What are differences between Java and C#

Question

What are differences between Java and C#?
I was looking at C# and it looks very similar to java, does anyone have any input on what the primary differences are?

Answer 1

C# has ventricles, being a more modern, hip,and
stylin language.Yeah, but it can't use them properly unless youbolt
on an after-market turbo charger and paint some
go-faster stripes.
Java doesn't need ventricles, as the language is
built as a bifurcative scrobbidibbit from theground
up.
And here I thought you were smart.The ventricles add power on the backswing and keep
down the humpty-B count, and those stripes don't
really do much except to impress the PHBs. A
ventricle here and there wouldn't do Java anyharm.
Oh, I see.
I didn't realize you were concerned with humpty-B. So
I suppose you put 17 firewalls in front of your VM's
Jeffries tubes too huh? And measure productivity in
fleems per wonkle?
That may have worked back when you carved FORTRAN on
stone tablets, and then went to look for a nice young
lady to club and take home. But modern software
development techniques demand a focus on the
regressive thromboid paradigm, and ventricles only
get in the way when you're trying to calibrate that
against the latest fractal suppository data.At least I have actual experience in carving FORTRAN on stone tablets, so I know what I'm talking about. (The clubbing was the other way around but that's neither here nor there.) As for your regressive thromboid paradigm, regressive is exactly what it is. Progressive paradigms, whether thromboid or rhomboid, require ventriculation to achieve their maximum potential.
And I suppose if you're still using those Jeffries tubes in your VM, it's not surprising that it's humptied to the max. Try installing Apache Fallopian if you really want to dehumptify it, or Apache Eustachian for 64-bit VMs.