What Compressor Settings for the web?

I have a 1min40 sequence with the Settings: PAL, Frame Size: 1280x720, 25fps, Compressor HDV720p25. What Compressor Settings would you recommend please:
1) to put it in a website
2) for Broadcast: would Apple ProRes HQ be a good choice?
Thanks in advance.

You can review the information first hand at youtube.com
Or create a custom preset in Compressor:
Name: YouTube sharing
Description: H.264 video at 8 Mbps with AAC 44.1kHz audio
File Extension: mov
Estimated size: 3.6 GB/hour of source
Audio Encoder
AAC, Stereo (L R), 44.100 kHz
Video Encoder
Format: QT
Width and Height: Up to 1280 x 720
Pixel aspect ratio: Default
Crop: None
Padding: Preserve source aspect ratio
(L: 0, T: 0, R: 0, B: 0)
Frame rate: (100% of source)
Frame Controls: Automatically selected: Off
Codec Type: H.264
Multi-pass: On, frame reorder: On
Pixel depth: 24
Spatial quality: 50
Min. Spatial quality: 50
Temporal quality: 50
Min. temporal quality: 50
Average data rate: 8 (Mbps)

Similar Messages

  • What are BEST settings for the WEB?

    Hello, I have a short in RED Hd 1920/1080 finished on FCP 6. I made a QT and then used compressor to make a 800mbps Quicktime for the web, deinterlaced and checked BETTER tab, others stayed with regular.
    I also made one through FCP into a QT in 640/480 which is size I need.
    On the web it looks clear and plays fine. Problem is when there is motion or
    lots of movement, it stops and goes, jitters like ****, not smooth all.
    What settings are best to make it SMOOOTH, just like when watching it on computer or as best. I know you got much bigger things to talk about but if you know please let me know.
    H.264, Mpeg4 or Sorenson ect...just looking for smooth as can get it for playing on web.
    THANKS.

    800mbps Quicktime for the web,< </div>
    The compression is reducing the number of pixels being shown in order to maintain the bitrate. So rapid motion, which requires nearly all of the pixels to be redrawn, causes things to stutter.
    Compression is really, really hard to do. Really.
    bogiesan

  • Photo settings for the web

    I wish to find the best setting for editing photos to be published to the web.  I previously had cs3 and had no problems, but now I have cs6 and have noticed that the pictures lose color saturation and just plain look faded when I upload them to my website.  I have been all over the internet looking for information and have made some changes according to what I have found, but the photos still look the same on the web.  Can someone please help?  Thank you.

    Ok I just found the place to change the information on the google chrome settings but still not any different.  I guess I am expecting my pictures to look exactly how they look in photoshop when I post them to my web page.  I have always just saved my photos.  I have made all my settings in CS6 to sRGB and I thought that would fix the problem but its not.  Is there anything else I am missing?  Can you believe, all of this over one stinking photo because I am a perfectionist.  I am trying to get my photoshop settings perfect (at least the way they were in cs3), when I should be in my studio designing jewelry.  LOL!

  • Settings for the web

    Hi,
    I'm putting together a photo slide show, set to music in iMovie 08. I'd like the final dimensions to be 320 X 240 and I'll be posting this on a web page. I tried using the pre packaged Share options but they all resulted in very large files. I used to do something similar with iMovie O6 Quicktime export but I can't remember the settings I came up with.
    Any good rules of thumb settings that'll help me get this down to a reasonable size? I am assuming that I'll be using the Quicktime export in iMovie 08 as well.
    Thanks for any advice.
    Joe

    I referring to file size. I want to display at 320 x 240.
    Video data rate controls file size for the most part. Therefore, you want to use a highly efficient, high compression codec to achieve the highest quality in the "smallest package." As to display size, that can be user adjusted using the same work flow. If all of you potential viewers have QT 7, I would go with H.264/AAC. You should be able to get by with a total data rate on the order of 512 to 768 Kbps and still have reasonably good quality. (Lower if less quality is required.)

  • Hello All... Back after a brief absence, things look a little bit different. I'm trying to take a 16 minute mini dv video and compress it for use on the web. I'm interested in any suggestions you may have on settings for the video and audio tracks. I'v

    Hello All...
    Back after a brief absence, things look a little bit different.
    I'm trying to take a 16 minute mini dv video and compress it for use on the web. I'm interested in any suggestions you may have on settings for the video and audio tracks. I've tried using Sorenson 3 (15 frames, key frames set to automatic, 320 x 240) for video and IMA 4:1 (mono) for audio. The resulting video looked great but the file size came in at about 255 Mb.
    Thanks!
    PowerMac G5 1.8 Dual   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  
    Message was edited by: Dan Foley

    Thank you for the replies.  Everyone was correct about the jack, interface, and phasing problems.  I have been unplugging my motu audio interface and then using headphones at work.  I have not changed any detailed audio output settings in logic.  When I read that the jack might be a problem I tried switching headphones.  This actually helped.  I am using dre-beats headphones and they seem to be having issues with the mac/jack-(the phasing/panning problems.  I can use these headphones with other devices but not the mac.  I have to use ipod ear buds and the phasing seems fixed.  Hopefully this information is helpful to someone else. 
    If anyone knows how to correct this issue please let me know its difficult to know what my final mixes are going to sound like and I have had to keep bouncing everything into i-tunes- sync to ipod and then listen in my car radio. 

  • What compressor settings settings are best for 1080i  to output to DVD using DVD Studio pro?

    What compressor settings settings are best for 1080i  to output to DVD using DVD Studio pro? I used FCP 6, exported using Quick Time.

    DVDs are only SD. There was at one time HD-DVDs, which DVD SP and Compressor can make, but HD-DVDs will only play in Macs and, now obsolete HD-DVD players. HD-DVDs will not play back in standard DVD players or Blu-Ray players. If you want to make a "DVD will be played on DVD player for TV" disc, your only choice is SD.
    If you want HD video on a disc, then you want Blu-Ray. You will need a Blu-Ray burner (Apple does not make a Blu-Ray burner so you will have to buy a third-party Blu-Ray burner), Blu-Ray discs and software that will make a Blu-Ray disc. That could be the latest version of Compressor, or FCPX, or Toast, or Encore.

  • What are the settings for the outgoing mail server for icloud on Outlook for Mac, what are the settings for the outgoing mail server for icloud on Outlook for Mac

    what are the settings for the outgoing mail server for icloud on Outlook for Mac, what are the settings for the outgoing mail server for icloud on Outlook for Mac

    iCloud Mail Settings

  • What are the settings for the "Default Client Settings"?

    What are the settings for the "Default Client Settings"? I changed them instead of creating a new policy and would like to fix that.
    Thanks
    James A+, Network+, MCP

    Hi,
    The blogs below provides the default client settings.
    Default Client Settings in SCCM 2012 SP1
    http://prajwaldesai.com/default-client-settings-sccm-2012-sp1-sccm-2012-sp1/
    Note: Microsoft provides third-party contact information to help you find technical
    support. This contact information may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this third-party contact information.
    Best Regards,
    Joyce

  • What processes are included in 'save for the web'

    When I save a photo using the Photoshop CS3 'save for the web' command, I resize the photo to, for example, 800 pixels on the long side. It comes back the correct size but sometimes the colors look different (a little red usually). Is this because I was editing the original photo in RGB? Should I convert to profile, sRGB before I save for the Web? Or does Photoshop do this automatically? OR, should I convert to sRGB and then do color adjustments for the web?
    Sorry, I'm a little confused about this...
    Thanks,
    Jody

    Photoshop is color managed. However, the web is not, so when you save to web, you lose your color management. If you want to see what is going to happen after SFW, you should set the color to sRGB, as you guessed.
    However, that will only set the way the color looks on your monitor. It could vary wildly on anyone else's monitor.

  • HT3228 What's the correct email settings for the fastest email receiving on my iPhone 4s

    What's the correct email settings for the fastest email receiving on my iPhone 4s

    As no one here knows who your email provider is, no, no one can help. Have you tried looking at your email provider's help pages? Done an internet search?

  • My ICloud isn't talking to both my MacBookPro and IPhone. What are the settings for the Mac

    My ICloud isn't talking to both my MacBookPro and IPhone. What are the settings for the Mac and any suggestions?

    In the AirPort Utility, I selected the Advanced tab, and then selected Port Mapping.
    Q: What service do I choose from the drop-down menu? Also, where do I enter the two ports you mentioned? Public UDP Port(s)? Public TCP Port(s)? Private IP Address: Private UDPPort Private TCP Port?
    still confused, I guess. Thanks!

  • HD video compressed for the web

    I was doing some testing trying to figure out the best way to compress the HD video I get from the Sony XDCAM HD for the web (streaming). I shoot in HD (1080/30P) because it's needed for our videos. The web streaming is secondary.
    I would prefer to make the web videos .flv because it works best and most easily cross-platform. In the real world, the majority of users have Windows PCs, which made me hesitant to use h.264 (.m4v) because it probably would require the average user to download things they may not wan to. Nonetheless, it has to be viewable on all computers in all browers.
    So, I took three 10 second clips of steady camera video with audio from the camera that I used in all tests. I will refer to them by clip number...
    Clip 1: 30P 16:9 High quality, 10sec=45mb
    Clip 2: 30P 16:9 Low Quality, 10sec=24mb
    Clip 3: 60i 16:9 High Quality, 10sec=45mb
    First I tested making FLV is Adobe CS3 Encoder using the High Quality (700) setting.
    Test 1 used size 848x480 (16:9)
    Clip 1: 1.3mb
    Clip 2: 1.1mb
    Clip 3: 1.2mb
    Comments: Looked very crisp, audio was clean, slightly darker image than original on default settings
    Test 2 used size 480x270 (16:9)
    Clip 1: 1.2mb
    Clip 2: 1.1mb
    Clip 3: 1.1mb
    Comments: Looked very crisp, audio was clean, slightly darker image than original on default settings
    Next, I tested making .m4v using the h.264 iPod settings in Compressor.
    Test 1 used size 640x370.
    Clip 1: 240kb
    Clip 2: 1440kb
    Clip 3: 204kb
    Comments: Image wasn't quite as clean as the Flash files, but still good. Much lighter/brighter than the Flash files also. Low Quality HD video had high file size... why? I don't know, but I don't shoot on LQ for things anyway.
    Test 2 used size 320x180.
    Clip 1: 160kb
    Clip 2: 865kb
    Clip 3: 865kb
    Comments: Image wasn't quite as clean as the Flash files, but still good. Much lighter/brighter than the Flash files also. Low Quality HD video had high file size... also the 60i file...why? I don't know.
    In conclusion, I'm lucky that I shoot 30P since it worked well in all areas. The h264 codec provides a much smaller file size than Flash, with a good image. Amazing considering we started with a 45MB clip. What are the standards for aspect ratios for putting 16:9 video on the web? I haven't heard much set in stone like you have for 4:3 video. Nonetheless, the 640x360 or 480x270 seem to be a nice size for most uses.
    I have heard that in Flash 9 you can chance the m4v extension to flv and it will work. IF that is true, that would be great because now my concern is that a base Windows PC cannot play these .m4v images without plugins/codecs. I suppose right now its a tradeoff between smaller file size/less compatibility with h264 or larger file size, great compatibility with Flash.
    Any comments or suggestions to help out would be great. I typed this fast so forgive me if I left out any important info.

    Hi APPLE27:
    One comment from your post that immediately caught my attention was this, "Nonetheless, it has to be viewable on all computers in all browsers."
    Unfortunately, it is unrealistic to expect one digital video file to be viewable on "all computers in all browsers" as there are simply too may variations in both hardware and software.
    A common approach when offering digital video is to provide two formats to choose from and then within each of those two formats a few versions of the video for different bandwidths.
    For example, a web site might offer Video for Windows and QuickTime. For each of these, there would be a low bandwidth Video for Windows file and QuickTime file and a high bandwidth Video for Windows file and QuickTime file (four files total). Of course, there's also Flash Video, Real Video, MPEG1, and so on.
    For better or worse, YouTube.com has allowed video content creators the realistic expectation of creating a digital video file that is viewable on "most computers". But, the video is unavoidably tied to that web site.
    When it comes to online distribution of video, it's still very open ended.
    Also, computers are not all that's out there. Mobile devices are a huge market and you'd be hard pressed to create a single digital video file that will play on all mobile devices (iPhone, iPod Touch, Palm Treo, Sony PSP, etc.) either from local storage or from a mobile browser.
    QuickTime offers a solution for creating a referencing movie - one file that links to other digital video files, but it too is imperfect at best when it comes to reaching the broadest audience possible.
    With my few comments here, I'm just scratching the surface. But, it all starts where you are right now: caring about the image quality when exporting from your edited master.
    -Warren

  • Exporting FCP 16:9 to QT for the web in 16:9?

    Hello everyone,
    I recently began doing my projects in 16:9 mode. I shoot them with my GL2's in 16:9, then capture to FCP as usual. FCP then automatically recognizes the 16:9 footage and adjusts everything perfectly for me. I figured out how to get the footage to DVDSP by 'forcing letterbox'. This plays the true 16:9 footage on a widescreen TV perfectly.
    Now, I've come to another bridge that I can't seem to cross... that is... exporting the video to QT for the web in 16:9. I did a lot of searching here and all of the topics related to this did not help me at all. So, what I'm going to do is explain what I used to do when I shot in 4:3 mode:
    1. In FCP... File>Export>QT Conversion
    2. Format: QT Movie> Options
    3. Settings> Sorenson Video 3
    4. Frame Rate>15
    5. Key Frames: Every 150 frames
    6. Compressor> Medium
    7. Data Rate: Automatic
    8. OK
    9. Sound>Settings>Mpeg-4 Audio, 16bit, Stereo
    10. OK
    11. Prepare for Internet Streaming> Fast Start
    12. OK
    13. SAVE
    This usually turns a full sized 5 minute clip into a nice little presentation for the web no larger than 35 or so MB's. You can see a boat load of files like that on my website at (www.buerhausdesign.com).
    Now, what I want to do is get a similar sized video for the web, only in 16:9 as I'm now shooting and editing in 16:9.
    Does anyone have step-by-step instructions on how to do this? I know it's possible as I see movie trailors in 16:9 all the time in QT.
    Any help would be appreciated:)
    Matt

    Nope, tried all of that. It stretches the image way beyond 16:9. Currently, if I export as a 4:3 file, the widescreen displays correctly, but I get two black bars at the top and bottom of the frame. Manually sizing to a 16:9 size, to say 720x404, stretches everything... including the unwanted black bars.
    When I export to DVDSP, the black bars go away when I 'force letterbox'. There's gotta be a way to get it to work in QT.

  • Getting best possible look for the web!

    I am using Compressor for compressing my footage for the web. When I export out of FCP my footage looks nice and crystal clear however when I compress the footage then upload to the net its not as nice looking as it was. Now I recently bought a Compressor DVD Tutorial by Ripple Training Series. I pretty much knew just about everything on that DVD. I did try some suggestive settings that have made somewhat of a difference but its not crystal clear like many videos I see uploaded to DVXuser. The settings below might be okay it might just be the hosting site I have my videos on. Currently I am using www.sharkle.com
    Here are some settings I use:
    Compression Type - Sorenson Video 3
    Frame Rate 15
    Key Frame Every 75 frames
    Quality - Medium
    Restrict Data to 400kbps (this is for DSL modems) around 1500 for cable modems
    Audio
    Q Design Music 2
    Channels = Stereo
    Sample Rate = 48k
    Streaming = Fast Start
    Geometry
    320x240
    If anyone sees anything that I should change or try out differently please let me know. Again I am using Compressor and can also compress using Quicktime as well.
    Here is a link to the latest video I completed for the web:
    http://www.sharkle.com/video/78755/
    I am not sure if SHARKLE is recompressing the footage. If it is then thats why its not as good of quality.

    Their making a FLV file from your sent in video.
    Push your video back up to a high quality movie and send that in to them.
    What you have sent in has all been squeezed highly with compression. Then they take and further compress it in the FLV format. Double compressing...not good.

  • Clip for the web

    Hi. A client has asked us to create a clip suitable for the web for a project we recently edited for them. What the best programme to use to this? I heard Mpeg Steamclip is good but there is sooo many settings. The clip was edited in FCP 7 its 5 minutes longs. Client simply wants the file so they can upload to their site. could someone please advise settings which result in the clip loading pretty fast while keeping the quality good.
    Thanks.

    Any serious converter will have many settings for your indulgence. Before you do any conversions ask your client of the size he requires. You can use compressor to convert to H264, or a load of other programmes such as MPEG Streamclip. The problem with other converters is that they cost money whereas compressor is part of FCS and MPEG Streamclip is free.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can I use one email address for two apple devices? (One iPad2 and one iMac.)

    I've been trying to find this information by searching the web and I can't find a good answer. Can I use [email protected] for my "iPad AppleID" and use the same email address for my "iMac AppleID"?

  • How to configure the flat file in 11G

    Hi, I am using OWB 11.1.0.6.0. For a map in OWB 10G having a source a flat file. I used to go and right click on the map--> then click Configure-->then Under "Source Data File" type the file name-->then give the location details and the exact flat fi

  • Ios7 - how can i delete queued downloads in itunes?

    Ios 7.0.3 ipad 2 This seems to be a constant problem with itunes on the ipad but there still does not seem to be a clean fix offered by apple. I have 50 downloads sitting in my download queue in itunes which i want to delete since they are episodes o

  • Archive Film Widget Not Working

    My Archive Film Widget stopped working. Now it's just a blank yellow rectangle without any text... Anyone have information about this? Has it been suspended or forgotten or shut down forever? Thanks d iBook G3, eMac 1.33   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

  • "catalina start -security" doesn't work

    I downloaded Tomcat 5.0 from Sun which is used to work with WSDL 2.0. But when I try to launch Tomcat with "catalina start -security" command, nothing happened. If I try "catalina start", then it works. Any idea would be appreciated. Thanks.