What exactly is Redo log buffer?

I know that Redo log buffer is a part of SGA and it sotores each and every change in it. But i want to know whether it stores all the updates and other changes as it is stored in DB Buffer Cache.? Or if not what exactly is sotored in it and when...?
null

Hi,
Redo Log Buffers are part of SGA and they store each and every entry that is made in the DB.
This is also stored in the Redo Log FIles. This information is used during recovery of a Crashed DB.
A Redo Log does not Store the Data but oinly the Stmt. that was executed in the DB.
A DB Buffer Stores data and not the command.
If u need more information Pls Refer to The Oracle 8 Concepts on the Oracle Documentation.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ganesh R
null

Similar Messages

What does redo log buffer holds, changed value or data block?

Hello Everyone,
i am new to database side and have one query as i know redo log buffer contain change information , my doubt is does it store the value only or the changed data block? because if we can see data buffer cache size is more as it holds data block and redo log buffer size is less .

The Redo Log buffer contains OpCodes that represent the SQL commands, the "address" (file,block,row) where the change is to be made and the nature of the change.
It does NOT contain the data block.
(the one exception is when you run a User Managed Backup with ALTER DATABASE BEGIN BACKUP or ALTER TABLESPACE BEGIN BACKUP : The first time a block is modified when in BEGIN BACKUP mode, the whole block is written to the redo stream).
The log buffer can be and is deliberately smaller than the blocks buffer cache. Entries in the redo log buffer are quickly written to disk (at commits, when it is 1/3rd or 1MB full, every 3seconds, before DBWR writes a modified data block).
Hemant K Chitale

Redo log buffer question

hi masters,
this seems to be very basic, but i would like to know internal of this process.
we all know that LGWR writes redo entries to online redo log files on disk. on commit SCN is generated and tagged to transaction. and LGWR writes this to online redo log files.
but my question is, how these redo entries comes to redo log buffer??? look all required data is fetched into buffer cache by server process. it is modified there, and committed. DBWR writes this to datafiles, but at what point, which process writes this committed transaction (i think redo entry) into log buffer cache????
does LGWR do this?? what internally happens exactly???
if you can plz focus some light on internals, i will be thankfull....
thanks and regards
VD

Hi Vikrant,
DBWR writes this to datafiles, but at what point, which process writes this committed transaction (i think redo entry) into log buffer cache????Remember that, Before DBWR Acts on flushing the dirty Blocks to Data files, Before this server process, makes sure that LGWR finishes the writing Redo Log Buffer to Online Redo Log files. Since as per ORACLE Architecture poting of Recovering data till point of time @ Crash is important and this is achieved by Online Redo Logs files.
Rest how the data is Updated in to the Redo Log Buffer Aman had stated the clear steps.
- Pavan Kumar N

Redo Log Buffer sizing problem

My pc has 512mb RAM and i was trying to increase the redo log buffer size. Initially the log_buffer size was 2899456 bytes. So i tried to increase it to 3099456 by issuing the command:
ALTER SYSTEM SET LOG_BUFFER=3099456 SCOPE=SPFILE;
And i issued SHUTDOWN IMMEDIATE. Upon restarting my database, when i queried SHOW PARAMETERS LOG_BUFFER . The value has been changed to 7029248 bytes not 3099456 which i wanted. How did this happen?

1.) We are all volunteers.
2.) It was only 5 hours between posts and you're complaining that there are no answers?
3.) You didn't bother to mention platform or Oracle version, even after being specifically asked for it? Which part of "What is your Oracle version?" do you not understand? And yes, the platform may be useful too....
From memory, there could a couple of things going on. First off, starting in 9i, Oracle allocates memory in granules, so, allocating chunks smaller than granule size can result in being rounded up to granule size. Second, on some platforms, Oracle protects the redo buffer with "guard pages", i.e., extra memory that serves simply to try to prevent accidental memory overflows from corrupting the redo buffer.
If you want a specific answer, or at least a shot at one, post:
1.) Oracle version (specific version: 8.1.7.4, 9.2.0.8, 10.2.0.3, etc).
2.) Platform
3.) O/S and version
4.) Current SGA size
Reposting the same question, or threatening to do so, will get you nowhere.
-Mark

To where does the LGWR write information in redo log buffer ?

Suppose my online redo logfiles are based on filesystems .I want to know to where the LGWR writes information in redo log buffer ? Just write to filesystem buffer or directly write to disk ? And the same case is associated with the DBWR and the datafiles are based on filesystems too ?

It depends on the filesytem. Normally there is also a filesystem buffer too, which is where LGWR would write.Yes but a redo log write must always be a physical write.
From http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:15501909858937747903::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRITERIA:618260965466
Tom, I was thinking of a scenario that sometimes scares me...
**From a database perspective** -- theoretically -- when data is commited it
inevitably goes to the redo log files on disk.
However, there are other layers between the database and the hardware. I mean,
the commited data doesn't go "directly" to disk, because you have "intermediate"
structures like i/o buffers, filesystem buffers, etc.
1) What if you have commited and the redo data has not yet "made it" to the redo
log. In the middle of the way -- while this data is still in the OS cache -- the
OS crashes. So, I think, Oracle is believing the commited data got to the redo
logs -- but is hasn't in fact **from an OS perspective**. It just "disapeared"
while in the OS cache. So redo would be unsusable. Is it a possible scenario ?
the data does go to disk. We (on all os's) use forced IO to ensure this. We
open files for example with O_SYNC -- the os does not return "completed io"
until the data is on disk.
It may not bypass the intermediate caches and such -- but -- it will get written
to disk when we ask it to.
1) that'll not happen. from an os perspective, it did get to disk
Message was edited by:
Pierre Forstmann

REDO LOG BUFFER

Whenever a DML like Insert statement is issued it gets written to the Database buffer cache first by the server process(dedicated server).
Which process writes this DML activity to the redo log buffer ?
I guess DML is first written to the redolog files and only after that the same DML is committed to the data files.Is this correct ?
Can get any references to read on how any activity/DML is processed with a Oracle architecture perspective.
Thanks

Yes. Only the server process for that session knows what changes were made to the buffer cache. So it is the only one that can write the change vectors to the redo log buffer.
Hemant K Chitale

Buffer, library,dictionary, shared pool, redo log buffer chache hit ratios

Can please one provide information and sql queries to calculate Buffer, library,dictionary, shared pool, redo log buffer chache hit ratios and if any other ratio for investigation of performance issues in oracle 10g database (10g.1 and 10g.2 both). thanks in advance.

In and by themselves most of the standard ratio calculations are useless to misleading. All the ratios should always be considered in relation to other data such as total requests for a resource, existence of any outlying values in the associated events, etc ....
The proper warning being given then you can find most of the standard ratios mentioned with SQL for their calculation in the Performance and Tuning manual for your version of Oracle.
HTH -- Mark D Powell --

High redo log buffer wait

Hi,
I can see "high redo log buffer wait" event. The instance spent 23% of its resources waiting for this event. Any suggestion to tune redo log buffer?
DB version : 10.2.0.4.0
Os : AIX
SQL> SELECT name, value FROM v$sysstat WHERE name = 'redo log space requests';
NAME VALUE
redo log space requests 3542
SQL> sho parameter buffer
NAME TYPE VALUE
buffer_pool_keep string
buffer_pool_recycle string
db_block_buffers integer 0
log_buffer integer 14238720
use_indirect_data_buffers boolean FALSE
SQL> select GROUP#,BYTES from v$log;
GROUP# BYTES
1 1073741824
4 1073741824
3 1073741824
2 1073741824
SQL> show parameter sga
NAME TYPE VALUE
lock_sga boolean FALSE
pre_page_sga boolean FALSE
sga_max_size big integer 5G
sga_target big integer 5G
Thanks

Gowin_dba wrote:
I can see "high redo log buffer wait" event. The instance spent 23% of its resources waiting for this event. Any suggestion to tune redo log buffer?
SQL> SELECT name, value FROM v$sysstat WHERE name = 'redo log space requests';
NAME VALUE
redo log space requests 3542 How are you getting from 3,542 "redo log space requests" to 23% of the instance resources waiting for "high redo log buffer wait" (which is not a wait event that can be found in v$event_name in any version of Oracle) ?
"redo log space requests" is about log FILE space, by the way, not about log BUFFER space.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis

Where can I find redo log buffer advice

Hi,
Our customer needs the information about redo log buffer. But In administrator--database configuration--memory parameters item of grid control 10g, I can only get the information about buffer cache & shared pool, as well as the corresponding advice. I cannot find information about redo log buffer in this page. I wonder why the information about redo log buffer is not included in this page.Where can I find it?

The Log Buffer is part of your Intialization Parameters.
So, from EM, you can find the information you need when you select the Database > Adminstration > All Initialization Parameters (under Database Configuration)

Redo log buffer is in cretical position

hi Experts,
please try to solve my query, here in my system redo log buffer shows(alert monitoring) 99<4000 and message is '4000 redo entries per redo log space requests'
so i think i need to increase log_buffer parameter value upto required level ,then i entered in database
splplus / as sysdba
and i try to check my file is in which type (spfile or in pfile) by executing command
" SHOW PARAMETER pfile"
it shows
name--- spfile
type---string
value---/oracle/qty/102_64/dbs/spfileqty.ora
when i Excute 'SHOW PARAMETER spfile' also the same result
now in here i have doubt please clarify me
1) my file is spfile or pfile ?
2) how can i increase my parameter value (alter system set log_buffer = xxx scope=pfile (or) spfile )
3) is that my process correct for that error
please clarify me
thanks & regards

Hi,
As per my knowledge, Oracle 10g by default starts with SPFILE and if you are setting the parameter with alter command then yes the scope should be SPFILE. After that when you schedule any DB related activity(backup, update statistics etc.,) it will create pfile from spfile.
Before doing any changes take the backup of the existing files both (pfile and spfile) at os level.
Regards,
Sharath

Redo Log Buffer 32.8M, Seems to Big?

I just took over a database (Mainly used for OLTP on 11gR1) and I am looking at the log_buffer parameter it is set to 34412032 (32.8M). Not sure why it is so high.
select
    NAME,
    VALUE
from
    SYS.V_$SYSSTAT
where
    NAME in ('redo buffer allocation retries', 'redo log space wait time');
redo buffer allocation retries     185
redo log space wait time          5180(database has been up for 7.5 days)
Any opinions on this? I Normally keep try to stay below 3M and have not really seen it above 10M.

Sky13 wrote:
I just took over a database (Mainly used for OLTP on 11gR1) and I am looking at the log_buffer parameter it is set to 34412032 (32.8M). Not sure why it is so high.
In 11g you shouldn't set the log_buffer parameter - let Oracle set the default.
The value is derived from the setting for the CPU count and the transactions parameter, which may be derived from sessions, which may be derived from processes. Moreover, Oracle is going to allocate at least a granule (which may be 4MB, 8MB, 16MB, 64MB or 256MB depending on the size of the SGA, so you are unlikely to save memory by reducing the log buffer size.
Here's a link to a discussion which shows you how to find out what's really behind that figure.
Re: Archived redo log size more less than online redo logs
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
Author: <b><em>Oracle Core</em></b>

What is online redo log files???

Dear All,
I m bit confused with redo log files.what is need of back up of redo log files?????As i m new in the Basis please tell me i always get confused with redo log files and archive files.
Thanx and reagard's
Ashok

In Oracle you have a number of online redo log files.
In an typical SAP installation you have two directories:
origlogA and origlogB
origlogA contains online redo log 1 and 3 and
origlogB contains online redo log 2 and 4.
In most installation you also have mirrlogA and mirrlogB, which the name tells, is mirrors of origlogA and origlogB.
Now, the online redo logs are circular,
so when 1 gets full oracle jumps to number 2.
At the same time oracle's archiver process starts to copy
online redo log number 1 to a file on disk.
This files are also known as archive redo logs.
In an recovery situation you might do with just the online redo logs,
but usually a combination of both online and archive redo logs is needed.
During database backup, you also backup the online redo logs
You also need to backup (backup twice then delete) archive redo logs.
the archive redo logs are your way back from the restored database to the last transaction of the database.
If one archive redo log is missing, you have to stop you recovery there and loose the rest of the transactions done in the database.

What is a redo log file? can anyone explain in simple terms

I am confused between redo log file and physical datafile can anyone explain in simple terms
Thank u
Regards,
Vijay

See Overview of Physical Database Structures

What is the difference between undo tablespace and online redo log files.

what is the difference between undo tablespace and online redo log files. I am confused
as per my knowledge undo tablespace is used to store the undo information when a table is being updated so that, just incase we need to rollback a transaction we know what was present in the table earlier.
when a transaction fails the SMON performs the rollback of the data.
This undo data is stored in the undo tablespace and read consistency if any is enforced.
is my understanding till here correct?
Now, can this undo data/before image not be stored in the redo log buffer and online redolog files?
can redo-log files not store this information?
in fact, is it that when undo tablespaces exist in a database, the undo data/before image is stored in both the undo tablespace and also the redo log files?
kindly clarify my doubt.
thank you.

This question has been asked many times before. The answer is always the same.
Yes, redo contains the before image of data (and the after-image). Therefore, it **COULD** be used to roll back a transaction.
BUT... Redo is written sequentially. Using it to rollback your transaction would involve reading through all the redo written by maybe thousands of other people. It would be painfully slow.
Your transaction is, however, directly linked to just the UNDO that it generates (which is JUST the before image of the data). So, your undo is your undo and doesn't share space with anyone else's undo. Therefore, using it to roll back YOUR transaction is fast.
The fact that undo is only the before image of the data also makes it faster than wading through a sea of before and AFTER images as you'd find in redo. About twice as fast, in fact, since there's half the data. Roughly.
Redo also gets written and flushed to disk whenever there's a commit, 3 seconds are up or too much (1MB, actually) redo gets generated between flushes caused by other factors. Your redo gets flushed when those things happen, even if you haven't actually committed your transaction. And redo logs recycle themselves, meaning that your redo -even if your transaction hasn't been committed yet- can be over-written by later transactions. Try rolling back when that's happened, if redo was the source of your rollback data!
Undo, however, cannot be over-written if the transaction has not been committed. Ever. If you don't commit for three years, there will be three years' undo stored in your database (assuming you had the space, of course!).
I could go on, but that will do. Redo is there fore RECOVERY, after catastrophe. Undo is there for read-consistency (and the occasional change of mind). Two different functions. Two different mechanisms. Each one highly tuned to doing what it does, why it does it, most efficiently and effectively.

DB Cache Full or Redo Log Full?

Is there any way that Oracle can write to datafiles in the middle of a transaction?
Iam reading, processing and writing very large sized lobs which gives error that "no free buffers available in buffer pool".
When in lobs, a lob is not written until the whole tranaction finishes - but in my case the lob size is large than the size of the data buffer cache.
The error is "ORA-00379: no free buffers available in buffer pool DEFAULT for block size 8K"
Exact question I would like to know now is that which buffer is full; data_buffer_cache or the redo log buffer?
If data_buffer cache, then is there a mechanism which allows to write data to dtafiles in the middle of a transaction as i have to do processing with lobs - which are 3 to 4 times the size of the db cache size.
I am referring to the same problem outlined in an earlier thread.
Thanks

Is there any way that Oracle can write to datafiles
in the middle of a transaction?
r.- Oracle writes to the datafiles only commited transactions according to some elements
Iam reading, processing and writing very large sized
lobs which gives error that "no free buffers
available in buffer pool".
r.- You have to increase the size of the buffer Pool
When in lobs, a lob is not written until the whole
tranaction finishes - but in my case the lob size is
large than the size of the data buffer cache.
The error is "ORA-00379: no free buffers available in
buffer pool DEFAULT for block size 8K"
Exact question I would like to know now is that which
buffer is full; data_buffer_cache or the redo log
buffer?
data_buffer_cache. In what version you are ?
If data_buffer cache, then is there a mechanism which
allows to write data to dtafiles in the middle of a
transaction as i have to do processing with lobs -
which are 3 to 4 times the size of the db cache
size.
r.- Oracle does not write to the datafiles in that way
I am referring to the same problem outlined in an
earlier thread.
Thanks Joel PÃ©rez
http://www.oracle.com/technology/experts

What exactly is Redo log buffer?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for