an hour the success rates are climbing back up across the board. After looking through all of the CIxxxxxx.log files and identifying the applications reporting the xxxx - version not found, I
completely removed those apps and re-added them.
This seemed to work so far.
Even though I had previously done this and failed, there was actually multiple apps with this issue. So I had previously done this for 1-2 apps, and the issue still reoccured, which made me incorrectly assume that this wasn't related to the problem. Following
it through I readded another 2 applications and started to see the log files clear and the success rates rise.
Still no call as to what caused it?
For those experiencing this, check your CIAgent.log for the following (taken from the linked post)
CIAgent.log
(The prod version of this app is "12", below you can see the TS was still using version "10"
CIAgentJob({BB81C59E-0D68-4F80-8C26-F3672FDA6993}):
CAgentJob::VersionInfoTimedOut for ModelName
ScopeId_FBAD85CC-8425-4A82-9A2A-A69D6941A909/RequiredApplication_826f927c-b7b4-446b-9767-9e03529677ff, version
10 not available.
CCIInfo::SetError - Setting CI level error to (0x87d00314).
<- this repeated many times
VersionInfo ModelName=ScopeId_FBAD85CC-8425-4A82-9A2A-A69D6941A909/RequiredApplication_826f927c-b7b4-446b-9767-9e03529677ff,
Version=10, IsVersionSpecific=TRUE timed out
I then used the following powershell command to generate a list of Display names and UID's:
Get-CMDeployment | select SoftwareName, ModelName |Out-GridView
and just manually found the matching UID.
I then just manually removed all deployments and then the deployment type. Simply readded the deployment type and redeployed.
Hours later and seems to be on the mend. Hopefully by tomorrow everything will be back to normal.
Note: We did have a UPS failure a few weeks ago that took out power to the ESX cluster. I can't confirm for sure that this was related but it seems to have happened around the same time...

I am using iphone 3gs and have accidentally clicked "update" to software version 5. However, after I failed and all my data was lost. I manage to restore back to my previous situation. But all my apps has been gone. How can I get back all my aps?

I am using iphone 3gs and have accidentally clicked "update" to software version 5. However, after I failed and all my data was lost. I manage to restore back to my previous situation. But all my apps has been gone. How can I get back all my aps? I know I can get it by itunes but there are a few problems as below:
1. I have jailed break my iphone and I never purchased any apps from itunes
2. I have some important infomation saved in one of the apps called "awesome notes". How can I get it back? Is it store inside my computer? if so, how can i restore?
3. I am using window 7
I sincerely hope you guys can help me.
Regards,
Stephen Hong

alrite. I have made my mistake. I should not jail break my iphone. So if I purchase my apps again from itunes is that mean mean my data will be back?
I hope you guys can giv me some support here since I am Apple genuine buyer. I could be wrong last time and now I turn over a new leaf and learn a lesson.
Please noted that I can always create new account to ask for the same questions without mention about "jailbreak" if I want to but obviously I won't do that. Please provide me your support! Thank you!

How can I go back to the optimized version of the photo after I have viewed it on my iPad?

Hello,
The reason why I chose the iCloud services (I'm on a 200GB plan), is that I wanted to be able to have on-demand access to my photo library and view my pictures, without having to store them on the device itself.
Now It seems like every time I access a picture that is stored on the cloud from my iPad, the original full resolution version of it is downloaded on my device and it stays there. This can cause my iPad's storage to be full by only viewing a few of the albums that I have stored on the iCloud!
There must be a way to go back to the optimized version of the photo after you've viewed them on your device. Can anyone please help me with that?
Thanks very much!

https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Using+the+Adobe+Reader+plugin+with+Firefox
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Opening+PDF+files+within+Firefox

[Developer] How to RELIABLY get Acrobat Reader Version info from registry

(Using Wise Installation system 9.02)
First, we get the path from here:
SOFTWARE\Classes\SOFTWARE\Adobe\Acrobat\Exe
if it is not found, we get it from here:
SOFTWARE\Classes\Applications\AcroRD32.exe\shell\Read\command
and if it is still not found, we get it from here:
SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths\AcroRd32.exe
Then we check the version info for the file AcroRd32.exe that is
located in one of those directories and compare it to the version
we are installing; if it is less, we install the version included
in our setup package.
Now, is this the most RELIABLE way to do this?
Should we just search for the file and get it's version info?
What if you have > 1 version of Reader installed?
What if you have Full Acrobat installed?
Is there also a way for Reader installation to NOT change the
PDF file association from Full Acrobat?

If you look at our current process, you'll see that we are checking
for multiple versions. However, there have been times when our version
installed over a later version and we cannot understand why this
happened that is why I'm addressing this here to see if anyone had
any "fool-proof" way to do it.
I know I can also check the PDF association but it may be set to Acrobat
and we do not want to modify that. We just want to check the latest
version of Reader they have installed against the one we have in our
package.

Trying 2 download new version of Firefox and after being prompted 2 drag Firefox icon into Applications folder, get message that task can't b completed bc Firefox is in use, but only use am making of Firefox is 2 have it open 2 download new version

Trying 2 download new version of Firefox and after being prompted 2 drag Firefox icon into Applications folder, get message that task can't b completed bc Firefox is in use, but only use am making of Firefox is 2 have it open 2 download new version

If there are problems with updating or with the permissions then easiest is to download the full version and trash the currently installed version to do a clean install of the new version.
Download a new copy of the Firefox program and save the disk image (dmg) file to the desktop
* Firefox 7.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
* Trash the current Firefox application to do a clean (re-)install
* Install the new version that you have downloaded
Your profile data is stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder, so you won't lose your bookmarks and other personal data if you uninstall and (re)install Firefox.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox

QI Info record created after PO....

Dear ALl,
QI info record created after PO for the material. SO i wan to know whether system will give error in this case?
Regards,
Kaushal Rai

Dear Shyamal,
There is no ponit of date. Its correct that PO will not be created for that material which is having procurement key active.
PO created before or after QI record doesn't matter. Only thing QI info record should be there at the time of creation of PO.
But i don't know why in PO still I am getting the same error even after creation QI record. Material, Vendor, Plant, PR all are same.
Regards,
Kaushal Rai

Target setting / version info

Hello,
when releasing a new version of a software I usually update the 'version info' dialog in the target settings. I just realized that these settings are different for debug and release mode... why is it so? One is going to distribute the release version, not the debug version, so why are there two separate entries one has to maintain? Typically, I am running the debug mode, and only at the very end I switch to relase mode. Hence typically I adapt the settings in the debug mode (year, major/minor release number) - so far I had assumed that this is the identical version info as for the release mode, but no...
Wolfgang
Solved!
Go to Solution.

1) The history of this is as follows:
a) From the beginning of CVI, there was always a version number which applied to all binaries that you created. There were no configurations then. Also, there was no such thing as auto-increment. Users would have to explicitly set the version number to whatever they wanted.
b) Some time later, the notion of separate release and debug configurations was introduced. The version info, along with almost all other options, applied to both configurations. There was still no auto-increment.
c) Then, auto-increment was added. When auto-increment is enabled, the simple act of building your project would change the version number. But because the version number was shared accross configurations, and it didn't make sense for debug builds to "interfere" with the release build number, auto-increment was only enforced in release builds -- hence that sentence in the help.
d) The 64-bit configurations then came along. This simply increased the number of configurations from 2 to 4 but had no meaningful impact on this issue.
e) Custom configurations were introduced in CVI 2010. This required most global options to become configuration-specific. We added a note to the readme alerting users to be careful when editing these options, since they were no longer changing all configurations, but just the current configuration. This change also applied to the version field, which could now be different between debug and release builds. At this time, we could have allowed auto-increment to work for debug builds too, since it would no longer interfere with the release version number, but for the sake of not changing existing behavior unless it was absolutely necessary, we decided to continue not supporting auto-increment for debug builds. Users can still change their debug version number to whatever they chose, but it continues not incrementing with each build.
2) This is what I was talking about earlier when I was explaining the purpose of dimming. The values are different, but CVI can only show one, hence it picks one, and dims the value text -- as a visual indicator that it's not the same value for all configurations. Just like in the example of the numeric controls that I gave earlier. This only affects what you see when you first display the dialog. You can still change it, and the change will apply to all configurations.
3) This is probably happening because the name of your program, under the 64-bit configuration, is still MyEarlierProgram. In the Target Settings dialog, cycle through the configuration ring while looking at the application file name. Is it really the same for all configurations? If it's not, then you'd expect %basename (and %filename) to appear differently when you preview the Version Info dialog. %basename is not version-dependent, as you said. It's configuration-dependent.
Luis

How to get rid of webutil version info?

I created a form to test reading and writing files on the client using webutil. (forms 11.1.1.4) which is something I need for my
forms6i -- forms11 conversion.
But it has an issue which is when the form starts it prints out a screen with webutil version info on it. (Webutil Information) .
I see this stuff is on the webutil_canvas. That's interesting but I don't need that in the form. That would confuse the users.
Unfortunately if I open this canvas I get:
"Frm-13008 Cannot find javabean with name oracle.forms.webutil.ole.Olefunctions"
oh oh. That doesn't sound good...
but anyway how do I best get rid of it showing this screen?
I thought I was following instructions correctly for subclassing the object library in my test form. (famous last words.)

Oh never mind I found it.
It does not work to change the webutil_canvas to NOT raise_on_entry. But it does work to put a block before the webutil block.
It seems that if webutil is the first block it has the ability to raise that canvas no matter what but I don't know how it does it.

I purchased my daughter the new ipod. I downloaded the latest version of itunes and after syncing the new ipod, I was unable to get the majority of my songs. They all appear with an exclamation point. Even the ones purchased on itunes. Why?

I purchased my daughter the new ipod. I downloaded the latest version of itunes. After syncing the ipod, all my songs appear grayed out. They have an exclamation point next to them. Even the ones I purchased from itunes. How do I get my songs back?

Usually, the exclamation mark tells you that the song was not where the program expected to find it. It may also mean that there was an error with the file itself.
   If you click on the exclamation mark, it may give you a reason. You can also double click the file to make it play. If the file is not found, it will tell you. Just follow the prompts to look for the song again. It will ask you if you want to look for the other missing songs in the same folder. You can do it, but unfortunately, the last few updates have made the program blind to the songs that are there and you sometimes have to do the same process for each song.
   If neither of these help, I would suggest starting from scratch and reinstalling iTunes. I have had to do that before. Do your best to back up the library and such first.
   Sometimes a computer will rename a hard disk (Windows) and all the songs on that disk will be gone to iTunes because it will think it's looking in the right place. It can't recognize that the hard disk or partition has been renamed.
I know that this is a podcast, but the principle is the same. A dialogue box should pop up to tell you just what the problem is.
   I hope this helps!

Can i revert back to version 3.6.15 after installing ff 4 without losing anything thats been saved

can i revert back to version 3.6.15 after installing ff 4 without losing

If you follow the instructions I gave it does not delete the profile folder where the user data such as bookmarks are stored. When you install the earlier version it will use the same profile data so you do not lose your user data.

Anyone provide accurate info on why after 1 yr, after guarantee period expiry the DVD player on our I mac running Intel core duo processor with OS 10.6.8 refuses to run DVDs? CDs run

Can anyone provide accurate info on why after 1 yr, ( just after guarantee period expiry) the DVD player on our I mac running Intel core duo processor with OS 10.6.8 refuses to run DVDs?
CDs run without problem and until recently the DVD we have (all original no pirated copies) ran; we have used a CD cleaner disc to no avail.

Welcome to the Apple boards:
I suggest an erase and install and use your backup for any important files you have.
Did you perform a disk check/repair and permissions repair and a PRAM zap before updating? While not required, they are usually necessary to avoid issues.
There are so many reasons for a bad install, that it is impossible to list them all.
Out-of-date software, drivers, etc, haxies, and other software can cause problems.
My three updates were without incident, so it is possible for a perfect update, but unless you supply us with details about your previous system, programs, apps, drivers, etc., it is not possible to figure out what happened.
Again, whenever installing an update to an OS, a clone or other full backup is absolutely necessary, as reading the posts on this board indicate.

I have a PC and need to download an older version of Lighroom (3) after my computer crashed. I have my serial number. What do I need to do?

I have a PC and need to download an older version of Lighroom (3) after my computer crashed. I have my serial number. What do I need to do?

Adobe - Lightroom : For Windows
Mylenium

Weird Version Info in WebAccess after 14.0.2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for