What does Lync automatic/Manual Failover between sites

Hi,
I have 2 Lync sites. Each site has one FE pool with 3 FE servers. Each Pool has dedicated one BE server
I configured backup pool relationship with each other. no Enterprise voices in my Lync infra.
I would like to know what Lync does exactly when Lync automatic failover while one site goes unexpected down?
will users gets their contacts after moving another site pool?
also
I would like to know what Lync does when we do Lync manual failover while one site goes for maintanence?
Will user gets their contacts after moving another site pool??
Thanks

You need to have the CMS available as it's the repository that stores the topology, configurations and policies. If the pool that hosts the CMS goes down you must failover the CMS before you can failover the pool. Presence information and contacts is not
part of the CMS.
Fail Site B, you'll see that users are in limited mode until you run the pool failover commands even though Site A has the CMS.
More details:
what is the CMS: http://blogs.technet.com/b/jenstr/archive/2010/10/13/what-is-central-management-store-cms.aspx
Pool Failover: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/jj204678.aspx
Please mark posts as answers/helpful if it answers your question.
Blog
Lync Validator - Used to assist in the validation and documentation of Lync Server 2013.

Similar Messages

  • What does checking mail manually mean on a macbook air?

    what does checking mail manually mean on a macbook air, how is it done?

    In Mail's preferences click on the General icon in the toolbar. Here you can set Mail to automatically check for mail Manually.
    Then to check for mail you would have to click on the Get Mail icon in the mail browser window:
    which is the icon that looks like an envelope.

  • OT: What Does a Client Own When a Site's Developed

    Hi All --
    I have a new client who wants me to do maintenance and
    updates to an
    existing site. She also wants to move her site to a new host.
    Sounds
    simple enough. However, the company that originally built the
    site and
    currently maintains and hosts it is being less than fully
    cooperative, and I
    could use some advice on how to proceed.
    What they are telling me and my client is we can move the
    site we just can't
    have the "back-end programming" which they claim is
    proprietary. Here's his
    quote: "We can't simply hand over the coding as this is
    proprietary
    information. If we handed it over, you could essentially
    start your own
    stationery web design company - this is coding we designed
    from scratch to
    handle all of our stationery clients' web sites... It has
    been tweaked for
    each client."
    I've reviewed her contract with these guys and there is no
    mention of
    anything being considered proprietary.
    When a client pays me to build a site I turn everything over
    that him/her
    when the job is complete. Even sites that have required
    customized
    programming become the property of the client. If something
    is deemed
    proprietary it's called out specifically in the contract.
    Having said all this, I'm not sure how to deal with these
    guys. Any advice
    would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    John

    Hi Patty --
    I've been trying to set-up a time to talk with them about
    this, but they've
    been avoiding it. The owner of the company keeps telling me
    to talk to the
    guy who wrote the code. The guy who wrote the code won't
    respond at all.
    Then the owner says they're really busy and we should just do
    it via email.
    All in all, they've been acting very unprofessionally.
    Here's the thing, they still haven't told me what this
    proprietary code
    does. Just that they can't hand it over. Something else that
    frosts me is
    I get the feeling they are just trying to hold on to the
    hosting business
    and their monthly maintenance fee. The owner has written more
    that once
    that "...it would be much easier for everyone involved if we
    kept it where
    it is and we would provide you with FTP access. This way, you
    won't have to
    reprogram the coding. However, you won't have ROOT access to
    the server... "
    This is the "stationery web design company":
    http://www.noteworthydesignsonline.com/index.shtml.
    Maybe what he's
    referring to is the fact that they've built sites for others
    who sell
    stationery online. Still, the question they've yet to answer
    is the one you
    asked -- what is the proprietary code. I have asked that
    question directly
    and still no answer.
    John
    > This is of course just my opinion, and I'm not a lawyer.
    From what you say
    > about the other company's contract with her, it doesn't
    sound like they
    > have too much of a leg to stand on, legally. But it
    would obviously be
    > best to settle with them amicably if possible.
    >
    > Have you spoken with them directly yet? I think I would
    try a
    > friendly-as-possible conversation with them. Maybe they
    can be reasoned
    > with and moved from their rigid position, especially if
    you take a civil,
    > professional, non-combative approach with them.
    >
    > I would first want to know what a "stationery web design
    company" is -
    > what the proprietary code is. It sounds like they have
    templates and some
    > kind of a CMS. Assuming this is true, you could explain
    to them that you
    > have absolutely no interest or intention of starting a
    "stationery web
    > design company". Maybe you could offer to sign something
    to that effect,
    > that you would not re-sell their code, or re-sell works
    based upon their
    > code.
    >
    >
    > --
    > Patty Ayers | Adobe Community Expert
    > www.WebDevBiz.com
    > Free Articles on the Business of Web Development
    > Web Design Contract, Estimate Request Form, Estimate
    Worksheet
    > --
    >
    > "Tarvardian" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >> Hi All --
    >>
    >> I have a new client who wants me to do maintenance
    and updates to an
    >> existing site. She also wants to move her site to a
    new host. Sounds
    >> simple enough. However, the company that originally
    built the site and
    >> currently maintains and hosts it is being less than
    fully cooperative,
    >> and I could use some advice on how to proceed.
    >>
    >> What they are telling me and my client is we can
    move the site we just
    >> can't have the "back-end programming" which they
    claim is proprietary.
    >> Here's his quote: "We can't simply hand over the
    coding as this is
    >> proprietary information. If we handed it over, you
    could essentially
    >> start your own stationery web design company - this
    is coding we designed
    >> from scratch to handle all of our stationery
    clients' web sites... It has
    >> been tweaked for each client."
    >>
    >> I've reviewed her contract with these guys and there
    is no mention of
    >> anything being considered proprietary.
    >>
    >> When a client pays me to build a site I turn
    everything over that
    >> him/her when the job is complete. Even sites that
    have required
    >> customized programming become the property of the
    client. If something
    >> is deemed proprietary it's called out specifically
    in the contract.
    >>
    >> Having said all this, I'm not sure how to deal with
    these guys. Any
    >> advice would be appreciated.
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >> John
    >>
    >>
    >
    >

  • In preferences what does "Override automatic cache management" mean and do?

    I was wondering what "Override automatic cache management" means and does.

    Firefox normally manages the size of it's cache, and can cache more or less information depending on various factors.
    Checking this option allows you to specify the maximum size of the Firefox cache, in MB.
    There isn't usually any need to enable this option.

  • What does the automatic document feeder tray do?how to use it in hp photosmart 7510

    wht is the automatic document feeder tray for? how to use it?

    The ADF is used to automatically feed a number of pages for scanning, copying or faxing.  Paper is loaded into the ADF with the printed side facing up.  When you then copy (or scan or fax) the pages will be automatically pulled into the scanner mechanism one at a time and then deposited in the output tray. 
    Bob Headrick,  HP Expert
    I am not an employee of HP, I am a volunteer posting here on my own time.
    If your problem is solved please click the "Accept as Solution" button ------------V
    If my answer was helpful please click the "Thumbs Up" to say "Thank You"--V

  • What does "Automatic Retrieval" do under email dow...

    Hi there
    on my nokia 6303, under my downloading settings for my email, i have various settings:
    Retrieve mode
    Retrieval amount
    Mailbox update interval
    Automatic retrieval
    I can set mailbox update interval to say 30 minutes or 1 hour or so and the phohne will check for new emails at that interval and report any new ones.
    But what does the "automatic retrieval" function do? When i set it to on or off it seems to make no difference. Does anyone know specifically how I should set this?
    many thanks
    Aroon

    no one know what this setting does?  it seems like a lot of people have it activated here.
    surely someone must have an idea how it works!

  • TS4006 when using iCloud between mac and pad, what does this mean - "your iPad will  no longer back up to your computer automatically when you sync with iTunes"

    when using iCloud between mac and pad, what does this mean - "your iPad will  no longer back up to your computer automatically when you sync with iTunes"
    DONT WORRY EVERYONE, FOUND THE ANSWER I NEEDED FROM ANOTHER POSTING - THANK YOU

    Welcome to the Apple Community.
    You don't need to do anything, you have chosen to back up to iCloud instead of iTunes.
    Being able to back up to the cloud can be very useful, especially if you don't have access to a computer or have infrequent access to one, however unless you specifically need to use iCloud for back up, you will find backing up to iTunes significantly more convenient and possibly more reliable.
    More about iCloud v iTunes Back Up

  • My iMac running 10.10.2 keeps crashing several times a day. It does a automatic restart and gives me a option to send in a report. Any ideas what might be causing this?

    My iMac does an automatic restart several times a day. It gives me a option to send in a "panic" report. This happens randomly during the day and night. Any idea of anything new that might be causing this? I am up to date on all applications.

    Mac users often ask whether they should install "anti-virus" (AV) software. The usual answer is "no." That answer is right, but it may give the wrong impression that there is no threat from what are loosely called "viruses." There is a threat, and you need to educate yourself about it.
    1. This is a comment on what you should—and should not—do to protect yourself from malicious software ("malware") that circulates on the Internet and gets onto a computer as an unintended consequence of the user's actions.
    It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to the computer, or who has been able to take control of it remotely. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it. AV software is not intended to, and does not, defend against such attacks.
    The comment is long because the issue is complex. The key points are in sections 5, 6, and 10.
    OS X now implements three layers of built-in protection specifically against malware, not counting runtime protections such as execute disable, sandboxing, system library randomization, and address space layout randomization that may also guard against other kinds of exploits.
    2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files, and to block insecure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user. Internally Apple calls it "XProtect."
    The malware recognition database used by XProtect is automatically updated; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
    The following caveats apply to XProtect:
    ☞ It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets.
    ☞ It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
    As new versions of OS X are released, it's not clear whether Apple will indefinitely continue to maintain the XProtect database of older versions such as 10.6. The security of obsolete system versions may eventually be degraded. Security updates to the code of obsolete systems will stop being released at some point, and that may leave them open to other kinds of attack besides malware.
    3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been a second layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't been checked for security by Apple unless it comes from the App Store, but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. That may not mean much if the developer lives in a country with a weak legal system (see below.)
    Gatekeeper doesn't depend on a database of known malware. It has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
    ☞ It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
    ☞ A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could simply ignore the consequences of distributing codesigned malware.
    ☞ An App Store developer could find a way to bypass Apple's oversight, or the oversight could fail due to human error.
    Apple has taken far too long to revoke the codesigning certificates of some known abusers, thereby diluting the value of Gatekeeper and the Developer ID program. Those lapses don't involve App Store products, however.
    For the reasons given, App Store products, and—to a lesser extent—other applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed, are safer than others, but they can't be considered absolutely safe. "Sandboxed" applications may prompt for access to private data, such as your contacts, or for access to the network. Think before granting that access. Sandbox security is based on user input. Never click through any request for authorization without thinking.
    4. Starting with OS X 10.8.3, a third layer of protection has been added: a "Malware Removal Tool" (MRT). MRT runs automatically in the background when you update the OS. It checks for, and removes, malware that may have evaded the other protections via a Java exploit (see below.) MRT also runs when you install or update the Apple-supplied Java runtime (but not the Oracle runtime.) Like XProtect, MRT is effective against known threats, but not against unknown ones. It notifies you if it finds malware, but otherwise there's no user interface to MRT.
    5. The built-in security features of OS X reduce the risk of malware attack, but they are not, and never will be, complete protection. Malware is a problem of human behavior, not machine behavior, and no technological fix alone is going to solve it. Trusting software to protect you will only make you more vulnerable.
    The best defense is always going to be your own intelligence. With the possible exception of Java exploits, all known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "Trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore amounts to a battle of wits between you and Internet criminals. If you're better informed than they think you are, you'll win. That means, in practice, that you always stay within a safe harbor of computing practices. How do you know when you're leaving the safe harbor? Below are some warning signs of danger.
    Software from an untrustworthy source
    ☞ Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, doesn't come directly from the developer’s website. Do not trust an alert from any website to update Flash, or your browser, or any other software. A genuine alert that Flash is outdated and blocked is shown on this support page. Follow the instructions on the support page in that case. Otherwise, assume that the alert is fake and someone is trying to scam you into installing malware. If you see such alerts on more than one website, ask for instructions.
    ☞ Software of any kind is distributed via BitTorrent, or Usenet, or on a website that also distributes pirated music or movies.
    ☞ Rogue websites such as Softonic, Soft32, and CNET Download distribute free applications that have been packaged in a superfluous "installer."
    ☞ The software is advertised by means of spam or intrusive web ads. Any ad, on any site, that includes a direct link to a download should be ignored.
    Software that is plainly illegal or does something illegal
    ☞ High-priced commercial software such as Photoshop is "cracked" or "free."
    ☞ An application helps you to infringe copyright, for instance by circumventing the copy protection on commercial software, or saving streamed media for reuse without permission. All "YouTube downloaders" are in this category, though not all are necessarily malicious.
    Conditional or unsolicited offers from strangers
    ☞ A telephone caller or a web page tells you that you have a “virus” and offers to help you remove it. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn visitors who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
    ☞ A web site offers free content such as video or music, but to use it you must install a “codec,” “plug-in,” "player," "downloader," "extractor," or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one.
    ☞ You win a prize in a contest you never entered.
    ☞ Someone on a message board such as this one is eager to help you, but only if you download an application of his choosing.
    ☞ A "FREE WI-FI !!!" network advertises itself in a public place such as an airport, but is not provided by the management.
    ☞ Anything online that you would expect to pay for is "free."
    Unexpected events
    ☞ A file is downloaded automatically when you visit a web page, with no other action on your part. Delete any such file without opening it.
    ☞ You open what you think is a document and get an alert that it's "an application downloaded from the Internet." Click Cancel and delete the file. Even if you don't get the alert, you should still delete any file that isn't what you expected it to be.
    ☞ An application does something you don't expect, such as asking for permission to access your contacts, your location, or the Internet for no obvious reason.
    ☞ Software is attached to email that you didn't request, even if it comes (or seems to come) from someone you trust.
    I don't say that leaving the safe harbor just once will necessarily result in disaster, but making a habit of it will weaken your defenses against malware attack. Any of the above scenarios should, at the very least, make you uncomfortable.
    6. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related, despite the similarity of the names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform for running complex applications in a web page, on the client. That was always a bad idea, and Java's developers have proven themselves incapable of implementing it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been to a Windows-style virus affecting OS X. Merely loading a page with malicious Java content could be harmful.
    Fortunately, client-side Java on the Web is obsolete and mostly extinct. Only a few outmoded sites still use it. Try to hasten the process of extinction by avoiding those sites, if you have a choice. Forget about playing games or other non-essential uses of Java.
    Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and by Oracle (the developer of Java.) Don't use either one unless you need it. Most people don't. If Java is installed, disable it—not JavaScript—in your browsers.
    Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java on the Web can't be trusted. If you must use a Java applet for a task on a specific site, enable Java only for that site in Safari. Never enable Java for a public website that carries third-party advertising. Use it only on well-known, login-protected, secure websites without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you'll see a padlock icon in the address bar when visiting a secure site.
    Stay within the safe harbor, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can practically be. The rest of this comment concerns what you should not do to protect yourself.
    7. Never install any commercial AV or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they are all worse than useless. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use one of the free security apps in the Mac App Store—nothing else.
    Why shouldn't you use commercial AV products?
    ☞ To recognize malware, the software depends on a database of known threats, which is always at least a day out of date. This technique is a proven failure, as a major AV software vendor has admitted. Most attacks are "zero-day"—that is, previously unknown. Recognition-based AV does not defend against such attacks, and the enterprise IT industry is coming to the realization that traditional AV software is worthless.
    ☞ Its design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere. In order to meet that nonexistent threat, commercial AV software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
    ☞ By modifying the operating system, the software may also create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
    ☞ Most importantly, a false sense of security is dangerous.
    8. An AV product from the App Store, such as "ClamXav," has the same drawback as the commercial suites of being always out of date, but it does not inject low-level code into the operating system. That doesn't mean it's entirely harmless. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so will corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
    An AV app is not needed, and cannot be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful, if at all, only for detecting Windows malware, and even for that use it's not really effective, because new Windows malware is emerging much faster than OS X malware.
    Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else. A malicious attachment in email is usually easy to recognize by the name alone. An actual example:
    London Terror Moovie.avi [124 spaces] Checked By Norton Antivirus.exe
    You don't need software to tell you that's a Windows trojan. Software may be able to tell you which trojan it is, but who cares? In practice, there's no reason to use recognition software unless an organizational policy requires it. Windows malware is so widespread that you should assume it's in every email attachment until proven otherwise. Nevertheless, ClamXav or a similar product from the App Store may serve a purpose if it satisfies an ill-informed network administrator who says you must run some kind of AV application. It's free and it won't handicap the system.
    The ClamXav developer won't try to "upsell" you to a paid version of the product. Other developers may do that. Don't be upsold. For one thing, you should not pay to protect Windows users from the consequences of their choice of computing platform. For another, a paid upgrade from a free app will probably have all the disadvantages mentioned in section 7.
    9. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use in the Sharing preference pane. All are disabled by default.
    10. As a Mac user, you don't have to live in fear that your computer may be infected every time you install software, read email, or visit a web page. But neither can you assume that you will always be safe from exploitation, no matter what you do. Navigating the Internet is like walking the streets of a big city. It can be as safe or as dangerous as you choose to make it. The greatest harm done by security software is precisely its selling point: it makes people feel safe. They may then feel safe enough to take risks from which the software doesn't protect them. Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.

  • Azure Site Recovery vs. Manual Failover?

    Hi all-
    I am designing a Windows Server 2012 R2 DR scenario using Hyper-V replica.
    Environment:
    Site A:  Primary Server (HP DL380 using DAS with Gen2 / VHDX VMs).  System Center VMM 2012 R2 management server and console installed on this Hyper-V host.  SQL database for SCVMM placed in one of the VMs on this host.
    Site B:  Replica Server (Identical HP DL380).
    Approximately 10Mbps WAN connection interconnecting the sites.
    I need to provide DR for approximately 5-6 VMs.  These will be running standard MS apps like SQL, SharePoint, etc.
    I am wondering if it's worthwhile to use Azure Site Recovery to orchestrate a small DR scenario like this or whether, due to its small size, I am better off just planning to use manual failover.
    Also, if I DO elect to use Azure site recovery, do I need to install the full SCVMM 2012 R2 Server and Console on the server, or will a management agent from the Primary Server do the trick?  If a full installation, I'm assuming I will need a full instance
    of SQL Server to host a separate database at Site B.  Am I correct?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Azure Site Recovery is awesome, and I will recommend it to all who has a environment that supports it. If all prerequisites is met, it's simple to enable and manage :)
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/azure/dn469078.aspx (Prerequisites and support)
    http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/hyper-v-recovery-manager-configure-vault/
    You can replicate between two clouds on the same on-site VMM server. So if you place your VMM service so it will not fail if your Hyper-V host does, you should be fine :)
    Anyway, if you are fare away from the prerequisites, you might be better of by implementing the built-in Hyper-V Replica service, and the take the step to Azure Site Recovery when you have time.
    Best of luck in your project!
    /Anders Eide

  • How does muse tell the difference between a temporary site and my free 5 sites with my creative cloud membership?

    how does muse tell the difference between a temporary site and my free 5 sites i get with my creative cloud membership?
    because they both use .businesscatalyst.com and there's no option to say that it is a temporary site not a finished site i wish to publish to my creative cloud account.

    Since this is an open forum, not Adobe support... you need to contact Adobe staff to help
    Adobe contact information - http://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html
    -Select your product and what you need help with
    -Click on the blue box "Still need help? Contact us"

  • I've just started using the App Tabs. I think this feature could be handy but why are the sites not updated when I start Firefox. Now I have to manually update the site which is somewhat of a downer. Does any of you know where I'm going wrong?

    I've just started using the App Tabs. I think this feature could be handy but why are the sites not updated when I start Firefox. Now I have to manually update the site which is somewhat of a downer. Does any of you know where I'm going wrong?

    To answer the post title FireFox save all downloads automatically in the download folder, which you can find in the Documents folder. If you want to choose where to save your downloads go to tools>options>check always ask me where to save files.
    Secondly, I am assuming you have IE 8 installed as this is the only version that supports this fix that is currently not in beta. Go to control panel>internet options>advanced tab and reset the settings at the bottom. This may or may not fix the problem but it is a good first step.

  • What is difference between Site template and web template

    What is difference between Site template and web template

    Both are almost same, are you referring to Site Definitions vs web template?, if so, refer to the following post
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vesku/archive/2011/07/22/site-definitions-vs-web-templates.aspx. 
    --Cheers

  • When I click on a link in an email, it does not automatically open the site page? When I receive an email with a link in it, if I click on the link to open the page, nothing happens. It does not open the internet to that page.

    When I click on a link in an email, it does not automatically open the site page?
    When I receive an email with a link in it, if I click on the link to open the page, nothing happens. It does not open the internet to that page.

    I don't appear to have a toolbar either.

  • TS3992 what does it mean that my iphone will no longer back up to my computer automatically when i sync with itunes?

    What does it mean that "my iphone will no longer back up to my computer automatically when I sync with itunes", if I turn my icloud backup to "on"? This doesnt sound like something that will make things smoother? I just recently lost all my calendar events and I am hoping to recover them.

    Welcome to the Apple Community.
    You can either back up to iTunes or to iCloud, you you choose to back up to iCloud, back up to iTunes will be turned off. Personally, I'd always back up to iTunes unless there is a good reason not to you.

  • Since upgrading Iphone to iOS 5.1.1 it does not automatically use wifi internet when wifi is available. It has been draining my mobile data. I can only manually change settings with cellular data everytime I get home. Any other solutions?

    Since upgrading Iphone to iOS 5.1.1 it does not automatically divert to my wi-fi internet when wifi is available in my home. It has been draining my mobile data I  now have very high bills from my mobile carrier for high data usage. I can only manually change settings in the Network and turn cellular data on and off everytime I get home and leave the home. This is very frustrating as it wasn't a  problem until the upgrade. I have spoken to a few people that this has happened to. Has anyone found this problem and does anyone have other solutions?

    Please disregard this question. I'll submit a shorter and more direct question. Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for