What export resolution (pixels per inch?)

I was messing around with LRs Export and changed the pixels per inch.  We have our pictures either in a raw or high (large) format jpg that we are brining in.  After doing some work to the images, in order to keep a sharp pixture (not lose any pixels in the image), what amount of pixels should I export with? I think the default was set at 240 pixels per inch? not sure.  What should I set it to?
Thanks...

The ppi is irrelevant unless you are printing, in which case set the require ppi for your printer in the print module.
The only exception would be if you are up sizing the files from their native resolution in LR using cms or inches in the export box. Avoid this and work in pixels and you don't need to concern yourself in anyway with pixels per inch. Just export at the size in pixels you require for the end usage you are putting the file to, or don't resize at all if you want the file to remain at its original dimensions.
The ppi is only a line of metadata, it has no effect on image quality and is only used by a printer to make a conversion from ppi to dpi (dots per inch) when making a print.

Similar Messages

  • I am writing a book to be published.  how to i get my pages documents to PDF or JPG or something else that is at least 224 pixels per inch?

    i am writing a book to be published.  how do i get my "pages document" to a high definition level...at least 224 pixels per inch?  i can get to 150 ppi via preview to JPG, but that seems to be the best i can do with my new snow leopard imac.

    Hello Barbara,
    > i have text written in Pages and these need to be at least 224 ppi.
    i also have photo collages that were created in Pages and also need to be at least 224 ppi.
    the book has about 60 pages of photo collages and about 30 pages of text.
    If you want to print using a digital press or an offset lithographic press at high resolution, then you typography is resolution independent but your photography is not. In other words, you must embed into your Pages document the images in the resolution that is right for rendering in the high resolution raster image processor.
    Raster image processors will as a rule of thumb produce good quality detail if you embed photographs with 300 dot per inch resolution. Because raster image processors differ in how they reproduce detail, and because this information is generally not public a rule of thumb principle is applied in preparing the page description for printing.
    By default, if you use colour transparency in your work, the system graphics service will detect this and save out PDF 1.4 automatically. However, not all raster image processors have PDF frontends that accept PDF 1.4. For this reason, there is a fallback which you must set up yourself.
    If the receiving raster image processor does not have a PDF frontend that accepts PDF 1.4, you have to manually enter the resolution at which the transparency will be rendered. The system graphics service will then render the resolution for you and save out what it technically termed a 'flattended PDF'.
    Alternatively, if you don't want to work with the Apple ColorSync Utility yourself, you can send your PDF 1.4 with resolution independent transparency to a prepress operator who will then use specialised software to render the resolution for the specifics of the service he or she is selling you.
    If you want to work with the prepress interface in system graphics services, then below is a link to summary on setting up the ColorSync Utility for ISO 15930-3:2002 PDF/X-3. This passes prepress preflight testing in Adobe Acrobat Professional 6.0.1 (the first version that tested for PDF/X-3).
    /hh
    Reference
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2738092?threadID=2738092&tstart=0

  • Pixels Per Inch

    Hey,
    I was wondering if anybody knew how to set the number of pixels per inch when printing a document or graph in java. Thanks.

    Check the javax.print.attribute.standard.PrinterResolution

  • Exported logo pixelated - help!

    Hello,
    I am new to illustrator, I am trying to make an indesign logo display better on the web. I have worked out how to convert an indesign file into a illustrator, I made the file the correct pixels and then exported it for 72 resoution but it is pixelated? I thought indesign was vector based? I would be so grateful if someone could let me know what I am doing wrong?
    Thanks,
    Kristina

    Regarding DPI, that is a term which is only relevant for print. If you create an image in Adobe Photoshop 9" X 6" in size at 72 pixels per inch (or "DPI") it will print out on paper at that size and resolution. On a normal letter sized sheet of paper that 9" X 6" X 72ppi image might look a little coarse. At 72 pixels per inch it's only 648 pixels across by 432 pixels tall. If the same graphic is created at 150 pixels per inch it's going to look quite a bit sharper when printed on paper. It's still the same 9" X 6" printed size, but at 150ppi it has 1350 X 900 pixels. That's how "DPI" and resolution works in print.
    DPI really doesn't mean anything for graphics that will be shown on computer screens, mobile phone screens, tablets, HDTV sets or even LED-based "jumbotron" signs. They all have fixed pixel grids and a raster-based graphic is going to map to them pixel for pixel regardless of any DPI setting that was applied to it. If you have a 1920 X 1080 resolution computer screen, a raster based graphic 648 X 432 pixels in size is going to occupy that amount of pixels on a HD resolution monitor regardless of whether it was saved at 72 DPI, 150 DPI or even 2000 DPI. The DPI setting makes no difference.
    I work with customers helping them create artwork to either show on a LED-based electronic variable message center sign they just purchased or working with them on creating digital billboard ads. The DPI concept comes up frequently. It's difficult to get them to understand the importance of the pixel dimensions of their graphics and assets and the pixel dimensions of the LED sign or monitor where the ad will be displayed.
    Regarding SVG, all of the new web browsers support SVG natively. Even the past couple versions of Microsoft Internet Explorer have built in support for SVG. Old Windows XP based PCs running Internet Explorer 8 (which lacked SVG support) are disappearing fast. In the mobile space most new phone models support SVG with their "stock" web browsers. I frequently visit https://html5test.com/ for feature comparisons with a variety of web browsers on different devices. SVG support is far better than it used to be. IMHO, SVG support is widespread enough now to use it without all sorts of browser fall-back hacks. User interfaces on web sites created in SVG will be able to scale up or down across the extreme size and pixel count differences of many displays, be it a small mobile phone display or a 5K resolution 27" iMac screen.

  • What's the pixel pitch or ppl for the 15.2" LCD?

    What's the contrast rate as well?
    Thank you.

    Hi, Serenity. The 15.2" LCD display in my Tibook has a native (actual) pixel count of 1280 (in 12.62") x 854 (in 8.45") for an actual pixel density of ~101.5 pixels per inch and about 10,250 pixels per square inch. I believe your Aluminum Powerbook's active display area measurements are the same, and I know its native resolution is the same.
    I've never seen a maximum-contrast specification for the display and don't have the equipment to measure my own (which is over a year and a half old). Since the display's maximum brightness (and thus its maximum contrast) diminishes with age like any other LCD's, the factory spec would only be met in a brand-new Powerbook anyway.

  • Custom book export resolution problem in PDF - only 150DPI!?

    I've been using the custom book option and when it came to exporting my PDF I have run into a problem involving the undocumented output resolution of a PDF at a given size. The custom book dialog allows you to create a book with a certain size in inches, but this really has no real meaning since the resolution of that output cannot also be specified in either the layout option or the print dialog. For example is it 150dpi or 300dpi? From some investigation it appears to be locked at 150DPI.
    Now I would have thought that Aperture was intelligent enough to just treat the album layout (this is my assumption) as some kind of smart object, where the layout is resolution independent and the final output resolution can be determined when printing to a printer or PDF. In that case the dialog for the setup of the custom size is correct. However, there is no option that I can see in the print dialog to actually specify the output resolution; Aperture is left to its own devices to specify an output resolution, which is undocumented.
    I use a printer that accepts JPG or TIF files and I need 300dpi for an album size of 10x13 inches. This equates to 3900x3000 pixels per page. I am able to export to PDF in the print dialog and then used an automator action to export each page of the PDF as JPG and reimported back into Aperture 2 in the same action. In the PDF>JPG conversion option there is the ability to set the DPI to 300. That works fine and the resulting JPG images show as 300dpi (3900x3000px). When looking at the images though they look a little soft, which leads me to believe that my action was simply interpolating a 150dpi image in the PDF into 300dpi.
    So to test this, I noticed that if I exported just one page of the album as a PDF and opened the PDF in Preview it does indeed tell you that it is 13x10 inches (no mention of the pixel resolution though). So, you can actually reimport a single page PDF into Aperture and if you do this it appears that the actual resolution is 1950x1500 and that equates to 150dpi for a 13x10 inch layout.
    So there are two things that could possibly be going on here:
    1. The actual layout of the album is locked at 150DPI and the save to PDF simply takes that and exports a PDF at that resolution.
    2. The layout of the album is resolution independent, the size of the album (in the custom dialog) simply controls the aspect of the page layout, and the print dialog (save to PDF) is exporting as 150DPI as default. When I run my automator action (these are the Leopard PDF actions), the save each page to JPG action is up-res'ing the image to 300dpi.
    This is where I need help. Is 1 or 2 (or something else?) happening. Also, does the PDF save as JPG12? That too is undocumented.
    If number 1 is happening I may have to set my album size to 26x20inches to get a 10x13 inch page at 300dpi.
    If number 2 is happening I need to find a PDF/TIFF/JPEG print driver to enable me to export at 300dpi as the print dialog in not standard (and we don't get the nice 'save as' drop down where we could do other things. So far my search has led me to CUPS-PDF, but that still doesn't allow for resolution to be set: http://www.codepoetry.net/projects/cups-pdf-for-mosx
    Why can't Apple just figure this thing out correctly and allow the resolution to be specified by the user - what an oversight given all of the feedback requests for the custom album tool. We need 300dpi as a minimum as we can always down-res if we want.
    Any ideas? I've got albums to send to clients! Help!
    Thanks

    When you import any PDF into Aperture, I think it rasterizes any PDF you import to a 150dpi flat image on import, even if it was a high res PDF to begin with. But theres the thing, PDFs don't have dpi (as such). Any shapes or text is a vector so don't have a DPI as they'll scale when printed. The images use their DPI when they were imported from the program that created the PDF.
    So I did a quick test and put a page I made from Aperture in to Acrobat and ran a preflight check on all images to check the resolution. It came back at 349.956 ppi, so this example was over 350dpi.
    I've attached the screenshot
    Jason

  • Aperture Export Resolution...

    Does anyone know how to change the export resolution in Aperture? Any versions I export are 72 DPI regardless of format (tiff, jpeg, psd), while the RAW masters export at full 300 DPI resolution.
    Choose an image, and right-click on it. Select Output>Export Version. I've tried every option, and it always exports at 72 DPI. I know this because I open the exported image in Preview or Photoshop CS2, and the information on the file is that it is 72 DPI.
    I've checked in the preferences, but can't find any way of changing this. It seems rediculous that Apple would put out Pro software for Photographers that would only export files at web res.
    Anyone know how to change this?
    20" iMac G5   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

    Okay, so there are thrid party apps to do it, and I
    greatly appreciate you explaining them, but is there
    no way to set Aperture to export at 300 dpi for
    everything except web and e-mail outputs?
    I guess what I'm getting at is that Aperture is
    supposed to be the ultimate workflow solution,
    eliminating all other applications except Photoshop.
    Surely there must be way to set Aperture to export
    at 300 dpi.
    The thing is that DPI really means nothing independent of resolution - it is only a kind of hint to other programs as to what the size may be, but does not by itslef really control print size or anything else. Just a default size in some applications. Even though I have given a workaround for setting DPI I really don't use it myself as I simply export and then use the images in other programs, like InDesign, or send them off for printing.
    Aperture currently simply ignores these values, passing them on from the original RAW file. So right now it has no way to alter DPI as it does not know what it is for any file. Aperture does not care, it does not need to as it scales images up or down as required by the task at hand.
    I agree that Aperture should have some way to select a DPI for export, or possibly let you edit the metadata value for the resolution in a version (along with lots of other metadata). But I also think it really doesn't matter that much, as all that really matters in the end is how many pixels there are in the image you are outputting. That is something Aperture does let you control (though not quite as well for upsampling as I would like).
    Does this make sense, or am I not understanding
    something here?
    No, you are understanding the current limitations perfectly. What is it you need the DPI set specifically for?

  • Where can i find what the resolution is of the IPad 2 10"

    I Want to put a photo os my own to the background of my IPad, but i have to change the resolution of the photo, because it is now tooo big. But i do not know what the resolution is of my iPad.  Can somebody help me?
    cobie

    Display Size
    9.7-inch (diagonal) widescreen
    Display Resolution
    1024 by 768 pixels
    Pixel Density
    132 ppi

  • 8ft x 4ft poster...but how many dots per inch for images?

    I've read a online somewhere a while back that the bigger the end product, the less the amount of dots per inch needed. is this true? if so, when do I start changing from 300dpi for A3 sizes to smaller DPI's on larger size prints?
    is there a way to calculate this? I'm always thinking it might for spending less ink on the larger size prints, etc
    and what should I use for a 8x4ft poster when:
    1. people are gonna see it up close
    2. when the closest they get would be about 4-5 feet away
    with this particular poster, people are gonna be up close.
    thanks for any info

    Was DYP wrote:
    hummm....I would'nt want to work on an 8ft x 4ft banner at s/s size on a 21" inch screen, each to his/her own I guess.
    I don't see where that would make any difference in working with the file, but it sure makes it convenient for printing. I work on lots of full size banners all the time. The only time a make them less than full size is when I am working on something bigger that 18' which is IDs maximum size.
    But doing them half size at 300 dpi is fine to. You just need to be careful that your graphics are not to low a resolution or you will be in for some surprises from IDs output, especially if you trying res-up when printing.
    I was really trying to suggest its easier to move around on screen if the artwork is not size for size.
    I guess everyone has their own particular way of working. I don't even produce A2 output at s/s size. I'll do that at either A4 or A3.
    I agree with the low res graphics. I don't seem to have any issues with just supplying 300dpi for any sized output to be honest. I've produced largish exhibition stands and A4 hand-outs from the same file. Seems to work ok for me.

  • How do i know what audio resolution i recorded at?

    I'm not sure what audio resolution i recorded a project at and I don't think the audio resolution selection in the Preferences stays where you set it for each individual project, I believe it defaults to 'Good'.  thanks.
    -Brian

    Cartner wrote:
    I'm not sure what audio resolution i recorded a project at
    You could always export it ("Share") to itunes. Once in iTunes, you could Get Info (click Command I), and the Summary page will list the resolution.
    (make sure to "Send your song to iTunes in its original quality" - don't compress).
    Cartner wrote:
    I don't think the audio resolution selection in the Preferences stays where you set it for each individual project, I believe it defaults to 'Good'. 
    My experience is that it does remember its last setting, and doesn't change until you change it.

  • What size, resolution, color space and bit do I use for a book?

    What size, resolution, and color space do I use for a iPhoto book?

    At least 150 DPI - actually pixel requirements depend on the print image size (pring image size * 150 will give you the minimum pixel size you need) - size is determined by the book size and theme and page layout you select - color space should be sRGB - minimal editing and using iPhoto for editing produces the best results - for more information see this article
    If a photo is the wrong ratio and you can not crop to work in most themes you can right click on the photo and fit to frame
    LN

  • What camera resolution mode is used by the Flash Player camera settings manager

    What camera resolution is used by the Flash Player camera settings manager? I am referring to the camera settings that you have to pull up by right-clicking on a Flash Player swf that is running, and from the right-click menu you hit settings...select the camera tab...and then you can hit the little camera icon and will show you the live video feed from the camera.
    In order for the live feed to be displayed, Flash Player requests a camera resolution mode to the driver. What mode is being requested?
    For example, could it be 160x120 @ 30fps?
    Or is it 176x144 @ 30fps?
    http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/help04.html#117113

    I have the same cam as you (it's apretty darn good cam IMHO).
    I don't ever see any resolution request when I click the icon.
    My cam initializes at 1920X1080, per the logitech specs. The box in the settings is 4:3, but the cam is running at 16:9, in apps like Skype, or FaceTime (Mac).
    It shows the same setup screen in WIn XP, Vista, Win 7 and Win 8, which ALL share the same cam on my setup.
    Being as the cam feed in the setup is 4:3, I'd have to say the resolution is 160:120  as opposed to 176:144 which would be a 5.3:3 or 16:9.

  • What happened to the 30 inch Cinema display?

    What happened to the 30 inch Cinema display?
    I went into the Apple store to purchase one, all they had was the (too small) 27 inch with the ugly black border.
    I did find a few used 30 inch Cinema displays on ebay, they are over $1100 USED.
    Any suggestions, for a 30 inch display?

    No suggestions, apart from changing to a non-Apple display such as a LaCie one.
    I think Apple really makes a mistake with the new displays - they are nifty, granted, if you want to watch TV or the like, but they'll loose the professionals, working all day long with their displays.
    1. the new displays have an excellent resolution, no trouble there, but they are like mirrors, reflecting lamps, etc. and very tiring for the eyes. That's already a problem with my MacBook Pro but I've got to accept it - what else is there to do - and fortunately it's only my secondary system.
    2. we have gotten used to 30" and do not want to downgrade.
    I am a translator and need to work with technical plants and several open files, so 30" really helped facilitate work. And now that's all gone as the 27" display definitely is not up to scratch for day-long work...
    I ordered a 30" display right when it became available, so it's quite old now. I worry what I'll do when it breaks down ...
    Suzanne

  • How to convert Pixels into inch?

    Hi Friends,
    I am using Crystal XI R2.
    I have standard Report formatting specifications. This document states all the specifications in Pixels and not in inches.
    I am not sure on the pixel to inches conversion.
    Can anyone please help on this how to convert the pixels into inches...
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ashish

    you need to know their scale as in Dot per inch to be able to do the conversion. 72 dpi will give you are larger number compared to 96 dpi
    here is a link
    http://mystic-nights.com/poser/tools/pixels-to-inches.html
    Edited by: Zilla Eh on Nov 28, 2008 1:49 AM

  • Export resolution stumper. . . .

    I'm not very proficient at iMovie, so I'm perplexed by how I increased my export resolution the last time I created a movie.
    Here's the background, I have iMovie 11 and my video camera is a Panasonic PV-GS500. Each time I've exported a movie to the media browser, it limited me to a large movie. However, the last time for some reason, it allowed me to export a 1080p version. Now I'm exporting another movie, but again I'm limited to a large movie. Anybody have any idea what I did last time to increase the resolution to HD. The camera, media, and software have remained constant for what it's worth.
    Thanks for the help!

    Then I would try - just to in-circle the possibly culprit
    • Start a new User Account (Apple-menu / System Pref. / Accounts / Plus sign)
    • Log out of this Account and into the New one (Apple-menu down to las option)
    • Now start iMovie and import some material and re-try Share function
    If this now works - then my Guess is that the problem is in
    • iMovie pref file/s - or -
    • iMovie Casche files
    in the old account - and that trashing them will be the medicine (as iMovie now has to create New and error free ones)
    This is a very common problem - most often due to - Panic/Forced Quits - as they induces errors in lot's of places ( finally adding up to a Major Break-down ). So by
    • Trashing these files
    • Running - Repair Permissions (Disk Util tool)
    • Running - Repair Hard Disk (Disk Util tool - but now You first has to start Mac from DVD or ext. Hard Disk)
    I can keep this Major problem away as long as possibly.
    (and only Force Quit - when there are no other option (as just waiting it out)
    Yours Bengt W

Maybe you are looking for

  • DPS(PDF) on Content Viewer V24 for iPad

    Hi all, I created DPS Magazine Decmber issue (1024 x 768: Image = PDF), and checked it(not published folo) on Content viewer v24(2.9.0.0.63929) for iPad. I set Folio version: v22 on Folio Builder menu, because of my released viewer app is v22. On iPa

  • Original airport card connection to Belkin Wireless G Plus router

    I have an iBook G3 with an original airport card in it. The card works because I can acess the internet at school or the local Wi-Fi hotspots. I cannot however connect to my own network at home. The computer will pick up my network but when I try to

  • Wish iPod had Crossfade =)  & Wishlist

    Its in iTunes, Windows Media Player, WinAmp so i just wish iPod had crossfade. Also in my wish list: * iPod with intergrated camera (its got the memory, pictures display wish iPod had a camera) * Replaceable Cover (like Nokia cell phones) * Replaceab

  • Iphone 5s camera lens rattle

    hello my friends My problem is when I shake the iPhone's voice coming from inside. Even when I kept all the buttons I feel this is the sound of the camera lens Even when the vibration noise is heard Is there a problem for everyone? I am an obsessive

  • Upgrading to Encore 2.0 less issues?

    I use Encore 1.5 and have a number of errors with some DVD projects. The lastest is the -16072 end of file error. Is 2.0 less prone to these bugs? I've spent a ton of time working in Encore, creating menus and projects and would like to stay within t