What color spaces/profiles are used?

I can’t find any information on the color
spaces/profiles/tags used for the Kuler color conversions.... can
someone please help?
Thanks

The ICC-profiles should be selectable.
They should always show up behind the RGB and CMYK entries.
Also the used CMM should be selectable and documented on
screen.
A colortransformation without knowing about these conditions
is worthlessly.
There should be a information whether the created color fits
the RGB- or CMYK-Profile-Color-space or was cropped (by the
rendering intent).
It would be nice if kuler would be allowed by the user of
that website to use the actuell CS3-Colorsetup (selected on the
users computer).
If a color theme is stored and published, all this should be
documented with that theme.
Thanks

Similar Messages

What color space does Apple use: for its printing: sRGB, Adobe???

My images are coming back washed out, yet look great on screen. my camera is set to Adobe RGB, so i wonder if this is the problem... usually, consumer cameras are sRGB, I think.

Apple uses the sRGB color profile for it's prints, books, etc.
Do you Twango?

What color space are the Color Lookup presets meant for?

I've noticed that if I convert the same image to multiple color spaces and apply a 3D LUT with the new Color Lookup adjustment, the result is noticeably different. From experimenting, it seems that the lookup tables operate on whatever RGB value is given to them no matter what color space. Is there a certain color space these were optimized for? For instance, would a certain color space give me a more authentic 2-strip look than another because of the space they were sampled in? And if I create my own 3D LUTs, would I have to create a separate one for each color space in order to get a consistent look in all spaces?

So do you know what color space was used to create the presets that are there, such as 2-strip and 3-strip? Even though they don't know about color spaces, the different gammas on the input cause the look to come out different in all colorspaces, so it stands to reason that whatever color space the calculations and/or sampling was done in is closest to what was intended while the others are rough approximations. For things like "warming" it doesn't matter, but for ones that simulate actual films I'm curious to know, especially since the 2-strip ones looks a little different than when you just copy the green channel into the blue and green channels as described on all the websites.

I am using PS cs6 and lightroom and I am having a hard time know what color space to choose. The lab that I am using told me that their color space is sRGB. Do I need to have both PS and Lightroom set at sRGB or should I have PS set at adobe RGB and jus

I am using PS cs6 and lightroom and I am having a hard time know what color space to choose. The lab that I am using told me that their color space is sRGB. Do I need to have both PS and Lightroom set at sRGB or should I have PS set at adobe RGB and just set my export from lightroom as sRGB?

Please post in the Photoshop forum.
http://forums.adobe.com/community/photoshop
Bob

Is there a way in LR to tell what color space a photo is stored in?

I have a lot of 16 bit Tiff files in my Lightroom library. I am looking for an easy way to determine what color space has been assigned to them. The only way I know to find out is to open them in Photoshop. Does Lightroom have a way to tell me? That seems like a pretty basic capability for a high level photo software program like Lightroom, but I can't find it. Does the Tiff file still have the original RGB numbers that the RAW file had, or have they been changed to suite the color space used? If the original numbers are still there, then maybe the assigned color space does not matter, and I can change it if I want? I am Using Lightroom 5.5 on a windows 7 64 system.

In Lr5 - yes, well: sorta..
No display on right under Metadata, nor in lib filters, but smart collections have rule - see 'Color -> Source Color Profile'. Unfortunately, you need to know ahead of time what to look for, but still: it's better than nothing..
For example:
will round up all photos with Adobe RGB profile.
And you can have another with 'contains sRGB' ...
~R.

What color space as base in a brand guide?

What color space forms the base of a color brand guide? How do you start in terms of color spesifications? When I look at most guides it seems that Pantone is always the base, then CMYK, then RGB and Hex? Is RGB and Hex always gonna be a dithered version of the CMYK values or is it best practise to hand pick each one to make them look as close to the CMYK as possible? Is Pantone always mentioned first in the list because that's where the designer started?
Also, is best practise to mimmick the CMYK and Pantone colors so that the RGB and hex values look like them? Seems to me that most brand guides / visual manuals are made firstly for print, then they add the screen based color spaces.
In the enclosed example I also observe that the complete values are not always listed, in many cases the Y and K is missing in the CMYK values, does that mean it doesn't contain any black, or is it simply meaning zero? It rarerly occurs with the other color spaces.

For web, email and screen in general it should always be sRGB. Then you can be fairly certain that it will display correctly (more or less) in any scenario. sRGB wil also work for print (inkjet), it's just that many colors that can be printed are out of sRGB gamut, so it's a restriction that doesn't need to be there. sRGB is a small color space that can't reproduce very saturated colors - they're just clipped. So it's better to start with a larger space like Adobe RGB or even ProPhoto.
For editing purposes you want a large color space simply to have headroom and not hit the wall at every move. The final destination may well be a smaller space, like a printer profile. The software then converts to that destination profile as it goes to the printer. You can soft proof to the printer profile to get an impression of how the final result will look.
You can print directly from InDesign, but the typical InDesign workflow is to export a finished PDF. That is where you specify a final destination profile for the whole document, whether a certain CMYK profile for offset press, or an RGB profile for screen. So you have your master InDesign file, and output PDFs for each destination. The InDesign file can contain placed RGB images in any color space, while text and graphic elements are CMYK. Then everything is converted in one go at export.
You should always go through the PDF Export dialog carefully. Use the presets, but don't automatically accept defaults. For specific purposes, ask here or in the InDesign forum, where they deal with this all the time.
For screen, under "Output" use convert to destination, sRGB, include profile. Under "Compression", things aren't as obvious as they used to be (downsample to 96 or 100 ppi), because of the new retina displays that can benefit from a higher resolution. I hold my judgement on this one.

What color space does Adobe's Cinema Display have?

I just calibrated my Macbook Pro with a Spyder3Elite and got a bit desapointed when I descovered that the best color space it can show is sRGB. After finding this, and since I've been thinking about buying an iMac for a while, I got a bit frightened. Thus, I changed my atention to Adobe's Cinema Display in hope that it has a larger color gamut.
The thing is I can't seam to find anyone that can tell me what color space does this displays can produce, iMac nor Cinema Display. If there's anyone who has already calibrated any of these displays, can you tell me what's the best color space they can work on?
Thanks in advance.

Ok, I'll try to be clearer to the best of my abilities.
1st off, There are 2 kinds of color spaces. Device-dependent and device-independent. Hence, a display has a limited color gamut that it can produce, it has it's own color space.
When I calibrated mine, this was the result:
Purple: Adobe RGB 1998
Green: sRGB
Red: Display's Gamut
The thing is, before I calibrated my monitor, I thought it had an Adobe RGB 1998. Got pretty desapointed when I found out it didn't... Nevertheless, what I'm looking is to know if there's any Apple display with a larger gamut than the one from my Mac or if they're all sRGB...
Hope to have been more clear this time.

Question: sRGB color space profile icm

I am trying to convert a file to color space sRGB color space profile.icm. The profile is located in my library on my hard drive under recommended profiles but it does not appear in the drop down menu under edit/convert to profile. Any ideas about why? I have performed this task on my MAC at my college but can't seem to do it on my MAC in my studio...

LR converts them to the colorspace specified on the Export panel. There are several choices, including sRGB. You may need to expand various sections to see the option.

What color is recommended to use on a black background for credits or thank yous in a video?

What color is recommended to use on a black background for credits or thank yous in a video?
Thank you for your help.
barb

barb
If it is not too distracting, I like to overlay the credits on a still scene that sort of sums up the whole movie....just so the credits are not overshadowed by the background. That worked well for a movie of a little league baseball game and my favorite baseball little leaguer.
Another time, for a birthday celebration for a retired very special person, I used rolling credits against just a smiling face of the birthday person with a chiming like version of happy birthday music. I kept everything light and readable with a balance between face and credits. Then as the credits ended, I eased into a thank you to him title followed by cameo shots of faces with names (about 3 cameos per image) of all the people who attended the gathering for this special person. So many times as the years go by there will be a person watching the video and asking who is that? So, my cameos were gently placed and presented and served the purpose of letting everyone know/remember who was who.
I tend to let the work direct me in all decisions in creating the credits. Probably white is the generalized answer for lettering against a black background. Just white rolling credits on black does not necessarily grab by attention. But that is a generalization that may not apply to your specific project.
Just some thoughts.
ATR

Cisco IronPort Plug-In 7.3 breaks when multiple profiles are used?

In our testing of the Cisco IronPort Plug-In 7.3 we found that if seperate Outlook profiles are used that are configured to different e-mail accounts the plug-in gives an error.
Here's the scenario.
Profile A configured with [email protected] up and running receives the BCS Configuratoin File and the plug-in recognizes it and enables the ENCRYPT button.   User1 can use Outlook along with ENCRYPT and all works well.
But, if that same workstation users opens a different Outlook mail profile is opened that is configured to a different e-mail account. Profile B configured with [email protected] the following error is generated: "An error occurred during C:\ProgramData\Cisco\Cisco IronPort Email Security Plug-in\user1\config_2.xml configuartion file initialization. Some settings have been set to the default values."   Outlook works fine, the decrypt button is greyed out, which is expected, [email protected] is not ENCRYPT enabled.
The problem is when the user opens up Profile A again, a different error occurs "
"An error occurred during C:\ProgramData\Cisco\Cisco IronPort Email Security Plug-in\user1\config_1.xml configuartion file initialization. Some settings have been set to the default values." and the ENCRYPT button is still disabled, even though this user is authorized for ENCRYPTION.   At this point the user has to open the BCS Configuration File again, which does give the message 'This message contains a secure attachment with settings for [email protected] Do you want to apply these settings?".   If they answer YES, the ENCRYPT button is re-enabled.
Is Cisco aware of this?   What is the resolution?
Thanks.

Same workstation AD login that has full access to both e-mail accounts.
Email account A profile A is the same as the workstation login used.   Email account B profile B is a different e-mail address / AD object but user A has full access to the mailbox.
I would expect Encryption to work for Profile A and not for Profile B, e-mail address B was never sent the configuration file. But when I go back to use Profile A, encryption is no longer enabled, requireing me to run the configuration again.

I have a Mac purchaesd in India. Now i am travelling to USA. In India power is at 220V but in USA it is 120V (if i am right). What i need to do. Also what type of plugs are used in USA. Type A,B,C etc.

I have a MacBook Pro purchaesd in India. Now i am travelling to USA. In India power is at 220V but in USA it is 120V (if i am right). What i need to do. Also what type of plugs are used in USA. Type A,B,C etc.

All you will need is a USA adapter for your MBP power adapter since it will work in electrical environments from 100v. to 220V. It seems that a type B will be needed.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mains_electricity_by_country
Ciao.

What Color Space to choose for viewing jpegs on a monitor

After reading many webpages and watching many tutorial videos about which color space to use, I get odd results. I understand that sRGB is more for web applications, and that Adobe RGB 1998 has a wider gamut, and that ProPhoto has the widest gamut of colors, particularly helpful with printing.
However, in LR 4, when I export to jpeg as sRGB, Adobe RGB, and ProPhoto, the differences are very noticeable. sRGB looks the most vibrant, Adobe RGB looks flat, and ProPhoto looks dark with a greenish cast. I expected ProPhoto to look best, or is that only for printing, and I have to process differently?
What am I misunderstanding here? TIA.

It depends on three factors:
1. The monitor - normal, which means with a gamut close to sRGB, or "wide gamut" with a gamut that approaches Adobe RGB (and today there are plenty of medium priced "wide gamut" monitors).
2. The viewing application and whether it is color managed. In a nutshell, color management translates the image color numbers to eqivalent color numbers in the monitor's color space.
3. Whether the monitor is calibrated and profiled. In order for color management to work properly the application must know what the image's color space is (embedded profile) and what the monitor's space is (monitor profile). Any display on the monitor is always in the monitor space, but in order for the display to be accurate the translation must be made.
If all three conditions are fulfilled, alll images, no matter what their spaces are, will be displayed more or less the same because they have all been translated to the same display space. I say "more or less" because if the image is in a wide space that needs to be compressed to fit in the monitor space, there may be slight differences in the way colors that are out-of-gamut for the monitor are rendered, but the differences are slight.
Without those three factors, only images in the space closest to your monitor's native space will be properly displayed. So if you have a "normal" monitor, choose sRGB and if you have a "wide gamut" monitor, go with Adobe RGB, but keep in mind that other people with "normal" monitors and without color managed browsers/viewers will not see it properly.

What Color Space to Set in Nikon Camera

Nikon cameras alllow the user to set the colorspace into the camera. There are a lot of choices. A few of them have the letters RGB included in the name.
Which color space should an Aperture user select?
(I mostly shoot in ambient light. And sometimes use flashes in a softbox. Photos are seldom printed.)

William Lloyd wrote:
I don't know of a single camera that shows a RAW-based histogram on the LCD.
Me too.
William Lloyd wrote:
It's true that histogram blinkies _may_ not indicate an area of the photo that is unrecoverable. Still, if I'm shooting and I get blinky highlights I'll re-shoot if I can, because you're so close to the edge that it's hit-or-miss.
I use Sony FF bodies almost exclusively. I'm learned to judge from the blinkies and their relationship to the scene what they mean for blown pixels. The Sony FF histograms (and they seem to be equal in this regard, even for very different cameras {e.g.: a850 and RX1R}) seem to give at least 2/3 of a stop cushion in the highlights. In practice, if there are no blinkies at the highlight end, I can increase the exposure at least 1/3 and often 2/3 of a stop without ending up with blown pixels in the converted-from-RAW file. So I usually aim for at some blinkies -- the exception being where the highlights are broad and significantly lighter than the rest of the scene.
In fine, on my Sony cameras, the blinkies are not actually "close to the edge". Rather they are on the grass on the other side of the pedestrian walkway that itself is still inside the caution rope.

What Color Space Should I Shoot In.

First, I'll admit that the entire color management aspect of photography/monitors/printing, is a bit too dense for me to completely comprehend. However, I do have some working knowledge of it. So, here's my pre-LR setup.
I shoot in sRGB and used Photoshop Elements or RSE or DPP to process the RAW or JPG shots. I export in sRGB and do not allow the printer to Color Manage (I use Windows, BTW) If I send to a lab, I do not use any ICC profiles, as I cannot soft proof, so I let the lab use their profiles. My monitor is calibrated using a Pantone Heuy (I know, not as sophisticated as a Spyder, but what I see on the screen matches what I shot, so I'm happy with it.
Now. I will be using LR exclusively for processing my photos. What should I set my camera to? I can use AdobeRGB or sRGB. I realize that LR uses ProPhoto, so I'm not sure where my shooting choice adds or subtracts from the equationand I'm still not sure what settings to print in. I can easily try to let LR translate or manage my file when sending to my home printer. How should I prepare a photo for sending to a lab?
What should I shoot in?
Should I do anything to the LR color space I work in?
What should I do, in regards to color space for printing?
Thaks,
Steven (the confused)

Thanks, Ian. For some unknown reason, I had some time ago set up my user name as one of my e-mail addies, and then when I became active on the LR forums, was too occupied to deal with it, until I learned it was easier than pie. And much easier than pi. 3.414x, no?
I'm leaving in an altered non-robotical-vulnerable format for a bit, so that those that knew me as the E-mail address, or McPhotoman in the beta forum can either listen to what I say, or avoid my postings.... Cheers.

PSE 10 as external editor for Aperture 3 - 8-bit TIFF and what color space?

Hi all,
I'm taking the plunge and trying PSE 10 as my external editor for Aperture 3. I understand that I need to export as 8-bit TIFF files (not 16) because PSE can't do certain things with 16-bit files. Is that right? Should I specify a color space in Aperture or leave it as "no profile selected"? (I don't know much about color spaces; I'm not a pro.) I print on an Epson RX580 Stylus Photo printer, if that matters.
I'll be grateful for any help and advice. Thanks.

Can I suggest you buy Philip Andrews book, Advanced Photoshop Elements 10. he explains colour spaces and much much more very clearly and exactly what can be done with 16 bit files and what you then have to change to 8 bit to accomplish. He's written basic and advanced guides for Elements since day one. Usually available from Amazon for under £20.

What color spaces/profiles are used?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for