What are the license limits of FDS Express?

I understand that FDS Express is max 1cpu, no cluster and
it's ok to use it in production.
Are there any hidden hard limits to it's use? For example is
there a hard-wired maximum number of "connections", number of
RemoteObject requests or messages/second or anything?

Here's the relevant section from the 2.0.1 license.
3.1.3 Adobe Flex Data Services Express License. This Section
3.1.3 applies only if Licensee has obtained a valid Adobe Flex Data
Services Express Software license. With respect to each unique
application created by Licensee, Adobe grants Licensee a license to
install and use such unique application and the Adobe Flex Data
Services Express Software as Production Software on a Per-CPU
basis; provided that Licensee shall not: (a) install, use or access
such unique application and/or the Adobe Flex Data Services Express
Software on more than one CPU, (b) cluster any CPUs, and/or (c) use
load balancing. For avoidance of doubt, Licensee shall not deploy
any unique application on multiple disconnected single CPUs,
including without limitation, on kiosks and other such
devices.

Similar Messages

Is Firefox available for use in a Citrix environmet, what are the licensing implications

Is Firefox available for use in a Citrix environmet, what are the licensing implications

Licensing is easy: the [http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/ Mozilla Public License] is free and open. Naturally, it contains the customary disclaimers and limitations.
Implementation might be more of a challenge because Firefox presumes certain things about the system.
I suggest joining the Enterprise Working Group Mailing List to connect with an audience of corporate implementers on this issue and search the list archives.
* http://www.mozilla.org/firefox/organizations/
* https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
If you find other good resources, would you mind contributing them back to this thread? Thanks.

What are the safe limits of current and voltages

What are the safe limits of current and voltage of an ac signal to the NI USB 6008.

Hi hanan,
current is voltage/resistance. There surely a resistance is given too...
Best regards,
GerdW
CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
Kudos are welcome

What are the licensing terms for Creative Cloud Market Assets (e.g., what does Royalty Free mean? Can I use it in items for sales)?

What are the licensing terms for Creative Cloud Market Assets (e.g., what does Royalty Free mean? Can I use it in items for sales)?

Found it Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported — CC BY-NC-SA 3.0

What are the license conditions for the customer ?

What is the license agreement for the customer to use Beehiveonline ? Is it similar as the OUM Customer model copied below? thanks Francis
OUM Customer Program: The OUM Customer Program allows customers to obtain copies of the method for their internal use by contracting with Oracle for a services engagement of two weeks or longer. Customers who have a signed contract with Oracle and meet the engagement qualification criteria as published on Customer tab of the OUM Website, are permitted to download the current release of OUM for their perpetual use. They may obtain subsequent releases published during a renewable, three-year access period.

Hi,
We do not have a license requirement for BeehiveOnline as this is a service provided by oracle for Oracle customers, partners etc. to allow them to work more efficiently with Oracle. It is not a system that the customer can control as the groups are maintained by the Oracle,contact.
We rely on the normal terms and conditions that all users sign up to when they create an oracle.com website account.
So in short - it is a free-to-use service licensed under the same agreement as the normal oracle.com websites acount.
Phil

What are the main differences between airport express and extreme?

what are the main differences between the express and extreme base stations.

In addition to Bob Timmons' link the main differences are as follows:
Extreme has a slightly more powerful antenna (might not be true but from experience it seems to be)
Extreme has USB HDD sharing
Express has AirPlay
Extreme has 3 Gigabit ports (don't be confused by Apple's page. Apple states 4 including WAN, 3 without WAN)
Express is smaller
Express has 10/100 Ethernet whereas Extreme has Gigabit

What are the main differences between Signal Express and Labview?

National Instruments provides a matrix so one can quickly compare the
various versions of Labview but no comparison of Signal Express with
Labview. Hence how does Signal Express compare with Labview? What
are some of the things one can do with Labview one can't do with
Signal Express?
Howard

hrh1818 wrote: Which version of Labview are you referring to? I don't consider the graphical version of Labview to be a full featured programming language. LabWindows/CVI is by a long shot a lot closer to being a full featured programming language than the graphical version of Labview.
Howard,
You clearly don't know what you are talking about. There is no "graphical version" of LabVIEW, there is just LabVIEW. Click on the article "Is LabVIEW a general purpose programming language?" written by the Jeff K. for some easy reading from a few years ago. It is all still true (except that object oriented features and recursion have been added in recent versions).
One of the main points at this years NI-week was the discussion of how processor development is switching more and more to multicore designs to improve performance because a simple boost in clock frequency is becoming more difficult. Linear, text based code is not well suited to take advantage of multticore design, while the dataflow based LabVIEW programming language automatically scales well to multiple processor cores, without any need to rewrite older code. I would say that only LabVIEW is futureproof in this respect. LabVIEW programmers are not wimps that are simply too stupid to write text based code. LabVIEW is not a toy language for people that don't want to learn a "real" programming language.
LabVIEW is arguably the best programming language in terms of getting things done! I've never felt limited with LabVIEW and my programs often don't even have anything to do with data acquisition or instrument control. The difference between text based code vs. LabVIEW is like "DOS vs. Windows", "Radio vs. HD television". "Trilobyte vs. Homo sapiens" (sorry Putnam ). Text based code is monochrome, archaic and outdated and its linearity imposes unecessary constraints on the programmer that can only be (partially) overcome by wasting even more time throwing even more code at it.
Sure, a seasoned text based programmer will initially have problems adapting to LabVIEW, just because you would need to adapt to and embrace the power of dataflow and not try to make a literal translation of the text code to LabVIEW, retaining old habits. If you get stuck, come back and ask here in the forum.
You were looking for object oriented features and failed. All you need to do is a quick site search. All the information is out there. Just because you cannot find it in the first five sentences of the glossy brochure does not mean it does not exist. Maybe you want to read one of the application notes such as:
LabVIEW Object-Oriented Programming: The Decisions Behind the Design
In general, you should avoid judgement until you have all information. Your opinions seem quite biased and superficial and not really based on hard facts.
Initially you asked about the difference between signal express and LabVIEW.
hrh1818 wrote:
> What kind of measurments do you want to do and what kind of requirements do you have?
> You can also see for yourself and download evaluation version of both.
No thanks, there has to be a better way to get an answer to my
question than get involved in a two month study project.
If you would answer the first question quoted above, we could certainly help you with the decision. Isn't that the main purpose of this thread?
You can also contact your local LabVIEW Field Engineer to go over your requirements and help you make a decision. They usually know their stuff!
Message Edited by altenbach on 09-02-2007 11:51 PM
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

What are the possible limitation?

Dear All,
I have multithreaded socket programming which is running on linux environment. To run it as a daemon I use this software YAJSW . Before it I use to have problem of "too many open file" so then I have set a higher file descriptor settings. The problem is that the software run smoothly for few months and suddenly it stop without any error on the log file of the wrapper programme. What else could be limiting my code? Could it be due to leak in JVM etc?

You have previously checked my programme where I have broken into relevant proper functionNot Reading data on particular port? January 2010?
and you have said is fine ready on my codes.No, I have never said any such thing. After a great deal of effort on my part over 21 months you have been occasionally convinced to adopt a small number of my suggestions. What remains, last time I looked, is some of the worst computer programming I have ever seen in my life.
If it was due to file descriptor burst then the error must surface rite.Please restate that in standard English. My tolerance for gibberish is zero.
Can it also be the cause of the YAJSW which I am using to run my programme as a service?First you will have to confide in us what YAJWS is.

Do Reason and GB2 work well together? What are the benefits & limitations?

I was reading on the propellerhead web site that GB2 supports Reason. I am completely green on both these programs.
Reason by itself seems pretty neat, and I can see a bunch of areas where Reason will compliment GB2.
Do any of you out there currently use both these programs in conjunction with one another. If so what are your likes and dislikes. Do you have any tips or basic knowledge I should be aware of before diving in?
Thank you.
iMac G5 Mac OS X (10.4.2)

Edit: oops, posted in wrong thread. hang on.
Alright: so all I use is Reason 3 and GB2. What I love about Reason is that there are soo many Refills out there. I only have about 15 or 20 of them, but I love each one.
I make many different genres of music on my own, including grind, folk, hip-hop, experimental, and some progressive jazz. I always use Reason for drums (not loops, I create the beats myself with the Redrum Computer) and then I'll mix it up between Garageband and Reason with the instruments.
my myspace music has some good examples. "The Green Door" is all Reason except the Star Wars quotes which were added in GB. "38 seconds of test" is just Reason drumming, and then I mic'd my guitar amp, and acoustic guitar in garageband.
Anyway, I think Reason and Garageband work wonderfully together. But then again, I've never used Pro Tools or any of that stuff, so I'm sure someone else could tell you a million reasons why they think another duo is better.

What are the size limitations, if any? Best practices?

Are there any limitations on the size of the Spiceworks database (including knowledge base), outside of the system it lives on, or a point at which it might begin to affect performance? If so, is there an archive feature, or is the solution deleting old tickets and kb articles?
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Hi Astrid,
Thanks for reaching out.It could be a out of memory issue.
If you increase the memory that SAP Predictive Analysis is allowed to consume.
Go to the location where SAP Predictive Analysis was installed. In my case it is:
C:\Program Files\SAP Predictive Analysis\Desktop
Here you find a file "SAPPredictiveAnalysis.ini" - open this in Notepad and change the
"-Xmx" parameter to approximately half of our PC/laptops memory.
For instance in your case you could try with: -Xmx4096m
I have outlined this is a few more steps here:
http://scn.sap.com/message/15099575#15099575
Hope it works for you.
Best regards,
Kurt

What are the licensing terms for Creative Cloud Market Assets?

Hi, can anyone enlighten me on the licensing terms for Creative Cloud Market Assets? I have seen this question asked in the forum before, but as yet there's been no answer (or no helpful answer).
For example, although royalty free, does the licence exclude items for resale? For example:
• Can a CC Market pattern be used on a mug for resale?
• Can a CC Market pattern be used as an allover print on accessories? ie a children's bag
Thanks for the help.

Found it Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported — CC BY-NC-SA 3.0

What are the forensic limitations of Metadata & Exif Data+ Adobe Photoshop 3 question; e.g. Metadata

I have some questions regarding metadata, and exif data on digital cameras and its forensic limitations in Adobe photoshop 3;
For instance; After a picture is taken and has a metadata/exif digital stamp of the "picture being taken day" under what circumstances can that "picture being taken day" be changed?
Does the picture being taken day change when you import it into adobe photoshop 3 and add a caption?
Does it change only when the picture is edited, to perhaps add a white sidebar that says "family photo" or whatever?
Under what circumstances does the exif/metadata digital time stamp of the "picture being taken day" change?
Also, is it possible to change the picture being taken day on a photograph in adobe photoshop 3 manually?
Thanks-
Phil

I guess it would be easier to give you an example. The above picture shows the exif data as 9.11.2001. How is this possible if this is a 911 victim? In the top metadata, it says Adobe photoshop 3. I assume this is the program it was last edited in? Or was adobe software used exclusively in cameras back then perhaps? I am not sure, I just know I have many questions I really want answers to. Was the exif data changed perhaps in the above photo on 9.11.2001 to add that white sidebar, which says (Family photo) ?? Click the image below to see the screenshot of what I am looking at, this way we are on the same page or picture so to speak.
Any help you can give will be greatly appreciatted...
Thanks,
Phil

What are the size limitations in Predictive Analytics - regression charts

I'm trying to display the trend chart for an Exponenential Regression Prediction and I got the following error. The Regression itself runs OK and provides a summary, but I can't display the data on a chart.
There's only 1 other related posting- Error PAS10066 and it doesn't provide much more info than is in the error itself.
Does anyone have extra info on what the size of the limitation is? Is it something that can be overcome with extra RAM etc?
I'm using the desktop version of PA 1.19, and I'm on a 64 bit installation of Windows 7 with 8GB of RAM, processing a csv file with 1.1 million rows.
I've used some filters in the Prediuct workflow to cut down on the amount of data being processed, and I got past the PAS10066 error and am now getting a max call stack size error - can't find anything related on SCN for this one.
Many Thanks
Astrid

Hi Astrid,
Thanks for reaching out.It could be a out of memory issue.
If you increase the memory that SAP Predictive Analysis is allowed to consume.
Go to the location where SAP Predictive Analysis was installed. In my case it is:
C:\Program Files\SAP Predictive Analysis\Desktop
Here you find a file "SAPPredictiveAnalysis.ini" - open this in Notepad and change the
"-Xmx" parameter to approximately half of our PC/laptops memory.
For instance in your case you could try with: -Xmx4096m
I have outlined this is a few more steps here:
http://scn.sap.com/message/15099575#15099575
Hope it works for you.
Best regards,
Kurt

What are the storage limits for LR Mobile Sync?

I'm trying to find a definitive answer on whether there are limits to the amount of data that can be synced to Lightroom Mobile. I know my CC subscription gets me 20GB but I have also heard suggestions that LR Mobile sync data is outside of that.
I have a 128GB iPad, so it wouldn't be terribly hard for me to blow a 20GB limit.
Thanks,
Fraser

Fraser, Mobile only has lossy Smart Previews and camera roll files so you can have plenty of files on your iPad from Lightroom. They are outside the 20GB of CC AFAIK.

KMDF Driver. What are the recommended limits for buffer size when calling WdfCommonBufferCreate

Hi,
I have a customer who wants to really stress-test his PCIe hardware. His idea is to declare two 8 GB buffers alternately filled by application software and fetched by scatter/gather DMA in the hardware (Transfer to PCIe card). If I calculate this through,
this is a maximum of 2M scatter/gather elements per buffer or 32 MByte, assuming S/G element is 16 bytes. i.e. 64 MByte logically contiguous memory as a common buffer for storing the S/G lists. The test system will have plenty of memory, 32 G upwards.
Still don't think I am likely to get a 64MByte common buffer from the system or even two disjunct 32 Mbyte buffers. If I look at poolmon on my server, the current size for NP is only 86M
So I expect the driver will have to handle multiple calls to EvtProgramDma, each covering just part of the 8G to be transferred.
Still I have two questions:
1) Are there any recommendations, house numbers from experience etc. regarding what is a usable maximum size I can reliably get for a common buffer with a call to WdfCommonBufferCreate (percentage of NP pool?, absolute number? ...). The common buffer is
for storing the S/G elements for the HW DMA controller
2) If I just declare a huge array of SCATTER_GATHER_ELEMENT[4M] or 2x huge arrays SCATTER_GATHER_ELEMENT[2M] in the device context (to be managed later by WdfMemoryCreatePreallocated() etc.) , will windows refuse to load the driver because the driver footprint
is too large?
We are talking about Windows 7/x64
Thanks,
Charles

Don,
thanks for your reply. The card is always physically present in the test system which means I could load the driver at boot time, but it would have to be after PCIe enumeration of course.
So far I have always managed to avoid writing a boot-start driver, my main objection being for "purist" reasons. I understand the MS documentation to mean that boot-start is really only intended for devices that are required to boot the system
(disk, console, keyboard, maybe network ....). I am aware of the advantage of boot-start though, a much higher probability of getting contiguous memory in larger chunks. This driver however is definitely not relevant for system start. The add-in card is essentially
a high performance source of test data and only runs when a SW application has been started.
The card does have high performance scatter/gather DMA support also 64-bit addressing capability.
I do wish Microsoft would issue some guidelines regarding realistic sizing of common buffers, it would make my discussion easier. Yes, I could write a test driver and measure it out but I don't really have time for that. Microsoft surely have test/application
teams for figuring these things out.
Charles

What are the license limits of FDS Express?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for