Westell 7500 Traffic Shaping

Can anyone tell me how to limit the bandwidth to certain computers connected to the router? (Preferably Wireless)
My cousin lives with us and he hogs up all the bandwidth streaming videos and I only have DSL
Help.....

Kage wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to limit the bandwidth to certain computers connected to the router? (Preferably Wireless)
My cousin lives with us and he hogs up all the bandwidth streaming videos and I only have DSL
Help.....
Kage,
You can mess with the QoS settings in the Advanced section of your Westell 7500. You can prioritize the traffic based on IP so that you can maintain a certain amount of bandwidth at all times.
Regards,
Chris
Christian
Verizon Telecom
Fiber Solution Center
Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supercede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or Plan.

Similar Messages

Traffic shaping G723 traffic between 2 companies

Hi,
Can someone put me on the right way to implement traffic shaping (QoS) for G723 traffic.
Situation:
Two companies connected to each other with a vpn tunnel. The hardware is Cisco 2621xm at the sublocation and on the hq location is an 2651XM.
There is an GRE tunnel configured between the two sites. The GRE tunnel is up and working.
On both sites there is an telephony system that can use G723 anr/or G711. Both telephony systems are connected to each other.
Voice is working, but now we want to implement QoS for the VOIP connection.
Has someone suggestions for me ?

Hi,
Appy a policy-map with the desired QoS policy to the tunnel interface.
First of all, issue 'qos pre-classify' on the the tunnel itself, otherwise the congestion management mechanism will be useless.
Cheers,
Gabriel

Traffic Shaping - can't get it to work

Hi
I’m attempting to create a basic traffic shaping policy in a lab environment but I can’t seem to get it to limit the download rate?
I can successfully achieve this with policing. I am testing the speed restriction using a broadband speed testing website, policing is clearly impacting the download rate, this is not the case with shaping. Please see below the shaping and policing policies, which I am attaching in turn to the vlan1 interface outbound.
Further I have messed around with the below shaping policy and set a fixed cir as in the policing policy but it still has no impact on the download speed.
Finally class SLOW_PC under PM POLICE matches an ACL matching traffic to and from a particular IP address. The speedlimiter is matching all traffic
Policy Map speedlimiter(Shaping)
    Class class-default
      Average Rate Traffic Shaping
     cir 1%
Policy Map POLICE
    Class SLOW_PC
     police cir 1048500 bc 32765
       conform-action transmit
       exceed-action drop
any help appreciated

Shaping and policing can both can be used for outbound traffic on an interface, but only policing can be used for inbound traffic. If you're trying to use shaping (which works by managing the queue) on inbound traffic (which has no manageable queue) it will have no effect. Policing is the only option in this case.

Can Anyone Help Me Configure My Verizon (D-Link) DSL-2750B "Traffic Shaping" (QoS)?

Well ... I just spent a wonderful hour and a half (not) bouncing around VZ technical support, etc. trying to get assistance regarding configuring my DSL router.* Between the low-quality Skype connection to India and my lack of success, I'm a little bummed out right now.
Could one of you perhaps help me? I'm trying to configure a single, wire-attached network node (port 4 of the router) so that it can only consume up to 320 Kbps of my 750 Kbps (7.5 Mbps) DSL bandwidth ... no matter what. This results from this node consuming virtually all of the circuit's bandwidth when streaming or during bulk file transfers.
I have tried to remedy the problem using priority with no discernible impact.
The Quality of Service (QoS) element called Traffic Shaping (Services | QoS | Traffic Shaping), described on Page 51 of the VZ DSL-2750B User Manual , appears to be the ideal solution to my problem. Repeated attempts at activating this QoS have all resulted in no throttling of bandwidth consumption.
My most recent attempt was to define the device on Port 4 as the DMZ host ... and then apply a new rule (320 TX, 320 RX) to this interface. Again, no joy.
Does anyone have any experience with this service on this router?
Am I chasing my tail trying to configure the router without validating that my circuit is not configured with "Fastpath (PSE) inactive"?
If the circuit configuration is a potential problem, which office should I ask for at VZ customer service?
Here is the information from the System page of the Router Control Panel:
Gateway ID: PX2M1BC000000
Software Version: 5.4.12.1.44
Release Date: Feb 19 2012
Platform: D-Link DSL-2750B
Board Tag:... Ntag-5_4_12_1_44
Compilation Flags:... LIC=/home/bat/bat/dlink_bcm96328_5_4_12_1/20120219_1343/conf/jpkg_bcm9636x_dlink.lic CONFIG_RG_PROD_IMG=y DIST=DLINK_DSL2750B
I'll note that the Router provides a notification that "RX QOS might not operate when Fastpath (PSE) is active" when I update the router configuration page concerning Traffic Shaping. Because Fastpath is not mentioned in the User Manual, I'm guessing that Fastpath (PSE) might be a configurable attribute of the circuit servicing my PoP, but I have no idea if this is the case.
I searched for relevant messages on this board ... without success. If this has already been addressed, please provide a link, and accept my apologies. (My Google-Fu tends to be weak.)

The asterisk in the first post refers to the following summary of events:
10:40 - Attempt to solve my configuration question using VZ chat begins.
10:49 - VZ chat agent Danish refers me to phone support. (Chat ID number is 020813176471 if you're with VZ and are interested.)
10:50 - Call VZ phone support.
11:02 - Talk with Angel. Because she has not heard of, nor received training in, "traffic shaping," she says my question about configuring this VZ DSL modem must be addressed by "Premium Technical Support." She transfers me.
11:13 - Talk with Pamela. Premium Technical Support only responds to questions about 3d party products. Because my question concerns a VZ DSL modem, Basic Technical Support is responsible. She transfers me.
11:17 - Talk with Joe. He says either the vendor (D-Link) or premium technical support is required. Because I had already tried with D-Link (they referred me to Verizon, as this modem was built exclusively for VZ), I explained what I had already experienced, and described how I wanted "assistance configuring my VZ DSL modem, specifically a feature described on page 51 of the User Manual." He transfers me.
11:23 - The automated phone system asks for my 12-digit customer ID. I wasn't able to find it fast enough, and rolled through to Financial Services. Eventually Trig picked up, listened to my story, and transferred me to "Technical Support" providing the direct dial number, just in case (866.945.79xx).
11:32 - Entered the phone queue. Lots of hissing and clicks.
11:35 - Talk with Monika. (The voice clarity from this point onward was on the order of 1st-generation Skype. Between the horrible language problem -- Monika is in India don'cha know -- and the lousy line quality, this was the most frustrating.) No matter what I said, I couldn't convey the reason for my call. I asked to talk with a supervisor, which Monika related was not possible. She also related that she could not transfer me to an American POC or supervisor.
12:01 - Hung up the phone ... and started down the path that led to my post immediately above.
I was repeatedly queried about the account name and number throughout the process. Conveying this information was especially challenging during the Indian call segment.

How to use a Westell 7500 as a router-switch ?

I have an extra Verizon Westell 7500 DSL modem router (A90-750015-07). How do I turn it into a router-switch that will take an ethernet (not DSL) network feed (with internet access) and distribute it among a few devices and put those devices into some kind of sub-network so they see each other? I'm not using technical terms here - please teach me.
My wife is going to rent a small temporary office that provides internet access via a socket in the wall. Let's assume it's a typical RJ-45 ethernet socket. The internet speed might actually be pretty good - maybe 30Mbs down and very fast up. The total internet capacity is shared with other temporary offices in the facility, but let's assume we'll have enough for our needs.
If the only thing I bring is a single computer, I could use a J-45 ethernet cable to plug its network card directly into this socket and be done. But I'll be bringing at least two computers and a small printer/scanner. Both computers will need to share the internet access, and both computers and the printer/scanner will need to "see" each other. (Just like at home.)
So, if I plug the extra Westell 7500 into the network wall socket and then my PCs and printer into the Westell, I should get what I need here, yes? How do I do this exactly, step-by-step?
I have experimented at home and have maybe 10% success. At home, I don't have an ethernet socket in the wall, but I do have my current (not Westell) modem-router, and it has an unused LAN socket, which I am pretending is the office's ethernet socket. I connected a test computer to the Westell 7500 and logged onto the Westell 7500's embedded server (192.168.1.1), changed its VersaPort from "LAN ethernet port" to "WAN uplink port", connected the newer modem-router's unused LAN socket to the Westell 7500's E1/Uplink socket with a J45 cable, went to the Westell 7500's "Advanced" page and ran "Detect WAN Configuration". That changed the Westell 7500's "WAN uplink port Settings Protocal" from PPPoE to Routed IP. The Westell 7500 now also says its "Broadband Connection Type" is "Routed Bridge".
The test computer connected to the Westell 7500 shows it is connected to the Westell 7500, but it cannot connect all the way through to the internet. At the start, the newer modem-router shows the Westell is connected to it, and the newer modem-router has given the Westell a DHCP address of 192.168.1.5. But after a few minutes, the newer modem-router doesn't show the Westell any more. If I re-run Detect WAN Configuration on the Westell 7500, it says "Automatic Protocol Detecion is in progress" but then "DHCP server was found ... PPPoE server not found", and then the newer modem-router shows the Westell 7500 again as 192.168.1.5. But the test computer does not have internet access.
What exactly should I do with the additional settings in the Westell 7500 to make this work?
If there's a great web site to explain this to me, please point me there.
Thanks.

The answer is at
http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-1856344/convert-westell-7500-router-switch.html#11803251
and the links in that post.

Problems with Westell 7500 Gateway

Hi guys I have a problem with a westell 7500 series wireless gateway. Having recently upgraded to the gateway from an old 6100 series modem, I am having some issues keeping computers synced with the gateway. Every time I restart my computer connected to the ethernet portion of the gateway, I must re-enter my default gateway on my computer's ipv4 settings. I have dedicated ip's set up for every computer on the network and all of them have problems recognizing the gateway. Even setting the ipv4 to autodetect the settings, it locks me out of the internet saying it is a public network. I have verified all my settings in the gateway and it is set up for private connections only. Any help that someone could give would be appreciated. Thanks

When you are online, is an IP Address on computer the same IP Address that is on http://www.whatismyip.com/ ?
If you are the original poster (OP) and your issue is solved, please remember to click the "Solution?" button so that others can more easily find it. If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the "Kudos" button.

Traffic Shaping for perticular traffic

class-map match-any SYSLOG-CMAP
match access-group name SYSLOG-ACL
policy-map SYSLOG-PMAP
class SYSLOG-CMAP
shape average 250000
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip flow ingress
load-interval 30
duplex full
speed 100
service-policy output SYSLOG-PMAP
Router1#show policy-map int GigabitEthernet0/1
GigabitEthernet0/1
Service-policy output: SYSLOG-PMAP
    Class-map: SYSLOG-CMAP (match-any)
      712495474 packets, 394564809213 bytes
      30 second offered rate 41000 bps, drop rate 23000 bps
      Match: access-group name SYS-LOG-ACL
        712495474 packets, 394564809696 bytes
        30 second rate 41000 bps
      Queueing
      queue limit 64 packets
      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/152567902/0
      (pkts output/bytes output) 559927554/295263742429
      shape (average) cir 250000, bc 1000, be 1000
      target shape rate 250000
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
      3774914087 packets, 1413482437872 bytes
      30 second offered rate 2796000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
      Match: any
      queue limit 64 packets
      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/19837/0
      (pkts output/bytes output) 3817743535/1477901813111
=====================================================
Hi everyone,
In the above configuration, I configured traffic shaping to shape the syslog traffic to certain limit. My question is, Can I apply traffic shaping to perticular traffic ? What will happen to the remaining traffic ? We have ethernet hand-of to provider but total bandwidth we can use is 8M, which is controlled by ISP. We just send all the traffic without any shaping.
Thanks

Traffic shaping only works from the source. there is no way (other than policing - i.e., discard) to shape through the cloud.
If you tried to pace the traffic through the cloud, it's got to be buffered somewhere, causing latency, and ultimately discarded frames after the buffers fill.
Policing allows the traffic through until some threshold occurs (traditional frame = DE set at Bc, discard at Be), then the traffic is dropped.
FWIW
Scott

No Connectivity on line - rebooting Westell 7500 does not help

Hi All,
We've been having sync issues for well over 2 weeks now. Sometimes hard rebooting the Westell 7500 (Model:A90-750015-07 - firmware ver: 5.01.00.02) will allow the line to stay up for a day or so.
But since yesterday, nothing has helped. The line will come up and stay up for maybe 5-10minutes and then drop again.
Calling the VZ support line is very frustrating since the "robot" menus do not help to get us to actual support personnel. The one time we got past the automated system, the lady said we had reached the wrong dept. and dropped us back to the robot
I am working from home, so all of this is total time and monely loss. Currently a different internet connection helped to manage post this.
Anyway, here are some "all event" logs we could collect today - (we are in an apartment and do not have access to any NID).
cwmpd[338]:     CWMP: Final Http Return Code = 204
syslog:     WebServer: Page [/htmlV/wacpHidden.asp] Access by user administrator from IP 192.168.15.253
cwmpd[338]:     CWMP: Inform (200). The following events are true:1 BOOT,4 VALUE CHANGE
cwmpd[338]:     CWMP: SSL Status = SSL Connection Succeeded,TCP Status = TCP Connected,Authentication Type = Basic
cwmpd[338]:     CWMP: Inform Sent Successfully
daemon.err     cwmpd[368]:     cwmpDDNSCallback: Result of DDNS Update (ipupdate_once) ->3
syslog:     WebServer: Page [/htmlV/sys_system_log.asp] Access by user administrator from IP 192.168.15.253
syslog:     WebServer: Page [/goform/EventForm] Access by user administrator from IP 192.168.15.253
syslog:     WebServer: Page [/htmlV/sys_system_log.asp] Access by user administrator from IP 192.168.15.253
Apr 11 09:18:58     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:18:58     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     pppd[1838] EXIT_PPPOE_TIMEOUT_PADO caused InternetFail light to be lit
Apr 11 09:18:58     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     PPPD Exit Status changed EXIT_OK->EXIT_PPPOE_TIMEOUT_PADO during phase PHASE_SERIALCONN->PHASE_HOLDOFF
Apr 11 09:18:58     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_HOLDOFF(11)
Apr 11 09:18:58     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell Random Holdoff returning 445 seconds
Apr 11 09:18:58     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Leaving destroy_pppoesessionfile
Apr 11 09:18:58     daemon.err     pppd[1838]:     Unlinking PPPoE session file:/WFIO/ppp-config0
Apr 11 09:18:58     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Enter destroy_pppoesessionfile
Apr 11 09:18:58     daemon.err     pppd[1838]:     Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Apr 11 09:18:58     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Apr 11 09:18:58     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     waitForPADO: timed out
Apr 11 09:18:48     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     waitForPADO: timed out
Apr 11 09:18:43     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     waitForPADO: timed out
Apr 11 09:18:38     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:18:38     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     PPPD Exit Status changed EXIT_PPPOE_TIMEOUT_PADO->EXIT_OK during phase PHASE_DORMANT->PHASE_SERIALCONN
Apr 11 09:18:38     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_SERIALCONN(2)
Apr 11 09:18:38     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Wan link is up and PPPoE Terminator on DSL:nas1 is done working
Apr 11 09:18:38     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:18:38     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_DORMANT(3)
Apr 11 09:14:15     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:14:15     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     pppd[1838] EXIT_PPPOE_TIMEOUT_PADO caused InternetFail light to be lit
Apr 11 09:14:15     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     PPPD Exit Status changed EXIT_OK->EXIT_PPPOE_TIMEOUT_PADO during phase PHASE_SERIALCONN->PHASE_HOLDOFF
     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_HOLDOFF(11)
     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell Random Holdoff returning 263 seconds
     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Leaving destroy_pppoesessionfile
    daemon.err     pppd[1838]:     Unlinking PPPoE session file:/WFIO/ppp-config0
daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Enter destroy_pppoesessionfile
daemon.err     pppd[1838]:     Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Apr 11 09:14:15     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     waitForPADO: timed out
Apr 11 09:14:05     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     waitForPADO: timed out
Apr 11 09:14:00     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     waitForPADO: timed out
Apr 11 09:13:55     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:13:55     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     PPPD Exit Status changed EXIT_PPPOE_TIMEOUT_PADO->EXIT_OK during phase PHASE_DORMANT->PHASE_SERIALCONN
Apr 11 09:13:55     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_SERIALCONN(2)
Apr 11 09:13:55     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Wan link is up and PPPoE Terminator on DSL:nas1 is done working
Apr 11 09:13:55     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:13:55     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_DORMANT(3)
Apr 11 09:05:55     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:05:55     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     pppd[1838] EXIT_PPPOE_TIMEOUT_PADO caused InternetFail light to be lit
Apr 11 09:05:55     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     PPPD Exit Status changed EXIT_OK->EXIT_PPPOE_TIMEOUT_PADO during phase PHASE_SERIALCONN->PHASE_HOLDOFF
Apr 11 09:05:55     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_HOLDOFF(11)
Apr 11 09:05:55     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell Random Holdoff returning 480 seconds
Apr 11 09:05:55     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Leaving destroy_pppoesessionfile
Apr 11 09:05:55     daemon.err     pppd[1838]:     Unlinking PPPoE session file:/WFIO/ppp-config0
Apr 11 09:05:55     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Enter destroy_pppoesessionfile
Apr 11 09:05:55     daemon.err     pppd[1838]:     Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Apr 11 09:05:55     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Apr 11 09:05:55     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     waitForPADO: timed out
Apr 11 09:05:45     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     waitForPADO: timed out
Apr 11 09:05:40     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     waitForPADO: timed out
Apr 11 09:05:35     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:05:35     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     PPPD Exit Status changed EXIT_PEER_DEAD->EXIT_OK during phase PHASE_DORMANT->PHASE_SERIALCONN
Apr 11 09:05:35     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_SERIALCONN(2)
Apr 11 09:05:35     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Wan link is up and PPPoE Terminator on DSL:nas1 is done working
Apr 11 09:05:35     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:05:35     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_DORMANT(3)
Apr 11 09:04:09     daemon.err     cwmpd[367]:     ddnsWanIPCallback WAN State Down
Apr 11 09:04:07     daemon.notice     net_mgr[357]:     Routes transitioning to Down state on ppp0.
Apr 11 09:04:07     daemon.notice     net_mgr[357]:     QoS on ppp0 transitioning to Down state.
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_HOLDOFF(11)
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell Random Holdoff returning 91 seconds
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Leaving destroy_pppoesessionfile
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.err     pppd[1838]:     Unlinking PPPoE session file:/WFIO/ppp-config0
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Enter destroy_pppoesessionfile
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_DISCONNECT(10)
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.info     pppd[1838]:     Sent 287346 bytes,received 544123 bytes.
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.info     pppd[1838]:     Connect time 5930402.2 minutes.
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Connection terminated.
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 ifnamepp0 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     pppd[1838] EXIT_PEER_DEAD caused InternetFail light to be lit
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     PPPD Exit Status changed EXIT_OK->EXIT_PEER_DEAD during phase PHASE_ESTABLISH->PHASE_DEAD
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_DEAD(0)
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.info     dnsmasq[311]:     using nameserver 71.250.0.12#53
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.info     dnsmasq[311]:     using nameserver 71.242.0.12#53
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.info     dnsmasq[311]:     reading /var/etc/resolv.conf
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     ip-down[2062]:     ppp0: 287346 bytes sent,544123 bytes received
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     ip-down[2062]:     ppp0: disconnected;connected for 355824129 seconds
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Couldn t increase MRU to 1500
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.warn     pppd[1838]:     Couldn t increase MTU to 1500
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 ifnamepp0 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_ESTABLISH(4)
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 ifnamepp0 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_NETWORK(7)
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 ifnamepp0 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 connect_time:355824129 bytes_sent:287346 bytes_rcvd:544123 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell ip_down()
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell PPP Environment:device:nas1 ifnamepp0 linkname:config0 iplocal:74.102.130.79 ipremote:10.5.59.1 ppplogname:root orig_uid:0 usepeerdns:1 dns1:71.250.0.12 dns2:71.242.0.12
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Westell phase_hook PHASE=PHASE_TERMINATE(9)
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.notice     pppd[1838]:     Serial link appears to be disconnected.
Apr 11 09:04:04     daemon.info     pppd[1838]:     No response to 6 echo-requests
Apr 11 08:49:27     daemon.info     cwmpd[338]:     CWMP: Final Http Return Code = 204
Apr 11 08:49:27     daemon.info     cwmpd[338]:     CWMP: Inform (200). The following events are true:1 BOOT,4 VALUE CHANGE
Please help!!
TIA

I have sent you a private message regarding your issue.
Anthony_VZ
**If someones post has helped you, please acknowledge their assistance by clicking the red thumbs up button to give them Kudos. If you are the original poster and any response gave you your answer, please mark the post that had the answer as the solution**
Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supersede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or plan

NAT Type - Xbox - Westell 7500

Hello,
I have the Westell 7500(750045) modem/router. I have 2 Xbox's that I would like to open that NAT for. Those 2 xbox's are on the same network. It will let me port forward to one xbox, but I am having trouble for the second one.
What I've read, I'm supposed to enable UPnP since I am using more than 1 xbox - however I have tried that, and it doesn't seem to work. I've tried it many times, many different ways, and it never seems to work.
I don't know any more ways to try this, seeing that I've failed on every solution I try.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Decker

While you are not on FIOS, I think the post by JayTeen that was posted on 11-18-2011 at 11:12 AM in this other thread will help you.
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/2-XBOX-360-1-Actiontec-MI424WR-issues/td-p/370011
If you have any questions, please ask.
If you are the original poster (OP) and your issue is solved, please remember to click the "Solution?" button so that others can more easily find it. If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the "Kudos" button.

Traffic shaping for the Mac

Some routers offer a traffic shaping option to keep uploads from slowing down downloads on asynchronus connections. The Airport Express doesn't? Any software to do it on the Mac?

No the AirPort Express (AX) does not have this feature.
Any software to do it on the Mac?
Of course that would only affect traffic to/from that one specific Mac. You might want to take a look at IPNetTunerX.

New westell 7500 Now computer no longer sleeps

Good day to all
I just got online with new Westell 7500 modem/router now HP Pavillion desk top computer
which has a sleep button on keyboard will not stay in sleep mode.
There must be setting which I could change, I hope. If any one knows please share w/me
thanks
nedt
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi smith6612
Well it's the next an your information was right on. My slept all and never woke
again thank you so much
nedt

Traffic Shaping ASR9k in output interface.

If we configure output traffic shaping on an ASR 9000 interface the Service Policy is not installed, however in cco we can find that traffic shaping is supported see the next link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4.2/qos/configuration/guide/b_qos_cg421asr_chapter_0100.html#ID407
My configuration is:
policy-map I4-TEST-OUT
class class-default
shape average 300000 bps
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1/10
description <DESCRIPTION . CIRCUIT_ID>
bandwidth 300
service-policy input I4-TEST-IN
service-policy output I4-TEST-OUT
ipv4 address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
ipv4 verify unicast source reachable-via rx
load-interval 30
ASR9k#show policy-map int g0/0/1/10
GigabitEthernet0/0/1/10 input: I4-TEST-IN
Class class-default
Classification statistics          (packets/bytes)     (rate - kbps)
    Matched             :                   0/0                    0
    Transmitted         : N/A
    Total Dropped       :                   0/0                    0
Policing statistics                (packets/bytes)     (rate - kbps)
    Policed(conform)    :                   0/0                    0
    Policed(exceed)     :                   0/0                    0
    Policed(violate)    :                   0/0                    0
    Policed and dropped :                   0/0
GigabitEthernet0/0/1/10 direction output: Service Policy not installed
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:CE.HTCHP.RPE01#
as you can see we got a message "GigabitEthernet0/0/1/10 direction output: Service Policy not installed".
If I use a class instead of the class class-default the policy-map is correctly installed, If I use a child policy-map under the class class-default the policy is installed also.
Do you know if it is a restriction to use traffic shaping in an output interface and using the default class?
regards
thanks

I forgot to post the 15.x otuput; here it is.
R2#sh policy-map int f0/0
FastEthernet0/0
Service-policy output: SHAPE_10M
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
      14 packets, 1056 bytes
      5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
      Match: any
      Queueing
      queue limit 64 packets
      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
      (pkts output/bytes output) 14/1056
      shape (average) cir 10000000, bc 40000, be 40000
      target shape rate 10000000

Traffic shaping on 6509

I have got a Catalyst 6509 switch with MSFC3 and IOS 12.2(18)SXD3.Can anyone suggest how to implement Layer2 traffic shaping in the MSFC.

thanks Prashanth
This helped me alot.This document indicates policing in MSFC is done on IP.But can we implement policing on MAC basis? Because my setup is such that I have a firewall module operationg in routed mode. I create L2 VLANs in MSFC and map the same onto the firewall module.As traffic shaping/policing cant be done on the firewall module i have to do it on the MSFC. Can policing help limiting bandwidth on L2 VLANs in this scenario?
thanks again
Ashish

Traffic-shaping for delay sensitive traffic

Hello, I would like to verify the use of a traffic-shaping policy within an MQC. I was told that you need to apply a shaping policy in order for QoS to always be engaged and not simply during times of congestion. This apparently is critical when you have apps like VoIP.
On a similar note, i remember reading up on Ciscopress that you might NOT want to subject VoIP to any form of Shaping as this introdues delay and can cause Jitter.
Below is a sample config. If you can post an authoritative source on CCO that explains this I would greatly appreciate it.
Regards,
-Mike
policy-map QoS-Policy
class realtime
priority 512
police 512000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
class preferred
bandwidth remaining percent 40
random-detect dscp-based
class missioncritical
bandwidth remaining percent 39
random-detect dscp-based
class trans-apps
bandwidth remaining percent 16
random-detect dscp-based
class general
bandwidth remaining percent 1
random-detect dscp-based
class class-default
bandwidth remaining percent 4
random-detect dscp-based
policy-map shape-20MB
class class-default
shape average 2000000
service-policy QoS-Policy
interface Serial0/0/0
service-policy output shape-20MB

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
I was told that you need to apply a shaping policy in order for QoS to always be engaged and not simply during times of congestion.
Nope.
You only need to shape when you're dealing with a path where you know the end-to-end bandwidth is less the the egress interface's physical bandwidth and where you cannot manage congestion further downstream along the end-to-end path.
On a similar note, i remember reading up on Ciscopress that you might NOT want to subject VoIP to any form of Shaping as this introdues delay and can cause Jitter.
Semi-true.
The problem can be mitigated by decreasing the shaper's Tc. Also, if shaper doesn't account for L2 overhead (and I believe many do not), you'll need to shape "slower" than the nominal bandwidth. The major problem with the latter, L2 overhead varies, as a percentage, based on packet size. So, you can either allow for worst case, which will best guarantee VoIP service, but tends to give up much of the available bandwidth, or you can shape for average case, which will make VoIP latency and jitter more variable but usually not so much to exceed its service requirements.
You can also bypass shaping for some traffic, but then you need to shape all your other traffic even slower to guarantee the non-shaped traffic bandwidth is always available. As you're effectively reserving this bandwidth, it then becomes unavailable for your other traffic even when unused.
An example of the latter:
policy-map QoS-Policy
class preferred
bandwidth remaining percent 40
random-detect dscp-based
class missioncritical
bandwidth remaining percent 39
random-detect dscp-based
class trans-apps
bandwidth remaining percent 16
random-detect dscp-based
class general
bandwidth remaining percent 1
random-detect dscp-based
class class-default
bandwidth remaining percent 4
random-detect dscp-based
policy-map shape-20MB
class realtime
priority 512
police 512000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
class class-default
shape average 1950000
service-policy QoS-Policy
interface Serial0/0/0
service-policy output shape-20MB
NB: BTW, the above doesn't account for L2 overhead, and I wouldn't recommend it for other reasons, but it should show how you can bypass the shaper.

Traffic Shaping on a 2600 router (IOS ver 12.2.31)

I have configured traffic shaping on a Fastethernet subinterface as follows;
f0/0.1
traffic-shape rate 256000 7936 7936 1000
After reviewing the management graphs it looks as though the Traffic Shaping is not working as the graph shows a utilization of 800%. Is there a known reason for this and is there a way I can check on the router. I have ran the show commands but nothing is obvious as to the reason for this. The router is a replacement for a 1721. The same config has been applied. This started happening when the routers were changed.

This is a very vague question, but you may need to add a bandwidth statement to your interface for your application to correctly interpret the utilization.

Westell 7500 Traffic Shaping

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for